Skip to main content
Iranian Journal of Parasitology logoLink to Iranian Journal of Parasitology
. 2015 Jul-Sep;10(3):465–472.

Genotyping Characterization of Toxoplasma gondii in Cattle, Sheep, Goats and Swine from the North of Portugal

Ana Patrícia LOPES 1,2,*, Anabela VILARES 3, Francisco NETO 1, Alcina RODRIGUES 4, Tânia MARTINS 4, Idalina FERREIRA 3, Maria João GARGATÉ 3, Manuela RODRIGUES 1,2, Luís CARDOSO 1,5
PMCID: PMC4662747  PMID: 26622302

Abstract

Background: Epidemiological investigations on Toxoplasma gondii infection have found a significant association between human toxoplasmosis and consumption of raw or undercooked meat. The present study aimed to characterize genotypes of T. gondii in 20 cattle, 40 sheep, 15 goats and 16 pigs from the North of Portugal.

Methods: Nested PCR amplified the surface antigen 2 (SAG2) gene. Sequencing analysis was performed in order to assess the prevalence of SAG2 type strains (I, II and III).

Results: Three and 4 strains of SAG2 type II were identified in heart samples of cattle and sheep, respectively. Three SAG2 type II strains were detected in brain, diaphragm and heart of 3 pigs. Three strains detected in heart samples of 3 goats belonged to SAG2 types I or II; with the same result being observed in heart samples from 2 sheep and in 2 brain and 1 heart samples from 3 pigs.

Conclusion: SAG2 type II has been shown for the first time to infect cattle in North of Portugal. In addition, SAG2 type II has also been confirmed as the predominant strain in sheep and pigs in the same region. This is the first molecular report of T. gondii in goats from Portugal.

Key Words: Genotypes, Portugal, Ruminants, Swine, Toxoplasma gondii

Introduction

Toxoplasmosis, caused by the protozoan Toxoplasma gondii, is a global parasitic zoonosis. Domestic and wild felids are the definitive hosts of the parasite and a great variety of other homeothermic animals are intermediate hosts. Herbivores acquire infection mainly by the ingestion of oocysts in water or contaminated food. Carnivores and omnivores, including human beings, can additionally become infected by ingesting meat with cysts (bradyzoites) or even pseudocysts (tachyzoites) (1).

Epidemiological investigations have found a significant association between human toxoplasmosis and the consumption of raw or undercooked meat or its products (1). Infections with the parasite are also an important cause of foetal mortality in sheep and goats (). It has originated outbreaks of abortion in small ruminant farms, leading to serious economic and reproductive losses (). Furthermore, T. gondii may affect the swine reproductive outcome as well, causing abortion or stillbirths ().

Most of the identified strains of T. gondii obtained from humans and animals in Europe, using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) and microsatellite analysis, are grouped into one of three clonal lineages of type I, II or III (). These strains have been described in Portugal, with types II and III as common in pigs and chicken (68). Studies in other European countries, including France, Spain, Switzerland, and Germany, have revealed a predominance of genotype II in domestic animals (912).

Due to the relatively scarce information on the molecular detection and characterization of T. gondii in animals for human consumption in Portugal, this study aimed at detecting parasitic DNA in tissues from cattle, sheep, goats and pigs raised and slaughtered in the North of the country and to genetically characterize infecting strains of T. gondii.

Materials and Methods

Animals and samples

Between March 2008 and March 2010, heart tissue samples were obtained from cattle (n = 20), sheep (n = 40) and goats (n = 15), slaughtered in abattoirs from the North of Portugal. Heart (n = 4), brain (n = 10), diaphragm (n = 6) and tongue (n = 1) tissues were randomly sampled from 16 slaughtered pigs. All the sampled animals had been born and raised in the North of Portugal and were intended for human consumption. Individual tissue samples were stored at -20 ºC until DNA extraction. Data were collected for each sampled animal included gender, breed, age in months and husbandry system (intensive, semi-intensive or extensive). Twelve cattle, 34 sheep, 5 goats and the 16 pigs were seropositive to T. gondii, as determined by an antibody titer ≥ 20 in the modified agglutination test (13).

This study was approved by the UTAD Veterinary Hospital Ethical Committee as complying with the Portuguese legislation for the protection of animals (Law no. 92/1995).

DNA extraction

Tissue samples were digested in a trypsin solution for 2 hours at 37 ºC, with pellets being stored at -20 ºC until use. DNA extraction was performed as previously described by Miller et al. (14). DNA was precipitated by addition of 100% ethanol (-20 ºC), resuspended in 300 µl of DNAse/RNase free water and stored at -20 ºC until use.

Polymerase chain reaction

Nested PCR separately amplified the 5’ and 3’ ends of the surface antigen 2 (SAG2) gene (15), following the specific protocol described for AmpliTaq DNA polymerase® (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA). Two PCR were used to amplify external sequences of the first and second fragments of gene SAG2. The first fragment was amplified with primers SAG2.F4 (5’ GCT-ACC-TCG-AAC-AGG-AAC-AC 3’) and SAG2.R4 (5’ GCA-TCA-ACA-GTC-TTC-GTT-GC 3’); and the second fragment with SAG2.F3 (5’ TCT-GTT-CTC-CGA-AGT-GAC-TCC 3’) and SAG2.R3 (5’ TCA-AAG-CGT-GCA-TTA-TCG-C 3’). A reaction mixture was used comprising 10 µl of extracted DNA, PCR buffer [2 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3)], 0.25 mM dATP, 0.25 mM dGTP, 0.25 dCTP, 0.25 dTTP, 1.25 U AmpliTaq DNA polymerase®, 20 ρmol of each external primer, and DNAse/RNAse free water to a final volume of 50 µl. PCR amplification was performed under the following conditions: 95 ºC for 10 min; 40 cycles of 94 ºC for 45 s; 53 ºC for 45 s; 72 ºC for 90 s; and then final at 72 ºC for 10 min.

One microliter of the initial PCR products was used for amplification of internal sequences of gene SAG2 first and second fragments. The first fragment was amplified with primers SAG2.F (5' GAA-ATG-TTT-CAG-GTT-GCT-GC 3') SAG2.R2 (5' GCA-AGA-GCG-AAC-TTG-AAC-AC 3'); and the second fragment with SAG2.F2 (5' ATT-CTC-ATG-CCT-CCG-CTT-C 3') and SAG2.R (5' AAC-GTT-TCA-CGA-AGG-CAC-AC 3'). Reagent concentrations and reaction conditions were the same as described above. For both amplifications, PCR mixtures with a negative result were diluted at 1:10 and retested.

Positive (T. gondii RH strain DNA) and negative (DNAse/RNAse free water or AmpliTaq DNA polymerase® buffer) controls were included in every amplification batches. All amplification products were analyzed by a 2% agarose gel electrophoresis with soaking GelRedTM dye (Biotium, Hayward, USA). A molecular marker was used in all assays (φ X174/RF DNA/Hae III Fragment; Invitrogen, Grand Island, USA). Visualization of a 241 bp (first fragment sequence) or a 221 bp band (second fragment sequence) was considered a positive result.

Genotyping

Sequence analysis for comparison of SAG2 genetic profiles was performed in order to assess the prevalence of T. gondii SAG2 type strains (I, II and III). Nested PCR products were purified with ExoSAP-IT® (Affymetrix, UK) and sequenced using BigDyeTM (Applied Biosystems, USA), following manufacturer’s instructions and using the internal primers. Products were purified through DyeEx® columns (Qiagen, Crawley, UK) and processed in an automatic sequencer 3130 XL Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, USA). Results were aligned with BioEdit program and compared to the following sequence data available from GenBank: AM055943.1 RH type I, XM002371960.1 ME49 type II, AF357579.1 NED type III, AF357582.1 CASTELLS atypic strain, and AF357580.1 MAS atypic strain (GenBank).

Data analysis

McNemar test compared PCR and serology results in paired samples, i.e. those obtained from the same animal. Statistical analyses were done with SPSS software for Windows (Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Table 1 presents PCR results in the 75 ruminants (20 cattle, 40 sheep and 15 goats). Figure 1 shows gel electrophoresis after PCR amplification with SAG2.F and SAG2.R2 primers.

Table 1.

SAG2 PCR results in randomly selected heart samples of seropositive (n = 51) and seronegative (n = 24) ruminants from the North of Portugal

Ruminants Animals (n) Relative distribution (%) PCR positive
(%)
McNemar
test
Cattle
Seropositive 12 60.0 50.0
Seronegative 8 40.0 0.0 P = 0.031
Sheep
Seropositive 34 85.0 17.6
Seronegative 6 15.0 0.0 P < 0.001
Goats
Seropositive 5 33.3 60.0
Seronegative 10 66.7 0.0 P = 0.500
Total
Seropositive 51 68.0 29.4
Seronegative 24 32.0 0.0 P < 0.001

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

PCR (SAG2.F and SAG2.R2 primers) gel electrophoresis. Band 1: molecular weight marker; band 2: positive control (~241 bp); bands 3, 4 and 6: positive results; band 5: negative control; bands 7 and 8: negative results

Table 2 displays the characterization of T. gondii strains detected in cattle, sheep, goats and pigs from the North of Portugal.

Table 2.

Toxoplasma gondii SAG2 strains detected in cattle, sheep, goats and pigs from the North of Portugal

Strain SAG2 genotype Gender Breed Age group Husbandry system MAT titer
Cattle
TgPtB1 II M Crossbreed [H] ]8-12 months] Semi-intensive 100
TgPtB2 II F Crossbreed [H] ]8-12 months] Semi-intensive 100
TgPtB3 II M Crossbreed [H] ]8-12 months] Semi-intensive 100
TgPtB4 neg F Mirandesa [H] ]8-12 months] Semi-intensive 100
TgPtB5 neg M Crossbreed [H] [5-8 months] Semi-intensive 100
TgPtB6 neg M Arouquesa [H] [5-8 months] Semi-intensive 100
Sheep
TgPtS1 II F Cross of Churra [H] ≥ 19 months Extensive 20
TgPtS2 I or II M Churra Terra Quente [H] [7-18 months] Semi-intensive ≥ 6400
TgPtS3 II M Churra Badana [H] ≤ 6 months Semi-intensive 20
TgPtS4 II M Churra Terra Quente [H] ≤ 6 months Semi-intensive 20
TgPtS5 II M Churra Terra Quente [H] ≤ 6 months Semi-intensive 20
TgPtS6 I or II F Churra Terra Quente [H] ≤ 6 months Semi-intensive 400
Goat
TgPtG1 I or II M Preta de Montesinho [H] ≤ 6 months Semi-intensive 20
TgPtG2 I or II M Preta de Montesinho [H] ≤ 6 months Semi-intensive 20
TgPtG3 I or II M Preta de Montesinho [H] ≤ 6 months Semi-intensive 20
Pig
TgPtP1 I or II M Cross of Bísaro [H] ≤ 3 months Intensive 400
TgPtP2 II F Cross of Bísaro [H] ≤ 3 months Intensive 400
TgPtP3 II F Cross of Bísaro [Br] [4-9 months] Intensive 20
TgPtP4 neg F Piétrain [Br] [4-9 months] Intensive 20
TgPtP5 II F Piétrain [D] [4-9 months] Intensive 20
TgPtP6 neg F Piétrain [D] ≥ 10 months Intensive 20
TgPtP7 I or II F Piétrain [Br] ≥ 10 months Intensive 20
TgPtP8 I or II F Bísaro [Bra] ≥ 10 months Semi-intensive 20
TgPtP9 neg F Bísaro [Da] ≥ 10 months Semi-intensive 20

B: bovine; Br: brain; D: diaphragm; F: female; G: goat; H: heart; M: male; MAT: modified agglutination test; neg: negative; P: pig; Pt: Portugal; S: sheep; Tg: Toxoplasma gondii; a same individual pig.

In 6 animals (25.0%) sequencing analysis was negative after completion of several dilutions. Due to small concentration of DNA, the second fragment (3' fragment) did not amplify, and it was not possible to differentiate between SAG2 type I and type II alleles in other eight (33.3%) out of the 24 characterized isolates.

Only four (TgPtB1; TgPtB2; TgPtS3; TgPtS4) of the 24 SAG2 positive samples were found positive by real time PCR. In addition, two SAG2 negative samples were found positive after real time PCR.

Discussion

This work represents the first molecular study on T. gondii infection in goats from Portugal and in cattle from the North region of the country. In food animals from the North of Portugal for human consumption, the seroprevalence of T. gondii infection has been 7.5% in cattle, 33.6% in sheep, 18.5% in goats, and 9.8% in pigs (). Still in northern Portugal, a 24.4% prevalence of antibodies to T. gondii has been detected in women of childbearing age ().

In the present work, 50% of the seropositive cattle were also found to be positive after SAG2 nested PCR. Results obtained in other countries report the detection of the parasite in the myocardium of 10% of seropositive cattle in Argentina (18) and in meat of 38% of cattle in the United Kingdom (19). One of the major difficulties in detecting T. gondii DNA in tissues of cattle is the limited size of the samples. Since 100 g of beef can contain only one tissue cyst, a negative result from a smaller sample does not necessarily mean that all the sampled tissue is free from the parasite (20).

The SAG2 gene is useful for genotyping strains of T. gondii and characterizing isolates as one of the three types of the clonal lineages (). Nevertheless, SAG2 does not detect strains with recombinant or atypical genotypes (21). For this reason, it is appropriate for geographical areas where the clonal lineages predominate, like Europe (2224). This is corroborated by studies in food animals from Portugal (), France () and Switzerland (), where all genotypes obtained through the analysis of SAG2 belonged to the major clonal lineages, as confirmed by microsatellite analysis. This dominance of type II strains in Portugal was also described in humans by Esteves (7).

In the present study, genetic characterization of sheep isolates from northern Portugal has identified four strains of SAG2 type II and two strains of SAG2 type I or II (Table 2). In southern Portugal, Esteves (7) found an equal proportion of genotypes of types I and II in sheep based on analysis of SAG2 and microsatellites. The information available on the isolation and genotyping of strains from goats is very scarce worldwide. In the present study T. gondii was detected in three out of five seropositive goats (60%). However, the sequencing results were inconclusive, and the strains may belong to either a SAG2 type I or II genotype.

Genetic characterization of the swine strains identified three genotypes of SAG2 type II and three of SAG2 type I or II (Table 2). Also from pigs of northern Portugal, through SAG2 and microsatellites analysis, Sousa et al. (8) detected T. gondii in 40.5% of heart and/or brain of seropositive animals with a predominance of type II strains and fewer of type III. The isolation of the parasite is difficult or even impossible in pigs with low antibody titers (25, 26). Nevertheless, it is likely that a seropositive pig has infective forms in its tissues, and the consumption of undercooked meat or meat products from these animals is a risk factor for transmission to humans (). Furthermore, the existence of seropositivity is an indicator of the hygienic status and the risk of infection for a given pig farm (27).

In the present study, the analysis of SAG2 indicated the predominance of type II strains in animals in the North of Portugal, which may be due to increased circulation of this type in the region, but also because these strains have a greater potential of cyst formation in the host. The intermediate virulence of type II does not lead to a frequent death of the host, allowing the animals to survive until slaughtering (28). In eight cases, it was not possible to differentiate between types I and II by sequence analysis and in six other samples the results were negative probably due to a low DNA concentration.

Two samples negative for SAG2 (nested PCR) were found positive after real time PCR, and only four of the 24 positive SAG2 samples were found positive by real time PCR.

This might be explained by the different protocols and sensitivities of the two PCR techniques. Although seroprevalence values of infection in animals are usually higher than those of the molecular analysis, there is usually a good correlation between antibody titres and the presence of viable cysts (29, ). In the present study, for cases in which PCR was negative but seroconversion has occurred the PCR result may reflect a low number or a transient presence of T. gondii in the sample ().

Even though in Europe SAG2 type II strains have frequently been found equivalent to the clonal type II (as confirmed by microsatellite analysis), recent data show that even in Europe there may be recombinant or atypical strains. Therefore, the present work is a preliminary study that should be complement with other investigations markers to confirm the membership to clonal type II.

Conclusion

The present study provides a deeper knowledge on the genotypes of T. gondii that circulate in northern Portugal by showing for the first time SAG2 type II to infect cattle in the North of Portugal and goats in the whole country. SAG2 type II has also been confirmed as the predominant one in sheep and pigs in northern Portugal. Due to the zoonotic character of T. gondii, control of the infection in food animals is important for consumer protection.

Acknowledgements

A.P. Lopes was sponsored by scholarship SFRH/BD/44438/2008, from the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT, Portugal) and the European Social Fund. The authors thank Prof. L. Ferreira, Eng. T. Coutinho, Dr. S. Martins, Ms. C. Moura and Mr. H. Augusto for their assistance. The authors declare no conflict of interests.

References

  • 1.Dubey JP. Toxoplasmosis of Animals and Humans. 2nd ed. . USA: CRC Press: Boca Raton; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chanton-Greutmann H, Thoma R, Corboz L, Borel N. Abortion in small ruminants in Switzerland: investigations during two lambing seasons (1996-1998) with special regard to chlamydial abortions. Pospischil A Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd. 2002;144:483–492. doi: 10.1024/0036-7281.144.9.483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dubey JP. Toxoplasmosis in sheep-the last 20 years. Vet Parasitol. 2009;162:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.02.026. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.02.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dubey JP. Toxoplasmosis in pigs-the last 20 years. Vet Parasitol. 2009;164:89–103. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.05.018. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.05.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ajzenberg D, Bañuls AL, Tibayrenc M, Dardé ML. Microsatellite analysis of Toxoplasma gondii population shows considerable polymorphism structured into two main clonal groups. Int J Parasitol. 2000;32:27–38. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(01)00301-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dubey JP, Vianna M.B, Sousa S, Canada N, Meireles S, Correia da Costa JM, Marcet PL, Lehmann T, Dardé ML, Thulliez P. Characterization of Toxoplasma gondii isolates in free-range chickens from Portugal. J Parasitol. 2006;92:184–186. doi: 10.1645/GE-652R.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Esteves ABGVB. Caracterização genética de estirpes de Toxoplasma gondii isoladas de produtos humanos e animais. Lisbon, Portugal: MSc, University of Lisbon; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sousa S, Ajzenberg D, Canada N, Freire, L, Da Costa JM, Dardé ML, Thulliez P, Dubey JP. Biologic and molecular characterization of Toxoplasma gondii isolates from pigs from Portugal. Vet Parasitol. Vet Parasitol. 2006;135:133–136. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dumètre A, Ajzenberg D, Rozette L, Mercier A, Dardé ML. Toxoplasma gondii infection in sheep from Haute-Vienne, France: seroprevalence and isolate genotyping by microsatellite analysis. Vet Parasitol. 2006;142:376–379. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Montoya A, Miró G, Mateo M, Ramírez C, Fuentes I. Molecular characterization of Toxoplasma gondii isolates from cats in Spain. J Parasitol. 2008;94:1044–1046. doi: 10.1645/GE-1403.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Herrmann DC, Pantchev N, Vrhovec MG, Barutzki D, Wilking H, Fröhlich A, Lüder CGK, Conraths FJ, Schares G. Atypical Toxoplasma gondii genotypes identified in oocysts shed by cats in Germany. Int J Parasitol. 2010;40:285–292. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2009.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Berger-Schoch AE, Herrmann DC, Schares G, Müller N, Bernet D, Gottstein B, Frey CF. Prevalence and genotypes of Toxoplasma gondii in feline faeces (oocysts) and meat from sheep, cattle and pigs in Switzerland. Vet Parasitol. 2011;177:290–297. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.11.046. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.11.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lopes AP, Dubey JP, Neto F, Rodrigues A, Martins T, Rodrigues M, Cardoso L. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in cattle, sheep, goats and pigs from the North of Portugal for human consumption. Vet Parasitol. 2013;193:266–269. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.12.001. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Miller S, Dykes D, Polesky H. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988;16:1215–1219. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.3.1215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Howe DK, Honoré S, Derouin F, Sibley LD. Determination of genotypes of Toxoplasma gondii strains isolated from patients with toxoplasmosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:1411–1414. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.6.1411-1414.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cassaing S, Bessières MH, Berry A, Berrebi A, Fabre R, Magnaval JF. Comparison between two amplification sets for molecular diagnosis of toxoplasmosis by real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:720–724. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.3.720-724.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lopes AP, Dubey JP, Moutinho O, Gargaté MJ, Vilares A, Rodrigues M, Cardoso L. Seroepidemiology of Toxoplasma gondii infection in women from the North of Portugal in their childbearing years. Epidemiol Infect. 2012;140:872–877. doi: 10.1017/S0950268811001658. doi: 10.1017/S0950268811001658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Moré G, Basso W, Bacigalupe D, Venturini MC, Venturini L. Diagnosis of Sarcocystis cruzi, Neospora caninum, and Toxoplasma gondii infections in cattle. Parasitol Res. 2008;102:671–675. doi: 10.1007/s00436-007-0810-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Aspinall TV, Marlee D, Hyde JE, Sims PF. Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in commercial meat products as monitored by polymerase chain reaction–food for thought? Int J Parasitol. 2002;32:1193–1199. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(02)00070-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dubey JP, Thulliez P. Persistence of tissue cysts in edible tissues of cattle fed Toxoplasma gondii oocysts. Am J Vet Res. 1993;54:270–273. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Belfort-Neto R, Nussenblatt V, Rizzo L, Muccioli C, Silveira C, Nussenblatt R, Khan A, Sibley LD, Belfort RJr. High prevalence of unusual genotypes of Toxoplasma gondii infection in pork meat samples from Erechim, Southern Brazil. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2007;79:111–114. doi: 10.1590/s0001-37652007000100013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fuentes I, Rubio JM, Ramírez C, Alvar J. Genotypic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii strains associated with human toxoplasmosis in Spain: direct analysis from clinical samples. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:1566–1570. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.4.1566-1570.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ferreira IM, Idal JE, Costa-Silva TA, Meira CS, Hiramoto RM, Penalva de Oliveira AC, Pereira-Chioccola VL. Toxoplasma gondii: genotyping of strains from Brazilian AIDS patients with cerebral toxoplasmosis by multilocus PCR-RFLP markers. Exp Parasitol. 2008;118:221–217. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2007.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Su C, Zhang X, Dubey JP. Genotyping of Toxoplasma gondii by multilocus PCR-RFLP markers: a high resolution and simple method for identification of parasites. Int J Parasitol. 2006;36:841–848. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2006.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dubey JP, Thulliez P, Powell EC. Toxoplasma gondii in Iowa sows: comparison of antibody titers to isolation of T. gondii by bioassays in mice and cats. J Parasitol. 1995;81:48–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gajadhar AA, Aramini JJ, Tiffin G, Bisaillon J-R. Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in Canadian market-age pigs. J Parasitol. 1998;84:759–763. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Damriyasa IM, Bauer C, Edelhofer R, Failing K, Lind P, Petersene E, Schares G, Tenter AM, Volmer R, Zahner H. Cross-sectional survey in pig breeding farms in Hesse, Germany: seroprevalence and risk factors of infections with Toxoplasma gondii, Sarcocystis spp. and Neospora caninum in sows. Vet Parasitol. 2004;126:271–286. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Weiss LM, Kim K. The development and biology of bradyzoites of Toxoplasma gondii. Front Biosci. 2000;5:D391–D405. doi: 10.2741/weiss. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Waldeland H. Toxoplasmosis in sheep. The prevalence of Toxoplasma antibodies in lambs and mature sheep from different parts of Norway. Acta Vet Scand. 1976;17:432–440. doi: 10.1186/BF03547898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mason S, Quinnell RJ, Smith JE. Detection of Toxoplasma gondii in lambs via PCR screening and serological follow-up. Vet Parasitol. 2010;169:258–263. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.01.021. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Parasitology are provided here courtesy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES