Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1993 Jun 1;90(11):4957–4960. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.11.4957

Nouns and verbs are retrieved with differently distributed neural systems.

A R Damasio 1, D Tranel 1
PMCID: PMC46632  PMID: 8506341

Abstract

In a task designed to elicit the production of verbs, the patients known as AN-1033 and Boswell consistently produced the correct target words, performing no differently from normal controls. However, in a similar task designed to elicit the production of nouns, both patients performed quite defectively, and their scores were many SDs below those of controls. Language processing was otherwise normal--i.e., there were no impairments in grammar, morphology, phonetic implementation, or prosody; reading and writing were normal. In a third patient (KJ-1360), we obtained the reverse outcome--i.e., retrieval of common and proper nouns was preserved, but verb retrieval was defective. Together, the findings in the three patients constitute a double dissociation between noun and verb retrieval. In AN-1033 and Boswell, the lesions are located outside the so-called language areas (left frontoparietal operculum, posterior temporal region, inferior parietal lobule), where damage is associated with aphasia. The region of damage shared by the two patients is in left anterior and middle temporal lobe. This sector of left hemisphere contains systems for the retrieval of nouns that denote concrete entities. We propose that those systems are not essential for the retrieval of verbs and not involved in the vocal implementation of word forms. Those systems perform a two-way lexical-mediation role for concrete nouns and promote the reconstruction of a word form after the processing of sensory-motor characteristics of the entity denoted by that word. The findings in patient KJ-1360, whose lesion is in left premotor cortex, suggest that equivalent mediation systems for verbs are located in the left frontal region.

Full text

PDF
4957

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Caramazza A., Hillis A. E. Lexical organization of nouns and verbs in the brain. Nature. 1991 Feb 28;349(6312):788–790. doi: 10.1038/349788a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Damasio A. R. Aphasia. N Engl J Med. 1992 Feb 20;326(8):531–539. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199202203260806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Damasio A. R., Damasio H. Brain and language. Sci Am. 1992 Sep;267(3):88–95. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0992-88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Damasio A. R., Damasio H., Tranel D., Brandt J. P. Neural regionalization of knowledge access: preliminary evidence. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1990;55:1039–1047. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1990.055.01.098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Damasio A. R. Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: a systems-level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition. Cognition. 1989 Nov;33(1-2):25–62. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(89)90005-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Damasio H., Frank R. Three-dimensional in vivo mapping of brain lesions in humans. Arch Neurol. 1992 Feb;49(2):137–143. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1992.00530260037016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Manning L., Campbell R. Optic aphasia with spared action naming: a description and possible loci of impairment. Neuropsychologia. 1992 Jun;30(6):587–592. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(92)90061-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McCarthy R. A., Warrington E. K. Evidence for modality-specific meaning systems in the brain. Nature. 1988 Aug 4;334(6181):428–430. doi: 10.1038/334428a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McCarthy R., Warrington E. K. Category specificity in an agrammatic patient: the relative impairment of verb retrieval and comprehension. Neuropsychologia. 1985;23(6):709–727. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(85)90079-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Miceli G., Silveri M. C., Villa G., Caramazza A. On the basis for the agrammatic's difficulty in producing main verbs. Cortex. 1984 Jun;20(2):207–220. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(84)80038-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Miller G. A., Fellbaum C. Semantic networks of English. Cognition. 1991 Dec;41(1-3):197–229. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(91)90036-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Snodgrass J. G., Vanderwart M. A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn. 1980 Mar;6(2):174–215. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.6.2.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tranel D. Dissociated verbal and nonverbal retrieval and learning following left anterior temporal damage. Brain Cogn. 1991 Mar;15(2):187–200. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(91)90025-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Warrington E. K., Shallice T. Category specific semantic impairments. Brain. 1984 Sep;107(Pt 3):829–854. doi: 10.1093/brain/107.3.829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Zingeser L. B., Berndt R. S. Retrieval of nouns and verbs in agrammatism and anomia. Brain Lang. 1990 Jul;39(1):14–32. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(90)90002-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES