Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2015 Nov 30;5:16792. doi: 10.1038/srep16792

The glassy random laser: replica symmetry breaking in the intensity fluctuations of emission spectra

Fabrizio Antenucci 1,2, Andrea Crisanti 2,3, Luca Leuzzi 1,2,a
PMCID: PMC4663759  PMID: 26616194

Abstract

The behavior of a newly introduced overlap parameter, measuring the correlation between intensity fluctuations of waves in random media, is analyzed in different physical regimes, with varying amount of disorder and non-linearity. This order parameter allows to identify the laser transition in random media and describes its possible glassy nature in terms of emission spectra data, the only data so far accessible in random laser measurements. The theoretical analysis is performed in terms of the complex spherical spin-glass model, a statistical mechanical model describing the onset and the behavior of random lasers in open cavities. Replica Symmetry Breaking theory allows to discern different kinds of randomness in the high pumping regime, including the most complex and intriguing glassy randomness. The outcome of the theoretical study is, eventually, compared to recent intensity fluctuation overlap measurements demonstrating the validity of the theory and providing a straightforward interpretation of qualitatively different spectral behaviors in different random lasers.


Light amplification and propagation through random media have attracted much attention in recent years, with present-day applications to, e.g., speckle-free imaging and biomedical diagnostics1, chip-based spectrometers2,3,4, laser paints5 and cryptography6. Whatever the amplifying medium, ordered or random, in a closed or in an open cavity, two are the basic ingredients to produce laser in any optically active system: amplification and feedback. In closed cavities the electromagnetic modes straightforwardly depend on the cavity geometry. In cavity-less random media, instead, some kind of modes are established by spontaneous emission and are localized in closed photonic trajectories by means of multiple scattering. Indeed, the phenomenon of amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) can occur even in systems without any optical cavity, whose fluorescence spectrum is simply determined by the gain curve of the active medium7,8,9,10,11,12. When, because of an external pumping, the multiple-scattering feedback process becomes strong, amplification by stimulated emission is established in the random medium and we have a Random Laser (RL)13. The feedback is, here, associated to the existence of well-defined long-lived modes, characterized by a definite frequency and a spatial pattern of the electromagnetic field inside the material. Modes are expressed as slow amplitude contributions to the electromagnetic field expansion in terms of spatial mode eigenvectors Inline graphic:

graphic file with name srep16792-m2.jpg

The complex amplitudes ak(t) of these slow modes turn out to be the fundamental degree of freedom in the statistical mechanical modeling of interacting modes14,15, while the irregularity of their spatial profiles results into quenched disordered mode interactions. By quenched we mean that the interaction strengths are time independent16, as it occurs, in practice, when they change on time-scales much longer then the typical amplification time-scales, longer than the RL lifetime itself and possibly reproducible in a series of apart RL measurements on the same sample under the same experimental conditions.

At least in some random media, the RL action presents the peculiar property of displaying strong non-trivial spectral fluctuations17,18,19,20,21,22 from one excitation pulse of the pumping laser to another one23,24,25,26. These will be termed shot-to-shot fluctuations from now on. If in spectral fluctuation measurements the scattering particles and all external experimental conditions are kept constant, these fluctuations will only be due to the initial configuration of pre-pumping electromagnetic modes occurring because of spontaneous emissions.

A connection to statistical mechanical models with quenched disordered interaction, i.e., spin-glass models16,27,28,29, has been recently established14,15,30,31,32,33, providing a new point of view on the shot-to-shot fluctuations phenomenon. The leading mechanism for the non-deterministic activation of the modes is here identified with the frustration induced by the disordered interactions27 and the consequent presence of a large number of equivalent states. For state we mean a given ensemble of activated mode configurations, specified by their own wavelengths, phases and intensities, realized by very many emissions on time-scales of the order of the duration of the shot, that is, of the RL life-time itself. The diverse spectral realizations are, thus, conjectured to correspond to a glassy behavior consisting in many equivalent degenerate states constituting the RL regime. This glassy light regime is associated to an effective thermodynamic phase where the tendency of the modes to oscillate coherently in intensity is frustrated: in the language of the replica theory27, it corresponds to a phase where the symmetry among equivalent replicas is spontaneously broken34 and the overlap (i.e., the similarity) between the configurations of the mode amplitudes display a nontrivial structure15,35. Identical copies of the system show different sets of amplitude equilibrium configurations, as the ergodicity is broken in many distinct states36.

From an experimental point of view, the direct evaluation of the overlap between complex amplitudes and its probability distribution, i.e., the standard order parameter of the theory, requires the measure of the mode phases in the coherent regime. Such measure is not available so far, because of the low intensity of the RL emission (with respect to standard cavity lasers). The lack of a direct experimental knowledge of the whole overlap probability distribution is common, as well, to the original prototype systems for which replica symmetry breaking (RSB) theory was first developed, i.e., spin-glasses37,38, and also to structural glasses, one of the fields of major application of the theory39,40,41,42,43.

An experimental validation of such random-glassy laser connection, and, particularly, of the RSB predicted by the theory, has, nevertheless, recently been put forward in ref. 44, measuring the overlap between intensity fluctuations of the spectral emission. In the present work, we adopt a general model for cavity-less random lasers, in which not only the mode phases30,31,32,33 but the whole complex amplitudes are considered as the fundamental degrees of freedom of the problem14,15. In this framework we are able to demonstrate that RSB occurring in the standard amplitude overlap can, in principle, be observed in the intensity fluctuation overlap (actually a coarse-graining of the former) and vice versa. This development provides a theoretical setting to explain existing experimental results and to motivate similar measurements in diverse RL systems. Our approach also clarifies why RSB is found only in RL’s in which mode couplings can be considered fixed (termed quenched) for all shots. In liquid compounds, instead, as a TiO2 dispersion in Rhodamine B-ethylene glycol solution, no evidence for RSB is found44.

The Complex Amplitude Model

The statistical approach we adopt is based on the hypothesis of effective equilibrium. The non-equilibrium steady-state of a laser can be described as an effective equilibrium state at an effective temperature linked to the pumping rate of the source and to the true environment temperature (associated, e.g., to the noise of the spontaneous emission). In order to implement such description, the gain behavior is chosen in such a way to guarantee that the global optical power Inline graphic remains constant. As a consequence, in the mean-field limit, the complex amplitudes Inline graphic statistics is described by the general Hamiltonian14,15

graphic file with name srep16792-m5.jpg

where the sums are unrestricted and Inline graphic are N complex amplitude variables subject to the global power constraint Inline graphic  = const. The coupling strengths are here quenched independent random variables with mean Inline graphic and variance Inline graphic, whose scaling with Inline graphic guarantees an extensive Hamiltonian and thermodynamic convergence. For large Inline graphic, the corresponding probability distribution can be taken Gaussian without loss of generality. Let us also define the degree of disorder Inline graphic and the pumping rate Inline graphic with Inline graphic and Inline graphic, and where β is the inverse of the environment temperature.

This model can be derived in a multimode laser theory for open and irregular random resonators15. The openness of the cavity can be encoded into the definition of the electromagnetic modes using, e.g., the system-and-bath approach of ref. 45, in which the contributions of radiative and localized modes are separated by Feshbach projection46 onto two orthogonal subspaces. This leads to an effective theory on the subspace of localized modes in which they exchange a linear off-diagonal effective damping coupling45,47,48. In terms of the interaction parameters, we also define the strength of the openness as the inverse strength of the nonlinear interaction coupling with respect to the off-diagonal linear coupling Inline graphic. In a closed cavity the linear dumping is absent and it corresponds to α = 1.

In a standard semiclassical approach, the field is expressed in the slow amplitude basis, equation (1), where each mode displays a determined frequency. The lifetimes of these modes are assumed to be much longer than the characteristic times of population inversion and amplification processes, so that the atomic variables can be adiabatically removed and result in an effective interaction between the electromagnetic modes. The nonlinear couplings are, indeed, nonzero only for the terms Inline graphic that meet the frequency matching condition49,50,51,

graphic file with name srep16792-m18.jpg

Inline graphic being the finite linewidth of the modes.

The mean-field approximation of the model equation (2) is exact when the probability distribution of the couplings is the same for all the mode couples (j, k) and tetrads (j, k, l, m). This is true, e.g., when mode extensions scale with the volume occupied by the active medium and their spectrum has a narrow-bandwidth around some given central frequency ω0, i.e., Inline graphic, Inline graphic, so that the frequency matching condition, cf. equation (3), always holds.

Results

The Random Laser Transition

Given the quenched randomness of the Inline graphic’s, any observable depends on the particular realization of the disorder. Thus, the relevant quantity is the disorder averaged free energy Inline graphic, where the overline denotes the average over the distribution of quenched disordered couplings. This can be analytically evaluated using the replica method27,37, as reported in the Methods. In this procedure the evaluation of the relevant thermodynamic quantities is achieved considering Inline graphic identical replicas (i.e., copies) of the system that act as probes exploring the multi-state phase space of the system. Further on, evaluating the distance between the replicas in terms of their similarity, termed overlap, one can retrieve the physical overlaps of the thermodynamic states35.

In the complex amplitude spherical model, equation (2), the order parameter of the replica theory turns out to be given by the overlap between amplitudes of replica a and replica b:

graphic file with name srep16792-m25.jpg

where Inline graphic. This overlap Inline graphic identifies the onset of a RL regime at a given critical value of the pumping, or, otherwise, at a critical temperature at fixed pumping. We notice that the latter behavior is in qualitative agreement with the experimental results of refs 52, 53, 54 where random lasing appears to occur decreasing temperature, besides increasing pumping.

Any nontrivial structure of the values taken by Qab implies that identical copies of the system, with the same interaction network and submitted to the same thermodynamic conditions, show different sets of values for microscopic observables at equilibrium and the ergodicity is broken in distinct equivalent states.

To our knowledge, from an experimental point of view, no phase correlation measurements, required for the evaluation of the complex amplitudes Inline graphic and, consequently, of Inline graphic, is available so far in random media. Only magnitudes Inline graphic are measured and not their phases Inline graphic. The experimental reconstruction of the distribution of the values of equation (4) is, thus, unfeasible.

Real Replicas

In recent experiments44, shot-to-shot fluctuations of intensity spectra in an amorphous solid RL, a functionalized thiophene-based oligomer named thienyl-S,S-dioxide quinquethiophene (T5COx), are measured and analyzed. Since the sample remains under identical experimental conditions shot after shot, Inline graphic different shots of RL emission correspond to Inline graphic real replicas and one can measure the overlap between intensity fluctuations of two real replicas. In these experiments, the set of the activated modes emitting after the shot Inline graphic, whose available coarse-grained degree of freedom is the intensity Inline graphic, is observed to change from shot to shot.

When, during a single shot of the pumping source, the number of stimulated emission processes taking place is very large, the configurations of the mode dynamics can be considered as pertaining to a thermodynamic state. In terms of the photonic bomb language of Letohkov10, e.g., this is a situation in which the typical amplification time is much shorter than the photons lifetime inside the medium, i.e., of the lifetime of stochastic resonators supporting the localized optical modes. The possible observation of numerous different states from shot to shot is, consequently, an evidence of a thermodynamic phase described by a corrugated free energy landscape composed of many valleys separated by barriers.

Intensity Fluctuation Overlap (IFO)

Having as only experimentally available degree of freedom the intensities, one defines a suitable overlap based on their acquisition in different shots. To this aim, one first determines the average emission spectrum Inline graphic. Then, terming Inline graphic the intensity fluctuation of shot a around the average profile, one can define the overlap between the normalized intensity fluctuation of shots a and b as44:

graphic file with name srep16792-m38.jpg

where the index Inline graphic denotes now the frequency, i.e., the experimental accessible equivalent of a mode index, depending on the spectral resolution. The overlap is measured between the fluctuations of intensity, rather than the straight intensities, to exclude the effects due to the amplified spontaneous emission. From Inline graphic measured spectra one can calculate the Inline graphic values of the IFO Inline graphic and its distribution Inline graphic. Its average Inline graphic can be computed by repeated spectral measurements acquired on different samples. By different samples we, actually, mean different realizations of the microscopic disordered realization of scatterers positions as faced by the incoming pumping light beam. More precisely, one can realize a different realization by turning the material sample or, if the beam section is smaller than the random medium, by illuminating a different region with the pump laser spot.

If the variations of the normalization factors Inline graphic in Eq. (5) are neglected with respect to fluctuations Inline graphic, in the 2 + 4 complex amplitude spin-glass model given by equation (2), the matrix

graphic file with name srep16792-m47.jpg

is the model equivalent of the IFO, up to an overall sign. Indeed, equation (6), defined in the dominion [0, 1], holds with the prescription that Inline graphic corresponds to Inline graphic. To compare with experimental results we will use symmetrized Inline graphic, Inline graphic, without any loss of generality.

IFO vs. standard overlap relationship

The average in equation (6) can be carried out using the replicated action derived in the Methods, cf. equation (14). This leads to the following relationship between the IFO and the standard order parameters:

graphic file with name srep16792-m52.jpg

where Inline graphic is defined in equation (4), and

graphic file with name srep16792-m54.jpg

is the parameter of global coherence (cf. Methods). According to equation (7), if a RSB occurs in the standard overlap Inline graphic it propagates with the same structure to the IFO Inline graphic. We, thus, have a theoretical well funded tool to detect RSB in experimental data. We stress that this analysis could have not been possible in Inline graphic models with quenched amplitudes considered in previous works30,31,32 because there the intensities of the modes are kept fixed during the mode dynamics.

In equation (7) we have considered the most general case in which a high pumping regime can display both a global coherence (Inline graphic) and a multi-state non-trivial structure for the amplitude configurations (Inline graphic). This mixing physically occurs for a degree of disorder Inline graphic next to the tolerance value beyond which standard mode locking (SML) breaks down, leaving place to glassy random lasing. This is displayed in the phase diagrams in the central panels of the triptych Figs 1 and 2, as the boundary lines between SML (Inline graphic) and glassy random laser (m = 0 but Inline graphic) at large Inline graphic.

Figure 1. Laser transition triptych in a closed cavity for varying disorder.

Figure 1

In the central panel the phase diagram Inline graphic is displayed for a closed cavity (nonlinearity strength α = 1) in terms of the four possible optical regimes14,15: incoherent wave (IW), standard mode locking (SML), phase locking wave (PLW) and random laser (RL). Two pumping paths across the lasing thresholds are shown as dotted lines, at Inline graphic Inline graphic and Inline graphic Inline graphic. In the left panels Inline graphic to Inline graphic the behavior the distributions of IFO, Inline graphic, and standard overlap, Inline graphic, across the ordered ML laser threshold are reported. The transition is discontinuous in the standard Parisi distribution Inline graphic, whereas Inline graphic is invariant. In the right panels Inline graphic to Inline graphic the IFO and standard overlap distributions are shown for the RL transition: as Inline graphic increases, we show that the low Inline graphic solution is replica symmetric (e), while above threshold it becomes discontinuously 1RSB (f, g, h).

Figure 2. Laser transition triptych in an open cavity for varying disorder.

Figure 2

In the central panel the phase diagram Inline graphic is displayed for an open cavity (nonlinearity strength α = 0.4) in terms of the four possible optical regimes14,15: incoherent wave (IW), standard mode locking (SML), phase locking wave (PLW) and random laser (RL). Two pumping paths across the lasing tresholds are shown as dotted lines, at Inline graphic Inline graphic and Inline graphic Inline graphic. In the left panels Inline graphic to Inline graphic the behavior of IFO and standard overlap distributions across the ordered ML laser threshold are reported. The transition is now continuous in the order parameters Inline graphic, while Inline graphic does not change below and above threshold. In the right panels Inline graphic to Inline graphic the IFO and standard overlap distributions are shown for the RL transition. As Inline graphic increases we show that the low optical power solution is replica symmetric (Inline graphic), soon above threshold the solution is FRSB (f), further increasing Inline graphic the solution becomes 1 + FRSB (g) and, eventually, for large pumping it is 1RSB (h). The transition is continuous in the order parameters Inline graphic.

The low pumping regime is replica symmetric for any Inline graphic, with m = 0 and Qab = 0 for Inline graphic14, implying a Dirac delta probability Inline graphic, peaked in zero, both in the incoherent wave (IW) and in the phase locking wave (PLW) in Figs 1 and 2 (cf. also Methods).

Replica Symmetric standard mode-locking laser

For weak disorder at high pumping Inline graphic, for every Inline graphic the relationship Inline graphic, with Inline graphic, holds between the overlap and the (replica independent) global coherence parameter. In other words, the high pumping laser regime is replica symmetric, as well, and the Inline graphic is a Dirac delta function in zero, once again. The laser regime for negligible disorder (Inline graphic) corresponds to a standard mode-locking laser in an ordered cavity49,50 with spectral resonances equispaced in wavelength and smoothly distributed in intensity. For weak, though not very small, disorder, as, e.g., in the open cavity phase diagram of Fig. 2 (Inline graphic), the laser regime could also correspond to a deterministic (i.e., non-glassy) random laser, with spectral resonances indeed at random wavelengths with random intensities, yet always with the same pattern for each experiment on the same sample under the same external conditions. From a classical statistical mechanics point of view these two cases are equivalent (in terms of the order parameters equations (4,8)) and they are referred simply as SML in the phase diagrams. We will come back to this kind of random lasers when discussing known experimental realizations.

Remarkably, though in terms of the parameter Inline graphic the standard mode locked regime is clearly different from the fluorescence regime, and so is Inline graphic, cf. left panels Inline graphic of Figs 1 and 2 and refs 14,15, the IFO distribution does not change below and above the standard mode-locking transition. This has been observed in preliminary measurements on a Q-switched pulsed Nd-Yag standard laser in ref. 44. Indeed, the overlap of the model in equation (6) is between local fluctuations of intensity on different replicas, so a global ordering is invariably taken away (cf. Methods).

Onset of RSB across the random laser transition

For strong disorder the distribution of the coupling Inline graphic’s yields a non-negligible amount of both positive and negative values, inducing frustration in the modes interaction. Take, for instance and simplicity, three complex amplitudes Inline graphic, pairwise interacting on a triangle. Each of the three bonds connecting the three modes can randomly acquire positive or negative values. Modes connected by positive bonds will tend to align (in the complex plane), whereas modes connected by negative bonds will tend to counter-align. If, e.g., in the triangle two bonds are positive and one negative, no single configuration of modes alignments will satisfy all interactions, minimizing the Hamiltonian. The system will then settle into one of different degenerate configurations with the lowest realizable energy. Frustration is, thus, the impossibility of finding a unique way of satisfying all bonds. Frustration is a necessary condition for the onset of glassiness. When the pumping increases above threshold, Inline graphic, the replica symmetry is broken and the distribution of Inline graphic becomes nontrivial, cf. panels f, g, h in Figs 1 and 2.

Phase Diagrams and Overlap Distributions

Several scenarios are possible at the lasing transitions, exemplified in the paradigmatic cases of Figs 1 and 2. In Fig. 1 we show the phase diagram and the behavior of the overlap distribution Inline graphic and its relative symmetrized IFO distribution Inline graphic in a closed cavity (α = 1) where linear dumping is absent. In Fig. 2 the behavior of Inline graphic and Inline graphic is shown across the laser threshold in an open cavity (α = 0.4 < 1), where the linear dumping is competing with non-linearity. In both the closed and the open cavity scenarios we illustrate two different critical regimes: the onset of standard mode locking at low disorder and the transition to random lasing for large Inline graphic.

In a closed cavity situation, α = 1, Inline graphic is discontinuous at the standard mode-locking laser transition, while Inline graphic is unaffected. In this case the transition itself is discontinuous in the thermodynamic sense: the internal energy14,50 and the coherence parameter Inline graphic (or the overlap Inline graphic) are discontinuous, see left panel of the closed cavity triptych in Fig. 1. Here the distribution Inline graphic has two values trivially linked to the two possible values of the nonzero parameter, Inline graphic. At the RL transition (Inline graphic), alternatively, the Inline graphic, and similarly Inline graphic, changes in a nontrivial way: two different values, a zero and a nonzero one, are possible as the pumping is increased. In this situation the RL regime is one step RSB (1RSB) and the transition is a so-called random first order (RFOT) in glassy physics terming16. In the RFOT scenario the static (ideal) glass transition is preceded by a glassy dynamic arrest (drawn as a dashed line in the central panel of Fig. 1)14,15: a photonic system in this case should show the typical two-step dynamical relaxation for the time correlation function of light modes, in the same universality class of the mode-coupling theory for structural glasses. In this kind of transition there is no latent heat15, yet a new value for the overlap discontinuously appears at the transition, cf. right panel of Fig. 1.

In the cavity-less scenario α = 0.4, instead, Inline graphic is continuous at the ordered ML transition. Indeed, a nonzero value for Inline graphic increases continuously from zero as it can be observed looking at the peaks of Inline graphic in panels a and b of Fig. 2, where Inline graphic. As in the closed cavity scenario, the Inline graphic of the SML does not change across the threshold. At the onset of the RL regime, illustrated in Fig. 2 for Inline graphic, the change in Inline graphic is rather meaningful. At and just above the threshold, Inline graphic displays a continuous part between the central peak in Inline graphic and the two side peaks, as displayed in panel Inline graphic of Fig. 2. Here, the transition is thermodynamically continuous with a RL regime that is of the so-called full replica symmetry breaking (FRSB) kind, associated with a free energy landscape composed by a fractal hierarchy of valleys. As the pumping increases, the regime becomes 1 + FRSB, a combination of 1RSB and FRSB solutions, with both a continuous and a discontinuous contribution to the probability distribution, cf. panel Inline graphic in Fig. 2. The continuous parts in the Inline graphic and Inline graphic depend on the influence of the off-diagonal damping term in Inline graphic in equation (2). For high enough pumping, well-above the threshold, the non-linear term eventually becomes dominant15 and the solution, cf. panel Inline graphic in Fig. 2, eventually becomes 1RSB, as in the closed cavity case, cf. panels f, g, h of Fig. 1.

In the RL experiment of ref. 44 the distribution Inline graphic, with Inline graphic defined in equation (5) is peaked in zero at low pumping, while it becomes nontrivial with a triple and, eventually, double peaked shape as the lasing threshold is overcome. Although in comparison with the theoretical predictions for N → ∞ the peaks of Inline graphic are smeared by noise effects and finite modes’ number effects, in all regimes Inline graphic. In Fig. 3 we display a comparison between the analytic IFO distribution computed in our 2 + 4 complex amplitude spin-glass model, cf. equation (2), in an open cavity and the experimental measurements of Inline graphic in refs 44,55.

Figure 3. Comparison between theory and experiments in a cavity less random laser.

Figure 3

In the top row we display the probability distributions of the IFO for α = 0.4, when linear and nonlinear interactions are competing, Inline graphic and for increasing pumping. Vertical lines represent Dirac’s deltas, whose height is the probability of the argument value. Different regimes are represented from fluorescence to large pumping random lasing. They are chosen along the dotted line in Fig. 2 at Inline graphic. Form left to right the first distribution is at point Inline graphic in Fig. 2, the second between Inline graphic and Inline graphic, the third one between Inline graphic and Inline graphic and the following above Inline graphic. In the bottom row the same regimes are reproduced in the IFO distribution experimentally measured and reported in refs 44,55 in an amorphous solid oligomeric random laser, T5COx.

Discussion

In this work we provide the theoretical analytical background for a recently introduced order parameter44 that allows to probe the phenomenon known as replica symmetry breaking in random lasers by means of experimentally accessible observables. These are shot-to-shot intensity fluctuations and the order parameter is the distribution of the values of the overlap between intensity fluctuations in different shots, as analytically defined in equation (6). Replica symmetry breaking is a known property occurring in mean-field glasses, spin-glasses and hard optimization problems. The parameters of the theory have never been measured, though, in any real system in these fields. In, particular, no measurement of the overlap and its distribution has been provided. The only experimental measure, so far, of a quantity possibly related to the standard RSB overlap been recently carried out on a photonic system. The system is an amplifying and scattering random medium, the T5COx44 displaying random lasing at high pumping. The parameter is the distribution of the shot-to-shot intensity fluctuations overlap (IFO). In the framework of a recently introduced general statistical mechanics theory of random photonic systems4, in equation (21) we give here an analytic proof of the relationship between the IFO and the standard overlap, equation (4), and we provide measurable predictions for its behavior in both ordered and random lasing systems below and above threshold and, furthermore, both in the cases of discontinuous and continuous transitions to the laser regime at the threshold. In particular, the transition in the probability IFO distribution of a random laser is shown to be discontinuous (cf. Fig. 1) for closed (or controllable, limited open) cavities while it becomes continuous (cf. Fig. 2) for highly open cavity nonlinear wave systems. In the cavity-less case, where experimental measurements are available in at least one case, in Fig. 3 we compare theoretical and experimental behavior of the distributions of the IFO Inline graphic from low to high pumping.

According to our results, a RSB is to be expected only, though not always, in random lasers whose random configurations of scatterers are fixed, i.e. quenched, for all analyzed shots. That is, the dynamics of their positions evolves on time-scales much longer than the whole experiment and real replicas can be realized. This is the experimental case of the solid/powder samples of random lasers as GaAs powders54,56, core-shell colloidal CdSe/ZnS quantum dots57, ZnO powders58 or pressurized pellets25, and polymeric substances44,59,60.

Displaying fixed scatterers to realize real replicas is not sufficient to yield a glassy random laser, though. Indeed, as we previously discussed in the Results section, frustration is also necessary. A notable example of a frustration-less solid random laser might be porous gallium phosphide (GaP) filled with a solution of Rhodamine and methanol61,62, in which spectral fluctuations are reported to be minimal and the structure of the resonances, though random, appears to be reproducible from shot to shot. IFO measurements might yield, in this case, an ordered-like Inline graphic, peaked in zero both below and above threshold, as in the phase reported as SML in the diagram of Fig. 2 for Inline graphic.

On the other hand, experiments on optically active random media whose scatterer particles sensitively move between subsequent shots in a single experiment, as in liquid solutions of Rhodamine and methanol with particles of Titanium oxide63, Zinc oxide64, pure Titania65, or colloidal CdSe quantum dots66 could establish no real replicas. Not having the same quenched disorder in all shots might prevent the observation of RSB. The overlap between copies of systems with different realizations of the disordered couplings, indeed, is known to be replica symmetric, as it has been shown in models with continuous spherical variables67, of which our model in equation (2) is a generalization. Similarly to what happens in the ordered ML case, cf. left panels of Figs 1 and 2, in that case the occurrence of a trivial single peaked Inline graphic in Inline graphic is expected, both below and above Inline graphic. Such a behavior has been observed in a liquid system of TiO2 scattering nano-particle suspensions in solution of Rhodamine and methanol44.

Eventually, we would like to stress that, besides a rigorous interpretation of recent experimental results for random lasers in terms of replica theory, our results provide an exciting and easily available test of spin-glass theory properties in continuous systems without local magnitude constraints, as disordered photonic systems.

Methods

Replica Theory and Order Parameters

The most complicated system that we are considering in our theory is a random system with disordered mode couplings that possibly display a high pumping/low temperature phase with ergodicity breaking and the occurrence of very many states. By “very many” we mean that their number scales with the size of the system, i.e. the number Inline graphic of optically active modes. These states are not related by any simple relationship among them. That is, e.g., no simple Inline graphic spin reversal symmetry occurs between states, as in the Ising model, nor Inline graphic symmetry as in the XY model. In the complex glassy case, to probe the multi-state disordered thermodynamic phase, one, thus, considers Inline graphic copies of the system with exactly the same set of disordered couplings, the Inline graphic’s, and evaluates the disorder averaged partition function Inline graphic of the replicated system. A continuation to real Inline graphic is, then, taken to evaluate

graphic file with name srep16792-m128.jpg

As a result, F is expressed as a functional in the replica space of the overlap matrices

graphic file with name srep16792-m129.jpg
graphic file with name srep16792-m130.jpg

Inline graphic being replica indexes. The diagonal parts are

graphic file with name srep16792-m132.jpg

by definition of the total power constraint, and

graphic file with name srep16792-m133.jpg

yielding information about global phase coherence. This parameter discriminates between the IW (R = 0) and the PLW (R > 0) regimes (cf. Figs 1 and 2), in which all the other parameters are identical14.

Alternatively, writing Inline graphic, we can define the overlaps of the real parts σ or the imaginary parts τ of the complex amplitudes:

graphic file with name srep16792-m135.jpg

As the system size becomes sufficiently large, the free energy sample-to-sample fluctuations die out and the free energy, equation (9), becomes independent of disorder, i.e., it is self- averaging. For N → ∞ the physical value of the matrices follows from the extremization of the free energy functional. Because of the fact that the number of independent elements of an overlap matrix is Inline graphic (taken away the diagonal) in the limit n → 0 the usual minimization of the thermodynamic potential actually becomes a maximization in the space of the overlap matrices. To maximize F, a non-trivial Ansatz on the structure of Q and R is necessary. Indeed, it can be shown14 that the most intuitive replica symmetric solution, with Qab and Rab independent of a and b, does not lead to a thermodynamically stable solution in the whole phase space: beyond the critical point, in the glassy phase, one must, hence, resort to spontaneous RSB. Following the Parisi scheme27 the overlap matrices are, then, taken Inline graphic-step RSB matrix, with Inline graphic for a continuous full RSB (FRSB). These are block matrices where the number of inner blocks Inline graphic corresponds to the number of hierarchical levels in the multi-state phase space.

Depending on the value of J2,4 the solution of the RL model Eq. (2) displays phases with different RSB structures, ranging from 1RSB, FRSB to a combination of discontinuous one step and continuous breaking (1 + FRSB)68.

Replicated Action

In the replica formalism, the averages of an observable Inline graphic over the equilibrium Gibbs distribution and over the quenched disorder can be written as

graphic file with name srep16792-m141.jpg

where the average Inline graphic in the replica space is evaluated with the replicated action

graphic file with name srep16792-m143.jpg

Here we have introduced the matrices

graphic file with name srep16792-m144.jpg

and the effective fields

graphic file with name srep16792-m145.jpg

These are functions of the global coherence parameters

graphic file with name srep16792-m146.jpg

analogous to the magnetization for spin models, with coefficients Inline graphic, Inline graphic. After some algebra (see ref. 15 for details), the field Inline graphic can be expressed as

graphic file with name srep16792-m150.jpg

For weak disorder (low Inline graphic) the global coherence Inline graphic is non-zero above the lasing threshold and must be included into the description. If disorder is strong, though, in the frozen glassy phase, the global coherence is null: Inline graphic.

Because it turns out that Inline graphic14,15, the integrals in the σ, τ space factorize and the IFO Inline graphic defined in equation (6) takes the form

graphic file with name srep16792-m156.jpg

where Inline graphic and Inline graphic, since single replica quantities do not depend on the replica index.

The replicated action Inline graphic given in equation (14) is quadratic. Thus, using the Wick’s theorem, for the averages in equation (19) we easily obtain

graphic file with name srep16792-m160.jpg

Equation (20) can be further simplified since the physical solutions of the model are either of the form Inline graphic or Inline graphic (a ≠ b). Since the two solutions are equivalent, without loss of generality we choose the first one, so that Inline graphic and equation (20) leads to

graphic file with name srep16792-m164.jpg
graphic file with name srep16792-m165.jpg

where Inline graphic is defined in equation (4),

graphic file with name srep16792-m167.jpg

is the parameter of partial coherence, cf. equation (12), and

graphic file with name srep16792-m168.jpg

is the parameter of global coherence14,15. Equation (21) is one of our main results and is discussed in the main text, cf. equation (7).

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Antenucci, F. et al. The glassy random laser: replica symmetry breaking in the intensity fluctuations of emission spectra. Sci. Rep. 5, 16792; doi: 10.1038/srep16792 (2015).

Acknowledgments

We thank Silvio Franz for stimulating this work and for interesting discussions. The research leading to these results has received funding from the People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007-2013/ under REA grant agreement n. 290038, NETADIS project, from the European Research Council through ERC grant agreement no. 247328 - CriPheRaSy project - and from the Italian MIUR under the Basic Research Investigation Fund FIRB2008 program, grant No. RBFR08M3P4, and under the PRIN2010 program, grant code 2010HXAW77-008.

Footnotes

Author Contributions F.A., A.C. and L.L. conceived the theory, performed the computations and wrote the manuscript.

References

  1. Redding B., Choma M. A. & Cao H. Speckle-free laser imaging using random laser illumination. Nature Photon. 6, 497 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Redding B. & Cao H. Using a multimode fiber as a high-resolution low-loss spectrometer. Opt. Lett. 37, 3384 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Redding B., Popoff S. M. & Cao H. All-fiber spectrometer based on speckle pattern reconstruction. Opt. Expr. 21, 6584 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Redding B., Liew S. F., Sarma R. & Cao H. Compact spectrometer based on a disordered photonic chip. Nature Photon. 7, 746 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  5. John S. & Pang G. Theory of lasing in a multiple-scattering medium. Phys. Rev. A 54, 3642–3652 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Horstmeyer R., Judkewitz B., Vellekoop I. M., Assawaworrarit S. & Yang C. H. Physical key-protected one-time pad. Sci. Rep. 3, 3543 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ambartsumyan R. V., Basov N. G., Kryukov P. G. & Lethokov V. S. A Laser with Nonresonant. Feedback. JETP 24, 481 (1967). [Google Scholar]
  8. Ambartsumyan R. V., Kryukov P. G. & Lethokov V. S. Dynamics of Emission Line Narrowing for a Laser with Nonresonant. Feedback. JETP 24, 1129 (1967). [Google Scholar]
  9. Ambartsumyan R. V., Kryukov P. G., Lethokov V. S. & Matveets Y. A. Statistical Emission Properties of a Nonresonant. Feedback Laser. JETP 26, 1109 (1968). [Google Scholar]
  10. Letokhov V. Generation of light by a scattering medium with negative resonance absorption. Soviet JETP 26, 835 (1968). [Google Scholar]
  11. Markushev V. M., Zolin V. F. & Briskina C. M. Luminescence and stimulated emission of neodymium in sodium lanthanum molybdate powders. Sov. J. Quantum Elec. 16, 281 (1986). [Google Scholar]
  12. Gouedard C, Husson D, Sauteret C, Auzel F & Migus A. Generation of spatially incoherent short pulses in laser-pumped neodymium stoichiometric crystals and powders. JOSA B 10, 2358–2363 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  13. Wiersma D. S. & Lagendijk A. Light diffusion with gain and random lasers. Phys. Rev. E 54, 4256–4265 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Antenucci F., Conti C., Crisanti A. & Leuzzi L. General Phase Diagram of Multimodal Ordered and Disordered Lasers in Closed and Open Cavities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 043901 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Antenucci F., Crisanti A. & Leuzzi L. The complex spherical spin 2 + 4 spin-glass model: applications to optics. Phys. Rev. A 91, 053816 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  16. Parisi G. Spin glasses and fragile glasses: Statics, dynamics, and complexity. PNAS 103, 7948 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Skipetrov S. E. & Maynard R. Instabilities of waves in nonlinear disordered media. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 736 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Anglos D. et al. Random laser action in organic-inorganic nanocomposites. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 21, 208–213 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  19. Van der Molen K. L., Mosk A. P. & Lagendijk A. Intrinsic intensity uctuations in random lasers. Phys. Rev. A 74, 053808 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  20. Lepri S., Cavalieri S., Oppo G.-L. & Wiersma D. S. Statistical regimes of random laser uctuations. Phys. Rev. A 75, 063820 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  21. Mujumdar S., Türeci V., Torre R. & Wiersma D. S. Chaotic behavior of a random laser with static disorder. Phys. Rev. A 76, 033807 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  22. Fallert J. et al. Co-existence of strongly and weakly localized random laser modes. Nat. Photon. 3, 279282 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  23. Cao H. et al. Ultraviolet Lasing in Resonators Formed by Scattering in Semiconductor Polycrystalline Films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 3656–3658 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  24. Ling Y. et al. Investigation of Random Lasers with Resonant Feedback. Phys. Rev. A 64, 063808 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Cao H., Ling Y., Xu J. Y., Cao C. Q. & Kumar P. Photon Statistics of Random Lasers with Resonant Feedback. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4524–4527 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nakamura T. et al. Origins of lasing emission in a resonance-controlled ZnO random laser. New J. Phys. 16, 093054 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  27. Mézard M., Parisi G. & Virasoro M. A. Spin glass theory and beyond (World Scientific, Singapore, 1987). [Google Scholar]
  28. Guerra F. In New Trends in Mathematical Physics 299–311 (Springer, Berlin (Germany), 2009). [Google Scholar]
  29. Talagrand M. Mean Field Models for Spin Glasses (Springer, Berlin, 2011). [Google Scholar]
  30. Angelani L., Conti C., Ruocco G. & Zamponi F. Glassy Behavior of Light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 065702 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Angelani L., Conti C., Ruocco G. & Zamponi F. Glassy behavior of light in random lasers. Phys. Rev. B 74, 104207 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Leuzzi L., Conti C., Folli V., Angelani L. & Ruocco G. Phase Diagram and Complexity of Mode-Locked Lasers: From Order to Disorder. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 083901 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Conti C. & Leuzzi L. Complexity of waves in nonlinear disordered media. Phys. Rev. B 83, 134204 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  34. Parisi G. Infinite Number of Order Parameters for Spin-Glasses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1754–1756 (1979). [Google Scholar]
  35. Parisi G. Order Parameter for Spin-Glasses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1946–1948 (1983). [Google Scholar]
  36. Parisi G. Lack of Ergodicity in the Infinite-Range Ising Spin-Glass. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 301–304 (1982). [Google Scholar]
  37. Edwards S. F. & Anderson P. W. Theory of spin glasses. J. Phys. F 5, 965 (1975). [Google Scholar]
  38. Sherrington D. & Kirkpatrick S. Solvable Model of a Spin-Glass. Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1792–1796 (1975). [Google Scholar]
  39. Mézard M. & Parisi G. A first principle computation of the thermodynamics of glasses. J. Chem. Phys. 111, 1076 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  40. Parisi G. & Zamponi F. Mean field theory of hard sphere glasses and jamming. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 789 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  41. Caltagirone F. et al. Critical Slowing Down Exponents of Mode Coupling Theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 085702 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Franz S., Jacquin H., Parisi G., Urbani P. & Zamponi F. Quantitative field theory of the glass transition. PNAS 109, 18725 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Charbonneau P., Kurchan J., Parisi G., Urbani P. & Zamponi F. Fractal free energy landscapes in structural glasses. Nat. Commun. 5, 3725 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Ghofraniha N. et al. Experimental evidence of replica symmetry breaking in random lasers. Nat. Commun. 6, 6058 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Viviescas C. & Hackenbroich G. Field quantization for open optical cavities. Phys. Rev. A 67, 013805 (1 2003). [Google Scholar]
  46. Feshbach H. A unified theory of nuclear reactions. II. Ann. Phys. 19, 287–313 (1962). [Google Scholar]
  47. Hackenbroich G., Viviescas C. & Haake F. Field Quantization for Chaotic Resonators with Overlapping Modes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 083902 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Viviescas C. & Hackenbroich G. Quantum theory of multimode fields: applications to optical resonators. J. Opt. B 6, 211 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  49. Haus H. A. Mode-Locking of Lasers. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 6, 1173–1185 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  50. Gordon A. & Fischer B. Phase Transition Theory of Many-Mode Ordering and Pulse Formation in Lasers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 103901 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Antenucci F., Iba~nez Berganza M. & Leuzzi L. Statistical physical theory of mode-locking laser generation with a frequency comb. Phys. Rev. A 91, 043811 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  52. Wiersma D. S. & Cavalieri S. Light emission: a temperature-tunable random laser. Nature 414, 6865 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Wiersma D. S. & Cavalieri S. Light emission: a temperature-tunable random laser. Phys. Rev. E 66, 056612 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Nakamura T., Takahashi T. & Adachi S. Temperature dependence of GaAs random laser characteristics. Phys. Rev. B 81, 125324 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  55. Ghofraniha N. et al. Corrigendum: Experimental evidence of replica symmetry breaking in random lasers. Nat. Commun. 6, 6300 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Noginov M. A., Zhu G., Fowlkes I. & Bahoura M. GaAs random laser. Laser Phys. Lett. 1, 291293 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  57. Chen Y. et al. Colloidal quantum dot random laser. Opt. Expr. 19, 2996 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Cao H. et al. Random Laser Action in Semiconductor Powder. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2278–2281 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  59. W. L. C., Wong K. S., Huang J. D., Frolov S. V. & Vardeny Z. V. Femtosecond time-resolved laser action in polyphenylene vinylene films: stimulated emission in an inhomogeneously broadened exciton distribution. Chem. Phys. Lett. 314, 564569 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  60. Anni M. et al. Modes interaction and light transport in bidimensional organic random lasers in the weak scattering limit. Phys. Rev. B 70, 195216 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  61. Van der Molen K. L., Tjerkstra R. W., Mosk A. P. & Lagendijk A. Spatial Extent of Random Laser Modes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 143901 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. El-Dardiry R. G. S., Mosk A., Muskens O. L. & Lagendijk A. Experimental studies on the mode structure of random lasers. Phys. Rev. A 81, 043830 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  63. Lawandy N. M., M. B. R., Gomes A. S. L. & Sauvain E. Laser action in strongly scattering media. 368, 436–438 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  64. Cao H., Xu J. Y., Chang S.-H. & Ho S. T. Transition from amplified spontaneous emission to laser action in strongly scattering media. Phys. Rev. E 61, 1985 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. El-Dardiry R. G. S., Mooiweer R. & Lagendijk A. Experimental phase diagram for random laser spectra. New J. Phys. 14, 113031 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  66. Augustine A. K., Radhakrishnan P., Nampoori V. P. N. & Kailasnath M. Enhanced random lasing from a colloidal CdSe quantum dot-Rh6G system. Laser Phys. Lett. 12, 025006 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  67. Chen H.-W. W.-K. andi Hsieh, Hwang C.-R. & Sheu Y.-C. Disorder Chaos in the Spherical Mean-Field Model. J. Stat. Phys. 160, 417–429 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  68. Crisanti A. & Leuzzi L. Exactly solvable spin glass models with ferromagnetic couplings: The spherical multi-p-spin model in a self-induced field. Nucl. Phys. B 870, 176 (2013). [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES