Abstract
Blastocystis is a common protist isolated in humans and many animals. The parasite is a species complex composed of 19 subtypes, 9 of which have been found in humans. There are biological and molecular differences between Blastocystis subtypes although microscopy alone is unable to distinguish between these subtypes. Blastocystis isolates also display various morphological forms. Several of these forms, however, have not been properly evaluated on whether or not these play significant functions in the organism's biology. In this study, we used imaging flow cytometry to analyze morphological features of Blastocystis isolates representing 3 subtypes (ST1, ST4 and ST7). We also employed fluorescence dyes to discover new cellular features. The profiles from each of the subtypes exhibit considerable differences with the others in terms of shape, size and granularity. We confirmed that the classical vacuolar form comprises the majority in all three subtypes. We have also evaluated other morphotypes on whether these represent distinct life stages in the parasite. Irregularly-shaped cells were identified but all of them were found to be dying cells in one isolate. Granular forms were present as a continuum in both viable and non-viable populations, with non-viable forms displaying higher granularity. By analyzing the images, rare morphotypes such as multinucleated cells could be easily observed and quantified. These cells had low granularity and lower DNA content. Small structures containing nucleic acid were also identified. We discuss the possible biological implications of these unusual forms.
Introduction
Blastocystis spp. are protistan parasites found in humans and many types of animals. It is the most commonly isolated eukaryote in humans [1,2]. Blastocystis is a species complex comprising 19 subtypes (STs). ST1-9 have been found in humans and, with the exception of ST9, in other animal hosts as well. Blastocystis ST1 and ST3 are most frequently isolated, but there is geographical diversity in global distribution. For example, ST4 is common in Europe but not in the rest of the world [3]. ST2 and ST6 had a higher occurrence than ST3 in a study in Colombia [4] and ST4 has not been detected at all. This was also the case in a study in Argentina [5]. ST9 had the lowest occurrence and was only found in Denmark and Japan [3]. Subtypes of Blastocystis can be determined by genetic analyses, but STs also exhibit differences in size, morphology, growth in culture, host range, drug resistance, host immune response, adhesion to host cells and protease activities [6–10]. Studies have also indicated that ST identity may determine symptomatology and pathogenic potential [5,11]. While its pathogenicity is still yet to be elucidated, Blastocystis has been associated with gastrointestinal diseases [11]. It has also been implicated in waterborne disease outbreaks [12,13]. Due to its ubiquity and numerous animal hosts, it has the potential to be a threat in public health.
The conventional method for detection of Blastocystis is by microscopic observation in clinical (mainly fecal specimens) and environmental samples. This method, however, is not adequate to differentiate Blastocystis STs [6,14,15]. Under the microscope, Blastocystis appear round with a prominent central vacuole. The cytoplasm is usually located at the edges where the nucleus (or several nuclei) and other organelles can be found. Granular forms can also be observed and some multi-vacuolar forms have been reported [6,16]. Irregularly-shaped cells are also seen and these have been labelled as amoeboid forms in some studies [6,16,17].
There have been controversies on the life cycle of Blastocystis [18–21]. This is partly due to the unknown status of several morphological forms observed both in culture and clinical samples. For example, multivacuolar forms have been thought as Blastocystis undergoing multiple fission or schizogony similar to what happens in other protistan parasites [18]. There are also suggestions that amoeboid forms may undergo plasmotomy [22]. Whether or not granular forms have specific biological functions is still yet to be discovered [16]. There was also a report on granular amoeboid forms expelling small granules in xenic cultures [16]. The authors however did not investigate further if these granules represent reproductive stages. Currently, only binary fission has been accepted as the type of reproduction in Blastocystis since only this mode has been observed. Other investigators also suggest that other forms may be artefacts and do not represent reproductive stages [1,6,23]. There is, however, an interest on looking for alternative modes of reproduction. For some, binary fission alone could not explain the high number of cells in cultures and in fecal specimens [18]. Just like the parable of the blind men and the elephant, various groups have reported on distinct forms without taking into consideration the morphological complexity of the parasite. This often leads to biases and confusion in the Blastocystis field. There is therefore a need to evaluate morphological forms exhibited by Blastocystis in terms of their biological importance.
In this study, we used an imaging flow cytometer to survey the morphological characteristics of 3 Blastocystis subtypes (ST1, ST4 and ST7). The Amnis ImageStream Mark II is capable of acquiring thousands of images in a sample. These images can then be analyzed based on specific characteristics such as size, aspect ratio, fluorescence staining intensity, etc. We applied this technique to characterize morphological features such as shape, size, granularity and location of nuclei that can differentiate one subtype from the others. We also used fluorescence dyes to visualize cellular structures such as vacuoles and nuclei. We then calculated for the proportions of cells showing these features. This study is the first to provide a comprehensive and unbiased overview of the various morphological forms of Blastocystis in culture and sheds new light on the roles of certain forms of the parasite.
Methods
Parasite Axenic Cultivation
Blastocystis NUH9, WR1 and B isolates were maintained in 9ml Hyclone Iscove's Modified Dulbecco Medium (IMDM) (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Logan, UT) supplemented with 10% horse serum (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY). These isolates were previously axenized [24–26]. NUH9 was isolated during a health screening from an asymptomatic patient [26]; WR1 from Wistar rat [24]; and B from a patient complaining of diarrhea [25,27]. Blastocystis complete medium were pre-reduced for at least 12 hrs before use. Culture tubes were kept in in 5-L anaerobic jars with anaerogen gas pack (Oxoid, Basingtoke, UK) at 37°C.
Ethics Statement
Blastocystis isolate B was obtained from an existing collection at the Department of Microbiology of the National University of Singapore (NUS). Human isolates were obtained from patients at the Singapore General Hospital in the early 1990s, before Institutional Review Board was established in NUS. NUH9 was isolated in 2007 from stool samples submitted for routine heath screening and approval from the National Healthcare Group Institutional Review Board was obtained before project commencement. All samples were anonymized.
Subtyping of Blastocystis Isolates
The isolates were previously genotyped using primers based on the organism's small sub-unit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) gene [26,28]. We also confirmed the isolates' subtypes using PCR protocol based on DNA from the parasite's mitochondria-like organelle (MLO) [29]. Total DNA were extracted from 1 x 106 cells using Qiagen DNA stool kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer's instructions. PCR was perfomed using Q5 High-Fidelity 2X Master Mix (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA) with 500 ng of DNA sample. All PCR runs were completed using BioRad iQ5 thermocyler (Hercules, CA). PCR products were sequenced and compared to National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (USA) nucleotide sequence database to confirm subtype identities.
Fluorescence Staining and Imaging Flow Cytometry
In order to analyze cultures at the same stage of growth, 2-day old cultures of Blastocystis isolates WR1 and B and 7-day old culture of isolate NUH9 were harvested. The cells were washed twice by centrifugation at 1,000 x g using warm PBS. 2 x 107 cells in 200 μL PBS were collected into 1.5 μL microtubes. The cell suspensions were then stained with 1 μg/mL propidium iodide (PI) (BioVision, Mountain View, CA), 5 μM carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) (Life Technologies, Eugene, OR) and 1 μg/mL Hoechst 33342 (Life Technologies, Eugene, OR) for 15 mins. PI stain was used to select for viable and non-viable cells. Cells will only take up PI when there is membrane disruption. CFSE is used in proliferation studies and is found to stain vacuolar compartments of Blastocystis [8]. Hoechst stains the DNA and is useful for cell-cycle analyses. Actively dividing cells will have higher emission while dying cells undergoing DNA fragmentation will have lower fluorescence readings. The cells were then washed to remove excess stains and fixed in 2% formaldehyde. Single stained cells were also prepared and used to create a compensation matrix. Blastocystis cell suspension heated to 80°C for 15 mins was used as positive control for PI-staining. We used Amnis ImageStream MarkII (Merck Millipore, Seattle, WA) with 4-laser attachment (375, 488, 561 and 642) to acquire Blastocystis cell images. 2,000 events were obtained with low flow speed at 60x magnification. Images at extended depth of field (EDF) setting were also acquired. EDF involves deconvolution to obtain highly focused images. Gating strategy involved selecting for focused cells using RMS gradient values, then for single cells using brightfield aspect ratio (Fig 1). Viable Blastocystis cells were identified as those without PI-staining. Cell shapes were characterized using aspect ratios from brightfield and CFSE staining. Acquisition was done using 3 different batches of cultures. Analysis of images was performed using IDEAS software version 6.1.
Statistical Analyses
The proportion of populations based on shape and granularity were analysed for significant differences using Student’s two-tailed T-test. Hoechst-staining differences between groups based on circularity were analysed for significance using ANOVA. Statistical analyses were done using GraphPad Prism 5.0
Results and Discussion
Blastocystis cultures of NUH9, WR1 and B isolates were harvested at the log phase of their corresponding growth curves. NUH9 has the slowest growth rate and cultures from this isolate were harvested after 7 days. Two-day old WR1 and B cultures were collected and used in the experiment. Subtyping of the isolates using MLO-based primers confirmed the identities of the isolates used: NUH9 is ST1, WR1 is ST4 and B is ST7. This step also made certain that each culture contain only one isolate/ST and was not contaminated by others.
Using imaging flow cytometry, both round and irregular shapes were found in all Blastocystis isolates (Figs 2A and 3). The proportion of these shapes however differs from one subtype to another. Viable Blastocystis ST1-NUH9 is exclusively round, but only 76% round (the rest are irregular) in non-viable cells. Viable Blastocystis ST4-WR1 and ST7-B isolates are 83% and 92% round-shaped, respectively. These proportions are slightly lower (82% for ST4-WR1 and 88% for ST7-B) in non-viable cells (Fig 2B).
Several studies have attached significance to amoeboid forms in terms of reproduction and pathogenicity and these appear as irregularly-shaped cells [13,20]. These reports however did not identify the subtype of Blastocystis they have observed. Past studies also did not take into account the viability of the cells being observed. In this study, we were able to analyze morphological features of Blastocystis while determining their viability using PI-staining. We found that irregularly-shaped cells in ST1 are non-viable and therefore may not have any biological significance in this particular Blastocystis subtype. ST4 and ST7 isolates, on the other hand, have viable irregularly-shaped cells. This irregularity are due either to the cells' elongated shape or due to amoeboid features such as pseudopod-like structures (Fig 3). In our analyses, these amoeboid forms are rare among viable populations as most irregularly-shaped cells (especially in ST4) are elongated (Fig 3). In ST1 and ST4, these forms are more numerous but all are non-viable. Analysis of cells from viable ST7 isolates showed only one cell (out of ~1000 cells) that could be characterized as amoeboid (Fig 3). Experiments using different ages of cultures may be done in the future to determine the consistency of these rare cells in the population. Likewise, xenic cultures can also be investigated as suggested [30] noting that amoeboid forms may be more numerous in this type of culture condition.
Analysis of single Hoechst-staining was also done to further correlate Blastocystis shape and reproductive status. Hoechst-staining is used for cell-cycle analysis. Actively dividing cells register higher fluorescence compared to inert cells. In all the isolates studied, round-shaped cells had higher average Hoechst-staining (Fig 4). This finding links well with the observation using PI-staining that most irregularly-shaped may not have biological or reproductive roles at all.
Aside from the round vacuolar forms, round granular forms are also commonly observed in clinical samples and in cultures [6,16]. Vdovenko [23] observed that these forms can naturally arise from vacuolar forms possibly by environmental exposure or fixation artefact. A more recent study has also mentioned this phenomenon [16]. In this study, we used the side-scatter channel to measure granularity of the cells. The average intensity coming from the channel in all STs in non-viable cells are higher compared to viable cells. Cells that are more granular can be found mostly among non-viable cells (Fig 5A). Non-viable cells have wider range in terms of granularity in contrast to viable cells where these tend to have lower side-scatter channel intensity. These findings are consistent among the 3 STs studied (Fig 5B). Nevertheless, cells that are more granular can also be found among viable cells. Our data suggests that there exists two populations of granular cells: true granular cells and those that are degenerating (Fig 5C) as reported previously [1,23]. We also add that granularity of these dying cells may be due more to environmental exposure rather than caused by fixation since we have observed the same proportion of granular forms in both fixed and unfixed samples (data not shown). We also used the Hoechst staining intensity of viable granular cells to find their biological significance. We have observe that these cells have higher DNA content compared to granular ones (Fig 6) These cells may therefore be in a more active reproductive state compared to less granular ones. We also analysed the granularity of multinucleated cells.
The diameter of Blastocystis vacuolar forms have been estimated to be between 2 and 200 μm [6]. A study MacPherson and MacQueen [31] indicated that the diameter of 80.8% of the Blastocystis they observed fell between 5 and 15 μm. This paper, however, was published before the genotyping era and so the particular ST of the isolate is unknown. In this study, we determined the size ranges of viable cells in each of the three subtypes. ST1-NUH9 and ST7-B isolates are bigger compared to ST4-WR1 isolates (Table 1). Furthermore, more than half (51.7%) of ST1-NUH9 cells have diameter of greater than or equal to 5 μm while only 37.3% of ST7-B cells have this size. ST4-WR1 cells are generally small with diameter of less than 5 μm in 98.3% of the population. Mirza et al. have previously reported differences in sizes between ST4 and ST7 isolates using flow cytometry [32]. In that study, the diameter of majority of Blastocystis cells after 48 hours of culture were 6 to 10 μm and 3 to 6 μm for ST7 and ST4 isolates, respectively. The calculations made for ST4 in this study mirrors that of the previous report. However, the measurement in this study for ST7 is smaller. The previous study has determined the sizes indirectly using known-sized beads and set them as standards for the forward scatter channel values in flow cytometry. This study however makes use of actual images of the cells and converting the pixel measurements to micrometers. We were also able to exclude doublets in measurement. There might be bigger-sized cells depending on the type and age of samples as well the amount of initial inoculum. Our analyses highlight the importance of taking into account the subtype used in any morphological studies. Our data suggest that the size range of Blastocystis is not as wide as between 2 and 200 μm, but narrower when ST identity is established. We also specifically measured viable cells only as the non-viable cells may feature degenerating cells and assume irregular shapes (Table 1).
Table 1. Viable Blastocystis size profiles indicated by cell diameter range and average diameter.
Subtype-Isolate | Diameter Range (μm) | Average Diameter (μm) | Cells with diameter ≥ 5 μm (%) |
---|---|---|---|
ST1-NUH9 | 2.7–8.7 | 5.0 ± 0.8 | 51.7 ± 6.1 |
ST4-WR1 | 2.2–6.2 | 3.6 ± 0.6 | 1.7 ± 0.4 |
ST7-B | 3.2–7.5 | 4.9 ± 0.7 | 37.3 ± 4.5 |
We used Hoechst staining and the EDF setting of the imaging flow cytometer to analyze nuclear arrangement of viable Blastocystis cells. More than 80% of the population from the three subtypes studied featured 1–2 nuclei (Fig 7) located at the edge of the cells. ST4-WR1 isolates all feature one or two nuclei (and not more). This reflects the previous observation [31] whereby 98.4% of the cells have a similar arrangement. This study therefore supports the classical representation of Blastocystis. More infrequently, in the other STs (1–2% in ST1 and 2–8% in ST7), other nuclear features were observed. These cells either show more than 2 nuclei or that the nucleic acid stain covers a large area of the cell (Fig 8). The latter show an apparent nucleic acid condensation which may represent cells about to undergo binary fission. Surprisingly, we have observed multinucleation only in round cells in these two subtypes. We did not find evidence to support alternative modes of reproduction such as plasmotomy and budding in Blastocystis as suggested by others [16,18,22] since we did not observe multinucleation in irregularly-shaped viable cells. Some of the multinucleated cells show the nuclei located in the center of the cell with the size of the central vacuole diminished (as indicated by lower intensity of CFSE staining) (Fig 8A). If this is a reproductive stage, it may be an evidence of a multiple fission event in Blastocystis as suggested [33]. These, however, showed lower granularity (Fig 9). Cells with single or two nuclei also showed higher DNA content. This is consistent with the data above (Fig 6) and these suggests that multinucleated cells may not be in active reproductive stage as compared to the other cells. We have also observed small structures containing nucleic acid (Fig 8B). These structures are rare (2–4% of viable cells). They also do not appear to have vacuoles as indicated by low CFSE staining but consist mainly of nucleic acid material in its compartment. Our experiments did not determine whether these structures originate from bigger and multinucleated cells. It may also be possible that these represent starving cells or a state where Blastocystis sheds off its vacuole.
Conclusions
In this study, we analyzed three STs of Blastocystis based on shape, size, granularity and nuclear arrangement using high content imaging flow cytometry. These features may be used to compare one Blastocystis ST to another. We have also identified rare multi-nuclear forms which are unlikely to represent an alternative mode of reproduction in the parasite. It would be interesting to investigate other isolates coming from the same or other STs so that inter- and intra-subtype variations in morphology can be determined. We used axenic cultures of Blastocystis but it would also be attractive to investigate cells from xenic cultures or from fecal samples. The methods outlined in this study can also be used to detect changes in Blastocystis upon treatment of drugs or modification of culture conditions. Data from this study provides an important and useful reference on the morphological profile of Blastocystis STs.
Supporting Information
Data Availability
Data are from the Blastocystis ImageStream study may be assessed at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.32605.
Funding Statement
The work was generously funded by a grant from the National University of Singapore (R-182-000-710-733). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. JAY acknowledges the generous research scholarship from the National University of Singapore.
References
- 1. Clark CG, van der Giezen M, Alfellani MA, Stensvold CR. Chapter One—Recent Developments in Blastocystis Research In: Rollinson D., editor. Advances in Parasitology. Academic Press; 2013. p. 1–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Scanlan PD, Stensvold CR, Rajilić-Stojanović M, Heilig HGHJ, De Vos WM, O’Toole PW, et al. The microbial eukaryote Blastocystis is a prevalent and diverse member of the healthy human gut microbiota. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2014. October 1;90(1):326–30. 10.1111/1574-6941.12396 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Alfellani MA, Stensvold CR, Vidal-Lapiedra A, Onuoha ESU, Fagbenro-Beyioku AF, Clark CG. Variable geographic distribution of Blastocystis subtypes and its potential implications. Acta Trop. 2013. April;126(1):11–8. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2012.12.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Ramírez JD, Sánchez LV, Bautista DC, Corredor AF, Flórez AC, Stensvold CR. Blastocystis subtypes detected in humans and animals from Colombia. Infect Genet Evol. 2014. March;22:223–8. 10.1016/j.meegid.2013.07.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Casero RD, Mongi F, Sánchez A, Ramírez JD. Blastocystis and urticaria: Examination of subtypes and morphotypes in an unusual clinical manifestation. Acta Trop. 2015. August;148:156–61. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2015.05.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Tan KSW. New Insights on Classification, Identification, and Clinical Relevance of Blastocystis spp. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008. October 1;21(4):639–65. 10.1128/CMR.00022-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Mirza H, Wu Z, Kidwai F, Tan KSW. A Metronidazole-Resistant Isolate of Blastocystis spp. Is Susceptible to Nitric Oxide and Downregulates Intestinal Epithelial Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase by a Novel Parasite Survival Mechanism. Infect Immun. 2011. December 1;79(12):5019–26. 10.1128/IAI.05632-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Wu Z, Mirza H, Tan KSW. Intra-Subtype Variation in Enteroadhesion Accounts for Differences in Epithelial Barrier Disruption and Is Associated with Metronidazole Resistance in Blastocystis Subtype-7. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014. May 22;8(5):e2885 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002885 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Teo JDW, MacAry PA, Tan KSW. Pleiotropic Effects of Blastocystis spp. Subtypes 4 and 7 on Ligand-Specific Toll-Like Receptor Signaling and NF-κB Activation in a Human Monocyte Cell Line. PLoS ONE. 2014. February 14;9(2):e89036 10.1371/journal.pone.0089036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Roberts T, Ellis J, Harkness J, Marriott D, Stark D. Treatment failure in patients with chronic Blastocystis infection. J Med Microbiol. 2014. February 1;63(Pt 2):252–7. 10.1099/jmm.0.065508-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Roberts T, Stark D, Harkness J, Ellis J. Update on the pathogenic potential and treatment options for Blastocystis sp. Gut Pathog. 2014. May 28;6(1):17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Anuar TS, Ghani MKA, Azreen SN, Salleh FM, Moktar N. Blastocystis infection in Malaysia: Evidence of waterborne and human-to-human transmissions among the Proto-Malay, Negrito and Senoi tribes of Orang Asli. Parasit Vectors. 2013. February 22;6(1):40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Baldursson S, Karanis P. Waterborne transmission of protozoan parasites: Review of worldwide outbreaks–An update 2004–2010. Water Res. 2011. December 15;45(20):6603–14. 10.1016/j.watres.2011.10.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Santos HJ, Rivera WL. Comparison of direct fecal smear microscopy, culture, and polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Blastocystis sp. in human stool samples. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2013. October;6(10):780–4. 10.1016/S1995-7645(13)60138-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Stensvold C. Blastocystis: Genetic diversity and molecular methods for diagnosis and epidemiology. Trop Parasitol. 2013;3(1):26 10.4103/2229-5070.113896 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Zhang X, Zhang S, Qiao J, Wu X, Zhao L, Liu Y, et al. Ultrastructural insights into morphology and reproductive mode of Blastocystis hominis. Parasitol Res. 2012. March 1;110(3):1165–72. 10.1007/s00436-011-2607-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Rajamanikam A, Govind S. Amoebic forms of Blastocystis spp.—evidence for a pathogenic role. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6(1):295 10.1186/1756-3305-6-295 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Govind SK, Khairul AA, Smith HV. Multiple reproductive processes in Blastocystis . Trends Parasitol. 2002. December 1;18(12):528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Tan KSW, Stenzel DJ. Multiple reproductive processes in Blastocystis: proceed with caution. Trends Parasitol. 2003. July;19(7):290–1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Windsor JJ, Stenzel DJ, Macfarlane L. Multiple reproductive processes in Blastocystis hominis . Trends Parasitol. 2003. July;19(7):289–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Govind SK, Anuar KA, Smith HV. Response to Tan and Stenzel, and Windsor et al.: Blastocystis reproduction and morphology. Trends Parasitol. 2003. July 1;19(7):291–2. [Google Scholar]
- 22. Yamada M, Yoshikawa H. Morphology of Human and Animal Blastocystis Isolates with Special Reference to Reproductive Modes In: Mehlhorn H, Tan KSW, Yoshikawa H, editors. Blastocystis: Pathogen or Passenger? Springer Berlin; Heidelberg; 2012. p. 9–35. [Google Scholar]
- 23. Vdovenko AA. Blastocystis hominis: origin and significance of vacuolar and granular forms. Parasitol Res. 2000. January 1;86(1):8–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Chen XQ, Singh M, Ho LC, Tan SW, Ng GC, Moe KT, et al. Description of a Blastocystis species from Rattus norvegicus . Parasitol Res. 1997. April 1;83(4):313–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Ho LC, Singh M, Suresh G, Ng GC, Yap EH. Axenic culture of Blastocystis hominis in Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium. Parasitol Res. 1993. July 1;79(7):614–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Wong KHS, Ng GC, Lin RTP, Yoshikawa H, Taylor MB, Tan KSW. Predominance of subtype 3 among Blastocystis isolates from a major hospital in Singapore. Parasitol Res. 2007. December 7;102(4):663–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Moe KT, Singh M, Howe J, Ho LC, Tan SW, Chen XQ, et al. Experimental Blastocystis hominis infection in laboratory mice. Parasitol Res. 1997. April;83(4):319–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Noël C, Dufernez F, Gerbod D, Edgcomb VP, Delgado-Viscogliosi P, Ho L-C, et al. Molecular Phylogenies of Blastocystis Isolates from Different Hosts: Implications for Genetic Diversity, Identification of Species, and Zoonosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2005. January 1;43(1):348–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Poirier P, Meloni D, Nourrisson C, Wawrzyniak I, Viscogliosi E, Livrelli V, et al. Molecular subtyping of Blastocystis spp. using a new rDNA marker from the mitochondria-like organelle genome. Parasitology. 2014;141(05):670–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Tan TC, Suresh KG. Predominance of amoeboid forms of Blastocystis hominis in isolates from symptomatic patients. Parasitol Res. 2006. February 1;98(3):189–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. MacPherson DW, MacQueen WM. Morphological diversity of Blastocystis hominis in sodium acetate-acetic acid-formalin-preserved stool samples stained with iron hematoxylin. J Clin Microbiol. 1994. January 1;32(1):267–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Mirza H, Tan KSW. Blastocystis exhibits inter- and intra-subtype variation in cysteine protease activity. Parasitol Res. 2008. October 10;104(2):355–61. 10.1007/s00436-008-1203-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Suresh K, Howe J, Ng GC, Ho LC, Ramachandran NP, Loh AK, et al. A multiple fission-like mode of asexual reproduction in Blastocystis hominis . Parasitol Res. 1994. June 1;80(6):523–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data are from the Blastocystis ImageStream study may be assessed at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.32605.