Novel targeted bladder drug-delivery systems: a review

Abstract

The objective of pharmaceutics is the development of drugs with increased efficacy and reduced side effects. Prolonged exposure of the diseased tissue to the drug is of crucial importance. Drug-delivery systems (DDSs) have been introduced to control rate, time, and place of release. Drugs can easily reach the bladder through a catheter, while systemically administered agents may undergo extensive metabolism. Continuous urine filling and subsequent washout hinder intravesical drug delivery (IDD). Moreover, the low permeability of the urothelium, also described as the bladder permeability barrier, poses a major challenge in the development of the IDD. DDSs increase bioavailability of drugs, therefore improving therapeutic effect and patient compliance. This review focuses on novel DDSs to treat bladder conditions such as overactive bladder, interstitial cystitis, bladder cancer, and recurrent urinary tract infections. The rationale and strategies for both systemic and local delivery methods are discussed, with emphasis on new formulations of well-known drugs (oxybutynin), nanocarriers, polymeric hydrogels, intravesical devices, encapsulated DDSs, and gene therapy. We give an overview of current and future prospects of DDSs for bladder disorders, including nanotechnology and gene therapy.

Introduction

Drug targeting is the ability of a drug to accumulate in a specific organ or tissue selectively and quantitatively, independently of the site and methods of its administration.1 This concept has been suggested by Paul Ehrlich a century ago. He spread the idea of the “magic bullet” for the synthesis of antibacterials. This was represented by the arsphenamine, the first truly effective drug against syphilis, and marketed under the name Salvarsan (“the arsenic that saves”) at the beginning of the 1910s. Targeted treatment has obvious advantages. Pharmaceutical therapies are often dosed systemically, while their targets may be a specific tissue or a single compartment of the body. Therefore, the drug is distributed within the body and also has to cross biological barriers. Large quantities of drugs have to be administered to achieve a therapeutic concentration in a certain body compartment, also increasing the chances of negative side effects. It is understandable as to how research on drug targeting is under constant development and different delivery systems have been devised. The rationale is to improve efficacy by increasing the concentration at a target site while simultaneously minimizing toxicity by reducing off-target accumulation.2

An economic issue should also be addressed. In fact, the introduction of a new drug molecule in the market is expensive and time consuming, as it involves discovery, clinical testing, development, and regulatory approval. Improving safety/efficacy ratio of marketed drugs is more cost-effective. This can be obtained by controlling the rate, time, and place of release of drugs in the body through a drug-delivery system (DDS). Hence, DDS is an interface between the patient and the drug. It may be a formulation of the drug to administer it for a therapeutic purpose or a device used to deliver the drug.3

Selective pharmacologic targeting to individual compartments of the body is challenging. A therapeutic agent may be known, but its clinical application could be hindered by difficulties in achieving targeted delivery. Certain physiologic compartments such as the bladder, brain, and eye are viewed as “privileged” and may require specific techniques or devices to physically target drugs at the site of disease.4

Traditionally, many genitourinary conditions have been treated with medications administered orally. To increase efficacy and patient compliance, alternative delivery systems have been devised. The bladder is easily accessible using a catheter or cystoscope through the urethra by a simple procedure that can be performed by health care practitioners or even by patients themselves (clean intermittent self-catheterization).

This review focuses on novel DDS for bladder disorders such as overactive bladder (OAB), interstitial cystitis (IC), bladder cancer (BC), and recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs).

Functional anatomy of urinary bladder

The bladder is a hollow elastic organ that accommodates and stores urine, and facilitates voiding at appropriate intervals. Its size varies during filling, and normal capacity is ~500 mL. Inner aspect of the bladder is lined by the urothelium, which is crucial in order to design effective intravesical drug delivery (IDD). It is a stratified epithelium, also known as transitional epithelium, with a layer of unique “umbrella cells” forming the luminal surface.5 These cells can flatten and increase surface area with stretching.6 Umbrella cells are covered by rigid plaques, composed of four major uroplakins, UPIa (27 kDa), UPIb (28 kDa), UPII (15 kDa), and UPIII (47 kDa).7 The impermeability of the urothelium is further augmented by glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), which form a mucin hydrophilic layer adherent to the luminal side.8 These GAGs form a very tight barrier, capable of facing potentially noxious levels of urea, ammonia, and other toxic metabolites for prolonged periods of time. The function of this barrier is similar to the blood–brain barrier, with the only difference that the bladder is a storage organ, and needs to be more resistant to the passage of molecules. This is also known as the bladder permeability barrier (BPB) and represents an important obstacle in the success of IDD (Figure 1).9

Figure 1.

Structure of the urinary bladder wall and urothelium.

Abbreviation: GAG, glycosaminoglycan.

DDSs in bladder disease

Novel DDSs have been devised to treat major bladder disorders. These are briefly summarized in the following paragraphs.

Overactive bladder

OAB is a symptom syndrome which is defined by the presence of urgency, with or without urgency incontinence, usually accompanied by frequency and nocturia in the absence of infection or other obvious pathology.10 Antimuscarinics are the mainstay of current medical management, but the onset of side effect may lead the patient to discontinue the treatment.11 Research and development of novel therapeutic options is an active field in order to reduce the prevalence of refractory OAB.12,13

Interstitial cystitis

IC, or painful bladder syndrome, is a chronic condition seen mainly in women (10:1 female:male ratio). Main presenting symptoms are frequency, urgency, nocturia, and bladder pain, which often increases as the bladder fills and reduces after micturition.14 The pathophysiology is poorly understood and considered multifactorial. Currently, the most acceptable theory is injury or dysfunction of the GAG layer.15 Current treatment involves dietary manipulation, pain management, bladder retraining, and medication. There are several oral or intravesical options with variable efficacy, and to date, there is no consensus regarding which treatment is best. Potentially, IDD could better restore the integrity of the urothelial membrane.16

Bladder cancer

BC is caused by the uncontrolled growth of cells that line the bladder wall. It is the seventh most common cancer in the UK and the ninth worldwide.17,18 Main risk factors are increasing age, smoking, and exposure to urothelial carcinogens.19,20 Transitional cell carcinomas account for >90% of tumors, while squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma represent ~5% and 1%, respectively. Symptoms may include hematuria, frequency, urgency, and dysuria. Seventy-five percent to 80% of BCs present as non-muscle-invasive disease, which can be managed with intravesical therapy. In these cases, either a chemotherapeutic drug or immunotherapy with Bacillus Calmette–Guérin may be given transurethrally. Novel DDSs could increase the stay of the drug in the bladder and potentially improve efficacy and therefore survival rate of the disease.

Recurrent urinary tract infections

UTI is one of the most common infectious diseases worldwide. Ten percent to 15% of all women will experience recurrent UTIs.21 These are defined as three or more episodes of UTI during a 12-month period or two infections in a 6-month period.22

Escherichia coli, the species most commonly involved in UTIs, can invade the urothelium and establish reservoirs in the cytoplasm of apical cells.23 Systemic antibiotics may not achieve effective doses in the bladder and also fail to penetrate the urothelium to eradicate intracellular reservoirs. Moreover, in the long-term, they can lead to antimicrobial resistances, side effects, and low patient compliance. Novel DDSs could allow higher concentrations of antibiotics in the bladder in order to pass through the urothelial cell membranes.

Targeted bladder DDSs

A DDS is a formulation or a device that enables the introduction of a therapeutic substance in the body and improves its efficacy and safety by controlling the rate, time, and place of release of drugs in the body. It involves the administration of the therapeutic product, the release of the active ingredients by the product, and the subsequent transport of the active ingredients across the biological membranes to the site of action. A significant amount of work in drug delivery targeted to the bladder has focused on the disorders mentioned above. Drugs may be either administered directly to the bladder, or given systemically and targeted to the bladder. Most of the drugs available for treatment of bladder diseases are administered orally. The reasons for this preference are the ease of administration and widespread acceptance by patients. The challenge consists in delivering an effective dose in the bladder minimizing undesired biodistribution which could increase side effects. Different strategies have been developed to find drugs with better efficacy and tolerability, leading to novel therapeutic options. The bladder can be easily accessed using a catheter or cystoscope through the urethra. Hence, it is an attractive local drug-delivery target.

Systemic delivery methods

A classification of various methods of systemic drug delivery by anatomical routes is shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

A classification of various anatomical routes for systemic drug delivery

Gastrointestinal system

Oral

Rectal

Parenteral

Subcutaneous injection

Intramuscular injection

Intravenous injection

Intra-arterial injection

Transmucosal

Transnasal

Pulmonary

Transdermal

Intra-osseous infusion

New formulations of well-known drugs are in constant development in order to minimize side effects and improve tolerability. For example, oxybutynin is the most widely prescribed antimuscarinic for OAB.24 Oxybutynin is a tertiary amine, and when administered orally, undergoes extensive upper gastrointestinal and first-pass hepatic metabolism via the cytochrome P450 system. Its primary metabolite is N-desethyloxybutynin (N-DEO) and is the major contributor to the occurrence of dry mouth.25 Extended-release formulations when compared to immediate-release cause less reduction in saliva production, a typical side effect of antimuscarinics.26

Transdermal route

As an alternative to oral route, transdermal drug delivery of oxybutynin has been introduced, and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved it in 2003. Not surprisingly, reducing first-pass metabolism, the transdermal route has shown better tolerability.27,28 Transdermal patches were the first to be marketed, followed by transdermal gel, with the aim of reducing application site reactions as erythema and pruritus.29 Penetration enhancers have also been used to facilitate transdermal drug transport. Recently, Goldfischer et al published the results of a Phase III trial that looked at the efficacy and safety of oxybutynin transdermal gel 3% (OTG3%) formulated with propylene glycol as permeation enhancer. OTG3% 84 mg and OTG3% 56 mg were compared with placebo gel in adults with urgency and/or mixed urinary incontinence (UI). In December 2011, the FDA approved the availability of OTG3% (84 mg/d) in a titratable pump dispenser, while the lower dose (56 mg/d) was not approved. Six hundred and twenty-six patients were randomized 1:1:1 in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. The primary efficacy end point was change from baseline to week 12 in weekly UI episodes recorded in 3-day bladder diaries. Secondary end points were change from baseline to week 12 in daily urinary frequency and change from baseline to week 12 in average urinary void volume. OTG3% 84 mg/d achieved significantly greater improvement vs placebo in weekly UI episodes (mean change from baseline: −20.4 vs −18.1, P<0.05), daily urinary frequency (−2.6 vs −1.9, P=0.001), and urinary void volume (32.7 vs 9.8, P<0.0001). Dry mouth and application site erythema were more common with OTG3% 84 mg/d than with placebo (12.1% vs 5.0%, P=0.028, and 3.7% vs 1.0%, P=NS, respectively). Changes from baseline to week 12 of OTG3% 56 mg/d vs placebo were not significant for primary and secondary outcomes.30

Vaginal route

The vaginal route represents an alternative for women who are unable to tolerate adverse effects of oral antimuscarinics or application site reactions associated with topical/transder-mal products. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd introduced a flexible transvaginal ring that is designed to continuously release oxybutynin (DR-3001). In view of the promising results of a Phase II trial,31 DR-3001 underwent a Phase III evaluation. One thousand one hundred and two women with pure-predominantly urge UI were randomized to DR-3001 4 mg/d, DR-3001 6 mg/d, or placebo vaginal ring, inserted vaginally and replaced every 4 weeks. In this multicenter, 12-week trial, the primary end point was the change in total weekly number of UI episodes. Secondary outcomes were change in average daily urinary frequency, void volume, and proportion of subjects with no UI episodes. These were recorded in a final 3-day diary. DR-3001 4 mg/d and 6 mg/d showed significantly greater improvement vs placebo in weekly UI episodes (mean change from baseline: −20.5 and −21.4 vs −18.1, P=0.0013 and P<0.0001, respectively) and daily urinary frequency (mean change from baseline: −2.0 and −3.2 vs −2.0, P=0.0005 and P<0.0001, respectively). No significant differences were noted between DR-3001 4 mg/d and 6 mg/d vs placebo in terms of urinary void volume (mean change from baseline: 25.4 and 23.6 vs 18.8, P=NS). DR-3001 4 mg/d and 6 mg/d also had a greater proportion of women with no UI episodes recorded in the final 3-day diary (36% and 35% vs 28%, P=0.029 and P=0.074, respectively). Except for a higher incidence of dry mouth, DR-3001 was well tolerated and had a safety profile similar to that of the placebo ring. In fact, dry mouth occurred in 6% of cases with DR-3001 4 mg/d, 8% with DR-3001 6 mg/d, and 4% with placebo; constipation occurred in 1%, 1%, and 2% of cases with DR-3001 4 mg/d, DR-3001 6 mg/d, and placebo, respectively; culture-positive UTIs occurred in 8%, 10%, and 8% of cases with DR-3001 4 mg/d, DR-3001 6 mg/d, and placebo, respectively.32

Local delivery methods

Bladder anatomy allows relatively easy and direct delivery of drugs through a catheter, allowing the drug to reach the target site with minimal side effects while avoiding first-pass metabolism. Intravesical administration of oxybutynin compared to oral showed higher bioavailability, with reduced concentration of its active metabolite N-DEO.33

Dysfunction of the GAG layer is the most currently accepted theory for IC. Hence, the use of IDD might be rational because oral therapy requires large doses and only a small portion is actually absorbed and reaches the bladder.34,35

The intravesical administration of hyaluronic acid (HA) has been shown to be effective in the IC, as it replaces GAG layer.36 Moreover, it inhibits leukocyte aggregation and migration, and adherence of immune complexes to polymorphonuclear cells.37 Recent studies demonstrated how HA significantly suppresses the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 and also increases the levels of sulfated GAGs.38

However, DDSs are also associated with some difficulties. Firstly, drug dilution occurs as the urine is continuously produced and due to subsequent washout during urine voiding. Secondly, the urothelium forms a low permeability barrier, allowing poor penetration of drugs into the bladder wall. Thirdly, repetitive catheterization may reduce patient compliance. To overcome this matter, different strategies have been employed. Drugs may be injected into the bladder wall. For example, in cases of OAB refractory to antimuscarinics, intradetrusorial injection of onabotulinumtoxin A (Botox^®; Allergan Inc., Irvine, CA, USA) is currently routine practice in most of the units dealing with lower urinary tract dysfunctions.39 Other approaches to increase drug permeability are physical methods and chemical permeation enhancers (Table 2).

Table 2.

Strategies for improving drug permeability

Physical approaches

Electromotive drug administration

Hyperthermia (intravesical mitomycin C instillation)40

Chemical approaches

Dimethyl sulfoxide

Protamine sulfate

Biomolecules (chitosan, polycarbophil)

Novel targeted DDSs have recently been developed to prolong the effect of drugs in the bladder. This has been possible with the introduction of nanotechnology in the field of drug delivery. This science refers to structures that have one or more dimensions in the nanometer scale.41 Substances are loaded within nanoparticles.42 This holds a high potential of improving the therapeutic value of different drugs by increasing bioavailability, solubility, and retention time.43

Nanocarriers

Nanocarriers can deliver drugs to site-specific targets. They can be formulated from materials such as lipids, polymers, proteins, and metals.44

Liposomes are phospholipid concentric bilayer nanospheres mimicking human cell walls. They allow the delivery of both lipophilic drugs such as capsaicin and hydrophilic drugs such as botulinum toxin. Clathrin-mediated endocytosis is their route of entry into the urothelium.45

Intravesical administration of liposomes alone can enhance resistance to irritant penetration as shown in a rat model with hyperactive bladder.46 Further studies showed that intravesical liposomes are safe and have similar efficacy to one of the most effective FDA-approved pharmacological treatments for IC as oral pentosan polysulfate (PP) (Elmiron^®). Empty liposomes have been shown to be effective as potential treatment of IC.47 This is thought to be related to their ability to form a protective lipid film on the urothelial surface. In a pilot study, intravesical instillation of PP encapsulated in liposomes was effective in refractory IC patients.48 However, studies with bigger number and placebo groups are warranted.

Liposomal vesicles enhance the therapeutic index of chemotherapeutic agents and represent a promising approach for cancer treatment.49 Currently, a Phase II trial is evaluating temperature-sensitive liposomes plus local hyperthermia in patients with recurrent chest wall breast cancer.50 Encouraging results could lead to explore this approach in different clinical setting, including BC.

Other nanocarriers that can be used for IDD are solid lipid nanoparticles, protein nanoparticles with targeted ligands grafted on the surface, branched polymeric den-drimers, mucoadhesive biopolymers (chitosan) or synthetic polymers, magnetic particles, gold nanoshells, and in situ gelling systems.51

Polymeric hydrogels

A novel approach is the use of hydrogels as depot formulations on the bladder walls. This enables longer exposure of the urinary tract tissue to existing drugs, as compared to standard intravesical instillation, as they remain attached to the bladder wall even after urine voiding.52 Between the different types that have been developed, thermosensitive hydrogels have gained increasing attention.53 These are aqueous solutions of poly (ethylene glycol-b-[dl-lactic acid-co-glycolic acid]-b-ethyleneglycol) triblock copolymers that form a free-flowing solution at room temperature and become a viscous gel at body temperature of 37°C.54

There are several potential polymeric gel systems that have been explored. TCGel^® is a novel hydrogel with reverse thermal gelation properties produced by TheraCoat Ltd (Raanana, Israel). This means that it is fluid when cold and a gel at body temperature. Following instillation, the gel solidifies and acts as sustained drug release depot in situ. When the gel is in contact with urine, it dissolves and gradually releases the drug over a period of 6–8 hours. TCGel^® is slowly excreted from the bladder during urination. It is 100% biocompatible and harmless to the body. TheraCoat Ltd has commenced several efficacy clinical trials.

A Phase I/II clinical trial was completed in Israel exploring the feasibility, tolerability, and safety of 200 units of onabotulinumtoxin A (Botox^®) premixed with chilled 40 mL of TCGel^®. Fifteen patients with IC were enrolled in the trial and received a single instillation. Follow-up was at weeks 2, 6, and 12 post-instillation. The efficacy outcome measures included IC Symptom Index (ICSI) and IC Problem Index (ICPI). A reduction in the ICSI and ICPI was observed since week 2 and was also apparent at week 12. Likewise, a reduction from baseline was observed in the daytime urinary frequency and urge episodes, while the nocturnal frequency remained unchanged. No serious drug-related adverse events were reported.55

TheraCoat Ltd also completed the Intravesical Botulinum Toxin Treatment for OAB (INTIMO) study, a double-blind placebo-controlled study aiming to evaluate the efficacy of bladder instillation with botulinum toxin and TCGel^® in patients with OAB, but the results are not as yet available.56

Other ongoing clinical trials are currently looking at the intravesical instillation of mitomycin C (MMC) mixed with TCGel^® in patients with non-muscle-invasive BC (Optimized Instillation of Mitomycin for bladder cancer treatment [OPTIMA] study).57 Preclinical results demonstrated the following:

• – levels of MMC in the bladder 2 hours and 6 hours following instillation were over tenfold higher as compared to drug alone (same total dosage);

• – levels of MMC in the urine were higher for a longer period of time compared to drug alone;

• – levels of MMC in the plasma were low, confirming safety of the treatment.

For intravesical chemotherapy, hydrophobic anticancer drugs offer a distinct advantage of greater permeability through the urothelium as compared to hydrophilic drugs. This allows longer retention of therapeutic doses within the bladder tissue even after the instilled solution is washed out after voiding. Loading hydrophobic drugs into carriers for sustained IDD is viewed as one of the most promising strategies to ensure continuous presence of drug in the bladder with fewer or no intermittent catheterization. Mucoadhesive nanogels have been recently evaluated in porcine urinary bladder and could be a promising candidate for intravesical delivery of hydrophobic drugs in BC therapy.58

Intravesical devices

Intravesical instillation therapy has a number of potential benefits including high drug concentration at the bladder and reduced systemic exposure which minimizes systemic toxicity and side effects compared to oral medications. However, repeated instillations are often required to extend the drug exposure, and this lowers the compliance. Indwelling intravesical devices are physical devices that can be inserted and remain in the bladder. The drug is then released from the device in a controlled and extended manner. The device can be either biodegradable or nondegradable. The former eliminates the device removal step but can provoke debris that might lead to voiding difficulties.

A reservoir-based device constructed of a completely biodegradable elastomer supplying ciprofloxacin-HCl has been evaluated in vitro and showed functionality and stability.59 Biodegradable devices have also been studied for IDD of antimuscarinics as this could represent an alternative to oral treatment for OAB. In vitro studies in a porcine bladder model showed effectiveness of trospium chloride (TrCl) when loaded onto degradable poly(lactide-co-glycolide)-based polymer carriers.60 Lipid-based intravesical DDSs were loaded with TrCl and showed a drug release ranging from several days up to weeks.61

Trials with nondegradable indwelling devices first evaluated an intravesical pump called UROS, developed by Situs Corporation Ltd (Houston TX, USA). The device was tested in Phase I/II trials.62 However, no more recent trials have been published.

A nonbiodegradable device, Lidocaine Releasing Intravesical System (LiRIS^®; TARIS Biomedical, Lexington, MA, USA), has been deemed for intravesical delivery of lidocaine. It has a double design: one tube contains solid lidocaine hydrochloride minitablets, enabling a higher dose of drug than if a solution was used, and the other lumen contains nickel titanium wire, which adopts a “pretzel” conformation once inside the bladder, preventing it from being accidentally voided. It is retained in the bladder with minimal discomfort, allowing release of lidocaine for a sustained period. A silicone container absorbs urine to dissolve the lidocaine contents, whereas the osmotic pressure created forces the solution out of the container through a small orifice in a controlled release over 14 days. Promising results were achieved when the device was tried in a rabbit model. In fact, lidocaine concentration in the bladder tissue was >0.1 μg/g during the 3-day period of device release, while a single instillation yielded immeasurable amounts within 24 hours.63

TARIS Biomedical carried out a Phase I safety assessment study in healthy volunteers. An empty device was inserted into the bladder of seven women, while three women underwent cystoscopy without placement of the device. Tolerability was assessed using visual analog scales for bladder sensation and voiding behavior, which revealed that changes from baseline were similar between groups. A Phase Ib cohort study in 16 women with moderate-to-severe IC followed. Subjects received either LiRIS^® 200 mg or LiRIS^® 650 mg for 2 weeks. There was a significant improvement in bladder pain, urinary urgency, and voiding frequency. Cystoscopic findings also improved on day 14 (day of removal) compared with day 1. Most strikingly, of the six patients who were noted to have Hunner’s lesion on cystoscopic insertion, five demonstrated complete resolution 14 days later. Global response assessment showed an overall responder rate of 64% at day 14 and a sustained overall responder rate of 64% 2 weeks later. Extended follow-up suggests that the reduction in pain was maintained for several months after the device was removed. Expanded Phase II/III trials are now underway. Potentially, other therapeutic agents could be delivered by the device for the treatment of other bladder disorders.64

Allergan Inc. is sponsoring two Phase II clinical trials that aim to establish the safety and efficacy of LiRIS^® in IC patients with65 and without66 Hunner’s lesions.

Encapsulated DDS

There are pilot data showing the feasibility of loading an antibiotic into a non-cell-toxic microcapsule that can both penetrate bladder cells and provide slow release of the drug that retains its bactericidal properties.67 This system has been developed for the delivery of high doses of antibiotic to treat recalcitrant UTIs. The capsules have been prepared with coaxial electrohydrodynamic forming technology, which has shown considerable promise for the production of fibers and particles at the micro- and nanoscale.68 Polymethylsilsesquioxane has showed good biocompatibility and physiological inertness and has been inserted in the capsules together with gentamicin.69 In an in vitro assay, the capsules were able to kill Enterococcus faecalis, the most common uropathogen. Moreover, the capsules were incubated with bladder epithelial cells collected from the urine of patients with UTIs. Successful delivery in bladder cells was demonstrated, but the mechanism is still unknown. High localized doses of antibiotic could be reached by introducing the capsules directly into the bladder via a catheter.

Gene therapy

Gene therapy is a promising therapy for controlling BC as it is highly selective for tumor cells with mutated genes. Moreover, it carries the potential of restoring normal cell growth by correcting genetic defects. Gene delivery systems include both viral (adenovirus) and nonviral vectors (lipoplexes).

In viral vectors, the genome contains the therapeutic gene that is carried into the mutated cells. Viral receptor expression and urothelium represent barriers that research is trying to overcome. Viral vectors are associated with permeation enhancers to improve the delivery of intravesical gene therapy. Modulation of coxsackie-adenovirus receptor expression70 and coadministration of polyamide Syn 3 are active research fields.71 Although the use of Syn 3 appears to be nontoxic to the bladder tissue, other transduction-enhancing agents may produce adverse effects on the urothelium.72,73

Nonviral vectors consist of genes incorporated into liposomes, such as IL-12 gene, to induce immune response. The interest toward these vectors has increased due to the potential of toxicity from systemic absorption of viral vectors from the bladder.74

Small “interfering” RNAs delivered into the bladder using liposomes have been effective in vivo and may represent a novel therapeutic tool.75 Gene therapy has also been developed to treat OAB and IC in rat models and may represent a future treatment modality.76 From epidemiologic studies, there is increasing evidence that bladder disorders as UI and OAB are heritable conditions. Underlying genetic variants have been identified and could potentially represent future drug targets.77

Conclusion

The goal of targeted delivery drugs is to transport proper amounts of drugs to the desirable sites while minimizing unwanted side effects on other tissues. Several strategies have been developed within the last decade. Various drug formulations, routes of drug administration, as well as devices for drug delivery and targets have been described. The bladder is an ideal target for local drug delivery as it is easily accessed through the urethra. IDD is however hindered by continuous filling of the bladder with urine, the low permeability of the BPB, and the washout during voiding. Hence, serial drug instillations are often required.

In the last decade, novel DDSs have been devised with the aim to improve the therapeutic effect and reduce costs linked to the discovery of new drugs. Nanotechnology has revolutionized the field of drug delivery and represents a great potential for the future. This will require interdisciplinary teams including clinicians, biologists, engineers, and pharmaceutical scientists. Gene therapy also has advantages as it is highly specific for tumor cells. Overall, further clinical trials are required to move this therapeutic option into the clinical setting.