Skip to main content
Genomics Data logoLink to Genomics Data
. 2015 Aug 5;6:44–45. doi: 10.1016/j.gdata.2015.08.002

Expression data of HeLa cells treated with CENP-E siRNA or Eg5 siRNA in the presence of BubR1 siRNA

Yusuke Nakayama a, Akihiro Ohashi b,
PMCID: PMC4664670  PMID: 26697328

Abstract

The molecular mechanism responsible for cell fate after mitotic slippage is unclear. We investigated the postmitotic effects of different mitotic aberrations (Ohashi et al. [1]), misaligned chromosomes produced by CENP-E siRNA (siCENP-E), and monopolar spindles resulting from Eg5 siRNA (siEg5) (Miki et al. [2]). To determine which signaling pathways contribute to the postmitotic effect of siCENP-E in the presence of siBubR1 (siCENP-E + siBubR1) compared with siEg5 + siBubR1, we performed comprehensive gene expression analysis using microarray comparisons [1]. The microarray data have been deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE67905.

Keywords: CENP-E, Eg5, BubR1, HeLa, GeneChip microarray analysis


Specifications
Organism/cell line/tissue Homo sapiens/HeLa/cervical cancer
Sex Female
Sequencer or array type Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array (Affymetrix Inc., CA, USA)
Data format Raw: CEL files, normalized data: SOFT, MINIML and TXT
Experimental factors siBubR1 + siCENP-E-treated cells vs. siBubR1 + siEg5-treated cells vs. siBubR1-treated cells. siNS-treated cells were used as a negative control.
Experimental features A comprehensive gene expression analysis by microarray comparisons was performed comparing siBubR1 + siCENP-E-treated, siBubR1 + siEg5-treated, and siBubR1-treated cells.
Consent Not necessary, HeLa cells were obtained from ATCC.
Sample source location Fujisawa, Kanagawa, Japan

1. Direct link to deposited data

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE67905

2. Experimental design, materials and methods

2.1. Cell cultures

HeLa cells, purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA, USA), were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% FBS.

2.2. Transfection of siRNA oligonucleotides

We investigated the postmitotic effects of different mitotic aberrations [1], misaligned chrmosoms by siCENP-E and monopolar spindles by siEg5 [2].

siRNA oligonucleotides targeting CENP-E (M-003252-02), Eg5 (M-003317-01), and BubR1 (M-004101-02) were obtained from Dharmacon (SMART pools, Dharmacon, Lafayette, CO, USA). The siTrio negative control (B-Bridge International, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA) was used as a non-silencing (NS) siRNA (siNS). Twenty-five nanomoles of pooled siRNA per gene were used for double knockdown (total siRNA concentration, 50 nM). siRNA transfection was performed as described previously [3]. Transfection of siRNA oligonucleotides was performed with Dharmafect (Dharmacon) in 6-well plates according to the manufacturer's specifications. Seventy-two hours after transfection, the cells were collected for RNA preparation for GeneChip microarray analysis.

2.3. GeneChip microarray analysis

To determine which signaling pathways contribute to the postmitotic effect of siCENP-E + siBubR1 compared with siEg5 + siBubR1, we performed comprehensive gene expression analysis using microarray comprisons (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Schematic presentation of microarray comparisons in this study.

Total RNAs were extracted using the RNeasy Miniprep kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Preparation of cDNAs and cRNAs, hybridization, and microarray scanning were performed according to the manufacturer's protocols (Affymetrix Inc., CA, USA). Biotinylated cRNAs were hybridized to Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array. Microarray Analysis Suite 5.0 (MAS5; Affymetrix) was used to quantify microarray signals, and the intensities were normalized to the median expression level by setting the median intensity to 1.0 using the GeneSpring software package (Agilent Technology, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Differentially expressed genes were identified with a fold change of > 2.0. Probe sets with absent call in all samples for comparison were filtered out. In addition, intensity filtering was applied, with the criterion set to 0.5. The microarray data have been deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE67905.

3. Discussion

In this study, we acquired microarray gene expression profiles for siBubR1 + siCENP-E-treated, siBubR1 + siEg5-treated, and siBubR1 -treated cells. These expression data would be valuable for understanding the postmitotic effects of aneuploidy as well as polyploidy.

Conflict of interest

Yusuke Nakayama and Akihiro Ohashi are employees of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd.

References

  • 1.Ohashi A., Ohori M., Iwai K., Nakayama Y., Nambu T. Aneuploidy generates proteotoxic stress and DNA damage concurrently with p53-mediated post-mitotic apoptosis in SAC-impaired cells. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:7668. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Miki H., Okada Y., Hirokawa N. Analysis of the kinesin superfamily: insights into structure and function. Trends Cell Biol. 2005;15:467–476. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2005.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ohashi A., Zdzienicka M.Z., Chen J., Couch F.J. Fanconi anemia complementation group D2 (FANCD2) functions independently of BRCA2- and RAD51-associated homologous recombination in response to DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:14877–14883. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M414669200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genomics Data are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES