Skip to main content
Genomics Data logoLink to Genomics Data
. 2015 Sep 22;6:191–192. doi: 10.1016/j.gdata.2015.09.009

Draft genome sequences of seven isolates of Phytophthora ramorum EU2 from Northern Ireland

Lourdes de la Mata Saez a, Alistair R McCracken a,b, Louise R Cooke a,b, Paul O'Neill c, Murray Grant c, David J Studholme c,
PMCID: PMC4664740  PMID: 26697370

Abstract

Here we present draft-quality genome sequence assemblies for the oomycete Phytophthora ramorum genetic lineage EU2. We sequenced genomes of seven isolates collected in Northern Ireland between 2010 and 2012. Multiple genome sequences from P. ramorum EU2 will be valuable for identifying genetic variation within the clonal lineage that can be useful for tracking its spread.

Keywords: Oomycetes, Phytophthora, Sudden larch death, Phytopathogen


Specifications
Organism/cell line/tissue Phytophthora ramorum
Sex Not applicable
Sequencer or array type Illumina HiSeq
Data format Analysed; i.e. raw data was filtered and then assembled.
Experimental factors Genomic sequence of pure microbial cultures
Experimental features Genomic sequence of pure microbial cultures
Consent Not applicable. Data are available without restriction.
Sample source location Northern Ireland, United Kingdom

1. Direct links to deposited data

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/292010.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/292002.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/291998.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/291995.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/291992.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/291990.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/291989.

2. Experimental design, materials and methods

Members of the genus Phytophthora, like other oomycetes, superficially resemble fungi but are completely distinct from true fungi both phylogenetically [1] and in their phenotypic characteristics; for example, unlike true fungi, the oomycetes are usually diploid [2]. The genus includes numerous important pathogens of plants, including trees and food crops [3]. The species Phytophthora ramorum [4] is an invasive and aggressive pathogen that is believed to have been introduced into North America and Europe [5] from an unknown and possibly Asian centre of origin [6]. Two distinct clonal lineages in North America and a third lineage in Europe appear to have been genetically isolated from each other for tens of millennia [7]. Since 1995 the NA1 lineage and, later, the NA2 lineage have been responsible for the deaths of millions of trees in North America as a result of Sudden Oak Death [8]. The EU1 lineage was originally discovered in Europe on Rhododendron and Viburnum species in nurseries and gardens [4] and has also crossed the Atlantic to North America [9]. Until recently, P. ramorum in Europe was mostly confined to ornamentals in nurseries and gardens but since 2009, P. ramorum has been causing landscape-scale epidemics on Japanese larch (Larix kaempferi) plantations in the UK [10]. In 2012, the discovery of a fourth clonal lineage of P. ramorum was reported; this is currently known to occur only in Northern Ireland and western Scotland [11] and designated as EU2.

We used the Illumina HiSeq to generate 100-bp paired sequence reads from genomic DNA prepared from seven isolates of EU2 collected from multiple sites in Northern Ireland between 2010 and 2012 (Table 1). We filtered and trimmed the reads using TrimGalore (with a threshold score of 30) and performed de novo assembly of the trimmed reads using SPAdes 3.5.0 with default parameter values. Finally, we generated scaffolds and performed gap-filling with SSPACE 3.0 [12]. The following options and parameter values were used in SSPACE: -x 1 -m 50 -o 10 -z 200 -p 1.

Table 1.

Sequenced isolates.

Isolate Host Date of isolation
SOD 158/11 Larch 2011
SOD 58/12 Noble-fir 2012
SOD 69/12 Larch 2012
SOD 22/12 Rhododendron species 2012
SOD 136/11 Larch 2011
SOD 169/11 Rhododendron species 2011
SOD L51 Rhododendron species 2010

We estimated the completeness of our assemblies with the CEGMA pipeline [13]. Briefly, CEGMA checks for the presence of each of 248 genes that are ultra-conserved across a range of eukaryotic genomes. It reports how many of these genes are present in the assembled sequence, either as complete genes or partial genes. Based on CEGMA output, it appears that our genome assemblies are slightly more complete than the previously published P. ramorum Pr102 genome sequence [14]. However, the total lengths of our assemblies are only about 77% of the length of the published Pr102 genome assembly (Table 2). This likely reflects the limitations of our simple approach involving sequencing of a single short-insert with a short-read sequencing platform in contrast with the Pr102 genome project, which used Sanger chemistry. In both the present study and the Pr102 project, a whole-genome shotgun approach was used.

Table 2.

Assembly statistics for the genome sequences reported in this study compared with those for the previously sequenced P. ramorum Pr102 [14].

Genome Accession numbers Contig assembly size (bp) Number of contigs Contig N50 (bp) CEGMA coverage: % complete (% partial)
SOD 158/11 LHTR01000000 41,321,513 5100 23,395 93.95 (97.18)
SOD 58/12 LHTS01000000 41,965,240 4817 27,285 93.55 (97.18)
SOD 69/12 LHTT01000000 41,749,343 4661 27,831 93.95 (97.58)
SOD 22/12 LHTU01000000 41,724,146 4906 26,514 93.55 (97.18)
SOD 136/11 LHTV01000000 41,815,862 4600 27,950 93.55 (96.77)
SOD 169/11 LHTW01000000 41,958,963 4719 27,788 93.95 (97.58)
SOD L51 LHTX01000000 41,834,411 4806 25,735 94.35 (97.58)
Pr102 AAQX01000000 54,424,978 7589 47,511 92.34 (95.16)

Genome sequences have been invaluable in the study of Phytophthora plant pathogens [15]. Until now, genome sequence data have only been published for the EU1 lineage of P. ramorum [14]. Availability of genome sequence data from the EU2 lineage will be a useful resource for investigating the relationships among the four lineages as well as for developing assays for detection and monitoring. Multiple genome sequences from P. ramorum EU2 will be valuable for identifying genetic variation within the clonal lineage that can be useful for tracking its spread [16], [17]; no microsatellite sequence variation was known among the originally described isolates of EU2 [11], but the availability of genomic sequence data will facilitate the development of molecular markers based on microsatellites and/or single-nucleotide variants.

Acknowledgements

Work in the laboratory of DJS is supported by the BBSRC (BB/L012499/1 and Nornex). Sequencing was performed by the Exeter Sequencing Service at the University of Exeter, which is supported by Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund (WT097835MF), Wellcome Trust Multi-User Equipment Award (WT101650MA) and BBSRC LOLA award (BB/K003240/1). LdlMS was supported by COFORD (Council for Forest Research and Development) Ireland, Project reference: 10/721.

References

  • 1.Beakes G.W., Glockling S.L., Sekimoto S. The evolutionary phylogeny of the oomycete “fungi”. Protoplasma. 2012;249:3–19. doi: 10.1007/s00709-011-0269-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rossman A.Y., Palm M.E. Why are Phytophthora and other oomycota not true fungi? Outlooks Pest Manag. 2006;17:217–219. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kroon L.P.N.M., Brouwer H., de Cock A.W.A.M., Govers F., De C.A.W.A.M. The genus Phytophthora anno 2012. Phytopathology. 2012;102:348–364. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-01-11-0025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Werres S., Marwitz R. Phytophthora ramorum sp. nov., a new pathogen on Rhododendron and Viburnum. Mycol. Res. 2001 [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Grünwald N.J., Garbelotto M., Goss E.M., Heungens K., Prospero S. Emergence of the sudden oak death pathogen Phytophthora ramorum. Trends Microbiol. 2012;20:131–138. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2011.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ivors K.L., Hayden K.J., Bonants P.J.M., Rizzo D.M., Garbelotto M. AFLP and phylogenetic analyses of North American and European populations of Phytophthora ramorum. Mycol. Res. 2004;108:378–392. doi: 10.1017/s0953756204009827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Goss E.M., Carbone I., Grünwald N.J. Ancient isolation and independent evolution of the three clonal lineages of the exotic sudden oak death pathogen Phytophthora ramorum. Mol. Ecol. 2009;18:1161–1174. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04089.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Davidson J., Werres S., Garbelotto M., Hansen… E. 2003. Sudden Oak Death and Associated Diseases Caused by Phytophthora ramorum. (ddr.nal. usda.gov) [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Goss E.M., Larsen M., Vercauteren A., Werres S., Heungens K., Grünwald N.J. Phytophthora ramorum in Canada: evidence for migration within North America and from Europe. Phytopathology. 2011;101:166–171. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-05-10-0133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Brasier C., Webber J. Sudden larch death. Nature. 2010;466:824–825. doi: 10.1038/466824a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Van P.K., Franceschini S. Discovery of a fourth evolutionary lineage of Phytophthora ramorum: EU2. Fungal Biol. 2012;116:1178–1191. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2012.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Boetzer M., Henkel C.V., Jansen H.J., Butler D., Pirovano W. Scaffolding pre-assembled contigs using SSPACE. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:578–579. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Parra G., Bradnam K., Ning Z., Keane T., Korf I. Assessing the gene space in draft genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:289–297. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tyler B.M., Tripathy S., Zhang X., Dehal P., Jiang R.H.Y., Aerts A., Arredondo F.D., Baxter L., Bensasson D., Beynon J.L., Chapman J., Damasceno C.M.B., Dorrance A.E., Dou D., Dickerman A.W., Dubchak I.L., Garbelotto M., Gijzen M., Gordon S.G., Govers F., Grunwald N.J., Huang W., Ivors K.L., Jones R.W., Kamoun S., Krampis K., Lamour K.H., Lee M.-K., McDonald W.H., Medina M., Meijer H.J.G., Nordberg E.K., Maclean D.J., Ospina-Giraldo M.D., Morris P.F., Phuntumart V., Putnam N.H., Rash S., Rose J.K.C., Sakihama Y., Salamov A.A., Savidor A., Scheuring C.F., Smith B.M., Sobral B.W.S., Terry A., Torto-Alalibo T.A., Win J., Xu Z., Zhang H., Grigoriev I.V., Rokhsar D.S., Boore J.L. Phytophthora genome sequences uncover evolutionary origins and mechanisms of pathogenesis. Science. 2006;313:1261–1266. doi: 10.1126/science.1128796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Grünwald N. Genome sequences of Phytophthora enable translational plant disease management and accelerate research. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2012:37–41. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cooke D.E.L. Tracking the sudden oak death pathogen. Mol. Ecol. 2007;16:3735–3736. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03430.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Goss E.M. Genome-enabled analysis of plant pathogen migration. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2014;53 doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080614-115936. 150504162158003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genomics Data are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES