Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Physiology logoLink to Frontiers in Physiology
. 2015 Dec 2;6:367. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00367

The Perivascular Niche and Self-Renewal of Stem Cells

Min Oh 1, Jacques E Nör 1,2,3,*
PMCID: PMC4667083  PMID: 26696901

Abstract

Postnatal stem cells are typically found in niches that provide signaling cues to maintain their self-renewal and multipotency. While stem cell populations may serve distinct purposes within their tissue of origin, understanding the conserved biology of stem cells and their respective niches provides insights to the behavior of these cells during homeostasis and tissue repair. Here, we discuss perivascular niches of two distinct stem cell populations (i.e., hematopoietic stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells) and explore mechanisms that sustain these stem cells postnatally. We highlight work that demonstrates the impact of cellular crosstalk to stem cell self-renewal and maintenance of functional perivascular niches. We also discuss the importance of the crosstalk within the perivascular niche to the biology of stem cells, and describe the regenerative potential of perivascular cells. We postulate that signaling events that establish and/or stabilize the perivascular niche, particularly through the modulation of self-renewing factors, are key to the long-term success of regenerated tissues.

Keywords: regenerative endodontics, perivascular niche, inflammation, wound healing, tissue engineering

Introduction

Physiological stem cells enable tissue regeneration and repair. Vacanti and colleagues postulated that knowledge generated through research guided toward the regeneration of living tissues could lead to the cure of certain congenital and hereditary disorders, as well as to the development of strategies for tissue engineering that could address the shortage of donor tissues/organs (Vacanti and Langer, 1999). Successful regeneration of living tissues and/or organs that integrate functionally and properly within the host could also improve the quality of life of patients. Here, we highlight the role of postnatal stem cell populations in tissue repair and regeneration, with focus on their microenvironment (i.e., their niche). Stem cells are maintained in specialized niches, where they are relatively quiescent until external signals (e.g., wound) disrupt this equilibrium and drive their fate through downstream lineages that result in fully differentiated cells. Understanding the biology of these stem cell niches and mechanisms that drive stem cell fate can ultimately provide insights into potential signaling targets that can be exploited to regenerate functional tissues.

Hematopoietic stem cells

Seminal work led to the identification of hematopoietic progenitor populations that are multipotent and self-renewing (Thomas et al., 1957; Till and McCulloch, 1961; Morrison et al., 1997). Thomas and colleagues introduced the concept of utilizing hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) for regenerative medicine when they infused intravenously suspensions of bone marrow-derived cells into patients that underwent radiation and chemotherapy (Thomas et al., 1957, 1975a). These initial findings led to the development of therapies based on bone marrow transplantation that are now commonly utilized to repopulate lost hematopoietic stem cells (Thomas et al., 1957, 1975a,b). In association with the discovery of HSCs within the bone marrow, these findings contributed significantly to the use of multipotent and self-renewing cell populations for regenerative medicine (Till and McCulloch, 1961). The long-term survival rates of patients, and the existence of donor cells within the bone marrow of long-term survivors, provided compelling evidence that self-renewing cells reside within the bone marrow (Storb et al., 1969; Thomas et al., 1975b). Importantly, evidence of spleen colony-forming cells, derived from stem cell populations, suggested that stem cells reside in “niches” (Becker et al., 1963; Siminovitch et al., 1963; Schofield, 1978).

Several studies exhibited evidence of a perivascular niche for the maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells in vitro and in vivo (Cardier and Barberá-Guillem, 1997; Ohneda et al., 1998; Li et al., 2004; Kiel et al., 2005; Yao et al., 2005; Ding et al., 2012; Corselli et al., 2013). Kiel and colleagues concluded that hematopoietic stem cells within the spleen and bone marrow were associated with the sinusoidal endothelium, suggesting a perivascular niche (Kiel et al., 2005). Others demonstrated that hematopoietic stem cells localize to heterogeneous vascular niches in the bone marrow including arteries and arterioles, and suggested that these niches regulate their quiescence (Bourke et al., 2009; Kunisaki et al., 2013; Nombela-Arrieta et al., 2013). Indeed, the evidence illustrated that these perivascular niches are comprised of various cell types, each possessing a distinct function to contribute to the maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells. For instance, mesenchymal stromal cells secrete key factors including stem cell factor (SCF) and CXCL12 that contribute to the function of the perivascular niche, and the biology of hematopoietic stem cells (Sugiyama et al., 2006; Méndez-Ferrer et al., 2010; Greenbaum et al., 2013). Notably, emerging evidence suggests that endothelial cell-secreted factors play a critical role in the maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells.

Endothelial cell-secreted factors enabled hematopoietic stem cells to produce a significantly higher number of CFU-S8 counts when compared to controls, suggesting that these factors enhance the proliferation and/or survival of the stem cell subpopulation (Li et al., 2004). Conditional knockout mice provided further support to the function of stem cell factor (SCF) to the survival of hematopoietic stem cells. When Ding and colleagues utilized a tamoxifen-inducible conditional knockout system for SCF (Ubc-creER; Scffl∕fl), the hematopoietic stem cell population (CD150+CD48−Lin−Sca1+c-Kit+) was depleted within the bone marrow and spleen postnatally (Ding et al., 2012). As SCF is a ligand for c-Kit, and inhibiting c-Kit resulted in the loss of hematopoietic progenitor cells, these results suggested that SCF is required for postnatal HSC maintenance (Zsebo et al., 1990; Ogawa et al., 1991; Ding et al., 2012). Furthermore, when they conditionally deleted Scf from endothelial cells (Tie2-Cre; Scffl∕−), the fraction of hematopoietic stem cells decreased significantly (Ding et al., 2012). These observations were confirmed by selective deletion of gp130 expression in endothelial cells, utilizing Cre/loxP-mediated recombination (Tie2-Cre;gp130flox∕flox) (Yao et al., 2005). Collectively, several studies showed that endothelial cells are necessary for bone marrow homeostasis and regeneration, suggesting that signaling events mediated by endothelial cells play a major role in the maintenance of postnatal hematopoietic stem cells (Hooper et al., 2009; Butler et al., 2010; Kobayashi et al., 2010; Poulos et al., 2013).

Mesenchymal stem cells

Friedenstein and colleagues discovered non-hematopoietic stem cells adherent to tissue culture conditions capable of forming fibroblastic colony forming units (CFU-F) (Friedenstein et al., 1970). Later coined as “mesenchymal stem cells” (MSC), these cell populations were self-renewing and were capable to give rise to multiple lineages (Caplan, 1991; Prockop, 1997; Pittenger et al., 1999; Bianco, 2007; Sacchetti et al., 2007). However, inconsistencies in defining mesenchymal stem cells presented various challenges to investigators within the field (Dominici et al., 2006). Emerging evidence showed that perivascular cells within the bone marrow exhibited characteristics of mesenchymal stem cells, forming a unique niche (Sacchetti et al., 2007; Méndez-Ferrer et al., 2010).

Perivascular cells were further investigated in various fetal and postnatal human tissues that identified these cell populations as mesenchymal stem cells (da Silva Meirelles et al., 2006; Crisan et al., 2008; Zannettino et al., 2008; Paul et al., 2012). Utilizing flow cell sorting, perivascular cells expressed mesenchymal stem cells markers (e.g., CD10, CD13, CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105) and did not express several markers for other cell types (e.g., CD56, CD106, CD133) (Crisan et al., 2008). Several studies proposed that pericytes exhibit the potential to commit to osteogenic, chondrogenic, and/or adipogenic lineages (Doherty et al., 1998; Farrington-Rock et al., 2004). Notably, long-term cultured perivascular cells possessed the ability to differentiate into mesenchymal stem cell lineages, including chondrocytes, multilocular adipocytes, and osteocytes (da Silva Meirelles et al., 2006; Crisan et al., 2008). Isolated pericytes formed mineralized nodules and structures resembling chondrocytes, and adipocytes both in vitro and in vivo (Doherty et al., 1998; Farrington-Rock et al., 2004). Furthermore, mRNA analysis of pericytes cultured in inductive conditions showed an upregulation of chondrogenic (i.e., Type II collagen, Sox9, aggrecan) and adipogenic (i.e., peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma [PPAR-γ]) markers (Farrington-Rock et al., 2004). Further investigation into mesenchymal stem cell subpopulations in various tissues led to their identification and characterization within oral tissues, including teeth, periapical structures, and periodontal ligament.

Multipotent and self-renewing subpopulations of MSC-like cells was identified within the dental pulp of permanent (Gronthos et al., 2000) and primary teeth (Miura et al., 2003). Emerging evidence demonstrated that these dental stem cells are capable of differentiating into various other cell types, including osteoblasts (osteocytes), odontoblasts, and adipocytes (Gronthos et al., 2000; Miura et al., 2003). It has been also demonstrated that these cells can differentiate into neural cells (Nosrat et al., 2004; Sakai et al., 2012; De Berdt et al., 2015). Interestingly, these stem cells of dental origin have been implicated in partial recovery of movement when transplanted at spinal cord injury sites in laboratory animals (Sakai et al., 2012; De Berdt et al., 2015). And finally, work from our laboratory has demonstrated that dental pulp stem cells are capable of differentiating into vascular endothelial cells (Cordeiro et al., 2008; Sakai et al., 2010; Bento et al., 2013). Notably, these MSC-derived blood vessels are capable of forming anastomoses with the host vasculature to become functional, i.e., blood-carrying vessels (Cordeiro et al., 2008; Bento et al., 2013).

A perivascular niche was identified in postnatal mesenchymal stem cell populations within dental tissues, particularly the dental pulp (Shi and Gronthos, 2003; Machado et al., 2015). These cells residing near the dental pulp blood vessels exhibit hallmark features of stem cells, i.e., multipotency and self-renewal (Figure 1). Seminal work by Shi and colleagues utilized the putative marker STRO1 to identify mesenchymal stem cell subpopulations within the bone marrow and dental pulp, and to verify the potential existence of perivascular niches in these two tissues (Shi and Gronthos, 2003). When STRO1-positive bone marrow stem cells (BMSC) and DPSC were analyzed, they showed expression of pericyte markers (α-smooth muscle actin, CD146) but not von Willebrand factor, a marker for platelets and endothelial cells (Shi and Gronthos, 2003). These findings suggested that these stem cell populations might reside in a perivascular niche and/or have the capacity to differentiate into other cell populations, such as pericytes.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Perivascular niche and multipotency of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC). Mesenchymal stem cells reside in perivascular niches where they undergo self-renewal and maintain the surrounding cells/tissue. Under specific signaling conditions, MSC can undergo differentiation into the osteoblastic (osteocytic), endothelial, chondrocytic, adipocytic, odontoblastic, and neural lineages.

As the origin and behavior of mesenchymal stem cell become better understood, more specific cellular markers can be identified and utilized to identify these cells for investigation or clinical application. Interestingly, recent studies explored potential markers that are more specific to mesenchymal stem cell populations. Lineage tracing studies on Gli1+ cells within a murine incisor pulp suggested that Gli1 might be a possible marker for mesenchymal stem cells (Zhao et al., 2014). Utilizing an inducible tagging construct (Gli1-CE;Zsgreen) to follow Gli1+ cells and their progenitors, ZsGreen+ cells were expressed near the cervical loop of mouse incisors within 72 h. After 4-weeks, ZsGreen+ cells populated the entire pulp mesenchyme up to the tip of the incisor suggesting that Gli1+ cells were responsible for populating the dental pulp. Indeed, ZsGreen+ cells were still detected when following Gli1+ derivatives for up to 17.5 months, suggesting self-renewal of Gli1+ mesenchymal cells (Zhao et al., 2014). Furthermore, Gli1+ cells are found in networks around the vasculature, and Gli1+PDGFRβ+ (platelet derived growth factor receptor-β) cells represent mesenchymal stem cell-like perivascular cells (Zhao et al., 2014; Kramann et al., 2015). The surface marker profile of these mesenchymal stem cell-like perivascular cells was maintained both in culture and in vivo (Kramann et al., 2015). Interestingly, as murine incisors develop continuously, dentinal development was severely stunted after vascular damage to the dental pulp, suggesting the functional relevance of the perivascular niche (Zhao et al., 2014). These findings further suggested that mesenchymal stem cell are located and maintained near the host vasculature.

Recent evidence further strengthened the hypothesis that DPSC reside in close proximity to blood vessels and nerves in the dental pulp tissue. These observations were derived from the identification of cells expressing the putative stem cell markers aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH)-1, CD90, and STRO1 in close proximity to pulp blood vessels (Machado et al., 2015). DPSC can generate spheroid bodies when cultured in ultra-low attachment conditions, suggesting the existence of a self-renewing subpopulation of cells within DPSC (Xiao et al., 2014). These self-renewing cells form and sustain growth of spheroid bodies in low attachment culture systems (Reynolds and Weiss, 1996; Weiss et al., 1996), particularly in presence of endothelial cell-derived factors. Collectively, these data demonstrated that endothelial cells serve as a source of factors that stimulate self-renewal of mesenchymal stem cells in the dental pulp, thus playing a critical role on the maintenance of the mesenchymal stem cell pool within perivascular niches.

Stem cell niches and dental tissue regeneration

While the presence of differentiated cells is critical for the function of tissues that have been regenerated, the ability to reconstitute the microenvironment that sustains stem cells is likely important for the successful long-term outcome of the tissue. In fact, it is possible that creation (or regeneration) of the stem cell niche might be sufficient for effective tissue regeneration. Targeting the perivascular niche via regeneration of the vasculature exhibited promising results in the context of dental pulp tissue engineering. A dentin/pulp-like complex was regenerated in vivo utilizing a tooth slice/scaffold model of dental pulp regeneration, where tooth slice/scaffolds from human third molars were seeded with SHED (stem cells from exfoliated deciduous teeth) cells and human dermal microvascular endothelial cells (HDMEC) and co-transplanted into the subcutaneous space of severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice (Cordeiro et al., 2008; Sakai et al., 2010; Bento et al., 2013). Interestingly, when SHED cells were treated with recombinant human vascular endothelial growth factor (rhVEGF)165 within tooth slice/scaffolds in vitro, they showed increased angiogenic potential and strong expression of endothelial cell markers (e.g., VEGFR2, PECAM1) (Sakai et al., 2010). These data suggested that these cells had the potential to differentiate into vascular endothelial cells in addition to the expected differentiation into odontoblasts. We observed that SHED cells have the potential to differentiate into endothelial cells in vivo, forming functional blood vessels that anastomized with the host vasculature becoming functional (blood-carrying) vessels (Cordeiro et al., 2008; Sakai et al., 2010; Bento et al., 2013). Such data suggested that a sub-population of the dental pulp stem cells could differentiate into tissue-specific odontoblasts while other sub-population may differentiate into vascular endothelial cells possibly recreating perivascular niches for stem cells in the regenerated tissue.

Recent evidence on the effects of endothelial cell-derived factors on head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cells provided valuable insights on the cellular crosstalk within the perivascular niche. Endothelial cell-derived epidermal growth factor (EGF) promoted epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) of HNSCC cells, endowing them with cancer stem cell characteristics (Zhang et al., 2014). As EMT has been linked to the acquisition of stem cell properties, it is without surprise that endothelial cell-derived EGF induced self-renewal via upregulation of Bmi-1 expression (Zhang et al., 2014). Interestingly, endothelial cells can also stimulate the self-renewal of neural stem cells (Shen et al., 2004). Neural stem cells co-cultured with endothelial cells exhibited delayed differentiation, shown by expression of neural progenitor markers (Nestin+ and LeX+) and an enhanced neural productive potential (Shen et al., 2004). These data further highlighted the significance of signaling within the perivascular niche for the biology of stem cells.

As stem cells are both, multipotent and self-renewing, a putative approach for tissue regeneration is based on the targeting of self-renewal factors to induce “stemness” of a sub-population of cells. Emulating the niche via controlled regulation of self-renewal pathways might allow stem cells to continue undergoing some level of asymmetric division, where one daughter cell would remain undifferentiated (i.e., self-renewal) while the other daughter cell would undergo differentiation (i.e., multipotency). Emerging evidence demonstrated the important role of self-renewal factors in dental tissue formation. For example, as Bmi-1 was shown to be a key regulator of neural stem cell self-renewal (Molofsky et al., 2003, 2005; Park et al., 2003) Bmi-1−∕− mice incisors exhibited thinner dentinal and enamel layers (Biehs et al., 2013). These data illustrated that self-renewal is essential for odontogenesis, and suggested that this process is likely very important within the context of dental tissue engineering. We are currently designing experiments that will test this hypothesis.

Conclusions

In summary, the interaction of stem cells with other cellular components of their niche is critical for self-renewal and the maintenance of the stem cell pool, and for the determination of their differentiation fate via multipotency. Mesenchymal stem cells play a vital role in the long-term maintenance of several tissues (da Silva Meirelles et al., 2006; Crisan et al., 2008). Likewise, emerging evidence suggest that mesenchymal stem cells and their niche are critically important for dental tissue regeneration by providing key molecular cues for the maintenance of diverse stem cells populations. We propose that therapeutic efforts to regenerate the stem cell niche are important for tissue engineering. Thus, studies focused on the understanding of conserved mechanisms regulating the biology of stem cell niches will provide valuable insights on the function and maintenance of stem cells, and may have a positive impact on the development of strategies that enhance the long-term outcomes of regenerated tissues and organs.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

Funded by grant # T32-DE007057 (MO) and by R01-DE21410 from the NIH/NIDCR (JN).

References

  1. Becker A. J., McCulloch E. A., Till J. E. (1963). Cytological demonstration of the clonal nature of spleen colonies derived from transplanted mouse marrow cells. Nature 197, 452–454. 10.1038/197452a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bento L. W., Zhang Z., Imai A., Nör F., Dong Z., Shi S., et al. (2013). Endothelial differentiation of SHED requires MEK1/ERK signaling. J. Dent. Res. 1, 51–57. 10.1177/0022034512466263 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bianco P. (2007). Self-renewing mesenchymal progenitors in the bone marrow and in other mesodermal tissues. J. Stem Cells Regen. Med. 1, 44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Biehs B., Hu J. K., Strauli N. B., Sangiorgi E., Jung H., Heber R. P., et al. (2013). BMI1 represses Ink4a/Arf and Hox genes to regulate stem cells in the rodent incisor. Nat. Cell Biol. 7, 846–852. 10.1038/ncb2766 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bourke V. A., Watchman C. J., Reith J. D., Jorgensen M. L., Dieudonnè A., Bolch W. E. (2009). Spatial gradients of blood vessels and hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells within the marrow cavities of the human skeleton. Blood 114, 4077–4080. 10.1182/blood-2008-12-192922 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Butler J. M., Nolan D. J., Vertes E. L., Varnum-Finney B., Kobayashi H., Hooper A. T., et al. (2010). Endothelial cells are essential for the self-renewal and repopulation of Notch-dependent hematopoietic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 3, 251–264. 10.1016/j.stem.2010.02.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Caplan A. I. (1991). Mesenchymal stem cells. J. Orthop. Res. 5, 641–650. 10.1002/jor.1100090504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cardier J. E., Barberá-Guillem E. (1997). Extramedullary hematopoiesis in the adult mouse liver is associated with specific hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells. Hepatology 1, 165–175. 10.1002/hep.510260122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cordeiro M. M., Dong Z., Kaneko T., Zhang Z., Miyazawa M., Shi S., et al. (2008). Dental pulp tissue engineering with stem cells from exfoliated deciduous teeth. J. Endod. 8, 962–969. 10.1016/j.joen.2008.04.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Corselli M., Chin C. J., Parekh C., Sahaghian A., Wang W., Ge S., et al. (2013). Perivascular support of human hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Blood 15, 2891–2901. 10.1182/blood-2012-08-451864 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Crisan M., Yap S., Casteilla L., Chen C. W., Corselli M., Park T. S., et al. (2008). A perivascular origin for mesenchymal stem cells in multiple human organs. Cell Stem Cell 3, 301–313. 10.1016/j.stem.2008.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. da Silva Meirelles L., Chagastelles P. C., Nardi N. B. (2006). Mesenchymal stem cells reside in virtually all post-natal organs and tissues. J. Cell Sci. 11, 2204–2213. 10.1242/jcs.02932 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. De Berdt P., Vanacker J., Ucakar B., Elens L., Diogenes A., Leprince J. G., et al. (2015). Dental apical papilla as therapy for spinal cord injury. J. Dent. Res. 11, 1575–1581. 10.1177/0022034515604612 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ding L., Saunders T. L., Enikolopov G., Morrison S. J. (2012). Endothelial and perivascular cells maintain haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 7382, 457–462. 10.1038/nature10783 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Doherty M. J., Ashton B. A., Walsh S., Beresford J. N., Grant M. E., Canfield A. E. (1998). Vascular pericytes express osteogenic potential in vitro and in vivo. J. Bone Miner. Res. 5, 828–838. 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.5.828 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dominici M., Le Blanc K., Mueller I., Slaper-Cortenbach I., Marini F., Krause D., et al. (2006). Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International society for cellular therapy position statement. Cytotherapy 4, 315–317. 10.1080/14653240600855905 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Farrington-Rock C., Crofts N. J., Doherty M. J., Ashton B. A., Griffin-Jones C., Canfield A. E. (2004). Chondrogenic and adipogenic potential of microvascular pericytes. Circulation 15, 2226–2232. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000144457.55518.E5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Friedenstein A. J., Chailakhjan R. K., Lalykina K. S. (1970). The development of fibroblast colonies in monolayer cultures of guinea-pig bone marrow and spleen cells. Cell Tissue Kinet. 4, 393–403. 10.1111/j.1365-2184.1970.tb00347.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Greenbaum A., Hsu Y. M., Day R. B., Schuettpelz L. G., Christopher M. J., Borgerding J. N., et al. (2013). CXCL12 in early mesenchymal progenitors is required for haematopoietic stem-cell maintenance. Nature 7440, 227–230. 10.1038/nature11926 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gronthos S., Mankani M., Brahim J., Robey P. G., Shi S. (2000). Postnatal human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) in vitro and in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 25, 13625–13630. 10.1073/pnas.240309797 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hooper A. T., Butler J. M., Nolan D. J., Kranz A., Iida K., Kobayashi M., et al. (2009). Engraftment and reconstitution of hematopoiesis is dependent on VEGFR2-mediated regeneration of sinusoidal endothelial cells. Cell Stem Cell 3, 263–274. 10.1016/j.stem.2009.01.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kiel M. J., Yilmaz O. H., Iwashita T., Yilmaz O. H., Terhorst C., Morrison S. J. (2005). SLAM family receptors distinguish hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and reveal endothelial niches for stem cells. Cell 7, 1109–1121. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.05.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kobayashi H., Butler J. M., O'Donnell R., Kobayashi M., Ding B. S., Bonner B., et al. (2010). Angiocrine factors from Akt-activated endothelial cells balance self-renewal and differentiation of haematopoietic stem cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 1046–1056. 10.1038/ncb2108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kramann R., Schneider R. K., DiRocco D. P., Machado F., Fleig S., Bondzie P. A., et al. (2015). Perivascular Gli1+ progenitors are key contributors to injury-induced organ fibrosis. Cell Stem Cell 1, 51–66. 10.1016/j.stem.2014.11.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kunisaki Y., Bruns I., Scheiermann C., Ahmed J., Pinho S., Zhang D., et al. (2013). Arteriolar niches maintain haematopoietic stem cell quiescence. Nature 502, 637–643. 10.1038/nature12612 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Li W., Johnson S. A., Shelley W. C., Yoder M. C. (2004). Hematopoietic stem cell repopulating ability can be maintained in vitro by some primary endothelial cells. Exp. Hematol. 12, 1226–1237. 10.1016/j.exphem.2004.09.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Machado C. V., Passos S. T., Campos T. M., Bernardi L., Vilas-Bôas D. S., Nör J. E., et al. (2015). The dental pulp stem cell niche based on aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 expression. Int. Endod. J. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1111/iej.12511 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Méndez-Ferrer S., Michurina T. V., Ferraro F., Mazloom A. R., Macarthur B. D., Lira S. A., et al. (2010). Mesenchymal and haematopoietic stem cells form a unique bone marrow niche. Nature 466, 829–834. 10.1038/nature09262 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Miura M., Gronthos S., Zhao M., Lu B., Fisher L. W., Robey P. G., et al. (2003). SHED: stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 5807–5812. 10.1073/pnas.0937635100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Molofsky A. V., He S., Bydon M., Morrison S. J., Pardal R. (2005). Bmi-1 promotes neural stem cell self-renewal and neural development but not mouse growth and survival by repressing the p16Ink4a and p19Arf senescence pathways. Genes Dev. 12, 1432–1437. 10.1101/gad.1299505 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Molofsky A. V., Pardal R., Iwashita T., Park I. K., Clarke M. F., Morrison S. J. (2003). Bmi-1 dependence distinguishes neural stem cell self-renewal from progenitor proliferation. Nature 6961, 962–967. 10.1038/nature02060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Morrison S. J., Wandycz A. M., Hemmati H. D., Wright D. E., Weissman I. L. (1997). Identification of a lineage of multipotent hematopoietic progenitors. Development 10, 1929–1939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Nombela-Arrieta C., Pivarnik G., Winkel B., Canty K. J., Harley B., Mahoney J. E., et al. (2013). Quantitative imaging of haematopoietic stem and progenitor cell localization and hypoxic status in the bone marrow microenvironment. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 533–543. 10.1038/ncb2730 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nosrat I. V., Smith C. A., Mullally P., Olson L., Nosrat C. A. (2004). Dental pulp cells provide neurotrophic support for dopaminergic neurons and differentiate into neurons in vitro; implications for tissue engineering and repair in the nervous system. Eur. J. Neurosci. 9, 2388–2398. 10.1111/j.0953-816X.2004.03314.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ogawa M., Matsuzaki Y., Nishikawa S., Hayashi S., Kunisada T., Sudo T., et al. (1991). Expression and function of c-kit in hemopoietic progenitor cells. J. Exp. Med. 1, 63–71. 10.1084/jem.174.1.63 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ohneda O., Fennie C., Zheng Z., Donahue C., La H., Villacorta R., et al. (1998). Hematopoietic stem cell maintenance and differentiation are supported by embryonic aorta-gonad-mesonephros region-derived endothelium. Blood 3, 908–919. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Park I. K., Qian D., Kiel M., Becker M. W., Pihalja M., Weissman I. L., et al. (2003). Bmi-1 is required for maintenance of adult self-renewing haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 6937, 302–305. 10.1038/nature01587 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Paul G., Özen I., Christophersen N. S., Reinbothe T., Bengzon J., Visse E. (2012). The adult human brain harbors multipotent perivascular mesenchymal stem cells. PLoS ONE 4:e35577. 10.1371/journal.pone.0035577 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Pittenger M. F., Mackay A. M., Beck S. C., Jaiswal R. K., Douglas R., Mosca J. D., et al. (1999). Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 5411, 143–147. 10.1126/science.284.5411.143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Poulos M. G., Guo P., Kofler N. M., Pinho S., Gutkin M. C., Tikhonova A., et al. (2013). Endothelial Jagged-1 is necessary for homeostatic and regenerative hematopoiesis. Cell Rep. 5, 1022–1034. 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.07.048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Prockop D. J. (1997). Marrow stromal cells as stem cells for nonhematopoietic tissues. Science 5309, 71–74. 10.1126/science.276.5309.71 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Reynolds B. A., Weiss S. (1996). Clonal and population analyses demonstrate that an EGF-responsive mammalian embryonic CNS precursor is a stem cell. Dev. Biol. 175, 1–13. 10.1006/dbio.1996.0090 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Sacchetti B., Funari A., Michienzi S., Di Cesare S., Piersanti S., Saggio I., et al. (2007). Self-renewing osteoprogenitors in bone marrow sinusoids can organize a hematopoietic microenvironment. Cell 2, 324–336. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sakai K., Yamamoto A., Matsubara K., Nakamura S., Naruse M., Yamagata M., et al. (2012). Human dental pulp-derived stem cells promote locomotor recovery after complete transection of the rat spinal cord by multiple neuro-regenerative mechanisms. J. Clin. Invest. 1, 80–90. 10.1172/JCI59251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Sakai V. T., Zhang Z., Dong Z., Neiva K. G., Machado M. A., Shi S., et al. (2010). SHED differentiate into functional odontoblasts and endothelium. J. Dent. Res. 8, 791–796. 10.1177/0022034510368647 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Schofield R. (1978). The relationship between the spleen colony-forming cell and the haemopoietic stem cell. Blood Cells 4, 7–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Shen Q., Goderie S. K., Jin L., Karanth N., Sun Y., Abramova N., et al. (2004). Endothelial cells stimulate self-renewal and expand neurogenesis of neural stem cells. Science 5675, 1338–1340. 10.1126/science.1095505 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Shi S., Gronthos S. (2003). Perivascular niche of postnatal mesenchymal stem cells in human bone marrow and dental pulp. J. Bone Miner. Res. 4, 696–704. 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.4.696 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Siminovitch L., McCulloch E. A., Till J. E. (1963). The distribution of colony-forming cells among spleen colonies. J. Cell. Physiol. 62, 327–336. 10.1002/jcp.1030620313 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Storb R., Epstein R. B., Rudolph R. H., Thomas E. D. (1969). Allogeneic canine bone marrow transplantation following cyclophosphamide. Transplantation 5, 378–386. 10.1097/00007890-196905000-00007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Sugiyama T., Kohara H., Noda M., Nagasawa T. (2006). Maintenance of the hematopoietic stem cell pool by CXCL12-CXCR4 chemokine signaling in bone marrow stromal cell niches. Immunity 6, 977–988. 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.10.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Thomas E. D., Lochte H. L., Jr., Lu W. C., Ferrebee J. W. (1957). Intravenous infusion of bone marrow in patients receiving radiation and chemotherapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 11, 491–496. 10.1056/NEJM195709122571102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Thomas E. D., Storb R., Clift R. A., Fefer A., Johnson L., Neiman P. E., et al. (1975b). Bone-marrow transplantation (second of two parts). N. Engl. J. Med. 17, 895–902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Thomas E., Storb R., Clift R. A., Fefer A., Johnson F. L., Neiman P. E., et al. (1975a). Bone-marrow transplantation (first of two parts). N. Engl. J. Med. 16, 832–843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Till J. E., McCulloch E. A. (1961). A direct measurement of the radiation sensitivity of normal mouse bone marrow cells. Radiat. Res. 14, 213–222. 10.2307/3570892 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Vacanti J. P., Langer R. (1999). Tissue engineering: the design and fabrication of living replacement devices for surgical reconstruction and transplantation. Lancet 1, S132–S134. 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)90247-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Weiss S., Reynolds B. A., Vescovi A. L., Morshead C., Craig C. G., van der Kooy D. (1996). Is there a neural stem cell in the mammalian forebrain? Trends Neurosci. 19, 387–393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Xiao L., Kumazawa Y., Okamura H. (2014). Cell death, cavitation and spontaneous multi-differentiation of dental pulp stem cells-derived spheroids in vitro: a journey to survival and organogenesis. Biol. Cell 12, 405–419. 10.1111/boc.201400024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Yao L., Yokota T., Xia L., Kincade P. W., McEver R. P. (2005). Bone marrow dysfunction in mice lacking the cytokine receptor gp130 in endothelial cells. Blood 13, 4093–4101. 10.1182/blood-2005-02-0671 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Zannettino A. C., Paton S., Arthur A., Khor F., Itescu S., Gimble J. M., et al. (2008). Multipotential human adipose-derived stromal stem cells exhibit a perivascular phenotype in vitro and in vivo. J. Cell. Physiol. 2, 413–421. 10.1002/jcp.21210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhang Z., Dong Z., Lauxen I. S., Filho M. S., Nör J. E. (2014). Endothelial cell-secreted EGF induces epithelial to mesenchymal transition and endows head and neck cancer cells with stem-like phenotype. Cancer Res. 10, 2869–2881. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Zhao H., Feng J., Seidel K., Shi S., Klein O., Sharpe P., et al. (2014). Secretion of shh by a neurovascular bundle niche supports mesenchymal stem cell homeostasis in the adult mouse incisor. Cell Stem Cell 2, 160–173. 10.1016/j.stem.2013.12.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Zsebo K. M., Williams D. A., Geissler E. N., Broudy V. C., Martin F. H., Atkins H. L., et al. (1990). Stem cell factor is encoded at the Sl locus of the mouse and is the ligand for the c-kit tyrosine kinase receptor. Cell 1, 213–224. 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90302-U [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Physiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES