Abstract
Background and Purpose
Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease, in which ‘vulnerable plaques’ have been recognized as the underlying risk factor for coronary disease. Regulator of G‐protein signalling (RGS) 5 controls endothelial cell function and inflammation. In this study, we explored the effect of RGS5 on atherosclerosis and the potential underlying mechanisms.
Experimental Approach
RGS5−/− apolipoprotein E (ApoE)−/− and ApoE −/− littermates were fed a high‐fat diet for 28 weeks. Total aorta surface and lipid accumulation were measured by Oil Red O staining and haematoxylin–eosin staining was used to analyse the morphology of atherosclerotic lesions. Inflammatory cell infiltration and general inflammatory mediators were examined by immunofluorescence staining. Apoptotic endothelial cells and macrophages were assayed with TUNEL. Expression of RGS5and adhesion molecules, and ERK1/2 phosphorylation were evaluated by co‐staining with CD31. Expression of mRNA and protein were determined by quantitative real‐time PCR and Western blotting respectively.
Key Results
Atherosclerotic phenotypes were significantly accelerated in RGS5−/− ApoE −/− mice, as indicated by increased inflammatory mediator expression and apoptosis of endothelial cells and macrophages. RGS5 deficiency enhanced instability of vulnerable plaques by increasing infiltration of macrophages in parallel with the accumulation of lipids, and decreased smooth muscle cell and collagen content. Mechanistically, increased activation of NF‐κB and MAPK/ERK 1/2 could be responsible for the accelerated development of atherosclerosis in RGS5‐deficient mice.
Conclusions and Implications
RGS5 deletion accelerated development of atherosclerosis and decreased the stability of atherosclerotic plaques partly through activating NF‐κB and the MEK‐ERK1/2 signalling pathways.
Linked Articles
This article is part of a themed section on Chinese Innovation in Cardiovascular Drug Discovery. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2015.172.issue-23
Abbreviations
- ApoE
apolipoprotein E
- CHD
coronary heart disease
- H&E
haematoxylin‐eosin
- ICAM‐1
intercellular adhesion molecue‐1
- LDL
low‐density lipoprotein
- MEK
MAPK/ERK kinase
- RGS
regulator of G‐protein signalling
- SMC
smooth muscle cell
- VCAM‐1
vascular cell adhesion molecule‐1
Tables of Links
These Tables list key protein targets and ligands in this article which are hyperlinked to corresponding entries in http://www.guidetopharmacology.org, the common portal for data from the IUPHAR/BPS Guide to PHARMACOLOGY (Pawson et al., 2014) and are permanently archived in the Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2013/14 (Alexander et al., 2013).
Introduction
Atherosclerosis is a crucial pathophysiological condition underlying cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in Western countries (Lloyd‐Jones et al., 2010). Over the last dozen years, compelling evidence has demonstrated that atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease (Ross, 1999; Libby, 2002) that is initiated by oxidative modification of low‐density lipoprotein (LDL)‐induced activation of endothelial dysfunction and that the subsequent secretion of chemokines and adhesion molecules attracts monocytes, which adhere to and migrate into the atherosclerotic lesions, where they differentiate into macrophages (Ley et al., 2007). Recently, the recognition of this process of atherosclerosis, including the defining features of ‘vulnerable plaques’, has been receiving substantial attention as a risk factor for the occurrence of various acute cardiovascular events, such as myocardial infarction, sudden cardiac death and stroke (Virmani et al., 2002). Thus, identifying the underlying molecular mechanisms that may attenuate atherosclerotic plaque progression and ultimate rupture is necessary for developing effective preventive and therapeutic strategies.
The regulator of G‐protein signalling (RGS) proteins constitute a family of proteins that has been identified as providing negative regulation of G–protein‐mediated receptor signalling pathways, which are required for many biological processes through the control of cellular function. These RGS proteins act as GTPase‐activating proteins (GAPs) and stimulate the hydrolysis of the Gα‐bound GTP back to GDP, resulting in the re‐association of the Gβγ subunit (Hollinger and Hepler, 2002). As a member of the B/R4 family, expression of RGS5 is enriched in the aorta, heart and skeletal muscle, particularly in pericytes, smooth muscle cells (SMC), and endothelial cells of cardiovascular tissues (Adams et al., 2000; Kirsch et al., 2001; Cho et al., 2003). To date, an increasing number of studies support the important role of RGS5 in endothelial function (Bondjers et al., 2003; Furuya et al., 2004; Hamzah et al., 2008; Gu et al., 2009). RGS5 has been identified as the first marker of angiogenic pericytes and is responsible for vessel remodelling, correlated with skin wound healing and tumour angiogenesis (Gu et al., 2009). In the tumour vasculature of human renal cell carcinoma, RGS5 is highly expressed in endothelial cells (Furuya et al., 2004). RGS5 deficiency results in pericyte maturation and vascular normalization and consequently improves the status of tumour hypoxia and reduces the leakiness of angiogenic vessels (Hamzah et al., 2008). This effect is similar to the observation that after transient cerebral ischaemia, the loss of RGS5, especially in pericytes surrounding brain capillaries, ameliorates oedema by reducing vascular permeability (Bondjers et al., 2003). Under the specific circumstance of hypoxia, RGS5 is reported to have an effect on the survival of endothelial cells (Jin et al., 2009). Moreover, RGS5 deletion increases dyslipidaemia, obesity, adipose tissue deposition, hepatic steatosis and circulating inflammation (Deng et al., 2012). However, little information is available on the function of RGS5 during the development of atherosclerosis.
In our study, a marked down‐regulation of RGS5 expression was observed in atheromatous plaques, from patients and from a mouse model of atherosclerosis induced by lack of apolipoprotein E (ApoE−/− mice). We therefore hypothesized that changes in endothelial cell‐derived RGS5 could be causally involved in atherogenesis. We used ApoE−/− mice also lacking RGS5 (RGS5−/−;ApoE−/−) to evaluate the regulatory effects of RGS5 on atherosclerosis and the potential underlying mechanisms.
Methods
Mice and diets
All animal care and experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University and the Institutional Review Board for Human Studies of Nanjing Medical University. All studies involving animals are reported in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting experiments involving animals (Kilkenny et al., 2010; McGrath et al., 2010). A total of 60 animals were used in the experiments described here.
The double‐knockout mice were generated by crossing ApoE−/− mice with RGS5 deletion (Li et al., 2010) and ApoE−/− littermates, 8 weeks of age, were used for the experiments. The 25 mice from each group were fed a high‐fat diet (15.8% fat and 1.25% cholesterol of diet) for up to 28 weeks. Body weight and fasting glucose levels were measured at the beginning of the experiment and when they were killed.
En face analysis of atherosclerosis and plaque histology
For en face analysis of the atherosclerotic lesions, the entire aorta, including the subclavian and the right and left common carotid arteries, were removed and stained with Oil Red O; the lesion areas were quantified with Image Pro Plus 6.0 (Image Metrology, Copenhagen, Denmark). Hearts were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin or OCT for the histological procedures. Consecutive 5 μm sections of the atrioventricular valve region of the heart were collected and stained with haematoxylin–eosin (H&E) for morphology or with Picrosirius Red to evaluate collagen deposition. For the morphometric analysis, lesion size was measured on six consecutive sections in 100 μm intervals from 10 different littermates in each group using Image Pro Plus 6.0. The Plaque stability score = (SMC area + collagen area) / (macrophage area + lipid area).
Quantitative real‐time PCR and Western blotting
Total mRNA was collected from the whole aorta using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and DNase‐treated RNA was reverse transcribed with a transcriptor first strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA). The examined genes were confirmed by quantitative real‐time PCR using LightCycler 480 SYBR Green 1 Master Mix (Roche) and the LightCycler 480 QPCR System (Roche); the relative transcript was normalized against GAPDH gene expression. Proteins were extracted from the aorta, which was homogenized in lysis buffer as described previously (Jiang et al., 2014). Total protein and nuclear protein were extracted from the whole aorta and primary cells respectively. Five micrograms of protein was separated by SDS‐PAGE (Invitrogen) and transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore, Beijing, China). The membranes were blocked in Tris‐buffered saline containing 5% non‐fat milk for 1 h at room temperature and incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. Next, after incubation with secondary antibodies, the membranes were treated with ECL reagents (170–5061; Bio‐Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) before being visualized using a FluorChem E Imager (Proteinsimple, San Jose, CA, USA). The specific protein expression was normalized against GAPDH protein expression. The following primary antibodies were used: RGS5 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Dallas, TX, USA; L16), P‐JNK1/2 (Cell Signaling Technology Inc., Danvers, MA, USA; 4668S), T‐JNK1/2/3 (Bioworld; BS3630), P‐MEK1/2 (Cell Signaling Technology Inc.; 9154), T‐MEK1/2 (Cell Signaling Technology Inc.; 9122), P‐ERK1/2 (Bioworld Technology Inc., St Louis Park, MN, USA; BS5016), T‐ERK1/2 (Bioworld Technology Inc.; BS3627), P‐p38 (Bioworld Technology Inc.; BS4766), T‐p38 (Bioworld Technology Inc.; BS3566), Cleaved‐caspase 3 (Cell Signaling Technology Inc.; 9661), p‐IκBα (Cell Signaling Technology Technology Inc.; 9246), T‐IκBα (Cell Signaling Technology Inc.; 4814), P‐p65 (Bioworld Technology Inc.; BS4135) and T‐p65 (Cell Signaling Technology Inc.; 4764S).
Immunofluorescence and TUNEL staining
The cross‐section samples of the aortic sinus were used for immunofluorescence. After deparaffination or drying in a ventilation hood, the slides were blocked in 10% goat serum diluted with PBS for 1 h and incubated overnight with various primary antibodies: anti‐RGS5 (goat polyclonal, 1:200 dilution, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti‐CD31 (rabbit polyclonal, 1:50 dilution, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA; goat polyclonal, 1:50 dilution, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti‐CD68 (rat monoclonal, 1:50 dilution, Bio‐Rad), anti‐smooth muscle actin (rat polyclonal, 1:100 dilution, Abcam), anti‐phospho p65 (rabbit monoclonal, 1:50 dilution, Bioworld Technology Inc.), anti‐ICAM‐1 (goat polyclonal, 1:100 dilution, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), anti‐vascular cell adhesion molecule‐1 (VCAM‐1; rat monoclonal, 1:100 dilution, Abcam), anti‐phospho ERK (rabbit monoclonal, 1:200 dilution, Cell Signaling Technology Inc.), anti‐IL‐6 (goat polyclonal, 1:100 dilution, R&D Systems) and anti‐IL‐10 (goat polyclonal, 1:100 dilution, R&D Systems). After rewarming at 37°C for 1 h, the sections then were washed in PBS and incubated with the relevant secondary antibody for another 1 h. The secondary antibodies used were Alexa Fluor 488 and 568 donkey anti‐rabbit IgG (1:200 dilution, Invitrogen), Alexa Fluor 568 donkey anti‐goat IgG (1:200 dilution, Invitrogen), and Alexa Fluor 568 donkey anti‐rat IgG (1:200 dilution, Invitrogen). The nuclei were stained with DAPI. For the co‐staining of TUNEL and CD31, CD68 or cleaved‐caspase3, the tissue sections were first stained with CD31, CD68 or cleaved‐caspase3 antibody, followed by TUNEL staining with an ApopTagPlus In Situ Apoptosis Fluorescein Detection Kit (S7111, Millipore) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Images were obtained using a fluorescence microscope (OLYMPUS BX51, Shinjuku‐ku, Tokyo, Japan) and the DP2‐BSW software (version2.2, Shinjuku‐ku, Tokyo, Japan) and the images were analysed with Image Pro Plus 6.0.
Human specimens
All of the procedures involving human samples complied with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and were approved by the Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University Institutional Review Board in Wuhan, China. Written informed consent was obtained from relevant families. The relevant details of the patients are provided in Table 1. Samples of atheromatous plaques were collected from the coronary artery of coronary heart disease (CHD) patients, and the control samples were obtained from the coronary artery of normal heart donors, when the hearts were not suitable for transplantation, for non‐cardiac reasons.
Table 1.
Relevant details of patients
| Type | Gender | Age (years) | Medications (major) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHD | Female | 61 | Nitroglycerin, dexamethasone, atorvastatin, heparin sodium |
| CHD | Male | 42 | Nicorandil, spirolactone, simvastatin, heparin sodium |
| CHD | Male | 58 | Atorvastatin, furosemide, trimetazidine, nicorandil |
| CHD | Male | 63 | Atorvastatin, metoprolol, heparin sodium |
| Donor | Male | 56 | N/A |
| Donor | Male | 58 | N/A |
| Donor | Male | 36 | N/A |
| Donor | Female | 57 | N/A |
CHD, coronary heart disease; N/A, not available.
Data analysis
The given data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. The comparisons among the groups were evaluated using a two‐tailed Student's t‐test. All statistical analyses were performed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software, version 16.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A P value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results
Down‐regulation of RGS5 in atheromatous plaques from humans and ApoE‐deficient male mice
To explore the potential role of RGS5 in the development of atherosclerosis, we examined whether RGS5 expression levels were altered in the endothelial cells of the atherosclerotic lesions. First, a morphological analysis based on H&E staining was performed using the right coronary artery from CHD patients, which is recognized as an atherosclerosis‐prone region, to assess the lesion grade according to the definition and classification method (Stary et al., 1995). Type V lesions showed several aspects of advanced atherosclerosis, such as fibrous thickening and cores of extracellular lipids (indicated by the black arrow), relative to the artery with no plaque from donated hearts from normal donors, which had not been used for transplantation because of non‐cardiac reasons (Figure 1A). Next, double‐immunofluorescence staining of the human coronary artery wall was performed to explore the expression of RGS5 and CD31 (a marker of endothelial cells). The representative images of obvious lesions (type V) revealed decreased expression of RGS5 in the endothelial cell layer compared with that in the non‐atherosclerotic lesions (Figure 1C and E). Subsequently, to determine whether atherosclerotic lesions from the mouse model also showed decreased RGS5 expression in the endothelial cells, we grouped atherosclerosis‐prone ApoE‐deficient (ApoE−/−) mice were treated with either normal chow or a high‐fat Western diet for 28 weeks. The latter group exhibited large plaques in the case of hyperlipaemia, as shown in the representative H&E image (Figure 1B). As expected, similar results were obtained with immunofluorescence co‐staining; Expression of RGS5 was markedly decreased in the endothelial cells of the atherosclerotic lesions induced by the high‐fat diet (Figure 1D and E). Taken together, these data suggest that the down‐regulation of RGS5 expression was concomitant with atherosclerosis‐associated endothelial cell activation in both mouse and human atherosclerotic plaques.
Figure 1.

Decreased expression of RGS5 in atheromatous plaques of human coronary artery and ApoE −/− mice. (A) Serial sections of human coronary artery from patients with CHD were stained with H&E and scored via the Stary classification method . The arrow indicates cap thickness and cores of extracellular lipid. Representative images are shown (original magnification, ×10 and ×20). Scale bar = 200 μm. (B) Cross‐sections of the aortic sinus from ApoE −/− mice fed either normal chow or a high‐fat diet and stained with H&E. Representative images are shown (original magnification, ×4 and ×20). Scale bar = 200 μm. (C, D) Representative images showing double‐immunofluorescence staining of human coronary arteries or cross‐sections of the aortic sinus from ApoE −/−mice, for RGS5 (red) and CD31 (endothelium, green). Scale bar = 200 μm. (E) Quantification of RGS5 fluorescent intensity in vascular endothelium of human and mice tissues. **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05 compared with ApoE −/−.
RGS5 deficiency accelerates the development of atherosclerosis
Next, to investigate whether RGS5 deletion in atherosclerotic lesions contributes to accelerated atherosclerosis, RGS5−/−ApoE−/− mice were generated by crossing RGS5−/− strain with ApoE−/− mice and identified by Western blot (Figure 2A). Then we placed groups of male RGS5−/−ApoE−/− and ApoE−/− littermates on a high‐fat diet for almost 28 weeks, starting from 8 weeks of age. Although the high‐fat diet led to hyperlipidaemia, there was no significant difference in the body weight or fasting glucose between the two genotypes (Table 2). En face analyses of the total aorta surface stained with Oil Red O revealed larger atherosclerotic lesions, and the quantitative data showed a 41% increase in RGS5−/−ApoE−/− mice, compared with the ApoE−/− mice (Figure 2B). In addition, we further analysed advanced atherosclerotic lesions at the aortic root stained with H&E. Quantitative analysis of representative images exhibited enhanced lesion areas in cross‐sections of the aortic sinus that were 30% larger in RGS5−/−ApoE−/− mice than in ApoE−/− controls (Figure 2C). We also analysed the necrotic cores of the plaques, a major determinant of plaque vulnerability. These cores initially result from the accumulation of apoptotic macrophages because of defective efferocytosis (Tabas, 2010). Analysis of lesions with thickened fibrous caps (indicated by the black arrows) revealed a pronounced increase in the total necrotic area, which was quantified at 38%, in the lesions of RGS5−/−ApoE−/− (Figure 2D). Collectively, these results together with the increased lesion and necrotic areas in RGS5−/−ApoE−/− mice demonstrate that RGS5 deficiency accelerated the development of atherosclerosis in this model.
Figure 2.

Deficiency of RGS5 promotes atherosclerosis in ApoE −/−mice. (A) The expression of RGS5 in RGS5−/− ApoE −/− mice and ApoE −/− controls. (B) Representative images of en face Oil Red O staining of aortas of RGS5−/− ApoE −/− and ApoE −/− littermates, n = 10. **P < 0.01 compared with ApoE −/−. (C) (left panel) Representative images of cross‐sections of the aortic sinus stained with H&E. (right panel) Quantification of the atheroma area. Six slides from different layers from at least 10 hearts in each group were used for the analysis. Scale bar = 200 μm; n = 10. **P < 0.01 compared with ApoE −/−. (D) (Left panel) Representative sections of H&E‐stained aortic root sections from RGS5−/− ApoE −/− and ApoE −/− mice; * = necrotic areas). The area between the arrows indicates cap thickness. (right panel) Quantification of anuclear, afibrotic, and eosin‐negative necrotic areas. Scale bar = 200 μm; n = 10.**P < 0.01 compared with ApoE −/−.
Table 2.
Metabolic characteristics of RGS5−/− ApoE −/−mice and ApoE −/−mice after 28 week feeding with high‐fat diet
| Mice | Index | 0 week high‐fat diet | 28 week high‐fat diet |
|---|---|---|---|
| ApoE−/− (N = 25) | Body weight, g | 24.0 ± 1.7 | 35.6 ± 8.1 |
| Glucose, mg·L−1 | 79 ± 9 | 86 ± 10 | |
| RGS5−/−ApoE−/− (N = 25) | Body weight, g | 24.6 ± 2.3 | 38.6 ± 10.1 |
| Glucose, mg·L−1 | 79 ± 10 | 89 ± 6 |
No significant difference was found between two groups of mice fed for 28 weeks.
RGS5 deficiency increases expression of inflammatory mediators
To examine whether enhanced inflammation is responsible for the severity of atherosclerotic lesions in vivo, we assessed the expression of inflammatory mediators, including cytokines and adhesion molecules, which contribute to the formation of atherosclerotic lesions. Analysis of the expression of adhesion molecules ICAM‐1 and VCAM‐1 by RT‐PCR showed a robust increase in the RGS5−/−ApoE−/− mice relative to the ApoE−/− controls (Figure 3A). Immunostaining of the aortic root cross‐sections with ICAM–1‐specific antibodies revealed a similar increased expression of ICAM‐1 in the endothelial cell layer of RGS5−/−ApoE−/− mice compared with ApoE−/− littermates (Figure 3B). Similar approaches were used to analyse the expression of VCAM‐1 in the endothelial cells of the atherosclerotic lesions. Compared with ApoE−/−mice, a moderate increase of VCAM‐1 expression in the endothelial cell layer was observed in RGS5−/−ApoE−/− mice, whereas this increase was much more significant in the lesion areas of RGS5−/−ApoE−/− mice (Figure 3C). Additionally, the mRNA levels of pro‐inflammatory markers, IL‐6, IL‐1β and TNF‐α were increased in the atherosclerotic lesions of RGS5−/−ApoE−/− mice compared with ApoE−/− mice, whereas the anti‐inflammatory IL‐10 showed the opposite result (Figure 3A). Further, immunofluorescence staining analysis of IL‐6 and IL‐10 in the lesions from RGS5−/−ApoE−/− mice exhibited results consistent with their mRNA level (Figure 3D). Given that NF‐κB plays a pivotal role in the inflammation that contributes to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, the expression of NF‐κB P65 subunit was further measured. As shown in Figure 3D, consistent with the presence of these elevated inflammatory mediators, increased nuclear translocation of the P65 was observed in lesions from RGS5−/−ApoE−/− mice, compared with that in ApoE−/− controls.
Figure 3.

Deletion of RGS5 enhances the expression of adhesion molecules and the inflammatory response. (A) Real‐time PCR assays were performed to determine the RNA levels of two adhesion molecules, ICAM‐1 and VCAM‐1, and several general inflammatory mediators. The expression of these transcripts was quantified as relative mRNA expression after normalization to GAPDH expression. **P < 0.01,*P < 0.05 compared with ApoE −/−. (B, C) Immunofluorescent co‐staining of atherosclerotic plaques with ICAM‐1 (red) or VCAM‐1 (red) and CD31 (endothelium, green). Representative images are shown (×20 magnification). Scale bar = 200 μm. (D) (Left panel) Representative images showing immunofluorescence staining of cross‐sections of the aortic sinus for P‐p65, IL‐6 and IL‐10. (right panel) Quantification of relative fluorescence intensity. Scale bar = 200 μm. **P < 0.01,*P < 0.05 compared with ApoE −/−.
RGS5 deletion promotes apoptosis of endothelial cells and macrophages
Apoptosis of endothelial cells facilitates the extravasation of monocytes and leads to the development of atherosclerosis. As shown in the representative images and the quantitative data, the number of TUNEL‐positive endothelial cells was increased (by 70%) in RGS5−/−ApoE−/− mice, compared with ApoE−/− littermates (Figure 4A). Macrophage apoptosis plays an important role in atherosclerotic plaque development (Tabas, 2010). We observed an increase in the percentage of TUNEL, and CD68‐positive macrophages in atherosclerotic lesions in RGS5−/−ApoE−/− mice compared with ApoE−/− mice (Figure 4B). Meanwhile, immunofluorescent co‐staining with cleaved‐caspase 3 and TUNEL, displayed an increase in the percentage of caspase 3/TUNEL‐positive cells in the atherosclerotic plaque of RGS5−/−ApoE−/− mice, compared with that in ApoE−/− mice (Figure 4C).
Figure 4.

Increased apoptosis of endothelial cells and macrophages in the absence of RGS5. Apoptotic cells in the lesion area were detected by TUNEL staining, endothelial cells (A) by CD31 staining, and macrophages (B) by CD68 staining. Representative images are shown (X20 magnification) and quantitative data are shown to the right. Scale bar = 200 μm. *P < 0.05 compared with ApoE −/− (C) Immunofluorescent costaining with cleaved‐caspase 3 (red) and TUNEL (green) of the aortic sinus. Scale bar = 200 μm. **P < 0.01 compared with ApoE −/−.
Enhanced instability of atherosclerotic plaques in the absence of RGS5
To further explore the effects of RGS5 deficiency on the stability of atherosclerotic plaques, other properties of plaque composition contributing to plaque instability were investigated, including decreased collagen content and SMC content covering the fibrous cap, increased macrophage numbers and increased lipid accumulation. First, the percentage of collagen in RGS5−/−ApoE−/− mice showed a 37% reduction relative to the ApoE−/− littermates (Figure 5A and E). Second, the SMC content of the atherosclerotic lesions showed a coordinated effect with a significant decrease of 48% in RGS5−/−ApoE−/− mice, compared with the controls (Figure 5B and E). Third, the macrophage infiltration that contributes to the formation of foam cells critical for atherogenesis was increased by 28% within lesions from RGS5−/−ApoE−/− mice, compared with the ApoE−/− mice (Figure 5C and E). Finally, lipid area staining with Oil Red O revealed a robust 39% increase in lipid accumulation in the lesions from RGS5−/−ApoE−/− mice, compared with ApoE−/− controls. Furthermore, we scored plaque stability, as described earlier, and the results showed an almost 50% decrease in RGS5−/−ApoE−/− mice (Figure 5F). This evidence indicates that RGS5 plays a protective role in advanced atherosclerotic lesions by enhancing several aspects of atherosclerotic plaque stability at the aortic root.
Figure 5.

Plaques from RGS5−/− ApoE −/− mice were less stable. Cross‐sections of the aortic sinus plaques were stained with Picrosirius Red for collagen (A), smooth muscle actin for SMCs (B), CD68 for macrophages (C), and Oil Red O for lipid (D). Scale bar = 200 μm. (E) Plaques from RGS5−/− ApoE −/− mice exhibited decreased percentages of collagen and SMCs and increased percentages of macrophages (MAC) and increased lipid area compared with those from ApoE −/− mice. **P < 0.01,*P < 0.05 compared with ApoE −/−. (F) The plaque stability score of RGS5−/− ApoE −/− mice was 70% lower than that of ApoE −/− mice. *P < 0.05 compared with ApoE −/−.
Loss of RGS5 activated the NF‐κB and MEK‐ERK1/2 signalling pathways
To identify the potential molecular mechanisms through which RGS5 slowed the development of atherosclerosis, we examined the state of activation of the NF‐κB and MEK‐ERK1/2 signalling pathways. Markedly increased expression of phosphorylated ERK1/2 was observed by co‐staining with CD31 in RGS5−/−ApoE−/− mice, compared with ApoE−/− controls (Figure 6A). Further analysis of the phosphorylated levels of MEK1/2, ERK1/2, P38, JNK1/2, and p65 was carried out by Western blotting. Although levels of p65 and MEK‐ERK1/2 phosphorylation were increased in RGS5−/−ApoE−/− mice, there was no statistically significant difference in p38 and JNK1/2 between the two groups (Figure 6B). To further confirm the involvement of these molecular changes, peritoneal macrophages were isolated from RGS5−/−ApoE−/− mice; these cells showed no detectable levels of RGS5 by Western blot (Figure 6C). Peritoneal macrophages were similarly isolated from ApoE−/− littermates. The expression of phosphorylated ERK1/2, and NF‐kB, as well as markers of apoptosis were measured after treatment of both sets of macrophages with oxidized LDL for 24 h. There was a marked increase in the levels of phosphorylated ERK1/2, phospho‐p65, IκBα, and cleaved‐caspase 3 in the macrophages from RGS5−/−ApoE−/− mice, compared with those from ApoE−/− controls (Figure 6C). These results suggest that RGS5 inhibited atherosclerosis, at least partly, by inhibiting MEK‐ERK1/2 and NF‐κB signalling.
Figure 6.

Effect of RGS5 on the MEK‐ERK1/2 and NF‐κB signalling pathways. (A) Immunofluorescent co‐staining of atherosclerotic plaque with phosphorylated ERK1/2 (red) and CD31 (endothelium, green). Representative images are shown (×20 magnification). Scale bar = 200 μm. (B) Representative p65, MEK, ERK1/2, p38, and JNK phosphorylation and their total protein expression in RGS5−/− ApoE −/− mice and ApoE −/− controls. The expression of these proteins was quantified as relative expression after normalization to GAPDH expression. **P < 0.01 compared with ApoE −/−. (C) Representative RGS5, p65, IκBα, ERK1/2 phosphorylation, and cleaved‐caspase 3 and their total protein expression in peritoneal macrophages from RGS5−/− ApoE −/− mice and ApoE −/− littermates. The expression of these proteins was quantified as relative expression after normalization to GAPDH expression. **P < 0.01 compared with ApoE −/−.
Discussion
In the present study, we assessed a novel role for RGS5 in endothelial cells from atherosclerotic lesions. RGS5 deficiency not only accelerated development of atherosclerosis, but also decreased the stability of atherosclerotic plaques. A mechanistic analysis suggested that this effect of RGS5 on atherosclerosis could derive, in part, from its regulatory effects on NF‐κB and MEK‐ERK1/2 signalling pathways.
Endothelial dysfunction, including enhanced permeability and pro‐inflammatory changes, is associated with endothelial cell apoptosis and deteriorating endothelial function to induce vascular pathogenesis and is recognized as the key outcome in the early inflammatory response to the oxidative modification of LDLs in the process of atherosclerosis (Harrison, 1997; Glass and Witztum, 2001). Here, we first demonstrated that RGS5 was down‐regulated in the endothelial cell layer of atheromatous plaques, and that it promoted the apoptosis of endothelial cells. Analysis of the aortic root showed that ICAM‐1 and VCAM‐1 were dramatically up‐regulated and abundantly expressed in different locations in the advanced stages of the disease process in RGS5−/−ApoE−/− mice, as suggested by a previous study (Iiyama et al., 1999). Therefore, a possible explanation for the accelerated plaque development in RGS5−/− mice may be an intrinsic activation of endothelial cells. As already known, concomitant with increased proinflammatory cell adhesion molecules, VCAM‐1 and ICAM‐1, which were secreted by the activation of endothelial cells, the infiltration of macrophages originating from monocytes is markedly increased and plays a causal role in the severity of atherogenesis (Ley et al., 2007; Mestas and Ley, 2008; Glass and Witztum, 2001). In our study, apart from the increased numbers of infiltrating macrophages, we also detected enhanced pro‐inflammatory gene expression (IL‐6, TNFα and IL‐1β), which can be expressed in macrophages along with highly activated NF‐κB signalling (Brand et al., 1996). The results we obtained are consistent with a previous study that showed that endothelial cell‐specific inhibition of NF‐κB protected mice from atherosclerosis through various mechanisms, including reduced expression of proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines and adhesion molecules, and by interfering with the recruitment of monocytes into atherosclerotic plaques (Gareus et al., 2008). During the past decade, activation of NF‐κB has been identified in SMCs, macrophages and the endothelial cells of atherosclerotic lesions, and this activation played a crucial role in the regulation of inflammatory mediator expression (De Martin et al., 2000). Against this background, our results would suggest that RGS5 deficiency in endothelial cells determines the severity of atherosclerosis, by increasing inflammation through activation of the NF‐κB signalling pathway. Further research is required to determine whether RGS5 has a similar effect on the inflammatory responses in macrophages.
Interestingly, we also observed markedly decreased expression of IL‐10. Thre is considerable circumstantial evidence for the anti‐inflammatory properties of IL‐10 in atherosclerosis in vivo. For example, the electrotransfer of IL‐10 cDNA significantly decreased endothelial NF‐κB activation and the expression of VCAM‐1 and ICAM‐1 (Potteaux et al., 2006), and IL‐10 deletion aggravated atherosclerosis (Mallat et al., 1999). Therefore, our observation of decreased expression of IL‐10 could, at least in part, contribute to the development of atherosclerosis.
Enhanced vessel wall permeability results from the apoptosis of vascular endothelial cells and facilitates the infiltration of cytokines, growth factors, lipids and immune cells, which increase the pro‐coagulatory activity of endothelial cells and induce rupture of atherosclerotic plaques (Choy et al., 2001). We found that apoptosis of macrophages and endothelial cells was increased in RGS5−/−ApoE−/− mice. However, the relationship between macrophage apoptosis and atherogenesis is complex and requires further investigation (Tabas, 2005). Based on the examination and quantification of the lesions from the cross‐section of the aortic sinus stained with H&E, we noticed that the total necrotic areas covered with fibrotic caps were almost 1.6‐fold larger in RGS5−/−ApoE−/− mice, relative to ApoE−/− controls. A previous study has documented that necrotic cores arise from apoptotic macrophages in advanced atherosclerotic lesions, where accumulation is more abundant than in early atherosclerotic lesions because of defective phagocytic clearance (Tabas, 2010). In human atherosclerotic‐induced cardiovascular disease, plaque morphology is a more important predictor of plaque disruption and acute clinical events than plaque size and the size of the necrotic core, in particular, plays a major determining role in plaque vulnerability (Brown et al., 1993). Other features, such as thinning of the fibrous cap, a high level of inflammatory cytokines, significant accumulation of lipids and apoptosis of intimal cells, also contribute to the vulnerability of atherosclerotic plaques (Kolodgie et al., 2004; Clarke and Bennett, 2006). In our model, we demonstrated that RGS5 deficiency induced apoptosis in macrophages and increased inflammatory gene expression. Further analysis of the atherosclerotic plaques, in RGS5−/−ApoE−/− mice, showed remarkably increased infiltration of macrophages accompanied by an accumulation of lipids and a decrease in the percentage of SMC and collagen. Advanced necrotic cores and other features of deterioration in vulnerable plaques are responsible for acute atherothrombotic clinical events. However, the mouse is not a good model for plaque disruption and acute atherothrombosis (Rosenfeld et al., 2002; Virmani et al., 2002). Nevertheless, our results still demonstrate a possible treatment option of targeting RGS5 in atherogenesis, particularly for maintaining plaque stability.
Although the present study has provided considerable evidence that RGS5 plays an important functional role in atherosclerosis, the mechanism by which RGS5 mediated its anti‐atherosclerosis effects remains unclear. In an earlier study, RGS5 deletion increased dyslipidaemia, obesity, adipose tissue deposition, hepatic steatosis and circulating inflammation through JNK and NF‐kB signalling pathways (Deng et al., 2012). However, in our study, we found there were no significant differences in the levels of body weight, glucose, triglycerides, total cholesterol, high‐density lipoprotein and LDL between the two groups of mice.
RGS5 also protected against cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis by inhibiting MEK‐ERK1/2 signalling (Li et al., 2010) and MAPK signalling pathways play a key role in the progress of cardiac hypertrophy (Molkentin, 2004; Lu et al., 2013; Li et al., 2014). Additionally, the majority of the many MAPK pathways expressed in mammals, along with the NF‐κB pathway, respond to inflammatory stimuli and a wide variety of other stimuli, including growth factors, GPCRs and environmental stresses such as oxidative stress and endoplasmic reticulum stress (Kyriakis and Avruch, 2001; 2012). The MAPK family consists of three major cascades, ERK, p38 and JNK. The JNK and p38 signalling pathways are activated by proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF‐α and by IL‐1β stimulation of endothelial cells or in response to cellular stresses such as genotoxic, osmotic, hypoxic or oxidative stress (Surapisitchat et al., 2001). By contrast, ERKs can be activated in a manner independent of Ras by proinflammatory stimuli, including cytokines of the TNF family and endogenously produced danger signals such as oxidised LDL in atherosclerosis and crystalline uric acid in gout (Kyriakis and Avruch, 2012). Increased ERK1/2 phosphorylation in HUVECs and atherosclerotic plaques was a consequence of silencing RGS5 expression (Anger et al., 2008). Therefore, we examined the status of the MAPK signalling pathway in the absence of RGS5 expression in our atherosclerosis models. First, in vivo, we found increased activation of phosphorylated MEK and ERK1/2 protein expression in RGS5−/−ApoE−/− mice, whereas the phosphorylation of p38 and JNK1/2 was not affected. Consistent with these results, levels of phosphorylated ERK1/2, P‐p65and P‐IκBα, as well as the apoptotic marker, cleaved‐caspase 3 were increased in vitro. Furthermore, phosphorylated ERK co‐staining with CD31 was predominant in the endothelial cell layer of both groups and was more abundant in RGS5−/−ApoE−/− mice, whereas there was minimal co‐expression in the lesion area. Overall, the NF‐κB and MEK‐ERK1/2 signalling pathways appear to be critical components of the response to RGS5 deletion in atherosclerosis.
In conclusion, we have shown that RGS5 deletion, associated with endothelial cells, accelerated high‐fat diet‐induced atherogenesis and plaque instability by contributing to endothelial dysfunction and enhanced vascular inflammation through the activation of the NF‐κB and MEK‐ERK1/2 signalling pathways. Given that acute clinical cardiovascular events occur at sites of atherosclerosis because the rupture of atherosclerotic plaques is not prevented, our work highlights the important role of RGS5 as a pharmacological therapeutic target in this clinical situation. Further clinical investigation is needed to determine whether increased RGS5 levels constitute an effective treatment for underlying atherosclerosis in patients with CHD or whether RGS5 is a potential target for the prevention of atherogenesis and the stabilization of atherosclerotic plaques.
Author contributions
W.‐L. C. and P.‐X. W. designed and conducted in vivo experiments, analysed the data and drafted the paper. T. W. and C. D performed the establishment of animal model and the collection of experimental tissues. W.‐L. C. and Y. Z. performed the pathological study and analysed the data. Y. J. and H. L. designed all of the experiments, supervised and funded the study, and contributed to the data analysis and to the writing of the paper.
Conflict of interest
None.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81100230, 81070089, 81200071, 81270306 and 81370365), National Science and Technology Support Project (Nos. 2011BAI15B02, 2012BAI39B05 and 2013YQ030923‐05), the National Basic Research Program of China (Nos. 2011CB503902 and 2011CB503903), the Key Project of the National Natural Science Foundation (Nos. 81330005, 81330004), the Collaborative Innovation Center for Cardiovascular Disease Translational Medicine and the PAPD.
Yong Ji and Hongliang Li contribute equally.
References
- Adams LD, Geary RL, McManus B, Schwartz SM (2000). A comparison of aorta and vena cava medial message expression by cDNA array analysis identifies a set of 68 consistently differentially expressed genes, all in aortic media. Circ Res 87: 623–631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alexander SPH, Benson HE, Faccenda E, Pawson AJ, Sharman JL Spedding M et al (2013). The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2013/14: Enzymes. Br J Pharmacol, 170: 1797–1867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anger T, Grebe N, Osinski D, Stelzer N, Carson W, Daniel WG et al (2008). Role of endogenous RGS proteins on endothelial ERK 1/2 activation. Exp Mol Pathol 85: 165–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bondjers C, Kalen M, Hellstrom M, Scheidl SJ, Abramsson A, Renner O et al (2003). Transcription profiling of platelet‐derived growth factor‐B‐deficient mouse embryos identifies RGS5 as a novel marker for pericytes and vascular smooth muscle cells. Am J Pathol 162: 721–729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brand K, Page S, Rogler G, Bartsch A, Brandl R, Knuechel R et al (1996). Activated transcription factor nuclear factor‐kappa B is present in the atherosclerotic lesion. J Clin Invest 97: 1715–1722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brown BG, Zhao XQ, Sacco DE, Albers JJ (1993). Atherosclerosis regression, plaque disruption, and cardiovascular events: a rationale for lipid lowering in coronary artery disease. Annu Rev Med 44: 365–376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cho H, Kozasa T, Bondjers C, Betsholtz C, Kehrl JH (2003). Pericyte‐specific expression of Rgs5: implications for PDGF and EDG receptor signaling during vascular maturation. FASEB J 17: 440–442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Choy JC, Granville DJ, Hunt DW, McManus BM (2001). Endothelial cell apoptosis: biochemical characteristics and potential implications for atherosclerosis. J Mol Cell Cardiol 33: 1673–1690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clarke M, Bennett M (2006). The emerging role of vascular smooth muscle cell apoptosis in atherosclerosis and plaque stability. Am J Nephrol 26: 531–535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Martin R, Hoeth M, Hofer‐Warbinek R, Schmid JA (2000). The transcription factor NF‐kappa B and the regulation of vascular cell function. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 20: E83–E88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deng W, Wang X, Xiao J, Chen K, Zhou H, Shen D et al (2012). Loss of regulator of G protein signaling 5 exacerbates obesity, hepatic steatosis, inflammation and insulin resistance. PLoS ONE 7: e30256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Furuya M, Nishiyama M, Kimura S, Suyama T, Naya Y, Ito H et al (2004). Expression of regulator of G protein signalling protein 5 (RGS5) in the tumour vasculature of human renal cell carcinoma. J Pathol 203: 551–558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gareus R, Kotsaki E, Xanthoulea S, van der Made I, Gijbels MJ, Kardakaris R et al (2008). Endothelial cell‐specific NF‐kappaB inhibition protects mice from atherosclerosis. Cell Metab 8: 372–383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glass CK, Witztum JL (2001). Atherosclerosis. The road ahead. Cell 104: 503–516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gu S, Cifelli C, Wang S, Heximer SP (2009). RGS proteins: identifying new GAPs in the understanding of blood pressure regulation and cardiovascular function. Clin Sci (Lond) 116: 391–399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hamzah J, Jugold M, Kiessling F, Rigby P, Manzur M, Marti HH et al (2008). Vascular normalization in Rgs5‐deficient tumours promotes immune destruction. Nature 453: 410–414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harrison DG (1997). Cellular and molecular mechanisms of endothelial cell dysfunction. J Clin Invest 100: 2153–2157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hollinger S, Hepler JR (2002). Cellular regulation of RGS proteins: modulators and integrators of G protein signaling. Pharmacol Rev 54: 527–559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Iiyama K, Hajra L, Iiyama M, Li H, DiChiara M, Medoff BD et al (1999). Patterns of vascular cell adhesion molecule‐1 and intercellular adhesion molecule‐1 expression in rabbit and mouse atherosclerotic lesions and at sites predisposed to lesion formation. Circ Res 85: 199–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang DS, Wei X, Zhang XF, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Chen K et al (2014). IRF8 suppresses pathological cardiac remodelling by inhibiting calcineurin signalling. Nat Commun 5: 3303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jin Y, An X, Ye Z, Cully B, Wu J, Li J (2009). RGS5, a hypoxia‐inducible apoptotic stimulator in endothelial cells. J Biol Chem 284: 23436–23443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kilkenny C, Browne W, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG (2010). Animal research: reporting in vivo experiments: the ARRIVE guidelines. Br J Pharmacol 160: 1577–1579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirsch T, Wellner M, Luft FC, Haller H, Lippoldt A (2001). Altered gene expression in cerebral capillaries of stroke‐prone spontaneously hypertensive rats. Brain Res 910: 106–115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kolodgie FD, Virmani R, Burke AP, Farb A, Weber DK, Kutys R et al (2004). Pathologic assessment of the vulnerable human coronary plaque. Heart 90: 1385–1391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kyriakis JM, Avruch J (2001). Mammalian mitogen‐activated protein kinase signal transduction pathways activated by stress and inflammation. Physiol Rev 81: 807–869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kyriakis JM, Avruch J (2012). Mammalian MAPK signal transduction pathways activated by stress and inflammation: a 10‐year update. Physiol Rev 92: 689–737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ley K, Laudanna C, Cybulsky MI, Nourshargh S (2007). Getting to the site of inflammation: the leukocyte adhesion cascade updated. Nat Rev Immunol 7: 678–689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li H, He C, Feng J, Zhang Y, Tang Q, Bian Z et al (2010). Regulator of G protein signaling 5 protects against cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis during biomechanical stress of pressure overload. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 13818–13823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li L, Chen W, Zhu Y, Wang X, Jiang DS, Huang F et al (2014). Caspase Recruitment domain 6 protects against cardiac hypertrophy in response to pressure overload. Hypertension 64: 94–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Libby P (2002). Inflammation in atherosclerosis. Nature 420: 868–874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lloyd‐Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, Carnethon M, Dai S, De Simone G et al (2010). Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics – 2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 121: 948–954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu J, Bian ZY, Zhang R, Zhang Y, Liu C, Yan L et al (2013). Interferon regulatory factor 3 is a negative regulator of pathological cardiac hypertrophy. Basic Res Cardiol 108: 326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mallat Z, Besnard S, Duriez M, Deleuze V, Emmanuel F, Bureau MF et al (1999). Protective role of interleukin‐10 in atherosclerosis. Circ Res 85: e17–e24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McGrath J, Drummond G, McLachlan E, Kilkenny C, Wainwright C (2010). Guidelines for reporting experiments involving animals: the ARRIVE guidelines. Br J Pharmacol 160: 1573–1576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mestas J, Ley K (2008). Monocyte‐endothelial cell interactions in the development of atherosclerosis. Trends Cardiovasc Med 18: 228–232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Molkentin JD (2004). Calcineurin‐NFAT signaling regulates the cardiac hypertrophic response in coordination with the MAPKs. Cardiovasc Res 63: 467–475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pawson AJ, Sharman JL, Benson HE, Faccenda E, Alexander SP, Buneman OP et al; NC‐IUPHAR (2014). The IUPHAR/BPS Guide to PHARMACOLOGY: an expert‐driven knowledge base of drug targets and their ligands. Nucl. Acids Res. 42 (Database Issue): D1098–D1106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Potteaux S, Deleuze V, Merval R, Bureau MF, Esposito B, Scherman D et al (2006). In vivo electrotransfer of interleukin‐10 cDNA prevents endothelial upregulation of activated NF‐kappaB and adhesion molecules following an atherogenic diet. Eur Cytokine Netw 17: 13–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosenfeld ME, Carson KG, Johnson JL, Williams H, Jackson CL, Schwartz SM (2002). Animal models of spontaneous plaque rupture: the holy grail of experimental atherosclerosis research. Curr Atheroscler Rep 4: 238–242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ross R (1999). Atherosclerosis – an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med 340: 115–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stary HC, Chandler AB, Dinsmore RE, Fuster V, Glagov S, Insull W Jr et al (1995). A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 15: 1512–1531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Surapisitchat J, Hoefen RJ, Pi X, Yoshizumi M, Yan C, Berk BC (2001). Fluid shear stress inhibits TNF‐alpha activation of JNK but not ERK1/2 or p38 in human umbilical vein endothelial cells: inhibitory crosstalk among MAPK family members. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 6476–6481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tabas I (2005). Consequences and therapeutic implications of macrophage apoptosis in atherosclerosis: the importance of lesion stage and phagocytic efficiency. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 25: 2255–2264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tabas I (2010). Macrophage death and defective inflammation resolution in atherosclerosis. Nat Rev Immunol 10: 36–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Virmani R, Burke AP, Kolodgie FD, Farb A (2002). Vulnerable plaque: the pathology of unstable coronary lesions. J Interv Cardiol 15: 439–446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
