Abstract
Mucosal vaccination is an effective strategy for generating antigen-specific immune responses against mucosal infections of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV). In this study, Lactobacillus plantarum strains NC8 and WCFS1 were used as oral delivery vehicles containing a pSIP411-VP1 recombinant plasmid to initiate mucosal and systemic immune responses in guinea pigs. Guinea pigs were orally vaccinated (three doses) with NC8-pSIP411, NC8-pSIP411-VP1, WCFS1-pSIP411, WCFS1-pSIP411-VP1 or milk. Animals immunized with NC8-pSIP411-VP1 and WCFS1-pSIP411-VP1 developed high levels of antigen-specific serum IgG, IgA, IgM, mucosal secretory IgA (sIgA) and neutralizing antibodies, and revealed stronger cell-mediated immune responses and enhanced protection against FMDV challenge compared with control groups. The recombinant pSIP411-VP1 effectively improved immunoprotection against FMDV in guinea pigs.
Introduction
Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is a highly contagious disease of livestock. Outbreaks of FMD cause severe financial losses [1], and often lead to quarantining and export limitations in affected countries, as well as culling of herds. After a 2–12 day incubation period, affected animals develop acute onset of high fever, which is followed by vesicle formation in the mouth, pharynx and on the feet. Affected animals suffer pain, refuse their feed, and salivate extensively. The causal pathogen, FMDV, belongs to the genus Aphthovirus of the family Picornaviridae and includes seven serotypes, A, O, C, Asia 1, SAT1, SAT2 and SAT3. The virion has a high potential for genetic and antigenic variation. Cross-protective antibodies are not formed after infection or vaccination by other serotypes and subtypes of FMDV. This has confounded the efforts of vaccination programs for preventing the disease [2]. The viral genome is a positive single-stranded RNA, with a protein coat consisting of four capsid proteins enumerated as VP1, VP2, VP3, and VP4. Currently available parenteral vaccines employed to control FMD are inactivated and contain the whole virus in a semi-purified state, especially the VP1 structural polypeptide, forming the virion as the immunological component, which shows the promising protection for animals against FMD [3].
Mucosal vaccines have been found to induce sufficient mucosal responses to prevent the virus from establishing the mucosa as a site of continued replication and dissemination [4]. Mucosal immunization can induce both antigen-specific mucosal sIgA antibodies and systemic IgG antibodies, and as a result mucosal vaccines could be used in much the same way as currently available licensed parenteral vaccines [5].
Lactobacillus plantarum is a lactic acid bacterium (LAB) present in many ecological niches including naturally fermented food and decaying plant materials. It holds Generally Regarded As Safe (GRAS) status. L. plantarum is a normal inhabitant of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract in humans and mice, and recent genome-wide gene expression studies have identified adaptations that the bacteria use to survive in the harsh condition of the GI-tract [6–8]. It is considered a probiotic, and its high survival rate within GI-tract makes this bacterium a promising candidate for acceptability as a vehicle for in situ delivery of therapeutically interesting proteins [9–11]. Promising results have been achieved in inducing L. plantarum to secrete selected biomolecules, and by anchoring antigens to the cell [12,13]. Prior work has confirmed the potential of live recombinant Lactobacillus to deliver antigens to the immune system [4,14], suggesting the feasibility of using lactobacilli in effective oral vaccines.
FMDV invades animals primarily through mucosal surfaces, and the infection can be prevented by mucosal immune responses, suggesting that vaccines designed to elicit mucosal FMDV-specific immunity at major mucosal surfaces might interfere with viral transmission [15]. Although parenteral vaccination is usually efficient in inducing protective immune responses, the parenteral routes generally fail to activate mucosal immune responses and cannot effectively prevent the pathogens from entering the body via mucosae [15]. The creation of L. plantarum vaccines could result in halted virus transmission, and induce both mucosal immunity and systemic immunity. In this study, two recombinant L. plantarum strains—NC8 and WCFS1—were constructed to express a synthetic VP1 gene of FMDV A virus. We sought to evaluate the immunological and clinical impact of plasmids encoding FMDV-VP1 capsid protein using L. plantarum as mucosal adjuvant via oral vaccination in a guinea pig model.
Materials and Methods
Animal use
Female Hartley guinea pigs were obtained from Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute (China). Female guinea pigs weighing 250 to 300g, with no maternal antibodies to FMDV, were maintained under pathogen-free conditions with free access to pathogen-free food and water. The daily food and vegetables, such as Chinese cabbage and carrots, can satisfy the nutrient demand of animals. The cage measures 100cm×60cm×30cm and is suitable for 3 guinea pigs (total 30 guinea pigs in 10 cages). They were kept in a clean, quiet room with appropriate temperature, humidity and light. The health of the guinea pigs was monitored twice daily after FMDV challenge. All guinea pig experiments were performed in a bio-safety level 3 animal facilities of State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology following the protocol approved by Gansu Provincial Science and Technology Department. Experiments conformed to the local (Regulations for the administration of affairs concerning experimental animals) and international (Dolan K. 2007 Second Edition of Laboratory Animal Law. Blackwell, UK) guidelines on the ethical use of animals. Guinea pigs were anesthetized by exposure to 4% isoflurane for 3 minutes prior to blood collection, saliva collection and FMDV challenge. Guinea pigs meeting criteria for euthanasia (<25% weight loss compared to weight on day of challenge), were exposed to 5% isoflurane for 60 minutes rendering animals dead or completely non-responsive followed by cervical dislocation. All surviving guinea pigs were humanely euthanized at the end of this study.
Bacterium, plasmid, virus, and cell line
The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1 and the strains are plasmid-free. The E.coli strains were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth at 37°C in shaking flasks, and the Lactobacillus strains, NC8 and WCFS1, were cultured in Man-Rogosa-Sharpe (MRS) medium at 30°C or 37°C without shaking. Solid media were prepared by adding 1.5% (w/v) agar to the broth. When appropriate, antibiotics were added as follows: ampicillin– 200 μg/mL (E. coli); erythromycin– 200 μg/mL (E. coli) and 5 μg/mL (Lactobacillus).
Table 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids.
Plasmids or bacterial strains | Relevant characteristics | Source or reference |
---|---|---|
pUC57 | Vector harboring synthetic VP1 gene; Apr | This work |
pSIP411 | Expression vector; Emr | [16] |
E.coli DH5ɑ | Cloning strains | Takara |
L. plantarum NC8 (NC8 CCUG 61730) | Host strain; plasmid-free | [17] |
L. plantarum WCFS1 | Host strain; plasmid-free | [18] |
L. plantarum WCFS1 is a single colony isolate of strain NCIMB8826. Apr and Emr indicate ampicillin and erythromycin resistant gene, respectively.
A DNA fragment encoding one peptide, VP1 gene, was isolated from serotype-A FMDV (the strain was maintained and available in the Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute (LVRI), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS)), an epidemic virulent strain originating from an outbreak in Maoming, China, during 2013, by PCR amplification according to the manufacturer’s protocols using high-fidelity Ex Taq DNA polymerse (TaKaRa Bio Inc. Japan). The following oligonucleotide primer pair was used to amplify VP1 sequence (Table 2): sense primer P1 5’- GAC ATG TCC TCC TGC ATC T -3’, antisense primer P2 5’- CAC AAA TGT ACA GGG ATG GGT -3’. The PCR products were sequenced by Shanghai Sunny Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) and chemically synthesized by GenScript Co. Ltd (Nanjing, China), which was codon optimized with L. plantarum (GenBank KR149262) and inserted into the vector pUC57 with the NcoI and XhoI restriction sites on VP1 gene’s 5’ and 3’ sides respectively. VP1 gene (647 bp) was digested out of pUC57-VP1 recombinant plasmid and inserted at corresponding sites into the plasmid pSIP411 (gift of Prof. Lars Axelsson, Nofima, Norway). Baby Hamster Syrian Kidney (BHK) cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Gibco) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco), 100 IU/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL at 37°C in 5% CO2 condition.
Table 2. Primers used for PCR amplification.
Oligonucleotides | Sequence (5’- 3’) | Target | Source |
---|---|---|---|
sense primer P1 | GAC ATG TCC TCC TGC ATC T | VP1 gene | This work |
antisense primer P2 | CAC AAA TGT ACA GGG ATG GGT | VP1 gene | This work |
sense primer P3 | GCC CAT GGA AAC AAC AGC AAC AG | synthetic VP1 gene | This work |
antisense primer P4 | GCT CGA GTT ATA ATA ATT GTT TCG CAG G | synthetic VP1 gene | This work |
(Restriction sites are underlined.)
Transformation and electro-transformation
Chemically competent E. coli DH5ɑ (Takara) was transformed applying the protocol provided by the manufacturer. Lactobacilli were electro-transformed according to the protocol of Aukrust et al. but with the following modifications [17]: (1) 2% instead of 1% glycine was used in the preparation of electro-competent lactobacilli, and (2) the cells were washed three times in wash buffer (0.5mM Na-phosphate, 0.1mM MgCl2, pH = 7.4), and resuspended in electroporation buffer (0.1M sucrose, 3mM MgCl2, pH = 7.4) and stored at -80°C. A stationary phase (12 h) culture of recipient Lactobacillus strains, NC8 and WCFS1, were inoculated (1/100 inoculum) (v/v) into 100 mL of MRS broth (containing 2% glycine) without antibiotics at 30°C without shaking. The cells were harvested at OD600 0.3 (about 3 h), put on the ice for 10 minutes, centrifuged at 2,000 r/min for 10 minutes at 4°C and washed two times with an equal culture volume of ice-cold wash buffer. Then the cells were resuspended in 1 mL ice-cold sucrose-magnesium chloride electroporation buffer (SMEB). 10 μL of recombination plasmid DNA was mixed with 200 μL of ice-cold competent cells in SMEB. The mixture was placed on ice for 5 minutes and then was transferred into a prechilled cuvette (inter-electrode distance 0.2 cm, Bio-Rad). A single electrical pulse was 2,500 V/cm, 2.5 μF and delivered via Gene PlusterTM (Bio-Rad). The suspension was immediately put on ice for 5 minutes and 900 μL of recovery medium was added (MRS broth without antibiotics containing 2% glycine). The bacteria were then incubated for 3 h at 30°C without agitation and at last the recombinant strains were selected on MRS agar medium containing 5 μg/mL erythromycin.
Protein expression and western blot analysis
For analysis of VP1 expressed by pSIP411 in NC8 and WCFS1, the recombinant strains were grown for 12 h in MRS broth containing 5 μg/mL erythromycin at 37°C without shaking. Then the overnight cultures were inoculated (1/100 inoculum) (v/v) in MRS medium and induced by adding SppIP to 100 ng/mL at OD600 0.3 (about 3 h). Cells were harvested at OD600 1.0 (about 7 h after induction) by centrifugation at 8,000 r/min at 4°C. The bacterial cells were washed three times with sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, PH = 7.4) at 4°C and resuspended in lysis buffer (50mM Tris-HCl, 400U mutanolysin/mL, 20mg lysozyme/mL, 50 mM glucose, and Roche complete protease inhibitors) at 37°C for 1h. The bacteria were centrifuged at 8,000 r/min for 15 minutes at 4°C, and then the pellets were resuspended for analysis via 12% Sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Protein extracts were electro-transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane for western blot analysis using swine anti-FMDV antibodies (prepared previously in our laboratory) at a dilution of 1:200 and horseradish-peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-swine IgG antibody (Abbkine, Inc., USA) at a dilution of 1: 2,000, which was visualized with chemiluminescent substrate reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Immunization procedures
Cells (NC8-pSIP411, NC8-pSIP411-VP1, WCFS1-pSIP411 or WCFS1-pSIP411-VP1) grown at 37°C in MRS medium containing 5 μg/mL of erythromycin, induced at OD600 0.3 and harvested at OD600 1.0, were washed in PBS and resuspended in milk. Five groups (n = 6) of clean guinea pigs were orally dosed with the Lactobacillus strains with a 1.0 mL syringe—vaccinated every 7 days with 200 μL (109 CFU (colony forming unit) in 200 μL of milk for three consecutive days (i.e., the animals were vaccinated on days 1~3, 11~13 and 21~ 23), using milk as control groups (Table 3).
Table 3. Immunization groups.
Groups | Number | Immunizing dose (109 CFU/mL) | Vaccines |
---|---|---|---|
A | 6 | 0.2 mL | NC8 (pSIP411-VP1) + milk |
B | 6 | 0.2 mL | NC8 (pSIP411) + milk |
C | 6 | 0.2 mL | WCFS1 (pSIP411-VP1)+ milk |
D | 6 | 0.2 mL | WCFS1 (pSIP411) + milk |
E | 6 | 0.2 mL | Only milk (control group) |
CFU: colony forming unit.
On days 0 (pre-immune), 10, 20 and 30, 500 μL of anticoagulated whole blood samples and 500 μL blood samples for serum tests were collected from whole blood of heart; 300 mg of fecal samples was obtained every 2 days in 300 μL sterile PBS (pH 7.4) containing 0.01 mol/L EDTA-Na2 and then incubated for 12 h at 4°C. Saliva samples were also collected every 2 days from the mouth of the guinea pigs using sterile rayon balls and soaked in the PBS with 1 mM protease inhibitor. Clear extracts of all samples were stored at -80°C for subsequent analysis.
Detection of antibodies using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
Specific IgG in serum was tested using an indirect ELISA. 96-well EIA/RIA microplates (Costar; Corning, Inc.) were coated for 12 h at 4°C with FMDV-A antigen. After three times washing with PBS + Tween 20 (0.1%) (PBST), the wells were blocked for 2 h at 37°C with PBST containing 5% skim milk to prevent nonspecific binding and then were washed three times. Serum (1:10 dilution) was reacted with the coated wells for 1 h at 37°C. After the plates were washed three times, HRP-conjugated goat anti-guinea pig IgG antibody, diluted 1:5,000, was used to detect the bound antibodies, and the plates were incubated for an additional 50 minutes at 37°C. After another three washes, colour development was carried out using o-phenylenediamine (OPD) as the substrate, and optical absorbance was measured at 492 nm within 15 minutes after adding the stop buffer. For the ELISA tests in this study, cut off values were defined as the mean OD plus 3×standard deviation (SD) of samples from 30 guinea pigs used in this study before immunization.
A Capture ELISA test was used for the detection of IgA and IgM in serum as well as sIgA in saliva and feces, according to the protocol of Satya et al. [19]. After 96-well microplates were coated for 12 h at room temperature (RT) with rabbit antiserum against FMDV (1:1,000 dilution) and washed three times with PBST, FMDV-A antigen (1:1,000 dilution) was added to each well and incubated for 1 h at 37°C. After a further wash step, test samples were added to the wells (serum 1:10 dilution, saliva 1:4 dilution and feces 1:2 dilution) and incubated for 1 h at 37°C. After the plates were washed three times, HRP-conjugated goat anti-guinea pig IgA/IgM antibody was used to detect bound antibodies, diluted 1:1,000, and incubated for additional 50 minutes at 37°C. After three times washes, colour development was carried out using OPD as the substrate, and optical absorbance was measured at 492 nm within 15 minutes after adding the stop buffer.
Detection of specific neutralizing antibodies against FMDV
Serum samples obtained from guinea pigs on day 30 were analyzed for neutralizing antibody titers using a neutralization assay with monolayers of BHK-21 cells [20]. 50 μL sera samples were added to each well by double ratio dilution method (from 1:2 to 1:512) with DMEM (Gibco) containing 2% FBS in a 96-well plate (before adding the sera samples, the serum was inactivated by incubating at 56°C in 30 minutes). Samples obtained from the guinea pigs immunized orally with the empty vector or milk were used as controls. 50 μL of FMDV, adjusted to 100 TCID50 by DMEM containing 2% FBS, was added to each cell of the plates containing serially diluted serum. The antibody and virus mixture were mixed and incubated at 37°C for 1 h. Then 100 μL of BHK cells (106 cells/mL) was added to the antibody-virus mixture and incubated with 5% CO2 at 37°C. After 5 days incubation, CPE was measured by microscopy and each sera dilution were counted when the negative sera control and the blank control had no CPE. After the supernatant medium was discarded, 50 μL stationary liquid (10% formaldehyde) were added to each well incubated for 30 minutes and then stained with 10% formaldehyde containing 0.05% methylene blue solution for another 30 min. Read-Muench method was used to calculate the neutralizing antibody titer. The neutralizing antibody titers were calculated as the log10 of the reciprocal of the final serum dilution that neutralized 100 TCID50 of virus in 50% of the wells.
T cell proliferation
Five guinea pigs from each immunization group (and controls) were dissected under aseptic condition, and single-lymphocyte suspensions were prepared from the spleen on day 30. Cells were labeled with carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) as described previously. CFSE-labeled cells were washed three times in PBS containing 3% FBS and then resuspended in Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 medium (RPMI-1640) plus 10% FBS, 15 mM HEPES and 0.05 mM ß-mercaptoethanol. 1 mL cell suspensions were added to each well of the 24-well plates at 1.0~2.0×106 cells/mL. The cells were stimulated with 10 μg/mL concanavalin A (con A) (positive control), 10 μg/mL inactivated FMDV antigens (specific antigen stimulation) and culture medium (negative control), respectively, each group containing three parallel wells, incubated with 5% CO2 at 37°C. After 60 h of incubation, the lymphocytes were collected and concentrated by centrifugation at 1,500 r/min for 10 minutes, and then washed three times in PBS and finally resuspended in 300 μL PBS. The data for T cell proliferation was acquired with a FACSAria flow cytometer (BD, USA).
Determination of T lymphocyte subsets
Blood samples on day 30 obtained with the anticoagulation agent EDTA were stained with R. Phycoerythrin (RPE)-conjugated mouse anti-guinea pig CD4 antibody and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) conjugated mouse anti-guinea pig CD8 antibody for 30 minutes at room temperature (RT), using blood samples with RPE and FITC conjugated mouse IgG1 antibodies as negative control and blood as blank control. Subsequently, FACS lysing solution (BD FACSTM) was added to each sample to lyse blood cells for 15 minutes at RT. The cell pellets were resuspended by PBS after three washes, and detected by a FACSAria flow cytometer.
Animal infections
Forty days after the first immunization, anesthetized guinea pigs were challenged subcutaneously and intradermally in the left rear leg with 0.2 mL 100ID50 of FMDV serotype-A. After 7 days of challenge, protection against FMDV was examined by clinical signs as follows: guinea pigs showing FMD-compatible lesions only at the original injection site were judged to be protected, and those showing any FMD clinical signs in the other three feet were judged to be unprotected [20].
Statistical analysis
Data handling and analysis and graphic representation were performed using GraphPad Prism 6.0 software (San Diego, CA). The data were analyzed to express the mean ±SD as the error value and one-tailed t test was used for comparison. Differences were considered to be statistically significant when P value was less than 0.05.
Results
Expression of VP1 by L. plantarum
Expression of VP1 protein by NC8 and WCFS1 cultured at OD600 1.0 in basal MRS medium was induced with the inducing peptide pheromone (SppIP). The cultures were centrifuged and subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting. Fig 1 presents the expression of VP1 in NC8 and WCFS1. Immunoreactive bands of approximately 24 kDa were detected in the cell fractions of NC8 containing recombinant plasmids and the immunoreactive protein band of WCFS1 containing recombinant plasmids was about 26 kDa, whereas there were no evident bands in the negative control lanes (without plasmids and containing pSIP411).
Antibodies responses
The mucosal immunity of guinea pigs was studied by measuring the anti-FMDV-VP1 IgA response in serum. Before oral immunization on day 0, there was no substantial difference in mucosal IgA levels between the experimental (NC8-pSIP411-VP1 and WCFS1-pSIP411-VP1) and control groups (NC8-pSIP411, WCFS1-pSIP411 and milk) (Fig 2(C)) (p>0.05). Seven days following the first immunization (day 10), anti-FMDV-VP1 IgA reached high levels in experimental groups, NC8-pSIP411-VP1 and WCFS1-pSIP411-VP1 (p<0.05), while there was no obvious increase of anti-FMDV-VP1 antibody in the control groups that received pSIP411 or milk (p>0.05). Similar results for anti-FMDV-VP1 sIgA antibody were obtained for fecal and salivary samples in the immunized guinea pigs (Fig 2(A) and 2(B)). After a second immunization (day 20), the concentration of serum IgA in the experimental groups, NC8-pSIP411-VP1 and WCFS1-pSIP411-VP1, appeared lower than the original level after the first immunization (p<0.05). When compared to the mucosal IgA levels, no significant anti-FMDV-VP1 antibodies were observed in the control groups (p>0.05). The concentrations of anti-FMDV-VP1-specific IgM from immunized guinea pigs were also determined (Fig 2(E)) (p<0.05). After the third immunization, IgM antibodies rose to the highest level in NC8-pSIP411-VP1 and WCFS1-pSIP411-VP1 groups (p<0.05). Although there was no increase in the negative milk control (p>0.05), there again was a modest signal in NC8-pSIP411 and WCFS1-pSIP411 immunized animals. The FMDV-specific systemic immune responses of guinea pigs were studied by measuring the anti-FMDV-VP1 IgG response in serum. As the results show (Fig 2(D)), there was no substantial difference in IgG levels between the experimental and control groups on day 0 (p>0.05). Seven days following the first immunization (day 10), anti-FMDV-VP1 IgG obtained high levels in experimental groups, NC8-pSIP411-VP1 and WCFS1-pSIP411-VP1 (p<0.05). The concentration of IgG in the experimental groups rose further after the second immunization (day 20) and reached the highest level after the third immunization (day 30) (p<0.05). No significant elicitation of anti-FMDV-VP1 IgG antibodies was observed in the milk negative control group (p>0.05). Slight increases in IgG were again noted in the NC8-pSIP411 and WCFS1-pSIP411 groups.
Taken together, these results indicate that orally administered NC8-pSIP411-VP1 and WCFS1-pSIP411-VP1 were able to elicit both FMDV-specific systemic and mucosal antibody responses. Moreover, the mucosal immune responses occurred earlier than systemic responses but also declined more rapidly.
Determination of T lymphocyte subsets
To investigate cellular immune responses after oral immunization with Lactobacillus strains incorporating the recombinant plasmid, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were assayed by flow cytometry in blood samples obtained after the third vaccination. As demonstrated in Fig 3 the CD4+ T cells and CD8+ cells in both NC8-pSIP411-VP1 and WCFS1-pSIP411-VP1 groups rose to a higher level than the control groups.
T cell proliferative responses
A single-cell suspension of lymphocytes was prepared from immunized guinea pigs on day 30. After 60 h cultivation, the suspensions were stimulated by concanavalin A as a positive control—resulting in evident proliferation, and by medium as a negative control—with anticipated dormancy evident. Both NC8-pSIP411-VP1 and WCFS1-pSIP411-VP1 groups produced significantly high levels of T cell proliferation when stimulated by activated FMDV as a specific antigen (Fig 4), while no obvious proliferation occurred in the control groups. These results indicate that these Lactobacillus strains expressing VP1 protein could induce antigen-specific T cell responses.
Neutralizing activity
The anti-viral neutralizing serum antibody titers of immunized guinea pigs were assessed (Fig 2(F)). Serum samples were obtained from vaccinated animals on day 30 after the first immunization. Antibody responses of guinea pigs orally immunized with NC8-pSIP411-VP1 or WCFS1-pSIP411-VP1 exhibited higher FMDV-neutralizing activity than the control groups’ responses, as shown by cytopathic effect (CPE) inhibition, indicating that NC8-pSIP411-VP1 and WCFS1-pSIP411-VP1 could induce neutralizing antibodies to FMDV.
Protective effect of oral vaccines in guinea pigs
The guinea pigs were challenged with 100 GPID50 (50% guinea pigs infectious dose) of homotypic virus on day 30 after the first immunization, and the protective effects of the oral vaccines were evaluated. During ten days continuous observation post-challenge, the percentages of animals in each group exhibiting clinical signs (fever, swollen soles, and secondary vesicles) are as follows: 1/5 in NC8-pSIP411-VP1 group, 3/5 in NC8-pSIP411 group, 0/5 in WCFS1-pSIP411-VP1 group, 2/5 in WCFS1-pSIP411 and 4/5 in milk group as shown in Table 4. NC8-pSIP411-VP1 and WCFS1-pSIP411-VP1 vaccination provided at least partial protection against FMDV.
Table 4. Protection of guinea pigs (n = 5) against FMDV challenge.
Group a | Vaccines | Protection | Primary vesicles | Second vesicles |
---|---|---|---|---|
A | NC8 (pSIP411-VP1) | 4/5 | 5/5 | 1/5 |
B | NC8 (pSIP411) | 2/5 | 5/5 | 3/5 |
C | WCFS1 (pSIP411-VP1) | 5/5 | 5/5 | 0/5 |
D | WCFS1 (pSIP411) | 3/5 | 5/5 | 2/5 |
E | Only milk | 1/5 | 5/5 | 4/5 |
Severe symptoms were based on daily monitoring until 7 days post challenge (one guinea pig of each group was chosen to determine the proliferation of spleen lymphocytes and the number of remaining animals in each group was 5).
a Guinea pigs were challenged on day 40. Animals showing FMD-compatible lesions only at the original injection site as primary vesicles were judged to be protected, and those showing any FMD clinical signs in the other three feet as second vesicles were judged to be unprotected.
Discussion
Although vaccines have been useful for controlling and even eradicating FMD from parts of the world since the early 1900s, the disease still infects millions of animals each year and remains the main sanitary barrier to the commerce of animals and animal products. Vaccination is the main prophylactic method of preventing FMDV infection. Many types of vaccines have been designed—almost entirely parenterally administered—including inactivated antigen vaccines, live attenuated vaccines, DNA vaccines, empty capsid vaccines and synthetic peptide vaccines [21]. Inactivated virus vaccines can elicit high levels of neutralizing antibodies and offer efficacious protection against homologous serotypes [22]. However, these vaccines have some shortcomings, including reversion to virulence, insufficient stability, and creation of viral carrier state. These vaccines cannot prevent the virus from entering the body via mucosa [15]. FMDV infection generally occurs at mucosal surfaces, which makes mucosal immunization with specific vaccine antigens an attractive option for protection against infection. Intranasal delivery of cationic PLGA nano/microparticles loaded with various FMDV DNA vaccine formulations encoding IL-6 as a molecular adjuvant enhanced protective immunity against infection by aerosolized FMDV [20]. Another study also suggested that intranasal delivery of Chi-PLGA-DNA nanoparticles with FMDV antigen resulted in high levels of mucosal, systemic and cell-mediated immunity and could reduce disease severity and virus excretion as well as delay clinical symptoms [23].
Many available approaches stimulate efficient mucosal responses, such as delivering protein or peptide antigens in association with appropriate adjuvants (e.g., liposomes and ISCOMs) [24,25], stimulating cellular or humoral immune responses in particulate form linked to latex microspheres [26] and using recombinant live vectors (e.g., attenuated virus or bacteria) [27–31]. Using lactobacilli as carriers to deliver exogenous vaccines antigens into the cytosol efficiently appears to be one of the most successful strategies [14,32]. WCFS1, the first genome annotated Lactobacillus strain, was found that it possessed the functionality of homologous signal peptides sequence [33]. NC8, isolated from grass silage, possessed unusual property of naturally plasmid free among L. plantarum strains [34]. These two L. plantarum can colonize the GI-tract, and are recognized as emerging candidates for the expression of recombinant proteins as well as for genetic and metabolic cell engineering [16], relevant to both medical and industrial biotechnology [35,36]. Oral administration of lactobacilli with recombinant proteins in situ has many advantages, such as safe, convenient, less stress among animals and reduction in adverse reaction [37,38]. Besides, lactobacilli as live vectors can persist longer in the GI-tract and some of them have intrinsic probiotic properties [39,40].
The gene used in this study, VP1 gene, has been the hot area of research in molecular biology of FMDV for years. VP1 protein exposed on the surface of viral particles is the main antigen of neutralizing antibody responses and plays an important part in forming the virus particles [41]. Over the past decades, the partial or complete VP1 coding sequence has been used in the development of engineering vaccines accommodating the large-scale production of recombinant protein, efficiently produced and expressed in various systems, such as E. coli, transgenic plants, yeasts, baculovirus and mammalian cells [19,42–46]. The sequence of VP1 gene was optimized based on the pool and codon used by L. plantarum, which reduced the GC content from 59.53% to 47.49% and without changing the gene expression, and improved the translational performance [47]. In this study, pSIP expression systems were used to express FMDV-VP1 protein. Studies are currently underway to employ lactic acid bacteria vectors to produce vaccines of many viral proteins, such as the hemagglutinin (HA) gene of H9N2 avian influenza virus, anti-rotavirus protein (Llama VHH antibody fragments), and bioactive porcine interferon-alpha [48–50]. Two L. plantarum strains were chosen in this study to carry the pSIP plasmids. Compared to the results of western blotting of these two strains, it was found that the molecular weight of target proteins expressed by WCFS1, was a little bigger than proteins expressed by NC8, on account of post-translational modification (such as phosphorylation and acetylation). Milk was used to resuspend strains in this study in order to improve taste for animals and make the oral administration safe and easy. In addition, we choose 37°C as induction temperature to imitate internal temperature of guinea pigs (the suitable temperature range of L. plantarum is 30–37°C).
In the respiratory tract, oral administration of recombinant L. plantarum can induce sIgA antibodies which are considered to be a major effector in the adaptive immune defense of the respiratory mucosa. IgA antibody emerges when antigens invade mucosa, (earlier than IgG antibody), indicating that IgA functions at the early stage of viral infection. This current study demonstrated that high levels of FMDV-specific IgA were produced in serum, saliva and feces, supporting the importance of IgA antibody responses in preventing the entry and replication of FMDV. However, the full mechanisms underlying the decrease in respiratory tract infections and other symptoms are still uncertain. The production of IgG antibody occurred later that IgA, but levels became higher and lasted longer than IgA. Taken together, the results suggested that mucosal responses induced by recombinant L. plantarum were interactive with systemic responses.
Our results are the first to report the immunization effects in guinea pigs using pSIP system with two L. plantarum host strains via oral immunization. The data we obtained clearly demonstrated that oral administration of VP1 proteins expressed by NC8 and WCFS1 could induce both mucosal responses and systemic responses and provide good protection against FMDV challenge. The mucosal administration of the vaccine strains resulted in a detectable FMDV-specific IgG and IgA responses. However, because of frequent mutations in VP1 gene region of field isolates, VP1 protein based immunization cannot produce an effective and stable immune response over a long period of time. Researches are seeking alternative genes which are carrying effective immuno-dominant epitopes and with less mutation. For example, VP2 of FMDV is believed to carry immuno-dominant epitopes, and publications revealed that VP2 protein shows important immunological characteristics in the development of FMDV vaccines [51]. Those studies are still in preliminary stage, and further studies in our laboratory will explore immune effects of other FMDV gene segments in combination immunologic adjuvants (for instance, IFN) expressed by LAB via mucosal routes in different animal models, especially in large animals.
In the past two decades, studies mucosally administered recombinant LAB (rLAB) using animal models have successfully demonstrated major health benefits, and the field has recently moved into the era of human clinical trials, which is enough to prove the potential of rLAB as therapeutic tools for their safe and efficient use. Despite good application prospect of rLAB as therapeutic delivery vehicles, there are still many questions remaining unanswered, such as the dose of therapeutic protein delivered in situ by the rLAB after oral administration, the more effective immunization route (the intranasal route or the oral route), the best period of life (neonate or adult)[52]. This study is in the early stages of the FMD oral vaccines and needs more tests to enhance the immune effect. Further studies will be carried on larger animals which are susceptible to FMDV, such as swine and bovine, and the studies are required to consider immune effect comparison of the intranasal immunization and the oral immunization, the coexpression of larger fragments and cytokines. Many experts anticipate that, in the next decade, more applications of rLAB as therapeutic tools will be developed and optimized because LAB delivery is now a true realistic option in both human and animal medicine [13,53,54]. In conclusion, the oral live carrier vaccine is a promising strategy for the presentation of FMDV antigen to provide an effective, inexpensive and stable alternative to current approaches of immunization for FMDV [55].
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Prof. Lars Axelsson, Nofima, Norway for providing plasmid pSIP411; Culture Collection, University of Gothenburg (CCUG), Sweden for providing L. plantarum NC8 strain; Prof. Michiel Kleerebezem, NIZO food research, the Netherlands for providing L. plantarum WCFS1 strain.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper.
Funding Statement
This study was financially supported by the Chinese “863” National Programs for High Technology Research and Development (Grant No.: 2011AA10A211), URL: http://www.most.gov.cn/eng/programmes1/200610/t20061009_36225.htm, the National Pig Industrial System (CARS-36-06B), the Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (201203039). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Perry BD, Rich KM. Poverty impacts of foot-and-mouth disease and the poverty reduction implications of its control. The Veterinary record. 2007;160(7):238–41. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Zhang Z, Pan L, Ding Y, Zhou P, Lv J, Chen H, et al. Efficacy of synthetic peptide candidate vaccines against serotype-A foot-and-mouth disease virus in cattle. Applied microbiology and biotechnology. 2015;99(3):1389–98. 10.1007/s00253-014-6129-1 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Farsang A, Frentzel H, Kulcsar G, Soos T. Control of the deliberate spread of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Biosecurity and bioterrorism: biodefense strategy, practice, and science. 2013;11 Suppl 1:S115–22. 10.1089/bsp.2013.0001 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Yigang XU, Yijing LI. Construction of recombinant Lactobacillus casei efficiently surface displayed and secreted porcine parvovirus VP2 protein and comparison of the immune responses induced by oral immunization. Immunology. 2008;124(1):68–75. 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2007.02738.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Fujkuyama Y, Tokuhara D, Kataoka K, Gilbert RS, McGhee JR, Yuki Y, et al. Novel vaccine development strategies for inducing mucosal immunity. Expert review of vaccines. 2012;11(3):367–79. 10.1586/erv.11.196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Ahrne S, Nobaek S, Jeppsson B, Adlerberth I, Wold AE, Molin G. The normal Lactobacillus flora of healthy human rectal and oral mucosa. Journal of applied microbiology. 1998;85(1):88–94. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Bron PA, Grangette C, Mercenier A, de Vos WM, Kleerebezem M. Identification of Lactobacillus plantarum genes that are induced in the gastrointestinal tract of mice. Journal of bacteriology. 2004;186(17):5721–9. 10.1128/Jb.186.17.5721-5729.2004 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Marco ML, Bongers RS, de Vos WM, Kleerebezem M. Spatial and temporal expression of Lactobacillus plantarum genes in the gastrointestinal tracts of mice. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2007;73(1):124–32. 10.1128/AEM.01475-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. de Vries MC, Vaughan EE, Kleerebezem M, de Vos WM. Lactobacillus plantarum- survival, functional and potential probiotic properties in the human intestinal tract. Int Dairy J. 2006;16(9):1018–28. 10.1016/j.idairyj.2005.09.003 . [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Huang HY, Hsieh RY, King VAE, Chi LL, Tsen JH. To pre-challenge lactic acid bacteria with simulated gastrointestinal conditions is a suitable approach to studying potential probiotic properties. Journal of microbiological methods. 2014;107:138–46. 10.1016/j.mimet.2014.09.005 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Tauer C, Heinl S, Egger E, Heiss S, Grabherr R. Tuning constitutive recombinant gene expression in Lactobacillus plantarum. Microbial cell factories. 2014;13:150 10.1186/s12934-014-0150-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Mohamadzadeh M, Duong T, Sandwick SJ, Hoover T, Klaenhammer TR. Dendritic cell targeting of Bacillus anthracis protective antigen expressed by Lactobacillus acidophilus protects mice from lethal challenge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106(11):4331–6. 10.1073/pnas.0900029106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Wells JM, Mercenier A. Mucosal delivery of therapeutic and prophylactic molecules using lactic acid bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008;6(5):349–62. 10.1038/nrmicro1840 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Xu Y, Cui L, Tian C, Zhang G, Huo G, Tang L, et al. Immunogenicity of recombinant classic swine fever virus CD8(+) T lymphocyte epitope and porcine parvovirus VP2 antigen coexpressed by Lactobacillus casei in swine via oral vaccination. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2011;18(11):1979–86. 10.1128/CVI.05204-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Ogra PL, Faden H, Welliver RC. Vaccination strategies for mucosal immune responses. Clinical microbiology reviews. 2001;14(2):430–45. 10.1128/CMR.14.2.430-445.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Sorvig E, Mathiesen G, Naterstad K, Eijsink VGH, Axelsson L. High-level, inducible gene expression in Lactobacillus sakei and Lactobacillus plantarum using versatile expression vectors. Microbiol-Sgm. 2005;151:2439–49. 10.1099/mic.0.28084-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Aukrust TW, Brurberg MB, Nes IF. Transformation of Lactobacillus by electroporation. Methods in molecular biology. 1995;47:201–8. 10.1385/0-89603-310-4:201 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Kleerebezem M, Boekhorst J, van Kranenburg R, Molenaar D, Kuipers OP, Leer R, et al. Complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2003;100(4):1990–5. 10.1073/pnas.0337704100 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Parida S, Anderson J, Cox SJ, Barnett PV, Paton DJ. Secretory IgA as an indicator of oro-pharyngeal foot-and-mouth disease virus replication and as a tool for post vaccination surveillance. Vaccine. 2006;24(8):1107–16. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.09.006 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Wang G, Pan L, Zhang YG, Wang YL, Zhang ZW, Lu JL, et al. Intranasal Delivery of Cationic PLGA Nano/Microparticles- Loaded FMDV DNA Vaccine Encoding IL-6 Elicited Protective Immunity against FMDV Challenge. Plos One. 2011;6(11). ARTN e27605 10.1371/journal.pone.0027605 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Ludi A, Rodriguez L. Novel approaches to foot-and-mouth disease vaccine development. Developments in biologicals. 2013;135:107–16. 10.1159/000313913 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Rodriguez LL, Grubman MJ. Foot and mouth disease virus vaccines. Vaccine. 2009;27 Suppl 4:D90–4. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.08.039 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Pan L, Zhang Z, Lv J, Zhou P, Hu W, Fang Y, et al. Induction of mucosal immune responses and protection of cattle against direct-contact challenge by intranasal delivery with foot-and-mouth disease virus antigen mediated by nanoparticles. International journal of nanomedicine. 2014;9:5603–18. 10.2147/IJN.S72318 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Ke Y, Li Y, Kapp JA. Ovalbumin injected with complete Freund's adjuvant stimulates cytolytic responses. European journal of immunology. 1995;25(2):549–53. 10.1002/eji.1830250237 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Zhou F, Rouse BT, Huang L. Induction of cytotoxic T lymphocytes in vivo with protein antigen entrapped in membranous vehicles. Journal of immunology. 1992;149(5):1599–604. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Kovacsovics-Bankowski M, Clark K, Benacerraf B, Rock KL. Efficient major histocompatibility complex class I presentation of exogenous antigen upon phagocytosis by macrophages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1993;90(11):4942–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Altmeyer R, Girard M, van der Werf S, Mimic V, Seigneur L, Saron MF. Attenuated Mengo virus: a new vector for live recombinant vaccines. Journal of virology. 1995;69(5):3193–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Ho PS, Kwang J, Lee YK. Intragastric administration of Lactobacillus casei expressing transmissible gastroentritis coronavirus spike glycoprotein induced specific antibody production. Vaccine. 2005;23(11):1335–42. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.09.015 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Irvine KR, McCabe BJ, Rosenberg SA, Restifo NP. Synthetic oligonucleotide expressed by a recombinant vaccinia virus elicits therapeutic CTL. Journal of immunology. 1995;154(9):4651–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Oliveira ML, Monedero V, Miyaji EN, Leite LC, Lee Ho P, Perez-Martinez G. Expression of Streptococcus pneumoniae antigens, PsaA (pneumococcal surface antigen A) and PspA (pneumococcal surface protein A) by Lactobacillus casei. FEMS microbiology letters. 2003;227(1):25–31. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Xu Y, Li Y. Induction of immune responses in mice after intragastric administration of Lactobacillus casei producing porcine parvovirus VP2 protein. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2007;73(21):7041–7. 10.1128/AEM.00436-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Medina E, Guzman CA. Use of live bacterial vaccine vectors for antigen delivery: potential and limitations. Vaccine. 2001;19(13–14):1573–80. 10.1016/S0264-410x(00)00354-6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Sasikumar P, Gomathi S, Anbazhagan K, Baby AE, Sangeetha J, Selvam GS. Genetically engineered Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 constitutively secreting heterologous oxalate decarboxylase and degrading oxalate under in vitro. Current microbiology. 2014;69(5):708–15. 10.1007/s00284-014-0644-2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Axelsson L, Rud I, Naterstad K, Blom H, Renckens B, Boekhorst J, et al. Genome sequence of the naturally plasmid-free Lactobacillus plantarum strain NC8 (CCUG 61730). Journal of bacteriology. 2012;194(9):2391–2. 10.1128/JB.00141-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Nguyen T, Mathiesen G, Fredriksen L, Kittl R, Nguyen H, Eijsink VGH, et al. A Food-Grade System for Inducible Gene Expression in Lactobacillus plantarum Using an Alanine Racemase-Encoding Selection Marker. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry. 2011;59(10):5617–24. 10.1021/jf104755r . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Xu W, Huang M, Zhang Y, Yi X, Dong W, Gao X, et al. Novel surface display system for heterogonous proteins on Lactobacillus plantarum. Letters in applied microbiology. 2011;53(6):641–8. 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2011.03160.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Bermudez-Humaran LG. Lactococcus lactis as a live vector for mucosal delivery of therapeutic proteins. Hum Vaccines. 2009;5(4):264–7. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Bermudez-Humaran LG, Kharrat P, Chatel JM, Langella P. Lactococci and lactobacilli as mucosal delivery vectors for therapeutic proteins and DNA vaccines. Microbial cell factories. 2011;10 Artn S4 10.1186/1475-2859-10-S1-S4 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Gareau MG, Sherman PM, Walker WA. Probiotics and the gut microbiota in intestinal health and disease. Nature reviews Gastroenterology & hepatology. 2010;7(9):503–14. 10.1038/nrgastro.2010.117 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Kechaou N, Chain F, Gratadoux JJ, Blugeon S, Bertho N, Chevalier C, et al. Identification of one novel candidate probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum strain active against influenza virus infection in mice by a large-scale screening. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2013;79(5):1491–9. 10.1128/AEM.03075-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Yin CS, Chen WY, Hu QQ, Wen ZY, Wang XJ, Ge JY, et al. Induction of protective immune response against both PPRV and FMDV by a novel recombinant PPRV expressing FMDV VP1. Vet Res. 2014;45 Artn 62 10.1186/1297-9716-45-62 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Jung JG, Lee YJ, Velmurugan N, Ko YJ, Lee HS, Jeong KJ. High-yield production of the VP1 structural protein epitope from serotype O foot-and-mouth disease virus in Escherichia coli. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;40(7):705–13. 10.1007/s10295-013-1273-7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Lentz EM, Segretin ME, Morgenfeld MM, Wirth SA, Dus Santos MJ, Mozgovoj MV, et al. High expression level of a foot and mouth disease virus epitope in tobacco transplastomic plants. Planta. 2010;231(2):387–95. 10.1007/s00425-009-1058-4 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Li ZY, Yi YZ, Yin XP, Zhang ZF, Liu JX. Expression of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Capsid Proteins in Silkworm-Baculovirus Expression System and Its Utilization as a Subunit Vaccine. Plos One. 2008;3(5). ARTN e2273 10.1371/journal.pone.0002273 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Shi XJ, Wang B, Zhang C, Wang M. Expressions of Bovine IFN-gamma and Foot-and-Mouth Disease VP1 antigen in P. pastoris and their effects on mouse immune response to FMD antigens. Vaccine. 2006;24(1):82–9. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.07.051 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Chai Z, Wang HW, Zhou GH, Yang DC, Wang JF, Yu L. Adenovirus-vectored type Asia1 foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) capsid proteins as a vehicle to display a conserved, neutralising epitope of type O FMDV. Journal of virological methods. 2013;188(1–2):175–82. 10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.08.021 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Jiang XP, Yu ML, Qiao XY, Liu M, Tang LJ, Jiang YP, et al. Up-regulation of MDP and tuftsin gene expression in Th1 and Th17 cells as an adjuvant for an oral Lactobacillus casei vaccine against anti-transmissible gastroenteritis virus. Applied microbiology and biotechnology. 2014;98(19):8301–12. 10.1007/s00253-014-5893-2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Shi SH, Yang WT, Yang GL, Cong YL, Huang HB, Wang Q, et al. Immunoprotection against influenza virus H9N2 by the oral administration of recombinant Lactobacillus plantarumNC8 expressing hemagglutinin in BALB/c mice. Virology. 2014;464:166–76. 10.1016/j.virol.2014.07.011 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Gunaydin G, Alvarez B, Lin Y, Hammarstrom L, Marcotte H. Co-expression of anti-rotavirus proteins (llama VHH antibody fragments) in Lactobacillus: development and functionality of vectors containing two expression cassettes in tandem. Plos One. 2014;9(4):e96409 10.1371/journal.pone.0096409 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Ma SJ, Li K, Li XS, Guo XQ, Fu PF, Yang MF, et al. Expression of bioactive porcine interferon-alpha in Lactobacillus casei. World journal of microbiology & biotechnology. 2014;30(9):2379–86. 10.1007/s11274-014-1663-7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Xue M, Wang H, Li W, Zhou G, Tu Y, Yu L. Effects of amino acid substitutions in the VP2 B-C loop on antigenicity and pathogenicity of serotype Asia1 foot-and-mouth disease virus. Virology journal. 2012;9:191 10.1186/1743-422X-9-191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Daniel C, Roussel Y, Kleerebezem M, Pot B. Recombinant lactic acid bacteria as mucosal biotherapeutic agents. Trends Biotechnol. 2011;29(10):499–508. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.05.002 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Berlec A, Strukelj B. Novel applications of recombinant lactic acid bacteria in therapy and in metabolic engineering. Recent patents on biotechnology. 2009;3(2):77–87. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Villatoro-Hernandez J, Montes-de-Oca-Luna R, Kuipers OP. Targeting diseases with genetically engineered Lactococcus lactis and its course towards medical translation. Expert opinion on biological therapy. 2011;11(3):261–7. 10.1517/14712598.2011.542138 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Sasikumar P, Gomathi S, Anbazhagan K, Abhishek A, Paul E, Vasudevan V, et al. Recombinant Lactobacillus plantarum expressing and secreting heterologous oxalate decarboxylase prevents renal calcium oxalate stone deposition in experimental rats. Journal of biomedical science. 2014;21:86 10.1186/s12929-014-0086-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper.