Abstract
To elucidate chloroplast genome evolution within neotropical-paleotropical bamboos, we fully characterized the chloroplast genome of the woody bamboo Guadua angustifolia. This genome is 135,331 bp long and comprises of an 82,839-bp large single-copy (LSC) region, a 12,898-bp small single-copy (SSC) region, and a pair of 19,797-bp inverted repeats (IRs). Comparative analyses revealed marked conservation of gene content and sequence evolutionary rates between neotropical and paleotropical woody bamboos. The neotropical herbaceous bamboo Cryptochloa strictiflora differs from woody bamboos in IR/SSC boundaries in that it exhibits slightly contracted IRs and a faster substitution rate. The G. angustifolia chloroplast genome is similar in size to that of neotropical herbaceous bamboos but is ~3 kb smaller than that of paleotropical woody bamboos. Dissimilarities in genome size are correlated with differences in the lengths of intergenic spacers, which are caused by large-fragment insertion and deletion. Phylogenomic analyses of 62 taxa yielded a tree topology identical to that found in preceding studies. Divergence time estimation suggested that most bamboo genera diverged after the Miocene and that speciation events of extant species occurred during or after the Pliocene.
Introduction
The chloroplast or plastid is a cellular organelle that is derived from a free-living cyanobacterial-like prokaryote; this event occurred by endosymbiosis ~1.5 billion years ago [1]. By interacting with the host genome and adapting to the cytoplasmic environment, plastids have undergone extensive genomic changes and have become indispensable to plant cells. One of the most remarkable changes to the original genome is the reduction of genome size; only ~5% of the original chloroplast genome remains [1, 2]. The chloroplast genomes of land plants range from 19 [3] to 218 kb [4] and, in most cases, exhibit a highly conserved quadripartite organization divided by a pair of inverted repeats (IRs) that separate the genome into a large single-copy (LSC) region and a small single-copy (SSC) region.
Although these conserved chloroplast genome structures are present in most plants, the chloroplasts of several angiosperms are an exception, having independently undergone substantial alterations. Gene loss and pseudogenization commonly occur during chloroplast evolution in parasitic plants [5, 6]. Such deletions of chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) sequences occur to various degrees, ranging from one or a few bases to whole genes or to one copy of the IR region [7, 8]. Some plants groups are amenable to large-scale rearrangements, including 90% of fern species [9], conifers [10] and the legume family [11]. Extensions or contractions of IR regions and gene loss also commonly occur during chloroplast genome evolution in angiosperms [12]. In addition, several cases of intracellular fragment acquisition by chloroplast genomes have been demonstrated in milkweeds, carrot (Daucus carota) [13] and five members of Bambusoideae [14, 15].
Because these structural mutations are accompanied by speciation over time, such informative changes are well suited to indicate evolution. The very nature of the chloroplast genome, including its small size, simple and conserved structure, tremendous evolutionary-rate variations among gene loci and abundant copies per cell, have rendered the chloroplast genome more useful in molecular evolutionary analyses and phylogenetic reconstruction than mitochondrial and nuclear genomes. Because the entire chloroplast sequence harbors complete and stronger phylogenetic signals compared with the small number of loci, chloroplast genomes have been extensively utilized for comparative and phylogenetic studies in association with large, closely related and globally distributed plant groups [16, 17], albeit the advantages of having a complete chloroplast genome sequence might be offset by lower sampling [18]. Given these characteristics, chloroplast genomes represent good models for testing lineage-specific molecular evolution.
Selective pressures lead plants to diversify as they adapt to new terrestrial landscapes. Chloroplast genomes bear the scars of these pressures by exhibiting different patterns of diversity in different environments. The evolution of smaller chloroplast genomes, for instance, tends to be associated with harsh environments [19]. Currently, little is known about the genetic processes that govern the evolution of closely related species that grow in the neotropics or paleotropics. Bamboos are among the most typical of plant species that occupy both the paleotropics and the neotropics and are members of the subfamily Bambusoideae of Poaceae. This subfamily has diverged into three distinct lineages that correspond to three tribes, i.e., Arundinarieae (temperate woody bamboos), Bambuseae (tropical woody bamboos) and Olyreae (herbaceous bamboos) [20]. Species in the Bambuseae tribe are usually subdivided into paleotropical and neotropical groups. By June 2015, 46 entirely sequenced chloroplast genomes from bamboos (25 from Arundinarieae, 10 from Olyreae, and 16 from Bambuseae) were available in the NCBI database [14, 15, 21–24]. Studies have analyzed full chloroplast sequences to understand the relationship between bamboo species. Here, we present an analysis of chloroplast genome evolution in representative paleotropical and neotropical bamboos using one new molecular data and other published chloroplast genomes. We report the sequence of the complete chloroplast genome of Guadua angustifolia Kunth, an economically and ecologically important neotropical bamboo that is found in Colombia, Ecuador and Venezuela. The main purpose of this study is to apply comparative genomics approaches to test the hypothesis that the chloroplast genomes of paleotropical and neotropical species have evolved differently due to differences in the selective forces between continents.
Materials and Methods
DNA extraction, genome sequencing and assembly
Leaves of G. angustifolia were harvested in the Hua’an Bamboo Garden, Fujian Province, China (25° 00′ 52.07″ N, 117° 32′ 04.13″ E; the plant was introduced from Ecuador in 2001). G. angustifolia is not an endangered or protected species, and the sample collection was approved by the Forestry Bureau of Hua’an County.
Total DNA was isolated from silica gel-dried leaves using the mCTAB method [25]. The chloroplast genome was amplified using 138 universal primer pairs, which were provided by Dong et al. [26]. The fragments were then sequenced using the Sanger method. All sequences were proofread and assembled using Sequencher 4.7 software (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA). Gaps were bridged by sequences that were amplified using G. angustifolia-specific primers (S1 Table). The complete chloroplast genome was finally assembled from 226,314 bp of sequence data, representing approximately 1.7-fold coverage of the G. angustifolia chloroplast genome. The genomic structure was further verified following the method of Dong et al. [26].
Genome annotation and visualization
The resulting chloroplast genome was annotated using DOGMA [27]. Using this web-based tool, start/stop codons and intron/exon boundaries were adjusted after BLASTX searching (e-value cutoff = 1e-10) for homologous genes against a custom database of 16 previously published chloroplast genomes. The obtained tRNA genes were further confirmed using DOGMA and tRNAscan-SE [28]. The GenomeVx program [29] was applied to graphically display the physical genetic loci within the chloroplast genome.
Structural and sequence variations among the chloroplast genomes of alliances
The chloroplast genomes of the herbaceous bamboo Cryptochloa strictiflora (E.Fourn.) Swallen and the paleotropical woody bamboo Dendrocalamus latiflorus Munro were compared to that of G. angustifolia (the reference species). Variations in gene contents and orders were then visualized using MultiPipmaker (http://pipmaker.bx.psu.edu/pipmaker/). The relative evolutionary rates of the protein-coding sequences of the three chloroplast genomes were quantified based on nonsynonymous (dN) and synonymous (dS) substitutions and their ratios (ω = dN/dS); Ferrocalamus rimosivaginus was used as an outgroup. dN and dS were computed according to the Nei and Gohobori method as implemented in the PAML package v4.4 [30] using the F3×4 codon-based substitution model. Only codons shared among all chloroplast genomes were compared. Pseudogenes (ndhH and ycf68) were not included in the analyses. dN, dS and ω were calculated for (1) individual protein-coding genes; (2) all protein-encoding genes combined; and (3) groups of genes with the same functions, e.g., photosynthesis ATP-synthase genes or NADH-dehydrogenase genes. Tajima’s relative rate test, as implemented in MEGA 5 [31], was applied to determine the constancy of evolutionary rates among the three bamboos. Differences between estimated dN and dS values among gene groups within each species were tested for significance using the Kruskal-Wallis test (SPSS v.18.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL,USA).
Sequence alignment and phylogenomic inference
To determine the phylogenetic position and divergence time of G. angustifolia, 61 complete chloroplast genomes, representing 38 genera of Poaceae (S2 Table), were obtained from GenBank and aligned with the chloroplast genome of G. angustifolia. Based on APG III [32], Anomochloa marantoidea Brogn. was defined as the outgroup. Multiple alignments were generated for full-length chloroplast genomes using Clustal X [33] followed by manual correction with Se-Al [34]. IRa, long gaps introduced in one or several sequences and unreliably aligned regions were excluded from the analyses. The remaining gaps were treated as missing data. Phylogenomic trees were constructed using maximum parsimony (MP), maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian methods. MP analysis was conducted using PAUP version 4.0 b10 [35]. Parsimony heuristic searches were performed with TBR branch swapping using 1,000 random sequence-addition replicates, and bootstrap support was obtained from 1,000 replicates. ML phylogenetic analysis was performed using RAxML [36] and 1,000 bootstrap replicates. The GTR+G+I model was chosen using Modeltest v 3.7 [37]. Bayesian inference (BI) was conducted using MrBayes 3.2.2 [38]. One tree was sampled every 1,000 generations for 5,000,000 generations until the average standard deviation of split frequencies fell below 0.01, with 25% as burn-in. The ML and BI analyses were run on the CIPRES Science Gateway V.3.3 [39].
Divergence time estimation
A Bayesian dating analysis was performed using the BEAST v 1.7.3 package [40] to estimate the divergence time of the focal bamboo species and of other Poaceae lineages. To lower the computing burden, we constructed a reduced dataset of 46 chloroplast genomes by retaining only one representative chloroplast genome per genus. The input file for the analyses was prepared using BEAUti. BEAST runs were conducted using the model GTR+G+I with an uncorrelated lognormal relaxed clock model, a Yule prior on speciation, and relative priors on divergence times. The molecular tree was calibrated by (1) placing a 90–115 Ma [41, 42] constraint on the crown group of Poaceae, (2) setting the split of Oryza and Leersia between 5–34.5 Ma [43], and (3) placing a minimum of 3.12 Ma and a maximum of 5.3 Ma on Guadua based on the existence of macrofossils in the Pliocene [44, 45]. Posterior distributions of parameters were approximated using MCMC analyses of 7 separate runs of 50 million generations. One tree was sampled every 1,000 generations, and the first 25% of the sampled trees was discarded as burn-in. All outputs were inspected in Tracer v 1.5 (http://www.beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/) to verify that the effective sample size (ESS) statistic exceeded 200 for all estimated parameters. The maximum clade credibility tree was summarized using TreeAnnotator v1.7.3. BEAST analyses were also performed at the CIPRES Science Gateway V.3.3 [39].
Results
Genome feature for G. angustifolia
The complete G. angustifolia chloroplast genome (KM365071) exhibited the conventional chloroplast quadripartite structure of land plants and mapped as a single circular double-stranded DNA molecule of 135,331 bp (Fig 1). The chloroplast genome harbored an LSC region of 82,839 bp, an SSC region of 12,898 bp, and two IR regions of 19,797 bp each. The AT content of the entire genome was 61.3%. The AT contents of the various genomic components were as follows: 60.6% in protein-coding genes, 48.0% in tRNA genes, 45.3% in rRNA genes, 61.6% in introns, and 65.2% in intergenic spacers.
There were 112 unique genes in the G. angustifolia chloroplast genome, including 77 protein-coding genes, 31 tRNA genes and 4 rRNA genes. Nineteen genes were duplicated in the IR regions, yielding a total of 131 genes in this newly determined chloroplast genome. A total of 60 protein-coding genes and 22 tRNA genes were distributed within the LSC, and 10 protein-coding genes and 1 tRNA gene were present within the SSC. Among the 15 intron-containing genes, only the ycf3 gene contained two intervening introns; the remaining genes contained one intron each. The rps12 gene comprised three exons; one exon fell into the LSC region, and the remaining two exons were duplicated in the IR regions. The IR/SSC boundary lay in the ndhH gene, resulting in part of ndhH being duplicated in IRb as a pseudogene.
The architecture, gene content and AT content of the G. angustifolia chloroplast genome resembled those of other published tropical and temperate bamboos (Table 1). In particular, the two congeneric species of Guadua showed greater chloroplast genomic similarities, with a total of 153 sequence variations (110 SNPs, 41 indels and two inversions). Amongst the 130 SNPs detected, 57% corresponded to transitions and 43% to transversions. Of the 41 indels, 27 were mononucleotide repeats, and the remainders were small indels (5–27 bp) that were present in noncoding regions (rps16-trnQ, trnS-psbZ, psbZ-trnG, psbM-petN, petN-trnC, trnC-rpoB, atpF intron, ycf3 intron, rbcL-psaI, petD-rpoA, rps15-ndhF, ndhF-rpl32).
Table 1. Global features of bamboo chloroplast genomes.
Features | Size (bp) | LSC (bp) | SSC (bp) | IRs (bp) | Spacer length (bp) | Intron length (bp) | AT content (%) | No. of genes | No. of introns |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CS | 135,033 | 80,556 | 13,465 | 20,506 | 46,893 | 15,985 | 61.1 | 127 | 16 |
DL | 139,394 | 83,011 | 12,875 | 21,754 | 51,656 | 15,988 | 61.1 | 128 | 16 |
GA | 135,331 | 82,839 | 12,898 | 19,797 | 46,846 | 15,960 | 61.3 | 128 | 16 |
GW | 135,324 | 82,806 | 12,932 | 19,793 | 47,095 | 15,985 | 61.2 | 128 | 16 |
AP | 139,697 | 83,273 | 12,834 | 21,795 | 51,245 | 15,968 | 61.1 | 128 | 16 |
AG | 138,935 | 82,632 | 12,711 | 21,796 | 50,507 | 15,924 | 61.1 | 128 | 16 |
BE | 139,493 | 82,988 | 12,901 | 21,802 | 50,925 | 15,975 | 61.1 | 128 | 16 |
FR | 139,467 | 83,091 | 12,718 | 21,829 | 51,256 | 16,017 | 61.2 | 128 | 16 |
IL | 139,668 | 83,273 | 12,811 | 21,792 | 51,143 | 15,926 | 61.1 | 128 | 16 |
PE | 139,679 | 83,213 | 12,811 | 21,798 | 51,195 | 15,991 | 61.1 | 128 | 16 |
TL | 161,572 | 89,140 | 19,652 | 26,390 | 52,898 | 18,118 | 66.2 | 131 | 18 |
CS: Crytochloa strictiflora;
DL: Dendrocalamus latiflorus;
GA: Guadua angustifolia;
GW: Guadua weberbaueri;
AP: Acidosasa purpurea;
AG: Arundinaria gigantea;
BE: Bambusa emeiensis;
FR: Ferrocalamus rimoslvaginus;
IL: Indocalamus longiauritus;
PE: Phyllostachys edulis;
TL: Typha latifolia.
These genomic characteristics were quite common even when compared with other grasses [46]. Further comparison with the early diverging Poales T. latifolia indicated that all Poaceae chloroplast genomes had relatively compact sizes (~135–139 kb vs ~161 kb). Additionally, as reported in previous studies, [47], features unique to Poaceae were observed, such as the loss of the ycf1, ycf2 and accD genes, as well as loss of the introns of clpP and rpoC1. In addition, three DNA inversions between trnS GCU and trnfM CAU within the LSC region were found in all Poaceae species.
Chloroplast genome comparison among G. angustifolia, Dendrocalamus latiflorus and Cryptochloa strictiflora
Sequence differences among the three representative tropical bamboos (G. angustifolia, D. latiflorus and C. strictiflora) were visually quantified using “percent identity plots”the annotation of G. angustifolia was used as a reference (Fig 2). Global alignments revealed perfect synteny among the three chloroplast genomes, and C. strictiflora presented a higher level of sequence divergence. Overall, woody G. angustifolia shared 98.7% sequence similarity with D. latiflora and 95.1% similarity with C. strictiflora. The IRs were more conserved than the LSC and SSC. Variations appeared more abundant in noncoding regions (intergenic spacer regions and introns) than in coding regions. Mutational hotspot regions in the alignment were also identified and encompassed the trnG-trnT, trnD-psbM, rpl32-ccsA, and ndhF-rpl32 regions. Other evolutionary differences among the three chloroplast genomes were mainly inferred from genome size, IR expansion and contraction, and the pseudogene at the IRb/SSC border.
Genome size
The G. angustifolia chloroplast genome was 4,063 bp smaller than that of the paleotropical bamboo D. latiflorus and was slightly larger than that of herbaceous bamboo C. strictiflora (Table 1). The lengths of the LSC and SSC differed little between the two woody bamboos despite the distinct difference in the overall size of their chloroplast genomes. However, a much shorter LSC and a longer SSC, 80 kb and 13 kb, respectively, were observed for the herbaceous bamboo C. strictiflora.
The chloroplast protein synthesis apparatus was almost identical in the three bamboos, except that C. strictiflora possessed only one copy of the rps15 gene due to a shifted IR/SSC border (138 bp). Nevertheless, coding regions and introns remained largely invariant; the total coding region varied from 75,458 bp (D. latiflorus) to 75,888 bp (G. angustifolia), whereas the total intron length varied from 14,064 bp (G. angustifolia) to 14,135 bp (C. strictiflora).
The genome size differences between the neotropical and paleotropical bamboos were primarily due to length variations in the intergenic spacers that resulted from insertion/deletion changes. In comparison with D. latiflorus, an exceptional IR-located 1,521-bp deletion in the trnI-trnL spacers and a 461-bp deletion in rps12-trnV were found in G. angustifolia. These unusual intergenic deletions clearly led to the decreased genome size of G. angustifolia. When the intergenic spacers of G. angustifolia were contrasted with those of C. strictiflora, 12 intergenic spacers were found to have notable length differences >100 bp, 7 of which were expanded and 5 were diminished. Taken together, these length differences accounted for the slight variations in the total length of the spacing regions of these two chloroplast genomes (46,938 bp for G. angustifolia and 46,846 bp for C. strictiflora).
IR expansion and contraction and gene pseudogenization
Expansion and contraction of IR regions led to differences at the IR borders among the three complete bamboo chloroplast genomes, as shown in Fig 3. Complete rps19 genes resided in the IRs at varying distances to the IRb/LSC junction (47 bp, 28 bp and 38 bp in C. strictiflora, D. latiflorus and G. angustifolia, respectively). Although the IR regions of G. angustifolia (19,797 bp) were much shorter than those of D. latiflorus (21,754 bp), G. angustifolia and D. latiflorus were quite similar at the IR/SSC boundary. The ndhH gene, which is encoded by 196 bp in D. latiflorus and by 198 bp in G. angustifolia, straddled the IRa/SSC junction and generated an incomplete copy (ΨndhH) in the IRb of both chloroplast genomes.
The IR/SSC junction locations were slightly disparate in herbaceous bamboo C. strictiflora. The IR region of C. strictiflora had contracted; thus, the junction of IRb/SSC falls into the ndhF gene. This contraction also causes the rps15 and ndhH genes to occur as single-copy genes within the SSC rather than in the IR regions, as observed in the two woody bamboos. Consequently, this phenomenon generated the other pseudogene ΨndhF at the IRa/ SSC boundary region and reduced the total number of C. strictiflora genes to 127.
The ycf68 gene that was nested in the trnI GAU intron in the IR regions appeared to be a complete 405-bp open reading frame in the woody bamboo G. angustifolia and D. latiflorus but was much shorter in the herbaceous bamboo C. strictiflora. The 45th codon was identified as a stop codon that disrupted the CDS; thus, ycf68 is likely to be a pseudogene in C. strictiflora.
Evolutionary rates of neotropical-paleotropical chloroplast genomes
Using the F. rimosivaginus chloroplast genome as a reference, the dN, dS and ω of 76 protein-coding genes in G. angustifolia, D. latiflorus and C. strictiflora were computed and compared (Table 2, S3 Table). Unsurprisingly, rate heterogeneity existed among lineages, gene groups and genes. For all the coding genes combined, the mean dN and dS values were generally higher in C. strictiflora (0.0148±0.0006 and 0.0823±0.0027, separately) than in G. angustifolia or D. latiflorus. G. angustifolia and D. latiflorus showed similar dN and dS rates (Kruskal-Wallis tests; P = 0.278 for dN, P = 0.631for dS); the value of ω was slightly higher in D. latiflorus, revealing similar evolutionary rates between the paleotropical and neotropical woody bamboos. Relative rate tests further confirmed that the substitution rates were statistically higher in most of the C. strictiflora genes analyzed (49 out of 76 genes) (P<0.001). Only in C. strictiflora was there a slight correlation between dN and dS across genes (Pearson’s r = 0.25, P = 0.0315).
Table 2. Average substitution rates of 76 concatenated protein-coding genes in the three studied chloroplast genomes.
Taxa | Nonsynonymous (dN) | Synonymous (dS) | dN/dS (ω) |
---|---|---|---|
C. strictiflora | 0.0148±0.0006 | 0.0823±0.0027 | 0.1801 |
D. latiflorus | 0.0057±0.0004 | 0.0271±0.0014 | 0.2091 |
G. angustifolia | 0.0053±0.004 | 0.0297±0.0015 | 0.1776 |
F. rimosivaginus is used as a reference. Data are showed as the means ± standard errors.
After sorting the genes into functional categories, significant differences were revealed among the groups. The cemA matK and ccsA genes exhibited the highest dN and ω values, whereas dS was highest in infA (0.0567) (Fig 4A). Higher ratios of dN and dS indicated that the cemA, matK, ccsA, rbcL and ribosomal protein genes were selected for sequence diversity, and the psb and psa genes were conserved to a greater extent than the other gene groups (Fig 4B). Among the gene categories, the mean dN varied in C. strictiflora and G. angustifolia (Kruskal-Wallis test, P<0.05), whereas the mean dS values were uniform in each bamboo examined. Not all gene groups contained sufficient numbers of genes to apply multiple comparison tests, which require at least two data points in each group. Thus, the Student Newman Keuls (S-N-K) multiple comparison tests were performed on the first 9 groups shown in Fig 4. In both cases exhibiting significantly different dN values, psb, pet and psa presented the smallest mean dN values.
A comparison among individual genes in each functional group (S4 Table) showed that substitution rates fluctuated widely among the 76 genes, with dN values ranging from 0 to 0.05 and dS values ranging from 0 to 0.263. The highest dN value was detected in matK, and the highest dS value was detected in rpl36. Most genes exhibited dN/dS ratios of less than 0.5, indicating the efficiency of purifying selection. Two genes in D. latiflorus, rpl32 and rpl33, both of which were functionally essential in translation activity, exhibited dN/dS ratios that were significantly greater than unity (1.2009 and 1.3791).
Phylogenomic position of G. angustifolia and age estimates
A dataset of 113,641 unambiguously aligned nucleotide characters was finally subjected to phylogenomic analysis. MP, ML and BI analyses recovered almost identical and strongly supported relationships among the major clades (Fig 5). The phylogenomic tree identified seven clades corresponding to six subfamilies and a PACMAD group. The subfamily Bambusoideae (Clade G), which was united with Pooideae, formed a sister group to Oryzoideae. Within Bambusoideae, all three trees showed similar topologies with strong bootstrap support. The subfamily has diverged into two major subclades. Subclade G1 comprises temperate woody bamboos classified as Arundinarieae, and Subclade G2 comprises tropical woody and herbaceous bamboos that are classified into Bambuseae and Olyreae, respectively. The tropical herbaceous bamboos are sisters to the woody bamboos, and the neotropical bamboos are sisters to the paleotropical bamboos. A long branch leading to the herbaceous bamboos indicated accelerated rates of evolution. As expected, the newly sequenced G. angustifolia was grouped with its congener G. weberbaueri, and both species share a phylogenetic neighborhood with other neotropical bamboos.
Initial divergence dates of the major clades within Poaceae were estimated based on entire chloroplast genome data (Fig 6). The divergence times of Poaceae major lineages primarily fell within the Paleocene and the Eocene (S5 Table). Bambusoideae diverged from Pooideae during the Eocene. The split between temperate and tropical bamboos likely occurred during the Oligocene. The temperate bamboos radiated from the late Pliocene. The herbaceous bamboos diverged from their woody counterparts during the late Oligocene (16.34–41.75 Ma 95% highest posterior density, HPD), and the neotropical woody bamboos diverged from the paleotropical woody bamboos during the Miocene (HPD: 10.21–29.77 Ma).
Discussion
The conserved chloroplast genome of bamboos
Complete sequencing and comparative analyses demonstrated that the neotropical G. angustifolia chloroplast genome bears a high level of conservation in terms of architecture and linear sequence order with other members of Bambusoideae. The most conspicuous difference appeared in chloroplast genome size when G. angustifolia was compared to its woody relatives. With the smallest IR size known in bamboos (19,797 bp), a ~3 kb smaller chloroplast genome was present in G. angustifolia (Table 1). The relative size of IRs varies significantly among angiosperm. Such changes are generally shaped by frequent contraction/expansion into or out of single-copy regions [12].In contrast, large intergenic sequence deletions in the IR region were ultimately responsible for the small IR size of G. angustifolia. Despite their differences in size, the gene content of the IRs remained identical. Exceptions included the rps15 gene and genes located in the SSC-end of the IR; accompanying the IR/SSC boundary shift, woody bamboos organized rps15 and a portion of the ndhH gene in each of the IRs, whereas the rps15 gene of C. strictiflora was fully confined to the SSC, and a part of ndhF resided in the IRs (Fig 3). Previously, both forms of IRs were reported in the grass family as symplesiomorphic states [48]. The C. strictiflora-like IR, which also emerged in taxa of the PACMAD clade, supports the idea that IR/SSC borders evolved independently in the grass family and was not consistent with the observed phylogenetic relationships.
The functions of hypothetical gene ycf68 are ambiguous in different land plant types, probably because the >400-bp open reading frame of ycf68 can be read through without any internal stop codon in the chloroplast genomes of some plants but not in others. In woody bamboos, the ycf68 locus appeared to be intact. However, in the herbaceous bamboo C. strictiflora, the identification of the frameshifting change and stop codon approximately one-third of the way into the ycf68 region suggests that this sequence is a pseudogene. Thus, this result added new evidence confirming the suggestion by Raubeson et al. [49] that ycf68, although conserved, appears to be nonfunctional because of its location in the generally conserved IR region.
Whole chloroplast genome phylogeny of bamboos
Although some bamboos occur in subtropical or even temperate regions, the great majority of bamboos occupy tropical and semi-tropical areas [50]. Bamboos have traditionally been classified into two tribes, Bambuseae (woody) and Olyreae (herbaceous), on the basis of morphological characteristics. Woody bamboos were further subdivided into temperate woody and tropical woody bamboos [51]. However, subsequent molecular phylogenetic studies based on multiple cpDNA fragments [20, 52] revealed a different scenario; in the new understanding, woody bamboos do not represent a monophyletic group because temperate bamboos form a sister clade to tropical bamboos. This classification scheme is supported by our phylogenomic analyses (Fig 5) and by the results of Burke et al. [21]. Recent analyses of three single-copy nuclear genes [53] offered additional evidence that woody bamboos originated through hybridization between five lineages in this group and that the paraphyly supported by chloroplast markers was likely an artifact. Conflict between chloroplast and nuclear phylogenetic trees suggests different patterns of evolution among sequence sets. Chloroplast genes are uniparentally inherited as a linked unit; therefore, chloroplast capture or lineage sorting might have occurred following the early hybridization of woody bamboos. In contrast, nuclear genes evolve independently through recombination. Therefore, single-copy nuclear loci that reflect similar evolutionary processes might provide true phylogenetic signals. In Triplett’s study [53], it was evident that one of the markers still implied the potential grouping of herbaceous and tropical woody bamboos. Because bamboos form a perplexing group that is noted for hybridization and polyploidy, with recent diversification, the chloroplast inference reported here only represents the maternally inherited signals. More robust inferences regarding bamboo history require the use of additional independent nuclear markers or other lines of evidence, such as mitochondrial phylogenetic markers and data sets obtained from ESTs.
Evolutionary rates of neotropical-paleotropical bamboos
Because the nonsynonymous and synonymous substitution rates might indicate the constraints of natural selection on organisms, estimation of these mutations plays a pivotal role in understanding the dynamics of molecular evolution [54]. Substitution rate estimations indicate that genes of neotropical-paleotropical bamboos have evolved at variable rates, and patterns of substitution differ both in functional categories and lineages. Based on our knowledge of gene groups, variable rates have been proposed to link with a number of factors, such as relaxed or positive selection, functional constraints, and gene expression level [55]. However, distinguishing the prevailing factor governing locus-specific molecular evolution might prove difficult. As suggested by studies on the photosynthetic plants Geraniaceae [56], which showed accelerated substitution rates in ribosomal protein genes, rate variations might be due to differences in faulty DNA repair and in gene expression patterns. The former might be less likely given the perfect sequence synteny (no rearrangement) among the three bamboos (Fig 2). Alternatively, the hypothesis that gene expression level and substitution rate are negatively correlated is attractive because the same trend appears to be true in Marchantia polymorphs and Nicotiana terbium [57]. According to our data, the mutation rates of the psa and psb genes were less variable than those of the ccsA, matK, cemA and rpl genes, as evidenced by the lower dN/dS ratios obtained (Fig 4B, S4 Table). These rate patterns were consistent, to some extent, with Geraniaceae [56] and other grass lineages [58]. Although we do not have data on chloroplast gene expression in bamboos, gene expression levels could potentially affect the variable substitution rates among gene groups. Genome-scale analyses of gene expression would be required to advance our understanding of this point.
Early phylogenetic analyses suggested that herbaceous bamboos have evolved more rapidly than woody bamboos [59, 60]. By the same token, in our phylogenomic comparison, the herbaceous bamboo C. strictiflora was observed to display a longer phylogenetic branch length, which indicates an overall rate acceleration. Similarly, in the herbaceous C. strictiflora, the accumulation of mutations at both nonsynonymous and synonymous sites occurred at approximately twice the rate of its woody bamboo homologs (Table 2), a result supported by relative rate tests (P<0.05). Our analyses also show a strong correlation between dN and dS values in C. strictiflora (Pearson’s r = 0.25, P = 0.0315), hinting at a lineage-specific effect on this species. Because C. strictiflora is a herbaceous perennial that flowers annually [61], the higher overall substitution rates in the herbaceous bamboo C. strictiflora clearly support the general observation that molecular evolutionary rates are negatively scaled with generation time [62, 63]. It is worth noting that the rates of 27 loci that were estimated using Tajima's rate test were not significantly different from those obtained in woody bamboos (S3 Table). However, when looking more closely at the Nei and Gohobori results for each of the 27 genes, either the dN or dS of C. strictiflora (S4 Table) remained above those of woody species. This finding suggests that although relative rates failed to reject rate constancy for some genes among the three bamboos, the overall mutation rate of DNA evolution in herbaceous C. strictiflora is primarily generation-time dependent. Tajima’s test lacks the statistical power to detect moderate levels of rate variation for sequences of closely related species [64]. This is a plausible explanation for the somewhat discrepant results of the two methods.
Excluding C. strictiflora, few differences remained between the two woody bamboos in terms of sequence evolutionary rates. Both the dN and dS values of G. angustifolia were rather similar to those of D. latiflorus across all coding genes (Kruskal-Wallis tests; P = 0.278 for dN, P = 0.631 for dS), indicating that the selective constraints on the coding genes of these two species were comparable. These bamboos are both giant woody species with long generation times, and both exhibit little or no changes in structural organization of the chloroplast genomes; these observations might partly explain why these species evolved at similarly low rates. Based on our chloroplast-level divergence time estimates (Fig 6), the exact age of the neotropical bamboo G. angustifolia and the paleotropical bamboo D. latiflorus could not be strictly inferred due to incomplete sampling. The nodal 95% HPD of the most recent common ancestor for G. angustifolia and D. latiflorus greatly overlapped, possibly reflecting that they evolved over a similar period of time. Thus, identical and more recent divergence times might also explain the similar evolutionary rates between these two woody bamboos. Although strong selective pressures act against broad variations in functional genes, intergenic spacers might lack such constraints. We found a strong geographical link with the sequence evolution of intergenic spacers. Bamboos that grow in the New World consistently shared a very low probability of indel character in intergenic spacers. These indel mutations, although occurring in different regions among bamboos, were the principal factors shaping the chloroplast genome shrinkage. Also of note, such large length variations in intergenic spacers were commonly found within the BEP clade [65], which had diverged over a similar timescale as the neotropical bamboos. On the basis of this characteristic, neotropical bamboos represent a distinct lineage that differs from the paleotropical bamboos; however, the evolutionary causes of these mutation events are not very clear.
Divergence time of Bambuseae
Considerable variation in the dates of bamboo history exists among published works [42, 66]. Divergence date estimates for nodes using molecular sequences rely heavily on phylogeny, dating algorithms and calibration strategies. Previous studies of bamboos were heavily based on one or several DNA segments [42, 67], which may be insufficient to estimate the true branch lengths. To compensate for this deficiency, the present study applied complete chloroplast genome sequences to reconstruct the evolutionary history of bamboos. Compared with earlier genome-scale calibrated analyses of 12 bamboos with 3 calibration points [68], our molecular dating results are slightly younger. This result might also reflect the impact of the use of different calibration dates. We employed a new Pliocene macrofossil as a constraint for the Guadua crown group instead of using only secondary calibration points. Most bamboo genera appear to have diverged after the Miocene, and speciation events of extant species appear to have occurred during or after the Pliocene. Some nodes had large credibility intervals, possibly due to the use of fewer calibrations and incomplete sampling. Given that our estimated time accords with the bamboo fossil evidence at the time of the Miocene [69, 70], the resulting molecular divergence time of bamboos might represent a reasonable estimate despite the large divergence time intervals of some nodes.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank Changhao Li for assistance with the data processing. We also thank American Journal Experts (AJE) for the English editing service. This work was supported by a grant from the Forestry Discipline Construction Fund of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University.
Data Availability
The nucleotide sequence of G. angustifolia has been dposited in GenBank (Accession number: KM365071).
Funding Statement
This work was supported by a grant from the Forestry Discipline Construction Fund of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University.
References
- 1. Gould SB, Waller RF, McFadden GI. Plastid evolution. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:491–517. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092915 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Wicke S, Schneeweiss GM, dePamphilis CW, Muller KF, Quandt D. The evolution of the plastid chromosome in land plants: gene content, gene order, gene function. Plant Mol Biol. 2011;76(3–5):273–297. 10.1007/s11103-011-9762-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Schelkunov MI, Shtratnikova VY, Nuraliev MS, Selosse MA, Penin AA, Logacheva MD. Exploring the limits for reduction of plastid genomes: a case study of the mycoheterotrophic orchids Epipogium aphyllum and Epipogium roseum . Genome Biol Evol. 2015;7(4):1179–1191. 10.1093/gbe/evv019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Chumley TW, Palmer JD, Mower JP, Fourcade HM, Calie PJ, Boore JL, et al. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Pelargonium× hortorum: organization and evolution of the largest and most highly rearranged chloroplast genome of land plants. Mol Biol Evol. 2006;23(11):2175–2190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Wicke S, Muller KF, de Pamphilis CW, Quandt D, Wickett NJ, Zhang Y, et al. Mechanisms of functional and physical genome reduction in photosynthetic and nonphotosynthetic parasitic plants of the broomrape family. Plant Cell. 2013;25(10):3711–3725. 10.1105/tpc.113.113373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Delannoy E, Fujii S, des Francs-Small CC, Brundrett M, Small I. Rampant gene loss in the underground orchid Rhizanthella gardneri highlights evolutionary constraints on plastid genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28(7):2077–2086. 10.1093/molbev/msr028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Wickett NJ, Forrest LL, Budke JM, Shaw B, Goffinet B. Frequent pseudogenization and loss of the plastid-encoded sulfate-transport gene cysA throughout the evolution of liverworts. Am J Bot. 2011;98(8):1263–1275. 10.3732/ajb.1100010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Yi X, Gao L, Wang B, Su YJ, Wang T. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Cephalotaxus oliveri (Cephalotaxaceae): evolutionary comparison of Cephalotaxus chloroplast DNAs and insights into the loss of inverted repeat copies in gymnosperms. Genome Biol Evol. 2013;5(4):688–698. 10.1093/gbe/evt042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Wolf PG, Roper JM, Duffy AM. The evolution of chloroplast genome structure in ferns. Genome. 2010;53(9):731–738. 10.1139/g10-061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Wu CS, Chaw SM. Highly rearranged and size-variable chloroplast genomes in conifers II clade (cupressophytes): evolution towards shorter intergenic spacers. Plant Biotechnol J. 2014;12(3):344–353. 10.1111/pbi.12141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Martin GE, Rousseau-Gueutin M, Cordonnier S, Lima O, Michon-Coudouel S, Naquin D, et al. The first complete chloroplast genome of the Genistoid legume Lupinus luteus: evidence for a novel major lineage-specific rearrangement and new insights regarding plastome evolution in the legume family. Ann Bot. 2014;113(7):1197–1210. 10.1093/aob/mcu050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Jansen RK, Ruhlman TA. Plastid genomes of seed plants Genomics of chloroplasts and mitochondria: Springer; 2012. p. 103–126. [Google Scholar]
- 13. Smith DR. Mitochondrion-to-plastid DNA transfer: it happens. New Phytol. 2014;202(3):736–738. 10.1111/nph.12704 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Wysocki WP, Clark LG, Attigala L, Ruiz-Sanchez E, Duvall MR. Evolution of the bamboos (Bambusoideae; Poaceae): a full plastome phylogenomic analysis. BMC Evol Biol. 2015;15(1):50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Ma PF, Zhang YX, Guo ZH, Li DZ. Evidence for horizontal transfer of mitochondrial DNA to the plastid genome in a bamboo genus. Scientific reports. 2015;5:11608 10.1038/srep11608 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Kumar S, Hahn FM, McMahan CM, Cornish K, Whalen MC. Comparative analysis of the complete sequence of the plastid genome of Parthenium argentatum and identification of DNA barcodes to differentiate Parthenium species and lines. BMC Plant Biol. 2009;9:131 10.1186/1471-2229-9-131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Parks M, Cronn R, Liston A. Increasing phylogenetic resolution at low taxonomic levels using massively parallel sequencing of chloroplast genomes. BMC biology. 2009;7(1):84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Burleigh JG, Bansal MS, Eulenstein O, Hartmann S, Wehe A, Vision TJ. Genome-scale phylogenetics: inferring the plant tree of life from 18,896 gene trees. Syst Biol. 2011;60(2):117–125. 10.1093/sysbio/syq072 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Wu CS, Lai YT, Lin CP, Wang YN, Chaw SM. Evolution of reduced and compact chloroplast genomes (cpDNAs) in gnetophytes: selection toward a lower-cost strategy. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2009;52(1):115–124. 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.12.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Sungkaew S, Stapleton CM, Salamin N, Hodkinson TR. Non-monophyly of the woody bamboos (Bambuseae; Poaceae): a multi-gene region phylogenetic analysis of Bambusoideae s.s. J Plant Res. 2009;122(1):95–108. 10.1007/s10265-008-0192-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Burke SV, Grennan CP, Duvall MR. Plastome sequences of two New World bamboos—Arundinaria gigantea and Cryptochloa strictiflora (Poaceae)—extend phylogenomic understanding of Bambusoideae. Am J Bot. 2012;99(12):1951–1961. 10.3732/ajb.1200365 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Wu FH, Kan DP, Lee SB, Daniell H, Lee YW, Lin CC, et al. Complete nucleotide sequence of Dendrocalamus latiflorus and Bambusa oldhamii chloroplast genomes. Tree Physiol. 2009;29(6):847–856. 10.1093/treephys/tpp015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Zhang YJ, Ma PF, Li DZ. High-throughput sequencing of six bamboo chloroplast genomes: phylogenetic implications for temperate woody bamboos (Poaceae: Bambusoideae). PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e20596 10.1371/journal.pone.0020596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Ma P-F, Zhang Y-X, Guo Z-H, Li D-Z. Evidence for horizontal transfer of mitochondrial DNA to the plastid genome in a bamboo genus. Scientific reports. 2015;5:11608 10.1038/srep11608 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Doyle J, Doyle J. Genomic plant DNA preparation from fresh tissue-CTAB method. Phytochem Bull. 1987;19(11):11–15. [Google Scholar]
- 26. Dong WP, Xu C, Cheng T, Lin K, Zhou SL. Sequencing angiosperm plastid genomes made easy: a complete set of universal primers and a case study on the phylogeny of saxifragales. Genome Biol Evol. 2013;5(5):989–997. 10.1093/gbe/evt063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Wyman SK, Jansen RK, Boore JL. Automatic annotation of organellar genomes with DOGMA. Bioinformatics. 2004;20(17):3252–3255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Lowe TM, Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25(5):0955–0964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Conant GC, Wolfe KH. GenomeVx: simple web-based creation of editable circular chromosome maps. Bioinformatics. 2008;24(6):861–862. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm598 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Yang ZH. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24(8):1586–1591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28(10):2731–2739. 10.1093/molbev/msr121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. APG. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot J Linn Soc. 2009;161(2):105–121. [Google Scholar]
- 33. Jeanmougin F, Thompson JD, Gouy M, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. Multiple sequence alignment with Clustal X. Trends Biochem Sci. 1998;23(10):403–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Rambaut A. Se-Al: sequence alignment editor. ver. 2.0. Available: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/seal/.1996.
- 35. Swofford DL. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and Other Methods), version 4.0. SunderlandMA: Sinauer Associates; 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 36. Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Syst Biol. 2008;57(5):758–771. 10.1080/10635150802429642 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Posada D, Crandall K. Modeltest 3.7. Program distributed by the author Universidad de Vigo, Spain.2005.
- 38. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 2012;61(3):539–542. 10.1093/sysbio/sys029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T, editors. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE); 2010. November 14; San Diego Supercomput. Center, New Orleans, LA. [Google Scholar]
- 40. Drummond AJ, Suchard MA, Xie D, Rambaut A. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol Biol Evol. 2012;29(8):1969–1973. 10.1093/molbev/mss075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Bremer K. Gondwanan evolution of the grass alliance of families (Poales). Evolution. 2002;56(7):1374–1387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Bouchenak-Khelladi Y, Verboom GA, Savolainen V, Hodkinson TR. Biogeography of the grasses (Poaceae): a phylogenetic approach to reveal evolutionary history in geographical space and geological time. Bot J Linn Soc. 2010;162(4):543–557. [Google Scholar]
- 43. Tang L, Zou XH, Achoundong G, Potgieter C, Second G, Zhang DY, et al. Phylogeny and biogeography of the rice tribe (Oryzeae): evidence from combined analysis of 20 chloroplast fragments. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010;54(1):266–277. 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.08.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Olivier J, Otto T, Roddaz M, Antoine P-O, Londoño X, Clark LG. First macrofossil evidence of a pre-Holocene thorny bamboo cf. Guadua (Poaceae: Bambusoideae: Bambuseae: Guaduinae) in south-western Amazonia (Madre de Dios—Peru). Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 2009;153(1–2):1–7. [Google Scholar]
- 45. Brea M, Zucol AF. Guadua zuloagae sp. nov., the first petrified bamboo culm record from the Ituzaingó Formation (Pliocene), Paraná Basin, Argentina. Ann Bot. 2007;100(4):711–723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Guisinger MM, Chumley TW, Kuehl JV, Boore JL, Jansen RK. Implications of the plastid genome sequence of Typha (Typhaceae, Poales) for understanding genome evolution in Poaceae. J Mol Evol. 2010;70(2):149–166. 10.1007/s00239-009-9317-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Doyle JJ, Davis JI, Soreng RJ, Garvin D, Anderson MJ. Chloroplast DNA inversions and the origin of the grass family (Poaceae). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89(16):7722–7726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Davis JI, Soreng RJ. Migration of endpoints of two genes relative to boundaries between regions of the plastid genome in the grass family (Poaceae). Am J Bot. 2010;97(5):874–892. 10.3732/ajb.0900228 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Raubeson LA, Peery R, Chumley TW, Dziubek C, Fourcade HM, Boore JL, et al. Comparative chloroplast genomics: analyses including new sequences from the angiosperms Nuphar advena and Ranunculus macranthus . BMC Genomics. 2007;8:174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Soderstrom TR, Calderon CE. A commentary on the bamboos (Poaceae: Bambusoideae). Biotropica. 1979;11:161–172. [Google Scholar]
- 51. Das M, Bhattacharya S, Singh P, Filgueiras TS, Pal A. Bamboo taxonomy and diversity in the era of molecular markers. Adv Bot Res. 2008;47:225–268. [Google Scholar]
- 52. Bouchenak-Khelladi Y, Salamin N, Savolainen V, Forest F, van der Bank M, Chase MW, et al. Large multi-gene phylogenetic trees of the grasses (Poaceae): progress towards complete tribal and generic level sampling. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008;47(2):488–505. 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.01.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Triplett JK, Clark LG, Fisher AE, Wen J. Independent allopolyploidization events preceded speciation in the temperate and tropical woody bamboos. New Phytol. 2014;204(1):66–73. 10.1111/nph.12988 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Tomoko O. Synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions in mammalian genes and the nearly neutral theory. J Mol Evol. 1995;40(1):56–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. McInerney JO. The causes of protein evolutionary rate variation. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006;21(5):230–232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Guisinger MM, Kuehl JV, Boore JL, Jansen RK. Genome-wide analyses of Geraniaceae plastid DNA reveal unprecedented patterns of increased nucleotide substitutions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(47):18424–18429. 10.1073/pnas.0806759105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Morton BR. Codon use and the rate of divergence of land plant chloroplast genes. Mol Biol Evol. 1994;11(2):231–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Gaut BS, Muse SV, Clegg MT. Relative rates of nucleotide substitution in the chloroplast genome. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1993;2(2):89–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Gaut BS, Clark LG, Wendel JF, Muse SV. Comparisons of the molecular evolutionary process at rbcL and ndhF in the grass family (Poaceae). Mol Biol Evol. 1997;14(7):769–777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Kelchner SA, Clark L, Cortés G, Oliveira RP, Dransfield S, Filgueiras T, et al. Higher level phylogenetic relationships within the bamboos (Poaceae: Bambusoideae) based on five plastid markers. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013;67(2):404–413. 10.1016/j.ympev.2013.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Judziewicz EJ, Clark LG, Londono X, Stern MJ.American bamboos. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 62. Smith SA, Donoghue MJ. Rates of molecular evolution are linked to life history in flowering plants. Science. 2008;322(5898):86–89. 10.1126/science.1163197 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Smith SA, Beaulieu JM. Life history influences rates of climatic niche evolution in flowering plants. Proc Biol Sci. 2009;276(1677):4345–4352. 10.1098/rspb.2009.1176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Bromham L, Penny D, Rambaut A, Hendy MD. The power of relative rates tests depends on the data. J Mol Evol. 2000;50(3):296–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Bortiri E, Coleman-Derr D, Lazo GR, Anderson OD, Gu YQ. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Brachypodium distachyon: sequence comparison and phylogenetic analysis of eight grass plastomes. BMC Res Notes. 2008;1(1):61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Vicentini A, Barber JC, Aliscioni SS, Giussani LM, Kellogg EA. The age of the grasses and clusters of origins of C4 photosynthesis. Glob Chang Biol. 2008;14(12):2963–2977. [Google Scholar]
- 67. Ruiz-Sanchez E. Biogeography and divergence time estimates of woody bamboos: insights in the evolution of neotropical bamboos. Bol Soc Bot Mex. 2011;88:67–75. [Google Scholar]
- 68. Burke SV, Clark LG, Triplett JK, Grennan CP, Duvall MR. Biogeography and phylogenomics of New World Bambusoideae (Poaceae), revisited. Am J Bot. 2014;101(5):886–891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Wang L, Jacques FMB, Su T, Xing YW, Zhang ST, Zhou ZK. The earliest fossil bamboos of China (middle Miocene, Yunnan) and their biogeographical importance. Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 2013;197:253–265. [Google Scholar]
- 70. Worobiec E, Worobiec G, Gedl P. Occurrence of fossil bamboo pollen and a fungal conidium of Tetraploa cf.aristata in Upper Miocene deposits of Józefina (Poland). Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 2009;157(3):211–217. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The nucleotide sequence of G. angustifolia has been dposited in GenBank (Accession number: KM365071).