Skip to main content
Regenerative Biomaterials logoLink to Regenerative Biomaterials
. 2015 Aug 17;2(3):187–195. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbv010

Two competitive nucleation mechanisms of calcium carbonate biomineralization in response to surface functionality in low calcium ion concentration solution

Hua Deng 1,2,, Shuo Wang 1,, Xiumei Wang 1,*, Chang Du 3, Xingcan Shen 4, Yingjun Wang 3, Fuzhai Cui 1,*
PMCID: PMC4669016  PMID: 26814639

Abstract

Four self-assembled monolayer surfaces terminated with –COOH, –OH, –NH2 and –CH3 functional groups are used to direct the biomineralization processes of calcium carbonate (CaCO3) in low Ca2+ concentration, and the mechanism of nucleation and initial crystallization within 12 h was further explored. On −COOH surface, nucleation occurs mainly via ion aggregation mechanism while prenucleation ions clusters may be also involved. On −OH and −NH2 surfaces, however, nucleation forms via calcium carbonate clusters, which aggregate in solution and then are adsorbed onto surfaces following with nucleation of amorphous calcium carbonate (ACC). Furthermore, strongly negative-charged −COOH surface facilitates the direct formation of calcites, and the −OH and −NH2 surfaces determine the formation of vaterites with preferred crystalline orientations. Neither ACC nor crystalline CaCO3 is observed on −CH3 surface. Our findings present a valuable model to understand the CaCO3 biomineralization pathway in natural system where functional groups composition plays a determining role during calcium carbonate crystallization.

Keywords: calcium carbonate, biomineralization, self-assembled monolayer, prenucleation clusters, ions adsorption

Introduction

As the most abundant biomineral in nature [1], calcium carbonate usually has astonishing morphologies and structures, such as calcite single crystals in ophiocomid brittlestars [2] and sea urchin spine [3, 4], vaterite in freshwater lackluster pearls [5], biogenic aragonite in mollusk [6, 7], and amorphous calcium carbonate (ACC) in molt of armadillidium vulgare [8]. What are the underlying nucleation and crystallization mechanisms of their formation? This is the key question to clarify the pathway of CaCO3 formation in natural system [9–11].

Two nucleation mechanisms have been successively proposed. The first one is classical nucleation theory that assumes crystals nucleate and grow via ion adsorption [12, 13]. The other one was proposed recently that CaCO3 biominerals can be formed via stable prenucleation-stage clusters with aggregation into ACC phase by colliding and coalescing and then transforming to a crystal phase [11]. The precritical clusters were confirmed under a stearic acid monolayer using cryotransmission electron microscopy (TEM) by Pouget et al. [10]. These two theories appear to be contradictory and many details remain ambiguous [14, 15]. Notably, the impurity-free picoliter droplet arrays were used to study crystal growth in spatially and chemically controlled, finite-reservoir environments. These confined volumes significantly slow CaCO3 crystallization proceeds, facilitating observation of ACC during crystallization progresses [16].

Another key point of CaCO3 biomineralization is ACC, from which the crystalline phase is transformed [17, 18]. The pure form of ACC is highly unstable while ACC in organisms usually contains many additives, including polyphosphonates, amino acid, oligosaccharide and propylene glycol [19]. Rodriguez-Blanco et al. [20] investigated the kinetics and mechanisms of ACC crystallization to calcite via vaterite. All these findings show a profile of CaCO3 biomineralization, whereas many details remain unclear. For instance, what is the determinant of the anchoring location of ACC particles and what is the controlling factor of crystallization from ACC? The additives existing in natural ACC are believed to play a complex role on transformation of ACC into crystalline phase. While how the whole procedure is achieved?

To figure out these details, we prepared a two-dimensional biomimetic surface by self-assembling of alkanethiols on gold [21, 22]. Alkanethiols are terminated with −COOH, −OH, −NH2 and −CH3, which are the most common components of various natural substances involved in biomineralization, including amino acid [23], protein [24, 25], collagen [26, 27], etc. By imitating these biomaterials at molecular level, it is hoped that CaCO3 crystallization on theses biomimetic surfaces can bring us deep insight in CaCO3 nucleation and crystallization details in living organisms. Previously, we examined the CaCO3 crystallizations on different self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) after 12, 24 and 36h of incubation in low, medium and high Ca2+ concentrations of solutions, which indicated that nucleation and crystallization were completed within 12 h and the crystalline phase, size and shape could be modulated by surface chemistries and calcium ion concentrations [28]. In this study, we therefore investigated the detailed CaCO3 nucleation mechanisms and crystallization pathway occurred within 12 h in low Ca2+ concentration.

Materials and Methods

Biomimetic surfaces

Four types of biomimetic surfaces are prepared by a well-developed technology, alkanethiols self-assembling on gold (111) [23]. Water contact angle measurement, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and atomic force microscope were utilized to characterize the self-assembled surfaces, which indicated that the SAMs of alkanethiols terminated with different functional groups had similar packing density, as described in our previous reports [28, 29]. The zeta potentials of different surfaces were measured using SurPass Electrokinetic Analyzer (Anton Paar, Austria) in saline background solution at pH 7.4. Because a monovalent cation solution is necessary for calculation in the system, saline was applied instead of CaCl2 solution. Eight experimental points were collected for each surface.

Experimental set-up

The surfaces fixed in a plastic framework were placed upside-down in 1 mM CaCl2 solution in a beaker at room temperature. As shown in Fig. 1, the depth was about 1 cm from aqueous surface. The beaker was placed in a closed desiccator containing vials of ammonium carbonate (approximately 5.0 g). The use of (NH4)2CO3 helps to produce CO2 and maintain constant pH in the solution [30]. To monitor the concentration of free Ca2+ near the biomimetic surfaces, a calcium ion selective electrode (Shanghai Sassin, China) is placed as close as possible to the surfaces and the data are recorded by software named Measurement Program-500 (MP-500, Shanghai Sassin, China). The electrode was calibrated utilizing 0.01 mM and 1 mM CaCl2 solution successively before every measurement. To minimize contamination of SAMs, the substrates were placed into CaCl2 solution immediately after cleaning with triple-distilled water. Low concentration of CaCl2 was utilized here to mimic the biomineralization process in nature as far as possible, which was different with previous reports [30–32]. Our previous study [28] demonstrated that CaCO3 crystallization was directed by functional groups in low concentration of Ca2+ solution whereas nonspecific precipitation occurred in high Ca2+ concentration solution.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Schematic drawing of experimental equipment. CO2 produced by (NH4)2CO3 decomposition diffuses into the solution and reacts with CaCl2. The calcium ion selective electrode is placed around the biomimetic surfaces.

Characterizations on biomineralized surfaces

Biomimetic surfaces were taken out after crystallization for 15 min, 0.5, 1, 3 and 12 h, followed by slight washing for 2–3 times. The surfaces are then immediately placed and dried in nitrogen atmosphere. CaCO3 depositions formed on biomimetic surfaces were analyzed in situ utilizing X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscope (SEM) and attenuated total reflectance of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR). Notably, exposure of CaCO3 sample in air should be as short as possible and characterized straight away because the pure ACC particles are only stable for a short time in specific conditions and inclined to transform to stable crystal phase [10, 33]. XRD was carried out on D/max 2500 (Rigaku, Japan) with Cu Kα1 radiation (λ = 0.1541 nm) at room temperature. The 2θ ranged from 15° to 75° and XRD profile was recorded in step-scan intervals of 0.02° at a scanning speed of 6.0°/min at 40 kV and 200 mA. SEM images were carried out on S-4500 (Hitachi, Japan) with an accelerating voltage of 15 kV. The ATR-FTIR spectra were collected on Spectrum 400 (PE, USA) with the wavelength range 650–4000 cm1. The samples were pressed against a Ge prism tip at the focal position to obtain the spectrum, and 16 scans were collected at a resolution of 4 cm1.

Results

Developments of Ca2+ concentration around four types of surfaces

The changes of free Ca2+ concentration around four surfaces are shown in Fig. 2. Two distinct trends are observed. Around −COOH surface, a sharp increase occurs once the surface is immersed into solution. At about 30 min, Ca2+ concentration is the highest, approximately five times more than initial concentration. Then, a slow decrease takes place with a growing gradient. The Ca2+ concentration reaches the lowest and maintains constant after 50 min. Changes of Ca2+ concentration around −OH, −NH2 and −CH3 surfaces are similar. A slow increase with a growing gradient occurs and was followed by a fast decrease with a reducing gradient. The zeta potential of −COOH and −OH surfaces at pH ∼ 7.4 was −28.3 ± 4.8 and −19.8 ± 1.0 mV, respectively, which indicated that the two types of surfaces generated negative charges through ionization in solution. In contrast, the zeta potential of the −NH2 surfaces was 1.4 ± 0.2 mV indicating the positively charged surfaces. Besides, it is noted that the −CH3 surface also showed negative zeta potential (−15.2 ± 3.5 mV) at the neutral solution. This suggested that the methyl-terminated surface preferentially adsorbed negative ions because cations are more easily hydrated and retained in solution, which was consistent with previous studies [34]. This is probably why the calcium concentration near the −CH3 surfaces was a little bit higher than that near the −NH2 surfaces during the first 30 min in Fig. 2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Development of Ca2+ concentration over time measured by calcium ion selective electrode. Curves of Ca2+ concentration around four functional group surfaces are shown. The data are present as average ± SD.

The initial concentration of free calcium ion is 1 mM, as shown by the black dotted line. Once the −COOH substrates were placed into solution, a sharp increase of [Ca2+] occurred within the first 15 min because of the strongly negative-charged surfaces, which implied the free Ca2+ in solution were moving toward −COOH surface, symbolizing the quick aggregation of calcium ions via electrostatic adsorption. Whereas only extremely slow increases of [Ca2+] near −OH, −NH2 and −CH3 surfaces were observed initially because the weak negative potentials of −OH and −CH3 surfaces comparing with −COOH surface contributed to the slow aggregation of calcium. After that, with carbon dioxide being generated and dissolving into upper solution gradually, calcium ions were consumed to form carbonate and osmosis pressure in upper solution decreased. To balance this change, the calcium ions in middle and bottom of solution moved to upper area, causing a slow increase of calcium ion around substrates after 20 min. Besides, although −NH2 surface had a positive potential, the curve of Ca2+ changes over time was similar with −OH and −CH3 surfaces indicating the carbonate ions formed in upper solution dominated the aggregation of calcium cations instead of the negative charges of the substrate surfaces.

Nucleation and evolution of CaCO3 crystallization on −COOH surface

Nucleation and crystallization of CaCO3 on −COOH surface after 15, 30 min, 1, 3 and 12 h of reaction were examined by SEM, XRD and FTIR, as shown in Figs. 3 and 4. After 15 min of reaction, CaCO3 nanoparticles ranged from tens of nanometers to about 100 nm were observed on −COOH surface, as shown in Fig. 3f. It is very interesting that these small CaCO3 nanoparticles integrate together and merge with each other to form the droplet-shaped CaCO3 nanoparticles with larger size. The sizes of these CaCO3 nanoparticles range from 100 to 800 nm and then seem to flow and grow larger by coalescing, until a critical size is reached, as indicated by black arrows in Fig. 3f. After nucleation, the CaCO3 nanoparticles gradually transform into crystals, as shown in the Fig. 3a–e. Considering the sharp increase of Ca2+ concentration near the −COOH surface initially, calcium ion adsorption onto −COOH surface should be also occurred in the meanwhile Ca2+ and CO32 aggregate together forming prenucleation clusters once enough CO32 formed in solution. Because it takes time for CO32 formation in solution, CaCO3 cluster formation was slowed down that makes the classical ions accumulation mechanism reasonable in our case. After that, these clusters can also be adsorbed and gathered onto the strongly negatively charged −COOH surface.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

SEM images of CaCO3 formed on −COOH surface after (a) 15 min, (b) 30 min, (c) 1 h, (d) 3 h and (e) 12 h of crystallization. (f) High-magnification image of (a). CaCO3 nanoparticles covered the surface (black circle in (f)) and grow larger by aggregation until a critical size is reached forming regular edges (circles in (a) and (b)). Spheroidic CaCO3 phases are observed and some calcite rhombohedra are formed at 3 h (black circles in (d)). After crystallization for 12 h, oriented calcite rhombohedra are formed.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

XRD patterns (a) and FTIR-ATR spectra (b) of CaCO3 formed on −COOH surface at 15, 30 min, 1, 3 and 12 h. C, calcite; V, vaterite.

XRD examinations showed that no obvious strong peak was observed in XRD at 15 min, indicating the CaCO3 nanoparticles are mostly ACC. Calcite rhombohedra with oriented (104) were formed under the control of −COOH surface while vaterite phase was also observed. In the following several hours, diffraction peaks of (200) and (111) crystal faces of vaterite are detected by XRD, as indicated in Fig. 4a. This is in accordance with the involvement of ACC nanoparticle-based crystallization. Previous studies have shown that ACC nanoparticles formed in solution are adsorbed to the upper layer of calcite formed at initial stage, and finally transformed to calcite via vaterite [3, 10, 35].

This CaCO3 crystallization pathway is also confirmed by ATR-FTIR spectra (Fig. 4b). A wide band (νs) at 1415 cm1 is collected at 15 min, which is overlapping with the peak at 1475 cm1 at 30 min. The intensive band (νs) at 1422 cm1 is collected at 1 h that gradually shifts to 1453 cm1 after 3 h. Simultaneously, a peak (γ) at 876 cm1 is observed with an increasing absorbency over time. Previous reports [36–40] show that double bands at 1475 and 1415 cm1 of ACC are attributed to stretching vibrations of carbonate ion while peak at 866 cm1 is attributed to bending vibrations of carbonate ion. The typical peaks for calcite and vaterite are listed in Table 1. The wide and overlapping band at 1475 and 1415 cm1 indicates existence of ACC until 30 min. The peaks at 1422 and 876 cm1 suggest that calcite is gradually formed. Almost identical peaks are collected at 3 and 12 h, suggesting crystallization has almost completed, in accordance with SEM results.

Table 1.

Typical peaks and attribution of FTIR spectra for calcite and vaterite

Calcite (cm−1) Vaterite (cm−1) Attribution
1421 1421 Asymmetric stretching of CO32−s)
1082 1082 Symmetric stretching of CO32−as)
876 870 Out-of-plane deformation of CO32− (γ)
713 750 In-plane deformation of CO32− (δ)

Evolution of CaCO3 crystallization on −OH and −NH2 surfaces

The initial stages of CaCO3 crystallization pathways on −OH and −NH2 surfaces are almost identical. The typical SEM, XRD and FTIR results are shown in Figs. 5 and 6. At 15 min, no diffraction peak in XRD pattern was observed demonstrating the formation of ACC nanoparticles. SEM images indicated that these ACC nanoparticles were about 60 ± 20 nm that probably formed through aggregation of clusters via prenucleation clusters mechanism [10, 11, 14–16, 41, 42]. The size of particles reached 0.95 ± 0.35 μm after reaction for 30 min. In the following hours, ACC particles continuously aggregate and finally form vaterite. ATR-FTIR spectra of CaCO3 formed on biomimetic surfaces also demonstrate a clear pathway for vaterite formation via ACC transformation. As shown in Fig. 5, ACC is formed at initial stage and transformed to vaterite gradually. Oriented (111) and (200) growth of vaterite are observed on −OH and −NH2 surfaces, respectively. In ATR-FTIR spectra, the wide band at 1421 cm1 is attributed to νs of ACC whereas the intensive peaks at 1422 and at 871 cm1 are typical peaks of vaterite.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

typical SEM images of CaCO3 formed on (a) −OH and (b) −NH2 surfaces at 15, 30 min, 1, 3 and 12 h. ACC nanoparticles with 60 ± 20 nm in diameter are adsorbed onto surfaces as nuclei, which are probably formed through aggregation of clusters. Crystallization occurs among ACC particles and propagates orientedly. Spindle-shaped vaterites are formed on −OH surface and spheroidic vaterite on −NH2 surface.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

XRD patterns and FTIR-ATR spectra of CaCO3 formed on −OH (a1, a2) and −NH2 (b1, b2) surfaces at 15, 30 min, 1, 3 and 12 h. C, calcite; V, vaterite.

Although the −OH surface is negatively charged, the ability of Ca2+ adsorption is only a little bit higher than −NH2 surface and is much lower than −COOH surface in the first 30 min according to Fig. 2. The similar initial stages of biomineralization on −OH and −NH2 surfaces indicated that negative charge of −OH group has little effect on calcium ion absorption and nucleation of calcium carbonate. Although the −CH3 substrate generated negative potential, CaCO3 crystals formed in solution around the surfaces had no strong affinity with methyl-terminated surfaces. Therefore no nucleation occurs on −CH3 surface because of its high hydrophobicity and neutral surface, which has been used as the crystallization-inhibited functional group [43, 44].

Discussion

In calcium carbonate biomineralization, the nucleation mechanisms still remain debated so far. The key controversial question is the existence conditions of Ca2+ ions before nucleation, which are preferentially adsorbed and aggregate onto surfaces or form ions clusters with CO32 in solution?

According to our studies, these two pathways should probably exist on −COOH surface competitively dominating the biomineralization process by the winning mechanism. Evidences from Ca2+ concentration development and SEM results suggest that the classical nucleation by addition of ions is also involved on −COOH surface. In the early stage of biomineralization, the strongly negative charges of carboxyl groups adsorb calcium ions via electrostatic interactions, which contribute to the instant increase of Ca2+ concentration near the −COOH surfaces within the first 30 min. In the area far from the surfaces, the calcium ions could not feel the attractions of negative-charged template, whereas in the area near the surfaces, the Ca2+ concentrations are obviously higher than the initial concentration of as-prepared solution because of the aggregations of calcium ions. In this study, the terminated −COOH groups of SAMs we used as template have the closed-packed pattern consisting of the (√3 × √3) R30° structure unit with theoretical area density of 7.68 × 106 mol m2 [12]. Therefore, the saturated surface density of calcium ions adsorbed on −COOH surfaces is ∼106 mol m2. According to Fig. 2, the Ca2+ concentration near the −COOH surfaces is approximately 4 mM after crystallization for 15 min, indicating the surface density of Ca2+ in solution is 7.92 × 1010 mol m2 (taken radius of Ca2+ as 0.99 Å). Therefore, we could estimate that Ca2+ concentration on the −COOH surfaces is much higher than that near the surfaces in low calcium Ca2+ concentrations of solutions. In this study, it takes time to accumulate enough CO32 in solution for biomineralization. Especially in low calcium ion concentration, localized calcium ions on periodically arranged −COOH groups ion with high surface density would undergo nucleation through ion adsorption mechanism in the early stage. These Ca2+ contribute to form oriented crystalline phase, in accordance with oriented (104) calcite from XRD analysis, which has also been reported by Tremel et al. [31]. Simultaneously, with the accumulation of Ca2+ and CO32 near the surfaces, electrostatic interaction and Brownian motion of these positive and negative ions facilitate the formation of prenucleation clusters leading to a new pathway for CaCO3 biomineralization based on cluster-based mechanism.

On −OH and −NH2 surfaces, the curves of Ca2+ concentration development over time are quite different with −COOH group, indicating the week adsorption of Ca2+ with the chemical groups of −OH and −NH2. Therefore, the CaCO3 clusters formed near the surfaces via Brownian motion and electrostatic interaction of Ca2+ and CO32 in solution will dominate the biomineralization process. Furthermore, crystalline propagation of CaCO3 on −OH and −NH2 groups was also observed. In our study, crystalline domains begin to develop on −OH and −NH2 surfaces once the CaCO3 nanoparticles are absorbed onto biomimetic surfaces. Ions at the interface rearrange to form crystalline domain due to the interaction with functional groups of the biomimetic surface. This will guide the rearrangement of the neighboring ions so that crystallization can ‘transmit’. In another word, along with the growth of CaCO3 nanoparticles, crystalline domains propagate gradually via oriented secondary nucleation within CaCO3 nanoparticles [9]. The involved mechanism may be also hierarchical self-assembling or dissolution and reprecipitation [24, 45–48]. Figure 7 shows the layer-by-layer model for coalescence of CaCO3 nanoparticles and propagation of crystalline phase, as the traces of hierarchical self-assembling mechanism. The thermodynamic cue may be that specific plane of crystalline CaCO3 phase is favored because the free-energy barrier is decreased owing to the properties of functional groups, i.e. wettability, polarity, electric charge and pattern. This has been extensively discussed by Tremel et al. [31, 49] and by Aizenberg et al. [30, 42]. These procedures suggest that crystallization originates from the biomimetic surface and spreads from internal to external space of CaCO3 particles directed by functional groups.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

The layer-by-layer growth model of CaCO3 on −OH surface. Coalescence of CaCO3 nanoparticles in circles demonstrates that crystallization propagates layer-by-layer.

After reaction for about 1 h, vaterites formed on −OH and −NH2 surfaces gradually exhibit distinct morphologies and orientation, which is caused by secondary nucleation among CaCO3 nanoparticles (Fig. 8). On −OH surface, CaCO3 nanoparticles nucleate toward two opposite directions and form spindle-shaped vaterite at last and orientation of (111) is preferred. On −NH2 surface, however, no oriented nucleation of CaCO3 nanoparticles is observed and crystallization spreads around. As a result, spheroidic vaterite is formed with favored (200) orientation. This can be explained by the ambiguity in the precise orientation of the headgroups and uncertainty in the order of the outer part of the SAM [30]. The terminal groups are free to rotate around the Cn-X bond, and are capable of interacting with each other. As shown in Fig. 8, for −NH2 terminated surface, rotation ω leads to uncertainty in the order of the outer part of the surface. In consequence, direction of secondary nucleation among CaCO3 nanoparticles is uncertain. However, the order of the outer part of the −OH surface is fixed owing to the hydrogen bond. The secondary nucleation among CaCO3 nanoparticles takes place toward two opposite directions.

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

propagation of crystallization via secondary nucleation among CaCO3 nanoparticles. SEM morphologies of spheroidic vaterite on −NH2 surface (a1) and spindle-shaped vaterites on −OH surface (b1). (a2, b2) Geometry of headgroups of −NH2 and −OH surfaces. −NH2 is free to rotate around C11-N axis, as presented by ω. Rotation around C11-N axis of −OH group has no effect on the order of the outer part of the surface. Hydrogen atom can interact with neighboring oxygen atom to form hydrogen bond. The dotted line in (b2) presents the arranged oxygen atoms in line and the arrow presents the direction of the second nucleation among CaCO3 nanoparticles.

Weiner and Addadi [9] have introduced a hypothetical pathway in a sea urchin spicule about how the crystallization propagates by secondary nucleation among ACC particles. In our study, TEM images provide direct evidences that vaterites with different morphologies and orientations are formed via the oriented secondary nucleation among CaCO3 nanoparticles. CaCO3 nanoparticles formed on −OH surfaces have the size ranged from 60 to 80 nm, extremely similar with that in a sea urchin spicule. Morphologies and shapes of CaCO3 nanoparticles suggest the directed and oriented coalescences, i.e. the oriented secondary nucleation of CaCO3 nanoparticles functions as a key strategy of vaterite formation.

Conclusion

The present study presents a clear CaCO3 biomineralization pathway by introducing biomimetic surfaces terminated with four types of common functional groups in nature. Ion adsorption mechanism is proved to be reasonable on strongly negative-charged −COOH surface in low calcium condition. In most instances, biomineralization occurs via stable prenucleation clusters. In natural system, various functional groups should play a compositive role on CaCO3 crystallization and the electrostatic interaction of −COOH surface may be eliminated due to the low percentage of composition and the irregular arrangement of −COOH groups. As a result, CaCO3 nucleation tends to be cluster-based and crystallization propagates mainly via secondary nucleation among ACC nanoparticles, which is similar with that on −OH and −NH2 surfaces. Also, our findings supply direct evidence for the secondary nucleation among ACC particles by which the crystallization propagates in natural system. The functional groups play a fundamental but complicated role on morphology and orientation of crystals. Our findings will be helpful for understanding and mimicking the role of various natural biomaterials on CaCO3 biomineralization from molecular level.

Acknowledgements

This study is partly supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21371106, 21161003), the ‘Twelfth Five-Year’ National Technology Support Program (No. 2012BAI17B02), Guangxi Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 2012GXNSFDA053007, 2011GXNSFA018044), the New Century National Hundred, Thousand and Ten Thousand Talent Project of Guangxi, and State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base for the Chemistry and Molecular Engineering of Medicinal Resources (No. CMEMR2012-A12).

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.

References

  • 1.Dey A, de With G, Sommerdijk N. In situ techniques in biomimetic mineralization studies of calcium carbonate. Chem Soc Rev 2010;39:397–409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Aizenberg J, Tkachenko A, Weiner S, et al. Calcitic microlenses as part of the photoreceptor system in brittlestars. Nature 2001;412:819–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Politi Y, Arad T, Klein E, et al. Sea urchin spine calcite forms via a transient amorphous calcium carbonate phase. Science 2004;306:1161–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Politi Y, Metzler RA, Abrecht M, et al. Transformation mechanism of amorphous calcium carbonate into calcite in the sea urchin larval spicule. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105:17362–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Qiao L, Feng QL, Li Z. Special vaterite found in freshwater lackluster pearls. Cryst Growth Des 2007;7:275–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pokroy B, Fitch AN, Lee PL, et al. Anisotropic lattice distortions in the mollusk-made aragonite: a widespread phenomenon. J Struct Biol 2006;153:145–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pokroy B, Fieramosca JS, Von Dreele RB, et al. Atomic structure of biogenic aragonite. Chem Mater 2007;19:3244–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tao JH, Zhou DM, Zhang ZS, et al. Magnesium-aspartate-based crystallization switch inspired from shell molt of crustacean. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:22096–101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Weiner S, Addadi L. Crystallization pathways in biomineralization. Annu Rev Mater Res 2011;41:21–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pouget EM, Bomans PHH, Goos JACM, et al. The initial stages of template-controlled CaCO3 formation revealed by cryo-TEM. Science 2009;323:1455–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gebauer D, Völkel A, Cölfen H. Stable prenucleation calcium carbonate clusters. Science 2008;322:1819–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mann S, Heywood BR, Rajam S, et al. Controlled crystallization of CaCO3 under stearic acid monolayers. Nature 1988;334:692–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cölfen H, Mann S. Higher-order organization by mesoscale self-assembly and transformation of hybrid nanostructures. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2003;42:2350–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Meldrum FC, Sear RP. Now you see them. Science 2008;322:1802–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cölfen H. Biomineralization: a crystal-clear view. Nat Mater 2010;9:960–1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Stephens CJ, Kim YY, Evans SD, et al. Early stages of crystallization of calcium carbonate revealed in picoliter droplets. J Am Chem Soc 2011;133:5210–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Weiss IM, Tuross N, Addadi L, et al. Mollusc larval shell formation: amorphous calcium carbonate is a precursor phase for aragonite. J Exp Zool 2002;293:478–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Radha A, Forbes TZ, Killian CE, et al. Transformation and crystallization energetics of synthetic and biogenic amorphous calcium carbonate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:16438–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Addadi L, Raz S, Weiner S. Taking advantage of disorder: amorphous calcium carbonate and its roles in biomineralization. Adv Mater 2003;15:959–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rodriguez-Blanco JD, Shaw S, Benning LG. The kinetics and mechanisms of amorphous calcium carbonate (ACC) crystallization to calcite, via vaterite. Nanoscale 2011;3:265–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Schreiber F. Structure and growth of self-assembling monolayers. Prog Surf Sci 2000;65:151–257. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sellers H, Ulman A, Shnidman Y, et al. Structure and binding of alkanethiolates on gold and silver surfaces: implications for self-assembled monolayers. J Am Chem Soc 1993;115:9389–401. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tong H, Ma WT, Wang LL, et al. Control over the crystal phase, shape, size and aggregation of calcium carbonate via a L-aspartic acid inducing process. Biomaterials 2004;25:3923–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Dickerson MB, Sandhage KH, Naik RR. Protein- and peptide-directed syntheses of inorganic materials. Chem Rev 2008;108:4935–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Suzuki M, Saruwatari K, Kogure T, et al. An acidic matrix protein, Pif, is a key macromolecule for nacre formation. Science 2009;325:1388–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhang W, Liao SS, Cui FZ. Hierarchical self-assembly of nano-fibrils in mineralized collagen. Chem Mater 2003;15:3221–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nudelman F, Pieterse K, George A, et al. The role of collagen in bone apatite formation in the presence of hydroxyapatite nucleation inhibitors. Nat Mater 2010;9:1004–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Deng H, Wang XM, Du C, et al. Combined effect of ion concentration and functional groups on surface chemistry modulated CaCO3 crystallization. CrystEngComm 2012;14:6647–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Deng H, Shen XC, Wang XM, et al. Calcium carbonate crystallization controlled by functional groups: a mini-review. Front Mater Sci 2013;7:62–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Aizenberg J, Black AJ, Whitesides GM. Oriented growth of calcite controlled by self-assembled monolayers of functionalized alkanethiols supported on gold and silver. J Am Chem Soc 1999;121:4500–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kuther J, Seshadri R, Knoll W, et al. Templated growth of calcite, vaterite and aragonite crystals on self-assembled monolayers of substituted alkylthiols on gold. J Mater Chem 1998;8:641–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ren D, Li Z, Gao Y, et al. Effects of functional groups and soluble matrices in fish otolith on calcium carbonate mineralization. Biomed Mater 2010;5:055009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wolf SE, Leiterer J, Kappl M, et al. Early homogenous amorphous precursor stages of calcium carbonate and subsequent crystal growth in levitated droplets. J Am Chem Soc 2008;130:12342–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Shyue JJ, De Guire MR. Acid-base properties and zeta potentials of self-assembled monolayers obtained via in situ transformations. Langmuir 2004;20:8693–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Xu XR, Cai AH, Liu R, et al. The roles of water and polyelectrolytes in the phase transformation of amorphous calcium carbonate. J Cryst Growth 2008;310:3779–87. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Andersen FA, Brecevic L. Infrared spectra of amorphous and crystalline calcium carbonate. Acta Chem Scand 1991;45:1018–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fleet ME. Infrared spectra of carbonate apatites: ν2-Region bands. Biomaterials 2009;30:1473–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gal A, Weiner S, Addadi L. The stabilizing effect of silicate on biogenic and synthetic amorphous calcium carbonate. J Am Chem Soc 2010;132:13208–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hu YL, Ma YJ, Zhou Y, et al. Hen eggwhite-mediated stack crystallization of calcium carbonate. J Cryst Growth 2010;312:831–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dlapa P, Bodí MB, Mataix-Solera J, et al. FT-IR spectroscopy reveals that ash water repellency is highly dependent on ash chemical composition. Catena 2013;108:35–43. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Raiteri P, Gale JD. Water is the key to nonclassical nucleation of amorphous calcium carbonate. J Am Chem Soc 2010;132:17623–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Aziz B, Gebauer D, Hedin N. Kinetic control of particle-mediated calcium carbonate crystallization. CrystEngComm 2011;13:4641–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Aizenberg J, Black AJ, Whitesides GM. Control of crystal nucleation by patterned self-assembled monolayers. Nature 1999;398:495–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Aizenberg J. Crystallization in patterns: a bio-inspired approach. Adv Mater 2004;16:1295–1302. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Liu ZH, Dreybrod W. Dissolution kinetics of calcium carbonate minerals in H2O-CO2 solutions in turbulent flow: the role of the diffusion boundary layer and the slow reaction H2O + CO2 → H + + HCO3. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 1997;61:2879–89. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.De Yoreo JJ, Vekilov PG. Principles of crystal nucleation and growth. Rev Mineral Geochem 2003;54:57–93. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Meldrum FC, Cölfen H. Controlling mineral morphologies and structures in biological and synthetic systems. Chem Rev 2008;108:4332–432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Fang PA, Conway JF, Margolis HC, et al. Hierarchical self-assembly of amelogenin and the regulation of biomineralization at the nanoscale. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108:14097–102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Küther J, Tremel W. Template induced crystallization of biominerals on self-assembled monolayers of alkylthiols. Thin Solid Films 1998;327:554–8. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Regenerative Biomaterials are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES