Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2015 Oct 2;24(1):499–507. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2948-6

SIADH-related hyponatremia in hospital day care units: clinical experience and management with tolvaptan

Ramón De las Peñas 1,✉,#, Santiago Ponce 2,#, Fernando Henao 3, Carlos Camps Herrero 4, Enric Carcereny 5, Yolanda Escobar Álvarez 6, César A Rodríguez 7, Juan Antonio Virizuela 3, Rafael López López 8
PMCID: PMC4669367  PMID: 26431960

Abstract

Hyponatremia (Na ˂135 mmol/l) is the most frequent electrolyte disorder in clinical practice, and the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH) is the commonest cause of hyponatremia in cancer patients. Correcting hyponatremia in these patients can reduce morbidity and mortality, increase the response to anti-cancer agents, and help reduce hospital length of stay and costs. Tolvaptan is an oral medication used to treat SIADH-related hyponatremia patients that needs to be initiated at hospital so patients can have their serum sodium monitored. If tolvaptan could be initiated in hospital day care units (DCUs), performing the same tests, hospitalization could be avoided, quality of life improved, and costs reduced. This is the first publication where a panel of oncologists are sharing their experience and making some recommendations with the use of tolvaptan to treat SIADH-related hyponatremia in DCU after collecting and examining 35 clinical cases with these type of patients. The conclusion from this retrospective observational analysis is that the use of tolvaptan in DCU is safe and effective in the therapeutic management of SIADH-related hyponatremia.

Keywords: Antidiuretic hormone receptor antagonists, Day care units, Hyponatremia, Inappropriate ADH syndrome, Tolvaptan

Introduction

Hyponatremia (Na <135 mmol/l) is the most common electrolyte disorder in clinical practice, affecting around 15–28 % of hospitalized patients [1] and occurring in up to 44 % in certain cancers, such as small cell lung cancer (SCLC) [2]. The most frequent cause of hyponatremia in the hospital setting is the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH) [3]. SIADH is also the commonest cause of hyponatremia in cancer patients, representing around 30 % of the total [4].

Hyponatremia is associated with high morbidity and mortality [5, 6] and poorer response to anti-cancer agents [2]. It causes longer hospital length of stay and increases medical costs [68].

Tolvaptan is an oral treatment indicated for adult patients with hyponatremia secondary to SIADH [9]. This is the first publication about the use of tolvaptan in hospital day care unit (DCU).

Definition, classification, and diagnosis of hyponatremia

Hyponatremia is defined as a serum sodium concentration below 135 mmol/l. It is considered “mild” if values are between 130 and 135 mmol/l, “moderate” if between 120 and 129 mmol/l, and “severe” if below 120 mmol/l. As for the symptoms, it can be classified as mild, moderate, or severe according to their intensity. Hyponatremia is considered “acute” if developed in less than 48 h or “chronic” if developed over a longer period of time [10]. Also, it can be classified as iso-osmolar, hyperosmolar, and hypotonic or hypo-osmolar [10]. Hypotonic hyponatremia is most frequently encountered in clinical practice (60 % of all cases), especially in cancer patients, and the commonest cause of hypotonic hyponatremia with euvolemia is SIADH [10].

The differential diagnosis of hyponatremia can be performed with an exhaustive anamnesis, physical examination assessing the extracellular fluid volume status, and simple blood and urine laboratory tests [2, 11].

SIADH-related hyponatremia

SIADH is commonly caused by cancers, certain medications, central nervous system (CNS) disorders, pulmonary diseases, or other causes (AIDS, idiopathic, etc.) [12].

In cancer patients, SIADH is a paraneoplastic syndrome associated with a wide range of tumors but about 75 % of all cases are encountered in SCLC [13]. SIADH may be a result of ectopic arginine vasopressin (AVP) production by tumor cells or a result of stimulation of AVP secretion or potentiation of AVP effects by some anti-cancer drugs as well as by other factors like diarrhea or vomiting (Table 1) [2, 11].

Table 1.

The causes of SIADH in cancer patients

Cancer Drugs known to cause hyponatremia by affecting AVP production/action Lung diseases
SCLC Mechanism: increased hypothalamic AVP production Infections: pneumonia (bacterial or viral), tuberculosis
Gastrointestinal cancer
Pancreas adenocarcinoma Anti-cancer agents: Vinca alkaloids, platinum compounds, alkylating agents, and others
Hematological cancers
Sarcomas Palliative medications: opioid analgesics, antidepressants, antipsychotics, and antiepileptics Respiratory acute failure
CNS (primary and metastatic cancer) Mechanism: potentiation AVP actions
Prostate adenocarcinoma Anti-cancer agents: alkylating agents
Urothelial cancer Palliative medications: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antiepileptic and antidiabetic agents
Head and neck squamous cancer
Endometrial adenocarcinoma
Thymoma
Neuroendocrine tumors

AVP arginine vasopressin, CNS central nervous system, SCLC small cell lung cancer

Table adapted from Alcázar et al., FMC Oncología, March 2013, and Castillo et al., The Oncologist, 2012; 17:756–65

Before turning the diagnosis of SIADH, other clinical entities need to be excluded like hypothyroidism, hypopituitarism, severe emotional or physical stress, and medications that stimulate AVP release [14]. Several consensus documents have established the diagnosis criteria of SIADH in cancer patients (Table 2) [10].

Table 2.

SIADH diagnostic criteria

Serum Na <135 mmol/l
Plasma osmolarity <275 mOsm/kg
Urine osmolarity >100 mOsm/kg
Hypotonic hyponatremia with clinical euvolemia
Absence of signs of hypovolemia (normal eye pressure values, normal venous pressure, no orthostatism)
Absence of signs of hypervolemia (ascites, edemas)
Urinary Na >40 mmol/l (in the presence of dietary sodium)
No hypothyroidism, no adrenal insufficiency (hypocortisolism) or renal failure
No recent diuretic intake
Absence of physiological stimuli for AVP secretion (recent surgery, severe pain AVP secretion stimulating drugs…)

Table adapted from De las Peñas R et al. Clin Trans Oncol. 2014

AVP arginine vasopressin

Clinical consequences of hyponatremia due to SIADH

Hypotonic hyponatremia causes cerebral oedema, intracranial hypertension, and risk of brain injury [15, 16]. Patients with mild hyponatremia are traditionally asymptomatic. At serum concentrations between 125 and 130 mmol/l, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain may develop. As serum sodium concentration falls, agitation, confusion, hallucinations, incontinence, and other neurological symptoms predominate. Hyponatremia below 115 mmol/l may induce serious neurological squeals and constitutes a medical emergency [17].

Treatment of SIADH-related hyponatremia in cancer patients

Untreated acute hyponatremia can cause substantial morbidity and mortality as a result of osmotically induced cerebral edema, and excessively rapid correction can cause severe neurologic impairment and death as a result of osmotic demyelination [16]. Some recently published guidelines have reviewed the management of SIADH in cancer patients (Fig. 1) [10, 18].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Treatment algorithm for hyponatremia in cancer patients. De las Peñas et al. Clin Transl Oncol. 2014; 16:1051–9

Treating SIADH in hospital DCU

Hyponatremia is more common in hospitalized patients than in ambulatory individuals [19] and is independently associated with a higher risk in death, with increased length of stay and cost of care for hospitalized patients [58]. Mild hyponatremia occurs in 15 to 22 % of those patients and in approximately 7 % of ambulatory patients; moderate hyponatremia occurs in 1 to 7 % of hospitalized patients [12]. Oncology DCU allow patients to receive specialized care without needing to be hospitalized. Tolvaptan is an oral medication that in spite of being safe, like stated in the summary of product characteristics, it needs to be initiated at hospital so patients can have their serum sodium monitored [9]. If tolvaptan could be initiated in hospital DCU, hospitalization could be avoided, quality of life improved, and costs reduced.

Rationale for the use of tolvaptan in hospital DCU

Clinical and economic impact of hyponatremia in hospitalized cancer patients

Several studies and a meta-analysis, with hospitalized oncology patients, show the negative prognostic impact of the presence of hyponatremia in survival, clinical outcomes, and quality of life, and on the other hand, economic data can be extrapolated from studies on non-cancer patients regarding prolongation of hospital stay and increased hospital costs for this reason.

Clinical impact on survival, chemotherapy outcomes/patients prognosis, and ECOG score

Hyponatremia is associated with an increase in hospital mortality

Several studies in oncology patients showed direct alterations on survival in relation with hyponatremia [11, 2022]. A low serum sodium level could affect negatively the performance status and the quality of life of cancer patients, and may delay time-critical treatments such as chemotherapy [22]. Even mild hyponatremias have been associated with an increase in mortality in hospitalized patients [23]. In 3357 cancer patients hospitalized at the MD Anderson Cancer Center in 2006 for 3 months, hyponatremia was associated with worst survival during 90 days [24]. An analysis of all adult patients discharged from an academic medical center, during a 7-year period showed that mortality was significantly associated with a serum Na+ <138 mmol/l and Na+ >142 mmol/l [25].

Patients with hyponatremia who do not fully normalize the serum sodium value have a worse prognosis than those who normalize it

Hyponatremia was associated with poorer prognosis in a study with 402 patients treated with carboplatin-etoposide. Interestingly, patients with ectopic production of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) are reported to respond poorly to water restriction, and lack of response to water restriction within few days is suggested as screening test for ectopic production of ANP in hyponatremia SCLC patients. The treatment of hyponatremia at the study institution has predominantly been the prescription of water restriction, and in the series only 25 % of the patients with hyponatremia (<130 mmol/l) had fully normalized serum sodium to values above 135 mmol/l at the time of the second cycle of chemotherapy 3–4 weeks after the first cycle [20].

Hyponatremia is associated with worsening of serum sodium levels during hospitalization

In the Anderson Cancer Center study, hyponatremia was noted in 47 % of the patients (23 % at admission and 24 % was acquired during hospitalization) [24]. Data from an academic medical center in Canada reveal that hyponatremia worsening after admission was observed in 6 % of hospitalizations associated with community-acquired hyponatremia, while 38 % developed during hospitalization [25].

Satisfaction with care in cancer patients treated at hospital DCU is high

A study that evaluated the satisfaction with care in cancer patients treated at hospital DCU showed that satisfaction with care in this setting is high and correlation between satisfaction with care and quality of life indicated that these two concerns are complementary [26].

The ECOG performance status score at admission shows a negative correlation with the sodium status

A study that checked the effects of hyponatremia among patients with lung carcinoma on their Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance showed that the ECOG score at admission shows a negative correlation with the serum sodium status measured on admission among all the patients. The ECOG score correlated with the duration of the patient survival and the response to treatment, as well as their quality of life and co-morbidity. This study concludes that hyponatremia may influence the ECOG performance status score, which serves as an important factor in the prognosis of lung cancer [27].

Economic impact in hospital costs and hospital length of stay and complications

Hyponatremia increases hospital costs

A retrospective analysis that evaluated the impact of varying levels of hyponatremia at admission on cost of care in adult hospitalized patients showed median costs of $16,606 for moderate-to-severe hyponatremia cases, $14,266 for mild-to-moderate, and $13,066 for normal admissions (P < 0.001). Based on an annual admission rate at that institution of approximately 55, 000, it was estimated that patients admitted with hyponatremia were associated with an additional $2.15 million in hospital costs and over 3400 additional bed days [28].

Data from the Integrated HealthCare Information Services National Managed Care Benchmark Database showed that hyponatremia was associated with 99 % higher 6-months costs, and also associated with 108 % higher 1-year medical costs. It was estimated that hyponatremia increased direct medical costs at 6 and 12 months (41. 2 and 45.7 %, respectively) [29].

An analysis performed to estimate the annual cost of hyponatremia in the USA showed that 55–63 % of hyponatremia patients are initially treated as inpatients, 25 % are initially treated in the emergency room, and 13–20 % are treated solely in the office setting. The direct costs of treating hyponatremia in the USA on an annual basis were estimated to range from $1.6 to $3.6 billion. Hospitalization costs (including readmissions) accounted for approximately 70 % of the total cost of illness [30].

Hyponatremia in cancer patients at admission is associated with longer length of stay and hospital complications

The Anderson Cancer Center study showed that the length of stay of patients with hyponatremia was significantly higher than for those with normal sodium levels (10.2 + 10.2 vs. 5.6 + 5.0 days; P < 0.01), and for those mild/moderate hyponatremia cases, the length of stay was also higher (9.9 and 13.0 + 14.1 vs. 5.6 + 5.0 days) [24].

On the other hand, patients with more severe hyponatremia were also more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit during the hospital stay (moderate-to-severe hyponatremia, 32 %; mild-to-moderate hyponatremia, 26 %; normal, 22 %; P < 0.001) [28].

The extrapolation of these data to studies with cancer patients confronts us with the fact that almost 50 % of hospitalized patients have hyponatremia, as we have seen, and its presence prolongs the duration of hospitalization in 2–5 days [28]. A recent study with 105 consecutive cancer patients showed a statistically significant correlation between the length of stay and the detection of hyponatremia both at admission (P = 0.0009) and during hospitalization (P = 0.0001). In this study, and according to this length of stay, a patient with moderate hyponatremia cost 128 % more than a normonatremic patient [21].

Advantages for the use of tolvaptan in DCU

DCU are specialized places where patients can have all the controls needed after the first administration of tolvaptan so, taking into account the mentioned clinical and economic impact of hyponatremia in hospitalized cancer patients, we can presume that the ambulatory early correction with tolvaptan in DCU can:

  • Facilitate the administration of chemotherapy cycles in a timely manner, which could probably improve the tumor disease and increase patient’s survival.

  • Ease the prompt correction of serum sodium levels, for a quick start of chemotherapy, which would presumably have a positive impact in the patients’ prognosis.

  • Minimize the risk of hyponatremia getting worst during hospitalization, when possible.

  • Make the patient’s treatment compatible with their daily activities and allow these patients to be closer to their families.

  • Have a positive impact in the quality of life of oncology patients with hyponatremia.

  • Reduce costs originated from hospitalization as well as decrease the emergencies which are the usual route of entry for these patients to hospital.

  • Prevent hospital admission, in selected patients, with the associated hospitalization risks like prolonged length of stay and admission to intensive care units helping reduce hospital costs as well as health complications for the patient.

Management and recommendations for the use of tolvaptan to treat SIADH in hospital DCU

Clinical experience based on clinical cases with the use of tolvaptan in hospital DCU

Active treatment of SIADH-related hyponatremia must be started as soon as possible to avoid delays in the patients’ oncologic treatment [31], and also because in a significant number of cases, the hyponatremia origin is paraneoplastic and the tumor treatment itself becomes a key factor for the correction of the natremia [11].

While in severe, very symptomatic situations, hypertonic saline solution is considered the standard of care [10, 11, 31] in those cases of moderate hyponatremia, where a controlled increase of the natremia is desired, the first line treatment would be hydric restriction or tolpalvan administration [11]. In particular, hydric restriction may not be possible in the oncologic population because these patients require high hydration for their intravenous treatment administration. Moreover, the natremia correction rate is often inadequate and has a low treatment adherence [11]. Tolvaptan meets the requirements of rapidity, efficacy, safety, and adherence, so it can be considered a good treatment choice, especially in those patients in whom the treatment of the malignancy that is causing the SIADH requires an immediate start of chemotherapy that cannot be administered without adequate hydration volumes [11, 13] or in malnourished patients, for whom liquid restriction would worsen their nutritional state [31].

Tolvaptan is usually initiated in hospital due to the need for a dose titration phase with close monitoring of serum sodium and volume status 4–6 h after its administration [9]. However, since this type of control can be done at DCU, these units could help avoid hospitalization in some selected cancer patients with hyponatremia, with all the advantages described previously.

To evaluate this retrospectively, a series of 35 clinical cases were collected from cancer patients receiving treatment with tolvaptan in 3 hospital DCU in Spain [Hospital Provincial de Castellón, Castellón (from September 2011 to May 2014); Hospital Doce de Octubre, Madrid (from March 2013 to September 2014); and Hospital Virgen de la Macarena, Sevilla (from August 2011 to December 2014)] (Table 3).

Table 3.

Patients and disease characteristics at admission

Patients, n (%) 35
- Male 16 (46)
- Female 19 (54)
Median age, years (range) 66 (42–85)
Type of cancer, n° of patients
- SCLC 15
- NSCLC 7
- Rectal adenocarcinoma 1
- Ovary 1
- Breast 1
- Prostate 1
- Ampulloma 1
- Multiple myeloma 1
- Colon 1
- Oesophagus 1
- Refractory diffuse large B-cell Lymphoma 1
- Thymoma 1
- Urothelial 1
- Neuroendocrine 1
- Unknown primary site 1
Vital signs prior tolvaptan treatment, median (range)
- Weight (kg) 67 (52–80) (from n= 34)
- Heart rate (bpm) 85 (66–100) (from n= 18)
- Blood pressure (mmHg) 128 (155–110) – 72 (85–60) (from n= 17)
Median natremia prior tolvaptan treatment initiation, mmol/L, (range) 125 (117–130)
Type of hyponatremia, n° of patients (%)
- Mild (130–135 mmol/L) 2 (6)
- Moderate (120–129 mmol/L) 31 (88)
- Severe (Below 120 mmol/L) 2 (6)
Patient symptomatic, n° of patients (%) 26 (74)
- Headache 13 (50)
- Asthenia 6 (23)
- Weakness 4 (15)
- Dizziness 4 (15)
- Confusion 3 (12)
- Unsteady gait 3 (12)
- Disorientation 2 (8)
- Fall 1 (4)
- Sleepiness 1 (4)
Treatments before Tolvaptan, n° of patients (%) 11 (31)
- Fluids restriction 11 (31)
- Hypertonic infusion 3 (9)
- No prior treatment 24 (69)
Results (Tolvaptan)
Patients monitored after treatment initiation, n° of patients (%)
- After 4-6h 13 (37)
- After 24 hours 35 (100)
Days to restore the natremia, n° of patients (%)
- 1–4 days 18 (51)
- More than 4 days 13 (37)
- Partial response 3 (9)
- No response 1 (3)
Adverse events reported, n° of patients Mild Moderate Severe
- Thirst 9 3 0
- Polyuria 6 4 0
- Dry mouth 4 0 0
- Hepatic enzymes elevation 2 0 0
- Others 0 0 0

NSCLC no small cell lung cancer, SCLC small cell lung cancer

In all cases, it was suspected a paraneoplastic-related SIADH, and 63 % of the patients underwent treatments that could exacerbate the hyponatremia (18 with opioids, 5 with diuretics, and 3 with antidepressants). Furthermore, 74 % of these patients showed symptomatic hyponatremia and 11 of them showed at least two characteristic symptoms of this electrolyte disorder. The most predominant symptomatology was neurologic. Three patients with severe symptoms were initially treated with hypertonic saline solution. After having controlled the acute initial situation in these patients, they underwent hydric restriction together with other eight patients that did not require this initial treatment. Afterwards, when the criteria for natremia correction were not achieved, tolvaptan was used. In the remaining patients that were not candidates for hydric restriction, tolvaptan treatment was initiated directly, following the general guidelines of the treatment algorithm described in Fig. 1. When tolvaptan was used, no significant changes in vital signs described in Fig. 1 were observed.

The results showed that 12 of the 13 patients monitored after 4–6 h of treatment initiation improved their serum sodium levels without an overcorrection, with two patients needing a dose escalation to 30 mg. After 24 h, 2 of the 35 patients had no serum sodium correction, 1 patient a slight over correction (13 mmol/l), and all the rest of patients had correct corrections of their serum sodium. The time to restore their natremia was 1–4 days for 18 patients, more than 4 days (maximum was 29) for 13 patients, a partial response (defined as an improvement of sodium levels without reaching normal values) for 3 patients, and no response (described as no sodium improvement) for 1 patient. Twenty-four patients stopped tolvaptan without any adjustment period when they needed it, 2 had a gradual dose reduction, and 9 reduced the dose by having it on alternate days until withdrawn. Adverse effects were reported in 17 patients, mainly thirst (9 mild and 3 moderate) and polyuria (6 mild and 4 moderate). Only four mild cases of dry mouth and two mild cases of hepatic enzymes elevation (both of them with liver metastases) were reported. No cases of osmotic demyelization or other adverse events were reported. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V4.0 (CTCAE scale) was used to grade the severity of each adverse events. Twenty patients could receive chemotherapy after their serum sodium correction (9 immediately after, 1 after 3 h, 1 after 5 h, 5 after 24 h, and 4 after 48 h), and 1 of them also underwent radiotherapy after the correction. There was no morbidity nor mortality associated to the use of tolvaptan throughout the treatment. This data reinforces the drug safety described in previous publications [1, 9, 31]. General mortality fluctuated between 4 and 68 weeks since the beginning of hyponatremia treatment (n = 16). However, this data is of limited value due to the sample being small and heterogeneous (tumors at different stages of the disease; the tumor is often diagnosed long before the hyponatremia, mortality is thus related to the evolution of the disease itself).

Based on the findings from these clinical cases, all hyponatremia patients were correctly treated in the DCU, with no serious adverse effects from the medication. They all started chemotherapy in no more than 48 h. Subsequently, the treatment with tolvaptan might have led to an improvement of the ECOG-performance status. In addition, all patients benefited from the effective management of SIADH by receiving the hyponatremia treatment in the same place they received their chemotherapy and also by being able to go home instead of going through the inconveniences and risks that can arise with hospitalization. Our conclusion is that hyponatremia can be treated in hospital DCU as long as proper monitoring of the serum levels can be performed.

Despite the limitations of retrospective observational studies, the positive results of these cases support the hypothesis that tolvaptan can be used effectively and safely in hospital DCU. There is no other similar published data so our experience and recommendations can be a good reference for other professionals in the field who may want to benefit from treating their patients with tolvaptan as outpatients instead of in hospital.

Recommendations for the use of tolvaptan in hospital DCU

Based on the previous information, some minimum recommendations are proposed.

Patient selection

  • The most suited patients for this protocol are those with moderate hyponatremia (120–129 mmol/l) with mild/moderate symptoms, currently on anti-cancer active or palliative treatment (provided that the correction of hyponatremia is part of their established treatment strategy).

  • Patients at higher risk of demyelination syndromes (those with hypoxia, alcoholism, or malnutrition) should be avoided since they would need closer management [9]. Patients must not present any contraindications for the use of tolvaptan like hypersensitivity to the active substance/excipients, anuria, volume depletion, hypovolemic hyponatremia, and hypernatremia, patients who cannot perceive thirst and pregnancy or breast feeding [9].

  • Patients must be able to stay at the hospital within 6 h for an analytical control and then return again 24 h after treatment initiation for further controls. In addition, they should live at less than 1-h distance from hospital in case of emergency as well as have good family support. This protocol can only be carried out in DCU with a minimum of 12 h continued attention so patients can have a control 6 h after treatment initiation.

  • Patients/their relatives will be informed about the possible side effects of the treatment with tolvaptan and asked to return to hospital immediately if the patient experiences any of them.

Treatment dose

  • After establishing the diagnosis and verifying the selection criteria are met, treatment with tolvaptan can be initiated in DCU at a dose of 15 mg once daily. The dose may be increased to a maximum of 60 mg once daily as tolerated to achieve the desired level of serum sodium [9]. Patients may drink fluids freely after treatment initiation [9].

Analytical controls after the first tolvaptan dose

  • An analytical control (for serum sodium and volume status) is recommended no later than 6 h after. If there is no over rapid serum sodium correction, the patient can be sent home and have another control 24 h after treatment initiation. If it shows worsening of the patient’s condition or serum sodium correction exceeds 6 mmol/l within 6 h, the patient should be hospitalized for closer monitoring and administration of hypertonic fluids.

  • If serum sodium increases ≥12 mmol/l within 24 h or ≥18 mmol/l within 48 h or there is a hypernatremia >145 mmol/l, tolvaptan treatment needs to be interrupted or discontinued followed by administration of hypotonic fluid [9]. If it increases <136 + ≤5 mmol/l within 24 h, the tolvaptan dose should be increased.

  • Further controls will be done after 3–10 days depending on patients’ overall condition and serum sodium correction as well as circumstances like the date of their next appointment.

Treatment duration and withdrawal recommendation

  • Tolvaptan should continue until the underlying disease is adequately treated or until hyponatremia is no longer a clinical problem [10]. According to the results of our series, natremia was normalized in 51 % of patients in the first 4 days, increasing to 88 % of them within 29 days of treatment with tolvaptan.

  • For patients on a 15-mg dose, tolvaptan can be withdrawn abruptly or reduced gradually/taken on alternate days, as clinically indicated. If patients are on higher doses, i.e., 30 mg, gradual dose reduction is preferred until the dose reaches 15 mg and then it can be withdrawn abruptly or gradually as mentioned before.

With regard to cancer:

  • For SCLC (highly chemo sensible): If there is an improvement of the hyponatremia after 7 days, to reduce the dose to one tablet every 48 h or 7.5 mg every 24 h; if there is no improvement, to keep the same dose. If there is improvement after 14 days, stop the treatment. Have an additional control after 21 days.

  • For head and neck cancer: Since the patient is on radiotherapy, to have him/her controlled every week to consider stopping tolvaptan. If the cancer is disseminated, the management would be similar to that of SCLC.

  • For lymphomas: To use a similar management than for SCLC since it is highly chemo sensible.

  • Other tumors: It will depend on the treatment outcomes and the treatment schedules.

  • In palliative care: Always keep tolvaptan if there is an improvement in the symptoms.

When to start chemotherapy

Start chemotherapy as soon as possible, depending as well on other factors like the tumor type or the date of the week.

Suggested algorithm for the use of tolvaptan in DCU

The main mentioned recommendations for the use of tolvaptan in patients with moderate hyponatremias (120–129 mmol/l) candidate or not candidate for chemotherapy in hospital DCU have been established based on the described clinical experience and publications. The aim of these recommendations is to guide other professionals in the field to consider treating their moderate SIADH-related hyponatremia oncology patients in hospital DCU (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Recommendations for treating hyponatremia in cancer patients in hospital day care units

To summarize, it is suggested to administer 15 mg of tolvaptan at hospital DCU with a control of the natremia 6 h after. If the control shows worsening or over correction of serum sodium levels, the patient should be hospitalized for closer monitoring. If the patient shows improvement, another control should be performed 18 h after. If the control shows improvement, chemotherapy can be started after 24 h in those patients that are candidate for it and withdrawal of tolvaptan will be considered as previously described. In those not candidate to chemotherapy, tolvaptan therapy should be continued until symptoms improve. In all cases, another control of serum sodium levels should be performed 3–10 days after.

Conclusions

Our retrospective study confirms that tolvaptan can be administered ambulatory in hospital DCU in those patients with a moderate hyponatremia (120–139 mmol/l) with mild-to-moderate symptoms, currently on anti-cancer active or palliative treatment.

The correction of hyponatremia in cancer patients can help reduce hospital stays, potentially resulting in savings, improve hyponatremia-related symptoms, as well as increase patients overall quality of life and survival.

The use of tolvaptan has proven to be safe and effective in the therapeutic management of SIADH-related hyponatremia in hospital DCU.

Acknowledgments

Conflict of interest

This publication was funded by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Spain, without involving any legal commitment on the results. None of the authors who participated in this paper work or have worked in Otsuka. All authors have collaborated in the conception, drafting, review, and approval of the manuscript submitted, and agreed to allow the journal to review their data if requested.

Footnotes

Camps, Carcereny, Escobar, Rodriquez and Virizuela contributed equally to this work.

References

  • 1.Verbalis JG, Adler S, Schrier RW, for the SALT Investigators et al. Efficacy and safety of oral tolvaptan therapy in patients with the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;164:725–732. doi: 10.1530/EJE-10-1078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Alcázar R, Puerta M (2013) SIADH: Pathophysiology, classification and diagnosis in the hospitalized patient. FMC: Oncología 8: supl 1
  • 3.Runkle I, Villabona C, Navarro A, et al. Tratamiento de la hiponatremia secundaria al syndrome de secreción inadecuada de la hormona antidiurética: algoritmo multidisciplinar. Nefrol. 2014;4:439–450. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sørensen JB, Andersen MK, Hansen HH. Syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) in malignant disease. J Intern Med. 1995;238:97–110. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1995.tb00907.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gill G, Huda B, Boyd A, et al. Characteristics and mortality of severe hyponatraemia: a hospital based study. Clin Endocrinol. 2006;65:246–249. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2006.02583.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sherlock M, O’Sullivan E, Agha A, et al. The incidence and pathophysiology of hyponatraemia after subarachnoid haemorrhage. Clin Endocrinol. 2006;64:250–254. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2006.02432.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sherlock M, O’Sullivan E, Agha A, et al. Incidence and pathophysiology of severe hyponatraemia in neurosurgical patients. Postgrad Med J. 2009;85:171–175. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2008.072819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shea AM, Hammill BG, Curtis LH, et al. Medical costs of abnormal serum sodium levels. J A Soc Nephrol. 2008;19:764–770. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2007070752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Samsca (2014) Summary of product characteristics
  • 10.De las Peñas R, Escobar Y, Henao F, et al. SEOM guidelines on hydroelectrolitic disorders. Clin Transl Oncol. 2014 doi: 10.1007/s12094-014-1234-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Castillo JJ, Vicent M, Justice E. Diagnosis and management of hyponatremia in cancer patients. Oncologist. 2012;17:756–765. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ellison DH, Berl T. The syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2064–2072. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp066837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.De las Peñas R (2013) Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion in the hospitalized oncologic patient. FMC: Oncología 8: supl 1
  • 14.Schrier RW, Bansal S. Diagnosis and management of hyponatremia in acute illness. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008;14:627–634. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32830e45e3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Adrogue HJ, Madias NE. Hyponatremia. N Eng J Med. 2000;342:1581–1589. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005253422107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Verbalis JG, Goldsmith SR, Greenberg A, et al. Diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of hyponatremia: expert panel recommendations. Am J Med. 2013;126:S1–S42. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hannon MJ, Thompson CJ. The syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone: prevalence, causes and consequences. Eur J Endocrinol. 2010;162:S5–S12. doi: 10.1530/EJE-09-1063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Grohé C, et al. Hyponatraemia-SIADH in lung cancer diagnostic and treatment algorithms. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2015 Apr 23. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.04.005 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 19.Gankam-Kengne F, Ayers C, Khera A, et al. Mild hyponatremia is associated with an increased risk of death in an ambulatory setting. Kid Int. 2013;83:700–706. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hansen O, Sorensen P, Hansen KH. The occurrence of hyponatremia in SCLC and the influence on prognosis. A retrospective study of 453 patients treated in a single institution in a 10-year period. Lung Cancer. 2010;68:111–114. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2009.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Berardi R, Caramanti M, Castagnani M et al. (2015) Hyponatremia is a predictor of hospital length and cost of stay and outcome in cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. Mar 5 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 22.Berardi R, Caramanti M, Fiordoliva I, et al. Hyponatraemia is a predictor of clinical outcome for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23:621–626. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2398-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Waikar SS, Mount DB, Curhan GC, et al. Mortality after hospitalization with mild, moderate, and severe hyponatremia. Am J Med. 2009;122:857–865. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.01.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Doshi SM, Shah P, Lei X, et al. Hyponatremia in hospitalized cancer patients and its impact on clinical outcomes. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;59:222–228. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.08.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wald R, Jaber BL, Price LL, et al. Impact of hospital-associated hyponatremia on selected outcomes. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:294–302. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Arraras JI, Illarramendi JJ, Viudez A, et al. Determinants of patient satisfaction with care in a Spanish oncology day hospital and its relationship with quality of life. Psycho-Oncology. 2013;22:2454–2461. doi: 10.1002/pon.3307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sengupta A, Banerjee SN, Biswas NM, et al. The incidence of hyponatraemia and its effect on the ECOG performance status among lung cancer patients. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7:1678–1682. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/5900.3225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Callahan MA. Economic impact of hyponatremia in hospitalized patients: a retrospective cohort study. Postgrad Med. 2009;121:186–191. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2009.03.1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sheea AM, Hammill BG, Curtis LH, et al. Medical costs of abnormal serum sodium levels. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;19:764–770. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2007070752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Boscoe A, Paramore C, Verbalis JG, et al. Cost of illness of hyponatremia in the United States. Effect Resour All. 2006;4:10. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-4-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Runkle I, Gómez-Hoyos E, Cuesta-Hernández M, et al. Hyponatraemia in older patients: a clinical and practical approach. Rev Clin Gerontol. 2015;25:31–52. doi: 10.1017/S0959259814000197. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Supportive Care in Cancer are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES