Skip to main content
Science Advances logoLink to Science Advances
. 2024 Jul 17;10(29):eado2682. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ado2682

Crown-of-thorns starfish complete their larval phase eating only nitrogen-fixing Trichodesmium cyanobacteria

Benjamin Mos 1,2,3,*,, Dirk Erler 4,, Corinne Lawson 3,, Symon A Dworjanyn 3
PMCID: PMC466945  PMID: 39018391

Abstract

Cyanobacteria of the genus Trichodesmium form extensive blooms that supply new N to nutrient-poor marine ecosystems. Yet little is known about what eats Trichodesmium. In this laboratory study, we show that one of the greatest threats to coral reefs, predatory crown-of-thorns starfish (CoTS), Acanthaster sp., completes their larval phase feeding solely on Trichodesmium. We observed Trichodesmium erythraeum CMP1985 in the stomachs of larvae using florescence microscopy and traced the assimilation of nitrogen from labeled trichomes into larval tissues using stable isotopes. Some larvae fed T. erythraeum were morphologically ready to become benthic juveniles after 19 days. Given that Trichodesmium can be food for CoTS, reported increases in Trichodesmium could be a driving factor in the heightened frequency of CoTS population irruptions that have devastated coral reefs in past decades. Future studies could test this through investigating the diets of wild larvae and incorporating Trichodesmium abundance into models of CoTS population dynamics.


Trichodesmium cyanobacteria are an overlooked source of food for larvae of the most important predator of corals.

INTRODUCTION

Global primary productivity relies on N2 fixation by only a few types of cyanobacteria, one of which is the genus Trichodesmium (1, 2). Solitary multicellular trichomes and aggregations of trichomes are common throughout the year in tropical and subtropical oceans, where they migrate vertically throughout the photic zone (3, 4) but can also form seasonal surface blooms covering up to tens of thousands of square kilometers (57), with the timing of these blooms varying among regions (7, 8). The amount of nitrogen fixed by Trichodesmium spp. (hereafter Trichodesmium) is estimated to be 60 to 80 Tg of N per year, equivalent to 30 to 80% of global marine N2 fixation (2, 9). Yet despite their prevalence and crucial role in N cycling, little is known about the trophic ecology of Trichodesmium. The few organisms known to prey on Trichodesmium are specialist copepods that live among aggregations (8, 1012), although trichomes are ingested by four fishes, several salps, a pelagic crab, a penaeid prawn/shrimp, a pearl oyster, and one bird species (1315).

At least 80% of all tropical marine benthic invertebrates spend time in the water column as larvae, consuming phytoplankton before settling to the benthos (16, 17). Trichodesmium are often the most abundant phytoplankton in tropical oceans (5, 1820) but are overlooked as potential food for larvae; reputedly toxic, oversized, and nutritionally poor (2, 14, 15, 21, 22). The only study to feed Trichodesmium to the larvae of a non-pelagic marine invertebrate found larval banana prawns, Penaeus merguiensis, ingested Trichodesmium sp. MACC0993 but did not develop beyond the first larval stage and displayed degeneration of gut cells consistent with starvation (14). Alternatively, it is possible that larvae use Trichodesmium as a source of nutrition by absorbing dissolved organic material (DOM) that leaks from trichomes (23, 24).

We report that larvae of the crown-of-thorns starfish (hereafter CoTS), Acanthaster sp., can complete their larval phase feeding solely on Trichodesmium. Adult CoTS are coral predators, capable of decimating Indo-Pacific coral reefs during population irruptions that contribute to coral reef ecosystem decline on Australia’s world-heritage listed Great Barrier Reef (GBR) and elsewhere (25). Patterns in the ages of scars on long-lived massive corals, along with models of CoTS and coral population dynamics, suggest that population irruptions on the GBR during the past 50 years were more widespread and occurred more frequently than they did before the 1960s (26, 27). The causes of these “outbreaks” in CoTS numbers are hotly debated, but a leading hypothesis is that the normally low abundance of the larvae’s phytoplankton food in oligotrophic tropical waters acts as a population bottleneck (25, 28). A heightened frequency of CoTS outbreaks has been attributed to anthropogenic terrestrial nutrient influxes that cause phytoplankton blooms and subsequent pulses of CoTS recruitment (28). Our results demonstrate that Trichodesmium can be a food source for CoTS that allows them to reach the juvenile stage. On the basis of this finding, we propose that reported increases in Trichodesmium availability in the GBR lagoon (18, 29, 30) could be a driving factor in the heightened frequency of CoTS outbreaks.

To show that CoTS are capable of ingesting Trichodesmium, in a laboratory feed trial, we fed 8-day-old CoTS larvae Trichodesmium erythraeum CMP1985 at three concentrations mimicking bloom and non-bloom conditions and observed trichomes in the stomachs of larvae after 3 and 24 hours. To demonstrate that larval CoTS digest Trichodesmium, we cultured T. erythraeum in medium enriched with isotopically labeled nitrogen (N) gas (15N-N) and measured increased 15N:14N ratios in both T. erythraeum and CoTS larvae fed 15N-labeled trichomes in a laboratory-scale feed trial. Last, to show that Trichodesmium supports normal larval development, we fed CoTS larvae T. erythraeum and DOM derived from T. erythraeum and followed development, growth, and survival in 1-liter cultures compared to unfed larvae and larvae fed Proteomonas sulcata, a cryptomonad microalga known to support rapid growth and development of larval CoTS (31). Some larvae fed T. erythraeum were morphologically ready to settle after 19 days, 6 days later than larvae fed P. sulcata. All larvae fed DOM and unfed larvae died by day 25.

RESULTS

Larvae ingest Trichodesmium

Eight-day-old larval CoTS exposed to T. erythraeum trichomes had material visible in the esophagus and stomach within a few hours (Fig. 1). The material in the digestive tract of larvae fed T. erythraeum fluoresced red when viewed under ultraviolet (UV) light at the wavelengths associated with fluorescence of chlorophyll (Fig. 1A). We also directly observed on multiple occasions CoTS larvae transfer a T. erythraeum trichome into their esophagus before rejecting the trichome or passing the trichome into their stomach (fig. S3). Unfed larvae did not have any fluorescent material in their digestive tract at any time.

Fig. 1. Ingestion of filamentous cyanobacteria T. erythraeum CCMP1985 by 8-day-old CoTS (Acanthaster sp.) larvae.

Fig. 1.

(A) Representative photographs of the digestive tract of CoTS larvae that were maintained in seawater without phytoplankton (Unfed) or seawater containing 100 trichomes ml−1 T. erythraeum for 3 hours, viewed using a compound microscope (40× or 100× zoom) under bright-field, unfiltered ultraviolet light (UV), and UV light with Olympus 19010 Chlorophyll Longpass filter (chlorophyll). Scale bars, 100 μm (black) and 50 μm (white). Original photos are in the Supplementary Materials (figs. S1 and S2). (B and C) Proportion of CoTS larvae that had fluorescing material in their digestive tract after (B) 3 hours and (C) 24 hours. Larvae were maintained in seawater containing a cryptomonad alga known to be readily consumed by CoTS, P. sulcata CS-412 (Proteomonas) or T. erythraeum CCMP1985 (Trichodesmium) at three densities: high, 1 × 104 cells ml−1 (P. sulcata) or 100 trichomes ml−1 (T. erythraeum); medium, 1 × 103 cells ml−1 or 10 trichomes ml−1; or low, 1 × 102 cells ml−1 or 1 trichome ml−1. Larvae in an unfed control treatment did not have phytoplankton in their digestive tract at any time (not shown). Data are means ± SE, n = 3.

After 3 hours, 28 to 78% of the CoTS larvae that were exposed to each of the two phytoplankton had material in their digestive tract (Fig. 1B). There were significantly more larvae with material in their digestive tract when fed P. sulcata than for larvae fed T. erythraeum, and this was independent of the density of phytoplankton [Fig. 1B; two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by pairwise test, table S1]. The proportion of larvae with material in their digestive tract when fed phytoplankton at a high density (1 × 104 cells ml−1 P. sulcata or 100 trichomes ml−1 T. erythraeum) was the same as for larvae fed phytoplankton at a medium density (1 × 103 cells ml−1 or 10 trichomes ml−1) and significantly greater than when larvae were fed phytoplankton at a low density (1 × 102 cells ml−1 or 1 trichome ml−1) (Fig. 1B and table S1). Unfed larvae did not have any material in their digestive tract.

After 24 hours, 31 to 96% of the larvae that were exposed to each of the two phytoplankton had material in their digestive tract (Fig. 1C). There were significantly more larvae with material in their digestive tract when fed P. sulcata than for larvae fed T. erythraeum, and this was independent of the density of the phytoplankton (Fig. 1C; two-way ANOVA followed by pairwise test, table S1). The proportion of larvae with material in their digestive tract when fed phytoplankton at a high density was greater than for larvae fed phytoplankton at a low and medium density, and there were more larvae with food in their digestive tract when fed phytoplankton at a medium density than for those fed at a low phytoplankton density (Fig. 1C and table S1). Unfed larvae did not have any material in their digestive tract.

Larvae incorporate N fixed by Trichodesmium

Mean δ15N {where δ15N = [(15N/14N)sample/(15N/14N)air] − 1} of larval CoTS ranged from 7.5 to 164.8 per mil and depended on the feeding treatment that larvae were exposed to (Fig. 2; F4,18 = 486.97, P < 0.0001, followed by Tukey b test). Larvae fed 15N-labeled trichomes (i.e., T. erythraeum grown in culture medium with 15N-N2 gas headspace) had significantly higher δ15N than larvae fed T. erythraeum grown in standard culture medium (i.e., unlabeled trichomes) or unfed larvae (Fig. 2). When 15N-labeled T. erythraeum culture was separated into solid (trichomes) and dissolved fractions (DOM) and given to larvae, the δ15N of larvae fed labeled trichomes only was significantly greater than all other treatments, whereas the δ15N of larvae fed labeled DOM did not differ from larvae fed unlabeled trichomes or unfed larvae (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. δ15N of larval CoTS, Acanthaster sp., fed T. erythraeum CCMP1985 and DOM derived from T. erythraeum cultures for 48 hours in a laboratory experiment.

Fig. 2.

Before feeding, T. erythraeum was grown for 5 days in sealed bottles with an ambient air headspace (not enriched) or 15N-N gas headspace (15N-enriched culture medium). T. erythraeum and DOM were segregated via 0.45-μm filtration before feeding (see Materials and Methods). Bars that have a common letter are not significantly different according to ANOVA, F4,18 = 486.97, P < 0.00001, followed by Tukey b test. Data are means ± SD, n = 4 for not enriched treatments and n = 5 for 15N-enriched culture medium treatments. ‰, per mil.

Larvae fed Trichodesmium develop normally

Growth and development of larval CoTS to 25 days postfertilization (dpf) was influenced by their diet (Figs. 3 and 4). At 10 dpf, larval diet treatment had a significant effect on the length (F3,36 = 3.40, P < 0.028, followed by Tukey b test; Fig. 3A), width (F3,36 = 3.25, P < 0.033; Fig. 3A), and area (F3,36 = 4.64, P < 0.008; Fig. 3A) of larval CoTS but did not affect the length of ciliated bands (F3,36 = 1.60, P = 0.206; Fig. 3A). Larvae fed P. sulcata were longer than larvae that were not fed (Fig. 3A). There was no statistical difference in the length of larvae fed P. sulcata, T. erythraeum, and DOM (derived from T. erythraeum) (Fig. 3A) and no statistical difference in the length of larvae fed T. erythraeum, DOM, and unfed larvae (Fig. 3A). Larvae fed P. sulcata were wider than larvae that were not fed (Fig. 3A). There was no statistical difference in the width of larvae fed P. sulcata, T. erythraeum, and DOM (Fig. 3A) and no statistical difference in the width of larvae fed T. erythraeum, DOM, and unfed larvae (Fig. 3A). Larvae fed P. sulcata had greater area than larvae that were not fed and larvae fed T. erythraeum, which did not differ (Fig. 3A). The area of larvae fed DOM was not statistically different than all other treatments (Fig. 3A).

Fig. 3. Effect of diet on the morphology of larval CoTS (Acanthaster sp.).

Fig. 3.

(A) Ten dpf (days postfertilization). (B) Sixteen dpf. Larvae were grown in 1-liter rearing containers and fed from 5 dpf with T. erythraeum CCMP1985 at a concentration of 20 trichomes ml−1 (Tricho.), DOM derived from T. erythraeum cultures (DOM), a cryptomonad alga known to support normal development of CoTS larvae, P. sulcata CS-412 at a density of 5 × 104 cells ml−1 (Proteo.), or were not fed (Unfed). The P. sulcata treatment was not followed beyond 13 dpf as some larvae in this treatment had reached their developmental endpoint (late brachiolaria) indicative of competency to metamorphose and settle into the juvenile lifestage (Fig. 4). Within each graph, bars that have a common letter are not significantly different according to ANOVA, P < 0.05 (in text), followed by Tukey b post hoc test. Data are means ± SE, n = 10.

Fig. 4. Effect of diet on the development of larval CoTS (Acanthaster sp.).

Fig. 4.

(A) Thirteen dpf. (B) Nineteen dpf. Larvae were grown in 1-liter rearing containers and fed from 5 dpf with T. erythraeum CCMP1985 at a concentration of 20 trichomes ml−1 (Tricho.), DOM derived from T. erythraeum cultures (DOM), a cryptomonad alga known to support rapid development of CoTS larvae, P. sulcata CS-412 at a density of 5 × 104 cells ml−1 (Proteo.), or were not fed (Unfed). The P. sulcata treatment was not followed beyond 13 dpf. Data are means ± SE, n = 4 to 10.

Growth of larvae fed P. sulcata was not followed beyond 10 dpf as larvae in this treatment reached their developmental endpoint (late brachiolaria) at 13 dpf (Fig. 4). At 16 dpf, larval diet treatment had a significant effect on the length (F2,27 = 3.68, P < 0.038, followed by Tukey b test; Fig. 3B), width (F2,27 = 4.77, P < 0.017; Fig. 3B), and length of ciliated bands (F2,27 = 5.55, P < 0.010; Fig. 3B) of larval CoTS but did not affect area (F2,27 = 1.64, P = 0.214; Fig. 3B). Larvae fed T. erythraeum were longer than larvae that were not fed (Fig. 3B). There was no statistical difference in the length of larvae fed T. erythraeum and DOM (Fig. 3B) and no statistical difference in the length of larvae fed DOM and unfed larvae (Fig. 3B). Larvae fed T. erythraeum were wider than larvae that were not fed (Fig. 3B). There was no statistical difference in the width of larvae fed T. erythraeum and DOM (Fig. 3B) and no statistical difference in the width of larvae fed DOM and unfed larvae (Fig. 3B). Larvae fed T. erythraeum had longer ciliated bands than larvae that were not fed (Fig. 3B). There was no statistical difference in the length of the ciliated bands of larvae fed T. erythraeum and DOM (Fig. 3B) and no statistical difference in the width of larvae fed DOM and unfed larvae (Fig. 3B).

Development of CoTS larvae varied among larval feeding treatments (Fig. 4). At 13 dpf, there were no differences in the proportion of abnormal larvae among treatments (F3,30 = 0.24, P = 0.870; mean, 18.1 to 23.5%; Fig. 4A). However, larvae fed P. sulcata were substantially more developed compared to all other treatments, with 46.6% at the early brachiolaria stage, and some (~1 in 20) at the final larval lifestage, late brachiolaria (Fig. 4A). Some larvae fed T. erythraeum and DOM reached the early brachiolaria stage (5.4 and 6.3% respectively; Fig. 4A), but most (>70%) were bipinnaria. Unfed larvae had not developed beyond the bipinnaria stage (Fig. 4A). Development of larvae fed P. sulcata was not followed beyond 13 dpf.

At 19 dpf, there were substantial differences in the proportion of abnormal larvae present in different larval diet treatments although ANOVA was unable to detect a significant difference (F2,11 = 3.34; P = 0.074; Fig. 4B). Most unfed larvae were abnormal (66.8%), a greater proportion than for larvae fed DOM (41.7%; Fig. 4B), which had more abnormal larvae present than larvae fed T. erythraeum (16.0%; Fig. 4B). Larvae fed T. erythraeum were more developed than larvae in other treatments, with 11.1% at the early brachiolaria stage and some (~1 in 25) at the late brachiolaria lifestage (Fig. 4B). Some larvae fed DOM were also at the early brachiolaria stage (1.4%; Fig. 4B), but the majority (56.9%) were bipinnaria. Unfed larvae were bipinnaria or abnormal (Fig. 4B).

Survival of larvae in different diet treatments decreased over time, with differences among treatments evident at some days (fig. S4 and table S2). For instance, survival at 13 dpf was significantly different among treatments (mean T. erythraeum = 22.3% ± 1.8 SE; DOM = 17.8% ± 2.4; unfed = 14.3% ± 2.9; P. sulcata = 7.5% ± 2.3; repeated measures ANOVA, table S2; T. erythraeum = DOM > DOM = unfed > unfed = P. sulcata). However, survival at 19 dpf was not different among treatments (mean T. erythraeum = 4.9% ± 1.1 SE; DOM = 3.6% ± 1.4; unfed = 3.2% ± 1.8; survival of larvae fed P. sulcata was not followed beyond 13 dpf; table S2; T. erythraeum = DOM = unfed). Survival of larvae fed T. erythraeum was not followed beyond 19 dpf. At 22 dpf, there were larvae alive in 6 of the 10 replicates fed DOM, but only living larvae in 1 of the 10 unfed replicates. All remaining larvae in unfed and DOM treatments died by 25 dpf without developing to the late brachiolaria lifestage.

DISCUSSION

Larval CoTS ate T. erythraeum CCMP1985, adding to the short list of species known to ingest cyanobacteria of the genus Trichodesmium (8, 1014). This is unexpected given that cyanobacteria are thought to be avoided by zooplankton (14, 21, 22) and previous studies showed larval CoTS to be highly selective feeders, preferring medium-sized phytoplankton (~1 to 20 μm) (32, 33). The filamentous shape of T. erythraeum trichomes did not prevent ingestion by larval CoTS, which ate trichomes from either distal end. It may be the diameter of trichomes, rather than length, that plays an important role in determining their vulnerability to predation. Given that many larvae ingest particles that are substantially larger in diameter than T. erythraeum (3436), Trichodesmium is likely ingested by a greater array of organisms than is presently recognized.

We traced the 15N incorporated into T. erythraeum cells into the tissue of larval CoTS. This 15N could only have been obtained via digestion of 15N-labeled trichomes. Larvae were observed with whole and lysed T. erythraeum cells in their stomachs, and the δ15N signature was greatest in larvae fed labeled trichomes without DOM. Echinoderm larvae have two or three types of stomach cells to digest phytoplankton via ingestion and intracellular digestion of whole phytoplankton cells or secretion of enzymes to digest polysaccharides in cell walls (37, 38). As these cell types likely originated from a common ancestor of deuterostomes (39), larvae with the ability to integrate N from Trichodesmium may be common among marine deuterostome taxa.

CoTS larvae fed T. erythraeum exclusively had similar survival rates to larvae fed a highly nutritious cryptomonad microalga and completed larval development in 19 days. This demonstrates that Trichodesmium provides sufficient nutrition to support normal growth and development of a benthic invertebrate, similar to pelagic copepods that live among Trichodesmium, which also prey on trichomes (8, 1012). Larval banana prawns, P. merguiensis fed Trichodesmium sp., and juvenile pearl oysters, Pinctada maxima fed T. erythraeum, appear to starve (14, 15). Juvenile white shrimp, Penaeus vannamei, die when exposed to a crude extract of mixed Trichodesmium (40). It is unclear why “innutritious” and “toxic” Trichodesmium can be food for CoTS. T. erythraeum is the most common Trichodesmium in the GBR (20), so CoTS from the GBR may be adapted to eat it. T. erythraeum may also not produce toxins (15, 22).

Larval CoTS fed T. erythraeum were on average smaller and took longer to reach morphological competence to settle compared to larvae fed the highly nutritious P. sulcata in this study (13 days) and elsewhere [16 to 19 days; (31, 4143)]. Longer periods spent as larvae may increase exposure to predation (16, 44). Smaller larval size is also linked to poorer fitness in juveniles (45, 46). Nevertheless, 19-day pelagic larval duration (PLD) is within the norm for CoTS (31, 42), and PLD and larval morphologies are likely to be more variable in nature than in benign laboratory conditions. It is also likely that CoTS larvae fed varied densities of Trichodesmium develop at different rates. We raised larvae feeding T. erythraeum at a rate of 20 trichomes ml−1, a density associated with Trichodesmium blooms and >20 times more dense than typical abundances (5, 18, 19). High densities of eukaryotic phytoplankton mimicking blooms on the GBR slow growth of larval CoTS (41, 47). As Trichodesmium does not exist as monocultures in the wild (2, 19, 20), further research is warranted to identify how variations in Trichodesmium densities interact with other phytoplankton foods to determine the success of larval CoTS.

Trichodesmium may excrete half of newly fixed N, primarily as glutamate (23, 24). Lucas (47) posited that larval CoTS use DOM to obtain nutrients in oligotrophic ocean conditions. Subsequent work by Hoegh-Guldberg (48) demonstrated CoTS absorb DOM. It is not clear then why we found larvae exposed to DOM from 15N-enriched T. erythraeum cultures had the same δ15N levels as unfed larvae. Perhaps CoTS were unable to uptake or incorporate N in the forms that were present or were only using DOM as an energy source. Previous studies that have fed DOM to CoTS and other invertebrate larvae indicate that DOM is used as an energy source and if fed exclusively DOM may not provide sufficient nutrition for normal growth and development (4850). Larval size is often correlated with energy reserves (45, 46), and CoTS larvae fed DOM in this study were larger than unfed larvae at the same age. CoTS fed DOM did not develop beyond the early brachiolaria stage and died by 25 dpf. It appears then that CoTS larvae primarily gain nutrients from Trichodesmium by eating trichomes, although uptake of DOM may still be important in providing energy when phytoplankton are scarce.

Given that CoTS larvae can complete their larval phase feeding on Trichodesmium, we raise the possibility that outbreaks of CoTS are linked to increased Trichodesmium abundances over the past century (18, 29, 30). The leading paradigm explaining population irruptions links mass CoTS recruitment events with increased abundances of eukaryotic microalgae associated with terrestrial runoff but has key flaws (25, 51). For instance, there is often poor correlation among floods/nutrient pollution, microalgae blooms, and CoTS population dynamics for many of the regions where population irruptions occur (51). Our results suggest that the success of CoTS larvae could be enhanced by increased Trichodesmium abundances irrespective of the abundances of eukaryotic microalgae that cannot fix N. The ability of CoTS larvae to feed on Trichodesmium to overcome oligotrophic conditions may also imply that recruitment by larval CoTS to the benthic juvenile stage may be more stable over multiple years than is presently known. A steady supply of small numbers of recruits combined with the ability of herbivorous CoTS to stall growth for at least 6.5 years (52, 53) could enable juvenile populations to build up to outbreak densities over time and make a synchronous transition to eating coral when conditions are optimal. Clearly, more work is needed to determine whether Trichodesmium plays a role in CoTS outbreaks. However, we have provided a crucial piece of evidence to support the idea that present-day and predicted future changes in the abundance of Trichodesmium and other cyanobacteria are likely to have far-reaching implications for the ecology of coral reef systems worldwide (2, 18, 54).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study species

Organisms used in this study are excluded from Australian state and federal ethics legislations, and, therefore, no ethics approvals were required or sought. Adult Acanthaster sp. Gervais, 1841 were collected from the GBR near Cairns, QLD, Australia, in November 2021 and maintained in flow-through seawater (25° to 27°C) at the National Marine Science Centre in Coffs Harbour, NSW, Australia, until they were spawned in April 2022 using previously described methods (32, 4244). Gametes from three males and three females were mixed, and resulting embryos were raised in 300-liter tanks until they were used in experiments following previously described methods (31, 41).

T. erythraeum CMP1985 was obtained from the National Center for Marine Algae and Microbiota (USA) and batch-cultured using a modified YBC-II medium under light at ~80 μmol m−1 s−1 (LI-COR, USA) with a 22-hour:2-hour light:dark cycle at ~25°C. The base of the medium was natural seawater obtained through the seawater intake system at the National Marine Science Centre, Southern Cross University (typical parameters: salinity of 34 to 36 and pH 8.0 to 8.05), filtered to 0.45 μm and autoclaved (121°C for 15 min), and allowed to sit for at least 3 days for gases to equilibrate, to which NaH2PO4·H2O solution (6.9 g liter−1), trace metal solution (mixed as per standard YBC-II medium recipe), and vitamin solution (mixed as per standard YBC-II medium recipe) were added at a rate of 1 ml per liter of seawater. P. sulcata CS-412 was obtained from the Australian National Algae Culture Collection [Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Organization (CSIRO) ANACC, Hobart, AUS] and batch-cultured in aerated 17-liter carboys using F medium (CSIRO Modification) under light at >150 μmol m−1 s−1 with a 22-hour:2-hour light:dark cycle at 25° to 31°C.

Larvae ingest Trichodesmium

CoTS larvae (5 dpf) were exposed to seven larval feeding treatments: T. erythraeum at three densities (high, 100 trichomes ml−1; medium, 10 trichomes ml−1; and low, 1 trichomes ml−1), P. sulcata at three densities (high, 1 × 104 cells ml−1; medium, 1 × 103 cells ml−1; and low, 1 × 102 cells ml−1), and an unfed control (Unfed). Each treatment had three replicates, which consisted of a polypropylene vial (Techno Plas P8027UU) containing the larval feeding treatment and FSW (0.22-μm filtered seawater) to a total volume of 30 ml, and 80 CoTS larvae that had not been fed during the preceding 48 hours. Vials were arranged on a benchtop at room temperature (~25°C) and a 22-hour:2-hour (light:dark) photoperiod. In all feeding trials, when observed during the day (lights “on”), individual larval CoTS were, at times, seen swimming throughout the water column, but larvae tended to congregate in the upper third. Trichomes appeared to be evenly distributed throughout the water column, except in the high density treatment (100 trichomes ml−1) where an estimated 20 to 50% of trichomes floated at the surface in most replicates. The distribution of larval CoTS and trichomes were not observed at night (lights “off”).

After 3 and 24 hours, 10 to 15 larvae from each replicate were examined using a fluorescence compound microscope (Olympus BX-53, XCite Series 120Q, MiChrome6 5Pro digital camera) under bright-field, unfiltered UV, and UV-chlorophyll filter (Olympus 19010-AT-FM 1-43/Chlorophyll Longpass) settings. When exposed to UV light, phytoplankton fluoresced red (Fig. 1). The proportion of larvae with material in the digestive tract was calculated for each replicate as the number of larvae with fluorescing material in their digestive tract out of the total number of larvae examined. Unfed larvae did not have fluorescing material in their digestive tract at any time. Data were statistically analyzed by ANOVA (Supplementary Text).

Larvae incorporate N fixed by Trichodesmium

Initial trials confirmed that the addition of 15N-N2 gas to sealed culture vessels resulted in the 15N enrichment of T. erythraeum cells and the DOM exuded by these cells. To label T. erythraeum with 15N, 50 ml of growth medium (modified YBC-II) was added to 50 ml of T. erythraeum culture in 100-ml serum vials. The headspace within each vial was degassed under vacuum, and ~20 ml of clean 15N-N2 (>98%; Cambridge Isotope Laboratories) was added. Vials remained sealed for ~72 hour, after which labeled T. erythraeum trichomes were separated via gentle filtration (0.45-μm polycarbonate). The labeled trichomes were washed three times with FSW and resuspended in fresh FSW. The filtrate containing 15N-labeled DOM was kept for subsequent incubations. T. erythraeum trichomes from unlabeled cultures were prepared in the same way as 15N-labeled trichomes.

CoTS larvae (8 dpf) were exposed to five larval feeding treatments: 15N-labeled trichomes, 15N-labeled DOM, the combination of 15N-labeled DOM and 15N-labeled trichomes, unlabeled trichomes, and FSW only (Unfed). Each treatment had five replicates, which consisted of a polypropylene vial (Techno Plas P8027UU) containing the larval feeding treatment and FSW to a total volume of 30 ml, and 50 CoTS larvae that had not been fed for 24 hours. Labeled or unlabeled trichomes were added to achieve a density of 100 trichomes ml−1. Replicates in the labeled DOM and combined DOM-trichome treatments had 15 ml of DOM and 15 ml of FSW. The Unfed treatment had 30 ml of FSW only. The vials were sealed and opened every 12 hours for gas exchange. Larvae were exposed to the larval feeding treatments for 48 hours, after which larvae were moved to new vials and the seawater was exchanged for new FSW in all treatments via reverse filtration. The larvae were kept in clean FSW for 48 hours until their digestive tracts were empty when checked microscopically and then transferred via pipette to 2-ml Eppendorf tubes, rinsed three times in FSW, freeze dried, and stored at −20°C before 15N compositional analysis.

Given that the small amount of N associated with the CoTS larvae, a 15N analysis procedure previously used for determining the δ15N of dissolved organic N was adopted (55). Briefly, larval samples were oxidized with K2S2O8 and the δ15N of the resulting NO3 was determined via the denitrifier protocol (56). The same procedure was used to measure the δ15N of the DOM and the T. erythraeum cells (labeled and unlabeled). Data were statistically analyzed by ANOVA (Supplementary Text).

Larvae fed Trichodesmium develop normally

Actively swimming CoTS larvae (5 dpf) were placed into 40 1-liter rearing containers with FSW (26°C, 1-μm–filtered) at an initial density of 0.6 larvae ml−1. Each container had gentle aeration from the base (31, 41, 42), which kept larvae and trichomes evenly mixed. FSW was exchanged daily, and containers exchanged every 5 days. Containers were fed once per day with one of the four diet treatments: P. sulcata (5 × 104 cells ml−1), T. erythraeum (20 trichomes ml−1; mean trichome length = 357.4 μm ± 29.9 SE, n = 24; mean number of cells per trichome = 51.9 ± 5.8 SE, n = 17), T. erythraeum culture that had been filtered (0.45 μm) to remove trichomes, added at a volume equivalent to the amount of T. erythraeum culture added to achieve a density of 20 trichomes ml−1 (typically 10 to 25 ml per replicate), or were not fed (n = 10 rearing containers per treatment).

The density of larvae in each container was measured at 7 dpf and every 3 days thereafter until 25 dpf using previously described methods (31, 4143). Survival at each time point was calculated for each replicate using density values and reported as a percentage of the original density present at the beginning of the experiment. Development was monitored daily from 11 dpf and assessed following previously described methods in all replicates at 13 and 19 dpf when larvae in some treatments first reached the late brachiolaria stage indicative of morphological competence to settle (31, 4143). At 10 and 16 dpf, ~20 larvae from each container were haphazardly collected, relaxed in 7% MgCl2 and FSW, and then fixed in 15% formalin. Fixed larvae were photographed within 7 days, and the photographs were used to measure length, width, length of ciliated bands, and area of normal larvae following previously described methods (31, 41, 43). Data were statistically analyzed by ANOVA (Supplementary Text).

Acknowledgments

We thank the Australian Marine Tourist Operators Association for assistance in obtaining adult CoTS and the anonymous reviewers for comments that improved the manuscript.

Funding: This work was supported by the Australian Research Council (ARC) via an ARC Discovery Indigenous grant IN2000100026 (B.M. and S.A.D.), ARC Discovery Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Award IN2000100026 (B.M.), and ARC Discovery grant DP170100734 (D.E.).

Author contributions: Conceptualization: S.A.D., D.E., B.M., and C.L. Funding acquisition: B.M., S.A.D., and D.E. Supervision: S.A.D., B.M., and D.E. Project administration: S.A.D., B.M., and D.E. Resources: B.M., D.E., and S.A.D. Methodology: B.M., D.E., S.A.D., and C.L. Investigation: B.M., D.E., and C.L. Data curation: B.M. and C.L. Validation: D.E. Formal Analysis: B.M. and C.L. Visualization: B.M. and D.E. Writing—original draft: B.M., D.E., C.L., and S.A.D. Writing—review and editing: B.M., D.E., C.L., and S.A.D.

Competing interests: B.M. reports funding support from the Australian Research Council DAATSIA Discovery Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Award IN2000100026. The funder had no role in the design of experiments, collection of data, or decision to publish. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Research data and copies of original photographs used to create the figures are freely available from the online repository figshare: doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.22302541.v3

Supplementary Materials

This PDF file includes:

Supplementary Text

Figs. S1 to S4

Tables S1 and S2

References

sciadv.ado2682_sm.pdf (990.1KB, pdf)

REFERENCES AND NOTES

  • 1.Arrigo K. R., Marine microorganisms and global nutrient cycles. Nature 437, 349–355 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bergman B., Sandh G., Lin S., Larsson J., Carpenter E. J., Trichodesmium–A widespread marine cyanobacterium with unusual nitrogen fixation properties. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 37, 286–302 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Villareal T., Carpenter E., Buoyancy regulation and the potential for vertical migration in the oceanic cyanobacterium Trichodesmium. Microb. Ecol. 45, 1–10 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.White A. E., Spitz Y. H., Letelier R. M., Modeling carbohydrate ballasting by Trichodesmium spp. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 323, 35–45 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Capone D. C., Subramaniam A., Montoya J. P., Voss M., Humborg C., Johansen A. M., Siefert R. L., Carpenter E. J., An extensive bloom of the N2-fixing cyanobacterium Trichodesmium erythraeum in the central Arabian Sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 172, 281–292 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dupouy C., Neveux J., Subramaniam A., Mulholland M. R., Montoya J. P., Campbell L., Carpenter E. J., Capone D. G., Satellite captures Trichodesmium blooms in the southwestern tropical Pacific. EOS Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 81, 13–16 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Blondeau-Patissier D., Brando V. E., Lønborg C., Leahy S. M., Dekker A. G., Phenology of Trichodesmium spp. blooms in the Great Barrier Reef lagoon, Australia, from the ESA-MERIS 10-year mission. PLOS ONE 13, e0208010 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Post A. F., Dedej Z., Gottlieb R., Li H., Thomas D. N., El-Absawi M., El-Naggar A., El-Gharabawi M., Sommer U., Spatial and temporal distribution of Trichodesmium spp. in the stratified Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 239, 241–250 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Karl D., Michaels A., Bergman B., Capone D., Carpenter E., Letelier R., Lipschultz F., Paerl H., Sigman D., Stal L., Dinitrogen fixation in the world’s oceans. Biogeochemistry 57, 47–98 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Roman M. R., Ingestion of the blue-green alga Trichodesmium by the harpactacoid copepod, Macrosetella gracilis. Limnol. Oceanogr. 23, 1245–1248 (1978). [Google Scholar]
  • 11.O’Neil J. M., Roman M. R., Ingestion of the cyanobacterium Trichodesmium spp. by pelagic harpacticoid copepods Macrosetella, Miracia and Oculosetella. Hydrobiologia 292–293, 235–240 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.O’Neil J. M., The colonial cyanobacterium Trichodesmium as a physical and nutritional substrate for the harpacticoid copepod Macrosetella gracilis. J. Plankton Res. 20, 43–59 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.J. M. O’Neil, M. R. Roman, in Grazers and Associated Organisms of Trichodesmium in Marine Pelagic Cyanobacteria: Trichodesmium and Other Diazotrophs, E. J. Carpenter, D. G. Capone, J. G. Rueter, Eds. (Springer, 1992), pp. 61–73. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Preston N. P., Burford M. A., Stenzel D. J., Effects of Trichodesmium spp. blooms on penaeid prawn larvae. Mar. Biol. 131, 671–679 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Negri A. P., Bunter O., Jones B., Llewellyn L., Effects of the bloom-forming alga Trichodesmium erythraeum on the pearl oyster Pinctada maxima. Aquaculture 232, 91–102 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Thorson G., Reproductive and larval ecology of marine bottom invertebrates. Biol. Rev. 25, 1–45 (1950). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mileikovsky S. A., Types of larval development in marine bottom invertebrates, their distribution and ecological significance: A re-evaluation. Mar. Biol. 10, 193–213 (1971). [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bell P. R. F., Elmetri I., Uwins P., Nitrogen fixation by Trichodesmium spp. in the Central and Northern Great Barrier Reef Lagoon: Relative importance of the fixed-nitrogen load. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 186, 119–126 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rodier M., Le Borgne R., Population dynamics and environmental conditions affecting Trichodesmium spp. (filamentous cyanobacteria) blooms in the south–west lagoon of New Caledonia. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 358, 20–32 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Messer L. F., Brown M. V., Furnas M. J., Carney R. L., McKinnon A. D., Seymour J. R., Diversity and activity of diazotrophs in Great Barrier Reef surface waters. Front. Microbiol. 8, 10.3389/fmicb.2017.0096 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.de Bernardi R., Giussani G., Are blue-green algae a suitable food for zooplankton? An overview. Hydrobiologia 200–201, 29–41 (1990). [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hawser S. P., O’Neil J. M., Roman M. R., Codd G. A., Toxicity of blooms of the cyanobacterium Trichodesmium to zooplankton. J. Appl. Phycol. 4, 79–86 (1992). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Capone D. G., Ferrier M. D., Carpenter E. J., Amino acid cycling in colonies of the planktonic marine cyanobacterium Trichodesmium thiebautii. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60, 3989–3995 (1994). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Glibert P. M., Bronk D. A., Release of dissolved organic nitrogen by marine diazotrophic Cyanobacteria, Trichodesmium spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60, 3996–4000 (1994). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Deaker D. J., Byrne M., Crown of thorns starfish life-history traits contribute to outbreaks, a continuing concern for coral reefs. Emerg. Top. Life Sci. 6, 67–79 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.L. M. DeVantier, T. J. Done, “Inferring past outbreaks of the crown-of-thorns seastar from scar patterns on coral heads” in Geological Approaches to Coral Reef Ecology, vol. 192, R. B. Aronson, Ed. (Springeer, 2007), pp. 85–125. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fabricius K. E., Okaji K., Three lines of evidence to link outbreaks of the crown-of-thorns seastar Acanthaster planci to the release of larval food limitation. Coral Reefs 29, 593–605 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Brodie J., Fabricius K., De’ath G., Okaji K., Are increased nutrient inputs responsible for more outbreaks of crown-of-thorns starfish? An appraisal of the evidence. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 51, 266–278 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Erler D. V., Farid H. T., Glaze T. D., Carlson-Perret N. L., Lough J. M., Coral skeletons reveal the history of nitrogen cycling in the coastal great barrier reef. Nat. Commun. 11, 1500 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bell P. R. F., Analysis of satellite imagery using a simple algorithm supports evidence that Trichodesmium supplies a significant new nitrogen load to the GBR lagoon. Ambio 50, 1200–1210 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wolfe K., Graba-Landry A., Dworjanyn S. A., Byrne M., Superstars: Assessing nutrient thresholds for enhanced larval success of Acanthaster planci, a review of the evidence. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 116, 307–314 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ayukai T., Ingestion of ultraplankton by the planktonic larvae of the crown-of-thorns starfish, Acanthaster planci. Biol. Bull. 186, 90–100 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Okaji K., Ayukai T., Lucas J. S., Selective feeding by larvae of the crown-of-thorns starfish, Acanthaster planci (L.). Coral Reefs 16, 47–50 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bolton T. F., Havenhand J. N., Physiological versus viscosity-induced effects of an acute reduction in water temperature on microsphere ingestion by trochophore larvae of the serpulid polychaete Galeolaria caespitosa. J. Plankton Res. 20, 2153–2164 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cole M., Lindeque P., Fileman E., Halsband C., Goodhead R., Moger J., Galloway T. S., Microplastic ingestion by zooplankton. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 6646–6655 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kaposi K. L., Mos B., Kelaher B. P., Dworjanyn S. A., Ingestion of microplastic has limited impact on a marine larva. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 1638–1645 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Burke R. D., Structure of the digestive tract of the pluteus larva of Dendraster excentricus (Echinodermata: Echinoida). Zoomorphology 98, 209–225 (1981). [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nezlin L. P., Yushin V. V., The digestive tract of the echinopluteus of Echinocardium cordatum (Echinodermata, Echinoida): Its ultrastructure and innervation. Can. J. Zool. 72, 2090–2099 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Annunziata A. R., Andrikou C., Perillo M., Cuomo C., Arnone M. I., Development and evolution of gut structures: From molecules to function. Cell Tissue Res. 377, 445–458 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sacilotto Detoni A. M., Fonseca Costa L. D., Pacheco L. A., Yunes J. S., Toxic Trichodesmium bloom occurrence in the southwestern South Atlantic Ocean. Toxicon 110, 51–55 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wolfe K., Graba-Landry A., Dworjanyn S. A., Byrne M., Larval starvation to satiation: Influence of nutrient regime on the success of Acanthaster planci. PLOS ONE 10, e0122010 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Pratchett M. S., Dworjanyn S., Mos B., Caballes C. F., Thompson C. A., Blowes S., Larval survivorship and settlement of crown-of-thorns starfish (Acanthaster cf. solaris) at varying algal cell densities. Diversity 9, 2 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mos B., Mesic N., Dworjanyn S. A., Variable food alters responses of larval crown-of-thorns starfish to ocean warming but not acidification. Commun. Biol. 6, 639 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rumrill S. S., Natural mortality of marine invertebrate larvae. Ophelia 32, 163–198 (1990). [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Pechenik J. A., Wendt D. E., Jarrett J. N., Metamorphosis is not a new Beginning. Bioscience 48, 901–910 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Marshall D. J., Bolton T. F., Keough M. J., Offspring size affects the post-metamorphic performance of a colonial marine invertebrate. Ecology 84, 3131–3137 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lucas J. S., Quantitative studies of feeding and nutrition during larval development of the coral reef asteroid Acanthaster planci (L.). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 65, 173–193 (1982). [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hoegh-Guldberg O., Uptake of dissolved organic matter by larval stage of the crown-of-thorns starfish Acanthaster planci. Mar. Biol. 120, 55–63 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Manahan D. T., Crisp D. J., The role of dissolved organic material in the nutrition of pelagic larvae: Amino acid uptake by bivalve Veligers. Am. Zool. 22, 635–646 (1982). [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Jaeckle W. B., Manahan D. T., Feeding by a “nonfeeding” larva: Uptake of dissolved amino acids from seawater by lecithotrophic larvae of the gastropod Haliotis rufescens. Mar. Biol. 103, 87–94 (1989). [Google Scholar]
  • 51.M. S. Pratchett, C. F. Caballes, J. A. Rivera-Posada, H. P. A. Sweatman, “Limits to understanding and managing outbreaks of crown-of- thorns starfish (Acanthaster spp.)” in Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review, vol. 52, R. N. Hughes, D. J. Hughes, I P. Smith, Eds. (Taylor & Francis, 2014), pp. 133–200. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Deaker D. J., Agüera A., Lin H.-A., Lawson C., Budden C., Dworjanyn S. A., Mos B., Byrne M., The hidden army: Corallivorous crown-of-thorns seastars can spend years as herbivorous juveniles. Biol. Lett. 16, 20190849 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Deaker D. J., Mos B., Lin H.-A., Lawson C., Budden C., Dworjanyn S. A., Byrne M., Diet flexibility and growth of the early herbivorous juvenile crown-of-thorns sea star, implications for its boom-bust population dynamics. PLOS ONE 15, e0236142 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Henson S. A., Cael B. B., Allen S. R., Dutkiewicz S., Future phytoplankton diversity in a changing climate. Nat. Commun. 12, 5372 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Knapp A. N., Sigman D. M., Lipschultz F., N isotopic composition of dissolved organic nitrogen and nitrate at the Bermuda Atlantic Time-series Study site. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 19, GB002320 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sigman D. M., Casciotti K. L., Andreani M., Barford C., Galanter M., Böhlke J. K., A bacterial method for the nitrogen isotopic analysis of nitrate in seawater and freshwater. Anal. Chem. 73, 4145–4153 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Anderson M. J., A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol. 26, 32–46 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  • 58.A. Field, Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (Sage Publications Ltd., 2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 59.G. P. Quinn, M. J. Keough, Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Text

Figs. S1 to S4

Tables S1 and S2

References

sciadv.ado2682_sm.pdf (990.1KB, pdf)

Articles from Science Advances are provided here courtesy of American Association for the Advancement of Science

RESOURCES