Skip to main content
ZooKeys logoLink to ZooKeys
. 2015 Nov 9;(533):63–98. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.533.6184

A catalogue of the scaleworm genus Lepidonotus (Polynoidae, Polychaeta) from South America, with two new records for Brazilian waters

José Eriberto De Assis 1, Rafael Justino de Brito 2, Martin Lindsey Christoffersen 2, José Roberto Botelho de Souza 1
PMCID: PMC4669924  PMID: 26668541

Abstract Abstract

The genus Lepidonotus is the largest in number of species within the Polynoidae, with more than 70 described species and subspecies. A catalogue of 18 nominal species and subspecies of Lepidonotus from South America is provided, with valid names, synonyms and original citations. Redescriptions and illustrations of two species based on new specimens collected along the littoral of the State of Paraíba, northeastern Brazil are included. Lepidonotus carinulatus and Lepidonotus natalensis are reported for the first time for Brazilian waters. A comparative table of characters for all reported species and subspecies of Lepidonotus from South America is provided.

Keywords: Benthos, Annelida, catalogue, new record, distribution

Introduction

The scaleworm Lepidonotus belongs to the family Polynoidae, and contains more than 70 described species (Read and Fauchald 2015). They have been found from the intertidal to the bathyal zones, in diverse marine environments (Day 1967, Fauchald 1977, Salazar-Silva 2006, Wehe 2006).

Leach (1816) established the genus Lepidonotus for the species Aphrodita clava Montagu (1808), which had been described earlier. This author did not provide identifying characters of the genus, which led to subsequent confusion in the literature, causing many synonyms. Later, Seidler (1923) made a very extensive review of the Lepidonotinae, presenting descriptions and keys to more than 50 species of Lepidonotus, but there are almost no illustrations to supplement the descriptions, nor is it clear from the text which specimens or types were examined (Wehe 2006). However, Wehe (2006) clarified that this paper is invaluable in providing base-line data and access to the literature on lepidonotid genera.

Lepidonotus has a short body with 26 segments, is dorsoventrally flattened, and subrectangular in the cross-section. The prostomium is bilobed, extending anteriorly into the ceratophores of the terminally-attached lateral antennae. The antennae and cirri are smooth. A facial tubercle is present; the buccal segment is with or without nuchal fold. Twelve pairs of elytra are present on segments 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21 and 23; elytra are with or without tubercles and papillae. The notopodia small or vestigial, unidentate notochaetae are short. The neuropodia are large, with or without an acicular lobe; the neurochaetae are stout, long, with subdistal spines and unidentate or occasionally bidentate tips (Fauchald 1977, Amaral and Nonato 1982, Ruff 1995, Wehe 2006).

In this paper, a catalogue of the genus Lepidonotus from South America is provided, and Lepidonotus carinulatus and Lepidonotus natalensis are redescribed, collected in the intertidal region of the State of Paraíba, northeastern Brazil. These two species are reported for the first time for Brazilian waters.

Material and methods

The species accounts in the catalogue are given alphabetically. Each account contains author, publication year, number of pages, figures, types, and deposition numbers, together with the abbreviation of the museum or institution in which the type material is deposited, type locality with coordinatesand geographical distribution, when available. In some cases, remarks on taxonomic status of somes species are included. Synonyms are listed chronologically. A comparative table for all reported species and subspecies from South American is provided (Table 1).

Table 1.

Comparative table for all species and subspecies of the genus Lepidonotus from South America.

Characters
Species Prostomium Palps Nuchal nodules Posterior part of the elytra Microtubercule Macrotubercule Notochaetae Neurochaetae
Lepidonotus arenosus Rounded Smooth Present Numerous posterior papillae Small papillae egg-shaped Bigger central papillae egg-shaped Thin capillaries in all chaetigers Stout, curved, with spinous row, tip bidentate
Lepidonotus brasiliensis Rounded Smooth Absent Numerous thin papillae Small papillae lunar crate-shaped Big papillae mushroom-shaped Spinous ciliated capillaries Stout, curved, with spinous rows, tip unidentate
Lepidonotus brasiliensis laevis Rounded Smooth Absent Numerous papillae in posterior elytra Small papillae lunar crate-shaped Big papillae mushroom-shaped Thin capillaries, with 3 ciliated filaments Stout, straight, smooth blade, unidentate
Lepidonotus caeruleus Longer than wide Papillate Absent Numerous short papillae on posterior portion Conical Absent Longer capillaries shorter, curved and dentate; shorter capillaries long and barbed Long, strongly curved,with spinous row, tip bidentate
Lepidonotus carinulatus Rounded to hexagonal, buccal segment with two nuchal nodules With 8 rows of longitudi nal papillae Present Papillae along external edge Small warty tubercles Carinate tubercles scattered Spinous, superior row slender, serrate on convex side Stout, falcate, subdistally thickened, few rows of spines, tip bidentate
Lepidonotus crosslandi Rounded, with posterior nuchal fold Smooth Absent Numerous short posterior papillae Small and thin tubercles Absent Fairly numerous capillaries Stout, slightly curved tip, with a row of spines, bidentate in two chaetigers
Lepidonotus crosslandi peruana Rounded Smooth Present Numerous short posterior papillae Small and thin tubercles Absent Fairly numerous capillaries Stout, tip slightly curved, with rows of strong spines, bidentate in all chaetigers
Lepidonotus furcillatus Rounded With numerous papillae Absent Digitiform papillae with central dark spot Small and conical Small, nodular Curved, short, smooth Stout, weakly ornamented, bidentate
Lepidonotus hupferi Rounded to hexagonal Smooth Absent Fringe covering posterior part of elytra Rounded, surface rough Warty and pointed Capillaries spinous in all chetigers Stout, spinous rows with fine teeth, bidentate
Lepidonotus margaritaceus Convex, posterior rounded Smooth Absent Slender papillae on posterior border Small granules Absent Short, numerous rows of small spines Stout, numerous rows of distal spines, unidentate
Lepidonotus natalensis Slightly hexagonal With 8 rows of Longitud-inal papillae Long digitiform external papillae and group of infero-central papillae Crown-like tip or without tip Crown-like tip in central region Spinous, superior row slender, tips fine, pointed Stout, falcate, subdistally slightly thickened, few rows of spines, tip unidentate
Lepidonotus nesophilus Convex, posterior rounded smooth Absent Absent Hemisferical, spinous Long spines Spinous capillaries in all chaetigers Stout, with spinous rows, bidentate
Lepidonotus panamensis Largely hidden, convex lobe projecting over posterior half A few papillae Numerous posterior papillae and tulf of long central papillae Numerous small spines on centre Excavate disk, cap covered by many spines Chaetae shorter, falcate Long, stout, with curved tip, unidentate
Lepidonotus savygni Rounded Smooth Absent Slender short posterior papillae Numerous small warty-shaped spines Warty-shaped Spinous capillaries in all chaetigers Long, stout, tip curved, unidentate
Lepidonotus sublevis Slightly longer than wide Papillate Absent Additional posterior papillae Conical, without areola Absent Spinous capillaries in all chaetigers Stout, few spinous rows, tip slightly hooked
Lepidonotus teinuetosus Oblong, no cephalic peaks Smooth Absent Slender posterior papillae Blunt or somewhat warty tips Very small, conical or globular Slender, numerous rows of small spines and capillary tips tapering Stouter, falcate, numerous distal spine rows, d mostly unidentate, few spines minutely bidentate
Lepidonotus tomentosus Rounded Smooth Absent Numerous large posterior papillae Small warty tips Numerous warts on central elytra Spinous capillaries in all chaetigers; Stout, with spinous row, bidentate
Lepidonotus variabilis Rounded Smooth Absent Numerous large posterior papillae Small, cylindrical Absent Spinous capillaries in all chaetigers Stout, with spinous rows, secondary teeth small, bidentate

Specimens were collected by handpicking during low tides from the intertidal region (0.0–0.2 m) and by snorkeling to a depth of up to 5 meters along the coast of the state of Paraíba. Specimens were fixed in formaldehyde (10% in seawater), and later rinsed with fresh water and transferred to 70% ethanol. General structures were observed with Stereomicroscope Olympus Nikon SMZ800. Chaetae and elytrae were observed with an Olympus BX41 compound microscope. All illustrations were drawn using a camera lucida, and photographs were edited in Photoshop, PhotoScape and CorelDraw X7. Specimens are deposited in the ‘Coleção de Invertebrados Paulo Young’, Departamento de Sistemática e Ecologia da Universidade Federal da Paraíba’, Brazil.

The nomenclature of appendages and other characteristics of polynoids mentioned in this paper follow Tebble and Chambers (1982), Hanley and Burke (1991), Ruff (1995), Imajima (1997), and Wehe (2006).

The following abbreviations are used in the text:

AMNH

BMNH

LIPY

MNHN Poly Type

NCB

PMNH

POLY-UFPB

SSM, Naturhistoriska

USNM

ZUEC-POL

ZMB

ZMH

Results

Family Polynoidae Malmgren, 1867

Genus. Lepidonotus

Leach, 1816

Type species.

Aphrodita clava Montagu, 1808

Leach 1816, Hanley and Burke 1991, Ruff 1995, Chambers and Muir 1997, Barnich and Fiege 2003.

Diagnosis.

Body short, arched, with 26 segments. Bilobed prostomium extending anteriorly into ceratophores of terminally-attached lateral antennae. Antennae and cirri smooth. Facial tubercle present; buccal segment with or without nuchal fold. Twelve pairs of elytra on segments 2, 4, 5, 7.... 21 and 23. Notopodia small or vestigial; unidentate notochaetae short, slender, spinose, or notochaetae capillaries sometimes present. Neuropodia large, with or without acicular lobe; neurochaetae stout, long, with subdistal spines and unidentate or occasionally bidentate tips.

Remarks.

The genus Lepidonotus contains more than 70 species distributed worldwide (Ruff 1995). However, only 18 species and subspecies have been reported for South America, including the two new records described here.

1. Lepidonotus arenosus

Ehlers, 1901b

Holotype.

NCB Verm. 3643.

Type locality.

Calbuco, Chile.

Distribution.

Chile and New Caledonia.

2. Lepidonotus brasiliensis

(Quatrefages, 1866)

Syntype of Polynoe brasilienis.

MNHN Poly Type 78.

Type locality.

Bahia, Brazil.

Distribution.

Known only from the type-locality in Bahia.

3. Lepidonotus brasiliensis laevis

Rullier & Amoureux, 1979

Syntype.

MNHN Poly Type: 1304.

Type locality.

Bahia, Brazil.

Distribution.

This species occurs along the Brazilian littoral.

Remarks.

Solís-Weiss et al. (2006) considered only the species, however, in Read and Fauchald (2015), the status as subspecies is considered valid.

4. Lepidonotus caeruleus

Kinberg, 1856

Holotype.

ZUEC-POL 2919.

Type locality.

off Rio de Janeiro-Brazil.

Distribution.

Western Pacific from Japan. Eastern Pacific from Alaska to California. Southwestern Atlantic from Paraíba to São Paulo. 7.3–932 m (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Map showing the distribution of genus Lepidonotus in South America: 1 Lepidonotus arenosus 2 Lepidonotus brasiliensis 3 Lepidonotus brasiliensis laevis 4 Lepidonotus caeruleus 5 Lepidonotus carinulatus 6 Lepidonotus crosslandi 7 Lepidonotus crosslandi peruana 8 Lepidonotus furcillatus 9 Lepidonotus hupferi 10 Lepidonotus margaritaceus 11 Lepidonotus natalensis 12 Lepidonotus nesophilus 13 Lepidonotus panamensis 14 Lepidonotus savignyi 15 Lepidonotus sublevis 16 Lepidonotus tenuisetosus 17 Lepidonotus tomentosus 18 Lepidonotus viriabilis.

Biology.

The species occurs in colonies of the sponge Zygomycale parishii (Bowerbank, 1875), in colonies of the bryozoan Schizoporella errata (Waters, 1879), on tubes of sabellariid Neosabellaria cementarium (Moore, 1906), in tubes of cirratulid Dodecaceriapacifica, with the barnacle Balanus nubilis (Darwin, 1854), and the mussel Volsella modiolus. In rhodolith beds.

Remarks.

Lepidonotus caeruleus presents a wide distribution. Futher studies are required to enable us to understand if it is a cryptogenic species, because there are no studies to show that it represents a species complex, and its origin was not determined.

5. Lepidonotus carinulatus

Grube, 1869

Figures 2 , 3

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

A Anterior end of Lepidonotus carinulatus showing the dark ring in the antennae and tentacular cirrus (anterodorsal view of the prostomium) B Anterior end showing the dorsal anus in the last chaetigerous segment. Scale bars: 1 mm (A, B). (p, palp; ma, median antennae; la, lateral antennae; tc, tentacular cirri; pr, prostomium; nn, nuchal nodules; dc. Dorsal cirrus; e, elytra; pl, papillae; a, anus; ac, anal cirri.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Lepidonotus carinulatus A pair of nuchal nodules on 2nd segment in dorsal anterior view B right parapodia of 4th segment, dorsal view C notochaetae, dorsal view D neurochaetae, ventral view E first right elytra, dorsal view F–G macrotubercle H microtubercles I right elytra of 5th segment J macrotubercle. Scale bars: 1 mm (A); 0,5 mm (B–D), 0.05 mm (E–J).

Diagnosis.

With two nuchal nodules and without nuchal folds; black pigmentation on antennae, cirrophores and tentaculophores; elytra with dark pigmentation; elytral surface reticulate, with oval to rounded macro- and microtubercles, anterior ones flattened, smooth or carinate, central and posterolateral ones warty; margin with fringing papillae; neurochaetae bidentate.

Description.

Body elongated, flattened dorsoventrally, subrectangular in cross-section; 2 mm in length, including palps and pygidial cirri; 26 chaetigerous segments, and pygidium (Figure 2a–b). Prostomium bilobed, rounded to hexagonal, lateral antenna with terminal insertion (Figure 3a). Two pairs of eyes; anterior pair dorsolateral, near widest portion of prostomium, posterior pair near posterior end of prostomium, converging towards midline, buccal segment without nuchal fold, but with pair of nuchal nodules (Figure 3a–b). Median and lateral antennae, tentacular and dorsal cirri with two dark rings (Figure 2a), both having subdistal swelling, culminating abruptly in sharp point; ceratophores cylindrical, median antenna larger than lateral antennae. Pair of palps, slightly smaller than median antenna, culminating in thin point, with 8 longitudinal rows of papillae.

Tentacular segment with two pairs of cylindrical tentaculophores, with three prostomial chaetae on anterodorsal bases. Buccal cirri larger than ventral cirri, with cylindrical cirrophores. Pharynx with nine pairs of papillae and two pairs of maxillae. Facial tubercle present. Dorsal cirri with same coloration as median antenna, larger than ventral cirri, with cylindrical cirrophores.

Parapodia biramous (Figure 3b), prechaetal lobe quadrate or subtriangular, postchaetal lobe short and subtriangular, both with acicula; short notopodia on anterodorsal side of neuropodia. Notochaetae spinous, superior row slender, serrated on convex side (Figure 3c). Neuropodia large, truncate, distally cleft with prechaetal lobe slightly longer than poschaetal lobe. Neurochaetae stouter than notochaetae, falcate, subdistally thickened, with several rows of spines, distal spines usually much larger than basal ones, and bidentate tips with small secondary tooth (Figure 3d).

Twelve pairs of elytra, covering dorsum entirely, with dark-brown pigmentation; pairs until last chaetiger segment following order: 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21 and 23; long papillae along external edge. First three pairs of elytrae more ornate, with tubercles (Figure 3e); on 11th and 12th pair with ornamentation similar to that in first pair. Most carinate macrotubercles in central region (Figure 3f–g), surrounded by microtubercles (Figure 3h); after 4th or 5th pair (Figure 3i), small warty tubercles give impression of smooth elytra (Figure 3j).

Nephridial papillae starting from chaetiger 7, with peduncular aspect. Short ventral cirri with thin tip; pair of long anal cirri with same coloration as median antenna; dorsal anus in last chaetiger segment (Figure 2b).

Habitat.

Recorded between the intertidal and 60 m; elsewhere reported down to 200 m (Hartmann-Schröder and Hartmann 1991, Wehe 2006).

Syntype.

ZMB 1071.

Type locality.

Bohol, Philippines.

Distribution.

Red Sea, Arabian Sea: Socotra Archipelago, Gulf of Oman, Arabian Gulf. Elsewhere: Indo-West Pacific: Madagascar, Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Philippines, Hong Kong, South China Sea, Australia, New Caledonia, Japan (Willey 1905, Fauvel 1953, Hanley and Burke 1991, Hanley 1992, Imajima 1997, Barnich et al. 2004).

New records: Coast of Paraíba, Brazil: Pedra da Galé, Pitimbú (07°28'17"S, 34°47'26"W), POLY–UFPB 1501; Rio Mamanguape (06°48'44"S, 34°54'48"W), POLY–UFPB 1502, 1503.

Remarks.

Zenetos et al. (2010) assigned Lepidonotus carinulatus as an exotic species with an origin in the Indo-Pacific/Red Sea. Its establishment success in the Mediterranean is questionable, because its description, based on local specimens, was insufficient. It is an exotic species in Brazilian waters with casual establishment success; because only the present records are known, it is presumed to be non-established in the Mediterranean area (Zenetos et al. 2010).

6. Lepidonotus crosslandi

Monro, 1928

Holotype.

USNM 54378.

Type locality.

Balboa and Taboga, Panama.

Distribution.

El Salvador to Peru.

7. Lepidonotus crosslandi peruana

Hartmann-Schröder, 1962b

Holotype.

ZMH.

Type locality.

Callao and Bahia de Independencia, Peru

Distribution.

Presently known only from Peru. 0–112.8 m.

8. Lepidonotus furcillatus

Ehlers, 1901b

Syntypes.

NCB 3682, 3701.

Type locality.

Tumbes and Cavancha, Chile.

Distribution.

Western Pacific from Australia and New Zealand. East Pacific from Colombia to Chile and Galapagos Islands.

9. Lepidonotus hupferi

Augener, 1918

Holotype

Lepidonotus hupferi. Fauvel, 1950: 345 (Senegal). ZMH V-530

Type locality.

Gold Coast, western Africa, Ghana.

Distribution.

Eastern Atlantic from Senegal and Cape Verde. Western Pacific from New Caledonia and Australia. Eastern Pacific from Mexico to Ecuador. 10–30 m.

Remarks.

Lepidonotus hupferi presents a wide distribution. Futher studies are required to enable us to understand if it is a cryptogenic species, because there are no studies to show that it is a species complex, and its origin was not determined

10. Lepidonotus margaritaceus

Kinberg, 1856

Holotype.

SSM.

Type locality.

Guayaquil, Ecuador.

Distribution.

Known only from the type material from Ecuador.

11. Lepidonotus natalensis

Day, 1951

Figures 4 , 5

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

A Anterior end of Lepidonotus natalensis showing the pigmentation of antennae and tentacular cirri B dorsal anus in the 23rd segment chaetigerous, dorsal posterior view. Scale bars: 1 mm (A–B). (p, palp; ma, median antennae; la, lateral antennae; tc, tentacular cirri; pr, prostomium; nn, nuchal nodules; dc, dorsal cirrus; e, elytra; pl, papillae; a, anus; ac, anal cirri.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Lepidonotus natalensis A anterodorsal view of prostomium B second segment showing the anterior peak C right parapodia of 4th segment, dorsal view D notochaetae, dorsal view E neurochaetae, ventral view F first right elytra, dorsal view G macrotubercle H microtubercles I right elytra of 6th segment J macrotubercle K group of papillae. Scale bars: 1 mm (A); 0,5 mm (B–D); 0.05 mm (B–D).

  • Lepidonotus natalensis Day, 1951; fig. 1 e–l [removed from synonymy with Lepidonotus tenuisetosus (sensu Day 1967)].

  • Lepidonotus tenuisetosus Fauvel, 1927: 414 [not Gravier, 1902].

Diagnosis.

Without nuchal fold; some elytrae with group of papillae in center, dark pigmentation and small tubercles after 4th or 5th pair, giving impression of smooth elytra; elytra margin and surface with long slender, digitiform papillae; notochaetae partially threadlike; neurochaetae unidentate.

Description.

Body elongate, flattened dorsoventrally; with 26 chaetigerous segments, 2 mm in length, including palps and pygidial cirrus, 2 mm in width, including chaetae (Figure 4a–b). Dorsum and sides of parapodia pigmented black. Prostomium bilobed, rounded, slightly hexagonal, black pigmentation at base of ceratophores (Figure 5a). Lateral antenna with terminal insertion; two pairs of eyes, anterior pair dorsolateral, near widest portion of prostomium, posterior pair near base of prostomium, converging towards midline (Figure 5b). Median and lateral antennae, tentacular and dorsal cirri with two dark rings; first more elongated than second, both having subdistal swelling, culminating abruptly in sharp point; ceratophores cylindrical, median antenna larger than lateral antennae. Palps paired, same length as median antenna, culminating almost abruptly into thin point, with 8 longitudinal rows of papillae.

Tentacular segment with two pairs of cylindrical tentaculophores, with three prostomial chaetae on anterodorsal bases. Buccal cirri larger than ventral cirri, with cylindrical cirrophores. Pharynx with 9 pairs of papillae and 2 pairs of maxillae. Facial tubercle present. Dorsal cirri with same coloration as median antenna, larger than ventral cirri, with cylindrical cirrophores.

Parapodia biramous (Figure 5c), prechaetal lobe quadrate or subtriangular, postchaetal lobe short and subtriangular, both with acicula; short notopodia on anterodorsal side of neuropodia. Notochaetae spinous, superior row slender, partially thread-like, with fine, pointed tips (Figure 5d). Neuropodia large, truncate, distally cleft, with prechaetal lobe slightly longer than poschaetal lobe. Neurochaetae stouter than notochaetae, falcate, subdistally slightly thickened, with few rows of spines below slightly bent, blunt, unidentate tips (Figure 5e).

Twelve pairs of elytra covering dorsum entirely, with dark or dark-brown pigmentation; pairs until last chaetiger segment following order: 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21 and 23. First three pairs more ornate, with macro and microtubercles (Figure 5f-h); these tubercles located more posteriorly on elytra after 4th or 5th pair, giving impression of smooth elytra; on 11th and 12th pairs ornamentation similar to that in first pairs. Most of macrotubercles on central region, surrounded by microtubercles (Figure 5i-j). Very long digitiform papillae along external edge, and group of papillae near inferior base of elytra or sometimes next to center (Figure 5k).

Nephridial papillae starting from chaetiger 7, with peduncular aspect. Short ventral cirri with thin tip; one pair of short anal cirri with same coloration as median antenna; anus dorsal in 23rd chaetigerous segment (Figure 4b).

Habitat.

Intertidal zone (algae, rhodoliths) to 5 m, from the coast of Paraíba.

Holotype.

BMNH 1961.16.1

Type locality.

Natal, South Africa.

Distribution.

Suez Canal, Arabian Sea: Karachi; Port Edward, Natal, South Africa, Indian Ocean (Day 1951; Wehe 2006).

New records.

Barra de Camaratuba, Mataraca, Paraíba, Brazil (06°36'14.17"S, 34°57'48.79"W).

(POLY-UFPB 1504), adult from Barra de Camaratuba, Mataraca (06°36'14.17"S, 34°57'48.79"W), Paratypes (POLY-UFPB 1505, 1506), Prainha, Baía da Traição (06°41'23.77"S, 34°55'48.47"W), Paraíba, Brazil.

Remarks.

Lepidonotus natalensis presents a wide distribution. Futher studies are required to enable us to understand if it is a cryptogenic species, because there are no studies to show that it is a species complex, and its origin was not determined.

12. Lepidonotus nesophilus

Chamberlin, 1919

Holotype.

USNM 19400.

Type locality.

Chatham Island, Galapagos Archipelago

Distribution.

Eastern Pacific from Mexico to Galapagos.

13. Lepidonotus panamensis

Hartman, 1939

Holotype.

USNM 47981.

Type locality.

Pacific, Panama.

Distribution.

Eastern Pacific: Panama Bay. Southwestern Atlantic from Bahia and Espírito Santo. Brazil, 27–91 m.

14. Lepidonotus savignyi

Grube, 1856

Type locality.

Callao, Peru.

Distribution.

Eastern Pacific from Peru. Western Atlantic from the West Indies.

15. Lepidonotus sublevis

Verrill, 1873

Holotype.

PMNH 3-5.

Type locality.

New England (Northeastern USA).

Distribution.

Western Atlantic from Massachusetts to Colombia, with one record for Antarctica. Eastern Pacific from Mexico. From 2 to10 m.

Biology.

This species is commensal with the hermit crabs Clibanarius vittatus (Bosc, 1802), Pagurus annulipes (Stimpson, 1860), Pagurus impressus (Benedict, 1892) Pagurus longicarpus Say, 1818, and Pagurus pollicaris Say, 1818. It was found on the lower surface of the sea pansy, Renilla muelleri Kölliker, 1872 (Martin and Britayev 1998).

16. Lepidonotus tenuisetosus

(Gravier, 1902)

Holotype of Euphione tenuisetosa.

MNHN Poly type 263.

Type locality.

Djibouti, Gulf of Tadjoura, Gulf of Aden.

Distribution.

Southwestern Atlantic from Bahia to São Paulo. Eastern Atlantic from Mediterranean to South Africa. Indian Ocean, Madagascar, Persian Gulf, and Red Sea. Western Pacific from Russia to Australia. 0–0.5 m.

Remarks.

Zenetos et al. (2010) and Çinar (2013) assigned Lepidonotus tenuisetosus as an exotic species for the Mediterranean Sea, with an origin in the Indo-Pacific/Red Sea. Its establishment success is uncertain, because it was recorded only once. We consider this species as an exotic species for the Brazilian coast.

17. Lepidonotus tomentosus

(Grube, 1856)

Type locality.

Punta Arenas, Chile.

Distribution.

Eastern Pacific from Costa Rica and Chile. Western Atlantic from French Guyana.

Remarks.

There is material in the USNM from the Galapagos Islands.

18. Lepidonotus variabilis

Webster, 1879

Type locality.

Virginia Coast, North American.

Distribution.

Western Atlantic from Massachusetts to Colombia; 0.2–18 m.

Biology.

Associated with the oyster Cryptostrea permollis (Sowerby, 1871), and with the sponge Stelletta grubii Schmidt, 1862. Food of the winter flounder, Pseudopleuronectes americanus (Walbaum, 1792). Lives among hydroids and sponges.

Discussion

Herein, all information on members of the genus Lepidonotus found around South American coasts in the literature have been gathered, and additional data on two species collected in northeastern Brazil is provided. Eighteen species and subspecies are catalogued from South America, and three of them represent endemic taxa: Lepidonotus brasiliensis and the subspecies Lepidonotus brasiliensis brevis are endemic for Bahia, Brazil, while Lepidonotus margaritaceus is endemic from Ecuador. The subspecies Lepidonotus brasiliensis brevis is very similar to the species Lepidonotus brasiliensis. However, only a detailed review can confirm if the two taxa are synonyms.

The species Lepidonotus caeruleus, Lepidonotus carinulatus, Lepidonotus hupferi, Lepidonotus natalensis, and Lepidonotus tenuisetosus have a broad distribution, and have been reported from several countries. According to Zenetos et al. (2010) and Çinar (2013), the species Lepidonotus carinulatus and Lepidonotus tenuisetosus are exotic species in the Mediterranean and have possibly originated in the Indo-Pacific region/Red Sea. Their introduction area was through the Mediterranean and Sea of Marmara. Despite the broad distributions of Lepidonotus caeruleus, Lepidonotus hupferi and Lepidonotus natalensis, more studies are needed to indicate if they may possibly represent exotic species, their possible areas of introduction, and into which ecological category they belong according to the classification scheme of Çinar (2013). The possible origin of Lepidonotus natalensis is Natal, South Africa, and it was possibly reported from the Suez Canal, Arabian Sea, and Karachi, Pakistan. It is herein reported from the southwest Atlantic, in the state of Paraíba. Lepidonotus caeruleus was first described off Rio de Janeiro, and was reported from the Pacific coast of North America and Japan. Lepidonotus hupferi was first described from the Eastern Atlantic from Senegal and Cape Verde, and later reported for the Pacific from New Caledonia, Australia, Mexico, and Ecuador. The remaining species present narrow distributions spanning few countries.

For some records essential features are not presented clearly, such as the ornamentation of the elytra, or the shape of the prostomium and chaetae. Some characters, such as form of nuchal folds, pigmentation of the antennae, and dorsal cirri, are not mentioned for the species Lepidonotus brasiliensis and Lepidonotus panamensis. We are left with the view that species are very similar and difficult to distinguish. Therefore, revisionary studies of Lepidonotus are needed to establish whether cryptic species occur.

Supplementary Material

XML Treatment for Lepidonotus
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus arenosus
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus brasiliensis
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus brasiliensis laevis
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus caeruleus
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus carinulatus
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus crosslandi
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus crosslandi peruana
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus furcillatus
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus hupferi
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus margaritaceus
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus natalensis
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus nesophilus
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus panamensis
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus savignyi
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus sublevis
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus tenuisetosus
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus tomentosus
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus variabilis

Acknowledgments

We heartily thank Dr Mathan Magesh (Project Associate Conservation of Coastal and the Marine Resources Division National Centre for Sustainable Coastal Management, Chennai, India) for the corrections of the English grammar, and for contributions to the manuscript. To all members of the Laboratory of Invertebrates Paulo Young (LIPY) for their work in assembling the collection of marine invertebrates, and in particular to Dr. Carmen Alonso Samiguel for her dedication in the preservation of this collection. We thank Dr Christopher Glasby (MAGNT), and the anonymous referees for suggestions to improve this paper. We acknowledge CNPq and FACEPE for pos-doctoral scholarship to J.E. De Assis and the productivity grant to M.L. Christoffersen.

Citation

De Assis JE, Brito RJ, Christoffersen ML, Souza JRB (2015) A catalogue of the scaleworm genus Lepidonotus (Polynoidae, Polychaeta) from South America, with two new records for Brazilian waters. ZooKeys 533: 63–98. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.533.6184

References

  1. Achari GPK. (1969) Catalogue of polychaetes in the reference collections of the Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute. Bulletin of the Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute 7: 31–40. [Google Scholar]
  2. Amaral ACZ, Nonato EF. (1982) Anelídeos poliquetos da costa brasileira: Aphroditidae e Polynoidae, volume 3 Coordenação Editorial, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Brasília, 46 pp. [Google Scholar]
  3. Amaral ACZ, Nallin SAH. (2011) Biodiversidades e ecossistemas bentônicos marinhos do litoral norte de São Paulo. Sudeste do Brasil. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, 573 pp. [Google Scholar]
  4. Amaral ACZ, Nallin SAH, Steiner TM, Forroni TO, Gomes DF. (2013) Catálogo das espécies de AnnelidaPolychaeta do Brasil. http://www.ib.unicamp.br/museu_zoologia/files/lab_museu_zoologia/Catalogo_Polychaeta_Amaral_et_al_2012.pdf [accessed in 06/17/2015]
  5. Amoureux L, Rullier F, Fishelson L. (1978) Systématique et écologie d’annélides polychètes de la Presqu’il du Sinai. Israel Journal of Zoology 27: 57–163. [Google Scholar]
  6. Andrews EA. (1891) Report upon the Annelida Polychaeta of Beaufort, North Carolina. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 14(852): 277–302. doi: 10.5479/si.00963801.14-852.277 [Google Scholar]
  7. Ansari ZA, Ingole BS, Parulekar AH. (1986) Effect of high organic enrichment of benthic polychaete population in an estuary. Marine Pollution Bulletin 17: 361–365. doi: 10.1016/0025-326X(86)90249-3 [Google Scholar]
  8. Augener H. (1913) Polychaeta I. Errantia. In: Michaelsen W, Hartmeyer R. (Eds) Die Fauna Südwest-Australiens. Ergebnisse der Hamburger südwest-australischen Forschungsreise, 1905. vol. 4, Lieferung 5 Gustav Fisher, Jena, 63–30. [Google Scholar]
  9. Augener H. (1918) Polychaeta. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Meeresfauna Westafrikas 2: 67–625. [Google Scholar]
  10. Augener H. (1922) Revision der australischen Polychaeten-Typen von Kinberg. Arkiv för Zoologi 14(8): 1–42. [Google Scholar]
  11. Augener H. (1925) Úber westingdische und einige andere Polychaeten-type von Grube (Oersted), Krøyer, Mörch und Schmarda. Universitetets Zoologische Museum Kobenhavn 39: 1–47. [Google Scholar]
  12. Aziz ND. (1938) Fauna of Karachi, 2. Polychaetes. Memoirs of the Department of Zoology Punjab University Lahore 1: 19–52. [Google Scholar]
  13. Baéz DP, Ardilla NE. (2003) Poliquetos (Annelida: Polychaeta) del Mar de Caribe colombiano. Biota Colombiana 4: 89–109. [Google Scholar]
  14. Baird W. (1865) Contributions toward a monograph of the species of annelides belonging to the Aphroditacea, containing a list of the known species, and a description of some new species contained in the national collection of the British Museum. Journal of the Linnean Society of London 8: 172–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1865.tb02438.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Barnich R, Fiege D. (2003) The Aphroditoidea (Annelida, Polychaeta) of the Mediterranean Sea. Abh. Abhandlungen der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 559: 1–167. [Google Scholar]
  16. Barnich R, Fiege D, Sun RP. (2004) Polychaeta (Annelida) of Hainan Island, South China Sea. Part III. Aphroditoidea. Species Diversity 9: 285–329. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bastida-Zavala JR. (1993) Taxonomìa y composición biogeográfica de los poliquetos (Annelida: Polychaeta) de la Bahìa de la Paz, B. C. S., México. Revista de Investigación Cientítica 4: 11–39. [Google Scholar]
  18. Bastida-Zavala JR. (1995) Poliquetos (Annelida: Polychaeta) del arrecife coralino de Cabo Pulmo - Los Frailes, BCS. México. Revista de Zoologia 6: 9–29. [Google Scholar]
  19. Behre EH. (1950) Annotated list of fauna of the Grand Isle region. Occasional Papers of the Marine Laboratory Louisiana State University 6: 1–66. [Google Scholar]
  20. Bellan G. (2001) Polychaeta. In: Costello MJ, Emblow C, White RJ. (Eds) European register of marine species: a checklist of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. Collection Patrimoines Naturels, 50 Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, 214–231. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ben-Eliahu MN. (1972) Polychaeta Errantia of the Suez Canal. Contributions to the knowledge of Suez Canal migration. Israel Journal of Zoology 21: 189–237. [Google Scholar]
  22. Berkeley E. (1923) Polychaetous annelids from the Nanaimo District. 1. Syllidae to Sigalionidae. Contributions to Canadian Biology New Series 1: 203–218. doi: 10.1139/f22-011 [Google Scholar]
  23. Berkeley E, Berkeley C. (1941) On a collection of Polychaeta from Southern California. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences 40(1): 16–60. [Google Scholar]
  24. Berkeley E, Berkeley C. (1942) North Pacific Polychaeta, chiefly from the west coast of Vancouver Island, Alaska, and Bering Sea. Canadian Journal of Research 20(7): 182–208. doi: 10.1139/cjr42d-016 [Google Scholar]
  25. Berkeley E, Berkeley C. (1948) Annelida, Polychaeta, Errantia. Canadian Pacific Fauna. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Toronto: 9b(1): 1–100. [Google Scholar]
  26. Berlandi RM, Figueiredo MAD, Paiva PC. (2012) Rhodolith morphology and the diversity of polychaetes off the southeastern Brazilian coast. Journal of Coastal Research 28: 280–287. doi: 10.2112/11T-00002.1 [Google Scholar]
  27. Blake JA. (1991) The polychaete fauna of the Galapagos Islands. Topics in Geobiology 8: 75–96. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-0646-5_4 [Google Scholar]
  28. Boesch DF. (1973) Classification and community structure of macrobenthos in the Hampton Roads Area, Virginia. Marine Biology 21: 226–244. doi: 10.1007/BF00355253 [Google Scholar]
  29. Buzhinskaya GN, Obut AM, Potin VV. (1980) Errant polychaets (sic) from coral reefs and island of the Indian and Pacific oceans. In: Preobrazhenski BV, Krasov EV. (Eds) Biology of coral reefs. Morphology, systematics, ecology. Akademia Nauka SSSR, Moscow, 225–256. [Google Scholar]
  30. Calder DR, Brehmer ML. (1967) Seasonal occurrence of epifauna on test panels in Hampton Reads. Virginia Institute. Journal of Oceanology and Limnology 1: 149–164. [Google Scholar]
  31. Cantone G. (1987) Richerche sul litorale della Somalia. Popolamento polichetologico della coste Somale. Italian Journal of Zoology 7: 73–85. [Google Scholar]
  32. Chamberlin RV. (1918) Polychaetes from Monterey Bay. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 31: 173–180. [Google Scholar]
  33. Chamberlin RV. (1919) The Annelida Polychaeta. Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoölogy at Harvard College 48: 1–514. [Google Scholar]
  34. Chambers SJ, Muir AL. (1997) Polychaetes: British Chrysopetaloidea, Pisionoidea and Aphroditoidea. Synopsis of the British Fauna 54: 1–202. [Google Scholar]
  35. Che RGO, Qiu JW, Wu BL. (1999) Distribution of Polychaeta in the southern waters of Hong Kong. Asian Marine Biology 15: 135–158. [Google Scholar]
  36. Çinar ME. (2009) Alien polychaete species (Annelida: Polychaeta) on the southern coast of Turkey (Levantine Sea, Eastern Mediterranean), with 13 new records for the Mediterranean Sea. Journal of Natural History 43: 2283–2328. doi: 10.1080/00222930903094654 [Google Scholar]
  37. Çinar ME. (2013) Alien polychaete species worldwide: current status and their impacts. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 93: 1257–1278. doi: 10.1017/S0025315412001646 [Google Scholar]
  38. Conner WG, Hinegardner R, Bachmann K. (1972) Nuclear DNA amounts in polychaete annelids. Experimentia 28: 1502–1504. doi: 10.1007/BF01957880 [Google Scholar]
  39. Cruz M, Gonzalez M, Gualancañay E, Villamar F. (1980) Lista de la fauna sublitoral bentonica del Estero Salado Inferior, Ecuador. Acta Oceanográfica del Pacìfico 1: 82–96. [Google Scholar]
  40. Cunha RJ, Güth AZ, Bromberg G, Sumida PYG. (2013) Macrofauna associated with the brown algae Dictyota spp (Phaeophyceae, Dictyotaceae) in the Sebastião Gomes Reef and Abrolhos Archipelago, Bahia, Brazil. Continental Shelf Research 70: 140–149. doi: 10.1016/j.csr.2013.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  41. Dauer DM. (1973) Polychaete fauna associated with Gulf of Mexico sponges. Florida Scientist 36: 192–196. [Google Scholar]
  42. Dauer DM. (1991) Functional morphology and feeding behavior of Polydora commensalis (Polychaeta: Spionidae). Ophelia Supplement 5: 607–614. [Google Scholar]
  43. Day JH. (1934) On a collection of South African Polychaeta, with a catalogue of the species recorded from South Africa, Angola, Mozambique, and Madagascar. Journal of the Linnean Society of London 39(263): 15–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1934.tb00259.x [Google Scholar]
  44. Day JH. (1951) The polychaete fauna of South Africa. Part I. The intertidal and estuarine Polychaeta of Natal and Mosambique. Annals of the Natal Museum 12(1): 1–67. [Google Scholar]
  45. Day JH. (1953) The polychaete fauna of South Africa. Part 2. Errant species from Cape shores and estuaries. Annals of the Natal Museum 12: 397–441. [Google Scholar]
  46. Day JH. (1962) Polychaeta from several localities in the western Indian Ocean. Proccedings of the Zoological Society of London 139: 627–656. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1962.tb01597.x [Google Scholar]
  47. Day JH. (1967) The polychaete fauna of South Africa. Part 1: Errantia. British Museum (Natural History), London, 458 pp. [Google Scholar]
  48. Day JH. (1973) New Polychaeta from Beaufort, with a key to all species recorded from North Carolina. National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration Technical Report Natural Marine Fisheries Service Circulars 375: 1–140. doi: 10.5962/bhl.title.62852 [Google Scholar]
  49. Day JH. (1974) The ecology of Morrumbene estuary, Moçambique. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 41: 43–96. doi: 10.1080/00359197409519438 [Google Scholar]
  50. Day JH. (1975) On a collection of Polychaeta from intertidal and shallow reefs near Perth, Western Australia. Records of the Western Australian Museum 3(3): 167–208. [Google Scholar]
  51. Day JH, Morgans JFC. (1956) The ecology of South African estuaries. Part 7. The biology of Durban Bay. Annals of the Natal Museum 13: 259–312. [Google Scholar]
  52. Dean HK. (2004) Marine biodiversity of Costa Rica: Class Polychaeta (Annelida). Revista de Biologia Tropical Supplement 2(52): 131–181. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. De Assis JE, Alonso C, Brito RJ, Santos AS, Christoffersen ML. (2012) Polychaetous annelids from the coast of Paraìba State, Brazil. Revista Nordestina de Biologia 21(1): 3–44. [Google Scholar]
  54. Dìaz-Castaneda V, Rodriguez-Villanueva V. (1998) Polychaete fauna from San Quintin Bay, Baja California, Mexico. Bulletin Southern California Academy of Sciences 97: 9–32. [Google Scholar]
  55. Dorner H. (1877) Guide to the New York Aquarium. Atheneum, New York, 90 pp. [Google Scholar]
  56. Drowne FP. (1896) Spile scraping and some of the marine invertebrates obtained by it. Oregon Naturalist 3: 73–74. doi: 10.1006/ecss.1996.0011 [Google Scholar]
  57. Duarte LFL, Nalesso RC. (1996) The sponge Zygomycale parishii (Bowerbank) and its endobiotic fauna. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 42: 139–151. [Google Scholar]
  58. Dueñas PR. (1981) Lista preliminar de los poliquetos. In: Werding B, Garzón J, Zea S. (Eds) Informe sobre los resultados de la expedicion a las Islas de Providencia y Santa Catalina. Project Final Report, Santa Marta, 42–47. [Google Scholar]
  59. Dueñas PR. (1999) Listado de poliquetos colectados durante los años 1979-1999 en la bahìa de Cartagena y Golfo de Morrosquillo. Revista Milenio 1: 9–18. [Google Scholar]
  60. Ebbs NK. (1966) The coral-inhabiting polychaetes of the northern Florida reef tract. Part 1. Aphroditidae, Polynoidae, Amphinomidae, Eunicidae, and Lysaretidae. Bulletin of Marine Science 16: 485–555. [Google Scholar]
  61. Ehlers E. (1901a) Die Polychaeten des magellanischen und chilenischen Strandes.Ein faunistischer Versuch.Festschrift zur Feier des Hundertfünfzigjährigen Bestehens des Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. Abhandlungen der Mathematisch Physikalischen Klasse 1901: 1–232. [Google Scholar]
  62. Ehlers E. (1901b) Die Anneliden der Sammlung Plate.Fauna Chilensis; Abhandlungen zur kenntniss der Zoologie Chiles nach den Sammlungen von Dr. L. Plate. Zweiter Band. Zoologische Jahrbuch Supplement 5: 251–272. [Google Scholar]
  63. Essenberg C. (1918) The factors controlling the distribution of the Polynoidae of the Pacific coast of North America. University of California Publications in Zoology 118: 171–238. [Google Scholar]
  64. Fauchald K. (1977) Polychaetes from intertidal areas in Panama with a review of previous shallow-water records. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 221: 1–81. doi: 10.5479/si.00810282.221 [Google Scholar]
  65. Fauchald K, Granadas-Barba A, Solìs-Weiss V. (2009) Polychaeta (Annelida) of the Gulf of Mexico. In: Felder DL, Camp SK. (Eds) Gulf of Mexico origins, waters, and biota. Biodiversity. Texas A and M Press, College Station, Texas, 751–788. [Google Scholar]
  66. Fauchald K, Reimer AA. (1975) Clave de poliquetos panameños con la inclusion de una clave para todas las familias del mundo. Boletin del Instituto Oceanografico Universidad de Oriente Cumana 14: 71–94. [Google Scholar]
  67. Fauvel P. (1911) Annélides polychètes du Golfe Persique recueillis par M. M. Bogoyawlewsky. Archives de Zoologie Expérimentale et Génerale 5(6): 353–439. [Google Scholar]
  68. Fauvel P. (1918) Annélides polychètes des côtes d’Arabie récoltées par M. Ch. Pérez. Bulletin du Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle 24(5): 329–344. [Google Scholar]
  69. Fauvel P. (1919a) Annélides polychètes de Madagascar, de Djibouti et du Golfe Persique. Archives de Zoologie Expérimentale et Génerale 58(347): 315–473. [Google Scholar]
  70. Fauvel P. (1919b) Annélides polychètes de la Guyane Française. Bulletin du Museum d’Histoire Naturelle de Paris 25: 472–479. [Google Scholar]
  71. Fauvel P. (1927) Rapport sur les annélides polychètes errantes. Zoological results of the Cambridge Expedition to the Suez Canal, 1924. Transactions of the Zoological Society of London 22: 411–439. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1927.tb00203.x [Google Scholar]
  72. Fauvel P. (1933) Annélides polychètes du Golfe du Pei Tcheu Ly de la collection du Musée Hoangho Pai-ho.Récoltées par le R. P. Leroy, S. J. et le R. P. Licent S. J. Publications du Musée Hoangho Paiho de TienTsin 15: 1–67. [Google Scholar]
  73. Fauvel P. (1950) Contribution à la faune des annélides polychaetes du Senegal. Bulletin de l‘ Institut Française d’Afrique Noire 12(2): 335–394. [Google Scholar]
  74. Fauvel P. (1953) Annelida Polychaeta. In: Seymour-Sewell RB. (Ed.) The fauna of British India including Pakistan, Ceylon, Burma and Malaya. Indian, Allahabad, 480–507. [Google Scholar]
  75. Fauvel P. (1955) Résultats scientifiques des campagnes de la “Calypso”. I. Campagne en Mer Rouge (1951–1952). Annales de l’Institute Océanographique Paris 30: 100–120. [Google Scholar]
  76. Fauvel P, Rullier F. (1957) Nouvelle contribution à la faune des annélides polychètes du Sénégal. Bulletin de l‘ Institut Française d’Afrique Noire, tôme 14, série A, 1: 24–96. [Google Scholar]
  77. Fauvel P, Rullier F. (1959a) Annélides polychètes. Résultats scientifiques des campagnes de la “Calypso” 4, 10. Campagne 1956 dans le Golfe de Guinée et aux îles Principe, São Tomé et Annobon. Annales de l‘Institut Océanographique de Monaco Nouvelle Series 37: 143–205. [Google Scholar]
  78. Fauvel P, Rullier F. (1959b) Contribution à la faune des annélides polychètes du Sénégal et de Mauretanie. Première Partie. Bulletin de l‘ Institut Française d’Afrique Noire 21: 477–533. [Google Scholar]
  79. Ferguson FF, Jones ER Jr. (1949) A survey of the shore-line fauna of the Norfolk Peninsula. American Midland Naturalist 41: 436–446. [Google Scholar]
  80. Forbes ML. (1966) Life cycle of Ostrea permollis and its relationship to the host sponge, Stelletta grubii. Bulletin of Marine Science 16: 273–301. [Google Scholar]
  81. Fotheringham N. (1976) Population consequences of shell size utilization by hermit crabs. Ecology 57: 570–578. doi: 10.2307/1936441 [Google Scholar]
  82. Galil BS. (2006) The marine caravan–The Suez Canal and the Erythrean invasion. Monographiae Biologicae, 83: 207–300. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5047-3_6 [Google Scholar]
  83. Galil BS. (2007) Seeing red: Alien species along the Mediterranean coast of Israel. Aquatic Invasions 2: 281–312. doi: 10.3391/ai.2007.2.4.2 [Google Scholar]
  84. Gambi MC, Castellia, Guizzardi M. (1997) Polychaete populations of the shallow soft bottoms off Terra Nova Bay (Ross Sea, Antarctica): distribution, diversity and biomass. Polar Biology 17: 199–210. doi: 10.1007/s003000050123 [Google Scholar]
  85. Gardiner SL. (1976) Errant polychaete annelids from North Carolina. Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 91: 77–220. [Google Scholar]
  86. Gil JJ, Lee JH, Tae NY. (1987) Taxonomic study of polynoid polychaetes in Korea II. Subfamily Lepidonotinae. Korea Fisheries Association 20: 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  87. Gobin JF. (2010) Free-living marine polychaetes (Annelida) inhabiting hard-bottom substrates in Trinidad and Tobago, West Indies. Revista de Biologia Tropical 58: 147–157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Golombek A, Tobergte S, Nesidal MP, Purschke G, Struck TH. (2013) Mitochondrial genomes to the rescue–Diurodrilidae in the myzostomid trap. Molecular Phylogenetic and Evolution 68: 312–326. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2013.03.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Gravier C. (1902) Contribution à l’ étude des annélides polychètes de la Mer Rouge. Nouvelles Archives du Museum d’ Histoire Naturelle de Paris Series 4 3: 147–268. [Google Scholar]
  90. Grube AE. (1856) Annulata Örstediana. Enumeratio Annulatorum, quae in itinere per Indian occidentalem et Americam centralen annis 1845–1848 suscepto legit cl. A. S. Örsted, adjectis speciebus nonnullis a cl. Kröyero in itinere ad Americam meridionalem collectis. Videnskabelige Meddedelser fra Dansk Naturhististorisk Foreningen i Köbenhavn 1: 44–62. [Google Scholar]
  91. Grube AE. (1876) Bemerkungen über die Familie der Aphroditeen (Gruppe Polynoina, Acoëtea, Polylepidea). Jahresbericht der Schlesische Gesellschaft für Vaterlandische Kultur Breslau 53: 46–72. [Google Scholar]
  92. Grube AE. (1878) Annulata Semperiana. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Anneliden-fauna der Philippinen nach den von Hernn Prof. Semper mitgebrachten Sammlungen. Mémoires de l‘ Academie Imperialede Saint Petersburg Series 7 25: 1–300. [Google Scholar]
  93. Grube E. (1869) Beschreibungen neuer oder weniger bekannter von Hrn. Ehrenberg gesammelter Anneliden des rothen Meeres. Monatsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin aus dem Jahre 1869: 484–521. [imprinted year 1870, but published in 1869 acc. to The Zoological Record 1870 (vol. 6) for the year 1869] [Google Scholar]
  94. Hanley JR. (1992) Checklist of scaleworms (Polychaeta: Polynoidae) from Hong Kong. In: Morton B. (Ed.) The marine flora and fauna of Hong Kong and southern China III. Volume 1 Proceedings of the Fourth International Marine Biological Workshop: The marine flora and fauna of Hong Kong and southern China, Hong Kong, 11–29 April 1989 Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong, 361–369. [Google Scholar]
  95. Hanley JR, Burke M. (1991) Polychaeta Polynoidae: Scaleworms of the Chesterfield Island and Fairways Reefs, Coral Sea. Mémoires du Muséum National d‘Histoire Naturelle Series A 151: 9–82. [Google Scholar]
  96. Hartman O. (1939) Polychaetous annelids, Part 1. Aphroditidae to Pisionidae. Reports of the Allan Hancock Pacific Expedition 7: 1–156. [Google Scholar]
  97. Hartman O. (1942) A review of the types of polychaetous annelids at the Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University. Bulletin of the Bingham Oceanographic Collection 8(1): 1–98. [Google Scholar]
  98. Hartman O. (1944) Polychaetous annelids from California including the description of two new genera and nine new species. Allan Hancock Pacific Expedition 10(2): 239–310. [Google Scholar]
  99. Hartman O. (1945) The marine annelids of North Carolina. Bulletin of the Duke University Marine Station 2: 1–54. [Google Scholar]
  100. Hartman O. (1948) The polychaetous annelids of Alaska. Pacific Science 2(1): 3–58. [Google Scholar]
  101. Hartman O. (1951) The littoral marine annelids of the Gulf of Mexico. Publications of the Institute of Marine Science Port Aransas Texas 2: 7–124. [Google Scholar]
  102. Hartman O. (1954) Polychaetous annelids of the Gulf of Mexico. In: GALFSOFT PS. (Ed.) Gulf of Mexico, its origin, waters and marine life. Fishery Bulletin Fish and Wildlife Service United States Department of Interior 55: 413–417.
  103. Hartman O. (1959) Catalogue of the polychaetous annelids of the world.Parts 1 and 2. Occasional Papers of the Allan Hancock Foundation 23: 1–628. [Google Scholar]
  104. Hartman O. (1965) Deep-water benthic polychaetous annelids off New England to Bermuda and other North Atlantic areas. Occasional Papers of the Allan Hancock Foundation 28: 1–378. [Google Scholar]
  105. Hartman O. (1974) Polychaetous annelids of the Indian Ocean including an account of species collected by members of the International Indian Ocean Expeditions, 1963-’64 and a catalogue and bibliography of the species from India. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India 16(1): 191–252. [Google Scholar]
  106. Hartman O, Reish DJ. (1950) The marine annelids of Oregon. Monographs Series of the Oregon State College Studies in Zoology 6: 1–64. [Google Scholar]
  107. Hartmann-Schröder G. (1962) Zur Beitrag zur polychaeten Fauna von Peru. Kieler Meeresforschungen 18: 109–147. [Google Scholar]
  108. Hartmann-Schröder G, Hartmann G. (1991) Zur Kenntnis des Eulitorals der australischen Küsten unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Polychaeten und Ostracoden. Teil 16. Die Polychaeten der subtropisch-tropischen bis tropischen Ostküste Australiens zwischen Maclean (New South Wales) und Gladstone (Queensland) sowie von Heron Island (Großes Barriere Riff). Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institut 88: 17–71. [Google Scholar]
  109. Hartwich G. (1993) Die Polychaeten-Typen des Zoologischen Museums in Berlin. The types of Polychaeta in the Zoological Museum, Berlin. Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin 69(1): 73–154. doi: 10.1002/mmnz.19930690106 [Google Scholar]
  110. Hedgpeth JW. (1950) Annotated list of certain marine invertebrates found on Texas jetties. In: Whitten HL, Rosene HF, Hedgpeth JW. (Eds) The invertebrate fauna of Texas coast jetties, a preliminary survey. Publication of the Institute of Marine Sciences University of Texas 1: 72–86.
  111. Heilprin A. (1888) The animal life of our sea-shore. With special reference to the New Jersey coast and southern shore of Long Island. Lippincott, Philadelphia, 130 pp. doi: 10.5962/bhl.title.11680 [Google Scholar]
  112. Hernández-Alcántara P, Frontana-Uribe SC, Solìs-Weiss V. (2003) Commented checklist of the polychaetes (Annelida: Polychaeta) from areas adjacent to Islands of the Mexican Pacific and Gulf of California. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences 102: 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  113. Hoagland RA. (1919) Polychaetous annelids from Porto Rico, the Florida Keys, and Bermuda. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 41: 571–591. [Google Scholar]
  114. Hong PN, San HT. (1993) Mangroves of Vietnam. Volume 7. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Bangkok, Thailand, 173 pp. [Google Scholar]
  115. Ibarzábal DR. (1986) Lista de especies de poliquetos bentónicos cubanos. Reporte de Investigacíon del Instituto de Oceanología, Academia de Ciencias de Cuba 45: 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  116. Imajima M. (1997) Polychaetous annelids from Sagami Bay and Sagami Sea collected by the emperor Showa of Japan and deposited at the Showa Memorial Institute, National Science Museum, Tokyo. Families Polynoidae and Acoetidae. National Science Museum Monographs 13: 1–131. [Google Scholar]
  117. Imajima M, Hartman O. (1964) The polychaetous annelids of Japan, Part I. Occasional Papers of the Allan Hancock Foundation 26: 1–237. [Google Scholar]
  118. Intès A, Le Loeuff P. (1975) Les annélides polychètes de Côte d’ Ivoire. I. Polychètes errantes–compte rendu systématique. Cahiers de l’Office de Recherches Scientifiques et Techniques de Outre Mer Serie Oceanographie 13: 267–321. [Google Scholar]
  119. Ismail NS. (1985) The effects of hydraulic dredging to control oyster drills on benthic macrofauna of oyster grounds in Delaware Bay, New Jersey. Internationale Revue der Gesamte Hydrobiologie 70: 379–395. doi: 10.1002/iroh.19850700308 [Google Scholar]
  120. Izuka A. (1912) The errantiate Polychaeta of Japan. Journal of the College of Science, Imperial University of Tokyo 30(2): 1–262. [Google Scholar]
  121. Kalk M. (1958) The fauna of the intertidal rocks at Ithaca Island, Delagoa Bay. Annals of the Natal Museum 14: 189–242. [Google Scholar]
  122. Kato T, Sato M, Tai A. (2006) Polychaetes of the intertidal zone of Yamaguchi Prefecture, Kaminoseki Town, Nagashima (follow-up). Reports of the Chugoku-Shikoku Branch of the Ecological Society of Japan 60: 28–32. [Google Scholar]
  123. Katsanevakis S, Bogucarskis K, Gatto F, Vandekerkhove J, Deriu I, Cardoso AS. (2012) Building the European Alien Species Information Network (EASIN): a novel approach for the exploration of distributed alien species data. BioInvasions Records 1: 235–245. doi: 10.3391/bir.2012.1.4.01 [Google Scholar]
  124. Kazmi QB, Naushaba R. (2013) Checklist of marine worms reported from Pakistani marine waters. Pakistan Journal of Nematology 31: 187–280. [Google Scholar]
  125. Khan SA, Murugesan P. (2005) Polychaete diversity in Indian estuaries. Indian Journal of Marine Science 34: 114–119. [Google Scholar]
  126. Kinner P, Maurer D. (1978) Polychaetous annelids of the Delaware Bay region. Bulletin Fish and Wildlife Service United States Department of Interior 76: 209–224. [Google Scholar]
  127. Kinberg JGH. (1856) Nya slägten och arter af Annelider. Öfversigt af Kongliga VetenskapsAkademiens Förhandlingar Stockholm 12(9–10): 381–388. [Google Scholar]
  128. Kinberg JGH. (1858) Annulater, Part 3. Annulater. Kongliga svenska fregatten Eugenies resa omkring jorden under befäl af C.A. Virgin aren 1851–1853. Ventenskapliga Iakttagelser pa Konung Oscar den Förstes Befallning Utgifna af Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademien. Zoologi 2: 9–32. [Google Scholar]
  129. Kirkegaard JB. (1983) The Polychaeta of West Africa: Part II. Errant species: 1. Aphroditidae to Nereididae. Atlantide Reports 13: 181–240. [Google Scholar]
  130. Kölliker A. (1872) Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Polypen, 1. Über die Gattung Solanderia Duch. et Michelin. Verhandlungen des Physisch-Medizins Gesellschaft im Würzburg 2: 11–30. [Google Scholar]
  131. Kumar RS. (2000) A checklist of soil-dwelling polychaetous annelids from some Indian mangrove habitats. Zoo’s Print Journal 10: 439–441. [Google Scholar]
  132. Laverde-Castillo JJA. (1986) Lista anotada de los poliquetos (Annelida) registrados para el Pacifico Colombiano, con notas preliminares sobre su zoogeografia. Acualidades Biológicas 15(58): 123–130. [Google Scholar]
  133. Leach WE. (1816) Vermes Polychaeta. Encyclopedia Britannica, Supplement 6: 451–452. [Google Scholar]
  134. Linnaeus C. (1758) Systema Naturae per Regna tria Naturae, secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, cum characteribus, differentiatiis, synonymis, locis. Tomus 1 Editio reformata Laurentii Salvii, Holmiae, 824 pp. [Google Scholar]
  135. Li HX, Yan Y, He WH, Zou XL. (2010) An ecological study on fouling in the waters off the Bailong Peninsula in the Beibu Gulf. Journal of Tropical Oceanography 29: 108–113. [In Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  136. Li Y, Ping SR. (2008) Huanghai annelid diversity preliminary study. Marine Science 32: 40–51. [In Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  137. Macnae W, Kalk M. (1958) A natural history of Inhaca Island, Mozambique. First Edition Witwatersrand University Press, Cape Town, 113 pp. [Google Scholar]
  138. MacPhee GK. (1978) Synopsis of biological data for the winter flounder, Pseudopleuronectes americanus (Walbaum). National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration Technical Report National Marine Fisheries Service Circulars 414: 1–43. [Google Scholar]
  139. Martin D, Britayev TA. (1998) Symbiotic polychaetes: review of known species. Annual Review of Oceanography and Marine Biology 36: 217–340. [Google Scholar]
  140. McDermott JJ. (2001) Symbionts of the hermit crab Pagurus longicarpus Say, 1817 (Decapoda: Anomura): New observations from New Jersey waters and a review of all known relationships. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 114: 624–639. [Google Scholar]
  141. Misra A. (1995) Hugli Matla estuary: West Bengal. Zoologial Survey of India, Calcutta, 93 pp. [Google Scholar]
  142. Misra A, Chakraborty RK. (2000) Annelida: Polychaeta. Fauna of Gujarat: Invertebrates, Volume 2. Zoologial Survey of India, Calcutta, 219 pp. [Google Scholar]
  143. Mohammad MBM. (1971) Intertidal polychaetes from Kuwait Arabian Gulf, with descriptions of three new species. Journal of Zoology London 163: 285–303. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1971.tb04536.x [Google Scholar]
  144. Monro CCA. (1928) Polychaeta of the families Polynoidae and Acoetidae from the vicinity of the Panama Canal, collected by Dr. C. Crossland and Th. Mortensen. Journal of the Linnean Society of London 36: 553–576. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1928.tb02209.x [Google Scholar]
  145. Monro CCA. (1934) On a collection of Polychaeta from the coast of China. Annals and Magazine of Natural History Series 1013: 353–380. doi: 10.1080/00222933408654824 [Google Scholar]
  146. Montagu G. (1808) Description of several marine animals found on the south coast of Devonshire. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 9: 81–114. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1818.tb00327.x [Google Scholar]
  147. Moore JP. (1903) Polychaeta from the coastal slope of Japan and from Kamchatka and Bering Sea. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 55: 401–490. [Google Scholar]
  148. Moore JP. (1906) Additional new species of Polychaeta from the north Pacific. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 58: 217–260. [Google Scholar]
  149. Moore JP. (1908) Some Polychaetous Annelids of northern Pacific coast of America. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 60(2): 321–364. [Google Scholar]
  150. Moore JP. (1910) The Polychaetous annelids dredged by the U.U.S. “Albatross” off the coast of southern California in 1904, II. Polynoidae, Aphroditidae and Sigalionidae. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 62: 328–402. [Google Scholar]
  151. Morgado EH, Amaral ACZ. (1981) Anelídeos poliquetos associados a um briozoário 3. Polynoidae. Boletim do Instituto Oceanográfico de São Paulo 30: 91–96. doi: 10.1590/S0373-55241981000100012 [Google Scholar]
  152. Morgado EH, Tanaka MO. (2001) The macrofauna associated with the bryozoan Schizoporella errata (Waters) in southeastern Brazil. Scientia Marina 65: 173–181. [Google Scholar]
  153. Mustaquim J. (1997) Marine worms (Polychaeta) of Pakistan. In: Mufti SA, Wood CA, Hasan SA. (Eds) Biodiversity of Pakistan. Florida Museum of Natural History, Gainesville, 221–227. [Google Scholar]
  154. Naeni AB, Rahimian HH. (2009) Intertidal scale worms (Polychaeta, Polynoidae and Sigalionidae) from the northern coasts of the Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman. Zookeys Special Issue 31: 53–71. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.31.127 [Google Scholar]
  155. Nonato EF, Luna JAC. (1970a) Sobre alguns poliquetas de escama do Nordeste do Brasil. Boletim do Instituto Oceanográfico de São Paulo 18: 63–91. doi: 10.1590/S0373-55241969000100008 [Google Scholar]
  156. Nonato EF, Luna JAC. (1970b) Anelìdeos poliquetos do nordeste do Brasil. I. Poliquetos bentônicos da costa de Alagoas e Sergipe. Boletim do Instituto Oceanográfico de São Paulo 19: 57–130. [Google Scholar]
  157. Okuda S. (1940) Polychaetous annelids of the Ryukyu Islands. Bulletin of the Biogeographical Society of Japan 10: 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  158. Paiva PC. (2006) Filo Annelida, Classe Polychaeta. In: Lavrado HP, Ignácio BL. (Eds) Biodiversidade bentônica da reigião central da zona econômica exclusiva Brasileira. Série Livros, 18. Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro, 261–298.
  159. Palpal-Latoc VS. (1990) New records of polychaetous annelids from Llocos Sur. National Museum Papers 1: 45–69. [Google Scholar]
  160. Palpal-Latoc VS. (1994) Some scale-bearing polychaetes of Llocos Sur. National Museum Papers 4: 67–77. [Google Scholar]
  161. Pearse AS, Williams LG. (1951) The biota of the reefs off the Carolinas. Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 67: 133–161. [Google Scholar]
  162. Pequegnat WE. (1964) The epifauna of a California siltstone reef. Ecology 45: 272–283. doi: 10.2307/1933840 [Google Scholar]
  163. Perkins TH. (1998) Checklist of shallow-water marine polychaetous Annelida of Florida. In: Camp DK, Lyons WG, Perkins TH. (Eds) Checklists of selected shallow-water marine invertebrates of Florida. Technical Reports, 3 Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Florida Marine Research Institute, Saint Petersburg, 79–122. [Google Scholar]
  164. Perkins TH, Savage T. (1975) A bibliography of polychaetous annelids of Florida, the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean region. Florida Marine Research Publications 14: 1–62. [Google Scholar]
  165. Pettibone MH. (1953) Some scalebearing polychaetes of Puget Sound and adjacent waters. University of Washington, Seattle, 89 pp. [Google Scholar]
  166. Pettibone MH. (1963) Marine Polychaete worms of the New England Region, part 1. Aphroditidae through Trochochaetidae. Bulletin of the United States National Museum 227: 1–336. doi: 10.5479/si.03629236.227.1 [Google Scholar]
  167. Peyrot-Clausade M. (1974) Ecological study of coral reef cryptobiotic communities: an analysis of the polychaete cryptofauna. In: Cameron AM, Campbell BM, Cribb AB, Endean R, Jell JS, Jones OA, Mather, Talbot FH. (Eds) Proceedings of the Second International Coral Reef Symposium Volume 1 Great Barrier Reef Committee, Brisbane, Australia, 269–283. [Google Scholar]
  168. Pillai NGK. (2001) On some polychaetes from Cochin estuary. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the India 43: 120–135. [Google Scholar]
  169. Piquet AMT, Bolthuis H, Meredith MP, Buma AGJ. (2011) Shifts in coastal Antarctic marine microbial communities during and after melt water-related surface stratification. Federation of European Microbiological Societies Microbiology and Ecology 76: 413–427. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01062.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Pleijel F. (2007) Polychaetes of New Caledonia. In: Payri CE, Richer de Forges B. (Eds) Compendium of marine species of New Caledonia. Documentation Scientifique et Technique du Centre Institut Recherche et Documentation Nouméa, Papeete, New Caledonia, 175–181. [Google Scholar]
  171. Pollock LW. (1998) A practical guide to the marine animals of northeastern North America. Rütgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 367 pp. [Google Scholar]
  172. Posey MH, Alphin TD, Banner D, Vose F, Lindberg W. (1998) Temporal variability, diversity and guild structure of a benthic community in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Bulletin of Marine Science 63: 143–155. [Google Scholar]
  173. Pratt HS. (1923) A manual of the common invertebrate animals exclusive of insects. McClurg, Chicago, 737 pp. [Google Scholar]
  174. Pratt HS. (1951) A manual of the common invertebrate animals, revised edition McClurg, Chicago, 854 pp. [Google Scholar]
  175. Quatrefages A. (1866) Histoire naturelle des annélids marins et d’eau douce. Annélides et gephyriens. Volumes 1-2(Part 1). Librarie Encyclopédique de Roret, Paris, 794 pp. [Google Scholar]
  176. Rajasekaran R, Fernando OL. (2012) Polychaetes of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. In: Venkataraman K. (Ed.) Ecology of faunal communities on the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Springer, Berlin, 1–22. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-28335-2_1 [Google Scholar]
  177. Rasheed S, Mustaquim J. (2003) Scale bearing worms (Annelida: Polychaeta) of the family Polynoidae from the coastal waters of Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Marine Sciences 12: 49–82. [Google Scholar]
  178. Read G, Fauchald K. (2015) World Polychaeta database. World Register of Marine Species. http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=129496
  179. Reimer AA. (1976) Succession of invertebrates in vacant tests of Tetraclita stalactifera panamensis. Marine Biology 35: 239–251. doi: 10.1007/BF00396872 [Google Scholar]
  180. Reish DJ. (1968) A biological survey of Bahia de Los Angeles, Gulf of California, Mexico. II. Benthic polychaetous annelids. Transactions of the San Diego Society of Natural History 15: 67–106. [Google Scholar]
  181. Renaud JC. (1956) A report on some polychaetous annelids from the Miami-Bimini Area. American Museum Novitates 1812: 1–40. [Google Scholar]
  182. Rioja E. (1941) Estudios anelidológicos. III. Datos para el conocimiento de la fauna de poliquetos de las costas del Pacìfico de México. Anales del Instituto de Biologia de México 12: 669–746. [Google Scholar]
  183. Rioja E. (1947) Estudios anelidologicos XVII.Contribucion al conocimiento de los anelidos poliquetos de Baja California y Mar de Cortes. Anales del Instituto de Biologia de México 18: 197–224. [Google Scholar]
  184. Rioja E. (1958) Estudios anelidologicos XXII. Datos para el conocimiento de la fauna de anélidos poliquetos de las costas orientales de México. Anales del Instituto de Biologia de México 29: 219–301. [Google Scholar]
  185. Rioja E. (1962) Estudios anelidologicos XXVI. Algunos anelidos poliquetos de las costas del Pacìfico de México. Anales del Instituto de Biologia de México 33: 131–229. [Google Scholar]
  186. Rivera CG. (2008) Checklist of polychaetes (Annelida: Polychaeta) from El Salvador, eastern Pacific. Check List 4: 18–30. doi: 10.15560/4.1.18 [Google Scholar]
  187. Rizzo AE, Steiner TM, Pardo EV, Nogueira JMM, Fukuda MV, Santos CSG, Amaral ACZ. (2011) Polychaeta. In: Amaral ACZ, Nallin SAH. (Eds) Biodiversidades e ecossistemas bentônicos marinhos do litoral norte de São Paulo, sudeste do Brasil. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, 126–146.
  188. Rodríguez-Gómez H. (1979) Poliquetos de aguas someras coletados en las Islas del Rosario. Instituto de Anales del Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas Punta de Betin 11: 347–367. [Google Scholar]
  189. Rodríguez-Gómez H. (1988) Contribución al conocimiento de los Anélidos (Annelida: Polychaeta) de aguas someras en la Bahía de Nenguange Parque Nacional Natural Tayrona, Colombia. Trianea 2: 403–443. [Google Scholar]
  190. Romero L, Paredes C, Chavez R. (1988) Estrutura de la macrofauna asociada a los rizoides de Lessonia sp. (Laminariales, Phaeophyta). Boletin del Instituto de Mar del Peru Volume Extra 1: 133–139. [Google Scholar]
  191. Ruff RE. (1995) Family Polynoidae Malmgren, 1867. In: Blake JA, Hilbig B, Scott PH. (Eds) Taxonomic atlas of the benthic fauna of the Santa Maria Basin and western Santa Barbara Channel. Volume 5–the Annelida Part 2-Polychaeta: Phyllodocida (Syllidae and scale-bearing families), Amphinomida, and Eunicida. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, California, 105–166. [Google Scholar]
  192. Rullier F. (1974) Quelques annélides polychètes de Cuba recueillies dans les éponges. Travaux du Museum d’Histoire Naturelle “Grigore Antipa” 14: 9–77. [Google Scholar]
  193. Rullier F, Amoureux L. (1979) Campagne de la Calypso au large des côtes atlantiques de l´ Amerique du Sud (1961–1962). I. 33. Annélides polychétes. Annales de l‘ Institute Océanografique Supplement 55: 145–206. [Google Scholar]
  194. Sagasti A, Schaffner LC, Duffy JE. (2000) Epifaunal communities thrive in an estuary with hypoxic episodes. Estuaries 23: 474–487. doi: 10.2307/1353140 [Google Scholar]
  195. Salazar-Silva P. (2006) Scaleworms (Polychaeta: Polynoidae) from the Mexican Pacific and some other Eastern Pacific sites. Investigaciones Marinas de Valparaíso 34(2): 143–161. doi: 10.4067/s0717-71782006000200014 [Google Scholar]
  196. Salazar-Vallejo SI. (1996) Lista de especies y bibliografìa de poliquetos (Polychaeta) del Gran Caribe. Anales del Instituto de Biologia Universidad Nacional Autonoma de México Série Zoologia 67: 1–50. [Google Scholar]
  197. Salazar-Vallejo SI, Eibye-Jacobsen D. (2012) Annulata Orstediana: Publication dates, composition and annotated taxonomic list, with some comments on Hemipodus (Polychaeta: Glyceridae). Revista de Biologia Tropical 60: 1391–1402. doi: 10.15517/rbt.v60i3.1815 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  198. Salazar-Vallejo SI, Londoño-Mesa MH. (2004) Lista de especies y bibliografia de poliquetos (Polychaeta) del Pacifico Oriental Tropical. Anales del Instituto de Biologia Universidad Nacional Autonoma de México Série Zoologia 75: 9–97. [Google Scholar]
  199. San Martìn G, Aguirre O, Baratech L. (1986) Anélidos poliquetos procedentes de la I Expedición Cubana-Española a la Isla de la Juventud y Archipiélago de los Canerreos. I. Familias Polynoidae, Sigalionidae, Pholoidae y Pisionidae. Revista de Investigaciones Marinas 7: 3–16. [Google Scholar]
  200. Santhakumari V. (1973) A brief account of the commensals, associates andpredators of the marine wood boring animals. Mahasagar 6: 178–181. [Google Scholar]
  201. Sarma ALN. (1974) The phytal fauna of Ulva fasciata off Visakhapatnan Coast. Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences Section B 80: 147–161. [Google Scholar]
  202. Sato M. (2001) Crustaceans and polychaetes collected at the proposed site for the nuclear power plant in Nagasima, Kaminoseki-cho, Yamaguchi Prefecture. In: Ankei Y. (Ed.) [The biodiversity of Nagashima Island, Setouchi Inland Sea, Japan] Reports of the Chugoku-Shikoku Branch of the Ecological Society of Japan // Ecological Society of Japan-China Shikoku District Bulletin 59: 11–13. [In Japanese]
  203. Seidler HJ. (1923) Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Polynoiden I. Archiv für Naturgeschichte 89(Abt. A/11): 1–217. [Google Scholar]
  204. Seidler HJ. (1924) Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Polynoiden I. Archiv für Naturgeschichte A 89: 1–217. [Google Scholar]
  205. Shin PKS. (1982) Some polychaetous annelids from Hong Kong waters. In: Morton B, Tseng CK. (Eds) Proceedings of the First International Marine Biological Workshop: the marine flora and fauna of Hong Kong and southern China, Hong Kong, 1980. Hong Kong University, Hong Kong, 161–172. [Google Scholar]
  206. Shin PKS. (1998) Biodiversity of subtidal benthic polychaetes in Hong Kong coastal waters. In: Morton B. (Ed.) The marine biology of the South China Sea. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on the Marine Biology of the South China Sea. Hong Kong University, Hong Kong, 57–74. [Google Scholar]
  207. Shin PKS. (2000) The detection of ecological stress in a sub-tropical macrobenthic community in Hong Kong. Asian Marine Biology 17: 149–160. [Google Scholar]
  208. Smith RI. (1964) Keys to marine invertebrates of the Woods Hole Region. Annelida. Contribution of the Systematics Ecology Program Marine Biological Laboratory Woods Hole 11: 47–83. [Google Scholar]
  209. Solìs-Weiss V, Bertrand Y, Helleouet MN, Pleijel F. (2004) Types of Polychaetous annelids at the Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris. Zoosystema 26: 377–384. [Google Scholar]
  210. Soota TD, Misra A, Chakraborty RK. (1980) Polychaete fauna of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Records of the Zoological Survey of India 77: 55–69. [Google Scholar]
  211. Soota TD, Misra A, Chakraborty RK. (1981) Polychaete fauna of Gujarat coast. Records of the Zoological Survey of India 79: 93–104. [Google Scholar]
  212. Srikrishnadhas B, Ramamoorthi K, Balasubrahmanyan K. (1987) Polychaetes of Porto Novo waters. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India 29: 134–139. [Google Scholar]
  213. Stainken DM. (1984) Organic pollution and the macrobenthos of Raritan Bay. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 3: 95–111. doi: 10.1002/etc.5620030112 [Google Scholar]
  214. Steimle FW Jr., Caracciolo-Ward J. (1989) A reassessment of the status of the benthic macrofauna of the Raritan estuary. Estuaries 12: 145–156. doi: 10.2307/1351819 [Google Scholar]
  215. Steinbeck J, Ricketts EF. (1941) The Sea of Cortez. A leisurely journal of travel and research.With a scientific appendix comprising materials for a source book on the marine animals of the Panamic faunal Province. Viking, New York, 598 pp. [Google Scholar]
  216. Stimpson W. (1860) Notes on North Amercian Crustacea, in the Museum of the Smithsonian Institution, No. II. Annals of the Lyceum of Natural History of New York 7: 177–246. [Google Scholar]
  217. Struck TH, Halanych KM. (2010) Origins of holopelagic Typhloscolecidae and Lopadorhynchidae within Phyllodocidae (Phyllodocida, Annelida). Zoologica Scripta 39: 269–275. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-6409.2010.00418.x [Google Scholar]
  218. Struck TH, Nesnidal MP, Purschke G, Halanych KM. (2008) Detecting possibly saturated positions in 18s and 28s sequences and their influence on phylogenetic reconstruction of Annelida (Lophotrochozoa). Molecular Phylogenetic and Evolution 48: 628–645. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.05.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  219. Sukumaran S, Devi KS. (2009) Polychaete diversity and its relevance in the rapid environmnetalassessment of Mumbai Port. Current Science 97: 1439–1444. [Google Scholar]
  220. Summer F, Osburn RC, Cole LJ. (1913) Annulata. A Biological survey of the waters of the Woods Hole and vicinity Part 2. Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Fisheries 31: 615–636. [Google Scholar]
  221. Tagatz ME, Ivey JM, Dalbo CE, Oglesby JL. (1982) Responses of developing estuarine macrobenthic communities of drilling muds. Estuaries 5: 131–137. doi: 10.2307/1352110 [Google Scholar]
  222. Tampi PRS, Rangarajan K. (1964) Some polychaetous annelids from the Andaman waters. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India 6: 98–123. [Google Scholar]
  223. Tebble N. (1955) The polychaete fauna of the Gold Coast. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Zoology 3: 61–148. [Google Scholar]
  224. Tebble N, Chambers S. (1982) Polychaetes from Scottish waters. A guide to identification, part 1. Family Polynoidae. Royal Scottish Museum Studies, Edinburgh, 73 pp. [Google Scholar]
  225. Treadwell AL. (1914) Polychaetous annelids of the Pacific coast in the Collection of the Zoological Museum of the University of California. University of California Publications in Zoology 13: 175–234. [Google Scholar]
  226. Treadwell AL. (1937) The Templeton Croker Expedition. VIII. Polychaetous annelids from the west coast of Lower California, the Gulf of California and Clarion Island. Zoologica New York 22: 139–160. [Google Scholar]
  227. Treadwell AL. (1939a) New polychaetous annelids from New England, Texas and Puerto Rico. American Museum Novitates 1023: 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  228. Treadwell AL. (1939b) Polychaetous annelids of Porto Rico and vicinity. Scientific Survey of Porto Rico and the Virgin Islands. The New York Academy of Science 16(2): 151–319. [Google Scholar]
  229. Uschakov PV. (1982) Fauna of the U. S. S. R., New Series. Polychaeta. Volume II, part 1. Polychaetes of the suborder Aphroditiformia of the Arctic Ocean and the northwestern part of the Pacific Ocean, families Aphroditidae and Polynoidae. Zoological Institute of the USSR, Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 272 pp [In Russian] [Google Scholar]
  230. Van der Heiden AM, Hendrickx ME. (1982) Inventario de la fauna marina y costera del sur de Sinaloa, México, Segundo Informe. Universidade Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Ciencias Marinas y Limnologìa, Sinaloa, 135 pp. [Google Scholar]
  231. Von Prahl H, Guhl F, Gröl M. (1979) Poliquetos de Gorgona. In: Von Prahl H, Guhl F, Gröl M. (Eds) Gorgona. Futura, Bogotá, 131–140 [Google Scholar]
  232. Verrill AE. (1873) Report upon the invertebrate animals of Vineyard Sound and the adjacent waters, with an account of the physical characters of the region. Report of the United States Commission for Fisheries 1871–72: 295–778. [Google Scholar]
  233. Verrill AE. (1882) New England Annelida. Part 1. Historical sketch, with annotated list of the species hitherto recorded. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences 4: 285–324. [Google Scholar]
  234. Verrill AE, Smith SI. (1874) Report upon the invertebrate animals of Vineyard Sound and the adjacent waters, with an account of the physical characters of the region. Report of the United States Commission of Fisheries 324: 295–852. [Google Scholar]
  235. Von Prahl H, Guhl F, Gröl M. (1979) Poliquetos de Gorgona. In: Von Prahl H, Guhl F, Gröl M. (Eds) Gorgona. Futura, Bogotá, 131–140. [Google Scholar]
  236. Wang JJ, Huang ZG. (1994) Fouling polychaetes of Hong Kong and adjacent waters. Asian Marine Biology 10: 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  237. Warren W. (1942) A survey of the annelid worms of the Grand Isle region. Bios Mount Vernon Iowa 13: 39–46. [Google Scholar]
  238. Webster HE. (1879) Annelida Chaetopoda of the Virginian coast. Transactions Albany Institute New York 9: 202–272. [Google Scholar]
  239. Wehe T. (2006) Revision of scale worms (Polychaeta: Aphroditoidea) occurring in the seas surrounding the Arabian Peninsula, Part 1. Polynoidae. Fauna of Arabia 22: 23–197. [Google Scholar]
  240. Wehe T, Fiege D. (2002) Annotated checklist of the polychaete species of the seas surrounding the Arabian Peninsula: Red Sea. Gulf of Aden, Arabian Sea, Gulf of Oman, Arabian Gulf. Fauna of Arabia 19: 7–238. [Google Scholar]
  241. Wells HW. (1961) The fauna of oyster beds, with special reference to the salinity factor. Ecological Monographs 31: 239–266. doi: 10.2307/1948554 [Google Scholar]
  242. Wells HW, Gray I. (1964) Polychaetous annelids of the Cape Hatteras area. Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 80: 70–78. [Google Scholar]
  243. Wesenberg-Lund E. (1949) Polychaetes of the Iranian Gulf. In: Jessen K, Spärck R. (Eds) Danish scientific investigations in Iran 4: 247–400.
  244. Wesenberg-Lund E. (1962) Reports of the Lund University Chile Expedition 1948–49. 43. Polychaeta Errantia. Acta Universitatis Lundensis, Ser. N.F. 257(12): 1–137. [Google Scholar]
  245. Weston D. (1984) Family Polynoidae Malmgren, 1867. In: Uebelacker JM, Johnson PG. (Eds) Taxonomic guide to the polychaetes of the northern Gulf of Mexico. Volume 3 Mobile, Vittor, Alabama, 21.1–21.30. [Google Scholar]
  246. Willey A. (1905) Report on the Polychaeta collected by Professor Herdman, at Ceylon, in 1902. Ceylon Pearl Oyster Fisheries Supplementary Reports 30: 243–324. [Google Scholar]
  247. Williams JD. (2003) The not so lonely lives of hermit crabs: studies on hermit crab symbionts. Hofstra Horizons Fall 4: 15–18. [Google Scholar]
  248. Williams JD, McDermott JJ. (2004) Hermit crab biocoenoses: a worldwide review of the diversity and natural history of hermit crab associates. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 305: 1–128. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2004.02.020 [Google Scholar]
  249. Wood JG. (1885) Animate creation: Popular edition of “Our living world”, a natural history, Volume 3 Hess, New York, 114 pp. doi: 10.5962/bhl.title.49480 [Google Scholar]
  250. Wu B, Wu Q, Qiu J, Lu H. (1997) Fauna Sinica: Phylum Annelida, Class Polychaeta, Order Phyllodocimorpha. Science, Beijing, 329 pp [In Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  251. Wu SK. (1968) On some polychaete worms from the northern coast of Taiwan. Bulletin of the Institute of Zoology Academia Sinica 7: 27–48. [Google Scholar]
  252. Yan SK, Huang ZG. (1993) Biofouling of ships in Daya Bay, China. In: Morton B. (Ed.) The marine biology of the South China Sea. Proceedings of the First International Conference on the Marine Biology of Hong Kong and the South China Sea, Hong Kong, 28 October–3 November 1990 Hong Kong University, Hong Kong, 131–136. [Google Scholar]
  253. Yentsch AE, Carriker MR, Parker RH, Zullo VA. (1966) Marine and estuarine environments, organisms and geology of the Cape Cod Region. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, 178 pp. [Google Scholar]
  254. Zenetos A, Çinar ME, Pancucci HA, Papadopoulou MA, Harmelin JG, Furnari G, Andaloro F, Bellou N, Streftaris N, Zibrowius H. (2005) Annotated list of marine alien species in the Mediterranean with records of the worst invasive species. Mediterranean Marine Science 6: 63–118. doi: 10.12681/mms.186 [Google Scholar]
  255. Zenetos A, Verlaque M, Gofas S, Çinar ME, Garcia Raso E, Azzuro E, Bilecenoglu M, Froglia C, Siokou I, Bianchi CN, Morri C, Sfriso A, San Martin G, Giangrande A, Katagan T, Ballesteros E, Ramos Espla A, Mastrototaro F, Ocana O, Zingone A, Cantone G, Gambi MC, Streftaris N. (2010) Alien species in the Mediterranean MSFD areas by 2010. Part 1. Spatial distribution. Mediterranean Marine Science 11: 381–493. doi: 10.12681/mms.87 [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

XML Treatment for Lepidonotus
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus arenosus
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus brasiliensis
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus brasiliensis laevis
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus caeruleus
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus carinulatus
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus crosslandi
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus crosslandi peruana
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus furcillatus
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus hupferi
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus margaritaceus
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus natalensis
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus nesophilus
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus panamensis
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus savignyi
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus sublevis
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus tenuisetosus
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus tomentosus
XML Treatment for Lepidonotus variabilis

Articles from ZooKeys are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES