Skip to main content
F1000Research logoLink to F1000Research
. 2015 Aug 24;4:620. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.6962.1

Hypothesis: Is frequent, commercial jet travel by the general public a risk factor for developing cutaneous melanoma?

Harvey Arbesman 1,2,3,a
PMCID: PMC4670002  PMID: 26672515

Abstract

Melanoma incidence has been increasing worldwide over the past 50 years and various risk factors have been identified. Interestingly, multiple studies have shown a multifold increased risk of developing melanoma in jet pilots and airline crew. There has also been a dramatic increase in the availability and frequency of jet travel by the general population during this time period.. Therefore, it is hypothesized that frequent commercial jet travel may represent an additional risk factor for the development of cutaneous melanoma in susceptible individuals of the general public.

Keywords: melanoma, risk factor, epidemiology, jet travel, cosmic radiation

Background

The incidence of cutaneous melanoma in light pigmented individuals worldwide has been steadily increasing over the past 4–5 decades 14. Sun exposure, including intermittent exposure, is an important environmental risk factor for melanoma, along with history of sunburn, residence in equatorial latitudes and tanning bed usage 511. Genetic risk factors include red hair, family history of melanoma, dysplastic nevi, lightly pigmented skin, tendency to burn, inability to tan, and DNA repair defects 12. Phenotypic expressions of gene/environmental interactions are risk factors and include melanocytic nevi (increased total number, multiple atypical [dysplastic], and congenital [particularly large axial lesions with multiple satellites]), ephelides, and personal history of melanoma 12, 13. Non-solar occupational risk factors have also been shown to be associated with the development of melanoma 14. Since no specific currently recognized risk factor adequately explains the rapidly increasing incidence among the general population, the identification of new risk factors that could play a role in melanoma prevention is needed.

Studies from many countries have shown a significant increase in the risk of melanoma in commercial and military pilots; these range from approximately 2 to10 fold 1520. An increased risk has also been shown in some studies of cabin crew 2123. Recently a meta-analysis was published that also showed an increased risk in pilots and cabin crew 24.

Though it is unclear why aircrew have an increased risk of melanoma, one proposed explanation regarding their increased risk has focused on the exposure to cosmic ionizing radiation present at cruising altitudes of 30,000 feet or higher 2534. Currently, commercial jets frequently cruise at an altitude that results in cosmic radiation exposure 26, 28, 3033. In addition, the cosmic radiation exposure is increased with higher altitude flights and long-haul routes 25. Cosmic ionizing radiation contains multiple particles that can damage DNA 28, 32. Epidemiologic studies have reported a possible relationship between melanoma and exposure to ionizing radiation in other occupational settings 3537. A recent systematic review regarding cosmic radiation and cancer assessed the role cosmic radiation plays in the development of cancer as compared with other lifestyle factors 25.

Another proposed explanation for the documented increased risk among pilots is their increased exposure to UV light during flight 24, 38. Recently an analysis was done and found greater amounts of UVA exposure through the windows of jets 39. At this time, it is unclear whether increased UVA exposure, cosmic ionizing radiation, circadian rhythm disturbance and/or other undetermined factors are contributing to this increased risk of melanoma in pilots and cabin crew 26.

Presentation of the hypothesis

It is hypothesized that individuals of the general population who frequently travel by jet plane may also have an increased risk of developing cutaneous melanoma in a similar fashion as pilots and cabin crew. This hypothesized risk factor may play a role in the development of melanoma due to a variety of potentially harmful exposures associated with frequent jet travel that could interact synergistically with other known genetic and environmental risk factors in susceptible individuals. This hypothesis is based on the findings that both pilots and cabin crew, generally healthier than the general public 18, and with a prevalence of skin cancer risk factors similar to that of the general public 21, 40, have a dramatically higher risk of melanoma.

Since the late 1950s, commercial jets have begun to cruise at an altitude of 30,000 feet or higher. This major change in the flying altitude of air travel is consistent with the temporal nature of the rapid increase in the incidence of melanoma. During the past 50 years, the availability and frequency of jet travel among the general public have increased dramatically. In addition, with the deregulation of the airline industry in the 1970s, and the resulting decrease in fares, a higher percentage of the overall population began to experience jet travel. An ecologic study found an association between accessibility to air travel and the incidence rate of melanoma 41.

A widely accepted epidemiologic finding consistent with the proposed hypothesis is that intermittent sun exposure is an independent risk factor for melanoma 5, 11. The correlation between melanoma incidence and ‘sun holidays’ 4246 has been primarily interpreted as secondary to intermittent sun exposure. The proposed hypothesis suggests that the increased risk associated with ‘sun holidays,’ may also be related to jet travel and the resultant exposures associated with jet travel to those vacation destinations. Higher socioeconomic status (SES) is also a risk factor for melanoma development 42, 47; and higher SES is associated with increased jet travel and ‘sun holidays,’ 44, 45, 48 all findings consistent with the hypothesis.

Testing the hypothesis

A case-control methodology could be utilized to test this hypothesis. One would assess jet travel histories in melanoma patients and comparable controls, controlling for known risk factors such as age, skin type, genetic host factors and sun exposure history. One would obtain assessments of subjects’ jet travel history in terms of frequency, duration of flights and altitude 49, 50. Assessment of travel routes, season of travel and increased sunspot activity during flights should also be undertaken. It would be necessary to disentangle intermittent sun exposure history from jet travel history.

Implications of the hypothesis

It is hypothesized that frequent commercial jet travel by the general public may increase the risk of developing melanoma due to various harmful exposures associated with frequent jet travel. This melanoma and jet travel hypothesis has potential for reducing melanoma-associated morbidity and mortality and warrants properly designed analytic epidemiologic evaluation to assess the validity of this hypothesis. In addition, if demonstrated to be a risk factor, evaluation of the underlying mechanisms behind this increased risk may lead to the expansion of basic science research of etiologic factors of melanoma and of cancer in general.

Acknowledgements

I thank Joshua Arbesman, MD, James Marshall, PhD and Thomas Helm, MD for fruitful discussions about the hypothesis and reading drafts of the manuscript.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

[version 1; referees: 2 approved

References

  • 1. Erdmann F, Lortet-Tieulent J, Schüz J, et al. : International trends in the incidence of malignant melanoma 1953-2008--are recent generations at higher or lower risk? Int J Cancer. 2013;132(2):385–400. 10.1002/ijc.27616 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Holterhues C, Hollestein LM, Nijsten T, et al. : Burden of disease due to cutaneous melanoma has increased in the Netherlands since 1991. Br J Dermatol. 2013;169(2):389–97. 10.1111/bjd.12346 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Erdei E, Torres SM: A new understanding in the epidemiology of melanoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2010;10(11):1811–23. 10.1586/era.10.170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. de Vries E, Bray FI, Coebergh JW, et al. : Changing epidemiology of malignant cutaneous melanoma in Europe 1953-1997: rising trends in incidence and mortality but recent stabilizations in western Europe and decreases in Scandinavia. Int J Cancer. 2003;107(1):119–26. 10.1002/ijc.11360 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Chang YM, Barrett JH, Bishop DT, et al. : Sun exposure and melanoma risk at different latitudes: a pooled analysis of 5700 cases and 7216 controls. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38(3):814–30. 10.1093/ije/dyp166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Gandini S, Sera F, Cattaruzza MS, et al. : Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: II. Sun exposure. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41(1):45–60. 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.10.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Solomon CC, White E, Kristal AR, et al. : Melanoma and lifetime UV radiation. Cancer Causes Control. 2004;15(9):893–902. 10.1007/s10552-004-1142-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Lea CS, Scotto JA, Buffler PA, et al. : Ambient UVB and melanoma risk in the United States: a case-control analysis. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17(6):447–53. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.01.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Gandini S, Stanganelli I, Magi S, et al. : Melanoma attributable to sunbed use and tan seeking behaviours: an Italian survey. Eur J Dermatol. 2014;24(1):35–40. 10.1684/ejd.2013.2214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Boniol M, Autier P, Boyle P, et al. : Cutaneous melanoma attributable to sunbed use: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2012;345:e4757. 10.1136/bmj.e4757 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Elwood JM, Jopson J: Melanoma and sun exposure: an overview of published studies. Int J Cancer. 1997;73(2):198–203. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19971009)73:2<198::AID-IJC6>3.0.CO;2-R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Gandini S, Sera F, Cattaruzza MS, et al. : Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: III. Family history, actinic damage and phenotypic factors. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41(14):2040–59. 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.03.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Gandini S, Sera F, Cattaruzza MS, et al. : Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: I. Common and atypical naevi. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41(1):28–44. 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.10.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Fortes C, de Vries E: Nonsolar occupational risk factors for cutaneous melanoma. Int J Dermatol. 2008;47(4):319–28. 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2008.03653.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Yong LC, Pinkerton LE, Yiin JH, et al. : Mortality among a cohort of U.S. commercial airline cockpit crew. Am J Ind Med. 2014;57(8):906–14. 10.1002/ajim.22318 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Hammer GP, Auvinen A, De Stavola BL, et al. : Mortality from cancer and other causes in commercial airline crews: a joint analysis of cohorts from 10 countries. Occup Environ Med. 2014;71(5):313–22. 10.1136/oemed-2013-101395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. dos Santos Silva I, De Stavola B, Pizzi C, et al. : Cancer incidence in professional flight crew and air traffic control officers: disentangling the effect of occupational versus lifestyle exposures. Int J Cancer. 2013;132(2):374–84. 10.1002/ijc.27612 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Sykes AJ, Larsen PD, Griffiths RF, et al. : A study of airline pilot morbidity. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2012;83(10):1001–5. 10.3357/ASEM.3380.2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Buja A, Lange JH, Perissinotto E, et al. : Cancer incidence among male military and civil pilots and flight attendants: an analysis on published data. Toxicol Ind Health. 2005;21(10):273–82. 10.1191/0748233705th238oa [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Rafnsson V, Hrafnkelsson J, Tulinius H: Incidence of cancer among commercial airline pilots. Occup Environ Med. 2000;57(3):175–9. 10.1136/oem.57.3.175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Kojo K, Helminen M, Pukkala E, et al. : Risk factors for skin cancer among Finnish airline cabin crew. Ann Occup Hyg. 2013;57(6):695–704. 10.1093/annhyg/mes106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Pukkala E, Helminen M, Haldorsen T, et al. : Cancer incidence among Nordic airline cabin crew. Int J Cancer. 2012;131(12):2886–97. 10.1002/ijc.27551 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Buja A, Mastrangelo G, Perissinotto E, et al. : Cancer incidence among female flight attendants: a meta-analysis of published data. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2006;15(1):98–105. 10.1089/jwh.2006.15.98 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Sanlorenzo M, Wehner MR, Linos E, et al. : The risk of melanoma in airline pilots and cabin crew: a meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151(1):51–8. 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.1077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Di Trolio R, Di Lorenzo G, Fumo B, et al. : Cosmic radiation and cancer: is there a link? Future Oncol. 2015;11(7):1123–35. 10.2217/fon.15.29 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Grajewski B, Pinkerton LE: Exposure assessment at 30 000 feet: challenges and future directions. Ann Occup Hyg. 2013;57(6):692–4. 10.1093/annhyg/met039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Schüz J: Airline crew cohorts: is there more to learn regarding their cancer risk? Occup Environ Med. 2014;71(5):307. 10.1136/oemed-2013-102026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Sigurdson AJ, Ron E: Cosmic radiation exposure and cancer risk among flight crew. Cancer Invest. 2004;22(5):743–61. 10.1081/CNV-200032767 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Lim MK: Cosmic rays: are air crew at risk? Occup Environ Med. 2002;59(7):428–32; discussion 432–3. 10.1136/oem.59.7.428 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Friedberg W, Copeland K, Duke FE, et al. : Radiation exposure during air travel: guidance provided by the Federal Aviation Administration for air carrier crews. Health Phys. 2000;79(5):591–5. 10.1097/00004032-200011000-00018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Kendall GM: Factors affecting cosmic-ray doses at aircraft altitudes. Health Phys. 2000;79(5):560–2. 10.1097/00004032-200011000-00013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Goldhagen P: Overview of aircraft radiation exposure and recent ER-2 measurements. Health Phys. 2000;79(5):526–44. 10.1097/00004032-200011000-00009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Townsend LW: Invited editorial: Radiation exposures of aircrew in high altitude flight. J Radiol Prot. 2001;21(1):5–8. 10.1088/0952-4746/21/1/003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Menzel HG, O'Sullivan D, Beck P, et al. : European measurements of aircraft crew exposure to cosmic radiation. Health Phys. 2000;79(5):563–7. 10.1097/00004032-200011000-00014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Fink CA, Bates MN: Melanoma and ionizing radiation: is there a causal relationship? Radiat Res. 2005;164(5):701–10. 10.1667/RR3447.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Freedman DM, Sigurdson A, Rao RS, et al. : Risk of melanoma among radiologic technologists in the United States. Int J Cancer. 2003;103(4):556–62. 10.1002/ijc.10854 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Caldwell GG, Kelley D, Zack M, et al. : Mortality and cancer frequency among military nuclear test (Smoky) participants, 1957 through 1979. JAMA. 1983;250(5):620–4. 10.1001/jama.1983.03340050032024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Chorley AC, Evans BJ, Benwell MJ: Civilian pilot exposure to ultraviolet and blue light and pilot use of sunglasses. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2011;82(9):895–900. 10.3357/ASEM.3034.2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Sanlorenzo M, Vujic I, Posch C, et al. : The risk of melanoma in pilots and cabin crew: UV measurements in flying airplanes. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151(4):450–2. 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.4643 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Rafnsson V, Hrafnkelsson J, Tulinius H, et al. : Risk factors for cutaneous malignant melanoma among aircrews and a random sample of the population. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60(11):815–20. 10.1136/oem.60.11.815 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Agredano YZ, Chan JL, Kimball RC, et al. : Accessibility to air travel correlates strongly with increasing melanoma incidence. Melanoma Res. 2006;16(1):77–81. 10.1097/01.cmr.0000195696.50390.23 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Idorn LW, Wulf HC: Socioeconomic status and cutaneous malignant melanoma in Northern Europe. Br J Dermatol. 2014;170(4):787–93. 10.1111/bjd.12800 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Veierød MB, Adami HO, Lund E, et al. : Sun and solarium exposure and melanoma risk: effects of age, pigmentary characteristics, and nevi. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19(1):111–20. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0567 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Bentham G, Aase A: Incidence of malignant melanoma of the skin in Norway, 1955-1989: associations with solar ultraviolet radiation, income and holidays abroad. Int J Epidemiol. 1996;25(6):1132–8. 10.1093/ije/25.6.1132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Westerdahl J, Olsson H, Ingvar C, et al. : Southern travelling habits with special reference to tumour site in Swedish melanoma patients. Anticancer Res. 1992;12(5):1539–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Osterlind A, Tucker MA, Stone BJ, et al. : The Danish case-control study of cutaneous malignant melanoma. II. Importance of UV-light exposure. Int J Cancer. 1988;42(3):319–24. 10.1002/ijc.2910420303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Clegg LX, Reichman ME, Miller BA, et al. : Impact of socioeconomic status on cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis: selected findings from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results: National Longitudinal Mortality Study. Cancer Causes Control. 2009;20(4):417–35. 10.1007/s10552-008-9256-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Veierød MB, Weiderpass E, Thörn M, et al. : A prospective study of pigmentation, sun exposure, and risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma in women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95(20):1530–8. 10.1093/jnci/djg075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Hammer GP, Zeeb H, Tveten U, et al. : Comparing different methods of estimating cosmic radiation exposure of airline personnel. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2000;39(4):227–31. 10.1007/s004110000071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Kojo K, Aspholm R, Auvinen A: Occupational radiation dose estimation for Finnish aircraft cabin attendants. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2004;30(2):157–63. 10.5271/sjweh.773 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
F1000Res. 2015 Nov 30. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.7498.r11326

Referee response for version 1

Gabriella Fabbrocini 1

The hypothesis put forward by the author is interesting, yet hard to prove. it is extremely difficult to separate the weight of individual exposures: the cosmic radiation at high altitudes and that related to sun exposure of the trip. The bibliography is extensive and still valid. Considering the bases from which originates the article, or the increased incidence of melanoma in the last decades and the multifactoriality, it might be interesting to start the case control study that the author sets out to accomplish. It would be necessary to consider some essential factors, including the frequency of air travel, the duration of the flight, altitude, intermittent sun exposure of patients during their trip.

I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

F1000Res. 2015 Sep 29. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.7498.r10379

Referee response for version 1

Robyn Lucas 1

The authors raise the hypothesis that commercial jet travel by the general public may increase the risk of developing cutaneous melanoma through increased exposure to cosmic radiation or UVA radiation. Previous studies have shown an increased risk of melanoma in flight crews and pilots. The hypothesis in relation to UVA seems unlikely, given that most air travellers are well-clothed. The hypothesis in relation to cosmic radiation needs stronger evidence of the measured levels within aircraft. The author proposes a case-control study, but this seems unlikely to provide valid results - the most likely explanation of an increased risk of melanoma in flight crews and pilots is higher sun exposure at the locations that they fly to, especially of the intermittent high dose pattern that confers particular risk of melanoma. However sun exposure is poorly reported (as would be the measure of exposure in a case-control study) while air travel likely to be well-reported (and able to be validated). It will be impossible to clearly separate these "exposures".  There is likely to be a very high correlation between a history of air travel and of sunny holidays in people with melanoma, such that a history of air travel is a proxy for high dose intermittent sun exposure. Findings resulting from such a study are highly likely to be spurious associations. It is an interesting hypothesis - a start would be to measure levels of cosmic radiation inside passenger aircraft, more clearly make the link between cosmic radiation and melanoma, and assess the body sites affected in cabin crew and pilots who develop melanoma.

I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

F1000Res. 2015 Sep 2. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.7498.r10189

Referee response for version 1

Desiree Ratner 1

The hypothesis, “Is frequent, commercial jet travel by the general public a risk factor for developing cutaneous melanoma?”, provides an interesting perspective on possible reasons for the increasing incidence of melanoma worldwide. The author cites multiple studies documenting a significant increase in melanoma risk among commercial and military pilots as well as cabin crew. Possible reasons for this increase include exposure to cosmic ionizing radiation at cruising altitudes of 30,000 feet or higher, particularly on long haul routes, as well as increased exposure to UV light during flight. Given that a significant portion of the world’s population now takes advantage of the increased availability and frequency of jet travel, it is possible that the increased incidence of melanoma may be, in part, due to increased exposure to cosmic rays and/or UV exposure during high altitude jet travel.

The author suggests that a case-control methodology be used to test his hypothesis, by assessing jet travel histories in melanoma patients and comparable controls, controlling for known risk factors such as age, skin type, and exposure history. It would be necessary to look at frequency of air travel, duration of flights, and altitude, and to disentangle patients’ intermittent sun exposure history from their jet travel history. If the hypothesis that frequent commercial jet travel represents an additional risk factor for developing cutaneous melanoma proves to be true, not only will it be necessary to look at the mechanisms behind this increased risk, but it will also be necessary to develop appropriate screening and preventive measures to decrease the morbidity and mortality to the greatest degree possible from air travel associated melanoma.

I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.


Articles from F1000Research are provided here courtesy of F1000 Research Ltd

RESOURCES