Skip to main content
PMC home page
Nature Portfolio logoLink to Nature Portfolio
. 2015 Nov 26;6:10016. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10016

Large increases in carbon burial in northern lakes during the Anthropocene

Adam J Heathcote 1,2,a, N John Anderson 3, Yves T Prairie 1, Daniel R Engstrom 2, Paul A del Giorgio 1
PMCID: PMC4674672  PMID: 26607672

Abstract

Northern forests are important ecosystems for carbon (C) cycling and lakes within them process and bury large amounts of organic-C. Current burial estimates are poorly constrained and may discount other shifts in organic-C burial driven by global change. Here we analyse a suite of northern lakes to determine trends in organic-C burial throughout the Anthropocene. We found burial rates increased significantly over the last century and are up to five times greater than previous estimates. Despite a correlation with temperature, warming alone did not explain the increase in burial, suggesting the importance of other drivers including atmospherically deposited reactive nitrogen. Upscaling mean lake burial rates for each time period to global northern forests yields up to 4.5 Pg C accumulated in the last 100 years—20% of the total burial over the Holocene. Our results indicate that lakes will become increasingly important for C burial under future global change scenarios.

Inline graphicThe rate at which carbon burial has changed in lakes in response to human-induced global change is poorly understood. Here, the authors show that carbon burial has increased significantly in remote northern lakes along with increased nitrogen deposition and warming over the last century.

The boreal and north-temperate forests contain the highest density of freshwater lakes globally1 and lake sediments represent one of the largest terrestrial stocks of organic carbon (C)2,3. These lakes (hereafter referred to as northern lakes) represent an important link in the global C cycle, sequestering as much as 15% (ref. 4) and evading up to 48% of the terrestrial C that would otherwise be exported to the oceans5. C burial in lakes is the net balance of autotrophic fixation within the lake, transfer of C from terrestrial ecosystems, mineralization and downstream export6. The balance between net C source and sink in northern lakes is delicate and sensitive to global forcing7,8, thus understanding the rates at which lakes process and store C, and how that has changed over time, is critical to assessing the role of lakes in the contemporary global C cycle. As the catchments of most northern lakes are minimally disturbed by human land-use change—otherwise an important driver of burial rates9,10,11,12—organic-C burial in these systems is often calculated as an average since the last de-glaciation (that is, the Holocene epoch ca. 11,700 BP)2,13. There is growing evidence, however, that remote aquatic ecosystems have been affected by human-induced global change drivers14,15 since the turn of the nineteenth century, a time period dubbed the Anthropocene16. This raises the question as to whether the rates of organic-C processing in northern lakes can be considered static over this period and to what extent they may be sensitive to global drivers affecting climate17 and nutrient loading15,18 over the last 150 years.

Previous studies of organic-C burial in northern lakes have focused on either a small number of sites with a relatively high temporal resolution using 210Pb dating6,19 or a larger set of lakes with low temporal resolution (averaging entire Holocene organic-C stock)2. Few, if any, studies have examined northern lakes at high spatial and temporal resolution using consistent methodology for both radioisotopic dating and whole-basin upscaling. Here we incorporate 210Pb-dated sediment cores with measurements of organic carbon content from 101 lakes ranging longitudinally from Alaska to Newfoundland and spanning a latitudinal gradient from 44 to 58° N (Fig. 1a). The suite of lakes are all located within protected regions and have been relatively unimpacted by direct human disturbance to their catchment. Importantly, all rates of organic-C burial reported here have been corrected for sediment focusing and incomplete mineralization of organic C in the most recent surficial sediments (see Methods for a detailed explanation).

Figure 1. Organic-C burial in northern lakes.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a) Map of North America with lakes included in this study coloured by region. The boreal and northern temperate forest biome (referred to as northern forest in this study) is shaded in green. Scale bar, 2,000 km. (b) Mean change in organic-C (ΔOC) burial rates between time periods for lakes in this study for all regions (n=101), British Columbia (n=10), the Great Lakes Region (n=13), Minnesota (n=39), Newfoundland (n=4), Ontario (n=3), Québec (n=28) and southeast Alaska (n=4). Error bars represent the 95% confidence interval around the mean and those that do not overlap zero represent a significant positive increase (t-test, P<0.05). (c) OC burial versus time, binned by 20-year intervals, from 1840 to 2000 AD. All dated sections older than 1840 and younger than 2000 AD were combined into two bins due to a low density of points for those time periods. The median for all bins was fit with a LOWESS smoother (red line), to show the general trend in organic-C burial over time. Boxes represent the interquartile range (IQR) with the median shown as a black bar. Whiskers represent the minimum/maximum value within × 1.5 the IQR with points outside plotted as black dots. (d) LOWESS smoother for OC burial from all lakes in this study versus time (red line) and atmospherically deposited nitrate concentrations (teal line) measured from the Greenland Ice Sheet. Greenland ice core data modified from Hastings et al.20.

For this study we report significant increases in organic-C burial in relatively undisturbed northern lakes over the last 100 years. Although there is a correlation with temperature across our large spatial gradient, warming alone does not fully explain our results. Reactive nitrogen (Nr) deposition is proposed as a driver of increased organic-C burial based on concurrent data from the Greenland Ice Sheet20. These results are the first to show systematic increases in organic-C burial in remote northern lakes and provide further direct evidence of significant ongoing changes to biogeochemical processes in northern landscapes.

Results

Changes to organic-C burial rates over the Anthropocene

We estimate an average post 1900 organic-C burial rate of 13.9±0.6 g C m−2 per year across the northern lakes of North America—a mean rate that is three to five times higher than previously estimated Holocene averages of 2.7 C m−2 per year for Finland2 and 3.8 C m−2 per year for Québec13. Organic-C burial rates were compared between three distinct time periods: pre-1900 (before widespread industrialization in North America), 1900–1950 (the initial phase of population and industrial growth), and 1950 to present (the ‘Great Acceleration' in global industrialization following World War II16). There were significant (P<0.001) increases in organic-C burial from pre-1900–1950 and 1950 to present, although the magnitude of the mean difference between time periods varied by region (Fig. 1b,c). With all lakes combined, organic-C burial increased from an average of 9.5±0.5 g C m−2 per year before 1900 to 12.3±0.8 g C m−2 per year between 1900 and 1950, and to 15.0±0.8 g C m−2 per year between 1950 and present (Table 1). This amounts to a mean lake-specific increase of 5.5 g C m−2 per year across all lakes since 1900.

Table 1. Regional and combined averages (and s.d.) for organic-C burial before and following the Anthropocene.

Region Pre-1900 OC burial (g m−2 per year) 1900–1950 OC burial (g m−2 per year) 1950-Present OC burial (g m−2 per year)
British Columbia (CA) 1.2 (0.9) 2.5 (0.5) 3.5 (1.3)
Great Lakes (USA) 10.8 (7.3) 13.9 (7.2) 19.8 (13.4)
Minnesota (USA) 9.8 (4.3) 13.4 (6.4) 15.4 (5.7)
Newfoundland (CA) 8.4 (7.1) 11.9 (10.7) 15.7 (12.3)
Ontario (CA) 11.0 (2.9) 12.6 (4.5) 11.4 (5.3)
Quebec (CA) 10.2 (10.3) 11.5 (11.6) 16.7 (13.9)
SE Alaska (USA) 9.8 (1.6) 9.7 (1.6) 12.5 (3.1)
All Regions 9.5 (5.8) 12.3 (7.6) 15.0 (9.4)
Open in a new tab

C, carbon.

Sensitivity of boreal lakes to climate

There are several potential human-induced drivers that could have impacted the rates of carbon burial over the last century, including observed increases to temperature in northern-forested biomes. Previous experimental results have suggested increasing temperature could decrease C burial in lakes17, yet our data show a negative correlation with latitude, (r2adj=0.20, F3,1356=117.2, P<0.001; Fig. 2a), which would in turn suggest a positive relationship with temperature. We explored this relationship further by comparing organic-C burial rates to mean annual temperature (MAT) across our data set (range: −3 to 7 °C MAT) and found a significant positive correlation of organic-C burial to MAT (r2adj=0.13, F3,1356=66.22, P<0.001; Fig. 2b) resulting in a slope of +1 g C m−2 per year per 1 °C MAT across all time periods. It would thus appear that, contrary to experimental results, at the ecosystem level temperature has a positive effect on organic-C burial. This relationship may reflect a direct effect of temperature, but most probably combines effects of other drivers that are themselves linked to temperature.

Figure 2. Geographic drivers of organic-C burial.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Organic-C burial rates for 101 northern lakes over a latitudinal (a) and temperature (b) gradient. The colour of the points represents three different time periods: before 1900 AD (orange), 1900–1950 AD (green) and 1950 to present day (blue). Solid lines represent least square regressions for each time period and dashed lines represent previously estimated Holocene burial rates for Finland2 (below; 2.7 g C m−2 per year) and Québec13 (above; 3.8 g C m−2 per year).

The observed average increase in organic-C burial of 5.5 g C m−2 per year since 1900 across all the lakes requires a comparable increase in temperature to have occurred over time for warming alone, to explain changes seen in these lakes. This is not the case, however, as the mean and maximum change in MAT for regions in this study is +0.8 and 1.0 °C since 1900. This indicates that, based on our regression model, temperature can only account for a maximum of 18% of the increase seen in organic-C burial. In addition, we found no significant correlation between the estimated contemporary change in burial and the corresponding change in MATs compiled from long-term (70–100 years) regional monitoring stations for the period of 1900–1950 or 1950 to present (Supplementary Fig. 1). Regional changes in temperature cannot fully explain the observed patterns in lake organic-C burial.

Discussion

Our revised rate of recent organic-C burial in northern lakes is still modest relative to annual anthropogenic C emissions (8 Pg C per year) and the net atmospheric C increase (2–4 Pg C per year)21, but it is nevertheless significant relative to other regional C components. For example, there are predictions of increasing greenhouse gas emissions from northern aquatic networks resulting from both direct temperature increases17 and indirectly through increases in the loading and subsequent remineralization of terrestrial organic matter to these surface waters22. The increase in lake organic-C burial, which will offset to some degree these shifts, needs to be considered in future scenarios of net regional C balances.

The most recent organic-C burial rates calculated here (15 g C m−2 per year) for northern lakes is still lower than those observed in culturally eutrophic lakes in North America and Europe (∼50–150 g C m−2 per year)9,11; however, this upshift will nevertheless have a large effect on calculations of organic-C buried by lakes globally because of the density of lake surfaces in northern landscapes. The boreal forest biome alone accounts for 28% of global freshwater lake area1,2, despite only covering 14% of the Earth's total land area23, meaning that even slight changes in rates will have a large impact at a global scale.

Lakes account for 10% to over 20% of the total area of northern forested ecosystems2,23,24 and estimates of lake density on the Earth's non-glaciated land surface has doubled in the last 20 years1,25,26. Furthermore, we continue to refine our understanding of how lakes process carbon over time and space, to improve global upscaling predictions27,28,29. Previous estimates of global-C processing by lakes used rates of organic-C burial in natural lakes averaged over 10,000 years2,27,28, whereas our results indicate a systematic elevation of burial rates over the last 100 years. This implies a significant underestimate of modern organic-C burial for northern lakes worldwide. Upscaling our post-1950 organic-C burial rates to the 2.4 million km2 of northern forest in North America23 yields an annual burial rate of 2.5–7.2 Tg C per year, 37% of which (0.9–2.5 Tg) would have been missed using average Holocene burial rates. If we further upscale this rate to a global estimate of the northern forested biome (14.2 million km2)2,23, the current burial rate for the ensemble of northern lakes would be on the order of 0.02–0.04 Pg C per year. This flux is of the same order of magnitude as the current estimates for organic-C burial for all the world's natural lakes combined (0.07 Pg C per year)28. By revising upwards previous organic-C burial derived from Holocene accumulation rates, we estimate 2.0–4.5 Pg of organic-C have been buried in sediments of northern lakes during the last 100 years, the period of greatest disruption of global biogeochemical cycles. This would account for 10 to 22% of total C stocks sequestered in northern lake sediments over the entire Holocene2.

Our results indicate that climate cannot fully explain this increased rate of organic-C burial observed over the Anthropocene and thus other large-scale human-induced landscape changes could be responsible10,11. Direct catchment impacts such as agriculture and human development are nearly non-existent in the catchments of the study lakes, and although logging has historically occurred in some regions it is generally less extensive compared with northern forests of Europe (for example, Scandanavia30). Although we cannot rule out some transfer of soil carbon into lakes as a result of logging, previous work has shown that even extensively logged catchments in this region have not shown a significant increase in carbon burial over non-forested catchments31. Beyond human manipulation of the landscape, there is a potential for changing fire patterns in the northern forests in response to changing climate. Whereas increasing catchment fire frequency could lead to decreased storage of organic-C in forest soils, and some loading of organic-C to lakes, shifts in fire patterns are asynchronous and variable across North America32.

Given the timing of increased organic-C burial and the absence of coinciding direct catchment disturbance, other processes operating at a continental or global scale must be influencing contemporary organic-C burial in northern lakes. One probable driver is the enhanced primary production of the forested catchment, stimulated by atmospheric deposition of anthropogenically derived reactive nitrogen (Nr). Nr deposition has increased by an order of magnitude globally since 1860 (ref. 18) and has been detectable via isotopic signatures in northern lake sediments and elevated nitrate concentrations in the Greenland Ice Sheet since the beginning of the twentieth century15,20. The timing of this increase in Nr deposition closely matches the rise in organic-C burial seen in these lakes (Fig. 1d), although this relationship is not entirely consistent through time.

Although such evidence is correlative, and thus does not demonstrate strictly causal links, the coherence in trends provides at least a preliminary mechanistic hypothesis. Long-term experimental studies in the boreal forest have shown that forest soil C sequestration increases and mineralization decreases in response to atmospheric Nr deposition33, leading to a larger pool of organic C that could be transported to lakes and these findings have been corroborated by process-based models developed to simulate forest production and soil sequestration over the last 100 years34. It is also possible that Nr deposition is leading to fertilization of the lakes themselves. Previous work has shown that Nr deposition may alter the nitrogen to phosphorus stoichiometry of northern lakes35,36 and distinct transitional zones among phytoplankton are evident as early as 1850 AD in arctic and alpine lakes37. The degree to which these changes in nutrient stoichiometry and phytoplankton composition cause or reflect increased organic-C burial in these lakes are unclear, but this provides a complementary mechanism from which Nr deposition could be driving the changes seen in this study. These conclusions are supported by the previous work of Kortelainen et al.38 who found that N and organic-C burial were strongly correlated in a randomly sampled set of boreal lakes in Finland. Such results imply that we need to consider how the carbon dynamics of aquatic systems could change under future patterns of atmospheric Nr deposition.

The trends in Nr deposition from the Greenland Ice Sheet vary over time in relation to organic-C burial in lakes, especially between 1910 and 1940 when Nr deposition appears relatively stable, while organic-C burial continues to increase. The two trends are somewhat reversed between 1930 and 1960 when Nr deposition again rises and organic-C burial levels off (Fig. 1d). This offset could indicate a time lag between Nr stimulation of terrestrial organic-C fixation and the subsequent transport of that carbon into aquatic systems. We should be careful, however, not to overinterpret divergence between Nr deposition derived from a single ice core and our data set of organic-C burial averaged over many lakes. Trends derived from a single site, such as the Greenland ice core, are likely to incorporate more stochastic variability that is smoothed out across our larger data set of the northern lakes.

In addition to changes in organic-C burial fuelled by Nr deposition over the last century, increasing export of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) from catchments has led to the observations of significant browning in northern lakes over the past 30 years39,40. These changes in DOC export to lakes have been attributed to increasing hydrologic runoff4 and reversal of landscape acidification in unbuffered systems following a reduction in sulphate deposition40. As this additional DOC may be sequestered in sediments by flocculation28, lakes in regions sensitive to brownification, such as the eastern Canadian Shield, may see even larger increases to organic-C burial.

Beyond the magnitude and regional significance of this contemporary organic-C burial in lakes, the recent shifts are probably significant from a functional landscape perspective. Lake organic-C burial is complex and necessarily integrates a number of key aquatic and terrestrial processes related to the production, transport and processing of organic C. It is clear from our data and results of other recent studies41 that temperature plays an important role in the spatial patterns of organic-C burial in lakes. Our data have shown, however, that a temporal increase in organic-C burial even greater than can be explained by warming has occurred over the last century. We have proposed atmospheric Nr deposition as one potential driver through the stimulation of forest soil C sequestration and lateral transfer of DOC through hydrologic pathways. Although the link between N fertilization and C sequestration has been intensively studied in the terrestrial literature33,34, we know relatively little about how this linkage is transferred to aquatic systems38. Further study is needed to corroborate our findings or propose alternative mechanisms, but it is clear that lakes are acting as sentinels and integrators of regional processes, and that these large-scale changes in lake organic-C burial are signalling major shifts in the overall biogeochemical functioning of northern landscapes.

Methods

Measuring organic-C burial from lake sediments

Organic-C burial rates in this study are a combination of newly collected and previously published data (see Supplementary Table 1 for a list of sources and citations) from northern forested lakes with minimal direct catchment disturbance. Sample size was limited to lakes sampled by the authors and previously published work where reliably dated sediment core records were available. Organic-C burial was estimated from sediment cores collected from the deep central basin of each lake42 and sectioned at 0.5- to 1-cm intervals. The percentage of organic C in each section was determined by loss on ignition43. Dry mass accumulation rates were calculated based on 210Pb, a naturally occurring radioisotope with a half-life of 22.3 years, following the constant rate of supply model44.

There are two factors that need addressing when using lake sediments to determine organic-C burial rates: (1) post-deposition mineralization and (2) sediment focusing. We have considered both of these issues in our methodological approach. First, previous work with repeated sediment coring has shown that over a period of 27 years, 87% of sedimentary C-loss happened within the first 5 years and older sediments lost <1% of sedimentary C per year45. Based on modelled decomposition rates in a boreal lake taken from the literature (see Supplementary Fig. 2), we excluded sediment younger than 10 years entirely from our analysis, to focus on time periods where post-depositional mineralization no longer accounts for a significant loss in C relative to organic-C burial rates. Second, as sediments are unevenly deposited across a lake bottom due to post-depositional horizontal transport, referred to as sediment focusing, site-specific burial rates for organic-C were corrected to a whole-basin rate using a focusing factor based on the observed versus expected atmospheric flux of 210Pb to the sediment9,10. Where measured atmospheric fluxes of 210Pb were not available, we assumed an average 210Pb flux of 100 Bq kg−1 per year per 1,000 mm of precipitation46, with annual precipitation derived from the world climate data interpolation at 1-km spatial resolution47 (WORLDCLIM; www.worldclim.org). Mean annual temperature for each site was also taken from the WORLDCLIM database at the same resolution. For site-specific observed temperature change, the closest weather station with long-term (50 to 100+ years) data available was selected from the Global Historical Climatology Network, version 3 (www.ncdc.noaa.gov/ghcnm/v3.php). From these data, temporal changes in MAT for the various lake regions were modelled using a locally weighted, polynomial-regression (LOWESS) smoother48. Changes in MAT (ΔMAT) were calculated as the difference in MAT averaged over the same time periods as carbon burial (see below). Long-term trends in MAT for each regional subset are shown in Supplementary Fig. 3.

Data treatment

Organic-C burial rates were separated into three time periods based on global anthropogenic activity before and after the beginning of the Anthropocene: Pre-1900, 1900–1950, 1950–2000 (ref. 16). Pre-1900 was considered background or very low disturbance in North America, as well as limited global atmospheric emissions. The period 1900–1950 was considered a transitory period with increasing human population and industrialization. The period 1950 to present was considered the modern period and reflective of the post-World War II increase in both the human population and industrialization. Statistical comparisons for significant increases between periods were made using one-sided paired t-tests for a difference in organic-C burial greater than zero.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Heathcote, A. J. et al. Large increases in carbon burial in northern lakes during the Anthropocene. Nat. Commun. 6:10016 doi: 10.1038/ncomms10016 (2015).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1-3, Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary References.

ncomms10016-s1.pdf (700.5KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We thank Kathleen Laird, Derek Muir and Marie-Eve Ferland for sharing previously published sediment core data. This project was part of the large-scale research programme of the Industrial Research Chair in Carbon Biogeochemistry in Boreal Aquatic Systems (CarBBAS), co-funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and Hydro-Québec to PdG, and also supported by NSERC funding to Y.T.P., N.J.A. acknowledges the support of a Royal Society (London) Wolfson Merit award.

Footnotes

Author contributions A.J.H. and N.J.A. conceived and designed the study. A.J.H., D.R.E. and N.J.A. processed and analysed the data. P.A.d.G., Y.T.P., N.J.A., A.J.H. and D.R.E. contributed data and support. A.J.H. wrote the manuscript as lead author with significant contributions by all co-authors.

References

  1. Verpoorter C., Kutser T., Seekell D. A. & Tranvik L. J. A global inventory of lakes based on high-resolution satellite imagery. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 1–7 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  2. Kortelainen P., Pajunen H., Ranktakari M. & Saarnisto M. A large carbon pool and small sink in boreal Holocene lake sediments. Glob. Chang. Biol. 10, 1648–1653 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  3. Molot L. A. & Dillon P. J. Storage of terrestrial carbon in boreal lake sediments and evasion to the atmosphere. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 10, 483–492 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  4. Benoy G., Cash K., McCauley E. & Wrona F. Carbon dynamics in lakes of the boreal forest under a changing climate. Environ. Rev. 15, 175–189 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  5. Anas M. U. M., Scott K. A. & Wissel B. Carbon budgets of boreal lakes: state of knowledge, challenges and implications. Environ. Rev 23, 275–287 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  6. Ferland M.-E., Prairie Y. T., Teodoru C. & del Giorgio P. A. Linking organic carbon sedimentation, burial efficiency, and long-term accumulation in boreal lakes. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosciences 119, 836–847 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  7. Bhatti J. S. et al. in Towards Sustainable Management of the Boreal Forest eds Burton P. J., Messier C., Smith D. W., Adamowicz W. L. 799–855NRC Research Press (2003). [Google Scholar]
  8. Algesten G. et al. Role of lakes for organic carbon cycling in the boreal zone. Global Change Biol. 10, 141–147 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  9. Anderson N. J., Bennion H. & Lotter A. F. Lake eutrophication and its implications for organic carbon sequestration in Europe. Global Change Biol. 20, 2741–2751 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Anderson N. J., Dietz R. D. & Engstrom D. R. Land-use change, not climate, controls organic carbon burial in lakes. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 280, 20131278 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Heathcote A. J. & Downing J. A. Impacts of eutrophication on carbon burial in freshwater lakes in an intensively agricultural landscape. Ecosystems 15, 60–70 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  12. Einsele G., Yan J. & Hinderer M. Atmospheric carbon burial in modern lake basins and its significance for the global carbon budget. Global Planet. Change 30, 167–195 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  13. Ferland M.-E., del Giorgio P. A., Teodoru C. R. & Prairie Y. T. Long-term C accumulation and total C stocks in boreal lakes in northern Québec. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 26, GB0E04 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  14. Anthony K. M. W. et al. A shift of thermokarst lakes from carbon sources to sinks during the Holocene epoch. Nature 511, 452–456 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Holtgrieve G. W. et al. A coherent signature of anthropogenic nitrogen deposition to remote watersheds of the Northern Hemisphere. Science 334, 1545–1548 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Steffen W., Crutzen P. J. & McNeill J. R. The Anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature? Ambio 36, 614–621 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gudasz C. et al. Temperature-controlled organic carbon mineralization in lake sediments. Nature 466, 478–481 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Galloway J. N. et al. Nitrogen cycles: past, present, and future. Biogeochemistry 70, 153–226 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  19. Sobek S. et al. Organic carbon burial efficiency in lake sediments controlled by oxygen exposure time and sediment source. Limonol. Oceanogr. 54, 2243–2254 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  20. Hastings M. G., Jarvis J. C. & Steig E. J. Anthropogenic impacts on nitrogen isotopes of ice-core nitrate. Science 324, 1288 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. IPCC. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contributions of Working Group I to the Fiftth Assessment Report of the Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change Cambridge Univ. Press (2013). [Google Scholar]
  22. Lapierre J. -F. & del Giorgio P. A. Geographical and environmental drivers of regional differences in the lake pCO2 versus DOC relationship across northern landscapes. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosciences 117, G03015 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  23. Myneni R. B. et al. A large carbon sink in the woody biomass of Northern forests. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 14784–14789 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Heathcote A. J., Giorgio P. A. & Prairie Y. T. Predicting bathymetric features of lakes from the topography of their surrounding landscape. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 72, 1–8 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  25. McDonald C. P., Rover J. A., Stets E. G. & Striegl R. G. The regional abundance and size distribution of lakes and reservoirs in the United States and implications for estimates of global lake extent. Limnol. Oceanogr. 57, 597–606 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  26. Downing J. A. & Duarte C. M. in Lake Ecosystem Ecology: A Global Perspective ed. Likens G. E. 220–229Academic Press (2009). [Google Scholar]
  27. Cole J. J. et al. Plumbing the global carbon cycle: integrating inland waters into the terrestrial carbon budget. Ecosystems 10, 171–184 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  28. Tranvik L. J. et al. Lakes and reservoirs as regulators of carbon cycling and climate. Limnol. Oceanogr. 54, 2298–2314 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  29. Raymond P. A. et al. Global carbon dioxide emissions from inland waters. Nature 503, 355–359 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Östlund L., Zackrisson O. & Axelsson A.-L. The history and transformation of a Scandinavian boreal forest landscape since the 19th century. Can. J. For. Res. 27, 1198–1206 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  31. Laird K. & Cumming B. A regional paleolimnological assessment of the impact of clear-cutting on lakes from the central interior of British Columbia. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58, 492–505 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  32. Flannigan M. et al. Future fire in Canada's boreal forest: paleoecology results and general circulation model—regional climate model simulations. Can. J. For. Res. 31, 854–864 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  33. Maaroufi N. I. et al. Anthropogenic nitrogen deposition enhances carbon sequestration in boreal soils. Global Change Biol. 21, 3169–3180 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. De Vries W. & Posch M. Modelling the impact of nitrogen deposition, climate change and nutrient limitations on tree carbon sequestration in Europe for the period 1900–2050. Environ. Pollut. 159, 2289–2299 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Elser J. J. et al. Shifts in lake N: P stoichiometry and nutrient limitation driven by atmospheric nitrogen deposition. Science 326, 835–837 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Bergström A. K. & Jansson M. Atmospheric nitrogen deposition has caused nitrogen enrichment and eutrophication of lakes in the northern hemisphere. Global Change Biol. 12, 635–643 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  37. Wolfe A. P. et al. Stratigraphic expressions of the Holocene-Anthropocene transition revealed in sediments from remote lakes. Earth Sci. Rev. 116, 17–34 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  38. Kortelainen P. et al. Carbon evasion/accumulation ratio in boreal lakes is linked to nitrogen. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 27, 363–374 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  39. Roulet N. & Moore T. R. Browning the waters. Nature 444, 283–284 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Monteith D. T. et al. Dissolved organic carbon trends resulting from changes in atmospheric deposition chemistry. Nature 450, 537–540 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Clow D. W. et al. Organic carbon burial in lakes and reservoirs of the conterminous United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 7614–7622 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Anderson N. J., D'Andrea W. & Fritz S. C. Holocene carbon burial by lakes in SW Greenland. Global Change Biol. 15, 2590–2598 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  43. Dean W. E. Jr Determination of carbonate and organic matter in calcareous sediments and sedimentary rocks by loss on ignition: comparison with other methods. J. Sediment. Petrol 44, 242–248 (1974). [Google Scholar]
  44. Appleby P. G. & Oldfield F. The calculation of Lead-210 dates assuming a constant rate of supple of unsupported 210Pb to the sediment. Catena 5, 1–8 (1978). [Google Scholar]
  45. Gälman V., Rydberg J., Sjöstedt de-Luna S., Bindler R. & Renberg I. Carbon and nitrogen loss rates during aging of lake sediment: changes over 27 years studied in varved lake sediment. Limnol. Oceanogr. 53, 1076–1082 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  46. Appleby P. G. in Tracking Environmental Change Using Lake Sediments: Basin Analysis, Coring, and Chronological Techniques eds Last W. M., Smol J. P. 171–203Springer (2001). [Google Scholar]
  47. Hijmans R. J., Cameron S. E., Parra J. L., Jones P. G. & Jarvis A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25, 1965–1978 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  48. Cleveland W., Grosse E. & Shyu W. in Statistical Models in S eds Chambers J. M., Hastie T. J. 309–376Chapman & Hall (1992). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1-3, Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary References.

ncomms10016-s1.pdf (700.5KB, pdf)

Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES