Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Theory Comput. 2005 Jul;1(4):561–565. doi: 10.1021/ct050067i

Stabilization of Cylindrical N12 and N18 by Phosphorus Substitution

Douglas L Strout 1
PMCID: PMC4674835  NIHMSID: NIHMS60505  PMID: 26641676

Abstract

Molecules consisting entirely or predominantly of nitrogen are the subject of much research for their potential as high energy density materials (HEDM). The problem with many such HEDM candidates is their instability with respect to dissociation. For example, a low-energy dissociation path has been shown for a cylindrical cage isomer of N12. The instability is at least partially due to the ease of ring opening at triangles on either end of the molecule. In the current study, nitrogen cage molecules are examined to determine the stabilizing effect of substituting the triangle nitrogens with an element that more naturally forms triangles, namely phosphorus, which is valence isoelectronic with nitrogen. The cylindrical N12, and a larger analogue N18, form the structural basis for cage molecules of N6P6 and N12P6. Theoretical calculations using Hartree-Fock theory and perturbation theory (MP2 and MP4), along with the correlation-consistent basis sets of Dunning, have been carried out to determine dissociation energies along various pathways. The energies are discussed in terms of low-energy dissociation and the ability of the molecules to resist dissociation.

Introduction

Nitrogen molecules have been the subjects of many recent studies because of their potential as high energy density materials (HEDM). An all-nitrogen molecule Nx can undergo the reaction Nx ➔ (x/2) N2, a reaction that can be exothermic by 50 kcal/mol or more per nitrogen atom1,2. To be a practical energy source, however, a molecule Nx would have to resist dissociation well enough to be a stable fuel. Theoretical studies37 have shown that numerous Nx molecules are not sufficiently stable to be practical HEDM, including cyclic and acyclic isomers with eight to twelve atoms. Cage isomers of N8 and N12 have also been shown710 by theoretical calculations to be unstable. Experimental progress in the synthesis of nitrogen molecules has been very encouraging, with the N5+ and N5 ions having been recently produced11,12 in the laboratory. More recently, a network polymer of nitrogen has been produced13 under very high pressure conditions. Experimental successes have sparked theoretical studies14,15 on other potential all-nitrogen molecules. More recent developments include the experimental synthesis of high energy molecules consisting predominantly of nitrogen, including azides16,17 of various heteroatoms and polyazido isomers18 of compounds such as 1,3,5-triazine. Future developments in experiment and theory will further broaden the horizons of high energy nitrogen research.

The stability properties of Nx molecules have also been extensively studied in a computational survey19 of various structural forms with up to 20 atoms. Cyclic, acyclic, and cage isomers have been examined to determine the bonding properties and energetics over a wide range of molecules. A more recent computational study20 of cage isomers of N12 examined the specific structural features that lead to the most stable molecules among the three-coordinate nitrogen cages. Those results showed that molecules with the most pentagons in the nitrogen network tend to be the most stable, with a secondary stabilizing effect due to triangles in the cage structure. A recent study21 of larger nitrogen molecules N24, N30, and N36 showed significant deviations from the pentagon-favoring trend. Each of these molecule sizes has fullerene-like cages consisting solely of pentagons and hexagons, but a large stability advantage was found for molecules with fewer pentagons, more triangles, and an overall structure more cylindrical than spheroidal. Studies22,23 of intermediate-sized molecules N14, N16, and N18 also showed that the cage isomer with the most pentagons was not the most stable cage, even when compared to isomer(s) containing triangles (which have 60° angles that should have significant angle strain). For each of these molecule sizes, spheroidally-shaped molecules proved to be less stable than elongated, cylindrical ones.

However, in terms of absolute stability with respect to dissociation processes, even the most stable N12 (see Figure 1) has been shown7 to have a low-energy path to dissociation. The low-energy dissociation involves the opening of the triangles on each end of the molecule. Nitrogen-nitrogen single bonds become double bonds, which are energetically very favorable compared to single bonds, and become triple bonds (yielding isolated N2 molecules, the ultimate product of the dissociation processes). In the current study, nitrogen atoms in the triangles are substituted by phosphorus, an element that more naturally forms stable triangles24 and is valence isoelectronic with nitrogen. This substitution is made on the most stable N12 and an analogous N18 cage (shown in Figure 2). The resulting molecules have molecular formulas of N6P6 and N12P6 and are illustrated in Figures 3 and 4, respectively. The issue to be examined in this study is whether the nitrogen-phosphorus molecules are stable enough to be good candidates for HEDM.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Cage isomer of N12 (designated 2060, ref. 20). This is the most stable cage isomer of N12.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Cage isomer of N18 (designated 2063A, ref. 22). This is the most stable cage isomer of N18.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

N6P6 molecule, with nitrogen atoms in white and phosphorus atoms in black. The molecule has D3d point group symmetry, and symmetry-independent bonds have been labeled.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

N12P6 molecule, with nitrogen atoms in white and phosphorus atoms in black. The molecule has D3h point group symmetry, and symmetry-independent bonds have been labeled.

Computational Methods

Geometry optimizations are carried out using Hartree-Fock (HF) theory and perturbation theory25 (MP2). Single energy points are calculated with fourth-order perturbation theory25 (MP4(SDQ)). Single energy points for N6P6 have also been calculated with coupled-cluster theory26 (CCSD(T)). Vibrational frequencies and zero- point energies (ZPE) have been calculated for N6P6 with MP2 theory. Geometries and energies of the intact molecules are calculated in the singlet state, while dissociation intermediates, which have one broken bond, are calculated in the triplet state. The basis sets are the polarized valence double-zeta (cc-pVDZ) and augmented polarized valence double-zeta (aug-cc-pVDZ) sets of Dunning.27 The Gaussian 03 computational chemistry software package28 is used for all calculations in this work.

Results and Discussion

The N6P6 molecule has D3d point group symmetry and has only three symmetry- independent bonds, marked on Figure 3 as PP, PN, and NN, denoting the phosphorus- phosphorus, phosphorus-nitrogen, and nitrogen-nitrogen bonds, respectively. Breaking any of these bonds results in a dissociation intermediate whose ground electronic state is a triplet. HOMO-LUMO gaps of the intact molecules and all dissociation intermediates are sufficiently large that there are no other low-lying states, and therefore the use of single-reference methods in this study is justified. The calculated energies of dissociation for each of the three bonds are shown in Table 1; each dissociation energy is the energy difference between the intact molecule and the corresponding dissociation intermediate. The Hartree-Fock numbers are consistently low, with a strong upward correction from MP2 and a moderate lowering effect from MP4. Coupled-cluster theory (CCSD(T)) bond dissociation energies for N6P6 are within a few kcal/mol of the MP4 results. Vibrational frequencies with MP2 theory confirm that the N6P6 and all of its dissociation intermediates are local minima, and the zero-point corrections to the MP2/cc-pVDZ energies are about 1 kcal/mol. Basis set effects are minimal and tend toward a very slight increase in dissociation energy as the basis set increases.

TABLE 1.

Dissociation energies for each of the symmetry-independent bonds in the N6P6 molecule (energies in kcal/mol). Zero-point energies (ZPE) have been calculated at the MP2/cc-pVDZ level of theory.

Symmetry-independent bonds (Figure 3)
Method / Basis Set PP PN NN
HF / cc-pVDZ +26.6 +42.9 +9.5
MP2 / cc-pVDZ +53.9 +68.6 +45.3
MP2 (+ ZPE) / cc-pVDZ +53.3 +67.5 +44.5
HF / aug-cc-pVDZ +26.4 +42.6 +10.2
MP2 / aug-cc-pVDZ +54.4 +70.8 +47.2
MP4 / cc-pVDZ // MP2 / cc-pVDZ +46.7 +61.1 +34.6
CCSD(T) / cc-pVDZ // MP2 / cc-pVDZ +47.4 +56.2 +32.1

The data suggest that the weakest bond in the molecule is the NN bond; this bond has the lowest dissociation energy at all levels of theory. However, even this bond has dissociation energy over 30 kcal/mol, which implies that this molecule is stable and could be a viable HEDM. Breaking a bond anywhere in the molecule requires the input of a substantial amount of energy, but what about a concerted dissociation process whereby two or more bonds break simultaneously? Such a process is most likely to proceed at low energy if it leads to the creation of an N=N double bond, because an N=N double bond is an energetically favorable step toward the creation of free N2. The N6P6 has only one pathway whereby the breaking of two bonds leads to an N=N double bond. If two PN bonds are broken such that the two nitrogen atoms are bonded to each other, the two nitrogen atoms will form a double bond. The intermediate with the double bond has a triplet ground state, and its energies are shown in Table 2. The energies are lower than for breaking one PN bond, which is due to the stabilizing effect of the N=N double bond, but the energies are still above 40 kcal/mol. The two-bond-breaking pathway is also a high energy dissociation route for the molecule.

TABLE 2.

Energies (relative to the N6P6 molecule) of an intermediate with two PN bonds broken to produce an N=N double bond (energies in kcal/mol calculated with cc-pVDZ basis set).

HF MP2 MP4//MP2
Energy of breaking two PN bonds +38.3 +61.5 +44.7

N6P6 is a stable molecule, but the loss of half of the nitrogen atoms (relative to N12) would result in a drastic loss of energy production from the molecule. The reaction N6P6 ➔ 3 N2 + (3/2) P4 would be a great deal less exothermic than N12 ➔ 6 N2. This loss of energy release power is quantified in Table 3. In designing a practical HEDM, maximizing the nitrogen content is a desirable goal. For that reason, calculations are carried out on the N12P6 molecule shown in Figure 4. Its structure is based on the N18 shown in Figure 2, with phosphorus substitution similar to the N6P6. This molecule has D3h point group symmetry and four symmetry-independent bonds, which are labeled in Figure 4. Two of the bonds are nitrogen-nitrogen and are labeled NN1 and NN2. Dissociation energies for each of the four bonds are shown in Table 4.

TABLE 3.

Energy releases for N12 and N18, and the phosphorus-substituted analogues (calculated at MP2/cc-pVDZ level of theory).

Molecule Reaction kJ/mol kJ/g
N12 N12 ➔ 6 N2 2225 13.2
N18 N18 ➔ 9 N2 3449 13.7
N6P6 N6P6 ➔ 3 N2 + (3/2) P4 907 3.4
N12P6 N12P6 ➔ 6 N2 + (3/2) P4 2069 5.8

TABLE 4.

Dissociation energies for each of the symmetry-independent bonds in the N12P6 molecule (energies in kcal/mol).

Symmetry-independent bonds (Figure 4)
Method / Basis Set PP PN NN1 NN2
HF / cc-pVDZ +27.5 +41.4 +2.4 +41.8
MP2 / cc-pVDZ +55.4 +67.9 +34.7 +58.0
MP4 / cc-pVDZ // MP2 / cc-pVDZ +48.1 +59.6 +25.1 +62.1

The N12P6 molecule is less stable than its N6P6 counterpart, due to lesser stability in the NN1 bond. The NN1 bond is the “weakest link” in the N12P6, with a dissociation energy of 25.1 kcal/mol at the MP4/cc-pVDZ level of theory, compared with the 34.6 kcal/mol dissociation energy of the NN bond of N6P6. This is an effect that has been previously shown29 for hexagonal nitrogen tubes, namely a weakening in N-N bonds with increasing length of a nitrogen tube. Further lengthening of the tube to create N18P6, N24P6, etc., by incorporating additional hexagonal “layers” of nitrogen is similarly unlikely to result in strengthening of the molecule. Rather the opposite, not only in the weakening of individual nitrogen-nitrogen bonds, but also in the proliferation of multiple-bond-breaking pathways that could expose an N=N double-bonded pair. Even one such low-energy pathway would render the molecule unstable with respect to dissociation. The N12P6 may be more stable than its N18 analogue, but the viability of N12P6 as a stable HEDM is questionable.

Conclusion

Nitrogen cages previously shown to be unstable with respect to dissociation can be stabilized with the substitution of appropriate atoms such as phosphorus. Such substitutions can lead to small molecules that are feasible as high energy density materials. It seems, however, that two limitations exist in the utility of phosphorus as a heteroatom: (1) phosphorus substitution on the triangular end-caps does not solve the problem of weakness in the interior of a lengthening nitrogen tube, and (2) the high mass and low energy release properties of phosphorus dilute the energy release properties of the HEDM. While tradeoffs between stability and energy release may be inevitable in HEDM design, other heteroatoms may provide stability with less loss of power. If, in fact, the goal of a 100% nitrogen HEDM is unattainable, then further heteroatom studies will be required to find the optimum balance between stability and energy production.

Acknowledgments

The Alabama Supercomputer Authority is gratefully acknowledged for a grant of computer time on the SGI Altix operated in Huntsville, AL. This work is also supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH/NCMHD grant 1P20MD000547-01). This work was partially supported by the National Computational Science Alliance under grant number CHE030041 and utilized the IBM p690 cluster in Champaign, Illinois. The taxpayers of the state of Alabama in particular and the United States in general are also gratefully acknowledged.

References

  • 1.Fau S, Bartlett RJ. J Phys Chem A. 2001;105:4096. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tian A, Ding F, Zhang L, Xie Y, Schaefer HF., III J Phys Chem A. 1997;101:1946. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chung G, Schmidt MW, Gordon MS. J Phys Chem A. 2000;104:5647. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Strout DL. J Phys Chem A. 2002;106:816. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Thompson MD, Bledson TM, Strout DL. J Phys Chem A. 2002;106:6880. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Li QS, Liu YD. Chem Phys Lett. 2002;353:204. [Google Scholar]; Li QS, Qu H, Zhu HS. Chin Sci Bull. 1996;41:1184. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Li QS, Zhao JF. J Phys Chem A. 2002;106:5367. [Google Scholar]; Qu H, Li QS, Zhu HS. Chin Sci Bull. 1997;42:462. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gagliardi L, Evangelisti S, Widmark PO, Roos BO. Theor Chem Acc. 1997;97:136. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gagliardi L, Evangelisti S, Bernhardsson A, Lindh R, Roos BO. Int J Quantum Chem. 2000;77:311. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schmidt MW, Gordon MS, Boatz JA. Int J Quantum Chem. 2000;76:434. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Christe KO, Wilson WW, Sheehy JA, Boatz JA. Angew Chem Int Ed. 1999;38:2004. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19990712)38:13/14<2004::AID-ANIE2004>3.0.CO;2-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Vij A, Pavlovich JG, Wilson WW, Vij V, Christe KO. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2002;41:3051. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20020816)41:16<3051::AID-ANIE3051>3.0.CO;2-T. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Butler RN, Stephens JC, Burke LA. Chem Commun. 2003;8:1016. doi: 10.1039/b301491f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Eremets MI, Gavriliuk AG, Trojan IA, Dzivenko DA, Boehler R. Nature Materials. 2004;3:558. doi: 10.1038/nmat1146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fau S, Bartlett RJ. J Phys Chem A. 2001;105:4096. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fau S, Wilson KJ, Bartlett RJ. J Phys Chem A. 2002;106:4639. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Knapp C, Passmore J. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2004;43:4834. doi: 10.1002/anie.200401748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Haiges R, Schneider S, Schroer T, Christe KO. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2004;43:4919. doi: 10.1002/anie.200454242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Huynh MV, Hiskey MA, Hartline EL, Montoya DP, Gilardi R. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2004;43:4924. doi: 10.1002/anie.200460366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Glukhovtsev MN, Jiao H, Schleyer PvR. Inorg Chem. 1996;35:7124. doi: 10.1021/ic9606237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bruney LY, Bledson TM, Strout DL. Inorg Chem. 2003;42:8117. doi: 10.1021/ic034696j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Strout DL. J Phys Chem A. 2004;108:2555. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sturdivant SE, Nelson FA, Strout DL. J Phys Chem A. 2004;108:7087. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Strout DL. J Phys Chem A. 2004;108:10911. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.White phosphorus (P4) consists of tetrahedral molecules, which have triangular faces. See Chang R. Chemistry. 8. New York: McGraw-Hill; p. 886.
  • 25.Moller C, Plesset MS. Phys Rev. 1934;46:618. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Purvis GD, Bartlett RJ. J Chem Phys. 1982;76:1910. [Google Scholar]; Scuseria GE, Janssen CL, Schaefer HF., III J Chem Phys. 1988;89:7382. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dunning TH., Jr J Chem Phys. 1989;90:1007. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Montgomery JA, Jr, Vreven T, Kudin KN, Burant JC, Millam JM, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Barone V, Mennucci B, Cossi M, Scalmani G, Rega N, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Klene M, Li X, Knox JE, Hratchian HP, Cross JB, Adamo C, Jaramillo J, Gomperts R, Stratmann RE, Yazyev O, Austin AJ, Cammi R, Pomelli C, Ochterski JW, Ayala PY, Morokuma K, Voth GA, Salvador P, Dannenberg JJ, Zakrzewski VG, Dapprich S, Daniels AD, Strain MC, Farkas O, Malick DK, Rabuck AD, Raghavachari K, Foresman JB, Ortiz JV, Cui Q, Baboul AG, Clifford S, Cioslowski J, Stefanov BB, Liu G, Liashenko A, Piskorz P, Komaromi I, Martin RL, Fox DJ, Keith T, Al-Laham MA, Peng CY, Nanayakkara A, Challacombe M, Gill PMW, Johnson B, Chen W, Wong MW, Gonzalez C, Pople JA. Gaussian 03, Revision B.01. Gaussian, Inc; Pittsburgh PA: 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sturdivant SE, Strout DL. J Phys Chem A. 2004;108:4773. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES