Abstract
MicroRNAs (miRNAs, micro ribonucleic acids) are pivotal post-transcriptional regulators of gene expression. These endogenous small non-coding RNAs play significant roles in tumorigenesis and tumor progression. miR-142-3p expression is dysregulated in several breast cancer subtypes. We aimed at investigating the role of miR-142-3p in breast cancer cell invasiveness. Supported by transcriptomic Affymetrix array analysis and confirmatory investigations at the mRNA and protein level, we demonstrate that overexpression of miR-142-3p in MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468 and MCF-7 breast cancer cells leads to downregulation of WASL (Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome-like, protein: N-WASP), Integrin-αV, RAC1, and CFL2, molecules implicated in cytoskeletal regulation and cell motility. ROCK2, IL6ST, KLF4, PGRMC2 and ADCY9 were identified as additional targets in a subset of cell lines. Decreased Matrigel invasiveness was associated with the miR-142-3p-induced expression changes. Confocal immunofluorescence microscopy, nanoscale atomic force microscopy and digital holographic microscopy revealed a change in cell morphology as well as a reduced cell volume and size. A more cortical actin distribution and a loss of membrane protrusions were observed in cells overexpressing miR-142-3p. Luciferase activation assays confirmed direct miR-142-3p-dependent regulation of the 3’-untranslated region of ITGAV and WASL. siRNA-mediated depletion of ITGAV and WASL resulted in a significant reduction of cellular invasiveness, highlighting the contribution of these factors to the miRNA-dependent invasion phenotype. While knockdown of WASL significantly reduced the number of membrane protrusions compared to controls, knockdown of ITGAV resulted in a decreased cell volume, indicating differential contributions of these factors to the miR-142-3p-induced phenotype. Our data identify WASL, ITGAV and several additional cytoskeleton-associated molecules as novel invasion-promoting targets of miR-142-3p in breast cancer.
Introduction
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are endogenous small non-coding RNAs comprised of approximately 19–25 nucleotides. Primary miRNA transcripts are cleaved by the RNase enzyme complex Drosha-DGCR8 in the nucleus and subsequently by the action of the cytoplasmic RNase III Dicer1 [1–3]. One miRNA duplex strand is degraded while the other strand is incorporated into the microRNA ribonucleoprotein complex which binds to partially complementary target sites in the 3’-untranslated region (3’UTR) of target mRNAs. Depending on the degree of complementarity, expression of the encoded protein is either repressed translationally or its mRNA is degraded [3,4]. miRNAs have emerged as regulators of gene expression in critical cellular processes such as differentiation, apoptosis and stem cell renewal [2, 3]. In breast cancer, dysregulated miRNA expression is associated with tumor occurrence, progression and metastasis [5–10]. miR-142-3p is dysregulated in clinical samples of breast cancer and breast cancer cell lines relative to normal breast tissue [8,11]. The functional role of miR-142-3p in breast cancer cells has not been elucidated, yet. However, miR-142-3p-dependent functions have been identified in hematopoiesis [12], the immune system [13] and in relation with hemato-oncological diseases [14]. Aberrant expression or function of miR-142-3p has been noted in several additional forms of cancer, including clear-cell kidney cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, colon cancer and thyroid cancer [15–18]. In this study, we aimed at investigating a potential role for miR-142-3p in the regulation of breast cancer invasiveness in vitro. We demonstrate that upregulated miR-142-3p expression levels in a panel of human breast cancer cell lines leads to inhibition of Integrin-αV, a transmembrane receptor subunit implicated in matrix-dependent regulation of cell adhesion and motility [19–21]. Furthermore, expression of several additional factors related to cytoskeletal function, such as WASL (N-WASP), CFL2, RAC1 and ROCK2, is reduced following miR-142-3p overexpression. As a consequence of targeting these molecules, miR-142-3p reduces the formation of membrane protrusions and pronounced changes in cell shape and size, ultimately resulting in a significant inhibition of breast cancer cell invasiveness. Our data suggest a novel fundamental posttranscriptional mechanism of cell motility regulation by miR-142-3p, with translational implications for breast cancer pathogenesis and therapy.
Materials and Methods
Materials
Media and fetal calf serum supplies were from PAA (Pasching, Germany). Tissue culture supplied from Gibco BRL (Karlsruhe, Germany). Unless stated otherwise, all chemicals were from Sigma (Deisenhofen, Germany).
Cell culture and microRNA transfection
The human breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468 and MCF-7 were purchased from ATCC / LGC Standards (Wesel, Germany) [22]. Cell line authenticity was confirmed by STR analysis. Cells were grown to 70% confluency in 6-well-plates and transiently transfected using Dharmafect reagent (Dharmacon, Lafayette, CO, USA) and 10 nM negative control miRNA #1, miR-142-3p precursor, or 20 nM antimiR-142-3p (all from ABI, Darmstadt, Germany), respectively [8,9]. Functional analyses were performed 72h after transfection. Normal human skin fibroblasts have been previously described [23].
RNA isolation and reverse transcription
microRNA and mRNA isolation from cultured cells were both performed using the innuPREP RNA Mini Kit (Analytik Jena AG, Jena, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. MicroRNA was converted into cDNA using the TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transkription kit (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, USA). Reverse transcription of mRNA was performed using the First strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Fermentas GmbH, St Leon Rot, Germany).
Cell proliferation assay
MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay was carried out for 24 h as previously described [9,10]. 72 h after microRNA precursor transfection, 10,000 MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468 and MCF-7 cells were seeded in 96-well plates and cultured for 24 h, followed by 24 h incubation in the presence of MTT, lysis and optical density measurement at 595 nm in a microplate reader.
Cell size measurement
The two-dimensional size [μm2] of transfected MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 cells was measured using phase contrast microscopy and Zeiss AxioVision 4.3 (Zeiss, Jena, Germany) imaging software.
Cell volume and dry mass determination with digital holographic microscopy (DHM)
Digital off-axis holograms of suspended transfected MDA-MB-468 cells and control cells in DMEM with an osmolality of 320 mOsmol/kg were recorded with a previously described setup [24]. The cell volume (V) was determined from numerically reconstructed quantitative digital holographic microscopy phase images of selected suspended single cells with spherical appearance as previously reported [24,25]. The dry mass was determined as previously described [26].
Quantitative TaqMan real-time PCR analysis
The indicated cell lines were transfected with a control miR precursor, a miR-142-3p precursor followed by mRNA isolation, cDNA preparation and qPCR (quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction) [9, 10]. All TaqMan probes were purchased from Applied Biosystems, normalizing to 18S rRNA expression. Data were calculated and expressed as fold change vs control transfected cells using the 2-ΔΔCt method.
Affymetrix transcriptomic analysis
RNA concentration and purity were measured using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). RNA integrity was checked with an Agilent Bioanalyzer (software version B.02.07.SI532) on a RNA Nano Chip (both Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). Affymetrix GeneChip Human Gene 1.0 ST microarrays (Affymetrix UK Ltd., High Wycombe, UK) were performed using the manufacturers´ protocols. The samples were amplified from 100 ng of total RNA in accordance with the Ambion WT Expression assay kit (LifeTechnologies GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) and fragmented and end-labeled in accordance with the Affymetrix GeneChip WT Terminal Labeling protocol. The prepared targets were hybridized overnight to Affymetrix GeneChip Human Gene 1.0 ST arrays. Following hybridization, the arrays were washed and stained using the Affymetrix GeneChip Fluidics Station 450 and scanned using the Affymetrix GeneChip Scanner 3000 7G. Statistical analyses of microarray data were performed using the Partek Genomics Suite software (Partek Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA). CEL-files (containing raw expression measurements) were imported to Partek GS. The robust multi-array average (RMA) algorithm was used for normalization. The array data were quantile normalized and log-2 transformed. For each probe, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed: Y ij = μ + Type i + Ɛ ij, where Yij represents the jth observation on the ith Type. μ is the common effect for the whole experiment and εij represents the random error present in the jth observation on the ith Type. The errors Ɛij are assumed to be normally and independently distributed with mean 0 and standard deviation δ for all measurements. For each probe, a student t-test was applied to statistically compare the difference between the means of the groups´ “1423” and “chl” expression measurements. A p-value ≤0.05 was used as a threshold for significance. These data are available through the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), accession number GSE50829.
Luciferase assays
MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468 and MCF-7 breast cancer cells were transfected with plasmid pEZX-MT01-N-WASP-3’UTR expressing firefly luciferase (hLuc) under the control of an SV40 enhancer and the 3’UTR of human ITGAV, and renilla luciferase (hRLuc) under constitutive control of the cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter (HmiT055211, GeneCopoeia). An analogous construct was used to investigate regulation of WASL (HmiT021768, GeneCopoeia, Rockville, MD, USA). Cells were co-transfected with a control miR precursor or pre-miR-142-3p and simultaneously assayed for activity of both luciferases 72h after transfection [9,10].
Western Blotting
Extracts of cells transfected with control precursor miR, miR-142-3p or anti-miR-142-3p were analyzed by western-blotting using specific rabbit antibodies against integrin αV, N-WASP (Cell Signaling, Frankfurt a.M., Germany, 1:1,000) and appropriate peroxidase-labeled secondary antibodies (Calbiochem, Darmstadt, Germany, 1:1,000) as previously described [9,10]. Stripped blot membranes were reprobed with mouse-anti-tubulin antibodies (Sigma, Munich, Germany, 1:4,000) and appropriate secondary antibodies as a loading control (N = 3). In addition, extracts of non-transfected MDA-MB-468, MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells were analyzed by western-blotting using mouse mAb anti–β1 integrin (BD Biosciences), mouse mAb anti–β3 integrin (BD Biosciences), and mouse mAb anti-β5 integrin (Santa Cruz), as primary antibodies at the dilutions recommended by the manufacturer (1:500–1:1,000).
Nano-texture analysis with Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)
AFM measurements were performed as described before [27]. Briefly, cells were chemically stabilized by 1% glutardialdehyde fixation. AFM was carried out in PBS-buffer using soft, gold-coated cantilevers (0.01 N/m, MLCT, VEECO, Mannheim, Germany) in contact mode at forces less than 5 nN. For texture analysis, subcellular scan areas of (10μm2) are recorded. Topographical data of the cell surfaces were analysed using the nAnostic™-method applying customized, proprietary algorithms (Serend-ip GmbH, Münster, Germany) [28]. Nanostructures protruding from the mean surface level are morphometrically evaluated through computer vision. Then, objects are filtered by size and shape; here, only structures of positive local deviational volume (LDV), smaller than 500 nm in height and an area smaller than 1μm2 were considered. Number values are extracted for the count of classified objects (per image) and the sum of their deviational volumes (LDVs).
Confocal immunofluorescence microscopy
MDA-MB-468 and MCF-7 breast cancer cells were subjected to control precursor or miR-142-3p precursor transfection and analyzed by confocal immunofluorescence microscopy on a Leica TCS microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany), or a Zeiss LSM 780 (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) (Z-stacks) using Plan-Apochromat 63x/1.40 Oil DIC objectives. Human skin fibroblasts [23] were used as a control. Samples were prepared as previously described [10] using ALEXA555-phalloidin (Invitrogen, Eugene, OR, USA, 1:1000) for staining of actin filaments, as well rabbit-anti-Integrin-αV (Cell Signaling, 1:100), mouse mAb anti–human integrin αvβ3 (Millipore, 1:100), mouse Ab anti-human vinculin (Sigma, 1:300) and appropriate ALEXA488 or ALEXA594-labeled secondary antibodies (Invitrogen, 1:600). Cell nuclei were visualized by 4’,6’-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining (Sigma, 1:5,000).
Matrigel invasion assay
24 h after pre-miR transfection, twenty-five thousand cells in 0.5 ml DMEM/10% FCS (fetal calf serum) were added in duplicates to the upper compartments of BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chambers (BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany). After 24 h, the medium was replaced by serum-free DMEM. To the lower compartment, 0.75 ml DMEM/10% FCS was added. After 48 h, the cells on the lower surface were fixed and stained with Diff-Quik dye (Medion, Düdingen, Switzerland). Excised and mounted filter membranes were photographed using a Zeiss Axiovert microscope equipped with Axiovision software (Zeiss, Jena, Germany) at x100 magnification. For each membrane, cells in five visual fields were counted. Relative invasiveness was expressed as percentage of the cell number on compound-treated inserts compared with control inserts (n>3).
siRNA-mediated depletion of ITGAV and WASL
Cells were transfected with 20 nM ITGAV- or WASL-specific siRNA, or a nonspecific control siRNA (all from Ambion, Darmstadt, Germany), essentially as previously described [10]. Knockdown efficiency was confirmed by qPCR and Western blotting. Matrigel invasion chamber assays, quantitative AFM analysis and digital holographic microscopy were performed 72h after transfection.
Statistics
All experiments were repeated at least three times in duplicates. Data are presented as the mean values±s.e.m. The data were tested for significance employing Student’s unpaired t-test. The level of significance was set at P<0.05.
Results
miR-142-3p inhibits invasiveness of human breast cancer cells
In previous studies, miR-142-3p expression correlated with the invasiveness of different breast cancer subtypes [8], with highly invasive bone metastatic MDA-MB-231 cells [29] and with biopsies of the triple-negative subtype [11]. Moreover, miR-142-3p has been identified as part of a signature of six miRNAs which discriminates between tumors from BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and noncarriers with >90% accuracy [30]. We hypothesized that upregulation or inhibition of miR-142-3p expression in breast cancer cells may regulate target molecules playing key roles in breast cancer pathogenesis, thus inducing a more benign phenotype. Using transient microRNA precursor and antimiR inhibitor transfection, we studied the impact of miR-142-3p on invasiveness and cell viability in a panel of three well-established breast cancer cell lines exhibiting different degrees of dedifferentiation, different hormone receptor status, BRCA1 variant expression levels [31] and malignant potential [22, 32]. This way, we wanted to reflect the heterogeneity of the disease, and investigate if the impact of miR-142-3p on breast cancer cell behaviour is uniform, or restricted to certain subtypes. qPCR analysis in the cell lines MDA-MD-231 (mesenchymal morphology, estrogen receptor negative (ER–), claudin-low, highly invasive and tumorigenic in nude mice), MDA-MB-468 (weakly luminal epithelial-like, ER–, Ki67 high, intermediate invasiveness, forms tumors in nude mice) and MCF-7 (luminal-epithelial-like, ER+, Ki67 low, weakly invasive in vitro), revealed about 80-fold higher miR-142-3p expression in MDA-MB-231 cells compared to MDA-MB-468 and MCF-7, which exhibited similar expression levels (S1 Fig). For functional studies, cells were transiently transfected with a control miRNA precursor, pre-miR-142-3p, or an antimiR-142-3p, respectively. Successful transfection was confirmed by qPCR (S1 Fig). In MDA-MB-468 and MCF-7 cells, miR-142-3p upregulation inhibited in vitro Matrigel invasiveness by 68% and 35%, respectively (Fig 1A and 1B). While miR-142-3p upregulation yielded highly variable results in MDA-MB-231 cells, anti-miR-142-3p transfection increased invasiveness by more than 50% (Fig 1A). miR-142-3p upregulation had no significant impact on cell viability (Fig 1C). However, phase contrast and digital holographic microscopy revealed a significant decrease in cell size and volume induced by miR-142-3p (Fig 1D–1I), suggesting that changes in cell shape and size may be linked to the invasion phenotype.
miR-142-3p upregulation reduces expression of gene products linked to cytoskeletal function and cell motility
In silico analysis using the MiRanda-algorithm [33] yielded more than 4300 predicted mRNA targets of miR-142-3p. To screen for miR-142-3p-regulated candidate genes, we compared the transcriptome of miR-142-3p-overexpressing MDA-MB-231 cells against that of control miRNA precursor-transfected cells using Affymetrix U133v2 Gene Arrays. 76 downregulated and 132 upregulated genes fulfilled the filtering criteria of P<0.05 and fold change ≥1.5 (S1 Table). Considering their gene ontology groupings, several proteins were potentially linked to the observed changes in invasiveness: The genes encoding Integrin-αV, a transmembrane protein involved in breast cancer metastasis and proliferation [19–21], N-WASP, a protein involved in signaling from cell membrane receptors to the actin cytoskeleton [34–36], Rac1, a cell motility-regulating Rho-GTPase involved in cancerogenesis [16,37] and Cofilin-2, a protein modulating actin reorganization and thus cell motility [38] were downregulated upon pre-miR-142-3p transfection, as confirmed by qPCR (Fig 2A–2D). Downregulation of additional predicted miR-142-3p targets was confirmed in two of the three cell lines (Fig 2E–2I). These mRNAs included the Rho-GTPase-associated kinase ROCK2 [10,39], the interleukin-6 receptor subunit IL6ST [40], the pluripotency-associated transcription factor KLF4 [41], progesterone membrane component PGRMC2 [42], and the adenylate cyclase ADCY9, an inflammation-related, known target of miR-142-3p [13]. With the exception of an upregulation of ROCK2 in MDA-MB-231 and of FLT1 in MCF-7 cells (S2 Fig), antimiR-treatment did not significantly affect expression of all investigated predicted [33] miR-142-3p targets (results not shown).
ITGAV and WASL are direct targets of post-transcriptional regulation by miR-142-3p
According to the miRanda algorithm provided by the microRNA.org database [33], the 3’UTRs of ITGAV and WASL are predicted to be targeted by miR-142-2p (Fig 3A). To formally prove direct regulation of the ITGAV 3’UTR by miR-142-3p, we performed luciferase assays employing a plasmid allowing for simultaneous constitutive expression of renilla luciferase, and of firefly luciferase under the control of the 3’UTR of human ITGAV (Fig 3B upper panel). pre-miR-142-3p transfection of MDA-MB-468 and MCF-7 cells resulted in significant decreases of in normalized firefly luciferase activity (Fig 3C). Using an analogous WASL 3’UTR-assay (Fig 3B lower panel), a significant regulation could be confirmed for all three cell lines (Fig 3D). miR-142-3p-dependent downregulation of Integrin-αV (MCF-7, MDA-MB-468) and N-WASP (all cell lines) was further confirmed at the protein level through Western Blotting (Fig 3E–3G; S3 Fig). Although Rac1 is targeted by miR-142-3p in hepatocellular carcinoma cells [16], we could not confirm altered expression at the protein level (results not shown). Cycloheximide inhibitor studies revealed that Rac1 protein levels were stable within our timeframe of investigation in the absence of new protein synthesis (K. Brüggemann, unpublished data).
Transfection with pre-miR-142-3p causes loss of membrane protrusions in MDA-MB-468 cells
As miR-142-3p-dependent regulation of cytoskeletal structures may be involved in the observed invasion phenotype, we preformed further morphological investigations using atomic force microscopy (AFM). Typical height profiles obtained by Nano Texture Analysis demonstrate a smoother surface of cells treated with miR-142-3p as compared to the fine ruffles exhibited by control cells (Fig 4, arrows). This observation is supported from mere inspection of the raw topographic images. When selecting spike-like protrusions by computer vision, it is obvious that their number is substantially diminished by miR-142-3p (green spots). Accordingly, the mean height of protrusions is reduced from 365 nm to 228 nm (data not shown). The distribution of objects does not exhibit a specific pattern; the location on the cell topography can be seen in the 3D-representation (Fig 4). Importantly, the object number is significantly reduced from 153 (control) to 61 (miRNA treated) and the sum of object volumes is significantly reduced accordingly from 1.29 fl to 0.49 fl (fl = 10–15 l) (Fig 4).
miR-142-3p overexpression results in substantially altered cell morphology
We next performed confocal immunofluorescence microscopy to analyze cell morphology using a complementary approach. Phase contrast microscopy and staining of the actin cytoskeleton with fluorescently labelled phalloidin confirmed a reduction of cell size (Fig 5A and 5B, S4 Fig). Formation of actin stress fibers was less evident in miR-142-3p-transfected cells compared to controls, and actin appeared to have a more cortical distribution. N-WASP staining confirmed reduced expression in pre-miR-142-3p-transfected cells but did not reveal altered subcellular localization (S5 Fig). However, in control siRNA-treated MDA-MB-468 cells, immunofluorescent staining and analysis of Z-stacks revealed a prominent localization of integrin-αV at intercellular junctions, and little or no colocalization with the focal adhesion protein vinculin (Fig 5E). Integrin-αV expression was reduced following miR-142-3p transfection. Notably, while most sites of cell-cell contact were positive for integrin-αV in control cells, several neighbouring miR-142-3p transfected cells did not show integrin-αV staining (Fig 5E, arrows), resulting in a fusiform morphology. The intercellular integrin staining was not due to aberrant reactivity, as confirmed by secondary antibody negative controls (Fig 5D), and a proper focal adhesion-like staining pattern in human skin fibroblasts (Fig 5C). We next analyzed the expression of β-integrin subunits in MDA-MB-468, MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells. Immunofluorescence microscopy and Western blot analysis revealed that integrin-αVβ3 was only expressed in MDA-MB-231 cells and fibroblasts, but not in MDA-MB-468 or MCF-7 cells (Fig 6A and 6B). In contrast to the intercellular integrin-αV staining observed in MDA-MB-468 cells (Fig 5E), integrin-αVβ3 showed a focal-adhesion-like staining pattern in MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig 6A). Western blot analysis furthermore confirmed that all cell lines expressed integrin-β5 and integrin-β1, as reported previously [43]. While tubulin-normalized integrin-β5 levels were comparable between cell lines, integrin-β1 was strongly expressed by MDA-MB-231 cells, followed by intermediate levels in MCF-7, and rather weak expression in MDA-MB-468 cells (Fig 6B). We next aimed at identifying the individual contributions of WASL and ITGAV to the miR-142-3p dependent cell phenotype, employing siRNA technology. WASL depletion by siRNA significantly inhibited MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 invasiveness, whereas ITGAV knockdown resulted in significant inhibition of MCF-7 Matrigel invasion and a trend for inhibition in MDA-MB-231 cells (P = 0.06, N = 8) (Fig 7), thus generating a phenocopy of the miR-142-3p-mediated impact on cellular invasiveness. Quantitative morphological analysis of MDA-MB-468 cells subjected to ITGAV- and WASL-siRNA knockdown revaled a significantly reduced number of membrane protrusions upon WASL-depletion, as determined by AFM (Fig 8A), suggesting a major contribution of WASL to this miR-142-3p-induced phenotype. In contrast, only ITGAV-, but not WASL-siRNA knockdown, induced a significant reduction of cell volume and dry mass (Fig 8B and 8C).
Discussion
In this functional in vitro study, we have demonstrated a novel role for miR-142-3p, a miRNA dysregulated in breast cancer compared to healthy tissue [8,11] in the regulation of breast cancer cell invasiveness. Within the cell lines investigated in this study, miR-142-3p showed a non-uniform distribution, which is in accordance with a differential expression of miR-142-3p in different subtypes of breast cancer [8,11]. The relatively higher expression of miR-142-3p in MDA-MB-231 cells compared to MCF-7 and MDA-MB-468 may be the reason for the efficiency of antimiR-inhibition in these cells, whereas MCF-7 and MD-MB-468 already displayed low miR-142-3p expression, and were thus less prone to the inhibitory approach. Using advanced microscopy techniques, we demonstrated that reduced invasiveness is associated with reduced numbers of membrane protrusions, alterations in cell shape and reductions in cancer cell size and volume. While Affymetrix analysis of the transciptome of miR-142-3p overexpressing cells revealed a dysregulation of numerous mRNAs compared to controls (S1 Table), a group of cytoskeletal elements and regulators of cytoskeletal function has emerged as functionally relevant prime candidates responsible for the phenotypic changes. Among these, WASL, an Arp2/3-dependent regulator of actin polymerization [34–36], was identified as a major contributor to the antiinvasive action of miR-142-3p. Not only was its 3’UTR-dependent regulation by miR-142-3p confirmed at the mRNA and protein levels, its siRNA depletion also generated a phenocopy of the invasion phenotype, and substantially reduced the formation of membrane protrusions. Indeed, reduction of WASL expression renders macrophages rounder and less polarized, in accordance with the morphological changes observed in our breast cancer cells [44]. The authors could furthermore demonstrate that podosomes of WASL-depleted macrophages were unable to degrade extracellular matrix due to a mistargeting of metalloproteinases, thus providing a link to an invasion phenotype. The WASL-dependent formation of invasive membrane protrusions has been identified as an important mechanism of triggering invasive behaviour of human breast cancer cells, and can be induced by several pathways including estrogen- [45], PDGF- [46] and EGF-induced signaling [47]. According to our results, it would be conceivable that miR-142-3p-dependent regulation of WASL is involved in the generation of microspikes, since it is responsible for the branching of f-actin strands [34,36,48], and a developing branch will go through a stage of spiking upwards. An inhibition of branching will therefore diminish the protrusions spiking out of the cell. Indeed, protrusions essential for in vivo migration and invasion of tumor cells are formed dependent on WASL [49,50]. Notably, WASL function is closely related to integrins [51], and several signal transducers downstream of this family of heterodimeric matrix receptors, including the kinases FAK [45] and ROCK [52], and small GTPases of the Rho family [53,54].
Notably, the integrin subunit ITGAV was identified as a regulatory target for miR-142-3p in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-468 cells. Consistent with the antiinvasive effect of ITGAV siRNA knockdown in our study, a role of ITGAV in modulating breast cancer metastasis was previously demonstrated, identifying a matrix-dependent role of this integrin in breast cancer cell adhesion and migration [55,56], and a functional interplay with p38 MAPK and uPA [57] as mechanistic aspects. Indeed, drugs blocking ITGAV function have been successful in preclinical mouse models of breast cancer metastasis [20,21], underscoring the importance of miR-142-3p-dependent ITGAV regulation in our in vitro system. Surprisingly, we could not demonstrate regulation of ITGAV by miR-142-3p in MDA-MB-231 cells at the 3’UTR and protein level, although this mode of regulation was utilized in MDA-MB-468 and MCF-7 cells. We can only speculate on the underlying mechanisms. It is conceivable that a miR-142-3p-dependent factor responsible for posttranscriptional regulation of ITGAV is expressed in MDA-MB-231 cells, but not in the other cell lines, thus enabling to neutralize the effect seen in MDA-MB-468 and MCF-7 cells. Indeed, a differential regulation of some of the miRNA targets identified in this study exists and may have modulated the cellular response (Fig 2), as ROCK2 is not significantly regulated by miR-142-3p in MCF-7 cells, ADCY9 and IL6ST are not regulated in MDA-MB-468 cells, whereas KLF4 and PGRMC2 are not regulated in MDA-MB-231 cells. Moreover, crosstalk between different integrin subunits is known to affect their mRNA stability [58], and differential integrin expression patterns in our cell lines may have affected the experimental results. Indeed, an analysis of β-integrin subunit expression in our cell lines revealed that the β3-subunit was only expressed in MDA-MB-231 cells, but not in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-468 cells. In combination with integrin-αV, different β-integrin subunits can affect cancer cell behavior via different mechanisms. For example, αvβ1 induces the proinvasive process of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition via binding to tenascin C [59], whereas β3-subunits affect this process by modulating TGFβ-signaling [60]. In contrast, integrin αVβ5 promotes breast cancer cell invasiveness in a PAK4-dependent mechanism [61]. Independent of the β-subunit involvement, a reduced expression of integrin-αV would be expected to result in reduced invasiveness of the affected breast cancer cell line, which is consistent with our findings. With respect to differentially affected cell behaviour, it has to be considered that MDA-MB-231 cells harbor numerous activating mutations, which lead to context dependent responses to growth factor stimulation [62] and miRNAs [9,63]. For example, miR-145 is not capable of modulating MDA-MB-231 proliferation and apoptosis because of a TP53 mutation and an ER-negative status, whereas it is capable of doing so in TP53 wild-type cells [63]. Possibly, similar mechanisms could play in the role in the case of miR-142-3p and ITGAV in MDA-MB-231 cells. While a reduction in invasiveness by miR-142-3p upregulation was seen in all three cell lines, this effect was not statistically significant in MDA-MB-231 cells, indicating a more variable response that may be linked to the higher basal expression level of miR-142-3p compared to the other cell lines (S1 Fig). Therefore, a further upregulation of miR-142-3p may have lower impact in these cells compared to MDA-MB-468 and MCF-7 cells expressing lower levels, whereas antimiR-treatment had the opposite effect. Nevertheless, the increased invasiveness of MDA-MB-231 cells treated with antimiR-142-3p would be in line with the observed inhibitory effect of WASL siRNA depletion on MDA-MB-231 cells. Impairment of the actin cytoskeleton-associated function of integrin-αVβ3 [64] may have additionally contributed to the impact of ITGAV-siRNA depletion in MDA-MB-231 cells. However MDA-MB-468 apparently utilize a different mechanism, as integrin-αV was localized at cell-cell contacts. Indeed, there is evidence that αV-integrins can localize to cell-cell junctions [65,66]. Importantly, in pancreatic and breast carcinoma, αvβ3 integrin forms a complex with c-Src kinase, and this complex is signalling active in the absence of ligand occupation, i.e. when cells are grown in suspension [67]. These findings thus indicate that αv integrins can have a signalling function in the absence of ligand binding. Our siRNA studies on ITGAV indicate that this function is linked to the invasion phenotype, and to the regulation of cell size, which may be linked to cell rounding upon loss of cell-cell contact and reduced activation of signaling pathways downstream of integrin-αV [68].
Due to their mode of action, which is based both on fully and partially complementary base pairing of the miRNAs seed sequence with cognate mRNAs, miRNAs are capable of modulating the expression of more than one target [3,4]. This concept is confirmed by the results of our transcriptomic analysis, which showed a differential expression of 208 mRNAs upon miR-142-3p upregulation in MDA-MB-231 cells (S1 Table). IL6ST, KLF4 and PGRMC2 have been linked to cancer pathogenesis [40–42], and downregulation of their mRNA expression by miR-142-3p may therefore be worth elucidating in future studies. Similarly, the upregulation of the protease inhibitors SERPINB2 and SERPINA6 in miR-142-3p-transfected cells (S1 Table) may have contributed to the antiinvasive phenotype. With respect to factors modulating cytoskeletal function, a downregulation of Rac1, Cofilin-2 and ROCK2 may have additionally influenced the invasion phenotype. Indeed, the small GTPase Rac1 affects cell spreading, directed cell migration and lamellipodia formation, and has been identified as a regulatory target of miR-142-3p in hepatocellular carcinoma cells [16]. A recent study could demonstrate that overexpression of constitutively active Rac1 is capable of suppressing a spreading defect of MDA-MB-231 cells caused by miR-149-dependent targeting of Rap1a and Rap1b [37], demonstrating the importance of this cytoskeletal regulator for cell adhesion and motility. Likewise, cofilin-2 is an important regulator of actin dynamics [69], and has been shown to be overexpressed in agressive forms of breast cancer [38]. While long-term downregulation of RAC1 and CFL2 mRNA levels by miR-142-3p in patient tumor tissues may be of relevance for metastatic spread, it cannot serve as an explanation for our in vitro observations, as a downregulation at the protein level was not observed due to a high protein stability, or low turnover rates, respectively (K. Brüggemann, unpublished).
In summary, this study has revealed a novel role for miR-142-3p in regulating breast cancer cell invasiveness, which could at least partially be attributed to a targeting of WASL and ITGAV, and possibly additional cytoskeletal regulators. Various modes of therapeutic miRNA delivery via microvesicle-mediated intravenous application, nanocomplexes, viral vectors, non-viral carriers or local application are currently under investigation and have been successfully applied in preclinical models for a variety of miRNAs [70–72]. Therefore, future investigations towards a role of miR-142-3p as a potential anti-metastasis drug for breast cancer appear rewarding in order to expand our understanding of miR-142-3p as a novel cytoskeletal regulator beyond basic cell biology.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Birgit Pers, Kirsten Ewering, Angelika Vollmer and Steffi Ketelhut for skillful technical assistance, and nAnoalytics (Münster, Germany) for technical support (AFM). Microarray analyses were performed at the Integrated Functional Genomics (IFG), Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research (IZKF) at the Medical Faculty of the Westphalian Wilhelms-University Muenster.
Data Availability
These data are available through the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), accession number GSE50829.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by Innovative Medizinische Forschung (IMF), Medical Faculty Münster University, grant number I-Gö 111110, URL: http://campus.uni-muenster.de/imf.html; IZKF, Medical Faculty Münster University, grant numberIZKF Eb2/020/14, URL: http://campus.uni-muenster.de/izkf.html; BMBF grants FKZ13N10937 and 01DJ130022A; URL: http://www.bmbf.de/en/index.php; Open Access Publication Fund of University of Muenster (no grant number); URL: http://www.uni-muenster.de/Publizieren/service/publikationsfonds/; EU H2020 RISE-MSCA Project grant number 645756 (GLYCANC) URL: http://cordis.europa.eu/search/result_en?q=GLYCANC&searchType=simple. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Hutvágner G, McLachlan J, Pasquinelli AE, Bálint E, Tuschl T, Zamore PD. (2001) A cellular function for the RNA-interference enzyme Dicer in the maturation of the let-7 small temporal RNA. Science 293: 834–838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Wang Y, Medvid R, Melton C, Jaenisch R, Blelloch R. (2007) DGCR8 is essential for microRNA biogenesis and silencing of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nat. Genet. 39: 380–385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Ibrahim SA, Hassan H, Götte M.(2014) MicroRNA regulation of proteoglycan function in cancer. FEBS J. 281:5009–5022. 10.1111/febs.13026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Doench JG, Sharp PA. (2004) Specificity of microRNA target selection in translational repression. Genes Dev. 18:504–511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Iorio MV, Ferracin M, Liu CG, Veronese A, Spizzo R, Sabbioni S, et al. (2005) MicroRNA Gene Expression Deregulation in Human Breast Cancer. Cancer Res. 65: 7065–7070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Ma L, Teruya-Feldstein J, Weinberg RA. (2007) Tumour invasion and metastasis initiated by microRNA-10b in breast cancer. Nature 449: 682–688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Baffa R, Fassan M, Volinia S, O'Hara B, Liu CG, Palazzo JP, et al. (2009) MicroRNA expression profiling of human metastatic cancers identifies cancer gene targets. J. Pathol. 219: 214–221. 10.1002/path.2586 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Volinia S, Galasso M, Sana ME, Wise TF, Palatini J, Huebner K, et al. (2012) Breast cancer signatures for invasiveness and prognosis defined by deep sequencing of microRNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 3024–3029. 10.1073/pnas.1200010109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Götte M, Mohr C, Koo CY, Stock C, Vaske AK, Viola M, et al. (2010) miR-145-dependent targeting of junctional adhesion molecule A and modulation of fascin expression are associated with reduced breast cancer cell motility and invasiveness. Oncogene 29: 6569–6580. 10.1038/onc.2010.386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Ibrahim SA, Yip GW, Stock C, Pan JW, Neubauer C, Poeter M, et al. (2012) Targeting of syndecan-1 by microRNA miR-10b promotes breast cancer cell motility and invasiveness via a Rho-GTPase- and E-cadherin-dependent mechanism. Int. J. Cancer 131: E884–96. 10.1002/ijc.27629 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Janssen EAM, Slewa A, Gudlaugsson E, Jonsdottir K, Skaland I, Søiland H, et al. (2010) Biologic profiling of lymph node negative breast cancers by means of microRNA expression. Mod. Pathol. 23: 1567–1576. 10.1038/modpathol.2010.177 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Bissels U, Wild S, Tomiuk S, Hafner M, Scheel H, Mihailovic A, et al. (2011) Combined characterization of microRNA and mRNA profiles delineates early differentiation pathways of CD133+ and CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Stem Cells 29: 847–857. 10.1002/stem.627 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Huang B, Zhao J, Lei Z, Shen S, Li D, Shen GX, et al. (2009) miR-142-3p restricts cAMP production in CD4+CD25− T cells and CD4+CD25+ TREG cells by targeting AC9 mRNA. EMBO Rep. 10: 180–185. 10.1038/embor.2008.224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Flamant S, Ritchie W, Guilhot J, Holst J, Bonnet ML, Chomel JC, et al. (2010) Micro-RNA response to imatinib mesylate in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Haematologica, 95: 1325–1333. 10.3324/haematol.2009.020636 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Juan D, Alexe G, Antes T, Liu H, Madabhushi A, Delisi C, et al. (2010) Identification of a MicroRNA Panel for Clear-cell Kidney Cancer. Urology 75: 835–841. 10.1016/j.urology.2009.10.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Wu L, Cai C, Wang X, Liu M, Li X, Tang H. (2011) MicroRNA-142-3p, a new regulator of RAC1, suppresses the migration and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. FEBS Lett. 585: 1322–1330. 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.03.067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Schepeler T, Reinert JT, Ostenfeld MS, Christensen LL, Silahtaroglu AN, Dyrskjøt L, et al. (2008) Diagnostic and Prognostic MicroRNAs in Stage II Colon Cancer. Cancer Res. 68: 6416–6424. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Marini F, Luzi E, Brandi ML. (2011) MicroRNA Role in Thyroid Cancer Development. J. Thyroid Res. 2011: 407123 10.4061/2011/407123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Brooks PC, Strömblad S, Klemke R, Visscher D, Sarkar FH, Cheresh DA. (1995) Antiintegrin alpha v beta 3 blocks human breast cancer growth and angiogenesis in human skin. J. Clin. Invest. 96: 1815–1822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Chen Q, Manning CD, Millar H, McCabe FL, Ferrante C, Sharp C, et al. (2008) CNTO 95, a fully human anti alphav integrin antibody, inhibits cell signaling, migration, invasion, and spontaneous metastasis of human breast cancer cells. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 25: 139–148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Wu YJ, Muldoon LL, Gahramanov S, Kraemer DF, Marshall DJ, Neuwelt EA. (2012) Targeting αV-integrins decreased metastasis and increased survival in a nude rat breast cancer brain metastasis model. J. Neurooncol. 110: 27–36. 10.1007/s11060-012-0942-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Lacroix M, Leclercq G. (2004) Relevance of Breast Cancer Cell Lines as Models for Breast Tumours: An Update. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 83: 249–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Seidler DG, Faiyaz-Ul-Haque M, Hansen U, Yip GW, Zaidi SH, Teebi AS, et al. (2006) Defective glycosylation of decorin and biglycan, altered collagen structure, and abnormal phenotype of the skin fibroblasts of an Ehlers-Danlos syndrome patient carrying the novel Arg270Cys substitution in galactosyltransferase I (beta4GalT-7). J. Mol. Med. (Berl). 84:583–594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Kemper B, Carl D, Schnekenburger J, Bredebusch I, Schäfer M, Domschke W, et al. (2006) Investigation of living pancreas tumor cells by digital holographic microscopy. J. Biomed. Opt. 11: 34005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Kemper B, Kosmeier S, Langehanenberg P, von Bally G, Bredebusch I, Domschke W, et al. (2007) Integral refractive index determination of living suspension cells by multifocus digital holographic phase contrast microscopy. J. Biomed. Opt. 12: 054009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Bettenworth D, Lenz P, Krausewitz P, Brückner M, Ketelhut S, Domagk D, et al. (2014) Quantitative stain-free and continuous multimodal monitoring of wound healing in vitro with digital holographic microscopy. PLoS One. 9:e107317 10.1371/journal.pone.0107317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Riethmüller C, Jungmann P, Wegener J, Oberleithner H. (2006) Bradykinin shifts endothelial fluid passage from para- to transcellular routes. Pflugers Arch. 453: 157–165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Thoelking G, Reiss B, Wegener J, Oberleithner H, Pavenstaedt H, Riethmuller C. (2010) Nanotopography follows force in TGF-beta1 stimulated epithelium. Nanotechnology 21: 265102 10.1088/0957-4484/21/26/265102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Pollari S, Leivonen SK, Perälä M, Fey V, Käkönen SM, Kallioniemi O. (2012) Identification of microRNAs inhibiting TGF-β-induced IL-11 production in bone metastatic breast cancer cells. PLoS ONE 7: e37361 10.1371/journal.pone.0037361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Tanic M, Yanowski K, Gómez-López G, Rodriguez-Pinilla MS, Marquez-Rodas I, Osorio A, et al. (2015) MicroRNA expression signatures for the prediction of BRCA1/2 mutation-associated hereditary breast cancer in paraffin-embedded formalin-fixed breast tumors. Int. J. Cancer 136:593–602. 10.1002/ijc.29021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Elstrodt F, Hollestelle A, Nagel JH, Gorin M, Wasielewski M, van den Ouweland A, et al. (2006) BRCA1 mutation analysis of 41 human breast cancer cell lines reveals three new deleterious mutants. Cancer Res. 66:41–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Holliday DL, Speirs V. (2011) Choosing the right cell line for breast cancer research.Breast Cancer Res. 13:215 10.1186/bcr2889 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Betel D, Wilson M, Gabow A, Marks DS, Sander C. (2008) The microRNA.org resource: targets and expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 36: D149–153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Kovacs EM, Verma S, Ali RG, Ratheesh A, Hamilton NA, Akhmanova A, et al. (2011) NWASP regulates the epithelial junctional actin cytoskeleton through a non-canonical postnucleation pathway. Nat. Cell Biol. 13: 934–943. 10.1038/ncb2290 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Mogilner A, Oster G. (2003) Force generation by actin polymerization II: the elastic ratchet and tethered filaments. Biophys. J. 84: 1591–1605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Desmarais V, Yamaguchi H, Oser M, Soon L, Mouneimne G, Sarmiento C, et al. (2009) N-WASP and cortactin are involved in invadopodium-dependent chemotaxis to EGF in breast tumor cells. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 66: 303–316. 10.1002/cm.20361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Bischoff A, Huck B, Keller B, Strotbek M, Schmid S, Boerries M, et al. (2014) miR149 functions as a tumor suppressor by controlling breast epithelial cell migration and invasion. Cancer Res. 74:5256–5265. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-3319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Luo D, Wilson JM, Harvel N, Liu J, Pei L, Huang S, et al. (2013) A systematic evaluation of miRNA:mRNA interactions involved in the migration and invasion of breast cancer cells. J. Transl. Med. 11:57 10.1186/1479-5876-11-57 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Wong CC, Wong CM, Tung EK, Man K, Ng IO. (2009) Rho-kinase 2 is frequently overexpressed in hepatocellular carcinoma and involved in tumor invasion. Hepatology. 49:1583–1594. 10.1002/hep.22836 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Kästingsschäfer CS, Schäfer SD, Kiesel L, Götte M. (2015) miR-142-3p is a novel regulator of cell viability and proinflammatory signalling in endometrial stroma cells. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 30:553–556. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Yu F, Shi Y, Wang J, Li J, Fan D, Ai W. (2013) Deficiency of kruppel-like factor KLF4 in mammary tumor cells inhibits tumor growth and pulmonary metastasis and is accompanied by compromised recruitment of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Int. J. Cancer 133:2872–2883. 10.1002/ijc.28302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Albrecht C, Huck V, Wehling M, Wendler A. (2012) In vitro inhibition of SKOV-3 cell migration as a distinctive feature of progesterone receptor membrane component type 2 versus type 1. Steroids 77:1543–1550. 10.1016/j.steroids.2012.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Meyer T, Marshall JF, Hart IR. (1998) Expression of alphav integrins and vitronectin receptor identity in breast cancer cells. Br J Cancer. 77:530–536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Nusblat LM, Dovas A, Cox D. (2011) The non-redundant role of N-WASP in podosome-mediated matrix degradation in macrophages. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 90:205–212 10.1016/j.ejcb.2010.07.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Sanchez AM, Flamini MI, Baldacci C, Goglia L, Genazzani AR, Simoncini T. (2010) Estrogen receptor-alpha promotes breast cancer cell motility and invasion via focal adhesion kinase and N-WASP. Mol. Endocrinol. 24:2114–2125 10.1210/me.2010-0252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Takahashi K, Suzuki K. (2011) WAVE2, N-WASP, and Mena facilitate cell invasion via phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-dependent local accumulation of actin filaments. J. Cell. Biochem. 112:3421–3429. 10.1002/jcb.23276 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Kimura F, Iwaya K, Kawaguchi T, Kaise H, Yamada K, Mukai K, et al. (2010) Epidermal growth factor-dependent enhancement of invasiveness of squamous cell carcinoma of the breast. Cancer Sci. 101:1133–1140. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01527.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Giri A, Bajpai S, Trenton N, Jayatilaka H, Longmore GD, Wirtz D. (2013) The Arp2/3 complex mediates multigeneration dendritic protrusions for efficient 3-dimensional cancer cell migration. FASEB J. 27: 4089–4099. 10.1096/fj.12-224352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Yamaguchi H, Lorenz M, Kempiak S, Sarmiento C, Coniglio S, Symons M, et al. (2005) Molecular mechanisms of invadopodium formation: the role of the N-WASP-Arp2/3 complex pathway and cofilin. J. Cell Biol. 168: 441–452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Gligorijevic B, Wyckoff J, Yamaguchi H, Wang Y, Roussos ET, Condeelis J. (2012) N-WASP-mediated invadopodium formation is involved in intravasation and lung metastasis of mammary tumors. J. Cell Sci. 125: 724–734. 10.1242/jcs.092726 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Sturge J, Hamelin J, Jones GE. (2002) N-WASP activation by a beta1-integrin-dependent mechanism supports PI3K-independent chemotaxis stimulated by urokinase-type plasminogen activator. J. Cell Sci. 115:699–711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Escudero-Esparza A, Jiang WG, Martin TA. (2012) Claudin-5 is involved in breast cancer cell motility through the N-WASP and ROCK signalling pathways. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 31:43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Shekarabi M, Moore SW, Tritsch NX, Morris SJ, Bouchard JF, Kennedy TE. (2005) Deleted in colorectal cancer binding netrin-1 mediates cell substrate adhesion and recruits Cdc42, Rac1, Pak1, and N-WASP into an intracellular signaling complex that promotes growth cone expansion J. Neurosci. 25:3132–3141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Le Clainche C, Schlaepfer D, Ferrari A, Klingauf M, Grohmanova K, Veligodskiy A, et al. (2007) IQGAP1 stimulates actin assembly through the N-WASP-Arp2/3 pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 282:426–435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Wong NC, Mueller BM, Barbas CF, Ruminski P, Quaranta V, Lin EC, et al. (1998) Alphav integrins mediate adhesion and migration of breast carcinoma cell lines. Clin. Exp. Metastasis. 16:50–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Plopper GE, Domanico SZ, Cirulli V, Kiosses WB, Quaranta V. (1998) Migration of breast epithelial cells on Laminin-5: differential role of integrins in normal and transformed cell types. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 51:57–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Chen J, Baskerville C, Han Q, Pan ZK, Huang S. (2001) Alpha(v) integrin, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase, and urokinase plasminogen activator are functionally linked in invasive breast cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 276:47901–47905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Retta SF, Cassarà G, D'Amato M, Alessandro R, Pellegrino M, Degani S, et al. (2001) Cross talk between beta(1) and alpha(V) integrins: beta(1) affects beta(3) mRNA stability. Mol. Biol. Cell. 12:3126–3138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Katoh D, Nagaharu K, Shimojo N, Hanamura N, Yamashita M, Kozuka Y, et al. (2013) Binding of αvβ1 and αvβ6 integrins to tenascin-C induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition-like change of breast cancer cells. Oncogenesis. 2:e65 10.1038/oncsis.2013.27 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Galliher AJ, Schiemann WP. (2006) Beta3 integrin and Src facilitate transforming growth factor-beta mediated induction of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in mammary epithelial cells. Breast Cancer Res. 8:R42 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Zhang H, Li Z, Viklund EK, Strömblad S. (2002) P21-activated kinase 4 interacts with integrin alpha v beta 5 and regulates alpha v beta 5-mediated cell migration. J. Cell Biol. 158:1287–1297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Vijaya Kumar A, Salem Gassar E, Spillmann D, Stock C, Sen YP, Zhang T, et al. (2014) HS3ST2 modulates breast cancer cell invasiveness via MAP kinase- and Tcf4 (Tcf7l2)-dependent regulation of protease and cadherin expression. Int. J. Cancer 135:2579–2592. 10.1002/ijc.28921 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Spizzo R, Nicoloso MS, Lupini L, Lu Y, Fogarty J, Rossi S, et al. (2010) miR-145 participates with TP53 in a death-promoting regulatory loop and targets estrogen receptor-alpha in human breast cancer cells. Cell Death Differ. 17:246–254. 10.1038/cdd.2009.117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Havaki S, Kouloukoussa M, Amawi K, Drosos Y, Arvanitis LD, Goutas N, et al. (2007) Altered expression pattern of integrin alphavbeta3 correlates with actin cytoskeleton in primary cultures of human breast cancer. Cancer Cell Int. 7:16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Peddibhotla SS, Brinkmann BF, Kummer D, Tuncay H, Nakayama M, Adams RH, et al. (2013) Tetraspanin CD9 links junctional adhesion molecule-A to αvβ3 integrin to mediate basic fibroblast growth factor-specific angiogenic signaling. Mol. Biol. Cell. 24:933–944. 10.1091/mbc.E12-06-0481 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Thomas M, Felcht M, Kruse K, Kretschmer S, Deppermann C, Biesdorf A, et al. (2010) Angiopoietin-2 stimulation of endothelial cells induces alphavbeta3 integrin internalization and degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 285:23842–23849. 10.1074/jbc.M109.097543 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Desgrosellier JS, Barnes LA, Shields DJ, Huang M, Lau SK, Prévost N, et al. (2009) An integrin alpha(v)beta(3)-c-Src oncogenic unit promotes anchorage-independence and tumor progression. Nat. Med. 15:1163–1169. 10.1038/nm.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Lee HH, Chang ZF. (2008) Regulation of RhoA-dependent ROCKII activation by Shp2. J. Cell Biol. 181:999–1012. 10.1083/jcb.200710187 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Papalouka V, Arvanitis DA, Vafiadaki E, Mavroidis M, Papadodima SA, Spiliopoulou CA, et al. (2009) Muscle LIM protein interacts with cofilin 2 and regulates F-actin dynamics in cardiac and sk 1. Mol Cell Biol. 29:6046–58. 10.1128/MCB.00654-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Akao Y, Iio A, Itoh T, Noguchi S, Itoh Y, Ohtsuki Y, et al. (2011) Microvesicle-mediated RNA Molecule Delivery System Using Monocytes/Macrophages. Mol. Ther. 19: 395–399. 10.1038/mt.2010.254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Pereira DM, Rodrigues PM, Borralho PM, Rodrigues CM. (2012) Delivering the promise of miRNA cancer therapeutics. Drug Discov. Today 18: 282–289. 10.1016/j.drudis.2012.10.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Santos-Carballal B, Aaldering LJ, Ritzefeld M, Pereira S, Sewald N, Moerschbacher BM, et al. (2015) Physicochemical and biological characterization of chitosan-microRNA nanocomplexes for gene delivery to MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Sci Rep. 5:13567 10.1038/srep13567 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
These data are available through the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), accession number GSE50829.