Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1993 Jun 15;90(12):5574–5577. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.12.5574

A molecular phylogeny for marine turtles: trait mapping, rate assessment, and conservation relevance.

B W Bowen 1, W S Nelson 1, J C Avise 1
PMCID: PMC46763  PMID: 8516304

Abstract

Nucleotide sequences from the cytochrome b gene of mitochondrial DNA were employed to resolve phylogenetic controversies and to assess molecular evolutionary rates in marine turtles (Chelonioidea). Findings of special relevance to conservation biology include discovery of a distant relationship between Natator and other cheloniid species, the paraphyly of Chelonia mydas with respect to Chelonia agassizi, and genetic distinctiveness of Lepidochelys kempi from Lepidochelys olivacea. A longstanding debate in evolutionary ecology was resolved by phylogenetic mapping of dietary habits, which indicates that the spongivore Eretmochelys imbricata evolved from a carnivorous rather than a herbivorous ancestor. Sequence divergences at intergeneric and interfamilial levels, when assessed against fossil-based separation times, support previous suggestions (from microevolutionary comparisons) that mitochondrial DNA in marine turtles evolves much more slowly than under the "conventional" vertebrate clock. This slow pace of nucleotide replacement is consistent with recent hypotheses linking substitution rate to generation length and metabolic pace.

Full text

PDF
5574

Images in this article

5575Fig. 1
on p.5575

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Avise J. C., Bowen B. W., Lamb T., Meylan A. B., Bermingham E. Mitochondrial DNA evolution at a turtle's pace: evidence for low genetic variability and reduced microevolutionary rate in the Testudines. Mol Biol Evol. 1992 May;9(3):457–473. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowen B. W., Meylan A. B., Avise J. C. An odyssey of the green sea turtle: Ascension Island revisited. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Jan;86(2):573–576. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.2.573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bowen B. W., Meylan A. B., Avise J. C. Evolutionary distinctiveness of the endangered Kemp's ridley sea turtle. Nature. 1991 Aug 22;352(6337):709–711. doi: 10.1038/352709a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Irwin D. M., Kocher T. D., Wilson A. C. Evolution of the cytochrome b gene of mammals. J Mol Evol. 1991 Feb;32(2):128–144. doi: 10.1007/BF02515385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980 Dec;16(2):111–120. doi: 10.1007/BF01731581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kocher T. D., Thomas W. K., Meyer A., Edwards S. V., Päbo S., Villablanca F. X., Wilson A. C. Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Aug;86(16):6196–6200. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.16.6196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lansman R. A., Shade R. O., Shapira J. F., Avise J. C. The use of restriction endonucleases to measure mitochondrial DNA sequence relatedness in natural populations. III. Techniques and potential applications. J Mol Evol. 1981;17(4):214–226. doi: 10.1007/BF01732759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Martin A. P., Palumbi S. R. Body size, metabolic rate, generation time, and the molecular clock. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 May 1;90(9):4087–4091. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.9.4087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Meylan A. Spongivory in hawksbill turtles: a diet of glass. Science. 1988 Jan 22;239(4838):393–395. doi: 10.1126/science.239.4838.393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Saiki R. K., Gelfand D. H., Stoffel S., Scharf S. J., Higuchi R., Horn G. T., Mullis K. B., Erlich H. A. Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. Science. 1988 Jan 29;239(4839):487–491. doi: 10.1126/science.2448875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Saitou N., Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987 Jul;4(4):406–425. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sanger F., Nicklen S., Coulson A. R. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Dec;74(12):5463–5467. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wu C. I., Li W. H. Evidence for higher rates of nucleotide substitution in rodents than in man. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Mar;82(6):1741–1745. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.6.1741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES