Abstract
Arsenic (As) is a widely distributed toxic element in the environment and microorganisms have developed resistance mechanisms in order to tolerate it. The cellular response of the chemoorganotrophic arsenite (As[III])-oxidizing α-Proteobacteria, Sinorhizobium sp. strain A2, to arsenic was examined in the present study. Several proteins associated with arsenite oxidase and As resistance were shown to be accumulated in the presence of As(III). A shift in central carbon metabolism from the tricarboxylic acid pathway to glyoxylate pathway was also observed in response to oxidative stress. Our results revealed the strategy of the As(III)-oxidizing Sinorhizobium strain to mitigate arsenic toxicity and oxidative damage by multiple metabolic adaptations.
Keywords: arsenic stress, arsenite oxidase, aio, proteome
Arsenic (As) is an abundant toxic element in the environment, and exists in four oxidation states (-III, 0, III, and V). The most common oxidation states in natural systems are the trivalent (arsenite; As[III]) and pentavalent (arsenate; As[V]) states, which exhibit different mechanisms of toxicity in microorganisms and other biota (16, 27). Arsenate is a phosphate analog and interferes with critical cellular functions by replacing phosphate. Arsenite strongly reacts with sulfhydryl groups in proteins and is considered to be more toxic than As(V). Previous studies reported that As induced oxidative stress by generating reactive oxygen species (ROS), which also cause cellular damage (10, 18, 22).
Microorganisms have developed resistance mechanisms in order to tolerate As, with some microorganisms utilizing As in respiratory metabolism to gain energy for growth (1, 2, 6, 25). The As resistance mechanism in bacteria, the ars system, typically involves the reduction of As(V) to As(III) by arsenate reductase (ArsC), and As(III) is then extruded by a membrane ArsB/ACR3 efflux pump. Although the ars operon is variably organized, it is widely distributed and conserved across numerous prokaryotic taxa (12, 24). The oxidation of As(III) coupled to the reduction of O2 is catalyzed by arsenite oxidase (Aio) and is regarded as a detoxification mechanism in numerous heterotrophic bacteria (25), some of which are also hyper-tolerant of As(III) (i.e. 10~20 mM) (3, 5, 8, 13). These Aio-dependent As(III)-oxidizing bacteria have been detected in numerous As-contaminated environments (5, 11, 20), indicating their vital role in controlling the redox cycling of As in such systems.
More detailed investigations on cellular responses among metabolically versatile groups of As(III)-oxidizers need to be conducted in order to obtain a better understand of how As(III)-oxidizing bacteria have evolved to survive in high As environments. In the present study, we performed a proteome analysis of the chemoorganotrophic As(III)-oxidizing α-Proteobacteria, Sinorhizobium sp. strain A2, in order to elucidate its cellular responses to As. Strain A2 was used in this study due to its ability to efficiently oxidize (i.e. ~100 μM h−1 per 107 cells) and tolerate a high concentration (10 mM) of As(III). This strain was recently isolated from mine tailings highly contaminated with As and antimony (1.2 and 2.3 g kg−1, respectively) (8).
Strain A2 was grown in the absence (control) or presence of 10 mM As(III) (added as NaAsO2) with yeast extract (0.002% [wt/vol]) as a carbon source, and As(III) oxidation was monitored as previously described (8). As shown in Fig. 1A, arsenite oxidation was observed after the culture reached the early-stationary phase with a cell density of ~3.0 × 107 cells mL−1 and 85% of added As(III) was oxidized to As(V) within 72 h. The growth of strain A2 was not inhibited in the presence of 10 mM As(III), which confirmed its ability to tolerate a high concentration of As(III).
Fig. 1.
(A) Growth curve and As(III) oxidation profiles of Sinorhizobium sp. strain A2 grown in the absence (filled circle) or presence (open circle) of 10 mM As(III). Arsenite oxidation to As(V) is shown in the white column and abiotic control with 10 mM As(III) is shown in the black column as % of As(V) to total As. Each value represents the mean ± standard error of two independent experiments. The arrow indicates the time when cells were harvested for the proteome analysis. (B) Comparison of aioA gene expression levels during growth in the absence (control) or presence of As(III). Copy numbers of aioA transcripts were normalized by copy numbers of 16S rRNA. Error bars indicate the standard deviation of mean values (n=3) from triplicate cultures, with each being obtained from triplicate qPCR technical replicates.
Strain A2 was previously shown to possess the arsenite oxidase gene (aioA) (8), which encodes a protein sharing 99.4% amino acid identity with AioA from the facultative chemolithotrophic As(III)-oxidizing α-Proteobacteria, Ancylobacter dichloromethanicus (1). In order to examine the expression pattern of aioA in the strain A2, qRT-PCR was performed using cells grown with or without 10 mM As(III) and harvested after 24, 48, and 120 h (in triplicate). Total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA) followed by a DNase treatment as described previously (9). In qRT-PCR, 25 ng of total RNA was reverse-transcribed, then qPCR was performed in triplicate for each RNA sample using the CFX96 real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad) as described previously (19). The bacterial and prokaryote universal primers Bact1369-F and Prok1492-R (26) were used to detect the 16S rRNA gene, while aoxB1-2F and aoxBM2-1R primers were used for the aioA gene (21). A qRT-PCR analysis of aioA transcripts (Fig. 1B) showed that aioA gene expression levels were elevated during the late-log and early-stationary phases (24 and 48 h), concomitant with the oxidation of As(III) observed after 24 h (Fig. 1A). The relative expression of the aioA gene markedly decreased after 120 h, ~2 d after most of the added As(III) had already been oxidized to As(V). In the absence of As(III), no substantial aioA gene expression was detected throughout the incubation period (up to 120 h). This result contradicted the case of the As(III)-oxidizing Agrobacterium tumefaciens str. 5A, in that aioAB gene expression was also observed in the absence of As(III) when A. tumefaciens str. 5A cells were in the late-log phase and stationary phase (15). These findings suggested that the aioAB genes in A. tumefaciens str. 5A were regulated not only by As(III) exposure, but also a quorum-sensing-based response as a second regulatory circuit (15). Although Sinorhizobium sp. strain A2 is phylogenetically closely related to Agrobacterium (95.7% 16S rRNA sequence identity), these two organisms appear to employ distinct regulatory systems for the oxidation of As(III).
In an attempt to gain further insights into the global cellular response of strain A2 to As(III) exposure, a proteome analysis was conducted to identify strongly induced proteins under As(III)-oxidizing conditions. Whole-cell lysates were prepared from cells grown to the early-stationary phase (48 h) in the absence (control) or presence of 10 mM As(III) (the average cell numbers at the time of harvesting were 5.4 × 108 ± 4.8 × 107 and 5.2 × 108 ± 7.6 × 106, respectively), separated by 2D-PAGE gels, and the proteins that were strongly expressed in the presence of As(III) were further analyzed by LC-MS/MS (See Supplemental material for detailed methods).
Among the up-regulated proteins identified in 2D gels (Fig. 2), a large subunit of arsenite oxidase, AioA, was more abundantly expressed in As(III)-oxidizing cells (5.7-fold change) than in the control (Table 1). The absence of AioB, a small subunit containing the Rieske 2Fe-2S cluster, may have been due to the limited numbers of peptides analyzed or limited resolution of the periplasmic proteins often eliminated with cell debris during sample preparation. A previous proteomic study on As(III)-oxidizing Rhizobium sp. NT-26 also detected AioA, but not AioB peptides, while aioA and aioB genes were both expressed in the presence of As(III) (2). Conversely, neither AioA nor AioB peptides were detected by a proteome analysis of the As(III)-oxidizing β-proteobacterial organotroph, Herminiimonas arsenicoxydans, and this was likely attributed to the insufficient amount of Aio peptides in these cells (28). This study confirmed, for the first time, the preferential accumulation of AioA within organotrophic As(III)-oxidizing bacteria, as shown with the chemolithoautotrophic As(III)-oxidizing Rhizobium sp. NT-26 (2).
Fig. 2.
(A) 2D-PAGE proteome maps of proteins differentially expressed in response to As(III). (B) Enlarged images of the protein spots identified in (A). Arrows indicate the proteins accumulated in the presence of As(III), which were further analyzed by LC-MS/MS (Table 1). The number of each spot corresponds to Table 1.
Table 1.
List of proteins differentially expressed in Sinorhizobium sp. strain A2 in the presence of 10 mM As(III)
| Spot no. | Protein description | Gene name | NCBI accession no. | Coverage (%) | No. of identified peptides | Fold inductiona | ANOVA p-valueb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arsenite oxidase large subunit | aioA | ADO95186 | 8.1 | 8 | 5.7 | 0.038 |
| 2 | Isocitrate lyase | aceA | YP_005718903 | 33.8 | 16 | 3.5 | 0.001 |
| 3 | Isocitrate lyase | aceA | YP_005718903 | 27.7 | 6 | 2.7 | 0.003 |
| 4 | Hypothetical protein SMc02703 | NP_386471 | 7.7 | 2 | 2.1 | 0.017 | |
| 5 | Protein tyrosine phosphatase | EHK74782 | 22.8 | 5 | 4.4 | 0.002 |
Fold changes in protein abundances between As(III)-oxidizing cells and control.
Significance was assessed by a one-way ANOVA.
Proteomic evidence also indicated the induction of the ars operon in As(III)-oxidizing cells. The expression of the ars operon was previously shown to be induced by As(III) and As(V) (14), and the ars system may also protect cells from the toxicity of As(V) accumulating during the oxidation of As(III). The protein tyrosine phosphatase (TPT) was over-produced (4.4-fold) in cells with As(III) (Table 1). The gene encoding TPT in Sinorhizobium spp. (e.g. S. meliloti and S. medicae) is located within the ars operon adjacent to arsC, which encodes arsenate reductase (Fig. 3). Although the specific function of TPT in the metabolism of As currently remains unclear, TPT may be expressed in an operon-coordinated manner. The ArsC and ArsH proteins encoded in the ars operon were exclusively detected in As(III)-oxidizing cells by a 1D-LC-MS/MS analysis (supplemental methods and Table S1), and the expression of acr3, a gene coding for the As(III) efflux pump located within the ars operon, as well as arsC was also confirmed by RT-PCR (Fig. S1). These results demonstrated the induction of As-specific resistance mechanisms, the Aio and ars systems, in As(III)-oxidizing strain A2 cells. Cells under As(III) stress may require additional energy for these resistance mechanisms. Since strain A2 grew indifferently in the presence or absence of As(III) (Fig. 1A), this strain may gain some energy via the oxidation of As(III); however, we previously failed to demonstrate chemolithoautotrophic growth with As(III) (8). Alternatively, cells under As(III) stress may induce proteins involved in energy production because the up-regulation of proteins involved in oxidative phosphorylation has been reported in As(III)-exposed H. arsenicoxydans (28).
Fig. 3.
Schematic overview of metabolic adaptation associated with As(III)-oxidation in Sinorhizobium sp. strain A2. Proteins and genes encoding proteins that were detected in As(III)-oxidizing cells are shown in a gray background and bold faces, respectively. The physical map of the ars operon was adapted from the genome of Sinorhizobium medicae WSM419 (NC_009621).
An isocitrate lyase (ICL) associated with the glyoxylate pathway in central metabolism was induced by 3.5-fold under As(III)-oxidizing conditions (Fig. 2 and Table 1). The induction of ICL was also previously observed in the chemoorganotrophic As(III)-oxidizing Thiomonas sp. 3As (4) and Rhodococcus strain (13), as well as in superoxide-stressed E. coli (23). The toxicity of As is known to involve the generation of ROS (7). ROS disrupt proteins containing Fe-S clusters, such as fumarase and succinate dehydrogenase, in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle (Fig. 3). Consequently, a carbon metabolic shift to the glyoxylate pathway enables the metabolism of citrate via the modified TCA cycle in order to compensate for the enzymes damaged by ROS (23). ROS is also generated via the oxidation of NADH during aerobic respiration. Since the glyoxylate pathway does not produce NADH, the metabolic shift from the TCA cycle to glyoxylate pathway reduces the amount of NADH produced, and, thus, may reduce oxidative stress (17, 23). The adaptability of central metabolism may be a common mechanism used by organotrophic bacteria to mitigate ROS stress.
Our results indicated that the success of Sinorhizobium sp. strain A2 as an efficient As(III)-oxidizer lay in its ability to overcome the deleterious effects of As toxicity by combined strategies: i) As-specific detoxification pathways (aio and ars systems), and ii) the remodulation of central metabolic pathways to protect against indirect As toxicity and oxidative stress (Fig. 3). Since strain A2 was cultivated from highly contaminated soil with multiple toxic heavy metals (i.e. As, antimony, and chromium; 8), metabolic adaptations in order to mitigate oxidative damage may provide physiological advantages for surviving under complex contaminant environments. The ars and aio operons are carried by a plasmid in the other α-proteobacterial As(III)-oxidizers Rhizobium sp. NT26 (2) and Sinorhizobium sp. M14 (6), and the plasmid was shown to be responsible for oxidation of As(III) and tolerance of heavy metals (Co, Cd, and Zn) (6). The acquisition of As-oxidizing ability along with ars and other heavy metal resistance genes via a plasmid may explain the common As-specific response observed among the phylogenetically related Rhizobium-Sinorhizobium-Agrobacterium members of α-Proteobacteria. Conversely, other distinct regulatory mechanisms to cope with As toxicity may have developed independently as a result of their adaptation to specific ecophysiological niches.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by funding for the NEXT program (GS023) to NH from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. We thank Ms. Kumiko Chatani for her technical assistance.
Footnotes
Supplemental material is available online.
References
- 1.Andreoni V, Zanchi R, Cavalca L, Corsini A, Romagnoli C, Canzi E. Arsenite oxidation in Ancylobacter dichloromethanicus As3-1b strain: detection of genes involved in arsenite oxidation and CO2 fixation. Curr Microbiol. 2012;65:212–218. doi: 10.1007/s00284-012-0149-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Andres J, Arsene-Ploetze F, Barbe V, et al. Life in an arsenic-containing gold mine: genome and physiology of the autotrophic arsenite-oxidizing bacterium Rhizobium sp. NT-26. Genome Biol Evol. 2013;5:934–953. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evt061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bahar M, Megharaj M, Naidu R. Arsenic bioremediation potential of a new arsenite-oxidizing bacterium Stenotrophomonas sp. MM-7 isolated from soil. Biodegradation. 2012;23:803–812. doi: 10.1007/s10532-012-9567-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bryan C, Marchal M, Battaglia-Brunet F, Kugler V, Lemaitre-Guillier C, Lievremont D, Bertin P, Arsene-Ploetze F. Carbon and arsenic metabolism in Thiomonas strains: differences revealed diverse adaptation processes. BMC Microbiol. 2009;9:127. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-9-127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cai L, Liu G, Rensing C, Wang G. Genes involved in arsenic transformation and resistance associated with different levels of arsenic-contaminated soils. BMC Microbiol. 2009;9:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-9-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Drewniak L, Dziewit L, Ciezkowska M, Gawor J, Gromadka R, Sklodowska A. Structural and functional genomics of plasmid pSinA of Sinorhizobium sp. M14 encoding genes for the arsenite oxidation and arsenic resistance. J Biotechnol. 2013;164:479–488. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2013.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Flora SJS. Arsenic-induced oxidative stress and its reversibility. Free Radical Biol Medicine. 2011;51:257–281. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hamamura N, Fukushima K, Itai T. Identification of antimony- and arsenic-oxidizing bacteria associated with antimony mine tailing. Microbes Environ. 2013;28:257–263. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME12217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hamamura N, Meneghin J, Reysenbach A-L. Comparative community gene expression analysis of Aquificales-dominated geothermal springs. Environ Microbiol. 2013;15:1226–1237. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Imlay JA. Cellular defenses against superoxide and hydrogen peroxide. Annu Rev Biochem. 2008;77:755–776. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.061606.161055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Inskeep WP, Macur RE, Hamamura N, Warelow TP, Ward SA, Santini JM. Detection, diversity and expression of aerobic bacterial arsenite oxidase genes. Environ Microbiol. 2007;9:934–943. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01215.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jackson CR, Dugas SL. Phylogenetic analysis of bacterial and archaeal arsC gene sequences suggests an ancient, common origin for arsenate reductase. BMC Evol Biol. 2003;3:18–27. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-3-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jain R, Adhikary H, Jha S, Jha A, Kumar GN. Remodulation of central carbon metabolic pathway in response to arsenite exposure in Rhodococcus sp. strain NAU-1. Microbial Biotechnol. 2012;5:764–772. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2012.00368.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ji G, Garber EAE, Armes LG, Chen C, Fuchs JA, Silver S. Arsenate reductase of Staphylococcus aureus plasmid pI258. Biochem. 1994;33:7294–7299. doi: 10.1021/bi00189a034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kashyap DR, Botero LM, Franck WL, Hassett DJ, McDermott TR. Complex regulation of arsenite oxidation in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J Bacteriol. 2006;188:1081–1088. doi: 10.1128/JB.188.3.1081-1088.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kitchin KT. Arsenic’s interactions with macromolecules and its relationship to carcinogenesis. In: Sun H, editor. Biological Chemistry of Arenic, Antimony and Bismuth. John Wiley & Suns Ltd; West Sussex, UK: 2011. pp. 19–51. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lemire J, Mailloux R, Auger C, Whalen D, Appanna VD. Pseudomonas fluorescens orchestrates a fine metabolic-balancing act to counter aluminium toxicity. Environ Microbiol. 2010;12:1384–1390. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02200.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Liu SX, Athar M, Lippai I, Waldren C, Hei TK. Induction of oxyradicals by arsenic: Implication for mechanism of genotoxicity. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2001;98:1643–1648. doi: 10.1073/pnas.031482998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mitsunobu S, Hamamura N, Kataoka T, Shiraishi F. Arsenic attenuation in geothermal streamwater coupled with biogenic arsenic(III) oxidation. Appl Geochem. 2013;35:154–160. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Quemeneur M, Heinrich-Salmeron A, Muller D, Lievremont D, Jauzein M, Bertin PN, Garrido F, Joulian C. Diversity surveys and evolutionary relationships of aoxB Genes in aerobic arsenite-oxidizing bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:4567–4573. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02851-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Quemeneur M, Cebron A, Billard P, Battaglia-Brunet F, Garrido F, Leyval C, Joulian C. Population structure and abundance of arsenite-oxidizing bacteria along an arsenic pollution gradient in waters of the Upper Isle River Basin, France. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:4566–4570. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03104-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rossman TG, Klein CB. Genetic toxicology of arsenic and antimony. In: Sun H, editor. Biological Chemistry of Arsenic, Antimony and Bismuth. Wiley; West Sussex, UK: 2011. pp. 331–351. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rui B, Shen T, Zhou H, et al. A systematic investigation of Escherichia coli central carbon metabolism in response to superoxide stress. BMC Syst Biol. 2010;4:122. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-4-122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Silver S, Phung LT. Genes and enzymes involved in bacterial oxidation and reduction of inorganic arsenic. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:599–608. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.2.599-608.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Stolz JF, Basu P, Oremland RS. Microbial arsenic metabolism: new twists on an old poison. Microbe. 2010;5:53–59. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Suzuki MT, Taylor LT, Delong EF. Quantitative analysis of small-subunit rRNA genes in mixed microbial populations via 5′-nuclease assays. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:4605–4614. doi: 10.1128/aem.66.11.4605-4614.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tamaki S, Frankenberger WT., Jr Environmental biochemistry of arsenic. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 1992;124:79–110. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-2864-6_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Weiss S, Carapito C, Cleiss J, et al. Enhanced structural and functional genome elucidation of the arsenite-oxidizing strain Herminiimonas arsenicoxydans by proteomics data. Biochimie. 2009;91:192–203. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2008.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



