Skip to main content
PMC home page
SpringerPlus logoLink to SpringerPlus
. 2015 Dec 12;4:769. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1541-2

A cross sectional study: the knowledge, attitude, perception, misconception and views (KAPMV) of adult family members of people living with human immune virus-HIV acquired immune deficiency syndrome-AIDS (PLWHA)

Akshaya Srikanth Bhagavathula 1,✉, Deepak Kumar Bandari 2, Asim Ahmad Elnour 3, Akram Ahmad 4, Muhammad Umair Khan 4, Mohamed Baraka 5, Farah Hamad 6, Abdulla Shehab 7
PMCID: PMC4676772  PMID: 26688783

Abstract

We intended to assess knowledge, attitude, perception, misconception and views (KAP-MV) of family members of PLWHA. A cross-sectional retrospective study conducted in Anti-retroviral centre of Mahatma Gandhi Memorial—MGM hospital, Warangal, Telangana, South-India from July to September 2014. A questionnaire containing 41 items was distributed among adult family members accompanying patients living with HIV/AIDS-PLWHA. Level of KAP-MV was categorized into poor (0–28), average (29–55) and good (56–82). Analysis was performed by Pearson’s Chi square, analysis of variance and Spearman’s correlation test on 41 variables using SPSS version 21 and p < 0.01. 538 questionnaires were distributed, response rate was (96 %). On knowledge scale, respondents had a mean score of 8.0 ± 1.7, attitude 5.8 ± 3.4, perception 23.4 ± 4.1, misconceptions 8.0 ± 2.1 and views 8.0 ± 3.9. The respondents mean score was 53.2 ± 9.1 (64.9 %). Overall, level of education, marital status, religious beliefs, and employment status has significant (p < 0.001) associations with KAP-MV. Knowledge was significantly correlated with respondents’ attitude (r = −0.15, p < 0.001), perception (0.39; p < 0.001), and views (0.381; p < 0.001). Family members of PLWHA with less knowledge score had more negative attitude, perception and views. Level of education, marital status, religious beliefs and employment status were identified as key barriers. Interventions targeting family members of PLWHA are warranted. Practice implications are as follows:

  • Encourage role of family members.

  • Deploy interventions.

  • Minimize barriers.

  • Change misconceptions.

Keywords: People living with human immune virus (HIV) acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS)—PLWHA, PLWHA adult family member, AIDS, HIV, Knowledge attitude perception misconception views (KAP-MV)

Background

Verging on forth decade of acquired immune deficiency syndrome-AIDS epidemics, India ranks the third largest human immune virus (HIV) epidemics in the world (National AIDS Control Organization, Department of AIDS Control 2012). In line with National Control Organization (NACO) for AIDS the burden of HIV infected people in India was estimated to be 2.1 million in 2013, (National AIDS Control Organization, Department of AIDS Control 2012). Among the highest prevalence states, Andhra Pradesh accounts for 0.90 % of HIV prevalence followed by Karnataka (0.63 %) and accounts for 53 % of all the HIV/AIDS infected people from south India, (Dandona et al. 2013). Warangal (now in Telangana state) was recorded as the most HIV/AIDS prevalent district in Andhra Pradesh, (Joshua et al. 2011).

Family members of people living with human immune virus-AIDS (PLWHA) directly or indirectly face embarrassment, shame, ostracism and stigma from the community, (Vlassoff et al. 2012). Furthermore, these situations are complicated especially in socio-cultural and traditional community, (Mawar et al. 2005). A study reported that PLWHA individuals and their families were socially isolated and were blamed by the communities in India, (Pallikadavath et al. 2005). These factors impede timely helpseeking with strong bonds between PLWHA and their families to care and support. In addition, the existing evidence of 28 studies (18 of which in Sub-Saharan Africa) as reported in a literature review supports the role of the family members as key predictors in providing care and support for the well-being of PLWHA (Liyun and Li 2013).

Adult family members are the solo responsible individuals caring for PLWHA apart from health professionals. Adult family members are more likely to become the principle caregivers for PLWHA at homes. In addition, emphasis for well-being of PLWHA demonstrated by growing evidence related to the outcomes of family caregivers.

Knowledge, attitude, and practice towards HIV/AIDS vary and have widespread misconceptions including fear of infection transmission, social stigma and personal fear within the family members, (Feng et al. 2009). This is even more so for India, where the impact of HIV/AIDS radiates from an infected person to the whole family. Due to existing discrimination in the society against PLWHA, knowledge, attitude, perception, misconception and views of the family members is less often studied than other individuals. India’s National Family Health Survey-3 (NFHS-3) 2007, reported only 17 % of the women and 33 % of the men had a comprehensive knowledge about HIV prevention and transmission, (International Institute for Population Sciences 2005).

Nevertheless, NFHS-3 data included sample from the general population from rural and tribal areas of India. However, some studies focus on the knowledge, attitudes, and practice of the HIV/AIDS in the general population, health professionals and students, (Meera et al. 2013; Kermode et al. 2005; Shankar et al. 2011). While other studies focus on gendered dimension, stigma, care givers burden and stress, (Bharat et al. 2014; Jeyaseelan et al. 2013; Krishna et al. 2005). However, these studies have been limited to assessing integrated knowledge, attitudes, perception, misconception and views (KAP-MV) of adult family members of PLWHA. Few studies have examined potential differences in knowledge, attitude, risk perception, misconception and adult family member views towards HIV/AIDS and PLWHA.

The evaluation of PLWHA adult family member’s KAP-MV is crucial to tailor the home care, prevention measures to halt transmission and effective interventions for PLWHA. Therefore, having accurate knowledge about HIV/AIDS is important to reduce misconceptions, and to create a more humanitarian attitude and compassionate response of PLWHA families towards HIV/AIDS. To our knowledge, the current study is the first of its kind to make an indepth assessment of integrated KAP-MV of adult family members towards PLWHA in high prevalent Warangal district, Telangana state of South-Central India.

Ethical approval

The study protocol was approved by Institutional ethical committee of the Mahatma Gandhi Memorial (MGM) institute of Medical Sciences, Warangal, Telangana state.

Aim

We intended to assess the knowledge, attitude, perception, misconception and views (KAP-MV) of adult family members of PLWHA in South India. The study aim was to delineate the predictors that affect adult family member’s KAP-MV.

Objectives

We have objectively assessed the KAP-MV of adult family members within a cohort of HIV/AIDS positive patients. The assessment of general knowledge has identified the level of understanding of adult family members towards HIV/AIDS, attitudes have addressed their feelings, perceptions have addressed the possible causes of HIV/AIDS, misconception have investigated their ideas towards certain myth about PLWHA and views examined certain daily contact activity of measures to prevent HIV transmissions.

Methods

Study design and setting

A cross-sectional survey was conducted using self-administered questionnaire ("Appendix") among adult family members accompanying PLWHA in anti-retroviral centre of MGM hospital, Warangal-Telangana, South-India. This hospital is 1200 bedded multidisciplinary tertiary care government teaching hospital. Warangal district had a population of 3.58 million in the 2011 census, (Registrar General of India 2011).

Study population

The population was composed of all adult visitors accompanying patients with HIV/AIDS visiting the main hospital. PLWHA adult family members were informed about the study prior to their participation. Those who agreed to participate were consented.

Sample size and sample selection

An online sample size calculator “Creative research systems” (Accessed June 2014), was used to determine the number of participants for the survey, by considering 95 % confidence level, with a accuracy of 50 % for the population size of 135,000 antiretroviral therapy (ART) registered patients given a confidential interval of 4.2, the recommended sample size is 542. A systematic random sampling technique was used to select PLWHA family members that includes spouse, parents, siblings, or any of blood relations, presenting with registered ART patients attending ART specialized regional center on each day of data collection. The average attendance at the ART regional center on each month in the last 6 months served as a sample frame of 2197 and by dividing this population by the sample size of 542 in cohort, one out of every four PLWHA attending with family members were selected. One from each adult PLWHA family members were selected to align with the sample representation and obtain diverse opinion from a wide range from them. Further, the research assistants has cross-checked each new client to ensure that no PLWHA family members were selected twice.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria included been an adult family member of PLWHA, aged more than 18 years, both gender and willing to provide written consent. The healthcare providers, social caregivers, family member children’s (less than 18 years), not willing to participate and not able to provide written consent were all excluded from the study.

Study survey instrument (KAP-MV)

We have developed structured study survey-questionnaire which was self-administered to collect socio-demographics and the five domains outcome measures (KAP-MV). The questionnaire items used in this study was based on the World Health Organization (WHO) AIDS program knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and practices (KABP) survey in 1990, (World Health Organization 1990).

KAP-MV survey contents

The questionnaire comprises of 50 closed questions with a dichotomous responses (Yes/No). It was divided into six parts. Part A related to respondent’s socio-demographic background (9 items), Part B was relevant to knowledge regarding HIV/AIDS (5 statements), Part C on risk perception towards possible causes of HIV/AIDS (12 statements), Part D on AIDS attitude scale (5 statements), Part E on respondents views about measure to prevent HIV transmissions (12 statements) and Part F on misconceptions towards HIV/AIDS (5 statements).

KAP-MV survey validation and reliability

All the questions were translated from English to Telugu (back and forward method) by expert faculty members (number of 6). The Telugu version was used for the study participants. The questionnaire was tested for reliability, psychometric and internal validity. The internal consistency estimate of reliability of test scores (Cronbach’s Alfa) was found to be 0.76 indicating a good construct of KAP-MV. Furthermore, KAP-MV was piloted and post piloting phase the questionnaire was modified to meet the compatibility of local settings and suit the study participants. The results of the piloting phase were not included herein. The questionnaires were completed in the waiting room and took an average of 30 min to complete. The completed questionnaires were collected and retrieved by one investigator [DKB] on daily bases from July to September 2014.

KAP-MV survey outlines

Knowledge domain

This domain asked adult family members their basic knowledge about HIV/AIDS as to the meaning of AIDS abbreviation, whether AIDS is a transmittable, hereditary, cured or amendable to vaccine.

Attitudes domain: address feelings

The attitudes domain inquire about the feelings of adult family members towards been comfortable talking with PLWHA, feel comfortable working with them, living with them, feel empathy towards AIDS patients and PLWHA deserve free treatment.

Perception domain: towards causes of HIV/AIDS

We cited 14 items to address the perception of adult family members of PLWHA towards the causes of HIV/AIDS. The perception of participants towards causes of HIV/AIDS, ("Appendix").

Misconception domain: myths about HIV/AIDS

The KAP-MV has examined the misconception of adult family members of PLWHA about their respective infective beloved patients. The following were the addressed statements of misconception: love is a reason for HIV/AIDS, AIDS is a punishment from GOD, AIDS can be treated by holy water, AIDS do not come after marriage and AIDS can be transmitted by a cough.

Views domain: about measures to prevent HIV/AIDS transmission

We have addressed the views of adult family members of PLWHA about measures to prevent HIV/AIDS transmission. This has included the followings: avoiding sharing needles and syringes, having sex with only one faithful, uninfected partner, using condoms during sexual intercourse, treating sexual transmitted diseases (STDs) promptly, screening donated blood before transfusion, not sharing toilets with an infected person, not sharing food with an infected person, isolating people living with HIV/AIDS, do not stay with infected person on same house, do not have casual contact with infected person and avoid mosquito bites for HIV transmission.

KAP-MV scoring

The scoring mechanism of each section was developed by the researchers. For all the 41 statements (excluding socio-demographics), each correct answer was given a score of 2 while each wrong answer was given a score of 0. Therefore, a respondent could score a maximum of 82 and a minimum of 0 in all sections of questionnaire. Hence, the total score of KAP-MV has ranged from 0 to 82. The higher the score, the better were the respondent’s HIV/AIDS related KAP-MV and less misconception. The overall scores were also categorized into poor (0–28), average (29–55) and good (56–82).

KAP-MV procedure

The questionnaire was administered while the adult family members of PLWHA were in the waiting room after explaining nature and anonymity of the survey, and assuring confidentiality of the personal responses. The survey was conducted during the regular ART centre working hours. Participants were provided with pens and were asked to sit apart and were asked not to communicate with each others during administration of the questionnaire so as to encourage spontaneous and honest responses.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis were carried out by SPSS (version 21), which includes frequency count and percentages for socio-demographic variables, Pearson’s Chi square, analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) and Spearman’s rank order correlation (rho) test was conducted on 41 variables towards KAP-MV reported by families of PLWHA. A p value of <0.01 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The ART regimen was constituted of combination of Nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) Zidovudine, Lamivudine and Stavuidine (three types) and nonnucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) Nevirapine and Efavarinz (two types) as ART medications.

Respondents’ socio-demographic profile

Among 536 respondents, 515 (96 %) respondents have answered the questionnaire, of which 343 (66.6 %) were males and 172 (33.4 %) were females, ranging from 18 to 60 years [35 ± 3.4 years]. More than half of respondents (55.1 %) were 18–24 years of age, had attained the level of higher educational degree or above (63.9 %), and single (59.6 %). More than half of respondents (58.4 %) were students, and have faithfully believed in God the Almighty (78.3 %). The mean income was 25,000 ± 2000 (range 20,000–30,000) Indian Rubies-INR and mean number of adult family members living at home with their PLWHIA was 4.5 ± 1.3. The characteristics of the respondents were presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

The respondents demographics and characteristics (n = 515)

Number Percentage
Gender
 Male 343 66.6
 Female 172 33.4
Age
 18–24 284 55.1
 25–34 122 23.7
 35–44 82 15.9
 45–60 27 5.2
Educational level
 Illiterate 29 5.6
 Primary school 53 10.3
 High school 53 10.3
 Secondary 51 9.9
 Higher degree 329 63.9
Marital
 Single 307 59.6
 Married 186 36.1
 Widow 16 3.1
 Separated 6 1.2
Employer
 Student 301 58.4
 Housewife 84 16.3
 Employer 93 18.1
 Unemployed 32 6.2
 Retired 5 1
Religion
 Hindu 266 51.7
 Christian 28 5.4
 Muslim 39 7.6
 Others 182 35.3
Belief
 Yes 403 78.3
 No 68 13.2
 Unsure 44 8.5
Family
 1–3 177 34.4
 4–5 232 45
 >equal 6 106 20.6
Income
 <20,000 199 38.6
 <30,000 283 55
 >30,000 33 6.4
Open in a new tab

Respondents’ knowledge towards HIV/AIDS

Total scores of KAP-MV

The total mean scores of the study sample on respondent’s knowledge, attitude, perception, views and misconception (KAP-MV score) was found to be 64.9 ± 9.1. Which was categorized good (reference ranging from 56 to 82). Table 2 shows adult family members knowledge towards basic information about HIV/AIDS. The knowledge score can range between 0 and 10 and the mean knowledge score was found to be 8.0 ± 1.7. The vast majority of respondents have had right knowledge about the abbreviation of AIDS (61.4 %), AIDS is a transmittable disease (94.2 %), AIDS is a hereditary disease (87.2 %), AIDS is a curable disease (88.2 %) and that there is a vaccine for AIDS (92.2 %).

Table 2.

Respondents knowledge and attitude about HIV/AIDS in Warangal, South India (n = 515)

Variables Correct answer Correct answers (%) Wrong answers (%) Mean ± standard deviation
General knowledge
1. AIDS abbreviation Acquired Immunodeficiency Virus 316 (61.4)a 199 (38.6) 8.01 ± 1.76
2. AIDS a transmittable disease Yes 485 (94.2) 30 (5.8)
3. AIDS a hereditary disease No 449 (87.2) 66 (12.8)
4. AIDS cured at this moment No 454 (88.2) 61 (11.8)
5. There is a vaccine for AIDS No 475 (92.2) 40 (7.8)
Attitudes
6. Feel comfortable talking with AIDS patients Yes 277 (53.8) 238 (46.2) 5.80 ± 3.47
7. Feel comfortable working with AIDS patients Yes 275 (53.4) 240 (46.6)
8. Living with AIDS patients in same house Yes 266 (51.7)a 249 (48.3)
9. Feel empathy towards AIDS patients Yes 282 (54.8) 233 (45.2)
10. AIDS patients deserve free treatment Yes 394 (76.5) 121 (23.5)
Perception
11. Sexual intercourse without a condom with HIV-infected person Yes 469 (91.1) 46 (8.9) 23.44 ± 4.19
12. Sharing needle with HIV-infected organ Yes 499 (96.9) 16 (3.1)
13. Transfusion of HIV-infected blood or receiving HIV-infected organ Yes 498 (96.7) 17 (3.3)
14. Having sex with multiple sexual partners with unknown HIV status Yes 484 (94.0) 31 (6.0)
15. From an HIV positive mother to her fetus Yes 479 (93.0) 36 (7.0)
16. Sharing personal items such as shaving blades Yes 438 (85.0) 77 (15.0)
17. Breast Feeding from a HIV-infected mother Yes 410 (79.6) 105 (20.4)
18. Having tattoo or body piercing No 337 (65.4) 178 (34.6)
19. Kissing can transmit HIV-infection No 147 (28.5)a 368 (71.5)
20. Mosquito bites No 460 (89.3) 55 (10.7)
21. Sharing/eating a meal with an HIV-infected person No 452 (87.8) 63 (12.2)
22. Sharing water or drinks with an HIV-infected person No 465 (90.3) 50 (9.7)
23. Using Public toilets No 470 (91.3) 45 (8.7)
24. Casual contacts (hugging or touching) with an HIV-infected person No 427 (82.9)a 88 (17.1)
Open in a new tab

aMost wrongly answered

Attitudes

The adult family members’ feeling towards PLWHA was presented in Table 2. The attitude score can range between 0 and 10 and the mean attitude score was found to be 5.8 ± 3.4. Slightly above half of respondents feel comfortable talking with their PLWHA. Slightly less than this percent feel comfortable working with PLWHA. Slightly more than half 266 (51.7 %) of the respondents, indicated that they would be able to live in the same house with a person having HIV/AIDS. However, 282 (54.8 %) of the respondents declared that they feel empathy towards PLWHA. A higher than two-third of respondents indicated that PLWHA deserve free treatment, [Table 2].

Perception towards possible causes of HIV infection

The sum of perception scores can range between 0 and 28 and respondents overall mean score in this domain was 23.4 ± 4.1. The analyses of data have shown that in most statements concerning perception and beliefs about the possible causes of HIV infections, the majority of respondents had good positive perception regarding HIV causes. However, some questions showed less perception towards causes of HIV/AIDS transmission. For example, only 337 (65.4 %) and 147 (28.5 %) knew that kissing and tattoos cannot transmit HIV-infections, respectively, [Table 2].

Respondent’s views about measures to prevent HIV infection

Overall respondent views towards preventing HIV transmission mean score was 21.0 ± 3.9 (reference range from 0 to 24). Generally, the views of adult family members were highly regarded as good towards certain issues concerning PLWHA and HIV/AIDS as a transmitted disease. For instance when respondents were asked that they avoid taking illicit drugs/use of intravenous drugs, avoiding sharing needles and syringes, having sex with only one faithful uninfected partner, using condoms during sexual intercourse and treating sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) promptly with more than 90 % had have answered correctly. On the other hand less than 90 % but more than 80 % responded correctly to the followings: screening donated blood before transfusion, not sharing food with an infected person, do not stay with infected person on same house and do not have casual contact with infected person. Furthermore, less than 80 % and over 70 % of respondents have shown correct answers to preventive measures as not sharing toilets with an infected person, isolating people living with HIV/AIDS (negatively worded) and avoid mosquito bites for HIV transmission, [Table 2].

Respondent’s misconception about HIV/AIDS

The majority of the respondents had less misconception about HIV/AIDS, with 65–90 % correctly answering the five statements. However, many misconceptions were still noted relating to HIV/AIDS, with 34.6 % of respondents believing that love could be a reason for HIV/AIDS and 27.6 % believing that AIDS is a punishment from the God, [Table 2].

Correlation analysis for outcome variables

The results shown in Table 3 demonstrated the Spearman’s (r) rank order correlation (rho) and the associations of variables with each other. Mean knowledge score was significantly associated with level of education (p < 0.001) and religion (p < 0.001). Knowledge was significantly correlated with attitude (r = −0.15, p < 0.001), views (0.381; p < 0.001), perceptions (0.39; p < 0.001) and total KAP-MV (0.43; p < 0.001) towards HIV/AIDS. Adult family members of PLWHA with less knowledge score had more negative attitude, perception and views towards preventing HIV infections. Furthermore, misconceptions were highly associated with PLWHA families with negative views (0.337; p < 0.001) and less perceptions (0.201; p < 0.001). Age, level of education, marital status, religion status and religious beliefs were significantly associated with most attitude scores, (p < 0.001) and were minimally associated with respondents perception about HIV/AIDS, (p < 0.001). Results have revealed that all the sociodemographic variables were significantly associated with respondents’ views, (p < 0.001). Religious status (p < 0.001) was significantly associated with respondents’ misconceptions. The results of the correlations were illustrated in Table 3.

Table 3.

Respondents views and misconceptions about HIV/AIDS (n = 515)

Variables Correct answer Correct answers (%) Wrong answers (%) Mean ± standard deviation
Respondents views
25. Avoid taking illicit drugs/use of intravenous drugs Yes 477 (92.6) 38 (7.4) 21.00 ± 3.98
26. By avoiding sharing needles and syringes Yes 501 (97.3) 14 (2.7)
27. Having sex with only one faithful, uninfected partner Yes 494 (95.9) 21 (4.1)
28. Using condoms during sexual intercourse Yes 491 (95.3) 24 (4.7)
29. Treating STDs promptly Yes 480 (93.2) 35 (6.8)
30. Screening donated blood before transfusion Yes 463 (89.9) 52 (10.1)
31. Not sharing toilets with an infected person No 411 (79.8) 104 (20.2)
32. Not sharing food with an infected person No 431 (83.7) 84 (16.3)
33. Isolating people living with HIV/AIDS No 367 (71.3)a 149 (28.7)
34. Do not stay with infected person on same house No 448 (87.0) 67 (13.0)
35. Do not have casual contact with infected person No 439 (85.2) 76 (14.8)
36. Avoid mosquito bites for HIV transmission No 406 (78.8) 109 (21.2)
Misconceptions
37. Love is a reason for HIV/AIDS No 337 (65.4)a 178 (34.6) 8.03 ± 2.19
38. AIDS is a punishment of God No 373 (72.4) 142 (27.6)
39. AIDS can treat by holy water No 442 (85.8) 73 (14.2)
40. AIDS do not come after marriage No 454 (88.2) 61 (11.8)
41. AIDS can be transmitted by the cough No 461 (89.5) 54 (10.5)
Open in a new tab

aMost wrongly answered

Discussions

The main finding of the current study was the satisfactory outcome of the KAP-MV survey in term of evaluating the adult family member basic knowledge, attitude, perception, misconception and views of their beloved PLWHA. We have used a multiple component questionnaire with diverse domains to the level of understanding of adult family members towards HIV/AIDS, feelings, perception about possible causes of HIV/AIDS, misconception towards certain myth about PLWHA and views on certain measures to prevent HIV transmissions. The instrument used in our study demonstrated clarity to communicate the intended meaning, coherency to define the logic wording, extendibility to accommodate newly added items with the domains, unbiased to allow for applicability and complex to meet the desired study purposes (Table 4).

Table 4.

Spearman’s rho correlations analysis

Pearson correlations with outcome variables
Knowledge Attitude Respondent views Perception Misconceptions Total
Knowledge – −0.159** (0.000) 0.381b (0.000) 0.395b (0.000) 0.074a (0.093) 0.438b (0.000)
Attitude −0.159b (0.000) – −0.033 (0.459) −0.078 (0.77) 0.052 (0.240) 0.385b (0.000)
Respondents views 0.381b (0.000) −0.033 (0.607) – 0.337b (0.000) 0.346b (0.000) 0.715b (0.000)
Perception 0.395b (0.000) −0.078 (0.129) 0.337b (0.000) – 0.201b (0.000) 0.624b (0.000)
Misconceptions 0.074a (0.016) 0.052 (0.569) 0.346b (0.000) 0.201b (0.000) – 0.518b (0.000)
Total 0.438b (0.000) 0.385b (0.000) 0.715b (0.000) 0.624b (0.000) 0.518b (0.000) –
Open in a new tab

aCorrelation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed)

bCorrelation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)

Many studies has used the WHO-KABP scale to assess the knowledge, attitude and practice towards PLWHA from past decades and applied on different groups, subgroups and geographical populations. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study focused on PLWHA adult family members KAP-MV residing in high prevalent Warangal district, South-Central India.

Discussions on KAP-MV

Knowledge

Nearly two-third of respondents have had a clear knowledge about the abbreviation used for HIV/AIDS. The adult family members of PLWHA had expressed a positive answer towards HIV/AIDS and high level of KAP-MV score on issues related to HIV/AIDS transmission, considering the majority of the respondents had answered correctly. Also the notation that AIDS is a hereditary disease or AIDS is a cured disease and that there is a vaccine for AIDS were equally answered correctly by respondents in a very high percent. However, a low percent of the respondents believed that AIDS is a hereditary disease and that there is an active treatment to cure AIDS, which was consistently very low compared with other results conducted in various populations, (Meera et al. 2013; Tebourski and Ben Alaya 2004; Ayranchi 2005; Montazeri 2005). In our study, considerable proportion (7.8 %) of the respondents thought that there is vaccine for AIDS, which was lower than findings of other study (11 %), (Yazdi et al. 2006).

In overall knowledge domain, the respondents have shown a high level of knowledge towards HIV/AIDS. These findings are much better than the previous studies under taken in Behaviors Surveillance Survey (BSS) (Claeson and Alexander 2008) and in Singh and co-workers study. (Kumar et al. 2015)

Attitudes

With the exception of the statement that AIDS patients deserve free treatment, the respondents demonstrated a fair attitude associated with 4 of the 5 items in this domain. It was found that some appreciated number of adult family members with negative attitude have expressed less tolerance in talking, working, willing to live and feeling empathy towards PLWHA.

A report from the Japan demonstrated a positive change in attitude among college students, (Wang et al. 2013). Other (Lal et al. 2008) study performed on demonstrated a positive association between positive attitude concerning AIDS and tolerance of HIV patients. We have found slightly more than half of respondents expressed more tolerated attitude towards AIDS patients. Though better knowledge had not shown their changing attitude, we have anticipated that PLWHA adult family members need necessary counseling and targeted tailored education about attitude to pose some influence upon behavioral and attitudinal changes.

Perception

Overall, there were misperception was observed regarding the kissing can transmit HIV. This problem was also addressed by previous investigators (Yazdi et al. 2006; Fonner et al. 2014; Nkansah-Amankra et al. 2011). However, one study (Yazdi et al. 2006) shown many misconceptions regarding HIV transmission than our study population. In our study, a considerable proportion of respondents thought that sexual intercourse without condom usage can transmit HIV/AIDS. Using condom is important preventive measure to prevent HIV transmission. Other methods are avoiding unsafe sex, avoiding untested blood transfusion and sharing personal items like blades, needles and syringes. Regarding the using of sterilized needles and syringes and HIV free blood transfusion, most of the respondents answered correctly indicating the important preventive measure for HIV transmission. These results were much higher than in the study by Kumar and co-workers. (Goel et al. 2010) Study on nursing students where 75 % of the respondents agreed that using of sterilized needles and syringes, HIV free blood transfusion (82 %) were important for prevention. PLWHA adult family member perception towards preventing HIV-infections is very important in developing prevention interventions strategies.

Views towards preventive measures

The most interesting finding from this survey was the fact that adult family members have showed positive opinion towards PLWHA, with the exception of few items (31, 33 and 36). For example, 28.7 % of the respondents opinioned that PLWHA should be isolated from the community or special centre, avoiding mosquito bites to prevent HIV transmission (21.2 %) and unwillingness to share toilets with HIV infected people. Furthermore, when taking into consideration that the majority of the respondents had a positive views towards PLWHA and the level of opinions about PLWHA were above average for this attitude may be that few of adult family members do not have much positive opinion or views towards people with AIDS.

Misconception

Our study demonstrated that in general average number of the respondents harbored misconceptions. For instance, 34.5 % of the adult family members agreed with the statement that love is a reason for HIV/AIDS and AIDS is a punishment from God (27.6 %). In parallel, this proportion was slightly higher than in Ayranci and co-workers study (23.2 %), (Tebourski and Ben Alaya 2004) and double than findings from Montazeri study (14.2 %), (Montazeri 2005) which was conducted on Iranian general population. This means that these adult family members believe that even relationship factors and religious factors could not prevent a person from HIV infection. This indicated that there is a need for further investigation into the role of positive relationship attitude and religion in AIDS prevention, particularly in India where religion beliefs plays an important role in people’s everyday life.

The KAP-MV correlations

The adult family members’ role is very important, to support, care and help their beloved PLWHA to improve their quality of life. Taking everything into account, overall, there was a little negative attitude, low perceptions and misconception about HIV/AIDS was observed in the responded adult family members. These may be a risk probably influenced by the widespread denial of the existence of false beliefs from the Indian communities and disparities in attitudinal problems aroused by the lack of awareness about AIDS which need to be addressed.

Study limitations

The present study reported here has confronted several limitations. First, the study was designed as self-administered questionnaire, which poses difficulty in validating the PLWHA adult family member answers. They may over-report socially desirable answers and underreport undesirable ones.

Secondly, we believed the participants were honest related to relationship to the PLWHA, so we did not included them in the questionnaire due to ethical and cultural concern in India. However, since relationship status and caring status are considered to be the major avenues to support PLWHA patients, this omission was unfortunate. The inclusion of such data would have provided useful information on the caring and support activities among PLWHA adult family members.

Finally, these findings may not be extrapolated to other populations groups in India who may differ substantially in relationships, distribution, awareness and cultural status.

Strength and weakness of the study

The PLWHA adult family members represent an important subgroup of the Indian population affect and affected by the provided care. The information provided will be useful in the planning and focusing of future awareness programs and interventions related to HIV/AIDS in PLWHA adult family members.

Conclusions

Adult family members of PLWHA had shown accepted satisfactory levels (64.9 %) of KAP-MV towards HIV/AIDS high prevalent in Warangal district, South India. The level of education, marital status, religious beliefs, and employment status has been identified as key barriers for adult family members caring for PLWHA. Interventions targeting adult family members of PLWHA are warranted to raise their awareness and knowledge, improves attitudes, minimize the negative views and misconception for more proactive role.

Practice implications

The following are highlighted as implications of the study on clinical practice:

  • Encourage the role of family members for supporting PLWHA.

  • Deploy interventions to raise the knowledge, attitudes, perception and views of family members of PLWHA.

  • Minimize the barriers for adult family members caring for PLWHA.

  • Change the family members misconceptions about PLWHA.

Authors’ contributions

ASB: Idea generator, concept. DKB, AAE, AA, MUK, MB, FH, AS: manuscript draft, manuscript design, manuscript review. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thanks all participants for their support to the project and for sharing their views and opinions.

Declaration We declare that the paper is the original work of the author(s) and not copied (in whole or in part) from any other work. We also declare no similar work has been submitted to or published by another journal and that it has not been submitted/published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language.

Funding

None.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Abbreviations

AIDS

acquired immune deficiency syndrome

ART

antiretroviral therapy

BSS

behaviors surveillance survey

HIV

human immune virus

KAP-MV

knowledge, attitudes, perception, misconception and views

KABP

knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and practices

MGM

Mahatma Gandhi Memorial

NACO

National Control Organization

NFHS-3

National Family Health Survey-3

NRTIs

nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors

NNRTIs

non nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors

PLWHA

people living with human immune virus-AIDS

STDs

sexually transmitted diseases

WHO

World Health Organization

Appendix

Inline graphicInline graphic

Contributor Information

Akshaya Srikanth Bhagavathula, Email: akshaypharmd@gmail.com.

Deepak Kumar Bandari, Email: laxmideepak.pharma@gmail.com.

Asim Ahmad Elnour, Email: assahura1962@uaeu.ac.ae.

Akram Ahmad, Email: akrampharma67@gmail.com.

Muhammad Umair Khan, Email: umair104@yahoo.com.

Mohamed Baraka, Email: mabaraka@uod.ac.sa.

Farah Hamad, Email: f.hamad@ajman.ac.ae.

Abdulla Shehab, Email: a.shehab@uaeu.ac.ae.

References

  1. Ayranchi U. AIDS knowledge and attitude in a Turkish population: an epidemiological study. BMC Public Health. 2005;5:95. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bharat S, Ramakrishna J, Heylen E, Ekstrand ML. Gender-based attitude, HIV misconceptions and feelings towards marginalized groups are associated with stigmatization on Mumbai, India. J Biosoc Sci. 2014;46:1–16. doi: 10.1017/S0021932014000054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Claeson M, Alexander A. Tackling HIV in India: evidence-based priority setting and programming. Health Aff. 2008;27(4):1091–1102. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.4.1091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Creative Research System. Available at http://www.surveysystem.com/sscalc.html. Accessed 4 June 2014
  5. Dandona L, Kumar GL, Lakshmi V, Ahmad MM, Akbar M, Ramgopal SP, et al. HIV incidence from the first population-based cohort study in India. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:327. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Feng MC, Feng JY, Chen TC, Lu PL, Ko NY, Chen YH. Stress, needs, and quality of life of family members caring adults living with HIV/AIDS in Taiwan. AIDS Care. 2009;21(4):382–489. doi: 10.1080/09540120802290373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fonner VA, Armstrong KS, Kenney CE, O’Reilly KR, Sweat MD. School based sex educational and HIV prevention in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e89692. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goel NK, Bansal R, Pathak R, Sharma HK, Aggarwal M, Luthra SC. Knowledge and awareness of nursing students about HIV/AIDS. Health Popul Perspec Issues. 2010;33(1):55–60. [Google Scholar]
  9. International Institute for Population Sciences. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3) 2005–2006: India. Key findings. Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences, 2007, p 24
  10. Jeyaseelan L, Kumar S, Mohanraj R, Rebekah G, Rao D, Manhart LE. Assessing HIDS/AIDS stigma in south India: validation and abridgement of the Berger HIV stigma scale. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(1):434–443. doi: 10.1007/s10461-011-0128-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Joshua V, Gupta MD, Adhikary R, Paranjape RS, Manikar MK, Brahmam GNV, et al. Index based mapping of high risk behaviors for HIV among female sex workers in India. Ind J Med Res. 2011;136(Suppl):14–22. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kermode M, Holmes W, Langkham B, Thomas MS, Gifford S. HIV-related knowledge, attitude and risk perception amongst nurses, doctors and other healthcare workers in rural India. Indian J Med Res. 2005;122(3):258. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Krishna VAS, Bhatti RS, Chandra PS, Juvva S. Unheard voices: experiences of families living with HIV/AIDS in India. Contemp Fam Ther. 2005;27(4):483–506. doi: 10.1007/s10591-005-8235-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kumar C, Kumar V, Karir S, Haider S, Kashyap V. Awareness about HIV/AIDS among pregnant women attending PPTCT Centre RIMS, Ranchi, Jharkhand. J Compr Health. 2015;3(1):62–73. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lal P, Nath A, Badhan S, Ingle GK. A study of awareness about HIV/AIDS among senior secondary school children of Delhi. Indian J Comm Med. 2008;33(3):190. doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.42063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Liyun Wu, Li Xiaoming. Community-based HIV/AIDS interventions to promote psychosocial well-being among people living with HIV/AIDS: a literature review. Health Psychol Behav Med. 2013;1(1):31–46. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2013.822798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mawar N, Saha S, Pandit A, Mahajan U. The third phase of HIV pandemic: social consequences of HIV/AIDS stigma and discrimination and future needs. Indian J Med Res. 2005;122:471–484. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Meera KP, Pandey SK, Rai M, Bharti A, Sunder S. Knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) study on HIV/AIDS among HIV patients, care givers, and general population in north-eastern part of India. Int J Med Sci Pub Health. 2013;2(1):36–42. doi: 10.5455/ijmsph.2013.2.36-42. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Montazeri A. AIDS knowledge and attitudes in Iran: results from a population-based survey in Tehran. Patient Educ Counsel. 2005;57:199–203. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Montazeri A. AIDS knowledge and attitudes in Iran: results from a population-based survey in Tehran. Patient Educ Counsel. 2005;57:199–203. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. National AIDS Control Organization, Department of AIDS Control. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, India. Annual Report 2012–2013. http://www.nacoonline.org/NACO/Quick_Links/Publication/Annual_Report/NACO_Annual_Report/Annual_Report_2012-13/. Accessed on 12 Dec 2013
  22. Nkansah-Amankra S, Diedhiou A, Agbanu HL, Harrod C, Dhawan A. Correlates of sexual risk behaviors among high school students in Colorado: analysis and implications for school-based HIV/AIDS programs. Matern Child Health J. 2011;15(6):730–741. doi: 10.1007/s10995-010-0634-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pallikadavath S, Garda L, Apte H, Freedman J, Stones RW. HIV/AIDS in rural India: context and health care needs. J Biosoc Sci. 2005;37:641–655. doi: 10.1017/S0021932004006893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Registrar General of India . Census of India 2011: provisional population totals paper 2 of 2011: Andhra Pradesh. New Delhi: Office of the Registrar General of India; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  25. Shankar R, Pandey S, Awasthi S, Pawat CMS. Awareness of HIV/AIDS among first year medical undergraduates in Nainital, Uttarakhand, India. Indian J Prev Soc Med. 2011;42(2):169. [Google Scholar]
  26. Tebourski F, Ben Alaya D. Knowledge and attitudes of high school students regarding HIV/AIDS in Tunisia: does more knowledge lead to more positive attitudes? J Adolesc Health. 2004;34:161–164. doi: 10.1016/S1054-139X(04)00002-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Vlassoff C, Weiss MG, Rao S, Ali F. HIV-related stigma in rural and traditional communities of Maharashtra, India. J Health Popul Nutr. 2012;30(4):394–403. doi: 10.3329/jhpn.v30i4.13291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang G, Wada K, Hoshi K, Sasaki N, Ezoe S, Satoh T. Association of knowledge of HIV infections: a national cross-sectional survey among the Japanese non-medical working population. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e68495. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. World Health Organization (1990) Global program on AIDS Social and Behavior Research Unit. Research package: knowledge, attitude, beliefs and practices on AIDS (KABP). Phase I, Release 20.01.90. World Health Organization, Geneva
  30. Yazdi CA, Aschbacher K, Arbantaj A, Naser HM, Abdollahi E, Asadi M, et al. Knowledge, attitude and sources of information regarding HIV/AIDS in Iranian adolescents. AIDS Care. 2006;18(8):1004–1010. doi: 10.1080/09540120500526284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from SpringerPlus are provided here courtesy of Springer-Verlag

RESOURCES