Skip to main content
Rheumatology (Oxford, England) logoLink to Rheumatology (Oxford, England)
. 2015 Aug 8;55(1):25–32. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev273

Identifying a novel locus for psoriatic arthritis

Ashley Budu-Aggrey 1,2, John Bowes 1, Anne Barton 1,2,3,
PMCID: PMC4676906  PMID: 26255310

Abstract

A number of studies have identified genetic risk loci for PsA, the majority of which also confer risk for psoriasis. The stronger heritability of PsA in comparison with psoriasis suggests that there should be risk loci that are specific for PsA. Identifying such loci could potentially inform therapy development to provide more effective treatments for PsA patients, especially with a considerable proportion being non-responsive to current therapies. Evidence of a PsA-specific locus has been previously found at HLA-B27 within the MHC region. A recent study has provided evidence of non-HLA risk loci that are specific for PsA at IL23R, PTPN22 and on chromosome 5q31. Functional characterization of these loci will provide further understanding of the pathways underlying PsA, and enable us to apply genetic findings for patient benefit.

Keywords: Psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis, specific risk loci, Immunochip, functional characterization


Rheumatology key messages

  • Genetics studies in PsA could potentially aid the development of more effective therapies for patients.

  • Currently, four genetic loci have been found to increase risk of PsA and not psoriasis.

  • Characterization of PsA-specific loci will aid in applying genetic findings to patient benefit.

Introduction

PsA is an inflammatory arthritis that is associated with psoriasis; it has a prevalence of 0.19% in the UK [1] and ∼14% of psoriasis patients are estimated to develop PsA [2]. Although there is clinical overlap between the two diseases, patients with PsA have been found to have a poorer quality of life compared with patients with psoriasis alone [3]. Treatments administered to PsA patients are similar to those used to treat RA and psoriasis; however, there is a significant proportion of PsA patients who are non-responsive to current treatments. This highlights an unmet clinical need for novel therapeutic targets and effective treatments for PsA. Genetic and functional studies have the potential to inform this process by identifying variants that are enriched in patients and whose gene-target could, in turn, be novel targets for treatment. Studies in RA form the paradigm for this approach because genetic susceptibility loci have been shown to be enriched for drug targets [4]. Therefore, genetic studies of PsA have the potential to inform therapy development. Furthermore, as nearly 40% of PsA patients are either undiagnosed or misdiagnosed [5], the identification of PsA-specific loci could also provide markers for identification of prevalent PsA in psoriasis patients as well as identifying psoriasis patients at higher risk of developing PsA later in life. In this article, we review progress in the field of PsA genetics, focusing in particular on the identification of PsA-specific loci.

Unmet clinical need

At present, treatments for PsA patients are prescribed according to the severity of disease. Patients suffering from the milder or localized forms of disease are treated with NSAIDs and IA CS injections in order to reduce inflammation [6]. Under the current NICE guidelines, the non-biologic DMARDs (nbDMARDs) MTX, LEF, SSZ, AZA and CSA have been licensed to treat patients with moderate to severe forms of disease. Biologic therapies are prescribed for patients who are non-responsive to nbDMARDs [6]. Biologic therapies include adalimumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab and certolizumab pegol and act to block the activity of the proinflammatory cytokine, TNFα. Apart from anti-TNF therapies, another biologic treatment is ustekinumab, which targets the shared p40 subunit of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-12 and IL-23 [7].

Although a number of therapies are licensed for use in PsA, the effectiveness of existing treatments remains unpredictable and response rates are variable. MTX is most commonly used to treat PsA. However, in a randomized placebo-controlled trial of 221 PsA patients [8] it was reported that MTX failed to significantly improve the inflammatory synovitis experienced by patients. An improvement was observed for skin disease, but it should be noted that the dose of MTX used in that trial was lower than standard practice. The study has also been criticized for the inclusion of patients with mild disease, the use of the PsA response criteria as a primary outcome measure and the study duration [9]. Nonetheless, the results do contradict those of Chandran et al. [10], who reported that high doses of MTX can improve the clinical outlook of PsA patients and reduce the progression of joint damage. Furthermore, a study by Eder et al. [11] has reported anti-TNFα treatments to be more effective than MTX in preventing progressive radiographic joint damage in patients with erosive PsA. Anti-TNFα therapies have been successful in treating other clinical features experienced by PsA patients, including peripheral arthritis, spondylitis, psoriasis, enthesitis and dactylitis [12–16]. However, the extent of the response reported in trials of PsA is often disappointing, e.g. by week 24, only 52–60% of patients receiving treatment had reached an ACR20 response rate (defined as at least 20% improvement in clinical features) (Fig. 1). This indicates that a notable proportion of patients are non-responsive, with a pattern also seen in RA, for which anti-TNFα treatment is successful in 60–70% of patients [17]. Even fewer PsA patients demonstrate an adequate response to treatment; only 20–30% were reported to reach an ACR70 response rate [12–16]. As the expense of these therapies in the UK can reach up to £10 000 per patient per year, developing more effective therapies would not only provide clinical benefit for patients, but would also benefit the economy.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Patients’ response after 24 weeks during clinical trials for adalimumab [12], etanercept [13], infliximab [14], golimumab [15] and certolizumab pegol [16]

CZP: certolizumab pegol.

Genetic risk loci as therapeutic targets

The link between genetics and therapeutic targets has been recently demonstrated in RA. A study led by Robert Plenge [4] reported a drug–gene pair with the RA risk gene IL6R, whose protein product is the therapeutic target of tocilizumab, an approved drug for RA (Fig. 2A). Overall, an enrichment was found for risk loci for genes that are drug targets for existing RA therapies, serving as a reverse proof-of-principle for the approach. Also in that study, an enrichment of RA risk loci and genes whose protein products are therapeutic targets for existing cancer treatments was reported, highlighting how genetic data can be used to repurpose approved drugs for other diseases (Fig. 2B) [4]. Finally, an example of where genetic knowledge has directly led to a new drug comes from hypercholesterolaemia. This condition is associated with a gain-of-function mutation in proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9), resulting in high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The human mAb, REGN727, targets PCSK9 and has been found to significantly reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in individuals with hypercholesterolaemia [18]. These studies demonstrate the role of human genetics in drug target identification and validation, supporting the hypothesis that risk loci can uncover both approved and novel drug targets [4]. This also highlights the potential role that a specific PsA risk locus could play in identifying and validating a novel drug target.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Connection of genetic risk loci with therapeutic targets

(A) Direct link identified between an RA risk SNP and existing therapeutic target. (B) Connections between RA risk loci and therapeutic targets of other diseases. Adapted by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd: Nature (Okada Y, Wu D, Trynka G et al. Genetics of rheumatoid arthritis contributes to biology and drug discovery. Nature 2014;506:376–81), © 2014.

Genetic loci as predictors of treatment response

Studies in RA have highlighted that genetic susceptibility loci may also predict response to treatment. For example, the major RA susceptibility locus is the HLA-DRB1 gene. Haplotypes defined by different amino acids at positions 11, 71 and 74 have recently been reported by Viatte et al. [19] to be associated with the development of erosions, premature mortality and treatment response to anti-TNF biologic drugs . The identification of novel PsA loci may, therefore, enable better targeting of available therapies to patients—precision medicine. As reviewed by Jani et al. [20], studies of genetic polymorphisms predicting response to PsA have highlighted a number of plausible candidates, but require replication in larger case series. Proteomic markers in synovial tissue have also been reported to be correlated with adalimumab response [21]. However, to date, no studies have specifically investigated PsA susceptibility loci to determine whether they also predict treatment response.

Identifying risk loci

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have been highly successful in identifying regions of the genome that confer disease risk, particularly of complex diseases that cannot be explained by Mendelian genetics. The introduction of the Immunochip custom genotyping array (Illumina) provided a means of genotyping known single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across confirmed loci from 12 immune-related diseases, with increased power due to the representation of disease-associated loci. Use of the Immunochip has allowed for large regions of association to be refined, resulting in an increase in the number of known susceptibility loci for immune diseases, including RA, psoriasis and Crohn’s disease [22–24]. In psoriasis, this has resulted in the identification of 15 novel risk loci, bringing the total to 36 confirmed loci (P < 5 x 108) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Psoriasis susceptibility loci

SNP Chromosome Position (bp) Combined P value Notable genes
rs2477077 1 197671115 2.4 × 10−7 DENND1Ba
rs7552167 1 24518643 8.5 × 10−12 IL28RA
rs9988642 1 67726104 1.1 × 10−26 IL23Rb
rs6677595 1 152590187 2.1 × 10−33 LCE3B, LCE3D
rs11121129 1 8268095 1.7 × 10−8 SLC45A1, TNFRSF9
rs7536201 1 25293084 2.3 × 10−12 RUNX3
rs62149416 2 61083506 1.8 × 10−17 FLJ16341, REL
rs17716942 2 163260691 3.3 × 10−18 KCNH7, IFIH1
rs10865331 2 62551472 4.7 × 10−10 B3GNT2
rs27432 5 96119273 1.9 × 10−20 ERAP1
rs1295685 5 131996445 3.4 × 10−10 IL13, IL4
rs2233278 5 150467189 2.2 × 10−42 TNIP1b
rs12188300 5 158829527 3.2 × 10−53 IL12Bb
rs4406273 6 31266090 4.5 × 10−723 HLA-B, HLA-Cb
rs33980500 6 111913262 4.2 × 10−45 TRAF3IP2b
rs582757 6 138197824 2.2 × 10−25 TNFAIP3
rs9504361 6 577820 2.1 × 10−11 EXOC2, IRF4
rs2451258 6 159506600 3.4 × 10−8 TAGAP
rs2700987 7 37386237 4.3 × 10−9 ELMO1
rs11795343 9 32523737 8.4 × 10−11 DDX58
rs10979182 9 110817020 2.3 × 10−8 KLF4
rs1250546 10 81032532 6.8 × 10−7 ZMIZ1
rs645078 11 64135298 2.2 × 10−6 RPS6KA4, PRDX5
rs4561177 11 109962432 7.7 × 10−13 ZC3H12C
rs3802826 11 128406438 9.5 × 10−10 ETS1
rs2066819 12 56750204 5.4 × 10−17 STAT2, IL23Ab
rs8016947 14 35832666 2.5 × 10−17 NFKBIA
rs12445568 16 31004812 1.2 × 10−16 PRSS53, FBXL19
rs367569 16 11365500 4.9 × 10−8 PRM3, SOCS1
rs28998802 17 26124908 3.3 × 10−16 NOS2
rs963986 17 40561579 5.3 × 10−9 PTRF, STAT3, STAT5A/B
rs11652075 17 78178893 3.4 × 10−8 CARD14
rs545979 18 51819750 3.5 × 10−10 POL1, STARD6, MBD2
rs34536443 19 10463118 9.1 × 10−31 TYK2b
rs892085 19 10818092 3.0 × 10−17 ILF3,CARM1
rs1056198 20 48556229 1.5 × 10−14 RNF114
rs4821124 22 21979289 3.8 × 10−8 UBE2L3

Combined P-value—P-value from meta-analysis by Tsoi et al. [24]. aPsoriasis locus identified by Bowes et al. [29]. bLoci associated with PsA at genome-wide levels of significance. Adapted with permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd: Nature Genetics (Tsoi LC, Spain SL, Knight J et al. Identification of 15 new psoriasis susceptibility loci highlights the role of innate immunity. Nat Genet 2012;44:1341–8), ©2012.

Genetic studies in PsA

A number of candidate gene studies have been carried out in PsA. Many have focused on variants previously reported to be associated with psoriasis, but only a few loci are confirmed to be associated at accepted thresholds. These include RUNX3 [25], IL23A and TNIP1 [26]. To date, only one GWAS study has been published that has focused solely on PsA. In a study of 609 German PsA patients with replication in several European cohorts, Huffmeier et al. [27] reported variants of TRAF3IP2 to be significantly associated with PsA, exceeding the genome-wide threshold. Interestingly, the same locus was also identified by a North American consortium, in which PsA cases among a psoriasis cohort were analysed for association [28].

Recently, the largest PsA study to date, which involved the genotyping of 1962 PsA patients and 8923 controls with the Immunochip array, reported seven loci to be associated at a level of genome-wide significance [29] (Table 1). A novel psoriasis risk variant (rs2477077) mapping to DENND1B was also found to be associated with psoriasis per se. All the previously reported loci with confirmed association with psoriasis were also at least nominally associated with PsA. The overlap of risk loci observed between PsA and psoriasis highlights the strong genetic overlap between the two diseases. However, an Icelandic family study among first-degree relatives with PsA reported a recurrence risk (λ) of 40 [30], while that of psoriasis has been reported to be between 4 and 10 [31]. This difference in heritability suggests that there should be risk loci that are associated specifically with PsA and not with psoriasis.

Specific PsA risk loci

It has long been recognized that HLA-B27 is enriched in PsA. In 2012, Eder et al. [32] reported HLA-B27 to be a genetic marker for PsA and not psoriasis, also confirming evidence found in earlier studies [33]. In addition to HLA-B27, evidence suggests that other HLA-B alleles within the MHC specifically confer risk for PsA. This includes HLA-B08, which has also been found to be associated with specific clinical features of PsA [32, 34, 35]. Imputing genes within the MHC region is an approach that has been applied in a number of studies to identify and define associated HLA alleles. This has been demonstrated in psoriasis, for which HLA imputation was carried out with Immunochip and GWAS datasets in order to fine-map risk variants in the MHC region [36]. In doing so, independent effects were found for HLA alleles A, B and C for both PsA and psoriasis [29, 36]. When analysing PsA risk and psoriasis risk separately, the strongest association observed among the HLA variants was with HLA-C*0602, which when conditioned upon revealed an independent contribution from HLA-B. This is consistent with the findings reported for PsA by Bowes et al. (P = 5.85 × 1052) [29]. When testing for association of HLA variants with PsA risk versus psoriasis risk, the strongest association was found with HLA-B amino acid position 45, for which HLA–B Glu45 was found to increase PsA risk compared with psoriasis risk. As a result, it was reported that risk heterogeneity between PsA and psoriasis is driven by variants of HLA-B. This association differentiates PsA from psoriasis, and as HLA-B27 and HLA-B38 also carry Glu at position 45, this explains the stronger association of these alleles with PsA compared with psoriasis [36]. The study demonstrates the use of HLA imputation to highlight the difference in genetic factors that confer risk for PsA and psoriasis, and supports the evidence that there may indeed be additional genetic variants that confer risk specifically for PsA and not psoriasis.

Outside the HLA region, studies have identified a number of loci with larger effect sizes in PsA than psoriasis. This includes variants at TRAF3IP2, REL and FBXL19 [27, 37, 38]; however, the loci are associated with both phenotypes and are not specific to PsA.

Evidence has been reported for a specific association with PsA at the IL13 gene locus. Variants of this gene (rs1800925, rs848 and rs20541) were initially reported to be associated with psoriasis in a study comprising 467 Utah psoriasis patients and 500 controls [39]. The association was replicated in a later, larger study including the same sample set but with additional cases and controls [40]. However, when patients with PsA were excluded from analysis, no association with psoriasis remained [41]. Subsequent studies in Canadian and UK populations [42] confirmed these findings and reported variants of IL13 to be significantly associated with PsA but not with psoriasis. It is interesting to note that the psoriasis Immunochip study by Tsoi et al. [24], which included a larger number of psoriasis cases, did report an association of IL13 with psoriasis, but cases with known PsA, were not excluded from the analysis. Whether IL13 represents a PsA-specific association, therefore, requires further investigation.

Recently, a second PsA-specific association has been detected on chromosome 5q31, upstream and independent of the IL13 association, at the SNP rs715285 (P = 2.7 × 1010, odds ratio 1.25) [29]. This association was replicated in an independent PsA cohort, but showed only nominally significant association in two independent psoriasis cohorts, suggesting that the association is specific for PsA. In the same study, a specific association was also found with a variant of IL23R (rs12044149), independent of a psoriasis-associated variant in the same gene (rs9988642). IL23 is a drug target for ustekinumab, currently used as a treatment for psoriasis. Although not currently licensed for PsA in the UK, the drug has shown efficacy in treating PsA in clinical trials [43].

Finally, a SNP mapping to PTPN22 (rs2476601) has recently been reported to be PsA-specific [44]. The SNP is associated with a range of autoimmune diseases, but previous studies in PsA failed to detect consistent evidence for association [45, 46]. However, in a cohort of 3139 PsA cases and 11 078 controls, the association was confirmed at genome-wide levels of significance for the first time (P = 1.49 × 109, odds ratio 1.32), with no association detected with psoriasis [44]. As this is also a risk locus for RA [45], one interpretation is that the PsA cohort contained some RA cases with co-incidental psoriasis. Importantly, however, this was addressed using a statistical approach to account for RA susceptibility risk scores.

Future directions

The studies highlighted demonstrate how dense genotyping and increased study power can aid in the identification of novel susceptibility loci that are specific for PsA. In spite of the benefits of genotyping with the Immunochip array, there are limitations with this approach. As the Immunochip does not provide full genome coverage, there may be susceptibility variants that are not captured. Furthermore, rare variants [minor allele frequency (MAF) < 1%] were not analysed in the current studies. This is important to consider, as rare variants could contribute towards disease susceptibility [47]. One method of detecting disease-associated rare variants is with the use of exome chips, which contain markers identified from exome sequencing, and so are enriched for rare variants [48]. The use of the exome chip has been demonstrated in type 2 diabetes, where the Illumina HumanExome Beadchip was used to genotype 247 870 variants in 8229 non-diabetic males. Novel associations with rare variants in three genes were detected, and the implicated genes were involved with insulin processing and secretion [49]. The application of rare-variant analysis could potentially identify risk loci that are specific for PsA that would otherwise be overlooked with the use of other genotyping platforms.

As the majority of risk variants reported in association studies lie outside gene-coding regions, further investigation is required to identify their role in disease. It has been suggested that such variants contribute towards disease susceptibility by affecting gene expression and regulation [50]. These are known as expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs), and can be mapped by identifying a correlation between gene expression and genotype at a SNP. The mapping of eQTLs is a useful approach for finding potentially causal genes within a susceptibility locus. Due to the cell type specific activity of most eQTLs and functional variants, it is important that such studies are performed within the relevant cell type for the disease in question [51]. A statistical approach was developed by Trynka et al. [51] to identify the most likely cell type responsible for disease causation by investigating the overlap of disease SNPs with the epigenetic mark, trimethylation of histone H3 at lysine 4 (H3K4me3); the hypothesis was that the overlap is cell type specific. Using this approach, the recent Immunochip study found significant enrichment of PsA-associated SNPs and functional elements in CD8+ memory primary cells, highlighting this cell type as critical in PsA but not psoriasis.

As well as identifying the most appropriate cell type, it is important to identify the causal variant in order to understand how the variant affects gene function. Candidate SNPs can be prioritized with use of publicly available data from functional genomic experiments. The publication of the Encyclopaedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) project has provided a resource by which a region of interest can be interrogated for evidence of regulatory function [52]. Functional elements such as transcribed regions, protein-coding regions, transcription factor–binding sites and histone modifications have been successfully mapped across the genome, using approaches including mass spectrometry, chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing, and RNA sequencing [52]. As well as identifying variants that affect gene expression, ENCODE data can also be used to assess the overlap of risk variants within a functional element. For example, in the recent Immunochip study, publically available data were used to identify eQTLs for 3 of the 20 genes within the 5q31 region [29]. By analysing gene expression in CD8+ memory primary cells specifically, the strongest correlation was found with genotype at rs11955347 and expression of SLC22A5. This gene encodes a solute carrier and has previously been found to be associated with inflammatory bowel disease; however, further confirmatory work is required before association with this particular gene can be unequivocally established. For example, it is important to consider eQTL studies within stimulated cells, because the function of a cell can differ depending on whether it is active or resting [53]. As demonstrated in a study by Hu et al. [53], this could aid in identifying additional eQTLs, as the majority of genes regulated by eQTLs in CD4+ T effector memory cells in that study were found in stimulated cells. Methods such as chromosome conformation capture could be applied to identify long-range interactions between a potential causal gene or SNP and regulatory regions located on other chromosomes. Ultimately, the new technique of genome editing using the CRISPR/CAS9 system can be used to validate the causal nature of variants as the system allows allele-specific changes to be introduced into the genetic sequence. This has been demonstrated by Makhlouf et al. [54], who found that the binding of transcription factor Yin-Yang has a direct effect on Xist transcription in humans and mice.

Conclusion

Great progress is being made in understanding the genetic basis of PsA. Several tentative conclusions can be drawn from the data so far. First, perhaps unsurprisingly, there appears to be complete genetic overlap between psoriasis and PsA susceptibility loci, with no validated reports of psoriasis loci that are not also associated with PsA, albeit at only nominal significance levels in PsA. Second, there is mounting evidence for an additional genetic contribution to PsA. For some loci, this is a stronger effect size (TRAF3IP2, REL, FBXL19); for others, different genetic variants at the same locus predispose to psoriasis and PsA (IL23R) whereas other loci appear specifically associated with PsA (HLA B27, 5q31 locus). This not only raises the possibility of targeted screening of the psoriasis population to identify those at higher risk of developing PsA, but also identifies targets for future drug development to improve treatment for this group of patients.

Acknowledgements

A.B.-A. is supported by the Medical Research Council and the NIHR Manchester Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit. The authors also acknowledge Arthritis Research UK (grant number 20 385) and for their support. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute of Health Research or the Department of Health.

Funding: No specific funding was received from any funding bodies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors to carry out the work described in this manuscript.

Disclosure statement: A.B. has received funding from Pfizer, AbbVie and Eli Lilly. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Ogdie A, Langan S, Love T, et al. Prevalence and treatment patterns of psoriatic arthritis in the UK. Rheumatology 2013;52:568–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ibrahim G, Waxman R, Helliwell PS. The prevalence of psoriatic arthritis in people with psoriasis. Arthritis Rheum 2009;61:1373–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rosen CF, Mussani F, Chandran V, et al. Patients with psoriatic arthritis have worse quality of life than those with psoriasis alone. Rheumatology 2012;51:571–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Okada Y, Wu D, Trynka G, et al. Genetics of rheumatoid arthritis contributes to biology and drug discovery. Nature 2014;506:376–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mease P. Methotrexate in psoriatic arthritis. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 2013;71 (Suppl 1):S41–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chang CA, Gottlieb AB, Lizzul PF. Management of psoriatic arthritis from the view of the dermatologist. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2011;7:588–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kavanaugh A, Ritchlin C, Rahman P, et al. Ustekinumab, an anti-IL-12/23 p40 monoclonal antibody, inhibits radiographic progression in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: results of an integrated analysis of radiographic data from the phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled PSUMMIT-1 and PSUMMIT-2 trials. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:1000–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kingsley GH, Kowalczyk A, Taylor H, et al. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of methotrexate in psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatology 2012;51:1368–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dougados M. Methotrexate in peripheral spondyloarthritis including psoriatic arthritis: a need for further evaluation. Rheumatology 2012;51:1343–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chandran V, Schentag CT, Gladman DD. Reappraisal of the effectiveness of methotrexate in psoriatic arthritis: results from a longitudinal observational cohort. J Rheumatol 2008;35:469–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Eder L, Thavaneswaran A, Chandran V, Gladman DD. Tumour necrosis factor alpha blockers are more effective than methotrexate in the inhibition of radiographic joint damage progression among patients with psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:1007–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mease PJ, Gladman DD, Ritchlin CT, et al. Adalimumab for the treatment of patients with moderately to severely active psoriatic arthritis: results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:3279–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mease PJ, Kivitz AJ, Burch FX, et al. Etanercept treatment of psoriatic arthritis: safety, efficacy, and effect on disease progression. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:2264–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Antoni C, Krueger GG, de Vlam K, et al. Infliximab improves signs and symptoms of psoriatic arthritis: results of the IMPACT 2 trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:1150–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kavanaugh A, McInnes I, Mease P, et al. Golimumab, a new human tumor necrosis factor alpha antibody, administered every four weeks as a subcutaneous injection in psoriatic arthritis: twenty-four-week efficacy and safety results of a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Arthritis Rheum 2009;60:976–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mease PJ, Fleischmann R, Deodhar AA, et al. Effect of certolizumab pegol on signs and symptoms in patients with psoriatic arthritis: 24-week results of a Phase 3 double-blind randomised placebo-controlled study (RAPID-PsA). Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:48–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Plant D, Bowes J, Potter C, et al. Genome-wide association study of genetic predictors of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) identifies associations with polymorphisms at seven loci. Arthritis Rheum 2011;63:645–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Stein EA, Mellis S, Yancopoulos GD, et al. Effect of a monoclonal antibody to PCSK9 on LDL cholesterol. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1108–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Viatte S, Plant D, Han B, et al. Association of HLA-DRB1 haplotypes with rheumatoid arthritis severity, mortality, and treatment response. JAMA 2015;313:1645–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jani M, Barton A, Ho P. Pharmacogenetics of treatment response in psoriatic arthritis. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2015:17:518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ademowo OS, Hernandez B, Collins E, et al. Discovery and confirmation of a protein biomarker panel with potential to predict response to biological therapy in psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2014; Advance Access published 3 September 2014, doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205417 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Eyre S, Bowes J, Diogo D, et al. High-density genetic mapping identifies new susceptibility loci for rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Genet 2012;44:1336–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jostins L, Ripke S, Weersma RK, et al. Host–microbe interactions have shaped the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature 2012;491:119–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tsoi LC, Spain SL, Knight J, et al. Identification of 15 new psoriasis susceptibility loci highlights the role of innate immunity. Nat Genet 2012;44:1341–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Apel M, Uebe S, Bowes J, et al. Variants in RUNX3 contribute to susceptibility to psoriatic arthritis, exhibiting further common ground with ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum 2013;65:1224–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bowes J, Orozco G, Flynn E, et al. Confirmation of TNIP1 and IL23A as susceptibility loci for psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:1641–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Huffmeier U, Uebe S, Ekici AB, et al. Common variants at TRAF3IP2 are associated with susceptibility to psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis. Nat Genet 2010;42:996–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ellinghaus E, Ellinghaus D, Stuart PE, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies a psoriasis susceptibility locus at TRAF3IP2. Nat Genet 2010;42:991–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bowes J, Budu-Aggrey A, Huffmeier U, et al. Dense genotyping of immune-related susceptibility loci reveals new insights into the genetics of psoriatic arthritis. Nat Commun 2015;6:6046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Karason A, Love TJ, Gudbjornsson B. A strong heritability of psoriatic arthritis over four generations—the Reykjavik Psoriatic Arthritis Study. Rheumatology 2009;48:1424–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chandran V. Familial aggregation of psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2009:68:664–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Eder L, Chandran V, Pellet F, et al. Human leucocyte antigen risk alleles for psoriatic arthritis among patients with psoriasis. Ann Rheum Dis 2012;71:50–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gladman DD, Anhorn KA, Schachter RK, Mervart H. HLA antigens in psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol 1986;13:586–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Haroon M, Winchester R, Giles JT, Heffernan E, FitzGerald O. Certain class I HLA alleles and haplotypes implicated in susceptibility play a role in determining specific features of the psoriatic arthritis phenotype. Ann Rheum Dis 2014; Advance Access published 26 September 2014, doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205461 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Winchester R, Minevich G, Steshenko V, et al. HLA associations reveal genetic heterogeneity in psoriatic arthritis and in the psoriasis phenotype. Arthritis Rheum 2012;64:1134–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Okada Y, Han B, Tsoi LC, et al. Fine mapping major histocompatibility complex associations in psoriasis and its clinical subtypes. Am J Hum Genet 2014;95:162–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Stuart PE, Nair RP, Ellinghaus E, et al. Genome-wide association analysis identifies three psoriasis susceptibility loci. Nat Genet 2010;42:1000–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ellinghaus E, Stuart PE, Ellinghaus D, et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis of psoriatic arthritis identifies susceptibility locus at REL. J Invest Dermatol 2012;132:1133–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chang M, Li Y, Yan C, et al. Variants in the 5q31 cytokine gene cluster are associated with psoriasis. Genes Immun 2008;9:176–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Nair RP, Duffin KC, Helms C, et al. Genome-wide scan reveals association of psoriasis with IL-23 and NF-kappaB pathways. Nat Genet 2009;41:199–204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Duffin KC, Freeny IC, Schrodi SJ, et al. Association between IL13 polymorphisms and psoriatic arthritis is modified by smoking. J Invest Dermatol 2009;129:2777–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bowes J, Eyre S, Flynn E, et al. Evidence to support IL-13 as a risk locus for psoriatic arthritis but not psoriasis vulgaris. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:1016–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.McInnes IB, Kavanaugh A, Gottlieb AB, et al. Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: 1 year results of the phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled PSUMMIT 1 trial. Lancet 2013;382:780–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bowes J, Loehr S, Budu-Aggrey A, et al. PTPN22 is associated with susceptibility to psoriatic arthritis but not psoriasis: evidence for a further PsA-specific risk locus. Ann Rheum Dis 2015; Advance Access published 28 April 2015, doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-207187 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hinks A, Barton A, John S, et al. Association between the PTPN22 gene and rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis in a UK population: further support that PTPN22 is an autoimmunity gene. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:1694–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Huffmeier U, Reis A, Steffens M, et al. Male restricted genetic association of variant R620W in PTPN22 with psoriatic arthritis. J Invest Dermatol 2006;126:932–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wu MC, Lee S, Cai T, et al. Rare-variant association testing for sequencing data with the sequence kernel association test. Am J Hum Genet 2011;89:82–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Guo Y, He J, Zhao S, et al. Illumina human exome genotyping array clustering and quality control. Nat Protocols 2014;9:2643–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Huyghe JR, Jackson AU, Fogarty MP, et al. Exome array analysis identifies new loci and low-frequency variants influencing insulin processing and secretion. Nat Genet 2013;45:197–201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ritchie GR, Dunham I, Zeggini E, Flicek P. Functional annotation of noncoding sequence variants. Nat Methods 2014;11:294–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Trynka G, Sandor C, Han B, et al. Chromatin marks identify critical cell types for fine mapping complex trait variants. Nat Genet 2013;45:124–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.The ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 2012;489:57–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hu X, Kim H, Raj T, et al. Regulation of gene expression in autoimmune disease loci and the genetic basis of proliferation in CD4(+) effector memory T Cells. PLoS Genet 2014;10:e1004404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Makhlouf M, Ouimette JF, Oldfield A, et al. A prominent and conserved role for YY1 in Xist transcriptional activation. Nat Commun 2014;5:4878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Rheumatology (Oxford, England) are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES