Skip to main content
HHS Author Manuscripts logoLink to HHS Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 14.
Published in final edited form as: Vaccine. 2014 Sep 22;32(48):6356–6359. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.09.033

HPV vaccine coverage among men who have sex with men – National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System, United States, 2011

Elissa Meites a,*, Lauri E Markowitz a, Gabriela Paz-Bailey b, Alexandra M Oster b, for the NHBS Study Group
PMCID: PMC4677785  NIHMSID: NIHMS743255  PMID: 25258097

Abstract

Men who have sex with men (MSM) are at high risk for disease associated with human papillomavirus (HPV). In late 2011, HPV vaccine was recommended for males through age 21 and MSM through age 26. Using data from the 2011 National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System, we assessed self-reported HPV vaccine uptake among MSM, using multivariate analysis to calculate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Among 3221 MSM aged 18–26, 157 (4.9%) reported ≥1 vaccine dose. Uptake was higher among men who visited a healthcare provider (aPR 2.3, CI: 1.2–4.2), disclosed same-sex sexual attraction/behavior to a provider (aPR 2.1, CI: 1.3–3.3), reported a positive HIV test (aPR 2.2, CI: 1.5–3.2), or received hepatitis vaccine (aPR 3.9, CI: 2.4–6.4). Of 3064 unvaccinated MSM, 2326 (75.9%) had visited a healthcare provider within 1 year. These national data on HPV vaccine uptake among MSM provide a baseline as vaccination recommendations are implemented.

Keywords: Human papillomavirus (HPV), Men who have sex with men (MSM), Vaccine uptake

1. Introduction

Men who have sex with men (MSM) are at high risk for infection and disease associated with human papillomavirus (HPV). A meta-analysis of 53 studies found the pooled prevalence of any anal HPV was 92.6% among HIV-infected MSM and 63.9% among HIV-uninfected MSM [1]. Among MSM visiting U.S. sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics, the prevalence of genital warts was 7.5% [2]. In a study involving 34,189 HIV-infected and 114,260 HIV-uninfected individuals, anal cancer incidence per 100,000 person-years was 131 among MSM, 46 among HIV-infected men, and 2 among other HIV-uninfected men [3]. Quadrivalent HPV vaccine clinical trials in MSM demonstrated high efficacy for prevention of anal cancer precursor lesions and genital warts [4].

In the United States, quadrivalent HPV vaccine was first licensed for use in females in 2006 and then for use in males in 2009 [5]. At that time in 2009, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) issued national policy stating that males may be vaccinated. In late 2011, ACIP added HPV vaccine to the routine immunization schedule for U.S. males, recommending that it be given to all boys at age 11 or 12 years and through age 21 years if not previously vaccinated [5]. HPV vaccine is also recommended through age 26 years for all MSM and immunocompromised individuals if not previously vaccinated [5,6]. ACIP recommendations are followed by health care providers and also have impact on vaccine availability through federal programs and private health insurance in the United States [6,7].

Data on HPV vaccine uptake among MSM are scarce. Results from the 2008 National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System (NHBS) suggested that there would be many opportunities for young MSM to receive recommended care including HPV vaccine, as 88.9% of participants had accessed health care within the previous 12 months and 61.3% had disclosed same-sex sexual attraction/behavior to a healthcare provider [8]. Using data from the 2011 NHBS – collected after quadrivalent vaccine was licensed, but largely before it was routinely recommended by ACIP for males in the United States – we aimed to assess baseline HPV vaccine uptake among U.S. MSM through age 26 years.

2. Materials and methods

NHBS monitors HIV-associated behaviors and HIV prevalence in the 20 U.S. cities with the largest AIDS burden. Detailed methods have been reported elsewhere [9,10]. Cross-sectional data reported in this analysis are from MSM enrolled in 2011 for interviews and HIV testing. Participant enrollment occurred using venue-based, time-space sampling at locations where MSM congregate, such as bars, clubs, and social organizations. For consenting participants aged ≥18 years residing in the metropolitan statistical area and who had not participated previously in NHBS during the current survey cycle, trained interviewers used handheld computers to administer, in English or Spanish, a standardized, anonymous questionnaire about demographics, sexual behavior, HPV vaccination history, HIV/STD testing, and other health care use. Interview participants received a cash or gift card incentive typically worth $25 [911]. Activities for NHBS were approved by local institutional review boards (IRB) for each of the 20 participating cities. NHBS activities were determined to be research in which the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) were not directly engaged and, therefore, did not require separate review by CDC IRB.

Eligible participants were born male and reported ever having a male sex partner. After describing the percentage of all MSM reporting HPV vaccine by age, we limited further analyses to MSM aged 18–26 years.

Statistical analyses were performed using SAS software, version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). We calculated descriptive frequencies and performed bivariate analyses using Pearson chi-square tests to assess associations between self-reported receipt of HPV vaccine and demographic characteristics, behavioral risk factors, and other sexual health care. In addition, among MSM who reported not receiving HPV vaccine, we assessed recent health care visits. To identify factors associated with HPV vaccine uptake, we estimated prevalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using multivariate analysis and Poisson regression modeling with robust standard errors. To select variables for this model, we first screened out variables that were not significant on bivariate analysis at alpha = 0.05 [8]. To avoid collinearity in measures of health care access, we selected one variable to include in the model (health care visits in the past 12 months) and did not include other related variables that were also significant on bivariate analysis (STD and HIV testing and diagnoses in the past 12 months).

3. Results

Of 9828 MSM aged ≥18 years who consented to the 2011 NHBS survey, 9819 with valid data were included in the analyses [11]. Of these, 262 (2.7%) reported having received ≥1 dose of HPV vaccine (Table 1). Most men who reported receipt of HPV vaccine were aged ≤26 years, within the recommended age range for vaccination. Among men older than 26 years who reported HPV vaccine receipt, HIV infection was common: 25 (71.4%) of 35 vaccinated men aged >40 years were HIV-infected, compared with 15 (38.5%) of 39 vaccinated men aged 31–40 years and 35 (18.6%) of 188 men aged ≤30 years.

Table 1.

Men who have sex with men reporting ≥1 dose of HPV vaccine, by self-reported HIV status and age – National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System, United States, 2011.

Age (years) All participants
N
Received ≥1 dose of HPV vaccine, among all participants
n (%)
Self-reported positive HIV test, among all participants
n (%)
Received ≥1 dose of HPV vaccine, among participants reporting a positive HIV test
n (%)
Total 9819 262 (2.7) 1333 (13.6) 75 (5.6)
18–26 3221 157 (4.9) 224 (6.9) 30 (13.4)
27–30 1334 31 (2.3) 145 (10.9) 5 (3.4)
31–40 2225 39 (1.8) 331 (14.9) 15 (4.5)
>40 3039 35 (1.2) 633 (20.8) 25 (3.9)

Among 3221 MSM aged 18–26 years, 157 (4.9%) reported having received ≥1 dose of HPV vaccine. Of these, 44 (28.0%) reported vaccine receipt during 2006–2009, 96 (61.1%) during 2010–2011, and 17 (10.8%) were unsure of the timing.

In bivariate analysis among men aged 18–26 years, HPV vaccine uptake was not significantly associated with any demographic factors (Table 2). Vaccine uptake was significantly higher among men who reported having access to care and receiving other sexual health care, including those who had any health insurance (5.6%), had visited a healthcare provider in the past year (5.9%), had disclosed male–male sexual attraction/behavior to a health-care provider (6.3%), had been vaccinated against hepatitis (7.4%), or had been tested for HIV (5.8%) or another STD (7.8%) in the past year. Vaccine uptake was also significantly higher among men who had received a diagnosis of chlamydia, gonorrhea, or syphilis within the past 12 months (8.1%); who had ever received a diagnosis of genital warts (10.3%), or who reported having had a positive HIV test (13.4%). Finally, vaccine uptake was significantly higher among those reporting greater numbers of sex partners in the past 12 months.

Table 2.

Predictors of self-reported receipt of HPV vaccine among young men aged 18–26 years who have sex with men — National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System, United States, 2011.

Characteristic Participants
N
Received ≥1 dose of HPV vaccine
n (%)a
Unadjusted
P value
Adjusted prevalence ratio (95% CI)
Total 3221 157 (4.9)
Age (years) 0.40
 18–21 1094 56 (5.1)
 22–26 2127 101 (4.7)
Race 0.27
 Black or African American 1155 59 (5.1)
 White 816 36 (4.4)
 Multiracial 125 12 (9.6)
 Hispanic or Latino 978 48 (4.9)
 Otherb 140 2 (1.4)
Education completed 0.50
 Less than high school 228 8 (3.5)
 High school diploma 1117 48 (4.3)
 Some college or higher 1876 101 (5.4)
Sexual identity 0.79
 Heterosexual or straight 55 0 (0)
 Homosexual or gay 2537 127 (5.0)
 Bisexual 618 30 (4.8)
Census region 0.21
 South 1192 52 (4.4)
 Northeast 775 37 (4.8)
 Midwest 436 26 (6.0)
 West 675 39 (5.8)
 Territory (San Juan, PR) 143 3 (2.1)
Health insurance 0.03
 None 1186 46 (3.9) Ref
 Any 2015 111 (5.5) 1.1 (0.8–1.6)
Usual place of care 0.06
 None 556 20 (3.6)
 One 2367 128 (5.4)
 More than one 274 8 (2.9)
Usual place of care typec 0.07
 Clinic or health center 810 50 (6.2)
 Doctor’s office or HMO 1257 72 (5.7)
 Hospital emergency room 488 12 (2.5)
 Some other place 76 2 (2.6)
Visited a health care provider within 12 months <0.01
 No 749 12 (1.6) Ref
 Yes 2471 145 (5.9) 2.3 (1.2–4.2)
Disclosed same-sex sexual attraction/behavior to a health care provider <0.01
 No 1075 22 (2.0) Ref
 Yes 2143 135 (6.3) 2.1 (1.3–3.3)
Tested for HIV within 12 months 0.01
 No 991 27 (2.7)
 Yes 2226 130 (5.8)
Tested for an STD within 12 monthsd <0.01
 No 1680 38 (2.3)
 Yes 1536 119 (7.7)
HIV test result (self-reported) <0.01
 Negative 2537 116 (4.6) Ref
 Positive 224 30 (13.4) 2.2 (1.5–3.2)
 Unknown 460 11 (2.4) 0.9 (0.5–1.7)
Diagnosed with herpes ever 0.50
 No 3137 149 (4.7)
 Yes 81 8 (9.9)
Diagnosed with genital warts ever 0.05
 No 3109 145 (4.7)
 Yes 107 11 (10.3)
Diagnosed with an STD within 12 monthsd 0.04
 No 2837 126 (4.4)
 Yes 383 31 (8.1)
Vaccinated against hepatitis ever <0.01
 No 1208 18 (1.5) Ref
 Yes 1822 132 (7.2) 3.9 (2.4–6.4)
Number of sex partners within 12 months <0.01
 0–1 577 23 (4.0) Ref
 2–3 1031 42 (4.1) 1.0 (0.6–1.7)
 4–5 597 28 (4.7) 1.1 (0.7–1.9)
 >5 1016 64 (6.3) 1.5 (0.9–2.3)
a

Numbers may not add to total due to missing data.

b

Includes Asian, Pacific Islander, American Indian, multiple races, and other race.

c

Among participants reporting ≥1 usual place of care.

d

Chlamydia, gonorrhea, or syphilis.

In the multivariate model, four factors predicted HPV vaccine uptake: visiting a health care provider within the past year (aPR 2.3, CI: 1.2–4.2); ever disclosing male–male sexual attraction/behavior to a health care provider (aPR 2.1, CI: 1.3–3.3); reporting a positive test for HIV infection (aPR 2.2, CI: 1.5–3.2); and reporting any hepatitis vaccination (aPR 2.2, CI: 1.5–3.2) (Table 2).

Of 3064 MSM aged 18–26 years in the target age range for HPV vaccine who reported being unvaccinated, 2326 (75.9%) had visited a health care provider within the past year.

4. Discussion

These are the first national data on HPV vaccine coverage among MSM in the United States. At 4.9%, coverage among MSM aged 18–26 years was low before HPV vaccine was routinely recommended for males in late 2011. Data on HPV vaccine uptake among U.S. MSM in 2011 can be used as a baseline to evaluate progress as vaccine recommendations are implemented.

Several factors predicted HPV vaccine uptake among MSM, including having received a hepatitis vaccine and having visited a health care provider in the past year. An additional predictor was disclosure of same-sex sexual attraction/behavior to a healthcare provider, an important precursor to receiving care recommended specifically for MSM, particularly those aged 22–26 years for whom HPV vaccination is recommended [5,12]. HIV-infected MSM have two indications for receiving HPV vaccine and, therefore, the higher uptake among this group is encouraging; accumulating data show that HPV vaccine has good immunogenicity in this group [13,14].

In the United States, data on HPV vaccine coverage in adolescents are provided by the National Immunization Survey-Teen; in 2011, an estimated 8.3% of boys aged 13–17 years received ≥1 dose of HPV vaccine [15]. This increased to 20.8% in 2012 [16]. Ideally, over time, more MSM will receive HPV vaccine before onset of sexual activity [17]. In the meantime, the fact that three-quarters of unvaccinated MSM had visited a health care provider within the past 12 months suggests that health care settings offer opportunities for HPV vaccination in this age group.

This analysis is subject to several limitations. Vaccine status is self-reported and may be subject to recall bias. Furthermore, the number of doses of HPV vaccine was not assessed in NHBS and thus vaccine series completion could not be evaluated. In addition, venue-based sampling does not represent all MSM, particularly those who live in rural areas, who do not disclose male–male sexual behavior, or who may not frequent venues where MSM congregate.

Improving HPV vaccine uptake in this population could be facilitated by MSM having access to a healthcare provider who provides vaccine, being willing to disclose same-sex sexual attraction/behavior, and accepting recommended vaccinations. Most MSM in this analysis, including three out of four unvaccinated MSM, had visited a health care provider recently, and two out of three had disclosed. A systematic review revealed that although HPV knowledge was generally poor among MSM, most had positive attitudes about the vaccine and, in two studies, believed it would be “good, safe, smart, easy, important, and harmless” [1820]. Vaccinations recommended by ACIP generally are covered by health insurance.

5. Conclusion

All young MSM should have the opportunity to receive HPV vaccine. Although ideally it should be administered before onset of sexual activity, quadrivalent HPV vaccine is recommended for U.S. MSM through age 26 years. Health care settings offer opportunities to increase coverage in this population.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by CDC. The authors thank all of the 2011 NHBS participants, Nevin Krishna, Brooke Hoots, and Teresa Finlayson (Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention, CDC) for their assistance.

Appendix A. Members of the NHBS Study Group

Atlanta, GA: Jianglan White, Jeff Todd, Greg Bautista; Baltimore, MD: Colin Flynn, Danielle German; Boston, MA: Maura Miminos, Rose Doherty, Chris Wittke; Chicago, IL: Nikhil Prachand, Nanette Benbow; Dallas, TX: Sharon Melville, Shane Sheu, Alicia Novoa; Denver, CO: Mark Thrun, Alia Al-Tayyib, Ralph Wilmoth; Detroit, MI: Vivian Griffin, Emily Higgins, Karen MacMaster; Houston, TX: Marcia Wolverton, Hafeez Rehman, Paige Padgett; Los Angeles, CA: Trista Bingham, Ekow Kwa Sey; Miami, FL: Marlene LaLota, Lisa Metsch, David Forrest; Nassau-Suffolk, NY: Bridget J. Anderson, Carol-Ann Watson, Lou Smith; New Orleans, LA: DeAnn Gruber, William T. Robinson, Narquis Barak; New York City, NY: Alan Neaigus, Kathleen H. Reilly, Travis Wendel; Newark, NJ: Barbara Bolden, Afework Wogayehu, Henry Godette; Philadelphia, PA: Kathleen A. Brady, Andrea Sifferman; San Diego, CA: Vanessa Miguelino-Keasling, Al Velasco, Veronica Tovar; San Francisco, CA: H. Fisher Raymond; San Juan, PR: Sandra Miranda De León, Yadira Rolón-Colón, Melissa Marzan; Seattle, WA: Tom Jaenicke, Hanne Thiede, Richard Burt; Washington, DC: Manya Magnus, Irene Kuo, Tiffany West; CDC: Behavioral Surveillance Team, Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, CDC.

Footnotes

Disclosures: No conflicts of interest were declared. All authors materially participated in the research and article preparation, and have approved the final article. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Contributor Information

Elissa Meites, Email: emeites@cdc.gov.

Lauri E. Markowitz, Email: lmarkowitz@cdc.gov.

Gabriela Paz-Bailey, Email: gpazbailey@cdc.gov.

Alexandra M. Oster, Email: aoster@cdc.gov.

References

  • 1.Machalek DA, Poynten M, Jin F, Fairley CK, Farnsworth A, Garland SM, et al. Anal human papillomavirus infection and associated neoplastic lesions in men who have sex with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2012 May;13(5):487–500. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70080-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Llata E, Stenger M, Bernstein K, Guerry S, Kerani R, Pugsley R, et al. Prevalence of genital warts among sexually transmitted disease clinic patients – Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance Network, United States, January 2010 to December 2011. Sex Transm Dis. 2014 Feb;41(2):89–93. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Silverberg MJ, Lau B, Justice AC, Engels E, Gill MJ, Goedert JJ, et al. Risk of anal cancer in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected individuals in North America. Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Apr;54(7):1026–34. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir1012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Palefsky JM, Giuliano AR, Goldstone S, Moreira ED, Jr, Aranda C, Jessen H, et al. HPV vaccine against anal HPV infection and anal intraepithelial neoplasia. N Engl J Med. 2011 Oct;365(17):1576–85. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1010971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommendations on the use of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine in males – Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2011. MMWR. 2011 Dec;60(50):1705–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Markowitz LE, Dunne EF, Saraiya M, Chesson HW, Curtis CR, Gee J, et al. Human papillomavirus vaccination. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2014 Aug;63(RR-05):1–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Curtis CR, Dorell C, Yankey D, Jeyarajah J, Chesson H, Saraiya M, et al. National human papillomavirus vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13–17 years – National Immunization Survey-Teen, United States, 2011. MMWR. 2014 Sep;63(Suppl 2):61–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Meites E, Krishna NK, Markowitz LE, Oster AM. Health care use and opportunities for human papillomavirus vaccination among young men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Dis. 2013 Feb;40(2):154–7. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31827b9e89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Finlayson TJ, Le B, Smith A, Bowles K, Cribbin M, Miles I, et al. HIV risk, prevention, and testing behaviors among men who have sex with men – National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System, 21 U.S. cities, United States, 2008. MMWR. 2011 Oct;60(14):1–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.MacKellar DA, Gallagher KM, Finlayson T, Sanchez T, Lansky A, Sullivan PS. Surveillance of HIV risk and prevention behaviors of men who have sex with men – a national application of venue-based, time-space sampling. Public Health Rep. 2007 Suppl;122(1):39–47. doi: 10.1177/00333549071220S107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wejnert C, Le B, Rose CE, Oster AM, Smith AJ, Zhu J, et al. HIV infection and awareness among men who have sex with men – 20 cities, United States, 2008 and 2011. PLOS ONE. 2013;8(10):e76878. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Workowski KA, Berman S Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines. MMWR. 2010;59:1–110. doi: 10.1086/511430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wilkin T, Lee JY, Lensing SY, Stier EA, Goldstone SE, Berry JM, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of the quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine in HIV-1-infected men. J Infect Dis. 2010 Oct;202(8):1246–53. doi: 10.1086/656320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Denny LA, Franceschi S, de Sanjose S, Heard I, Moscicki AB, Palefsky J. Human papillomavirus, human immunodeficiency virus and immunosuppression. Vaccine. 2012 Nov;(Suppl 5):F168–74. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National and state vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13–17 years – United States, 2011. MMWR. 2012 Aug;61(34):671–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National and state vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13–17 years – United States, 2012. MMWR. 2013 Aug;62(34):685–93. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zou H, Tabrizi SN, Grulich AE, Garland SM, Hocking JS, Bradshaw CS, et al. Early acquisition of anogenital human papillomavirus among teenage men who have sex with men. J Infect Dis. 2014 Mar;209(5):642–51. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nadarzynski T, Smith H, Richardson D, Jones CJ, Llewellyn CD. Human papillomavirus and vaccine-related perceptions among men who have sex with men: a systematic review. Sex Transm Infect. 2014 Apr; doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2013-051357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2013-051357Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 19.Wheldon CW, Daley EM, Buhi ER, Nyitray AG, Giuliano AR. Health beliefs and attitudes associated with HPV vaccine intention among young gay and bisexual men in the Southeastern United States. Vaccine. 2011 Oct;29(45):8060–5. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.08.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gutierrez B, Jr, Leung A, Jones KT, Smith P, Silverman R, Frank I, et al. Acceptability of the human papillomavirus vaccine among urban adolescent males. Am J Men’s Health. 2013 Jan;7(1):27–36. doi: 10.1177/1557988312456697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES