Introduction
Training in the management of substance-related and addictive disorders in psychiatry has been disproportionately limited in psychiatric residency training programs, compared with other major psychiatric disorders. Few psychiatry residents received training in addictions unless elective experiences were pursued. Moreover, a lack of experienced faculty, negative attitudes toward addicted patients, lack of adequate curriculum and poorly defined educational goals and requirements have been identified as factors leading to the lack of training in substance-related and addictive disorders.1,2 With the further recognition that treatment outcomes improve when patients with concurrent addiction and mental disorders receive integrated care, rather than separate treatment in a sequential or parallel manner,3–8 it becomes increasingly evident that the knowledge, attitudes and diagnostic– management skills for all new psychiatrists will need to become more sophisticated in the area of substance-related and addictive disorders.
In 1997, the initial Curriculum Guidelines for Residency Training of Psychiatrists in Substance-Related Disorders was published by the Canadian Psychiatric Association (CPA) as a position paper.9 The stated goals of those guidelines were as follows, to:
improve the knowledge, skills, and attitudes of psychiatrists about substance-related disorders to a level comparable to other mental disorders;
ensure better evaluation and treatment of alcohol and other substance abusers;
foster recognition of the impact of comorbid substance abuse on the treatment and evolution of other physical and psychiatric conditions;
prevent marginalization and excessive demedicalization of clinical services to substance abusers;
ensure that psychiatrists develop an understanding of the spectrum of health care systems providing services to substance abusers; and
foster advanced training and subspecialization of a greater number of psychiatrists to develop clinical services, teaching, and research in substance abuse.p 1–2
However, without these proposed guidelines9 being incorporated into the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) Specialty Training Requirements (STR) in Psychiatry,10 curriculum changes were left up to individual programs to voluntarily implement, and relatively little change occurred.
To attempt to begin to address the training deficiency in substance-related and addictive disorders, in 2007, the RCPSC released the new STR in Psychiatry10 outlining more specific expectations in training for psychiatry residents. While the Objectives of Training (OTR) in Psychiatry mentions alcohol and other substance use disorders (SUDs), it does not currently include gambling disorder or conditions for further study (for example, Internet gaming disorder), which we, the authors of this position paper, would recommend including to reflect the changes in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), terminology and trends in addiction treatments. Proficiencies in substance-related and addictive disorders are currently part of the training requirements for all Canadian psychiatry residents who began their training as of July 1, 2009, to be realized during the five years of residency training, with no less than the equivalent of a one-month clinical experience evaluated separately from other rotations occurring sometime in the postgraduate years (PGYs) 2 to 5. Although it is unlikely that a one-month experience would fully allow the resident to realize the proficiencies expected, the one-month experience, coupled with seminars, should provide an adequate foundation for residents in addictions to be augmented by further training experiences and ongoing continuing medical education (CME) to meet the requirements.
The OTR–STR as they apply to training in substance-related and addictive disorders include the following:
Supervised experience in the treatment of patients with substance-related and addictive disorders in various settings. A learning portfolio or log should be maintained and reviewed by the program director. This experience must be undertaken as a discrete rotation of no less than one month or incorporated as a longitudinal experience (at any time during PGY-2 to -5) of no less than the equivalent of one month. This must be documented and evaluated separately from other rotations.
Availability of a selective rotation in substance-related and addictive disorders of no less than three months, but preferably six months, during senior psychiatric residency training (PGY-4 to -5), to develop advanced knowledge (definition in Table 1) in addiction psychiatry.
Proficient (definition in Table 1) clinical knowledge, skills and attitudes appropriate to their practice in substance-related and addictive disorders.
Function effectively as consultants, integrating all of the CanMEDS roles to provide optimal, ethical and patient-centred medical care by identifying and appropriately responding to those patients with addiction comorbidity.
Demonstrate introductory knowledge (definition in Table 1) in assessing suitability for prescribing and delivery of motivational interviewing (MI).
Table 1.
Variable | Definition |
---|---|
| |
Introductory knowledge | Able to recognize, identify, or describe principles. |
Working knowledge | Able to demonstrate core aspects of psychiatry, such as basic interviewing, problem formulation and treatment. The resident can understand the scientific literature. |
Proficient | Able to demonstrate working knowledge enhanced by a developmental, cultural, and lifespan perspective, allowing detailed interviewing and bio-psychosocial problem formulation with capacity to teach, consult, assess and manage referrals. The resident can critically review and apply the scientific literature relevant to this competency. |
Advanced | Detailed and sophisticated understanding, which is multimodal and interdisciplinary, leading to advanced teaching and consultation on complex referrals. The resident has a detailed knowledge of, and is able to apply, the scientific literature, adapting and extrapolating as required. |
The curriculum in substance-related and addictive disorders requires the minimum of a one-month equivalent clinical rotation and seminars to address the clinical knowledge, skills and attitude requirements that would enable the general psychiatrist to be proficient in their management of patients with primary or concurrent addictions. Clinical rotations can be discrete one-month rotations, longitudinal experiences or a blended version of these two options, occurring any time in psychiatric residency training after the PGY-1 year. Based on program and resident-derived factors, each training program will need to determine the optimal positioning of the clinical rotation in addictions. The flexibility in the timing and duration of the clinical rotation, however, could lead to significant variability in the foundational knowledge and skills that each resident would possess at that time in their training, a factor that would need to be considered by program directors when establishing rotations. Junior residents may be more proficient in the medical management of intoxication and withdrawal states, but less proficient in assessment, diagnostic and psychotherapeutic practices for these chronic disorders, potentially limiting the impact of early addiction training experiences on future psychiatric practice. Positive experiences in earlier training, though, may set the stage for psychiatry residents to seek out selective rotations in addiction psychiatry in their senior training years, helping to establish future leaders in addiction psychiatry. Senior residents may benefit more from addiction training experiences, given their greater exposure to psychotherapy training, enhanced assessment skills and likely better established future practice plans, allowing them to better focus on learning in areas most applicable to their future practices (for example, screening and brief intervention skills for consultation-liaison psychiatrists, MI and other engagement skills for inpatient psychiatrists, or use of evidence-based harm reduction approaches for assertive community treatment team psychiatrists working with chronic psychotic disorders), but residency training programs may have greater difficulty integrating these experiences in the senior years, owing to limited availability of concurrent psychiatric and addictive disorder training centres and limited access to primary addiction services. Longitudinal experiences may bridge this divide but also be difficult to ensure a consistent training experience involving addiction psychiatry role models and evidence-based practices.
To address the changes reflected in the RCPSC OTR–STR, a working group with national representation and expertise in addictions was sought to develop a position paper on education in addiction psychiatry and offer updated curriculum guidelines for psychiatric residency training in substance-related and addictive disorders. In the first of this two-part position paper,11 key clinical aspects of addiction psychiatry were highlighted, with general recommendations for psychiatry education. The core goals and objectives of this, the second part of this position paper, are to review and describe clinical content, potential strategies to changing curriculum and the means to develop clinical experiences in addictions so that psychiatry training programs can meet the RCPSC OTR–STR requirements set out for addictions. The recommendations are based on the prior CPA position paper,9 resource manuals,12,13 book chapters,14 practice guidelines,15 research papers published on medical and postgraduate education in addictions16–23 and major textbooks.24–27 From this position paper, it is hoped that residency programs in Canada will be able to train general psychiatrists to be able to competently manage patients with concurrent or primary addictive disorders in psychiatric practice in an evidence-based fashion with appropriate optimism for improvement.
Recommendations
The section on detailed clinical content will delineate areas of knowledge to be covered in substance-related and addictive disorders involving substance effects, biopsychosocial-spiritual understanding of the SUDs and their overlap with major mental disorders, addiction epidemiology, assessment and diagnostic skills for substance-related and addictive disorders with concurrent disorders, recognition of stage of change, choice of most appropriate treatment setting, skills in treatment delivery, awareness of community resources, the role of the family in recovery and attitudinal components. The section on detailed seminar content will describe content and the means to develop a skill-based interactive curriculum and its potential timing or sequencing. The section on clinical experiences will describe potential options for programs to meet the required one-month clinical rotation experience in addictions, with the pros and cons of the potential approaches and potential administrative needs.
Detailed Clinical Content for Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders Curriculum
Canadian psychiatric residents are expected to develop proficient clinical knowledge, skills and attitudes appropriate to their practice to assess, manage and, if necessary, appropriately refer patients who present with primary or comorbid substance-related and addictive disorders. Knowledge, skills and attitudes need to reflect appreciation of the continuum of use–involvement in substances and behaviours associated with substance-related and addictive disorders, ranging from abstinence and limited use to at-risk use, to the different severities of substance use–gambling disorders.
It is recommended that clinical knowledge, skills and attitudes in addiction and related disorders involve the following domains, and are further outlined in Table 2.
Table 2.
Variable | PGY-1 | PGY-2 to -3 | PGY-4 to 5a |
---|---|---|---|
Knowledge | |||
Substance effects | WK | Prof | Adv |
Biopsychosocial understanding | WK | Prof | Adv |
Epidemiology | Intro | WK | Prof and (or) Adv |
Community resources | Intro | WK | Prof and (or) Adv |
Skills | |||
Screening | WK | Prof | Adv |
Assessment and diagnosis | WK | Prof | Adv |
Management of intoxication and or withdrawal | WK | Prof | Adv |
Patient placement | Intro | WK | Prof and (or) Adv |
Concurrent disorder treatment | WK | Prof | Adv |
Pharmacotherapy | Intro | WK | Prof and (or) Adv |
Psychotherapy | |||
Brief interventions | WK | Prof | Adv |
MI | Intro | WK | Prof and (or) Adv |
CBT and (or) relapse prevention | Intro | WK | Prof and (or) Adv |
TSF and contingency management | Intro | WK | Prof and (or) Adv |
Family | Intro | WK | Prof and (or) Adv |
Psychiatry three- to six-month selective training and (or) fellowship training
Adv = advanced; Intro = introductory knowledge; Prof = proficient; TSF = 12-step facilitation; WK = working knowledge
Substance Effects
Proficient knowledge of the mechanism of action for the primary substances encountered in clinical practice, including alcohol, nicotine–tobacco, caffeine, cannabis, sedative–hypnotics (benzodiazepines, barbiturates, gamma-hydroxybutyric acid), stimulants (cocaine, amphetamines, and so-called designer stimulants), opiates, N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonists (phencyclidine and ketamine), inhalants, steroids and hallucinogens (classical and designer hallucinogens). This would represent a foundation to understanding how addiction develops and the basis for different intoxication and (or) withdrawal syndromes.
Proficient knowledge of substance intoxication and (or) withdrawal syndromes enabling their identification and management, whether in an acute setting or in the community. This would require skills to complete a safety assessment for inpatient, compared with outpatient, withdrawal treatment, managing medications and motivational components.
Working knowledge of the effects of chronic substance use on the development and perpetuation of medical complications (for example, hepatitis and human immunodeficiency virus) and comorbid mental disorders.
Working knowledge of the similarities and differences between behavioural and substance-related addictions.
Developing a Biopsychosocial-spiritual Understanding of Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders and Their Overlap With Major Psychiatric Disorders
Proficient knowledge of the critical role of the brain’s extended dopamine reward pathway as the key mediator of the neurobiological basis for how substance-related and addictive disorders develop incentive salience for future behaviour choice, compared with natural rewards, balanced with the understanding of other biopsychosocial-spiritual factors contributing to risk and resilience, including drug type, delivery method, dosing, age of exposure, genetics, underlying psychiatric disorders and personality traits, expectancies from use, environment, history of abuse or neglect, peer use, availability, cultural and (or) religious and (or) spiritual factors, and economics.
Working knowledge of how psychosocial-spiritual risk factors may contribute to the initial use of addictive substances and behaviours, as well as protective factors, but as involvement progresses to dependence, how, with chronic reinforcement, a more biological basis is established. This knowledge would help frame the basis for choosing different strategies to address the continuum of substance-related and addictive disorders from at-risk use to the most severe forms of addiction and to understand all the components to the recovery process.
Working knowledge of how common comorbid mental disorders have overlapping neurobiological and psychosocial-spiritual determinants contributing to the development and perpetuation of both disorders.
Addiction Epidemiology
Working knowledge of the prevalence of each of the substance-related and addictive disorders, with the differences between populations based on age, sex, location and ethnicity.
Proficient knowledge of the comorbidity with the spectrum of major mental (including mood, anxiety, psychotic, cognitive, sleep, attention-deficit hyperactivity, eating, personality and somatic and [or] pain) and medical disorders.
Working knowledge of developing trends in substance-related and addictive disorders related to availability, perception of harm, and other factors that promote and protect from their development.
Working knowledge of the different trajectories and predictors for the course of substance-related and addictive disorders. Understanding how access to evidence-based treatments can change outcomes and awareness of the phenomenon of natural recovery, to help build appropriate optimism for change.
Assessment and Diagnosis
Proficient knowledge and skills in the identification of substance-related and addictive disorders. This would include knowing how to elicit history indicative of substance-related and addictive disorders, awareness of typical signs and symptoms that would prompt more in-depth screening, and the importance of screening for tobacco use, prescription drugs, over-the-counter medications, and behavioural addictions, in addition to alcohol and illicit drugs. Also, residents should know the diagnostic criteria for substance-related and addictive disorders (DSM-5), but also definitions of addiction as defined by national and international societies (for example, the American Society of Addiction Medicine and the American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry).
Working knowledge of the use of screening instruments for SUDs (for example, the Cut down, Annoyed, Guilty, Eye-opener [commonly referred to as CAGE] questionnaire,28 the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test [commonly referred to as AUDIT]29 for alcohol; Drug Abuse Screening Test [commonly referred to as DAST]30 for drugs) and their minimum cut-off values. Introductory knowledge of other screening instrument, such as the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs Short Screener (commonly referred to as GAIN-SS)31 and more comprehensive instruments to thoroughly evaluate the impact of addictive behaviours (for example, Addiction Severity Index).32
Proficient knowledge in the use of the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol, Revised (CIWA-Ar).33
Working knowledge of the role of laboratory screening, urine drug screening and other forms of drug screening with their potential limitations.
Proficient knowledge and skills to reasonably differentiate substance-induced psychiatric symptoms from independent mental disorders and to understand their clinical relevance.
Working knowledge of common comorbid conditions when one disorder is identified (for example, problematic sexual behaviour with stimulant addictions; anxiety, depressive and sleep disorders with sedative–hypnotic dependence).
Stage of Change and Treatment Planning
Proficient knowledge of the different stages of change reflective of the transtheoretical model34 and how it is assessed.
Proficient knowledge of how stage of change can evolve and may be different for each mental and (or) substance-related and addictive disorder.
Proficient knowledge and skills in how to change a treatment approach based on stage of change, with at least working knowledge (but preferably proficient knowledge and skills) of MI techniques to change addictive behaviours.
Proficient knowledge and skill in the use of specific brief interventions, with at least working knowledge (but preferably proficient knowledge and skills) in MI, cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) and (or) relapse prevention, and (or) 12-step facilitation.
Working knowledge of contingency management as a method to create short-term incentives toward drug use reduction and abstinence.
Working knowledge in determining appropriate addiction treatment as it relates to setting (for example, outpatient, residential and inpatient), minimum durations and types of providers.
Working knowledge of how to select best treatments and modify this based on response (for example, use of the American Society of Addiction Medicine Patient Placement Criteria [ASAM PPC-2R]).35
Working knowledge and skill in the use of pharmacotherapy for substance-related and addictive disorders, including those for alcohol withdrawal, opioid substitution, treatment of alcohol use disorder (for example, naltrexone, disulfiram and acamprosate) and nicotine use disorder (for example, nicotine replacement therapy, bupropion and varenicline) and tapering off of opioids and sedative–hypnotics. Proficient knowledge and skill in the use of pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy in the context of comorbid substance-related and addictive disorders with other mental disorders.
Community Resources
Working knowledge of mutual help (for example, Alcoholics Anonymous and Rational Recovery) and how to facilitate involvement in these recovery resources (for example, 12-step facilitation).
Working knowledge of the spectrum of other community resources available to treat or to help manage substance-related and addictive disorders particular to their community, including evidence-based harm reduction approaches, detoxification facilities, outpatient treatment options and residential treatment centres.
Role of Family and (or) Community
Working knowledge of the impact of substance-related and addictive disorders on the addicted person’s family and community.
Working knowledge and skills to support and involve the person’s family and community in the recovery process from psychoeducation to couples and (or) family therapy.
The knowledge and skills would aim to incorporate strategies to further tailor treatments with special populations (for example, Aboriginal peoples) as they apply to potential differences related to age, sex and ethnocultural factors.
Attitudes
Personal awareness of potential biases held toward patients with substance-related and addictive disorders, with development of empathy for their condition.
Development of appropriate optimism for change and improvement over time in people with substance-related and addictive disorders, while recognizing that addiction requires an approach reflective of a chronic disorder.
Seminar Organization for Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders Curriculum:
A skills-based curriculum that is interactive and experiential in nature should be emphasized to progressively increase knowledge, skills and attitudes toward patients along the continuum, from at-risk use to the different severities of substance use–gambling disorders. The curriculum would recognize the lifelong process of learning, building from medical school and reinforced through CME. The timing and duration of the substance-related and addictive disorders curriculum could be incorporated into current seminars or could stand alone, depending on the needs of each individual program and their available resources. Incorporating addictions curriculum into current seminars (an integrated format) may facilitate greater teaching and discussion around comorbidities, where both teaching staff and residents may enhance their knowledge and skill sets in addictions, but may limit their time available for discussion of specific evidence-based addiction practices and may come at the expense of consistency. Standalone seminars may better allow for in-depth discussion of addictions topics and be able to sequence education in addictions to better match trainees foundational knowledge, skills and attitudes as their training progresses, but potentially limit incorporation of practices with patients presenting with prominent psychiatric syndromes. It is suggested that the curriculum in PGY-1 or -2, a minimum of three hours of separate or the equivalent in integrated seminar time, be dedicated to foundational knowledge in addiction psychiatry and introduce brief interventions. In PGY-2 to -5, it is suggested that a minimum of six hours of separate or the equivalent in integrated seminar time be dedicated to advanced principles of addiction psychiatry. In PGY-2 to -5, occurring separately, integrated into existing psychotherapy seminars, or part of the addictions lectures, it is suggested that an introductory seminar equivalent to a minimum of three hours be included introducing core concepts behind MI, relapse prevention, and 12-step facilitation that, ideally, incorporate case scenarios or real and (or) simulated patients for practice of techniques and feedback. More detailed descriptions of seminar content and CME are included in the Supplemental Materials section.
Supervised Clinical Experience Organization for Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders Curriculum
The mandatory one-month supervised clinical experience to meet the requirements for training in substance-related and addictive disorders could be met by an intensive one-month rotation, a longitudinal rotation or a blended and (or) time-limited rotation. Each would require at least one supervising psychiatrist with certification, training or adequate experience in addiction psychiatry or addiction medicine. Preferably rotation experiences would involve multiple treatment types and settings that are inclusive of diversity as it relates to sex, socioeconomic status and ethnicity. Ideally, rotations would provide opportunities that include both in- and outpatient settings, where structured outpatient experiences (for example, addiction day treatment settings and established outpatient clinics) should be emphasized to best impart appropriate optimism for change in patients with addictions and related disorders and followed longitudinally. Inpatient rotations would likely ensure patient contact, but could limit seeing how patients function longitudinally and may be prone to seeing the most recalcitrant (or so-called revolving-door) patients that could inadvertently promote a sense of therapeutic futility, turning residents away from treating this population.2 Unstructured outpatient experiences can be prone to frequent patient nonattendance, again inadvertently making this less enticing to residents to seek as an area of future practice. A learning portfolio should be maintained by the resident, demonstrating an equivalent of 80 to 120 hours of direct and indirect patient-based time, describing skills developed involving patients across the lifespan, involving various mental health and addiction diagnoses to meet the RCPSC requirements. A greater duration (for example, three months) to the supervised clinical experience in addiction psychiatry should be encouraged, given that one month, although meeting RCPSC requirements, quite likely is inadequate to develop the proficiencies outlined in the OTR–STR. Each potential supervised clinical experience option has relative strengths and weaknesses. Descriptions of potential rotation structures are provided in our Supplemental Materials section.
In addition to how the addiction psychiatry experience is organized, it is recommended that trainees observe mutual help meetings (for example, Alcoholics Anonymous) as part of their one-month supervised clinical experience. They should visit and be aware of community resources available to patients with addictions, so that they can appropriately use these resources in the remainder of their residency training and future clinical practice. Most hospitals have open Alcoholics Anonymous or Narcotics Anonymous meetings on site, and attendance by trainees could be negotiated with the leaders of these meetings.
An elective in addiction psychiatry of at least three months, but preferably six months’ duration, needs to be available for PGY-4 to -5 psychiatry residents. Not all programs may have this opportunity available locally. If a selective is not available for whatever reason then arrangements should be made with other programs to allow residents to take the selective at a different site. The selective rotation would be designed to help senior psychiatry residents further develop proficiency in the assessment and management of patients with primary and comorbid substance-related and addictive disorders; further modify physician attitudes toward addicted patients; and allow trainees to better develop appropriate skill sets to routinely and competently manage such patients in their practices after they graduate. A three- or six-month selective would more easily allow the attainment of proficiency in substance-related and addictive disorders set out in the OTR–STR, while a selective up to 12 months would allow for advanced skills to be developed, and potentially with adequate practice experience or fellowship training to meet addictions certification standards. A selective could also provide the opportunity to fully participate in an inpatient and (or) residential addiction treatment program, including follow-up and (or) aftercare. Programs with limited faculty with training in addiction psychiatry should prioritize selective training for identified interested residents in their program to help with faculty development.
Administration and Evaluation
With training in substance-related and addictive disorders being formalized within the RCPSC OTR–STR, all Canadian psychiatry residency training programs will need to appoint a training coordinator. Ideally, the appointed coordinator will be a psychiatrist certified in addiction medicine or addiction psychiatry, have fellowship training in, or extensive practice experience involving, evidence-based addiction psychiatry and (or) medicine. The coordinator would be responsible for developing and (or) organizing the seminar content, as well as for organizing what model is to be used for the supervised clinical experience in substance-related and addictive disorders. Skilled psychiatry preceptors would need to be identified and (or) developed to supervise residents and provide the didactic teaching. Although supervised substance-related and addictive disorders training may be available from other specialties, such as family medicine or community health, the roles of these people would need to be supplementary, as supervision to meet RSCPC requirements needs to be primarily by a psychiatrist. Training of skilled faculty may well need to be a priority for those programs lacking available and skilled supervisors. Resident interest in addiction psychiatry should be sought and identified early by residency training program directors, with regular meetings scheduled with the appointed coordinator for substance-related and addictive disorders thereafter to help foster faculty growth and development. The appointed coordinators would also be responsible for developing a common evaluation form addressing the CanMEDS roles for all residents in the training program to document their meeting RSCPC requirements. A learning portfolio documenting the 80 to 120 hours of direct and indirect patient-based time in substance-related and addictive disorders would need to be reviewed by the coordinator in concert with the postgraduate training director. Affiliations with off-site residential, day treatment and outpatient substance-related and addictive disorders treatment programs may need to be established if there currently is a lack of on-site programs capable of providing the described structured addiction training experiences. If seminars in substance-related and addictive disorders are planned to be incorporated into existing seminars for other major psychiatric disorders where instruction is provided by psychiatrists without addiction psychiatry training backgrounds, a train-the-trainer program may need to be developed for those instructors.
Future Directions
Currently, fellowship opportunities in addiction psychiatry are available at some Canadian training sites. A potential pathway toward subspecialty status for addiction psychiatry in Canada at this time could be through initially acquiring diploma recognition by the RCPSC. It is hoped that the inclusion of formal training requirements in addictions and related disorders for psychiatry residency training programs will eventually lead to an expansion of psychiatrists with more extensive skill sets in addiction psychiatry and the push toward subspecialization.36 Current training requirements for subspecialization are available in the United States via the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), which could be applied to the Canadian context in the future.
For the new psychiatry subspecialties of child and adolescent psychiatry, geriatric psychiatry and forensic psychiatry, it is suggested that specific training content be developed in substance-related and addictive disorders for each of these three subspecialties to be incorporated into their fellowship year(s).
Currently, Canadian psychiatrists seeking validation for a specialized practice have availed themselves of numerous options. Subspecialty Board Certification in Addiction Psychiatry for holders of a US Board Certification in Psychiatry is valid for 10 years, subject to Maintenance of Competence activities, to be considered for renewal by examination on completion of an ACGME fellowship in addition psychiatry in the PGY-5 or later year. Applicants not meeting the aforementioned criteria have opted to meet the criteria for Diplomate status from the American Board of Addiction Medicine (DABAM), also valid for 10 years. Currently, two Canadian sites (Vancouver and Toronto) have training programs accredited by the DABAM. A third option has been to apply for an International Certification in Addiction Medicine sponsored by the International Society of Addiction Medicine and recognized by the Canadian Society of Addiction Medicine.37 Internationally, the promotion of Addiction Medicine as a medical specialty is being actively pursued in the Scandinavian countries, as well as in Australia and New Zealand.
Given the scope of addiction problems in Canada across the lifespan, comorbidity with major mental disorders being the norm, and the lack of widespread availability of addiction providers, especially in mental health settings, the further development of psychiatric residency training in substance-related and addictive disorders needs to be a priority for training programs to improve Canadian psychiatric care. The new training requirements provide an opportunity for training programs to begin to address the often unmet needs of concurrent disorder patients, by enhancing the competencies of our future psychiatrists, and, it is hoped, these updated curriculum guidelines will facilitate their implementation.
Supplemental Materials
Note: It is the policy of the Canadian Psychiatric Association to review each position paper, policy statement and clinical practice guideline every five years after publication or last review. Any such document that has been published more than five years ago and does not explicitly state it has been reviewed and retained as an official document of the CPA, either with revisions or as originally published, should be considered as a historical reference document only.
References
- 1.Gunderson EW, Levin FR, Levounis P. Medical education. In: Galanter M, Kleber D, editors. Textbook of substance abuse treatment. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Publishing Inc; 2008. pp. 665–679. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Shorter D, Dermatis H. Addiction training in general psychiatry residency: a national survey. Subst Abus. 2012;33(4):392–394. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2011.638737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Brown RA, Evans DM, Miller IW, et al. Cognitive-behavioral treatment for depression in alcoholism. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1997;65(5):715–726. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.65.5.715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Center for Substance Abuse Treatment . Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Rockville (MD): Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2005. Substance abuse treatment for persons with co-occurring disorders. Series 42 (DHHS publication no. [SMA] 05–3922) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Drake RE, Mercer-McFadden C, Mueser KT, et al. Review of integrated mental health and substance abuse treatment for patients with dual disorders. Schizophr Bull. 1998;24(4):589–608. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mueser KT, Noordsy DL, Drake RE, et al. Integrated treatment for dual disorders: a guide to effective practice. New York (NY): Guilford Press; 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Weiss RD, Griffin ML, Greenfield SF, et al. Group therapy for patients with bipolar disorder and substance dependence: results of a pilot study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2000;61(5):361–367. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v61n0507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ziedonis DM, Krejci J. Dual recovery therapy: blending psychosocial therapies for depression and addiction. In: Westermeyer JJ, Weiss RD, Ziedonis DM, editors. Integrated treatment for mood and substance disorders. Baltimore (MD): John Hopkins University Press; 2003. pp. 90–121. [Google Scholar]
- 9.el-Guebaly N, Garneau Y. Curriculum guidelines for residency training of psychiatrists in substance-related disorders [position paper] CPA Bulletin. 1997;29(5 Insert):1–6. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) [Internet] Ottawa (ON): RCPSC; [year of publication unknown] [date cited unknown]. Available from: http://www.royalcollege.ca/rc/faces/oracle/webcenter/portalapp/pages/ibd.jspx?_afrLoop=17998106498490405#!%40%40%3F_afrLoop%3D17998106498490405%26_adf.ctrl-state%3Dg57c6a6vr_145. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fleury G, Milin R, Crockford D, et al. Training in substance-related and addictive disorders, part 1: overview of clinical practice and general recommendations [position paper] Can J Psychiatry. 2015;60(12 online):1–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.American Psychiatric Association . Resource manual for alcohol and other drug abuse education in psychiatry. Washington (DC): US Department of Health and Human Services; 1987. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ballon B. University of Toronto postgraduate psychiatry clinical training in addiction psychiatry. Toronto (ON): University of Toronto; 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Crockford D, el-Guebaly N. Addiction psychiatry. In: Leverette JS, Hnatko GS, Persad E, et al., editors. Approaches to postgraduate education in psychiatry in Canada: what educators and residents need to know. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Psychiatric Association; 2009. pp. 167–182. [Google Scholar]
- 15.American Psychiatric Association Practice guidelines for the treatment of patients with substances use disorders, 2nd edition. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164:1–123. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dove HW. Postgraduate education and training in addiction disorders. Defining core competencies. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1999;22(2):481–488. xi. doi: 10.1016/s0193-953x(05)70088-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.el-Guebaly N, Toews J, Lockyer J, et al. Medical education in substance-related disorders: components and outcome. Addiction. 2000;95:949–957. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.95694911.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fleming M, Barry K, Davis A, et al. Medical education about substance abuse: changes in curriculum and faculty between 1976 and 1992. Acad Med. 1994;69(5):362–369. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199405000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Galanter M, Kaufman E, Schnoll S, et al. Postgraduate medical fellowship training in alcoholism and drug abuse: national consensus standards. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1991;17(1):1–12. doi: 10.3109/00952999108992805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Halikas JA. Model curriculum for alcohol and drug abuse training and experience during the adult psychiatry residency. 1992;1(3):222–229. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Renner JA. How to train residents to identify and treat dual diagnosis patients. Biol Psychiatry. 2004;56(10):810–816. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Renner JA, Quinones J, Wilson A. Training psychiatrists to diagnose and treat substance abuse disorders. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2005;7(5):352–359. doi: 10.1007/s11920-005-0035-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.[No authors listed] Substance abuse disorders: a psychiatric priority. Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry Committee on Alcoholism and the Addictions. Am J Psychiatry. 1991;148(10):1291–1300. doi: 10.1176/ajp.148.10.1291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: helping people change. New York (NY): Guilford Press; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ries RK, Feillin DA, Miller SC, et al., editors. Principles of addiction medicine. 4th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lowinson JH, Ruiz P, Millman RB, et al., editors. Substance abuse: a comprehensive textbook. 4th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Galanter MD, Kleber D, editors. Textbook of substance abuse treatment. 4th ed. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Publishing; 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ewing JA. Detecting alcoholism. The CAGE questionnaire. JAMA. 1984;252:1905–1907. doi: 10.1001/jama.252.14.1905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Babor TF, Grant M. From clinical research to secondary prevention: international collaboration in the development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) Alcohol Health Res World. 1989;13:371–374. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gavin DR, Ross HE, Skinner HA. Diagnostic validity of the drug abuse screening test in the assessment of DSM-III drug disorders. Br J Addict. 1989;84:301–307. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1989.tb03463.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dennis ML, Chan YF, Funk RR. Development and validation of the GAIN Short Screener (GSS) for internalizing, externalizing and substance use disorders and crime/violence problems among adolescents and adults. Am J Addict. 2006;15(Suppl 1):80–91. doi: 10.1080/10550490601006055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.McLellan AT, Luborsky L, Woody GE, et al. An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse patients. The Addiction Severity Index. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1980;168(1):26–33. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198001000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sullivan JT, Sykora K, Schneiderman J, et al. Assessment of alcohol withdrawal: the revised clinical institute withdrawal assessment for alcohol scale (CIWA-Ar) Br J Addict. 1989;84(11):1353–1357. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1989.tb00737.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983;51(3):390–395. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.51.3.390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mee-Lee D, Shulman GD, Fishman M. ASAM Patient Placement Criteria for the Treatment of Substance-Related Disorders, Second Edition-Revised (ASAM-PPC-2R) Chevy Chase (MD): American Society of Addiction Medicine; 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 36.el-Guebaly N, Crockford D, Cirone S, et al. Addiction medicine in Canada: challenges and prospects. Subst Abus. 2011;32(2):93–100. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2011.555705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.el-Guebaly N, Violato C. The international certification of addiction medicine: validating clinical knowledge across borders. Subst Abus. 2011;32:77–83. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2011.555697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) Ottawa (ON): RCPSC; Objectives in Training Requirements (OTR) in the Specialty of Psychiatry [Internet] [year of publication unknown] [date cited unknown]. Available from: http://www.royalcollege.ca/cs/groups/public/documents/document/mdaw/mdg4/~edisp/088003.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kaner EFS, Dickinson HO, Beyer F, et al. The effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care settings: a systematic review. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2009;28(3):301–323. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2009.00071.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Moyer A, Finney JW. Brief interventions for alcohol problems: factors that facilitate implementation. Alcohol Res Health. 2004;28(1):44–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.