Skip to main content
The Journal of ExtraCorporeal Technology logoLink to The Journal of ExtraCorporeal Technology
. 2009 Jun;41(2):92–96.

Carotid Artery Diameter, Plaque Morphology, and Hematocrit, in Addition to Percentage Stenosis, Predict Reduced Cerebral Perfusion Pressure during Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Mathematical Model

Richard Warwick 1, Priya Sastry 1, Eustace Fontaine 1, Michael Poullis 1
PMCID: PMC4680213  PMID: 19681307

Abstract:

Cerebral complications after cardiac surgery are a significant cause of morbidity, mortality, and financial cost. Numerous risk factors have been proposed to explain the risk of cerebral damage. Carotid artery disease has an important role. Percentage carotid artery stenosis is the only measure of carotid artery disease that is used by cardiac surgeons to determine the need for either a carotid endarterectomy and/or a higher pump perfusion pressure. Identification of patients through their carotid plaque morphology who might benefit from higher pump perfusion pressures or concomitant carotid endarterectomy may reduce cerebral morbidity and mortality. A mathematical model using finite element analysis was created to model the carotid artery vessel and its stenotic plaque. Analysis showed that the degree of carotid artery stenosis, the length of the carotid artery plaque, the diameter of the carotid artery, and the blood hematocrit all independently significantly affect the required pump perfusion pressure to main tain adequate cerebral perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The results from a mathematical model showed that carotid artery dia meter, carotid artery plaque length, and hematocrit, in addition to percentage stenosis, should be included in any thought process involving carotid artery stenosis and cardiac surgery. Estimating cerebral risk during CPB should no longer rely on only the percentage stenosis.

Keywords: carotid artery stenosis, hematocrit, cardiac surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass


Cerebral vascular accidents (CVAs) after cardiac surgery remain an important cause of mortality, morbidity, and financial cost (1). Numerous causative factors have been associated with CVAs secondary to cardiac surgery (2): ascending aortic atheromatous disease (3), carotid artery disease, age, diabetes, hypertension, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) length, previous cerebrovascular events (4), and perfusion pressure (5). Cardiac surgeons have adopted several strategies to reduce the incidence of CVAs including single episode aortic clamping (6), systemic cooling (7), ascending aortic replacement/atherectomy (8), concomitant carotid artery surgery (9), off-pump no aortic touch, axillary cannulation, and raising pump perfusion pressure (10,11). Opinion is divided on all of the above maneuvers.

Concomitant carotid artery stenting (12) or surgery (13) has been recommended in patients who have >70% occlusion of the carotid arteries as assessed by Doppler ultrasound or angiography. Raising the cerebral perfusion pressure has not produced conclusive results, although it is generally agreed that a pressure in excess of 50 mmHg is necessary to reliably protect cerebral function, in the absence of carotid artery disease, during prolonged periods of bypass (14,15).

To date, only the degree of the maximal carotid artery stenosis has been included in the estimation of CVA risk (16). This paper, through simplified mathematical fluid dynamic theory, includes the length and degree of the stenosis along with the vessel diameter and blood viscosity during bypass, so that the optimal CPB pressure and need for concomitant carotid endarterectomy can be more accurately assessed. This study was deliberately limited to studying only the above characteristics, even though it is appreciated that many other factors are important, such as temperature, oxygen delivery, collateral flow, and emboli.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A mathematical model using finite element analysis was created. Finite element analysis is a numerical technique that mathematicians and engineers use to find solutions to complex fluid or structural problems with variables in time and space, by assuming a three-dimensional (3D) structure can be analyzed in thin slices “finite element analysis.” Variables in the mathematical model included percentage carotid artery stenosis, length of plaque, carotid artery diameter, and blood viscosity. These variables were varied independently to assess their individual contribution to the required cerebral perfusion pressure to maintain adequate cerebral perfusion. Flow was assumed to be non-pulsatile, as occurs on bypass, and the venous pressure was assumed to be a constant 0 mmHg.

Mathematical Model

The stenosis in a carotid artery can be represented diagrammatically as in Figure 1. The resistance to blood flow (Rcap) combined with the cerebral vascular resistance (Rcv) represents the total resistance to flow through the carotid artery (Rtot; Equation 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Diagrammatic representation of carotid plaque. D, diameter of carotid artery; H, height of plaque; L, length of plaque.

Rtot=Rcap+Rcv (1)

The cerebral blood flow (Fcv) depends on the cardiopulmonary perfusion pressure (BPcpb) and the central venous pressure (BPcvp; Equation 2).

Fcv=(BPcpbBPcvp)/Rtot (2)

A cerebral perfusion pressure >50 mmHg is thought to be essential for cerebral protection during a significant period of bypass. This depends on BPcpb and the blood pressure drop across the carotid artery plaque (Bpcap; Equation 3).

BPcpbBPcap>50 (3)

According to Poiseuille’s formula, the resistance offered by a pipe (Rp) to a fluid of viscosity η, of length L, and diameter d is given in Equation 4.

Rp=8ηL/π(d/2)4 (4)

If an infinitely thin representative section of the carotid artery is taken (thickness δx), the resistance offered by this (Rδx) is given in Equation 5.

Rδx=δx8η/π(d/2)4 (5)

If all of these thin sections are added together to calculate the total resistance of the stenotic carotid artery (Rcap), Equation 6 results.

Rcap=δx8η/π(d/2)4 (6)

Combining and rearranging Equations 3 and 6 results in Equation 7, where Fcv is carotid blood flow.

BPcpb>50+Fcv×Rcap (7)

Plaque Model

To simplify finite element analysis, the plaque was modeled as in Figure 3, with the plaque having two defining characteristics: length and height. The leading and trailing edges of the plaque were each assumed to comprise 10% of the full plaque length. The leading and trailing edge height protrusion (y) into the carotid artery was represented by a quadratic equation (Equations 8 and 9, respectively).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Pressure drop across the plaque for carotid artery stenosis between 50% and 80%. It can be seen that carotid artery diameter has a significant effect on the required perfusion pressure because as the carotid artery diameter decreases from 10 to 5 mm, the pressure drop across the plaque markedly increases.

y=20hx/L100hx2/L2 (8)
y=h100hx2/L2 (9)

The remaining 80% of the plaque was assumed to have uniform height (y = h).

Computer Model

All calculations were performed in Excel version 7.0 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA) on a 120-mHz Pentium. A finite element thickness of 1 μm was used, which resulted in between 500 and 50,000 element analysis depending on the length of the plaque. The following mathematical formula was used in the finite element analysis to calculate the height (y) at a distance (x) along the carotid plaque.

y=|20hx/L100h(x/L)2|x<L/10+|h100h(x9L/10)×(x9L/10)L2|>(9L/10)+|h|L/10 < x < 9L/10

RESULTS

Table 1 shows the calculated perfusion pressures required during CPB to maintain a cerebral perfusion pressure of 50 mmHg for various percentages of carotid artery stenosis. For 100% carotid artery stenosis, it is impossible to calculate the required perfusion pressure because it is entirely dependent on the adequacy of the collateral circulation.

Table 1.

Required perfusion pressures for carotid artery stenosis between 0% and 100%, calculated for plaque lengths between .5 and 5 cm.

Degree of stenosis (%) Length of carotid artery plaque (cm)

.5 1 2 3 4 5
0–60 <51   <51   <52   <53   <54   <55  
65 51 52 54 55 57 59
70 52 53 57 60 64 67
75 53 57 64 71 78 85
80 58 67 84 100   120   130  
85 76 100   * * * *
90–95 * * * * * *
100

Assumed unilateral disease with no collateral flow.

*

Calculated required perfusion pressure >130 mmHg and therefore unphysiologic.

Unable to calculate because model does not take into account retrograde perfusion (see Discussion).

Figure 2 is a graphical representation of Table 1 for carotid stenosis between 40% and 90%. As expected, the greater the percentage stenosis of the carotid artery, the greater the required perfusion pressure. It can be seen that the length of the stenosis makes a significant difference to the required perfusion pressure. It can be seen that, with a carotid artery stenosis of 75%, the required perfusion pressure varies between 54 and 86 mmHg, depending on the length of the stenosis. Thus, the length of a carotid stenosis can have a significant effect on the required pump pressure to maintain adequate cerebral function.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Pressure drop across plaque in mmHg vs. percentage carotid artery stenosis. It can be seen that the length of the carotid plaque makes a significant difference to the required perfusion pressure.

Figure 3 shows the pressure drop across the plaque for carotid artery stenosis between 50% and 80%. It can be seen that, as carotid artery diameter decreases from 10 to 5 mm, the pressure drop across the plaque increases markedly. It can be seen that for a fixed 65% carotid artery stenosis, the pressure drop across the plaque varies between 4, 12, and 60 mmHg for carotid artery diameters of 10, 7.5, and 5 mm, respectively.

Figure 4 shows the influence that hematocrit has on the pressure drop across the plaque, depending on length of the carotid plaque stenosis, for a carotid artery stenosis between 50% and 90%. It can be seen that, as the hematocrit rises, the pressure drop across the plaque increases exponentially for a given carotid artery stenosis. It can be seen that for a 1-cm-long stenosis of 80%, hematocrit has virtually no effect, with the pressure drop across the plaque being <15 mmHg. However, for a 5-cm-long stenosis of 80%, the pressure drop across the plaque ranges from 35 to 90 mmHg as the hematocrit increases from 15% to 40%. Thus, the hematocrit can have a significant effect on the required pump pressure to maintain adequate cerebral perfusion.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Effect of hematocrit on the pressure drop (mmHg) across the carotid artery plaque, for a carotid artery stenosis between 50% and 90%, depends on the length (1 vs. 5 cm) of the carotid plaque stenosis. It can be seen that as the hematocrit rises, the pressure drop across the plaque increases exponentially for a given carotid artery stenosis. hct, hematocrit; L, length of plaque.

The length of the carotid artery plaque results in a significant increase in the pressure drop across the plaque. This means that the higher the hematocrit and the longer the stenosis, the higher the required perfusion pressure.

DISCUSSION

Our results showed that the percentage carotid artery stenosis, length of the carotid artery plaque, the blood hematocrit on bypass, and the diameter of the carotid artery significantly affect cerebral perfusion pressure during CPB. To date, only the percentage carotid artery stenosis has been included in the thought process of deciding the pump perfusion pressure and the need for concomitant carotid endarterectomy in patients who are about to undergo CPB.

Carotid artery diameter and plaque lengths are readily obtainable data; they are easily available from either Doppler ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography, or conventional angiography.

Some of the calculated perfusion pressure data are supraphysiologic. This implies that either the brain has to adapt to a lower blood flow or collateral cerebral perfusion must occur if cerebral damage is to be averted. Collateral cerebral flows occurs through the circle of Willis. Unfortunately, this is incompletely developed in >50% of patients (17). Thus, this cannot be relied on as a source of collateral blood flow to protect the brain during CPB, because it is only fully developed in 18% of patients (18). Of these patients, atherosclerosis causes an additional decreased functionality.

The percentage carotid artery stenosis is conventionally the only indicator of carotid artery disease that is taken into account. The data showed that, for stenotic lengths <2 cm, the required perfusion pressure does not alter significantly for carotid artery stenosis <50%, regardless of the blood hematocrit or carotid artery diameter. This correlates with previous clinical studies and present clinical practice (19). However, the length of the carotid artery stenosis can play a significant part in determining the required perfusion pressure required during CPB. The length of the stenosis plays an exponential role in determining the required perfusion pressure when the degree of the carotid artery stenosis exceeds 55%.

Blood hematocrit values are routinely monitored during bypass; thus, no additional blood samples are needed. Blood hematocrit, which partly determines viscosity, has been studied extensively during CPB. The mathematical model used in the above calculations does not take into account the potential hazardous sequelae that can result from an excessively low hematocrit, resulting in inadequate cerebral oxygen delivery. The model does confirm previous studies that a moderate degree of hemodilution could have marked benefits for patients cerebral outcomes (20); this would be especially true with a high-degree stenosis that is long.

Carotid artery diameter has not been considered in the past as an important factor determining cerebral perfusion pressure. The data presented above show that the carotid artery diameter in fact has a significant effect on the required perfusion pressure to protect cerebral function.

The mechanism of CVAs during cardiac surgery can be broadly divided into embolic or hypoperfusion related. Carotid artery stenosis will only potentially affect the incidence of hypoperfusion-induced cerebral injury. Hypoperfusion can result in CVAs or the more commonly encountered neurocognitive defects that have been reported to occur in >50% of patients undergoing cardiac surgery (21).

Patients with carotid artery stenosis are known to have an unpredictable outcome with regard to neurologic complications when undergoing CPB. This is usually explained by the existence of concomitant adverse factors, for example, diabetes, hypertension, and calcified aorta. This study may partly explain the variability seen clinically in these patients; however, the previously listed concomitant adverse factors still hold true. Only a prospective trial will be able to dissect the relative importance of the factors analyzed in this study compared with usually cited adverse factors.

The results from this mathematical model showed that, in addition to percentage carotid artery stenosis, carotid artery diameter, carotid artery plaque length, and blood hematocrit should be included in any thought process involving carotid artery stenosis and cardiac surgery involving CPB, with regard to either concomitant carotid endarterectomy or higher pump perfusion pressures.

Limitations of Model

As with any mathematical model, drawbacks are always present. Considerably more complicated mathematical models using Navier Stokes equations or Fanning friction coefficient modification for turbulent flow using the Darcy equation are available and more accurate. However, the aim of this study was to present an elementary basic treatise of the subject. Clinical application of the above principles will require custom-written software to isolate the practicing clinician from any mathematical calculations. The degree of collateral cerebral perfusion is not taken into account by this model. This study only shows the required perfusion pressures needed in the absence of an adequate collateral perfusion. If the amount of collateral perfusion was always adequate, there would never be a problem, because only those patients with inadequate collateral perfusion would suffer CVAs caused by hypoperfusion after cardiac surgery. The model takes no account of carotid artery plaque stability, irregularity, temperature, oxygen delivery, collateral flow, or embolic load.

Benefits of Mathematical Model

To study patients clinically with all of the permutations of percentage stenosis, carotid artery diameter, blood viscosity, and length of stenosis with just six patients per group would need a study size in excess of 3000 to be necessary, assuming that the patients were not normally distributed for these factors (which they are). Thus, to take into account a patient population that is normally distributed so that every permutation can be studied just six times would require a study population in excess of ∼30,000, which is clearly unobtainable. This shows the power of a mathematical model as a risk predictor tool for a population but not an individual.

Future Work

Three-dimensional reconstruction using magnetic resonance scanning of carotid arteries with computational fluid dynamic calculation of estimated pressure drop needs to be developed and correlated with clinical outcome.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Quigley RL, Fuller BC, Sampson LN, Reitknecht FL.. Passive retrograde cerebral perfusion during routine cardiac valve surgery reverses middle cerebral artery blood flow and reduces the risk of stroke. J Heart Valve Dis. 1997;6:288–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ricotta JJ, Faggioli GL, Castilone A, Hassett JM.. Risk factors for stroke after cardiac surgery: Buffalo Cardiac-Cerebral Study Group. J Vasc Surg. 1995;21:359–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Trehan N, Mishra M, Dhole S, Mishra A, Karlekar A, Kohli VM.. Significantly reduced incidence of stroke during coronary artery bypass grafting using transesophageal echocardiography. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1997;11:234–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cernaianu AC, Vassilidze TV, Flum DR, et al. Predictors of stroke after cardiac surgery. J Card Surg. 1995;10:334–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gottesman RF, Sherman PM, Yousem DM, et al. Watershed strokes after cardiac surgery: Diagnosis, etiology, and outcome. Stroke. 2006;37:2306–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Loop FD, Higgins TL, Panda R, Pearce G, Estafanous FG.. Myocardial protection during cardiac operations. Decreased morbidity and lower cost with blood cardioplegia and coronary sinus perfusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992;104:608–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Stamler A, Wang SY, Li J, Thurer RL, Schoen FJ, Sellke FW.. Moderate hypothermia reduces cardiopulmonary bypass-induced impairment of cerebrovascular responses to platelet products. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62:191–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Khaki A, Ravichandran PS, Kelly S, Gately HL, Starr A, Floten HS.. Extended aortic arch atherectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1897;65:255–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jahangiri M, Rees GM, Edmondson SJ, Lumley J, Uppal R.. A surgical approach to coexistent coronary and carotid artery disease. Heart. 1997;77:164–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Likosky DS, Marrin CA, Caplan LR, et al. Determination of etiologic mechanisms of strokes secondary to coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Stroke. 2003;34:2830–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Charlesworth DC, Likosky DS, Marrin CA, et al. Development and validation of a prediction model for strokes after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:436–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Van der Heyden J, Suttorp MJ, Bal ET, et al. Staged carotid angioplasty and stenting followed by cardiac surgery in patients with severe asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: Early and long-term results. Circulation. 2007;116:2002–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Byrne J, Darling RC, Roddy SP, et al. Combined carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with asymptomatic high-grade stenoses: an analysis of 758 procedures. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:67–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cartwright CR, Mangano CM.. During cardiopulmonary bypass for elective coronary artery bypass grafting, perfusion pressure should not routinely be greater than 70 mmHg. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anaes. 1998;12:361–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hartman G.. During cardiopulmonary bypass for elective coronary artery bypass grafting, perfusion pressure should rourinelt be greater than 70 mmHg. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anaes. 1998;12:358–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Schwartz LB, Bridgman AH, Kieffer RW, et al. Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis and stroke in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. J Vasc Surg. 1995;21:146–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Collins WF, Venes JL, Wagner FC, Spencer DD.. Neurological surgery. In: Brunicardi FC, Anderson DK, Billiar TR, Dunn DL, Hunter JG, Pollock RE, eds. Principles of Surgery. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1986;1786–90. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Eftekhar B, Dadmehr M, Ansari S, Ghodsi M, Nazparvar B, Ketabchi E.. Are the distributions of variations of circle of Willis different in different populations? Results of an anatomical study and review of literature. BMC Neurol. 2006;6:22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Trachiotis GD, Pfister AJ.. Management strategy for simultaneous carotid endarterectomy and coronary revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;64:1013–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Habib RH, Zacharias A, Schwann TA, Riordan CJ, Durham SJ, Shah A.. Adverse effects of low hematocrit during cardiopulmonary bypass in the adult: Should current practice be changed? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;125:1438–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Stroobant N, Van Nooten G, Belleghem Y, Vingerhoets G.. Short-term and long-term neurocognitive outcome in on-pump versus off-pump CABG. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;22:559–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Extra-corporeal Technology are provided here courtesy of EDP Sciences

RESOURCES