Abstract
Increasing evidences indicate that dys-regulation of MicroRNAs contributes to hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the roles of miR-485-5p in HCC are still largely unexplored. In the present study, our quantitative real-time PCR analysis found that miR-485-5p was significantly down-regulated in 50 pairs of human HCC tissues. Moreover, the reduced expression of miR-485-5p was significantly correlated with larger tumor size and more tumor number in patients with HCC. In vitro studies further showed that overexpression of miR-485-5p mimics could inhibit, while its antisense oligos promote cell proliferation and invasion. Results from the dual-luciferase reporter gene assays and western blot further showed that stanniocalcin 2 was a direct target of miR-485-5p. Therefore, our data suggest a novel role for miR-485-5p in the regulation of HCC progression.
Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma, MicroRNA, miR-485-5p, stanniocalcin 2
Introduction
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has become the third leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide [1,2]. In China, chronic HBV infection is a critical risk factor for the carcinogenesis and progression of HCC [3,4]. Thus, the identification of the causes and mechanisms behind the progression of HCC will improve its treatment.
MicroRNAs (miRNAs), a class of small and non-coding RNAs, could inhibit gene expression through binding to the 3’-untranslated region of target mRNAs [5,6]. It has been shown that that many deregulated miRNAs play important roles in the cell proliferation, apoptosis, invasion and metastasis in HCC [7-9]. For instance, miR-101, down-regulated in HCC tissues, promoted apoptosis and suppresses tumorigenicity [10]. Besides, miR-221 silencing was shown to block HCC and promote survival, suggesting that targeting miRNAs might benefit treatment for patients with advanced HCC [11].
Recently, miR-485-5p has been found to be dys-regulated in some types of cancers. For instance, miR-485-5p was down-regulated and correlated significantly with FIGO grade 3 in ovarian epithelial tumors [12]. Besides, Anaya-Ruiz et al. showed that miR-485 may act as a tumor suppressor by inhibiting cell growth and migration in breast carcinoma cells [13]. Moreover, miR-485-5p binding site SNP rs8752 in 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (HPGD) gene is associated with breast cancer risk [14]. However, the exact function of miR-485-5p in hepatocarcinogenesis has not been revealed yet. In this study, we found that miR-485-5p was down-regulated in HCC tissues and further explored its roles in the tumorigenesis.
Materials and methods
50 paired surgically resected HCC tissues and matched adjacent normal liver tissues were collected from patients during operation with informed consent. All tissue samples were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately after collection and stored at -80°C until use. The study was approved by the hospital institutional review board of Huaihe Hospital of Henan University.
Cell culture
Human HCC cell lines (HepG2 and Hep3B) were obtained from the Chinese Academy of Sciences Cell Bank (Shanghai, China). Cells were culture in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo., USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (EMD Millipore, Wanchai, Hong Kong, China). Cultures were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2.
RNA isolation and real-time PCR
Total RNA from tissues or cell lines was harvested using Trizol according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen, Shanghai, China). Expression of mature miRNAs was assayed using Taqman MicroRNA Assay (Applied Biosystems) specific for hsa-miR-485-5p. Small nuclear U6 snRNA was used as an internal control for normalization and quantification of miR-485-5p expression.
BrdU assays
A cell proliferation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (BrdU kit; Beyotime) was used to analyze the incorporation of BrdU during DNA synthesis following the manufacturer’s protocols. All experiments were performed in triplicate. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm in the Spectra Max 190 ELISA reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA).
miR-485-5p target predictions
The putative targets of miR-485-5p were predicted using the miRWalk software. The algorithm produced a list of hundreds of target genes for miR-485-5p by searching for the presence of conserved 7-mer and 8-mer sites matching the seed region of miR-485-5p.
Western blot
Cells were harvested and lysed with ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 485-5p mM 2-ME, 2% w/v SDS, 10% glycerol). After centrifugation at 20000*g for 10 min at 4°C, proteins in the supernatants were quantified and separated by 10% SDS PAGE, transferred to NC membrane (Amersham Bioscience, Buckinghamshire, U.K.). After blocking with 10% nonfat milk in PBS, membranes were immunoblotted with antibodies as indicated, followed by HRP-linked secondary antibodies (Cell Signaling). The signals were detected by Super Signal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Anti-Stc2 and GAPDH antibodies were purchased from Abcam (USA). Protein levels were normalized to GAPDH (Santa Cruz, USA).
Luciferase reporter assays
Total cDNA from HepG2 cells was used to amplify the 3’UTR of Stc2 by PCR. The KLF9 3’UTR was cloned into pMir-Report (Ambion), yielding pMir-Report-KLF9. Mutations were introduced in potential miR-485-5p binding sites using the Quik Change site-directed mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene). Cells were transfected with the pMir-Report vectors containing the 3’-UTR variants, and miR-485-5p mimics, negative controls for 36 hours. The pRL-TK vector (Promega, USA) carrying the Renilla luciferase gene was used as an internal control to normalize the transfection efficiency. Luciferase values were determined using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega).
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM from at least three separate experiments. Differences between groups were analyzed using Student’s t-test analysis. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Down-regulation of miR-485-5p expression in lung carcinoma tissues
The expression levels of miR-485-5p were detected in 50 cases of HCC tissues and adjacent noncancerous liver tissues using a quantitative real-time PCR method. As a result, we found that its expression was significantly reduced in HCC tissues in comparison with the adjacent normal tissues (Figure 1). Furthermore, the low miR-485-5p expression group showed a higher incidence of increased tumor size and tumor number. However, no significant differences were observed with respect to sex, age, AFP, TNM stage or metastasis in HCC (Figure 2). Therefore, these results suggest the importance of miR-485-5p down-regulation in HCC progression.
Figure 1.

Expression levels of miR-485-5p in HCC tissues. miR-485-5p expression was determined by quantitative real-time PCR in HCC tissues (Tumor) and adjacent non-cancerous normal tissues (Normal). ***P<0.001 compared with normal tissues.
Figure 2.

Relationship between miR-485-5p and clinical pathological characteristics in 50 patients with HCC.
Overexpression of miR-485-5p inhibits HCC cell proliferation
We then investigated the effects of miR-485-5p on cell proliferation and invasion in HepG2 and Hep3B cells. As shown in the Figure 3A and 3B, miR-485-5p was significantly up-regulated following transfection with miR-485-5p mimics. Abilities of cell proliferation and invasion were significantly enhanced by miR-485-5p overexpression (Figure 3C-F). On the other hand, transfection with miR-485-5p inhibitor led to a significant reduction in cell proliferation and invasion in both cells (Figure 4A-F), indicating that miR-485-5p functions as a potential tumor suppressor in HCC carcinogenesis.
Figure 3.
Overexpression of miR-485-5p mimics inhibits HCC cell proliferation. (A, B) Expression levels of miR-485-5p were determined in HepG2 (A) and Hep3B (B) cells after transfection with miR-485-5p mimics or negative control (NC). ***P < 0.001 compared with NC. (C-F) The cell proliferative potential (BrdU) and invasion abilities were determined in HepG2 and Hep3B cells transfected with miR-485-5p mimics or negative control (NC). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 compared with NC.
Figure 4.
miR-485-5p inhibitors promote the proliferation of HCC cells. (A, B) Expression levels of miR-485-5p were determined in HepG2 (A) and Hep3B (B) cells after transfection with miR-485-5p antisense or negative control (NC). ***P < 0.001 compared with NC. (C-F) The cell proliferative potential (BrdU) and invasion abilities were determined in HepG2 and Hep3B cells transfected with miR-485-5p antisense or negative control (NC). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 compared with NC.
Stc2 is a direct target of miR-485-5p
To fully understand the mechanisms by which miR-485-5p executed its function, we adopted the bioinformatic algorithms (miRWalk software) for target gene prediction [15]. Among these candidates, Stc2, an important oncogene, was identified as one of the potential targets of miR-485-5p and selected for further analysis (Figure 5A). To test that Stc2 may be a direct target of miR-485-5p, the reporter plasmid harboring the wild-type or mutant 3’-UTR region of Stc2 was constructed. As shown in Figure 5B, overexpression of miR-485-5p mimics led to a reduction of luciferase activity when the reporter construct contained the Stc2 3’-UTR (Figure 5B). However, mutation of the miR-485-5p binding site from the Stc2 3’-UTR abolished this effect of miR-485-5p (Figure 5B). Then, western blot analysis was conducted to measure the effect of miR-485-5p on endogenous Stc2 expression. Our results showed that Stc2 protein levels were substantially down-regulated by miR-485-5p (Figure 6A, 6B). In contrast, inhibition of miR-485-5p led to an increased protein level of Stc2 in HCC cells (Figure 6C, 6D). Therefore, down-regulated miR-485-5p in HCC promoted the expression of Stc2, which in turn accelerates tumorigenesis.
Figure 5.

Stc2 was the direct target of miR-485-5p in HCC cells. A. Prediction of miR-485-5p binding sites in the 3’-UTR of human Stc2 gene by miRWalk software. Potential binding site was highlighted in bold. B. Luciferase reporter assays in HepG2 cells. Cells were transfected with wild-type or mutant 3’-UTR-reporter constructs together with miR-485-5p mimics or negative controls (NC).
Figure 6.

miR-485-5p inhibits Stc2 expression in HCC cells. (A-D) Representative protein levels of Stc2 in HepG2 and Hep3B cells transfected with miR-485-5p mimics (A, B), miR-485-5p antisense (C, D) or negative controls (NC).
Discussion
The roles of miRNAs in the development of HCC have attracted recent attention by a variety of studies [9,16]. The current work showed that miR-485-5p expression is significantly reduced in human HCC, compared with matching adjacent nontumoral tissue. Besides, ectopic overexpression of miR-367 mimics inhibited, whereas its antisense promoted cell proliferation and invasion in HCC cells. In addition, luciferase reporter assays and western blot analysis found that miR-485-5p could interact with 3’-UTR of Stc2 gene, to inhibit its protein expression.
Stanniocalcin (STC) belongs to a family of secreted glycoprotein hormones that was first studied in the corpuscles of Stannius, an endocrine gland of fish [17,18]. Initially, Stc2 was identified as a negative regulator of postnatal growth, as evidenced by mice with Stc2 deletion [19]. Subsequent studies showed that Stc2 is up-regulated in many types of human cancers, including gastric, breast, prostate and ovarian cancer [20-23]. Besides, Stc2 is shown to be up-regulated by hypoxia-mediated HIF1 activation and promote cell proliferation [24]. Importantly, Stc2 is also up-regulated in hepatocellular carcinoma, which predicts poor prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma, and promotes cell proliferation and migration in vitro [25,26]. However, the molecular determinants for the aberrant expression of Stc2 remains poorly understood. Therefore, our results provide an alternative mechanism for Stc2 in HCC.
Interestingly, a recent study found that Stc2 could be suppressed by miR-206 in gastric cancer [27]. Taken together, these results indicate that certain miRNAs might be applied as potential prognostic biomarker and new therapeutic target for cancer therapy.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Key project of science and technology of Henan Province (14A320073).
Disclosure of conflict of interest
None.
References
- 1.Gomaa AI, Waked I. Recent advances in multidisciplinary management of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Hepatol. 2015;7:673–687. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i4.673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cristea CG, Gheonea IA, Sandulescu LD, Gheonea DI, Ciurea T, Purcarea MR. Considerations regarding current diagnosis and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Med Life. 2015;8:120–128. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhang XD, Wang Y, Ye LH. Hepatitis B virus X protein accelerates the development of hepatoma. Cancer Biol Med. 2014;11:182–190. doi: 10.7497/j.issn.2095-3941.2014.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Liu WC, Liu QY. Molecular mechanisms of gender disparity in hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:6252–6261. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i20.6252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.van Kouwenhove M, Kedde M, Agami R. MicroRNA regulation by RNA-binding proteins and its implications for cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:644–656. doi: 10.1038/nrc3107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ryan BM, Robles AI, Harris CC. Genetic variation in microRNA networks: the implications for cancer research. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10:389–402. doi: 10.1038/nrc2867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chu R, Mo G, Duan Z, Huang M, Chang J, Li X, Liu P. miRNAs affect the development of hepatocellular carcinoma via dysregulation of their biogenesis and expression. Cell Commun Signal. 2014;12:45. doi: 10.1186/s12964-014-0045-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Li G, Cai G, Li D, Yin W. MicroRNAs and liver disease: viral hepatitis, liver fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Postgrad Med J. 2014;90:106–112. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2013-131883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yin W, Zhao Y, Ji YJ, Tong LP, Liu Y, He SX, Wang AQ. Serum/plasma microRNAs as biomarkers for HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma in China. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:965185. doi: 10.1155/2015/965185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shen Q, Bae HJ, Eun JW, Kim HS, Park SJ, Shin WC, Lee EK, Park S, Park WS, Lee JY, Nam SW. MiR-101 functions as a tumor suppressor by directly targeting nemo-like kinase in liver cancer. Cancer Lett. 2014;344:204–211. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2013.10.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Moshiri F, Callegari E, D’Abundo L, Corra F, Lupini L, Sabbioni S, Negrini M. Inhibiting the oncogenic mir-221 by microRNA sponge: toward microRNA-based therapeutics for hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2014;7:43–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kim TH, Kim YK, Kwon Y, Heo JH, Kang H, Kim G, An HJ. Deregulation of miR-519a, 153, and 485-5p and its clinicopathological relevance in ovarian epithelial tumours. Histopathology. 2010;57:734–743. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2010.03686.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Anaya-Ruiz M, Bandala C, Perez-Santos JL. miR-485 acts as a tumor suppressor by inhibiting cell growth and migration in breast carcinoma T47D cells. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14:3757–3760. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.6.3757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.He N, Zheng H, Li P, Zhao Y, Zhang W, Song F, Chen K. miR-485-5p binding site SNP rs8752 in HPGD gene is associated with breast cancer risk. PLoS One. 2014;9:e102093. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dweep H, Gretz N, Sticht C. miRWalk database for miRNA-target interactions. Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1182:289–305. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1062-5_25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhu Z, Zhang X, Wang G, Zheng H. Role of MicroRNAs in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Hepat Mon. 2014;14:e18672. doi: 10.5812/hepatmon.18672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ishibashi K, Imai M. Prospect of a stanniocalcin endocrine/paracrine system in mammals. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2002;282:F367–375. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00364.2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yeung BH, Law AY, Wong CK. Evolution and roles of stanniocalcin. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2012;349:272–280. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2011.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chang AC, Hook J, Lemckert FA, McDonald MM, Nguyen MA, Hardeman EC, Little DG, Gunning PW, Reddel RR. The murine stanniocalcin 2 gene is a negative regulator of postnatal growth. Endocrinology. 2008;149:2403–2410. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-1219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Arigami T, Uenosono Y, Ishigami S, Yanagita S, Hagihara T, Haraguchi N, Matsushita D, Hirahara T, Okumura H, Uchikado Y, Nakajo A, Hokita S, Natsugoe S. Clinical significance of stanniocalcin 2 expression as a predictor of tumor progression in gastric cancer. Oncol Rep. 2013;30:2838–2844. doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zawadzka AM, Schilling B, Cusack MP, Sahu AK, Drake P, Fisher SJ, Benz CC, Gibson BW. Phosphoprotein secretome of tumor cells as a source of candidates for breast cancer biomarkers in plasma. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014;13:1034–1049. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M113.035485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tamura K, Furihata M, Chung SY, Uemura M, Yoshioka H, Iiyama T, Ashida S, Nasu Y, Fujioka T, Shuin T, Nakamura Y, Nakagawa H. Stanniocalcin 2 overexpression in castration-resistant prostate cancer and aggressive prostate cancer. Cancer Sci. 2009;100:914–919. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01117.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Law AY, Wong CK. Stanniocalcin-2 promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition and invasiveness in hypoxic human ovarian cancer cells. Exp Cell Res. 2010;316:3425–3434. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.06.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Law AY, Wong CK. Stanniocalcin-2 is a HIF-1 target gene that promotes cell proliferation in hypoxia. Exp Cell Res. 2010;316:466–476. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhang ZH, Wu YG, Qin CK, Rong ZH, Su ZX, Xian GZ. Stanniocalcin 2 expression predicts poor prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol Lett. 2014;8:2160–2164. doi: 10.3892/ol.2014.2520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 26.Wang H, Wu K, Sun Y, Li Y, Wu M, Qiao Q, Wei Y, Han ZG, Cai B. STC2 is upregulated in hepatocellular carcinoma and promotes cell proliferation and migration in vitro. BMB Rep. 2012;45:629–634. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2012.45.11.086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ren J, Huang HJ, Gong Y, Yue S, Tang LM, Cheng SY. MicroRNA-206 suppresses gastric cancer cell growth and metastasis. Cell Biosci. 2014;4:26. doi: 10.1186/2045-3701-4-26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


