Abstract
Occupying about 2%~3% of all malignant tumors, renal carcinoma is the most common primary cancer in kidney. The oxidative level of tumor cells is of vital role for optimizing treatment plan, evaluating efficacy and predicting prognosis. This study thus investigated the R2* value in mouse renal carcinoma model and the correlation between tumor hypoxia and expression level of hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1). A total of 20 BALB/C nude mice (4~6 weeks old) were inoculated with human ACHN renal carcinoma cells to generate renal cancer model. After the tumor diameter reached 0.5 cm, all animals were examined by BOLD-MRI, both under normal inhalation (R2a*) and carbogen treatment (R2b*). The alternation of R2* values (ΔR2*=R2a* - R2b*) was calculated. Mice were then sacrificed for Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining targeting HIF-1α and HIF-2α. The positive score of HIF was then analyzed for its correlation with R2* value. In 18 mice finished both experiments, Pearson correlation analysis revealed significant negative correlation between R2a* and ΔR2* (r=-0.48, P<0.05) and positive relationship between ΔR2* and HIF-2α (r=0.38, P<0.05). HIF-1α level, however, did not correlated with tumor R* values. The positive correlation between ΔR2* and HIF-2α, but not HIF-1α, suggested potential role of combined BOLD-MRI technique and HIF-1α staining in clinical diagnosis of renal carcinoma. HIF-2α may work as biological marker for renal cancer.
Keywords: Renal carcinoma, BOLD-MIR, hypoxia inducible factor, correlation analysis
Introduction
Renal cancer consists almost 85%~90% of all primary malignant renal tumors and occupies about 2%~3% of all cancers [1]. In each year, there are about 209,000 newly discovered cases of renal carcinoma worldwide [2]. In different regions of China, the overall incidence and mortality of renal cancer is growing, although the existence of regional difference [3].
Hypoxia inducible factor (HIF) exerts important roles in the pathogenesis of multiple tumors. It is firstly identified from nuclear extracts of hypoxia-induced cells [4], and is one of major transcriptional factors regulating gene expression under hypoxia condition. It is widely distributed in human cells and is composed of α- and β-subunits. Hypoxia and HIF-1 are known to be related with various tumor progressive factors. For example, the blocking of hypoxia pathway can lead to metabolic disorder, depressed angiogenesis, and even programmed death of tumor cells. There have been various experiments to inhibit HIF-1 at transcriptional, translational and intracellular activity levels, to facilitate the hypoxia treatment of cancer. The accurate monitor of oxidative level of tumor cells, is thus of critical importance for optimizing treatment strategy, evaluating efficacy and predicting prognosis. Cytoplasmic HIF-1α level has been known to be up-regulated in renal carcinoma with higher malignancy [5]. Both HIF-1α and HIF-2α are shown be abundantly expressed in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CRCC), along with the correlation between HIF-α positive rate and pathological grade of CRCC [6,7]. Therefore, HIF-α plays a crucial role in both occurrence and progression of CRCC.
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of renal functions is a novel non-invasive technique to evaluate renal functions. It can provide information regarding both kidney morphology and kidney functions on routine MRI equipment without using contrasts. It has been widely applied in various kidney diseases including chronic renal failure, kidney transplantation, hypertensive kidney dysfunction, ischemic renal injury and renal tumors [8,9]. One novel fMRI technology, blood oxygenation level-dependent MRI (BOLD-MRI) can reflect the oxygen pressure inside tissues, via the magnetic signals variations as the result of hemoglobin/oxygenated hemoglobin. This technique is sensitive in evaluating the acute hypoxia condition inside tissues [10]. This study thus investigated the correlation between R2* values obtained from BOLD-MRI on hypoxic tumor tissues and HIF, which can work as one endogenous marker for tumor hypoxia, in an attempt to provide evidences for optimizing clinical treatment of kidney cancer.
Materials and methods
Animal model
A total of 20 BALB/C nude mice (both males and females, aging between 4~6 weeks, body weight: 15~20 g) were kept in a specific pathogen free (SPF) grade animal facility with food and water ad libitum. Mice were used for all experiments, and all procedures were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Liyang people’s Hospital.
Human ACHN renal carcinoma cells (Aiyan Bio., Shanghai, China) were cultured in DMEM with changing every 48 hours. Cells were digested by 0.25% trypsin and rinsed in D-Hank solution. After centrifugation and discarding supernatants, cells were re-suspended in serum-free medium at 1.0 × 107 per mL.
Mice were anesthetized by 1% pentobarbital (0.15 mL) via intraperitoneal injection. After skin sterilization, 0.2 mL ACHN cell suspensions were injected subcutaneously into the forelimb axillary skin.
BOLD-MRI
All mice were examined under BOLD-MRI (Achieva 3.0T, GE, US) using phased array coils for small animals (5 cm diameter). Examinations were performed before and after carbogen inhalation. Computer software was used to analyze all captured images. R2* values were averaged across all planes fitted imaging criteria. R2* values during air inhalation were marked as R2a*, while those values captured 10 min after carbogen inhalation were designed as R2b*. ΔR2* was calculated as R2b* - R2a*.
Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining
Mice after BOLD-MRI were then sacrificed. Renal samples were firstly fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin (NBF), followed by paraffin embedding and sectioning (4 μm thickness). After de-wax and re-hydration, tissues slides were quenched for hydroxylase activity, blocked by non-immune serum, and was incubated with mouse anti-human HIF-1α and HIF-2α monoclonal antibody (Yixin Biotech., Shanghai, China). Secondary antibody and streptomycin-conjugated anti-biotin and peroxidase were sequentially applied to develop the slides using DAB substrates. After counter-staining in hematoxylin, images were captured under high magnification (×400) light-field microscope (Olympus, Japan). In each tissue section, 3 fields were randomly selected for counting 200 cells in each field. The positive cell number was counted and overall positive scores were given as 0 (less than 1% of positive cells), 1 (1%~10% positive cells), 2 (11%~50% positive cells), 3 (51%~80% positive cells) and 4 (more than 80% positive cells). Moreover, staining strength score was also given as 0 (no staining), 1 (light yellow), 2 (dark yellow) or 3 (dark brown). The final score of staining was given by the summation of positive score and strength score.
Statistical analysis
SPSS 18.0 software was used to process all collected data, of which measurement data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). All data were firstly tested for normal distribution using one-sample K-S test. Pearson analysis was used to examine the correlation between parameters. A statistical significance was defined when P<0.05.
Results
R2a* and ΔR2* values in renal carcinoma tissues
Among all 20 mice, 2 of them died from anesthesia, and the remaining 18 mice completed all MRI examination and IHC staining (N=18). We found 16 mice had depressed R2* values after carbogen inhalation, while 2 of them had increase levels (Table 1), suggesting individual differentiation in the response to carbogen.
Table 1.
R2a* (S-1) | ΔR2* (S-1) | |
---|---|---|
Mean ± SD | 38.13±14.32 | -2.35±2.07 |
Z | 0.91 | 0.71 |
P | 0.32 | 0.62 |
HIF-1α and HIF-2α expression
Both HIF-1α and HIF-2α were specifically expressed in the nucleus. These two factors were shown to diffuse within tumor tissues or in the adjacent sites (Table 2).
Table 2.
HIF-1α | HIF-2α | |
---|---|---|
Mean ± SD | 3.8±1.25 | 2.91±1.49 |
Z | 0.74 | 0.55 |
P | 0.64 | 0.85 |
Correlation between HIF-1α/2α expression and R2a* and ΔR2* values
Using one-sample K-S test, the distribution of HIF-1α, HIF-2α, R2a* and ΔR2* values all fitted the normal distribution. Pearson correlation analysis showed significantly negative correlation between R2a* and ΔR2* values (r=-0.48, P<0.05), while both R2a* or ΔR2* values were positively correlated with HIF-2α (r=0.47 and 0.38, P<0.05, Table 3).
Table 3.
ΔR2* | HIF-1α | HIF-2α | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||
r | P | r | P | r | P | |
R2a* | -0.48 | 0.0032 | 0.04 | 0.79 | 0.47 | 0.0029 |
ΔR2* | 0.27 | 0.17 | 0.38 | 0.0044 |
Discussion
HIF is one of major transcriptional factors regulating gene expression under hypoxia condition and is widely distributed in human cells. Composing of α- and β-subunits, HIF family members share certain structural similarities. The α-subunit, including HIF-1α, HIF-2α and HIF-3α, exert unique inducing mechanisms due to differential expression. After dimerization between HIF-α and HIF-β, dozens of hypoxia responsive genes (HRGs) can be activated. HIF-1 and HIF-2 are known to participate in the pathological process for tissue hypoxemia. Due to the uncontrolled growth, tumor tissues may suffer from hypoxia, causing increased stability of intracellular HIF-α, which can form dimers with β-subunits. Such actions may lead to abnormal down-stream gene expression, such as the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and angiogenesis. HIF-1α is widely distributed in various tumors, with its expression level increased by the tissue hypoxia condition. The accumulation of HIF-1α thus may works as one endogenously index for in vivo assay of hypoxia [11].
Studies have revealed the absence of HIF-1α in normal kidney tissues but significantly elevation in CRCC [12] rather than other types of renal cancer. The reason for up-regulation of HIF-1α in renal carcinoma tissues may be due to the hypoxia condition under renal cancer. A clinical survey showed 37.5% of non-CRCC patients had HIF-1α up-regulation. This figure in CRCC, however, was 75% [13]. No matter under hypoxia or normal condition, HIF-2α exerts a more powerful role in transcriptional activation of VEGF mRNA compared to HIF-1α, suggesting more important role of HIF-2α signaling pathway in the occurrence and progression of renal carcinoma [14,15]. Previous study has revealed the potentiation of HIF-2α expression in CRCC, along with a positive correlation between HIF-2α level and tumor invasiveness [12]. The up-regulation of HIF-2α mainly existed in CRCC as proved by previous study [16]. In summary, both HIF-1α and HIF-2α play an important role in both occurrence and progression of renal carcinoma, and may work as predicative indexes for tumor metastasis and invasion. In this study we also found positive expression of HIF-1α and HIF-2α in renal carcinoma tissues, as agreed with previous findings.
BOLD-MRI uses the influence of hemoglobin/oxygenated hemoglobin on magnetic signal strength, thus indirectly predicting the distribution of oxygen inside tissues. This is a high-sensitive assay for examining acute tissue hypoxia [10]. The R2* value of BOLD-MRI was known to be positively correlated with tissue contents of hemoglobin. Previous findings reported the elevated oxygen pressure after carbogen inhalation using both BOLD-MRI and microelectrode assays on mouse squamous carcinoma cells [17]. Further study supported the correlation between R2* value of BOLD-MRI and tissue hypoxia score (HP5) and oxygen pressure, in addition to the tumor distribution of HIF-1 [18]. A recent in vivo study suggested decreased HIF-1α expression and lowered lactate byproducts in tumor cells after exogenously application of HIF inhibitor [19]. Both HIF-α and R2* value are correlated with tissue oxygen contents. Studies cannot identify significant correlation between HIF-α expression level and R2* value in either high malignancy or low malignancy group. However, HIF-2α expression rate was shown to be positively correlated with R2* value in CRCC with different TNM stages [20,21]. Our study revealed negative relationship between R2a* and ΔR2* values, while both R2a* or ΔR2* values were positively correlated with HIF-2α. In summary, our results suggested the potential role of BOLD-MRI in clinical treatment of renal carcinoma, when combing with HIF-2α expressional assay. This study provided further evidences regarding the potency of HIF-α in an independent or combined molecular marker for renal cancer.
Disclosure of conflict of interest
None.
References
- 1.Lam JS, Klatte T, Breda A. Staging of renal cell carcinoma: Current concepts. Indian J Urol. 2009;25:446–54. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.57906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gupta K, Miller JD, Li JZ, Russell MW, Charbonneau C. Epidemiologic and socioeconomic burden of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): a literature review. Cancer Treat Rev. 2008;34:193–205. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2007.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chow WH, Devesa SS. Contemporary epidemiology of renal cell cancer. Cancer J. 2008;14:288–301. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3181867628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Semenza GL, Wang GL. A nuclear factor induced by hypoxia via de novo protein synthesis binds to the human erythropoietin gene enhancer at a site required for transcriptional activation. Mol Cell Biol. 1992;12:5447–54. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.12.5447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dorevic G, Matusan-Ilijas K, Babarović E, Hadzisejdić I, Grahovac M, Grahovac B, Jonjić N. Hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha correlates with vascular endothelial growth factor A and C indicating worse prognosis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2009;28:40. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-28-40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sudarshan S, Linehan WM, Neckers L. HIF and fumarate hydratase in renal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2007;96:403–7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Toschi A, Edelstein J, Rockwell P, Ohh M, Foster DA. HIF alpha expression in VHL-deficient renal cancer cells is dependent on phospholipase D. Oncogene. 2008;27:2746–53. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pruijm M, Hofmann L, Piskunowicz M, Muller ME, Zweiacker C, Bassi I, Vogt B, Stuber M, Burnier M. Determinants of renal tissue oxygenation as measured with BOLD-MRI in chronic kidney disease and hypertension in humans. PLoS One. 2014;9:e95895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wu GY, Suo ST, Lu Q, Zhang J, Zhu WQ, Xu JR. The value of blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) MR imaging in differentiation of renal solid mass and grading of renal cell carcinoma (RCC): analysis based on the largest cross-sectional area versus the entire whole tumour. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0123431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tatum JL, Kelloff GJ, Gillies RJ, Arbeit JM, Brown JM, Chao KS, Chapman JD, Eckelman WC, Fyles AW, Giaccia AJ, Hill RP, Koch CJ, Krishna MC, Krohn KA, Lewis JS, Mason RP, Melillo G, Padhani AR, Powis G, Rajendran JG, Reba R, Robinson SP, Semenza GL, Swartz HM, Vaupel P, Yang D, Croft B, Hoffman J, Liu G, Stone H, Sullivan D. Hypoxia: importance in tumor biology, noninvasive measurement by imaging, and value of its measurement in the management of cancer therapy. Int J Radiat Biol. 2006;82:699–757. doi: 10.1080/09553000601002324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Maynard MA, and Ohh M. Von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein and hypoxia-inducible factor in kidney cancer. Am J Nephrol. 2004;24:1–13. doi: 10.1159/000075346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mandriota SJ, Turner KJ, Davies DR, Murray PG, Morgan NV, Sowter HM, Wykoff CC, Maher ER, Harris AL, Ratcliffe PJ, Maxwell PH. HIF activation identifies early lesions in VHL kidneys: evidence for site-specific tumor suppressor function in the nephron. Cancer Cell. 2002;1:459–68. doi: 10.1016/s1535-6108(02)00071-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wiesener MS, Münchenhagen PM, Berger I, Morgan NV, Roigas J, Schwiertz A, Jürgensen JS, Gruber G, Maxwell PH, Löning SA, Frei U, Maher ER, Gröne HJ, Eckardt KU. Constitutive activation of hypoxia-inducible genes related to overexpression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha in clear cell renal carcinomas. Cancer Res. 2001;61:5215–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Krieg M, Haas R, Brauch H, Acker T, Flamme I, Plate KH. Up-regulation of hypoxia-inducible factors HIF-1alpha and HIF-2alpha under normoxic conditions in renal carcinoma cells by von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor gene loss of function. Oncogene. 2000;19:5435–43. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Turner KJ, Moore JW, Jones A, Taylor CF, Cuthbert-Heavens D, Han C, Leek RD, Gatter KC, Maxwell PH, Ratcliffe PJ, Cranston D, Harris AL. Expression of hypoxia-inducible factors in human renal cancer: relationship to angiogenesis and to the von Hippel-Lindau gene mutation. Cancer Res. 2002;62:2957–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sowter HM, Raval RR, Moore JW, Ratcliffe PJ, Harris AL. Predominant role of hypoxia-inducible transcription factor (Hif)-1alpha versus Hif-2alpha in regulation of the transcriptional response to hypoxia. Cancer Res. 2003;63:6130–6134. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Reijnders K, English SJ, Krishna MC, Cook JA, Sowers AL, Mitchell JB, Zhang Y. Influence of body temperature on the BOLD effect in murine SCC tumors. Magn Reson Med. 2004;51:389–93. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chopra S, Foltz WD, Milosevic MF, Toi A, Bristow RG, Ménard C, Haider MA. Comparing oxygen-sensitive MRI (BOLD R2*) with oxygen electrode measurements: a pilot study in men with prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Biol. 2009;85:805–13. doi: 10.1080/09553000903043059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Baker LC, Boult JK, Walker-Samuel S, Chung YL, Jamin Y, Ashcroft M, Robinson SP. The HIF-pathway inhibitor NSC-134754 induces metabolic changes and anti-tumour activity while maintaining vascular function. Br J Cancer. 2012;106:1638–47. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fan B, Wang XY, Yang XD, Zhong H, Wu CX, Jiang XX. Blood oxygen level-dependent MRI for the monitoring of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast carcinoma: initial experience. Magn Reson Imaging. 2011;29:153–9. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2010.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ring J, Persigehl T, Remmele S, Heindel W, Dahnke H, Bremer C. Monitoring of bevacizumab-induced antiangiogenic treatment effects by “steady state” ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles magnetic resonance imaging using robust multiecho DeltaR2* relaxometry. Invest Radiol. 2011;46:326–30. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182045457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]