Skip to main content
The Journal of ExtraCorporeal Technology logoLink to The Journal of ExtraCorporeal Technology
. 2006 Jun;38(2):122.

It’s Not the Pump, It’s How You Use the Pump!

David A Stump 1
PMCID: PMC4680746  PMID: 16921683

The authors used a clever and inexpensive method to confirm the conclusions previously described by Wake Forest University investigators, who used vastly more expensive techniques in animals and human models: namely, the source of lipid microemboli during cardiac surgery are largely derived from the return of cardiotomy suction blood and, to a lesser extent, cell saver treated blood (1,2).

The authors’ recommendation to limit lipid microembolization is to avoid cardiopulmonary bypass and to use off-pump surgical techniques, at least for routine CABG. The CardioNeuroProtection research team at Wake Forest came to a somewhat different conclusion (3,4). We demonstrated that we could avoid lipid embolization by minimizing bleeding and thereby the need to return any blood products regardless of whether the pump was used or not.

Our current research demonstrates that it is not necessary for a lipid or gaseous embolus to occlude a vessel to cause damage (5). The mere passage, or rather extrusion, of a deformable embolus through a vessel can cause a disruption of endothelial function, which in the case of the brain, results in a breakdown of the Blood Brain Barrier with subsequent vasogenic and cytotoxic edema, the release of cytokines, neutrophil adhesions, and the transmigration of leukocytes in to the brain substance (6). Avoiding the return of shed blood in its many forms potentially contributes to a reduction in the systemic inflammatory response. Our recent paper (7) demonstrates equivalent neurologic outcomes between patient groups undergoing CABG with and without the pump by avoiding the use of partial occlusion clamps and minimizing the return of suctioned blood. Further analysis has demonstrated fewer persistent neurologic deficits in the on-pump group than those undergoing off-pump surgery. We speculated that the neuroprotective effect of hypothermia contributed to the improved outcomes in the CPB patients.

However, we caution that not all pumps, filters, and cell savers are equally effective at handling gaseous and or lipid microemboli (2,8). The contribution of emboli from the surgical field is a confounding factor when attempting to ascribe “blame” for negative outcomes. The pump is an easy target despite the fact that gaseous and lipid micro-emboli from the surgical field can pass completely through both the patient and circuit. Emboli are not absent during off-pump surgery and they are delivered to a warm brain. It is critical to avoid introducing embolic material and not rely on a filtration system to rectify a preventable problem (9).

The clever experimental design used by these investigators will contribute to an accelerated resolution as to how best to avoid lipid microembolization and improve outcomes, with or without the pump.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Brooker RF., Brown WR, Moody DM., Hammon JW Jr., Reboussin DM., Deal DD., Ghazi-Birry HS., Stump DA.. Cardiotomy suction, a major source of brain lipid emboli during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;65:1651–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kincaid EH, Jones TJ, Stump DA, Brown WR, Moody DM, Deal DD, Hammon JW Jr.. Processing scavenged blood with a cell saver reduces cerebral lipid microembolization. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70:1296–1300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Stump DA.. Embolic factors associated with cardiac surgery. Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2005;9:151–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Stump DA, Rorie KD, Jones TJJ.. Does off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery reduce the risk of brain injury? Heart Surg Forum. 2001;4:S14–S18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Stump DA, Moody DM, Brown WR, Deal DD, Vernon JC.. Does the reinfusion of salvaged blood and micro-particulate emboli during CPB cause brain injury? Anesthesiology. 2003;97:A836. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Muth CM, Shank ES.. Gas embolism. N Engl J Med 2000;342:476–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hammon JW, Stump DA, Butterworth JF, Rorie K, Deal DD, Kincaid EA, Kon ND.. Single cross clamp improves six month cognitive outcome in high risk coronary bypass patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131:114–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jones TJ, Deal DD, Vernon JC, Blackburn N, Stump DA.. How effective are cardiopulmonary bypass circuits at removing gaseous microemboli? J Extra Corpor Technol. 2002;34:34–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hammon JW, Stump DA, Butterworth JF, Moody DM.. Approaches to reduce neurologic complications during cardiac surgery. Sem Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;13:184–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Extra-corporeal Technology are provided here courtesy of EDP Sciences

RESOURCES