Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of General Virology logoLink to The Journal of General Virology
. 2015 Aug;96(Pt 8):2442–2452. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.000158

Discovery of novel virus sequences in an isolated and threatened bat species, the New Zealand lesser short-tailed bat (Mystacina tuberculata)

Jing Wang 1, Nicole E Moore 1, Zak L Murray 1, Kate McInnes 2, Daniel J White 3, Daniel M Tompkins 3, Richard J Hall 1,✉
PMCID: PMC4681071  PMID: 25900137

Abstract

Bats harbour a diverse array of viruses, including significant human pathogens. Extensive metagenomic studies of material from bats, in particular guano, have revealed a large number of novel or divergent viral taxa that were previously unknown. New Zealand has only two extant indigenous terrestrial mammals, which are both bats, Mystacina tuberculata (the lesser short-tailed bat) and Chalinolobus tuberculatus (the long-tailed bat). Until the human introduction of exotic mammals, these species had been isolated from all other terrestrial mammals for over 1 million years (potentially over 16 million years for M. tuberculata). Four bat guano samples were collected from M. tuberculata roosts on the isolated offshore island of Whenua hou (Codfish Island) in New Zealand. Metagenomic analysis revealed that this species still hosts a plethora of divergent viruses. Whilst the majority of viruses detected were likely to be of dietary origin, some putative vertebrate virus sequences were identified. Papillomavirus, polyomavirus, calicivirus and hepevirus were found in the metagenomic data and subsequently confirmed using independent PCR assays and sequencing. The new hepevirus and calicivirus sequences may represent new genera within these viral families. Our findings may provide an insight into the origins of viral families, given their detection in an isolated host species.

Introduction

Bats (order Chiroptera) are the second most diverse group of mammals with over 1200 species, accounting for more than 20 % of mammals (Simmons, 2005). They occur throughout most of the world except for the two polar regions. In the last decade, it has become increasingly apparent that bats are important natural reservoirs for emerging and re-emerging zoonotic viruses, due at least in part to roosting habitats, the formation of large colonies, adaptive immune systems, a long life span, and long-distance flying capability (Calisher et al., 2006; Luis et al., 2013). Bat-associated viruses are known to cause severe disease in humans, and rabies has been recognized for centuries in this regard. Many zoonotic viruses that have emerged recently are thought to have their origins in bats. For example, Chinese horseshoe bats (genus Rhinolophus) are thought to be the source of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus, which emerged in South China via an intermediate host (caged civets) and then caused significant mortality in humans (Ge et al., 2013; Lau et al., 2005; Li et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2006). Evidence similarly points to the Egyptian tomb bat (Taphozous perforatus) as a potential source of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (Chan et al., 2013b; Memish et al., 2013; Milne-Price et al., 2014). Other examples of pathogenic human viruses that may have emerged from bats (O'Shea et al., 2014) include Ebola virus (Leroy et al., 2005), Nipah virus (Chua et al., 2000), Hendra virus (Murray et al., 1995; Selvey et al., 1995) and Australian bat lyssavirus (Warrilow, 2005). Bats are often asymptomatic during infection, but the disease can be severe for a new host species when cross-species transmission occurs (Chan et al., 2013a; Smith & Wang, 2013). Surveys of the bat virome and monitoring of virus dynamics in bat populations can inform our fundamental understanding on how viral pathogens emerge and evolve, enabling strategies for the prevention of future outbreaks or pandemics.

The global diversity of viruses found in bats is still largely unknown, and it is thought that a great number of virus taxa are yet to be discovered (Anthony et al., 2013). Viruses in native New Zealand bats are poorly studied, perhaps in part due to the absence of any significant association with disease, either in the bats themselves or in other species. Three bat species represent the entire indigenous terrestrial mammalian fauna of New Zealand, the long-tailed bat (Chalinolobus tuberculatus), the lesser short-tailed bat (Mystacina tuberculata), and the extinct greater short-tailed bat (Mystacina robusta) (King, 2005). M. tuberculata is thought to have lived in isolation for over 16 million years until the arrival of C. tuberculatus over 1 million years before the present (BP) (O'Donnell, 2001). Other terrestrial mammals have been introduced within the last 800 years by Polynesian explorers and Europeans (King, 2005). Given the relative isolation of these bats, it may be possible to make inferences on the origins of virus groups discovered within this species. For example, we have previously reported the discovery of an alphacoronavirus in M. tuberculata guano from a remote offshore island of New Zealand (Hall et al., 2014a). Alphacoronaviruses exclusively infect mammals, so this virus either has been circulating in native bats for more than 1 million years or has arrived via other mammals that were introduced later by humans. The former hypothesis would be congruent with a recent study contending that coronaviruses have an ancient origin (Wertheim et al., 2013), whereas previous molecular clocks estimate an origin for all coronaviruses of only 10 000 years BP (Woo et al., 2012).

This study provides an analysis of metagenomic data in M. tuberculata from two bat guano samples collected from Codfish Island (Whenua hou) in New Zealand, revealing the presence of a large number of insect, plant and vertebrate viruses. Our aim was to determine whether this bat species was a host to potential bat pathogens, or zoonotic pathogens, that are relevant to human and wildlife health.

Results

For the two guano samples analysed by metagenomics, 25 314 920 and 23 100 574 sequence reads were generated in total for the DNA and RNA metagenomes, respectively. In the DNA metagenome, 19.55, 0.28 and 6.92 % of reads were assigned to bacteria, eukaryotes and viruses, respectively (Fig. 1a), with 79.65 % of virus reads assigned to bacteriophages (Fig. 1b). In the RNA metagenome, 44.99, 5.44 and 0.38 % of reads were assigned to bacteria, eukaryotes and viruses, respectively (Fig. 1c), with 82.63 % of virus reads assigned to the family Flaviviridae (Fig. 1d), a virus group known to infect insects and thus consistent with the insectivorous diet of M. tuberculata. Less than 2 % of all virus sequence reads showed similarity to vertebrate viruses, with significant RAPSearch2 matches to conserved gene regions used for taxonomic assignment (i.e. capsid and/or helicase genes) of papillomavirus, picornavirus, polyomavirus, calicivirus and hepevirus.

Fig. 1. Metagenomic data summary from RAPSearch2 results. Overall summary of the taxonomic assignment for individual sequence reads from the metagenomic data of two New Zealand short-tailed bat guano samples for the combined DNA metagenome (a), DNA viruses (b), combined RNA metagenome (c) and RNA viruses (d).

Fig. 1.

Open in a new tab

Papillomaviridae

Papillomaviruses are non-enveloped, small dsDNA viruses that are capable of infecting all amniotes. In total, 105 sequence reads were identified as having similarity to papillomaviruses within the DNA metagenome, which assembled into 39 contigs matching E1, E2, E6, L1 and L2 genes (Fig. 2a, b). The sequences of the two L1 contigs, 518 and 523 bp, were confirmed by PCR and Sanger sequencing (GenBank accession nos. KM204378 and KM204379), and each was found in a different single guano sample. These sequences were then used for phylogenetic analysis. Based on these data, the two novel papillomavirus sequences (here named PV1 and PV2) grouped with deltapapillomaviruses (Fig. 2c). The L1 gene of PV1 (KM204378) shared 54.2 % amino acid sequence identity to its closest relative, bovine papillomavirus (GenBank accession no. NC001522). The L1 gene of PV2 (KM204379) showed 54.3 % similarity to its closest relative, deer papillomavirus (GenBank accession no. NC001523). The two New Zealand bat papillomaviruses had 86.1 % amino acid sequence identity for the partial L1 gene sequence.

Fig. 2. Identification of putative papillomavirus sequences. (a) Schematic representation of the location of contigs matching the papillomavirus genome, shown as the outer dark black line. Genome positions (bp) are shown inside. (b) Proportions of gene segments in the metagenomic data matching papillomavirus sequences. (c) Phylogenetic tree showing the relationship of the New Zealand bat papillomavirus L1 directly from the metagenomic data with that of other papillomaviruses. The New Zealand bat papillomavirus sequences were 172 aa (GenBank accession no. KM204379) and 173 aa (GenBank accession no. KM204378) respectively. The tree was compiled using the maximum-likelihood method and Lee and Gascuel model with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Bootstrap values < 50 % are not shown. Bar, number of amino acid substitutions per site. Asterisks (*) denote unclassified caliciviruses which have been suggested as new genera.

Fig. 2.

Open in a new tab

Polyomaviridae

Polyomaviruses (PyVs) are small, circular dsDNA viruses. Their natural hosts are mammals and birds. In total, 493 sequence reads were identified in the DNA metagenome as having similarity to PyVs, which assembled into 29 contigs covering VP1, VP2, VP3, and the small T antigen and large T antigen genes (Fig. 3a, b). The presence of one of the VP1 contigs, 609 bp (GenBank accession no. KM204380), was confirmed in two out of the four samples using PCR and Sanger sequencing for a 187 bp subfragment of the contig. Phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 3c) showed that this novel bat PyV sequence grouped with a PyV found previously in South American bats (Fagrouch et al., 2012). The VP1 gene (GenBank accession no. KM204380) shared 76.8 % identity at the amino acid sequence level with the closest relative, bat polyomavirus 4 (GenBank accession no. JQ958887). By mapping these putative PyV sequences to the reference genome of GenBank accession no. JQ958886, the consensus contig was shown to cover 92 % of the whole genome and included some minor gaps (Fig. 3a).

Fig. 3. Identification of a putative PyV sequence. (a) Schematic representation of the location of contigs matching the PyV genome, shown as the outer dark black line. Genome positions (bp) are shown inside. (b) Proportions of gene segments in the metagenomic data matching PyV. (c) Phylogenetic tree showing the relationship of the New Zealand bat polyomavirus partial VP1 translated sequence of 203 aa (GenBank accession no. KM204380) directly from the metagenomic data with that of other polyomaviruses. The tree was compiled using the maximum-likelihood method and the Lee and Gascuel model with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Bootstrap values < 50 % are not shown. Bar, number of amino acid substitutions per site.

Fig. 3.

Open in a new tab

Caliciviridae

A total of 68 sequence reads were identified in the RNA metagenome as having similarity to caliciviruses, which were then assembled into three contigs, two matching the capsid protein and one matching the helicase protein (Fig. 4a). Two capsid protein contigs of 687 and 359 bp in length (GenBank accession nos KM204381 and KM204382, respectively) and a contig containing a helicase gene with a length of 498 bp (GenBank accession no. KM204383) were identified. The presence of the larger contig (KM204381) could only be confirmed in one of the four guano samples, achieved using Sanger sequencing and PCR for a 302 bp subfragment of the metagenomic contig. Phylogenetic analysis of the larger capsid contig suggested that this virus sequence may be from a divergent calicivirus (Fig. 4b). This contig shared 30 % amino acid sequence identity with the closest calicivirus relative norovirus, GII.1/Hu/Hawaii/71/US (GenBank accession no. U07611).

Fig. 4. Identification of putative calicivirus sequences. (a) Schematic representation of the location of contigs matching the calicivirus genome, shown as the lower black bars. (b) Phylogenetic tree showing the relationship of the New Zealand bat calicivirus translated capsid sequence (GenBank accession no. KM204381) directly from the metagenomic data with that of other caliciviruses. The tree was compiled using the maximum-likelihood method and the Lee and Gascuel model with 1000 bootstrap replicates, including the New Zealand bat calicivirus partial capsid sequence of 228 aa (GenBank accession no. KM204381). Bootstrap values < 50 % are not shown. Bar, number of amino acid substitutions per site. Asterisks (*) denote unclassified caliciviruses which have been suggested as new genera.

Fig. 4.

Open in a new tab

Phylogenetic analysis of the helicase protein showed it to be so distinct from any other calicivirus that it always formed an outgroup, even with the inclusion of a distantly related picornavirus helicase (data not shown). It is clear that a viral helicase protein (or prophage remnant) is encoded in this sequence, as it belongs to the helicase superfamily 3 (SF-3). The protein appears to contain a Walker A (AIILTGPPGCGKTT) domain (shown in bold type), Walker B domain (IVVWDD) and motif 3 (FIIICSNF) that are characteristic of viral helicases (Hickman & Dyda, 2005). A subfragment of the metagenomic contig was confirmed in two of the four guano samples using Sanger sequencing and PCR for a 234 bp subfragment of the metagenomic contig (KM204383).

Hepeviridae

In total, 156 reads from the RNA metagenome were assembled into eight contigs that showed similarity to the helicase gene of hepeviruses. Phylogenetic analysis of the longest contig of 673 bp (GenBank accession no. KM204384) determined that the closest relative was the cut-throat trout virus (Fig. 5), a proposed new genus within the family Hepeviridae (Batts et al., 2011). The New Zealand hepevirus amino acid sequence shared 30.3 % identity with its closest relative, the cut-throat trout virus (GenBank accession no. NC_015521). A 211 bp subfragment of this contig was confirmed in the RNA of all four original guano samples by using PCR and Sanger sequencing (GenBank accession no. KM204385).

Fig. 5. Identification of a putative hepevirus sequence. (a) Schematic representation of the location of contigs matching the hepevirus genome, shown as the lower black bar. (b) Phylogenetic tree showing the relationship of other hepeviruses with that of the New Zealand bat hepevirus helicase sequence of 224 aa (GenBank accession no. KM204384) obtained directly from the metagenomic data. The tree was compiled using the maximum-likelihood method and the JTT model with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Bootstrap values < 50 % are not shown. Bar, number of amino acid substitutions per site.

Fig. 5.

Open in a new tab

Other viruses

RAPSearch2 matches were also obtained for poxvirus, parvovirus, adenovirus and picornavirus (Table S1, available in the online Supplementary Material). No conserved genetic elements were identified for adenovirus or poxvirus. Of the 139 sequences assigned to poxvirus, the majority of the contigs and singleton reads were most closely related to molluscum contagiosum virus (MCV), a pathogen in humans. The MCV-like contigs and singleton reads showed between 55.6 and 75.4 % identity with another bat MCV-like sequence (GenBank accession no. NC_001731) at the protein level.

Members of the family Parvoviridae are known to infect a diverse range of hosts, including insects, and can be present as endogenous elements in the host genome. For this reason, parvoviruses were not subject to further investigation (Liu et al., 2011).

Six contigs matching members of the family Picornaviridae were identified, but only one contig contained a viable ORF. This contig only encoded 116 aa (349 bp), matching the 2C gene. It was therefore excluded from further investigation given that it encoded fewer than 150 aa, the threshold set as a requirement for phylogenetic analysis and PCR confirmation (see Methods).

Discussion

This study provides the first report of the virus diversity in the New Zealand lesser short-tailed bat, M. tuberculata. Despite extensive biogeographical isolation from other terrestrial mammals for more than 16 million years (Hand et al., 2013), the viral sequences observed in the metagenomic data were generally consistent with those observed in other metagenomic studies of bat guano. Sequences with similarity to known vertebrate viruses were identified, including poxvirus, parvovirus, papillomavirus, calicivirus, hepevirus, polyomavirus and picornavirus (and also coronavirus from a previous study; Hall et al., 2014a). It is possible that these viral sequences could have arisen as a consequence of dietary origin or subsequent to the deposition of guano by the bats, and this must be taken into consideration when interpreting these results. In addition, the polyomavirus and papillomavirus sequences were found only in the DNA virus metagenomes, so there is the possibility that these sequences were detected as endogenous/integrated elements from the host genome.

Metagenomic studies in bats from other countries have identified adenovirus (Baker et al., 2013; Drexler et al., 2011; He et al., 2013; Li et al., 2010a, b; Sonntag et al., 2009; Wu et al., 2012), papillomavirus (Ge et al., 2012; Tse et al., 2012b; Wu et al., 2012), parvovirus (Ge et al., 2012; Li et al., 2010a) and a calicivirus (sapovirus, reported by Tse et al., 2012a). It is difficult to make specific or direct comparisons with the present study due to significant methodological variation among the studies including: sample type (i.e. fresh guano, urine, roost guano), virus enrichment procedures (i.e. nuclease-treatment, centrifugation, filtration), and amplification methods and/or high-throughput sequencing platforms (Daly et al., 2011; Hall et al., 2014b). Perhaps the most comparable study is that of Baker et al. (2013), who used a metagenomic approach to examine virus diversity in African straw-coloured fruit bats (Eidolon helvum) (Baker et al., 2013). Similar to the present study, E. helvum samples (lung tissue, urine and throat swabs) contained novel adenovirus, polyomavirus, papillomavirus and MCV-like sequences (Baker et al., 2013). The mean pairwise identity of all MCV-like amino acid sequences from M. tuberculata compared with E. helvum was 65.5 %, suggesting that the New Zealand bats may host a different species of an MCV-like virus. Full-genome sequencing, or at least sequencing of the conserved major capsid protein, will be necessary before any provisional statement on species assignment of the MCV-like virus from M. tuberculata can be made.

Despite the large number of virus taxa indicated in the metagenomic data in the present study, a conservative approach was taken where: (i) only conserved genetic elements were considered, such as the capsid protein or helicase, and (ii) independent confirmation of the metagenomic data was required by specific PCR assay and Sanger sequencing of the amplicon. Given the proliferation of virus metagenomic studies, and high-profile instances of erroneous reporting of novel viruses (Naccache et al., 2014), the use of conserved genes with an independent PCR assay and Sanger sequencing as well as appropriate controls should be considered minimum requirements before reporting the discovery of new virus sequences (Rosseel et al., 2014). The most distinctive virus sequences found in this study were similar to those of caliciviruses and hepeviruses. This study is, to the best of our knowledge, only the second report of caliciviruses in bats (the first being the detection of a novel sapovirus; Tse et al., 2012a).

A major review of the family Caliciviridae removed the hepatitis E viruses from this family, placing them as the sole genus within the family Hepeviridae (Berke et al., 1997; Berke & Matson, 2000; Green et al., 2000). The discovery of a hepatitis E virus in cut-throat trout (Batts et al., 2011) has raised the possibility of an aquatic lineage of hepatitis E viruses, with the possible suggestion that this is a new genus (Batts et al., 2011; Smith et al., 2013). The putative hepevirus reported for M. tuberculata formed an alternate clade alongside the cut-throat trout hepevirus, separate from all other hepeviruses (Fig. 5b). The current classification for hepeviruses includes separate clades for rodent, bat, human and avian viruses, and it is postulated that co-divergence with the host has led to this (Drexler et al., 2012). Therefore, the divergent hepevirus in M. tuberculata could be accounted for by co-speciation of all other hepeviruses subsequent to the isolation of M. tuberculata on the Zealandia subcontinent over 16 million years ago.

M. tuberculata is listed as a vulnerable species on the IUCN Red List (http://www.iucnredlist.org/) and has an important status for the indigenous Ma¯ori population of New Zealand. It is not possible to examine any of the viruses within an experimental colony. For any of the viruses identified, culture could be attempted either in specific bat cell lines or in other permissive cell lines such as Vero. Furthermore, complete genome sequencing will allow a greater degree of certainty in taxonomic assignment and will provide additional insights into the evolutionary history of viruses in M. tuberculata. Given the more recent arrival of the related native bat species C. tuberculatus (the long-tailed bat) approximately 1 million years ago, it will be interesting to explore the viral metagenome within this species to search for evidence of these viruses. An expansion in the survey of viruses in M. tuberculata is also warranted, as the present study relied upon just four guano samples collected from one island at one time point. Indeed, given that a broad survey of viruses in both rodent and chiropteran species in New Zealand has never been conducted (there are three introduced rat species in New Zealand: Rattus rattus, Rattus exulans and Rattus norvegicus), and that similar surveys in other countries have found an abundance of virus diversity (Li et al., 2010a; Phan et al., 2011; Tse et al., 2012a), there is clearly a need to look more closely. This recommendation holds for any similarly remote or isolated area of the world. Whilst it is clear that emerging ‘hotspots’ of infectious disease require comprehensive surveys for virus diversity (Anthony et al., 2013; Jones et al., 2008), there may be additional value in examining low-diversity, remote ecosystems, as virus data could inform both the origins of virus taxa and provide a simplified model for the study of evolutionary processes such as co-divergence and cross-species transmission.

Methods

Sample collection

The collection protocols have been described previously (Hall et al., 2014a). For this study, four bat guano samples were collected from each of four separate bat roosts on Codfish Island (Whenua hou) (Fig. S1, 46° 47′ S 167° 38′ E). Samples were kept at 4 °C and nucleic acids were extracted within 48 h. M. tuberculata is found only in New Zealand and is listed as ‘nationally endangered’. Relatively small populations of this bat are present only in remote areas of unmodified old forest. The bats are highly secretive and difficult to locate, as they frequently change roost sites and also roost in trees upwards of 15 m above the forest floor. Codfish Island is an active conservation study site where movements of this bat species are well known, and thus allowed the collection of fresh guano. Access to Codfish Island is restricted to scientists and conservation staff.

Sample preparation and metagenomic sequencing

Bat guano was resuspended in 2 ml of sterile PBS, followed by centrifugation at 6000 g for 5 min. Nucleic acid was extracted from 400 μl of supernatant using an iPrep Purelink Virus kit (Life Technologies), with elution into 50 μl of RT-PCR molecular-grade water (Ambion). DNA and RNA were co-purified during extraction.

Given resource constraints, only two of the guano samples were selected for metagenomic sequencing, and the remaining two samples were used only for confirmatory PCR assays. For the purpose of finding RNA viruses, DNA was removed using DNase treatment by Ambion DNA-free (Life Technologies), and 8 μl of DNA-free RNA was incorporated into first-strand cDNA synthesis primed by random hexamers (Life Technologies), including an RNase H digestion. This step was not required for the complementary approach that sought to find DNA viruses. The cDNA and DNA from previous steps were then amplified by multiple displacement amplification using a Whole Transcriptome Amplification kit (Qiagen) to ensure that >1 μg of DNA was produced. This is the minimum amount required for library preparation using an Illumina TruSeq DNA Library Preparation kit. DNA libraries were prepared and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq2000 instrument producing 250 bp paired-end reads (New Zealand Genomics Limited). Samples were indexed using barcodes so that each metagenome could be linked specifically to the original DNA and RNA.

Bioinformatics workflow

FastQC (Andrews, 2010) was used to check sequence data quality, with reads trimmed using the FASTX-Toolkit with a base pair quality score threshold of 28 (http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/index.html). Trimmed reads were then compared with the NCBI non-redundant protein sequence database (downloaded in April 2013) using RAPSsearch2 (Ye et al., 2011; Zhao et al., 2012), an alternative to blastx (Altschul et al., 1990). Taxonomic assignment of the RAPSearch2 output was performed using megan 5.2 (Huson et al., 2007; Huson & Mitra, 2012) with a threshold for assignment of bit scores >50 and read complexity >0.44. Paired-end read data of interest was then extracted and assembled into contigs in Geneious 6.1.7 (Biomatters; http://www.geneious.com).

Confirmatory PCR

For conserved genes of interest from the metagenomic data that would allow further taxonomic assignment and phylogenetic analysis (i.e. vertebrate virus capsid, helicase or RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase gene regions), specific primers were designed using the Primer3 plug-in for Geneious 6.1.7. A 25 μl reaction volume of Invitrogen Platinum SuperMix (Life Technologies) was used as per the manufacturer's instructions, including 5 μl of DNA or cDNA. Primer sequences are detailed in Table S2. PCR products were visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis, followed by purification using USB ExoSAP-IT (Affymetrix) and Sanger sequencing on a capillary sequencer (model 3100 Avant; Applied Biosystems).

Phylogenetic analysis

The nucleotide sequences produced by the confirmatory PCR assays were translated into protein sequences and compared with reference virus genomes downloaded from GenBank. Only sequences with an ORF of >150 aa were considered for phylogenetic analysis. Sequences were aligned in mega6 (6.06) using clustal w with a gap opening penalty of 10 and gap extension penalty of 0.2 (Tamura et al., 2011). Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic trees were reconstructed in mega6 using all available amino acid sites with 1000 bootstrap replicates and the nearest-neighbour-interchange method.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Malcolm Rutherford and Peter McClelland from the New Zealand Department of Conservation for the collection of the guano samples. We would also like to acknowledge the high-throughput sequencing provided by New Zealand Genomics Ltd (NZGL), and especially to Lorraine Berry and Patrick Biggs from the Massey Genome Service. High-performance computing was provided by the New Zealand e-Science Infrastructure (NeSI). Our thanks also go to ESR IMSG, especially Steve Pyne, for providing computing infrastructure and support. This work was funded by the Crown Research Institute Core Fund from the New Zealand Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary Data

Click here for additional data file. (486.6KB, pdf)

References

  1. Altschul S.F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E.W., Lipman D.J. (1990). Basic local alignment search tool J Mol Biol 215 403–410 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrews S. (2010). FastQC: A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/.
  3. Anthony S.J., Epstein J.H., Murray K.A., Navarrete-Macias I., Zambrana-Torrelio C.M., Solovyov A., Ojeda-Flores R., Arrigo N.C., Islam A., other authors (2013). A strategy to estimate unknown viral diversity in mammals MBio 4 e00598–e00e13 10.1128/mBio.00598-13 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker K.S., Leggett R.M., Bexfield N.H., Alston M., Daly G., Todd S., Tachedjian M., Holmes C.E.G., Crameri S., other authors (2013). Metagenomic study of the viruses of African straw-coloured fruit bats: detection of a chiropteran poxvirus and isolation of a novel adenovirus Virology 441 95–106 10.1016/j.virol.2013.03.014 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Batts W., Yun S., Hedrick R., Winton J. (2011). A novel member of the family Hepeviridae from cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii) Virus Res 158 116–123 10.1016/j.virusres.2011.03.019 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Berke T., Matson D.O. (2000). Reclassification of the Caliciviridae into distinct genera and exclusion of hepatitis E virus from the family on the basis of comparative phylogenetic analysis Arch Virol 145 1421–1436 10.1007/s007050070099 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Berke T., Golding B., Jiang X., Cubitt D.W., Wolfaardt M., Smith A.W., Matson D.O. (1997). Phylogenetic analysis of the caliciviruses J Med Virol 52 419–424 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Calisher C.H., Childs J.E., Field H.E., Holmes K.V., Schountz T. (2006). Bats: important reservoir hosts of emerging viruses Clin Microbiol Rev 19 531–545 10.1128/CMR.00017-06 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chan J.F.-W., To K.K.-W., Tse H., Jin D.-Y., Yuen K.-Y. (2013a). Interspecies transmission and emergence of novel viruses: lessons from bats and birds Trends Microbiol 21 544–555 10.1016/j.tim.2013.05.005 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chan J.F.W., Lau S.K.P., Woo P.C.Y. (2013b). The emerging novel Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: the “knowns” and “unknowns” J Formos Med Assoc 112 372–381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chua K.B., Bellini W.J., Rota P.A., Harcourt B.H., Tamin A., Lam S.K., Ksiazek T.G., Rollin P.E., Zaki S.R., other authors (2000). Nipah virus: a recently emergent deadly paramyxovirus Science 288 1432–1435 10.1126/science.288.5470.1432 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Daly G.M., Bexfield N., Heaney J., Stubbs S., Mayer A.P., Palser A., Kellam P., Drou N., Caccamo M., other authors (2011). A viral discovery methodology for clinical biopsy samples utilising massively parallel next generation sequencing PLoS One 6 e28879 10.1371/journal.pone.0028879 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Drexler J.F., Corman V.M., Wegner T., Tateno A.F., Zerbinati R.M., Gloza-Rausch F., Seebens A., Müller M.A., Drosten C. (2011). Amplification of emerging viruses in a bat colony Emerg Infect Dis 17 449–456 10.3201/eid1703.100526 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Drexler J.F., Seelen A., Corman V.M., Fumie Tateno A., Cottontail V., Melim Zerbinati R., Gloza-Rausch F., Klose S.M., Adu-Sarkodie Y., other authors (2012). Bats worldwide carry hepatitis e virus-related viruses that form a putative novel genus within the family Hepeviridae J Virol 86 9134–9147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fagrouch Z., Sarwari R., Lavergne A., Delaval M., de Thoisy B., Lacoste V., Verschoor E.J. (2012). Novel polyomaviruses in South American bats and their relationship to other members of the Polyomaviridae J Gen Virol 93 2652–2657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ge X., Li Y., Yang X., Zhang H., Zhou P., Zhang Y., Shi Z. (2012). Metagenomic analysis of viruses from bat fecal samples reveals many novel viruses in insectivorous bats in China J Virol 86 4620–4630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ge X.Y., Li J.L., Yang X.L., Chmura A.A., Zhu G., Epstein J.H., Mazet J.K., Hu B., Zhang W., other authors (2013). Isolation and characterization of a bat SARS-like coronavirus that uses the ACE2 receptor Nature 503 535–538 10.1038/nature12711 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Green K.Y., Ando T., Balayan M.S., Berke T., Clarke I.N., Estes M.K., Matson D.O., Nakata S., Neill J.D., other authors (2000). Taxonomy of the caliciviruses J Infect Dis 181 (Suppl. 2), S322–S330 10.1086/315591 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hall R.J., Wang J., Peacey M., Moore N.E., McInnes K., Tompkins D.M. (2014a). New alphacoronavirus in Mystacina tuberculata bats, New Zealand Emerg Infect Dis 20 697–700 10.3201/eid2004.131441 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hall R.J., Wang J., Todd A.K., Bissielo A.B., Yen S., Strydom H., Moore N.E., Ren X., Huang Q.S., other authors (2014b). Evaluation of rapid and simple techniques for the enrichment of viruses prior to metagenomic virus discovery J Virol Methods 195 194–204 10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.08.035 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hand S.J., Worthy T.H., Archer M., Worthy J.P., Tennyson A.J.D., Schofield R.P. (2013). Miocene Mystacinids (Chiroptera, Noctilionoidea) indicate a long history for endemic bats in New Zealand J Vertebr Paleontol 33 1442–1448 10.1080/02724634.2013.775950. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. He B., Li Z., Yang F., Zheng J., Feng Y., Guo H., Li Y., Wang Y., Su N., other authors (2013). Virome profiling of bats from Myanmar by metagenomic analysis of tissue samples reveals more novel mammalian viruses PLOS ONE 8 e61950 10.1371/journal.pone.0061950 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hickman A.B., Dyda F. (2005). Binding and unwinding: SF3 viral helicases Curr Opin Struct Biol 15 77–85 10.1016/j.sbi.2004.12.001 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Huson D.H., Mitra S. (2012). Introduction to the analysis of environmental sequences: metagenomics with megan Methods Mol Biol 856 415–429 10.1007/978-1-61779-585-5_17 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Huson D.H., Auch A.F., Qi J., Schuster S.C. (2007). megan analysis of metagenomic data Genome Res 17 377–386 10.1101/gr.5969107 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Jones K.E., Patel N.G., Levy M.A., Storeygard A., Balk D., Gittleman J.L., Daszak P. (2008). Global trends in emerging infectious diseases Nature 451 990–993 10.1038/nature06536 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. King C.M. (2005). The Handbook of New Zealand Mammals Melbourne: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lau S.K.P., Woo P.C.Y., Li K.S.M., Huang Y., Tsoi H.-W., Wong B.H.L., Wong S.S.Y., Leung S.-Y., Chan K.-H., Yuen K.-Y. (2005). Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-like virus in Chinese horseshoe bats Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102 14040–14045 10.1073/pnas.0506735102 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Leroy E.M., Kumulungui B., Pourrut X., Rouquet P., Hassanin A., Yaba P., Délicat A., Paweska J.T., Gonzalez J.-P., Swanepoel R. (2005). Fruit bats as reservoirs of Ebola virus Nature 438 575–576 10.1038/438575a . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Li W., Shi Z., Yu M., Ren W., Smith C., Epstein J.H., Wang H., Crameri G., Hu Z., other authors (2005). Bats are natural reservoirs of SARS-like coronaviruses Science 310 676–679 10.1126/science.1118391 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Li L., Victoria J.G., Wang C., Jones M., Fellers G.M., Kunz T.H., Delwart E. (2010a). Bat guano virome: predominance of dietary viruses from insects and plants plus novel mammalian viruses J Virol 84 6955–6965 10.1128/JVI.00501-10 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Li Y., Ge X., Zhang H., Zhou P., Zhu Y., Zhang Y., Yuan J., Wang L.-F., Shi Z. (2010b). Host range, prevalence, and genetic diversity of adenoviruses in bats J Virol 84 3889–3897 10.1128/JVI.02497-09 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Liu H., Fu Y., Xie J., Cheng J., Ghabrial S.A., Li G., Peng Y., Yi X., Jiang D. (2011). Widespread endogenization of densoviruses and parvoviruses in animal and human genomes J Virol 85 9863–9876 10.1128/JVI.00828-11 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Luis A.D., Hayman D.T.S., O'Shea T.J., Cryan P.M., Gilbert A.T., Pulliam J.R.C., Mills J.N., Timonin M.E., Willis C.K.R., other authors (2013). A comparison of bats and rodents as reservoirs of zoonotic viruses: are bats special? Proc Biol Sci 280 20122753 10.1098/rspb.2012.2753 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Memish Z.A., Mishra N., Olival K.J., Fagbo S.F., Kapoor V., Epstein J.H., Alhakeem R., Durosinloun A., Al Asmari M., other authors (2013). Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus in bats, Saudi Arabia Emerg Infect Dis 19 1819–1823 10.3201/eid1911.131172 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Milne-Price S., Miazgowicz K.L., Munster V.J. (2014). The emergence of the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus Pathog Dis 71 121–136 10.1111/2049-632X.12166 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Murray K., Selleck P., Hooper P., Hyatt A., Gould A., Gleeson L., Westbury H., Hiley L., Selvey L., other authors (1995). A morbillivirus that caused fatal disease in horses and humans Science 268 94–97 10.1126/science.7701348 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Naccache S.N., Hackett J., Jr, Delwart E.L., Chiu C.Y. (2014). Concerns over the origin of NIH-CQV, a novel virus discovered in Chinese patients with seronegative hepatitis Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111 E976 10.1073/pnas.1317064111 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. O'Donnell C.F.J. (2001). Advances in New Zealand mammalogy 1990–2000: long-tailed bat J Roy Soc NZ 31 43–57. [Google Scholar]
  40. O'Shea T.J., Cryan P.M., Cunningham A.A., Fooks A.R., Hayman D.T., Luis A.D., Peel A.J., Plowright R.K., Wood J.L. (2014). Bat flight and zoonotic viruses Emerg Infect Dis 20 741–745 10.3201/eid2005.130539 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Phan T.G., Kapusinszky B., Wang C., Rose R.K., Lipton H.L., Delwart E.L. (2011). The fecal viral flora of wild rodents PLoS Pathog 7 e1002218 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002218 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Rosseel T., Pardon B., De Clercq K., Ozhelvaci O., Van Borm S. (2014). False-positive results in metagenomic virus discovery: a strong case for follow-up diagnosis Transbound Emerg Dis 61 293–299 10.1111/tbed.12251 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Selvey L.A., Wells R.M., McCormack J.G., Ansford A.J., Murray K., Rogers R.J., Lavercombe P.S., Selleck P., Sheridan J.W. (1995). Infection of humans and horses by a newly described morbillivirus Med J Aust 162 642–645 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Simmons N.B. (2005). Order Chiroptera. In Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, pp. 312–529. Edited by Wilson D. E. Reeder. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. [Google Scholar]
  45. Smith I., Wang L.F. (2013). Bats and their virome: an important source of emerging viruses capable of infecting humans Curr Opin Virol 3 84–91 10.1016/j.coviro.2012.11.006 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Smith D.B., Purdy M.A., Simmonds P. (2013). Genetic variability and the classification of hepatitis E virus J Virol 87 4161–4169 10.1128/JVI.02762-12 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sonntag M., Mühldorfer K., Speck S., Wibbelt G., Kurth A. (2009). New adenovirus in bats, Germany Emerg Infect Dis 15 2052–2055 10.3201/eid1512.090646 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Tamura K., Peterson D., Peterson N., Stecher G., Nei M., Kumar S. (2011). mega5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods Mol Biol Evol 28 2731–2739 10.1093/molbev/msr121 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Tse H., Chan W.M., Li K.S.M., Lau S.K.P., Woo P.C.Y., Yuen K.Y. (2012a). Discovery and genomic characterization of a novel bat sapovirus with unusual genomic features and phylogenetic position PLOS ONE 7 e34987 10.1371/journal.pone.0034987 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Tse H., Tsang A.K.L., Tsoi H.W., Leung A.S.P., Ho C.C., Lau S.K.P., Woo P.C.Y., Yuen K.Y. (2012b). Identification of a novel bat papillomavirus by metagenomics PLOS ONE 7 e43986 10.1371/journal.pone.0043986 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wang L.-F., Shi Z., Zhang S., Field H., Daszak P., Eaton B.T. (2006). Review of bats and SARS Emerg Infect Dis 12 1834–1840 10.3201/eid1212.060401 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Warrilow D. (2005). Australian bat lyssavirus: a recently discovered new rhabdovirus Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 292 25–44 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Wertheim J.O., Chu D.K.W., Peiris J.S.M., Kosakovsky Pond S.L., Poon L.L.M. (2013). A case for the ancient origin of coronaviruses J Virol 87 7039–7045 10.1128/JVI.03273-12 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Woo P.C., Lau S.K., Lam C.S., Lau C.C., Tsang A.K., Lau J.H., Bai R., Teng J.L., Tsang C.C., other authors (2012). Discovery of seven novel mammalian and avian coronaviruses in the genus deltacoronavirus supports bat coronaviruses as the gene source of alphacoronavirus and betacoronavirus and avian coronaviruses as the gene source of gammacoronavirus and deltacoronavirus J Virol 86 3995–4008 10.1128/JVI.06540-11 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Wu Z., Ren X., Yang L., Hu Y., Yang J., He G., Zhang J., Dong J., Sun L., other authors (2012). Virome analysis for identification of novel mammalian viruses in bat species from Chinese provinces J Virol 86 10999–11012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Ye Y., Choi J.-H., Tang H. (2011). RAPSearch: a fast protein similarity search tool for short reads BMC Bioinformatics 12 159 10.1186/1471-2105-12-159 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhao Y., Tang H., Ye Y. (2012). RAPSearch2: a fast and memory-efficient protein similarity search tool for next-generation sequencing data Bioinformatics 28 125–126 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr595 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data

Click here for additional data file. (486.6KB, pdf)

Articles from The Journal of General Virology are provided here courtesy of Microbiology Society

RESOURCES