Skip to main content
Journal of Physical Therapy Science logoLink to Journal of Physical Therapy Science
. 2015 Nov 30;27(11):3397–3399. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.3397

Supine effect of passive cycling movement induces vagal withdrawal

Daisuke Fujita 1,*, Kousei Kubo 2, Daisuke Takagi 1, Yuusuke Nishida 3
PMCID: PMC4681913  PMID: 26696706

Abstract

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to examine changes in vagal tone during passive exercise while supine. [Subjects and Methods] Eleven healthy males lay supine for 5 min and then performed passive cycling for 10 min using a passive cycling machine. The lower legs moved through a range of motion defined by 90° and 180° knee joint angles at 60 rpm. Respiratory rates were maintained at 0.25 Hz to elicit respiratory sinus arrhythmia. Heart rate variability was analyzed using the time domain analysis, as the root mean squared standard differences between adjacent R-R intervals (rMSSD), and spectrum domain analysis of the high frequency (HF) component. [Results] Compared to rest, passive cycling decreased rMSSD (rest, 66.6 ± 92.6 ms; passive exercise, 53.5 ± 32.5 ms). However, no significant changes in HR or HF were observed (rest, 68.2 ± 6.9 bpm, 65.6 ± 12.0 n.u.; passive exercise, 70.2 ± 7.2 bpm, 67.9 ± 10.0 n.u.). [Conclusion] These results suggest that passive exercise decreases rMMSD through supine-stimulated mechanoreceptors with no effect on HR or HF. Therefore, rMSSD is not affected by hydrostatic pressure during passive cycling in the supine position.

Key words: Passive cycling movement, Supine position, Vagal tone

INTRODUCTION

Stimulation of mechanoreceptors during passive cycling induces increases in heart rate (HR) and stroke volume (SV) in humans1, 2). These changes occur in passive exercise, but moderate intensity knee extension exercises do not induce sympathetic nerve activity3). Moreover, sympathetic nerve activation is unlikely to occur during passive cycling, particularly at HR < 100 bpm4). According to this paradigm, the neural components most likely to be responsible for increases in HR during passive cycling are afferent feedback pathways from group III mechanoreceptors and subsequent vagal withdrawal5). Passive exercise-induced changes in autonomic function are termed the mechanoreflex6).

A previous study7) suggested that the mechanoreflex contributes less to regulation of the circulatory system during exercise than other functions, such as the central command, baroreflex, and metaboreflex. However, another study reported that the mechanoreflex is occurred with over-activation of sympathetic nerves, leading to increased heart rate and systolic blood pressure in patients with heart failure compared with that in controls8). In addition, elderly individuals have significantly smaller changes in HR and cardiac output (CO) in response to passive exercise than young individuals5), demonstrating that passive exercise-induced physiological responses are affected by aging. Thus, mechanoreflex is involved in the regulation of autonomic function in heart failure8), muscle atrophy9), and peripheral arterial disease10). Therefore, the evaluation of autonomic function via the mechanoreflex has clinical importance.

Previous studies have demonstrated that passive cycling induced decreases vagal tone using passive exercise models performed in the upright seated position1, 2). Postural changes affect hydrostatic pressure associated with physiological responses11,12,13). However, the effect of passive exercise in the supine position on vagal tone remains unknown.

This study investigated passive cycling movement in the supine position induces decreasing vagal tone using heart rate variability.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Eleven healthy males (mean age, 23.0 ± 2.0 years; height, 170.4 ± 6.1 cm; weight, 63.1 ± 7.8 kg) participated in this study. The subjects did not perform exercise for the past 24 h before, or consumed caffeine fort 12 h before the measurements. This study conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki, and informed consent was obtained from all participants in accordance with the protocol of the Ethics Committee of the Seirei Christopher University (13060).

Subjects lay supine for 5 min. One minute prior to the start of passive cycling for 10 min, their ankles were placed on the pedals and set in the straps of passive cycling movement device (Room March Pro, Yuubun Ltd., Japan). The lower legs moved through a range of motion defined of 90° and 180° knee joint angles at 60 rpm. Prior to the start of passive exercise and throughout the protocol, subjects were encouraged to remain passive and resist any urge to assist with leg movement.

Electrocardiography (ECG) was performed using one lead in a standard CM5 configuration, with three silver chloride monitoring electrodes placed on the chest. ECG traces were recorded at a sampling frequency of 1,000 Hz (Powerlab and software Chart5, AD instruments, Australia). Respiratory rates were monitered by an expired gas analyzer (AE-300S, MINATO, Japan) and maintained throughout the protocol at 0.25 Hz, with 2 s exhalation and 2 s inhalation, to elicit the effect of respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA)14).

Heart rate variability was analyzed as root mean squared standard differences between adjacent R-R intervals (rMSSD) using measures in the time domain and spectrum domain analysis of the high frequency (HF) components, both of which provided information regarding parasympathetic heart modulation15).

All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation over the average data over the 5-min rest periods and 10-min passive exercise periods. rMSSD, HF, and HR were compared between rest and passive exercise using the paired t-test. The significance of all statistical tests was accepted at values of p < 0.05. All data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

RESULTS

All data are shown in Table 1. Passive exercise induced significant decreases in rMSSD (rest, 66.6 ± 92.6 ms; passive exercise, 53.5 ± 32.5 ms, p < 0.05). No significant difference in HF or HR were observed during passive exercise compared with rest (their respective values; rest, 68.2 ± 6.9 bpm, 65.6 ± 12.0 n.u.; passive exercise, 70.2 ± 7.2 bpm, 67.9 ± 10.0 n.u., p ≥ 0.05).

Table 1. HR, rMSSD and HF during rest and passive cycling movement.

Rest Passive cycling movement
HR (bpm) 68.2±6.9 70.2±7.2
rMSSD (ms) 66.6±38.0 53.5±32.5*
HF (n.u.) 65.6±12.0 67.9±10.0

Values are mean ± SD. Significantly dirrerent from rest: * p < 0.05

DISCUSSION

The present findings demonstrate that passive exercise induces decreases in rMSSD, which is an indicator of vagal tone, despite having no effect on HR or HF.

The passive exercise model used in this study allows assessment of the mechanoreflex that is independent of the effects of metaboreflex and central command5), and does not involve muscle contractions, as confirmed by the lack of changes in electromyography signals compared with rest2).

Of the three mechanoreceptor subtypes known to exist, i.e., those responsive to muscle contraction, those responsive to stretch, and those responsive to both mechanical stimuli16), passive limb movements are considered to predominantly stimulate stretch-responsive mechanoreceptors.

Activation of the mechanoreflex mediates cardio acceleration by reducing the excitability of the cardiac vagal motoneuron pool17,18). Furthermore, electrically evoked static contraction and passive stretch mechanically distort type III muscle afferents and reflexively reset the baroreflex neural arc to higher sympathetic nerve activity19), resulting in increased cardiac17) and renal18) sympathetic traffic before the activation of the metaboreflex20). Thus, the activation of the muscle mechanoreflex mediates vagal inhibition and sympatho excitation in the absence of a central command and the muscle metaboreflex. This shifting of sympatho vagal balance is not counteracted by the baroreflex because neural input from the muscle mechanoreflex resets the baroreflex operating point to a higher operating pressure19, 21) in a manner similar to that of the central command22).

This study found no change in HR in response to passive cycling when supine. A previous study23) demonstrated that SV and mean arterial pressure are unchanged in the supine position. Therefore, CO is likely solely driven by transient increases in HR because the contribution of the muscle pump is reduced and the baroreflex is not invoked while supine. The lack of change in SV in the supine position can be explained by a greater central blood volume, central venous pressure, and left ventricular end-diastolic volume24,25,26,27).

Subjects’ respiratory rates were controlled because RSA is known to affect the HF components that the decrease in the respiratory rate increases the HF component without changing the mean cardiac vagal tone28). Therefore, no significant changes in HF components were observed in response to passive exercise in the supine position. Moreover, passive cycling induced decreases in rMSSD because of vagal withdrawal in the supine position. These results from a model of passive exercise in the supine position suggest rMSSD is a more highly sensitive indicator of cardiac vagal tone than the HF component during very low intensity exercise, such as passive cycling movement.

In conclusion, passive cycling in the supine position induced decreases in vagal tone with no effect on the HF components or HR. These findings indicate rMSSD is a more sensitive indicator of the mechanoreflex during passive cycling than the measurements of the HF components.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Nóbrega AC, Williamson JW, Friedman DB, et al. : Cardiovascular responses to active and passive cycling movements. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 1994, 26: 709–714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nurhayati Y, Boutcher SH: Cardiovascular response to passive cycle exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 1998, 30: 234–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wray DW, Fadel PJ, Keller DM, et al. : Dynamic carotid baroreflex control of the peripheral circulation during exercise in humans. J Physiol, 2004, 559: 675–684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Robinson BF, Epstein SE, Beiser GD, et al. : Control of heart rate by the autonomic nervous system. Studies in man on the interrelation between baroreceptor mechanisms and exercise. Circ Res, 1966, 19: 400–411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McDaniel J, Hayman MA, Ives S, et al. : Attenuated exercise induced hyperaemia with age: mechanistic insight from passive limb movement. J Physiol, 2010, 588: 4507–4517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vianna LC, Oliveira RB, Ramos PS, et al. : Effect of muscle mass on muscle mechanoreflex-mediated heart rate increase at the onset of dynamic exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2010, 108: 429–434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nishiyasu T, Maekawa T, Sone R, et al. : Effects of rhythmic muscle compression on cardiovascular responses and muscle oxygenation at rest and during dynamic exercise. Exp Physiol, 2006, 91: 103–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Middlekauff HR, Chiu J, Hamilton MA, et al. : Muscle mechanoreceptor sensitivity in heart failure. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 2004, 287: H1937–H1943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hayashi N, Koba S, Yoshida T: Disuse atrophy increases the muscle mechanoreflex in rats. J Appl Physiol 1985, 2005, 99: 1442–1445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Muller MD, Drew RC, Blaha CA, et al. : Oxidative stress contributes to the augmented exercise pressor reflex in peripheral arterial disease patients. J Physiol, 2012, 590: 6237–6246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Doufesh H, Ibrahim F, Ismail NA, et al. : Assessment of heart rates and blood pressure in different salat positions. J Phys Ther Sci, 2013, 25: 211–214. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kim MK, Hwangbo G: Effect of position on measured lung capacity of patients with spinal cord injury. J Phys Ther Sci, 2012, 24: 655–657. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tsubaki A, Deguchi S, Yoneda Y: Influence of posture on respiratory function and respiratory muscle strength in normal subjects. J Phys Ther Sci, 2009, 21: 71–74. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hirsch JA, Bishop B: Respiratory sinus arrhythmia in humans: how breathing pattern modulates heart rate. Am J Physiol, 1981, 241: H620–H629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology: Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Circulation, 1996, 93: 1043–1065. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gladwell VF, Coote JH: Heart rate at the onset of muscle contraction and during passive muscle stretch in humans: a role for mechanoreceptors. J Physiol, 2002, 540: 1095–1102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Murata J, Matsukawa K: Cardiac vagal and sympathetic efferent discharges are differentially modified by stretch of skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 2001, 280: H237–H245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Matsukawa K, Wall PT, Wilson LB, et al. : Reflex responses of renal nerve activity during isometric muscle contraction in cats. Am J Physiol, 1990, 259: H1380–H1388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yamamoto K, Kawada T, Kamiya A, et al. : Muscle mechanoreflex induces the pressor response by resetting the arterial baroreflex neural arc. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 2004, 286: H1382–H1388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kaufman MP, Hayes SG: The exercise pressor reflex. Clin Auton Res, 2002, 12: 429–439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Potts JT, Mitchell JH: Rapid resetting of carotid baroreceptor reflex by afferent input from skeletal muscle receptors. Am J Physiol, 1998, 275: H2000–H2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.DiCarlo SE, Bishop VS: Central baroreflex resetting as a means of increasing and decreasing sympathetic outflow and arterial pressure. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2001, 940: 324–337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Trinity JD, McDaniel J, Venturelli M, et al. : Impact of body position on central and peripheral hemodynamic contributions to movement-induced hyperemia: implications for rehabilitative medicine. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 2011, 300: H1885–H1891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bevegard S, Holmgren A, Jonsson B: The effect of body position on the circulation at rest and during exercise, with special reference to the influence on the stroke volume. Acta Physiol Scand, 1960, 49: 279–298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ekelund LG: Circulatory and respiratory adaptation during prolonged exercise. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl, 1967, 292: 1–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.González-Alonso J, Mora-Rodríguez R, Coyle EF: Supine exercise restores arterial blood pressure and skin blood flow despite dehydration and hyperthermia. Am J Physiol, 1999, 277: H576–H583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Poliner LR, Dehmer GJ, Lewis SE, et al. : Left ventricular performance in normal subjects: a comparison of the responses to exercise in the upright and supine positions. Circulation, 1980, 62: 528–534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hayano J, Mukai S, Sakakibara M, et al. : Effects of respiratory interval on vagal modulation of heart rate. Am J Physiol, 1994, 267: H33–H40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Physical Therapy Science are provided here courtesy of Society of Physical Therapy Science

RESOURCES