In the article by M. Laporte, S. M. Rogers, A.-M. Dion-Côté, E. Normandeau, P.-A. Gagnaire, et al. (G3 (Bethesda) 5: 1481−1491) entitled “RAD-QTL Mapping Reveals Both Genome-Level Parallelism and Different Genetic Architecture Underlying the Evolution of Body Shape in Lake Whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) Species Pairs,” on pages 1484 and 1485, the legends for Figures 2 and 3 were erroneously reversed. As a result of this error, the legends for these figures are incorrect and should be exchanged, as follows:
Figure 2 Fish shape variation among individuals along PC1 and PC2 in all five lakes. Each dot represents an individual (black color = normal species; white color = dwarf species). The means fish shape for each species lakes combination also were indicated (circle = Cliff; square = East; diamond = Indian; upper triangle = Témiscouata and lower triangle = Webster).
Figure 3 Mean shape comparisons between normal (white dot; dashed line) and dwarf Whitefish (black dot; full line) for Cliff, East, Indian, Témiscouata, and Webster lakes. Red arrows show how shape changes from normal to dwarf Whitefish.