Abstract
Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is a metabolite and signaling molecule in biological tissues that regulates many physiological processes. Reliable and sensitive methods for H2S analysis are necessary for a better understanding of H2S biology and for the pharmacological modulation of H2S levels in vivo. In this chapter, we describe the use of gas chromatography coupled to sulfur chemiluminescence detection to measure the rates of H2S production and degradation by tissue homogenates at physiologically relevant concentrations of substrates. This method allows separation of H2S from other sulfur compounds and provides sensitivity of detection to ~15 pg (or 0.5 pmol) of H2S per injected sample.
1. INTRODUCTION
Reliable detection of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) in biological samples is challenging due to its volatility, redox lability, and most importantly, its low steady-state concentrations (Kabil & Banerjee, 2010). These difficulties combined with the use of methods that are not specific for measurement of free sulfide at physiological pH, have resulted in reports in the literature of H2S concentrations spanning five orders of magnitude ranging from the tens of nanomolar to hundreds of micromolar (Olson, 2009). This ambiguity in the physiologically relevant concentration of H2S has, in turn, resulted in the use of widely varying concentrations of sulfide donors to elicit physiological effects. H2S is a product of sulfur metabolism (Kabil & Banerjee, 2010; Kabil, Vitvitsky, & Banerjee, 2014) and is synthesized and degraded by mammalian tissues at relatively high rates ( Jurkowska et al., 2014; Vitvitsky, Kabil, & Banerjee, 2012). The methods used for H2S detection have been discussed in Olson (2012) and include colorimetric analysis monitoring methylene blue formation, use of a sulfide ion-selective or a polarographic electrode, gas chromatography (GC) with flame photometric or sulfur chemiluminescence detection, ion chromatography, HPLC analysis of the monobromobimane derivative of sulfide with fluorescence detection, and the use of sulfide-sensitive fluorescent dyes. Using the GC-coupled sulfur chemiluminescence detection method for H2S, recent studies have converged on low nanomolar concentrations of H2S in biological samples (Furne, Saeed, & Levitt, 2008; Kabil, Vitvitsky, Xie, & Banerjee, 2011; Levitt, Abdel-Rehim, & Furne, 2011; Vitvitsky et al., 2012). In this chapter, we describe the application of the GC-based sulfur chemiluminescence method for H2S detection in biological samples.
2. PRINCIPLE OF THE GC-COUPLED SULFUR CHEMILUMINESCENCE METHOD
Analysis of H2S levels in biological samples using GC with sulfur chemiluminescence detection relies on the equilibration of H2S between the liquid sample and gas phases in a hermetically sealed sample chamber. H2S present in the gas phase is measured following GC separation from other sulfur compounds and detected using a 355 sulfur chemiluminescence detector (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). In the detector, the sample undergoes combustion in the furnace generating sulfur monoxide, which reacts with ozone in the reaction cell to form sulfur dioxide emitting light (Fig. 1). The light intensity is measured using a photomultiplier tube and the signal is linearly proportional to the quantity of sulfur in the sample. The GC method allows separation of H2S from different natural sulfur compounds (Fig. 2) (Levitt, Furne, Springfield, Suarez, & DeMaster, 1999). The sensitivity of the instrument allows detection of 0.5 pg of sulfur and the linear range spans approximately four orders of magnitude based on the vendor’s information.
Figure 1.
Scheme showing analysis of sulfur compounds using GC coupled to a sulfur chemiluminescence detector (SCD). Sulfur compounds in the sample are separated on a GC column prior to entering the SCD. In the reaction furnace, the samples undergo combustion in an air and hydrogen mixture producing sulfur monoxide. In the reaction cell, sulfur monoxide reacts with ozone to produce sulfur dioxide and light emission. The latter is detected using a photomultiplier tube (PMT).
Figure 2.
Analysis of a mixture of sulfur gases using GC–SCD. The mixture (200 μl total injection volume) contained 2.7 ppm H2S, 5 ppm carbonyl sulfide (COS), 5 ppm 3-methanethiol (CH3SH), 5 ppm ethanethiol (CH3CH2SH), and 5 ppm 5-dimethylsulfide (CH3SCH3) in N2.
2.1. Limitations of the GC method
The sensitivity of the method is influenced by parameters such as column type, injection volume, injection mode, and gas flow rate, which affect the amount of sample that reaches the detector. Hence, these parameters must be adjusted to optimize sensitivity prior to sample analysis. A second issue that influences the sensitivity of this method is that low H2S concentrations necessitate injection of relatively large samples volumes. Modern GC capillary columns with a maximal available inner diameter of 0.53 mm are not suitable for injection of more than 1 ml of a gas sample. Packed columns allow injection of up to 10 ml of gas samples and significantly enhance sensitivity of H2S analysis. Unfortunately, the newest 355 sulfur chemiluminescence detector does not interface with packed columns.
3. PROTOCOL FOR GC-COUPLED SULFUR CHEMILUMINESCENCE DETECTION OF H2S
3.1. Materials
NORM-JECT polypropylene syringes (Henke Sass Wolf, Tuttlingen, Germany)
Plastic three-way stopcocks (Smiths Medical ASD, Dublin, OH)
Sleeve stopper septa for 5 mm NMR tubes (white, 1.5 × 3.9 i.d. × o.d., Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO)
Tedlar gas sample bag (Jensen Inert Products, Coral Spring, FL)
Gas-tight glass syringe with PTFE plunger and stainless steel needle (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA)
H2S calibration mixture, 40 ppm H2S in N2 (Cryogenic Gases, Detroit, MI)
Mixture of natural sulfur gases in N2 (Cryogenic Gases, Detroit, MI)
Ultrahigh purity grade helium, H2, and N2 cylinders (Cryogenic Gases, Detroit, MI)
Zero grade air cylinder (Cryogenic Gases, Detroit, MI)
DB-1 capillary column (30 m × 0.53 mm × 1.0 μm, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA)
3.2. Calibration standards
For instrument calibration, gas cylinders containing either 40 ppm H2S in N2 or a mixture of 10 ppm each of carbonyl sulfide (COS), methanethiol (CH3SH), ethanethiol (CH3CH2SH), and dimethylsulfide (CH3SCH3) in N2 are obtained from Cryogenic Gases (Detroit, MI, USA). For routine instrument calibration, ~1 l of 40 ppm H2S in N2 was kept in a Tedlar gas sample bag in which the valve was sealed with sleeve stopper septum. The H2S concentration in the bag was stable over the course of the day and the bag was refilled daily with fresh calibration standards.
3.3. Sample manipulation
H2S disappears rapidly if kept in glass containers or if exposed to rubber (e.g., stoppers). Hence, disposable polypropylene syringes were utilized for sample handling. The sample is placed in the barrel of a syringe and the syringe is sealed with a plunger. The syringe tip is fitted with a three-way stopcock, which is used to make the sample anaerobic by flushing the syringe with N2. During sample incubation, the top of the three-way stopcock is sealed with a small-sleeve stopper septum. Gas aliquots for measurement of H2S levels are collected from the syringe through the septa and injected into the GC using a gas-tight glass syringe with a PTFE plunger and stainless steel needle. Since H2S levels are stable in glass syringes for at least 5 min, they are suitable for sample injection. Aliquots of standard H2S mixture (40 ppm in N2) are added when needed, through the septa into the syringes filled with N2 to obtain different dilutions for instrument calibration.
3.4. Chromatography conditions
Gas samples were injected into an Agilent 6890 Series Gas Chromatograph equipped with a DB-1 capillary column. The following chromatographic conditions were found to provide optimal sensitivity and resolution: manual splitless injection, inlet temperature 105 °C, total gas flow rate 29.9 ml min−1, column gas flow rate 2 ml min−1, detector outlet temperature 150 °C. Helium is used as a carrier gas. The oven temperature is maintained at 30 °C during sample injection and analysis, increased to 110 ° C at the end of the run at a rate of 20 °C min−1, and maintained at 110 °C for 2 min before returning to the initial conditions. The oven temperature is increased to 110 °C in order to clean the column from possible contamination with organic substances and water present in the injected samples.
H2S analysis in a single sample takes ~2 min. The total run cycle including the temperature gradient and restoration to initial conditions takes ~20 min. In our hands, the linear range of this method extends over two orders of magnitude (Fig. 3), and the sensitivity of detection is ~15 pg (i.e., 0.5 pmol) of H2S per injection. We estimate that sensitivity could be enhanced ~5-fold by direct sample injection onto the column and even further, using a packed column.
Figure 3.
Linear dependence of the H2S peak area on H2S amount. The symbols and line represent the experimental data and linear fit, respectively. Each experimental point represents the mean ± SD of 2–4 independent measurements. In most cases, the standard deviation is equal to or less than the symbol size. Samples (200 μl) containing different amounts of H2S were prepared by dilution of the stock solution (40 ppm H2S) with N2.
4. ANALYSIS OF BIOLOGICAL SAMPLES
4.1. Monitoring H2S production in tissue homogenate
Substrates for H2S production (cysteine, homocysteine, or both for cystathionine β-synthase and γ-cystathionase and mercaptopyruvate and a reductant such as dithiothreitol or dihydrolipoic acid for mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase) are added to tissue homogenates prepared as described (Kabil et al., 2011; Vitvitsky et al., 2012). The sample with a total volume of 0.5 ml is placed in the barrel of a 20-ml polypropylene syringe attached to a three-way stopcock. The syringe is sealed with a plunger and made anaerobic by flushing the headspace with N2 five times using the three-way stopcock (Fig. 4) and filled with N2 to a total volume (liquid+gas) of 20 ml. Then, the stopcock is disconnected from the source of N2 and sealed with a sleeve stopper septum, and the syringe is incubated for 20 min at 37 °C with gentle shaking (75 rpm). Control samples in which the tissue homogenate is replaced by buffer are prepared and incubated in parallel. Aliquots (200 μl) from the gas phase of the reaction syringes are collected using a gas-tight syringe through the sleeve stopper septum attached to the stopcock, and injected into the GC. For samples containing a high concentration of H2S, a 20-fold dilution with N2 is used to prevent column overloading. For this, 0.5 ml of the sample is injected into a syringe filled with 9.5 ml of N2. Then, 200 μl of the diluted sample is injected into the GC.
Figure 4.
Scheme showing setup for sample preparation. The solid arrows depict the direction of N2 flow, the movement of the syringe plunger and movement of the three-way stopcock valve during flushing of the syringe with N2. The dashed arrow indicates the position where the sleeve stopper septum is attached during sample incubation.
Different dilutions of the H2S gas calibration mixture (40 ppm in N2) are prepared using N2. Aliquots (200 μl) of the varying H2S dilutions in N2 are injected into the GC and the corresponding peak areas are used to generate a standard curve. The concentration of H2S in the injected sample is calculated from the peak area using the calibration coefficient obtained from the standard curve. The total amount of H2S in syringes needed to estimate the H2S production rates in tissues is calculated as described below in Section 4.3. It is important for H2S concentration estimations and for instrument response linearity that the injection volume of the samples and calibration gas mixture are the same.
Typically, since peaks other than H2S are not observed in these samples, multiple injections can be made during a single run cycle (Fig. 5). For this, the oven temperature in the GC is maintained at 30 °C for 20 min during which several (up to 10) injections of sample and calibration gas aliquots can be made. Following this, the temperature is increased to complete the run cycle. Usually, the calibration mixture containing 40 ppm H2S in N2 is injected with each analytical run to control for variability.
Figure 5.
A representative chromatogram of H2S production by murine liver homogenate at different cysteine concentrations. Peaks 1–3 were obtained after anaerobic incubation for 20 min of the homogenate (pH 7.4, 37 °C) with 0.1, 0.2, and 0.5 mM cysteine, respectively. The arrow indicates the control sample lacking cysteine.
4.2. Monitoring H2S degradation in tissue homogenates
Tissue homogenate (0.5 ml) is placed in the barrel of a 20-ml polypropylene syringe attached to a three-way stopcock and the syringe is sealed with a plunger. For anaerobic assays, the syringe headspace is flushed five times with N2 using a three-way stopcock (Fig. 4) and then filled with N2 to a total volume (liquid+gas) of 10 ml. Then, 10 ml of the H2S gas mixture (40 ppm in N2) corresponding to 17.9 nmoles H2S is added to the syringe using the three-way stopcock to give a final volume of 20 ml. For aerobic assays, the syringe headspace is filled with air to a total volume (liquid+gas) of 10 ml and 10 ml of the H2S gas mixture (40 ppm in N2) is added using a three-way stopcock, to give a final volume of 20 ml. The syringes are incubated at room temperature (25 °C) with stirring and 200 μl aliquots are collected from the gas phase over 20 min and as described above, multiple samples and the calibration standard are injected per GC run cycle (Fig. 6). The concentration of H2S in the samples is determined from the peak area using a calibration coefficient as described in the next section.
Figure 6.
A representative chromatogram showing the kinetics of aerobic H2S degradation by murine liver homogenate. The numbers correspond to samples (200 μl) removed at 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 15 min following incubation of liver homogenate with H2S at 25 °C. The calibration peak (12.2 ng H2S) is denoted by Std. The inset shows the kinetics of H2S disappearance. The amount of H2S at t = 0, shows the amount of H2S added to the reaction mixture.
4.3. Estimation of H2S production and degradation rates
To determine the rates of H2S production and degradation, the total amount of H2S in the reaction syringe needs to be calculated taking into account its equilibration between the gas and liquid phases and its dissociation at the pH of the reaction mixture. In the samples described above, the amount of H2S in the gas phase is equal to the H2S concentration in the sample aliquots multiplied by the total gas phase volume (i.e., 19.5 ml). The amount of dissolved H2S present in the liquid phase is calculated by multiplying the concentration of H2S in the gas phase by 1.6, which is the equilibrium ratio between the concentration of H2S in the gas and liquid phases at 37 °C (Furne et al., 2008) and by the volume of the liquid (0.5 ml). The amount of dissolved sulfide anion (HS−) in the liquid phase is calculated using a pKa of 6.8 for ionization of H2S in water at 37 °C (Hershey, Plese, & Millero, 1988). The total amount of H2S in the sample is then the sum of the amounts of H2S in the gas phase, dissolved H2S, and HS−. The pKa for H2S is influenced by the ionic strength (Almgren, Dyrssen, Elgquist, & Johansson, 1976; Hershey et al., 1988; Millero, 1986) and is expected to decrease from 6.8 in water to ~6.6 at physiologically relevant salt concentrations. Under our experimental conditions with a gas:liquid ratio of 39:1, the majority (~80%) of the H2S in the reaction mixture is present in the gas phase at pH 7.4. Since adjusting the pKa value from 6.8 to 6.6 changes the total H2S value by <10%, a pKa value of 6.8 was employed in our calculations. The rate of H2S production is then determined by subtracting the sum of H2S amounts in the gas and liquid phases in the control from the sample and dividing that value by the incubation time and the wet weight of the tissue. Since the H2S degradation kinetics are measured at 25 °C a value of 2.0 for the equilibrium ratio for H2S in the gas versus liquid phase (Furne et al., 2008) and a pKa value of 7.0 (Hershey et al., 1988) are used in the calculations.
The total amount of sulfide in the reaction mixture (ST) needed to calculate the rate of H2S production and degradation is the sum of the sulfide amounts in the gas (SGas) and liquid (SLiq) phases of the mixture (Eq. 1).
| (1) |
From the peak area of the sample injected into the GC, one can calculate the concentration (S[Gas]) and the amount (SGas) of H2S in the gas phase of the reaction mixture using Eqs. (2) and (3).
| (2) |
| (3) |
Here A is the peak area of H2S in the sample, C is the calibration coefficient (i.e., the peak area corresponding to 1 M H2S) obtained from the standard curve and VGas is the volume of the gas phase in the reaction mixture. The total sulfide amount in the liquid phase of the reaction mixture (SLiq) is the sum of the amount of dissolved undissociated (SH2S) and ionized (SHS−) forms (Eq. 4).
| (4) |
The amount of dissolved sulfide depends on the concentration in the liquid phase of the undissociated (S|H2S|) and dissociated (|HS−|) forms and on the liquid volume (VLiq) (Eqs. 5 and 6).
| (5) |
| (6) |
The concentration of undissociated H2S in the liquid phase is determined using the equilibrium ratio (R) between the gas and liquid phases (Eq. 7) and depends on the temperature.
| (7) |
Similarly, the concentration of the dissolved ionized sulfide (S|HS−|) is determined using the pKa value for the dissociation of H2S to sulfide anion (Eq. 8) taking into account the pH of the liquid phase.
| (8) |
The total amount of sulfide in the reaction mixture is obtained from the sample peak area (A), the calibration coefficient (C), the volumes of the gas (VGas) and liquid (VLiq) phases, the pH of the liquid phase, the equilibrium ratio for H2S between the gas and liquid phase, and the pKa value of H2S (Eq. 9), which simplifies to Eq. (10).
| (9) |
| (10) |
5. ADDITIONAL TECHNICAL DETAILS
5.1. Column conditioning
The protocol recommended for conditioning a new capillary column includes heating it to 250 °C. However, this procedure is very detrimental for the catalytic element in the sulfur chemiluminescence detector and leads to a significant drop in detector sensitivity. Hence, the column must be disconnected from the detector and the inlet to the detector must be plugged with an external nut and no-hole ferrule before the column is heated to 250 °C. In our experience, heating the capillary column to >200 °C causes a significant loss in the detector sensitivity and requires replacement of the catalytic element in the reaction furnace, i.e., the small ceramic tube, if the sulfur chemiluminesce detector is not disconnected from the column.
5.2. Additional gas purification
The sensitivity of the detector declines rapidly if the helium and hydrogen carrier gases are not purified prior to their use due to the presence of trace contaminants, particularly hydrocarbons. To increase the lifetime of the small ceramic tube, inline cartridges can be used to remove contaminants from the gases. Use of the Big Universal Trap RMSH-2 cartridge for helium and the Big Universal Trap RMSHY-2 cartridge (Agilent Technologies) for hydrogen helps maintain detector sensitivity with regular usage over a period of a year. Zero grade air does not require additional purification.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (HL58984 and GM112455).
References
- Almgren T, Dyrssen D, Elgquist B, Johansson O. Dissociation of hydrogen sulphide in seawater and comparison of pH scales. Marine Chemistry. 1976;4:289–297. [Google Scholar]
- Furne J, Saeed A, Levitt MD. Whole tissue hydrogen sulfide concentrations are orders of magnitude lower than presently accepted values. American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2008;295(5):R1479–R1485. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.90566.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hershey JP, Plese T, Millero FJ. The pK1 for the dissociation of H2S in various ionic media. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 1988;52:2047–2051. [Google Scholar]
- Jurkowska H, Roman HB, Hirschberger LL, Sasakura K, Nagano T, Hanaoka K, et al. Primary hepatocytes from mice lacking cysteine dioxygenase show increased cysteine concentrations and higher rates of metabolism of cysteine to hydrogen sulfide and thiosulfate. Amino Acids. 2014;46(5):1353–1365. doi: 10.1007/s00726-014-1700-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kabil O, Banerjee R. The redox biochemistry of hydrogen sulfide. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2010;285:21903–21907. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R110.128363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kabil O, Vitvitsky V, Banerjee R. Sulfur as a signaling nutrient through hydrogen sulfide. Annual Review of Nutrition. 2014;34:171–205. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071813-105654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kabil O, Vitvitsky V, Xie P, Banerjee R. The quantitative significance of the transsulfuration enzymes for h2s production in murine tissues. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling. 2011;15:363–372. doi: 10.1089/ars.2010.3781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Levitt MD, Abdel-Rehim MS, Furne J. Free and acid-labile hydrogen sulfide concentrations in mouse tissues: Anomalously high free hydrogen sulfide in aortic tissue. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling. 2011;15:373–378. doi: 10.1089/ars.2010.3525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Levitt MD, Furne J, Springfield J, Suarez F, DeMaster E. Detoxification of hydrogen sulfide and methanethiol in the cecal mucosa. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1999;104(8):1107–1114. doi: 10.1172/JCI7712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Millero FJ. The thermodynamics and kinetics of the hydrogen sulfide system in natural waters. Marine Chemistry. 1986;18:121–147. [Google Scholar]
- Olson KR. Is hydrogen sulfide a circulating “gasotransmitter” in vertebrate blood? Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2009;1787(7):856–863. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2009.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Olson KR. A practical look at the chemistry and biology of hydrogen sulfide. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling. 2012;17(1):32–44. doi: 10.1089/ars.2011.4401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vitvitsky V, Kabil O, Banerjee R. High turnover rates for hydrogen sulfide allow for rapid regulation of its tissue concentrations. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling. 2012;17(1):22–31. doi: 10.1089/ars.2011.4310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]






