Abstract
Rett syndrome (RTT) is a severe neurodevelopmental disorder caused by mutations in the X chromosomal gene Methyl-CpG-binding Protein 2 (MECP2) (1). RTT treatment so far is symptomatic. Mecp2 disruption in mice phenocopies major features of the syndrome (2) that can be reversed upon re-expression of Mecp2 (3. It has recently been reported that transplantation of wild type (WT) bone marrow (BMT) into lethally irradiated Mecp2tm1.1Jae/y mice prevented neurologic decline and early death by restoring microglial phagocytic activity against apoptotic targets (4). Based on this report, clinical trials of BMT for patients with RTT have been initiated (5). We aimed to replicate and extend the BMT experiments in three different RTT mouse models but found that despite robust microglial engraftment, BMT from WT donors did not rescue early death or ameliorate neurologic deficits. Furthermore, early and specific genetic expression of Mecp2 in microglia did not rescue Mecp2-deficient mice. In conclusion our experiments do not support BMT as therapy for RTT.
We first sought to replicate BMT-mediated rescue of male mice derived from the same Mecp2tm1.1Jae/y colony from the original report (4), implementing established standards for conducting preclinical studies (2,6). Mice were maintained on C57Bl/6J background, which was confirmed in recipient animals by genome scanning (data available upon request). Four week-old Mecp2tm1.1Jae/y mice and wild type littermates were subjected to the same protocol of lethal split-dose γ-irradiation and randomized to receive tail vein injection of bone marrow from Mecp2-deficient male littermates or bone marrow from Mecp2-proficient animals including C57Bl/6J male mice ubiquitously expressing GFP and Mecp2+/y littermates of the recipients. All animals achieved multilineage peripheral blood engraftment judged by the fraction of donor-derived GFP-expressing cells in peripheral blood 4 and 8 weeks post-transplant (Extended Data Figure 1a). PCR analysis of blod and tail tissue 4 weeks after transplant also confirmed expression of the appropriate mutant or WT variant of Mecp2 in blood in all groups (Extended Data Figure 1b). Microglial engaftment in brain parenchyma, 30 and 90 days post-transplant was similar in mutant and WT recipients engrafted with marrow from WT mice ubiquitously expressing a GFP transgene, (Fig. 1, A and B, and Extended Data Figure 1c), and comparable to engraftment observed by Derecki et al. (4) and others (7).
Contrary to our expectation, Mecp2tm1.1Jae/y mice that received Mecp2+/y marrow had no extension of lifespan compared to Mecp2tm1.1Jae/y marrow recipients (Fig. 1C). No difference in survival was observed in mutant animals that received Mecp2+/y marrow from WT littermates or C57Bl/6J animals ubiquitously expressing GFP (Extended Data Figure 1d). We also observed no benefit in outcome measures at 12 weeks of age, 8 weeks after transplant, including weight, breathing, locomotion, general condition, walking gait, tremor, hindlimb clasping or neurological score (Figure 1i). Thus, the same BMT procedure with substantially greater numbers of animals,randomly assigned to treatment group, from the same Mecp2tm1.1Jae/y mouse colony did not replicate any aspects of protection reported by Derecki et al (4). Furthermore,histologic analysis blind to genotype and treatment group showed no neuropathologic evidence of differential apoptosis, microglial response, or tissue degeneration between experimental groups (Extended Data Figure 1e). No protective effect on survival was noted in two additional mouse models of Rett syndrome as well (Figure 1, e and g): Mecp2LucHyg/y mice (Extended Data Figure 2), and Mecp2R168X/y mice (8), despite excellent engraftment after BMT (Extended Data Figure 2). Experiments with these two models were performed in independent laboratories following the same BMT protocol (4).
In all models, WT mice transplanted with WT bone marrow showed no mortality, indicating the procedure was well tolerated (Figure 1, c, e, and g). Likewise, BMT was well-tolerated by mutant animals, as Mecp2 mutant animals receiving mutant marrow exhibited either no change (Mecp2LucHyg/y and Mecp2R168X/y mice), or, surprisingly, slightly reduced mortality (Mecp2tm1.1Jae/y mice) compared to naive mice not subjected to BMT (Figure 1, d, f and h). The small survival extension may be related to a salutary effect of post-irradiation antibiotic treatment of transplanted animals, to which naive animals were not exposed, or to differences in animal handling (9).
To further address the role for microglia in RTT reported by Derecki et al (4), we used the Cre/lox system and a lox-stop-lox allele of Mecp2 (Mecp2LSL) to examine the effect of genetically-driven expression of Mecp2 in microglia during development. First, we analyzed the suitability of the LysM-Cre transgene, which was used by Derecki et al (4) in their genetic Mecp2LSL/y rescue experiments (4), to drive efficient microglia-specific gene restoration. As previously reported (10), LysM-Cre driven dTomato reporter cells account for less than 25% of microglia, as assessed using flow cytometry of microglia derived from mice containing the LysM-Cre transgene and a transgene expressing Cre-dependent dTomato (Extended Data Figure 3a). Furthermore, when we generated LysM-Cre; Mecp2LSL/Y mice, we observed MeCP2 expression in neurons (large NeuN+ cells) in many brain regions (Extended Data Figure 3b). To identify a Cre transgenic line that drives efficient expression within microglia, we next evaluated Vav1-Cre transgene, which selectively expresses throughout the hematopoietic compartment (11). In contrast to LysM-Cre, Vav1-Cre transgene targeted microglia with high efficiency (Figure 2a) and specificity (Figure 2b). As Vav1-Cre-driven expression in brain proved to be efficient and restricted to microglia, we applied this system to test whether expression of Mecp2 in microglia rescues Mecp2-null mice. To quantify Mecp2 restoration in microglia, we utilized the fms-GFP transgene, expression of which within brain is restricted to microglia, for flow sorting (11) (Extended Data Figure 3c). Microglia derived from Vav1-Cre; Mecp2LSL/Y animals expressed Mecp2 mRNA at 75% of the level of Mecp2 mRNA in microglia derived from Mecp2+/Y animals (Figure 2c). Similar to other Mecp2-null mouse models, Mecp2LSL/Y animals showed hypoactivity, poor motor coordination on parallel rod walking, increased basal and hypoxia breathing rate, increased apneas, and early death, none of which were improved by Mecp2 expression in microglia of Vav1-Cre; Mecp2LSL/Y animals (Figure 2, d–h). We thus conclude that, in contrast to the data reported by Derecki et al. (4), driving Mecp2 expression developmentally in microglia does not ameliorate the phenotype of MeCP2-null mice.
In conclusion, we observe no benefit of BMT-mediated delivery of WT microglia into the brains of three different preclinical models of RTT, nor do we observe a causative role of microglia in the disease process. Our BMT studies included large numbers of mice derived from the same parent colony used in the original report (4), with treatment assigned randomly and analysis conducted blind to genotype and treatment group. Finally, we showed that even early and highly efficient genetically-driven Mecp2 expression in microglia of Mecp2-null mice conferred no protective effect. Restoration of MeCP2 in microglia using bone marrow transplantation or genetics does not rescue the major observed phenotypes in RTT, which argues against the previously proposed therapeutic potential of BMT in patients with RTT (4).
METHODS SUMMARY
Details of procedures and reagents are described in Methods.
Extended Data
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by research funds from the Rett Syndrome Research Trust to A.A.P, A.B. and M.S.B., NIH grant P5OAGO5136 and and R01AG031892 to C.D.K, the Nancy and Buster Alvord Endowment to D.K.,the German Research Foundation Grant HU 941/2-1 to P.H., the German-Israel Foundation (GIF) grant 1048/2009 to P.H., a National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute grant U01HL100395 to I.D.B., and the Winship Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA138292) to D.J.B. H.D.J. is supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. 2012140236-02. This project was supported by NIH/NICHD (R01HD062553 to JLN), research funds from the International Rett Syndrome Foundation to JLN, Baylor College of Medicine (BCM) Cytometry and Cell Sorting Core with funding from the NIH (NCRR grant S10RR024574, NIAID AI036211 and NCI P30CA125123), from the BCM Mouse Neurobehavioral Core funded by the BCM-IDDRC (P30HD024064) from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Development of the National Institutes of Health. The authors thank Jonathan Kipnis and Noel Derecki for careful training of the investigators on bone marrow transplantation in mice and for in-depth discussion of the results, Anjali Rajadhyaksha and Aaron Katzman for helpful discussion, Mark Sands for thorough review of BMT studies and discussion of the results, Kristine Wong for assistance with the analysis of Mecp2LucHyg ES clones, and the Research Pathology Lab of the Cancer Tissue and Pathology Shared Resources within the Winship Cancer Institute for assistance with immunohistochemistry, especially Dianne Alexis. We thank Jan Abkowitz, Joseph M. Ready, Huda Zoghbi and Sol Snyder for critical review of the manuscript.
Footnotes
Online Content: Methods and Extended Data display items are available in the online version of the paper; references unique to these sections appear only in the online paper.
Contributor Information
Peter Huppke, Email: phuppke@med.uni-goettingen.de.
Jeffrey Neul, Email: jneul@ucsd.edu.
Antonio Bedalov, Email: abedalov@fhcrc.org.
Andrew A. Pieper, Email: andrew-pieper@uiowa.edu.
References
- 1.Neul JL. The relationship of Rett syndrome and MECP2 disorders to autism. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2012;14:253–62. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2012.14.3/jneul. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Katz DM, et al. Preclinical research in Rett syndrome: setting the foundation for translational success. Dis Mod and Mech. 2012;5:733–745. doi: 10.1242/dmm.011007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Guy J, Hendrich B, Holmes M, Martin JE, Bird A. A mouse Mecp2-null mutation causes neurological symptoms that mimic Rett syndrome. Nature Genet. 2001;27:322–326. doi: 10.1038/85899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Derecki NC, et al. Wild-type microglia arrest pathology in a mouse model of Rett syndrome. Nature. 2012;18:105–9. doi: 10.1038/nature10907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.MT2013-31:Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Inherited Metabolic Disorders, Sever Osteoporosis and Males with Rett Syndrome Following Conditioning with Busulfan (Therapeutic Drug Monitoring), Fludarabine +/− ATG. University of Minnesota; Minneapolis, MN USA: [Google Scholar]
- 6.Landis SC, et al. A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research. Nature. 2012;490:187–91. doi: 10.1038/nature11556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yang Y, et al. Perivascular, but not parenchymal, cerebral engraftment of donor cells after non-myeloablative bone marrow transplantation. Exp Mol Pathol. 2013;95:7–17. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2013.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Brendel C, et al. Readthrough of nonsense mutations in Rett syndrome: evaluation of novel aminoglycosides and generation of a new mouse model. J Mol Med (Berl) 2011;89:389–398. doi: 10.1007/s00109-010-0704-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pitcher MR, et al. Insulinotropic treatments exacerbate metabolic syndrome in mice lacking MeCP2 function. Hum Mol Genet. 2013;22:2626–33. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddt111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Goldmann T, et al. A new type of microglia gene targeting shows TAK1 to be pivotal in CNS autoimmune inflammation. Nat Neurosci. 2013;11:1618–26. doi: 10.1038/nn.3531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sasmono RT, et al. A macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor-green fluorescent protein transgene is expressed throughout the mononuclear phagocyte system of the mouse. Blood. 2003;101:1155–63. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-02-0569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.