Skip to main content
Iranian Journal of Microbiology logoLink to Iranian Journal of Microbiology
. 2015 Aug;7(4):191–197.

Distribution of Shiga toxin genes subtypes in B1 phylotypes of Escherichia coli isolated from calves suffering from diarrhea in Tehran suburb using DNA oligonucleotide arrays

Hamid Staji 1,*, Alfreda Tonelli 2, Abbas Javaheri-Vayeghan 1, Emad Changizi 1, Mohammad Reza Salimi-Bejestani 1
PMCID: PMC4685162  PMID: 26697157

Abstract

Background and Objectives:

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) have emerged as human pathogens and contamination via animal origin has been a major public health concern. We compared the distribution of phylogenetic groups and prevalence of stx gene variants among the pathogenic strains of Escherichia coli isolated from feces of diarrheatic calves in Tehran suburb farms.

Materials and Methods:

In this study we screened 140 diarrheatic calves (1–15 days old) for E. coli strains during a 3 months period of time. The isolated strains were grouped into different phylotypes according to the presence of chuA, yjaA and TSPE4.C2 genes. Then, the prevalence of stx gene subtypes was evaluated in the B1 phylotypes.

Results:

From diarrheatic calves, 51 bacterial isolates were biochemically identified as E. coli and 31 isolates out of 51 were considered B1 phylotype using DNA Microarray technology. Of these isolates, 20 contained stx1a and stx1b and one harbored all mentioned variants of stx genes except stx2b2.

Conclusion:

This study showed that in Tehran suburb, the B1 phylotype of E. coli is prevalent as a causative agent of diarrhea in calves and the prevalence of stx1 gene subtypes is dominant in comparison with other subtypes. Considering the possibility that these stx genes can be spread to other strains, bovine E. coli strains are an important source of stx genes for other strains and further study and surveillance seems to be required for the exact identification of virulence profile of E. coli phylotypes in different hosts.

Keywords: Escherichia coli, calf diarrhea, B1 phylotype, shiga-like toxin subtypes, Tehran suburb

INTRODUCTION

Escherichia coli is one of the most important agents causing gastrointestinal tract infection in meat producing domestic animals, especially at the first weeks of life and ruminants are one of the reservoirs of Shiga like toxin producing E. coli (STEC), excreting this infectious agent in feces and environment(1). STEC is a public health threatening germ causing sporadic and outbreaks of human problems including diarrhea, hemorrhagic colitis and Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome (HUS) characterized by acute renal failure, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia. The ability of STEC to cause these severe complications is related to secretion of Verotoxins which are encoded by stx1 and stx2 genes (2). Direct contact to reservoirs or faecally contaminated foods or water resources are the main transmission routes of STEC to humans (3).

Shiga toxin 1 (stx1) and Shiga toxin 2 (stx2) are encoded on a lambdoid bacteriophage. stx1 is genetically and immunologically distinct from stx2, showing 55–60% genetic and amino acid identity. stx1 is very similar to the Shiga toxin stx found in Shigella dysenteriae type 1. Despite their similarities, stx1 and stx2 produce different degrees and types of tissue damage. Enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) that produce stx2 are more likely to cause hemolytic uremic syndrome than are stx1 producers (4).

E. coli strains according to the presence of chuA, yjaA and TspE4.C2 are phylogenetically divided into seven groups and subgroups (A0, A1, B1, B22, B23, D1, and D2) as follows: subgroup A0 (group A), lacking chuA, yjaA, and TSPE4.C2; subgroup A1 (group A), lacking chuA, having yjaA, and lacking TSPE4.C2; subgroup B22 (group B2), having chuA and yjaA and lacking TSPE4.C2; subgroup B23 (group B2), having chuA, yjaA, and TSPE4.C2; subgroup D1 (group D), having chuA and lacking yjaA and TSPE4.C2; and subgroup D2 (group D), having chuA, lacking yjaA, and having TSPE4.C2 (5).

It has been demonstrated that the majority of the E. coli strains that are able to persist in the environment belong to the B1 phylogenetic group (6). Thus, the aim of this study was to identify the prevalence of E. coli phylotypes in the cattle farms of Tehran suburbs and estimating their potential to keep the stx subtypes in environment as reservoirs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial isolation and identification.

Sampling and sample size determination were done according to the table described by Krejcie & Morgan (33). In summary, a total of 140 faecal samples, randomly, from 220 calves (1–15 days old) suffering from diarrhea were collected during January to March (2014) from 460 calves born in dairy herds kept in south east of Tehran as an important region for dairy herds production and E. coli isolation was performed according to the protocol described by Alonso et al. (7). Genomic DNA was extracted from isolated strains with the Accu Prep Genomic DNA extraction kit (BIONEER, Korea) according to the manufacturer's protocol (3).

DNA Labelling.

Purified genomic DNA was quantified using a Nanodrop Spectrophotometer (Nanodrop Technologies, Thermo Scientific, USA). Approximately 300 ng of DNA was subjected to fluorescent labelling using the Bioprime DNA labelling system (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Burlington, Canada). Labelling efficiency and the percentage of dye incorporation was then determined by scanning the DNA sample in the Nanodrop spectrophotometer from 200 to 700 nm. Cy3 dye incorporation was calculated using a webbased percent incorporation calculator (available on web page http://www.pan-gloss.com/seidel/Protocols/percent_inc.html).

Shiga like toxin oligonucleotide microarray.

The E. coli microarray (maxi-virulence) used in this study was designed and produced by NRC Biotechnology Research Institute (NRC-BRI) and Groupe de Recherchesur le Maladies Infectieuses du Porc (GREMIP). The microarray version used, originally developed by Bruantet al.(8), was composed of 70-mer oligonucleotide probes targeting 264 virulence or virulence-related genes covering all known E. coli pathotypes including stx probes (Table 1).

Table 1.

The sequence of 70-mer stx gene and phylogenetic marker probes used in the slide array for detection of stx subtypes and phylogenetic groups.

Probe ID. Oligonucleotide sequence (5→3) Accession no.
chuA TTG GCA AGG TGG CAG AAA CAG CTA AGG CCA ATA AAC TCA
AAC GCA ACG AGG TAA ATT GCG GAC GTG ACA T
U67920
yjaA GAT TAC GAC GAA TTT GGA TAT ACA GAA CTG ACA TGA GAT
TCC CTT CAT CAT GCA AAT AAT TGA TAT GCA A
AE016770
TSPE4.C2 CTA TCG AAC TTG AAG GGA TGA CCT TAC GAA TAG TGT CAC
CGC TGA ATG CCC CGA CAT TAC TCC CGA CGA T
AF222188
stx1A CAT CCC CGT ACG ACT GAT CCC TGC AAC ACG CTG TAA CGT
GGT ATA GCT ACT GTC ACC AGA CAA TGT AAC C
AF461168
stx1B TCA TCC CCG TAA TTT GCG CAC TGA GAA GAA GAG ACT GAA
GAT TCC ATC TGT TGG TAA ATA ATT CTT TAT C
AF461168
stx2A GTA TTA CCA CTG AAC TCC ATT AAC GCC AGA TAT GAT GAA
ACC AGT GAG TGA CGA CTG ATT TGC ATT CCG G
X65949
stx2B-1 AAA TCC GGA GCC TGA TTC ACA GGT ACT GGA TTT GAT TGT
GAC AGT CAT TCC TGT CAA CTG AGC ACT TTG C
AE005174
stx2B-2 AAA TCC TGA ACC TGA CGC ACA GGT ATT TGA TTT GAT TGT
TAC CGT CAT TCC TGT TAA CTG TGC GCT TTG C
X65949

Hybridizations and data acquisition.

For each hybridization 500 ng of labelled DNA was dried under vacuum in a rotary desiccator without heating (Savant Speed Vac, ArrayIt, USA). Dried labelled DNA was re-suspended in hybridization buffer (DIG Easy Hyb Buffer, Roche Diagnostics, Laval, Canada). Microarrays were pre-hybridized for at least one hour at 50°C with a pre-heated pre-hybridization buffer containing 59 SSC, 0.1% SDS and 1.0% BSA. After pre-hybridization, the microarrays were hybridized with a solution that consisted of 25 μl of hybridization buffer, 20 μl of Bakers Yeast tRNA (10 mg/ml) (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) and 20 μl of sonicated Salmon Sperm DNA (10 mg/ml) (Sigma Aldrich), mixed together with the labelled DNA which had previously been denatured. Microarrays were hybridized overnight at 50°C in a SlideBooster (model SB800; Advalytix, Germany). After hybridization, stringency washes were performed with Advawash (Advalytix) using 19 SSC, 0.02% SDS preheated to 50°C. Microarray slides were scanned with a Scan Array Lite fluorescent microarray analysis system (Perkin-Elmer, Mississauga, Canada) using with Scan Array Gx software (Perkin-Elmer, Foster City, USA). Fluorescent spot intensities were quantified with Quant Array Version 3.0 (Packard Bioscience, Boston, USA). All the microarrays were normalized using the same method. For each sub array, the mean value for each set of duplicate spotted oligonucleotides was divided by the correction factor taken from the negative controls spots. This value was then divided by the average of the empty spots to create a signal-to-noise ratio. Oligonucleotide spots with a signal-to-noise fluorescence ratio greater than the established threshold (3 in this case), were considered positive. These ratios were then converted into binary data where a value of 0 indicates a negative probe and a value of 1 a positive probe. A threshold of 3 was chosen because it best represented spot quantification. At least three arrays were hybridized to each strain and the six technical replicate points (two per array) were pooled. At least five probes of the six gene probes had to be positive before a positive score was considered.

RESULTS

According to the biochemical procedure described by Alonso et al. (7), 51 bacterial isolates were identified as pathogenic E. coli from 140 fecal samples.

The 51 E. coli strains were phylogenetically grouped based on the presence of chuA, yjaA and TSPE4.C2 markers and results demonstrated the distribution of phylotypes in our samples as follow: B1 (60.78%), D1 (15.68%), A0 (9.8%), B23(5.88%), A1 (3.9%), B22 (1.9%) and D2 (1.9%) and B1 phylotype was the most distributed group in our study existing in farms of defined area, causing calf diarrhea. The detection of stx gene subtypes in B1 phylotype, showed that from thirty one B1 strains, ten (32.2%) strains did not have any stx subtypes and twenty one (67.8%) strains harbored at least one subtypes of stx toxin genes as follow: twenty (64.5%) with two subtypes (stx1A+stx1B), one (3.3%) strain with four subtypes (stx1A+stx1B+stx2A+stx2b1) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Distribution of phylogenetic groups (FG) among E. coli strains from calves with diarrhea and frequency of stx subtypes genes in B1 isolates.

Phylogenetic Groups No.strains (%) stx subtype genes (% of stx genes in B1 FG)

stx1A+stx1B stx1A+stx1B+stx2A+stx2b1 without stx gene

B1 31 (60.78%) 20 strains (64.5%) 1 strain (3.3%) 10 strains (32.2%)

D1 8 (15.68%)
A0 5 (9.8%)
B23 3 (5.88%)
A1 2 (3.9%)
B22 1 (1.9%)
D2 1 (1.9%)
Total 51 (100%)

DISCUSSION

Escherichia coli is an important infectious agent in calves less than 2 month old (9). E. coli strains according to the presence of chuA, yjaA and TSPE4.C2 are phylogenetically divided into seven groups and subgroups (A0, A1, B1, B22, B23, D1, and D2). To increase the discrimination power of E. coli population analyses, it has been proposed the use of subgroups that are determined by the combination of the genetic markers (10). Some authors analyzed the distribution of the main phylogenetic groups among E. coli strains isolated from human and animal feces. Gordon and Cowling (2003) observed that the relative abundance of phylogenetic groups among mammals is dependent on the host diet, body mass and climate (11). Escobar-Páramo et al. (2006) analyzing fecal strains isolated from birds, non-human mammals and humans, observed the prevalence of groups D and B1 in birds, A and B1 in non-human mammals, and A and B2 in humans (10). These authors concluded that one of the main forces that shape the genetic structure of E. coli populations among the hosts is domestication. Baldy-Chudzik et al. (2008) analyzed feces from zoo animals and found a prevalence of group B1 in herbivorous animals and a prevalence of group A in carnivorous and omnivorous animals (12). In this work we described the distribution of different E. coli phylotypes in some cattle farms of Tehran region and we found that B1 phylogroup is the most phylotype causing diarrhea in newborn calves. According to the observation that STEC is quite prevalent in cattle as well has been reported by Pradel et al. (2000) and Kobayashi et al. (2001), who found 70 and 100% of cattle stx positive in their respective studies (13, 14). We monitored the presence of different stx gene subtypes in the members of B1 phylogroup and the main result is that stx1 subtypes are the most prevalent in isolated strains and only one strain carrying stx1 and stx2 subtypes. Carlos et al. (2010) indicated that distribution of phylogroup genetic markers amongst the E. coli strains associated with mammals are not randomly distributed presenting an average of 96% overlapping and similarity (6). Apajalahti (2005) showed that cows, goats and sheep as ruminant mammals differ from other animals for many gut characteristics and the diet. It has been reviewed that these factors affect phylogroup profile of mammals and it has also been shown that B1 phylogroup is the most prevalent group in herbivorous mammals while the omnivorous animals presented the phylogroup A, dominantly (15). Ggeographic factors was previously reported to affect the E. coli population structure among hosts (6). Although we found B1 phylotype as the most prevalent group causing diarrhea in newborn calves in Tehran suburb and it is parallel with the results obtained with Apajalahti (15), other investigators reported phylogroup B2 strains among herbivorous and omnivorous mammals, but found B1 phylogroup among birds and carnivorous mammals (11). Salehi and Ghanbarpour (2010) did a phylogroup profiling in E. coli strains from Japanese quail demonstrating that 50 percent of isolates belong to phylogroup A, the remainders belonged to B1, B2 and D groups subsequently (16). Their result is similar to finding of Gordon and Cowling (2003) (11).

There is no data available about the frequency of stx2 and stx1 in animal and people in close contact to HUS patients in Iran. The greater observation of the stx2 gene relative to the stx1 gene in strain populations indicates a risk alert of this gene between these populations. Some studies have revealed that strains possessing only stx2 are potentially more virulent than strains harboring stx1 or even strains carrying both stx1 and stx2 (17,18). It is of note that most HUS-associated clinically relevant STEC isolates produce stx2, but at least in Europe, rarely, stx1 is highly relevant (17). Stx2 has been found to be approximately 400 times more toxic (as quantified by LD50 in mice) than Stx1 (17, 23). The gene belonging to strains detected from animals showed more expression of protein toxin than human samples (18). Hence the strains of animal origin maintain the characteristic and are more cytotoxic than the gene from human origin (22). This supports the suggestion of Tahamtan et al. (2010) that cattle may have been the source of the organism for the HUS patients (23).

Walk et al. (2007) demonstrated that the majority of the E. coli strains that are able to persist in the environment belong to the B1 phylogenetic group (5). Our data revealed high levels of stx1 gene-carrying bacteria in fecal samples from different cattle. STEC strains among the B1 group harboring stx1 was isolated more (64.5%) than STEC stx2(3.3%). Zahraee Salehiet al. (2006) identified STEC O157 among 7 isolates (11.5%), from cattle, whereas non-O157 strains that are frequently associated with sporadic cases of HUS (24, 25), were isolated from 4 (6%) of animals. They showed 5 (8.2%) isolates carried stx genes (25). This finding was in parallel with the results of Jomezadeh et al. (2008) that showed the presence of stx1 in 35.5 and stx2 in 49.1% of human isolates (27). This is in contrast with Sepehriseresht et al. (2008) finding with a report of stx1 and stx2, among 5% and 1.9% of calves respectively (28). Zahraei Salehi et al. and Mazhaheri Nejad Fard et al. (2005), reported that prevalence of STEC strains in calves with diarrhea in Tehran, was 68.8% (13.7% of isolates were stx1+ and 55.1% carrying stx2 gene) and 21.8%, respectively (24, 29). In another report, STEC strains were diagnosed in 20.9% of E. coli strains from calves with diarrhea in Urmia, West Azerbayejan province (30) while other studies show the prevalence of STEC strains within E. coli isolates from calves suffering from diarrhea 26%, 27%, 17.8% and 2.7% in Charmahal, Fars, Khozestan and Isfahan province, respectively (31), while our findings showed that 14.3% of tested calves carrying stx1 positive strains and less than one percent stx2 harboring strains. Our finding is approximately similar to results obtained by Zahraei Salehi et al. (32). This may be as a result of geographical conditions, the presence of natural antibodies and differences in the natural intestinal flora present in humans and animals.

In conclusion, there is no data available about distribution of E. coli phylotypes and distribution of stx genes within these phylotypes in different regions of Iran. Keeping in mind the members of B1 phylotype as commensally bacteria and circulation of stx genes between them as virulence factors and their ability to transmit these factors vertically and horizontally, more work and comprehensive diagnosis of E. coli phylotypes in different hosts and their virulence factors as in detailed epidemiological data, seems to be necessary.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Djordjevic SP, Hornitzky MA, Bailey G, Gill P, Vanselow B, Walker K, et al. Virulence properties and serotypes of Shiga toxin producing Escherichia coli from healthy Australian slaughter-age sheep. J Clin Microbiol 2001; 39: 2017– 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Kobayashi H, Shimada J, Nakazawa M, Morozumi T, Pohjanvitra T, Pelkonnen S, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli from healthy cattle in Japan. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001; 67: 484– 489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Zahraei Salehi T, Tonelli A, Mazza A, Staji H, Badagliacca P, AshrafiTamai I, et al. Genetic characterization of Escherichia coli O157:H7 atrains isolated from the one-humped camel (Camelus dromedarius) by using microarray DNA technology. Mol Biotechnol 2012; 51: 283– 288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Lee JE, Reed J, Shields MS, Spiegel KM, Farrell LD, Sheridan PP. Phylogenetic analysis of Shiga toxin 1 and Shiga toxin 2 genes associated with disease outbreaks. BMC Microbiology 2007; 7: 109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Gordon D, Clermont O, Tolley H, Denamur E. Assigning Escherichia coli strains to phylogenetic groups: multi-locus sequence typing versus the PCR triplex method. Environ Microbiol 2008; 10: 2484– 2496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Carlos C, Pires MM, Stoppe NC, Hachich EM, IZ Sato M, Gomes TAT. Escherichia coli phylogenetic group determination and its application in the identification of the major animal source of fecal contamination. BMC Microbiology 2010; 10: 161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Alonso JL, Soriano A, Carbajo O, Amoros I, Garelick H. Comparison and recovery of Escherichia coli and thermotolerant coliforms in water with a chromogenic medium incubated at 41 and 44.5 C. Appl and Environ Microbiol 1999; 65: 3746– 3749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Bruant G, Maynard C, Bekal S, Gaucher I, Masson L, Brousseau R, et al. Development and validation of an oligonucleotide microarray for detection of multiple virulence and antimicrobial resistance genes in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiology 2006; 72: 3780– 3784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Acha SJ, Kuhn I, Johnsson P, Mbazima G, Katouli M, Mollby R. Studies on calf diarrhea in Mozambique: Prevalence of bacterial pathogens. Acta Vet Scand 2004; 45: 27– 36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Escobar-Páramo P, Le Menac'h A, Le Gall T, Amorin C, Gouriou S, Picard B. Identification of forces shaping the commensal Escherichia coli genetic structure by comparing animal and human isolates. Environ Microbiol 2006; 8: 1975 1984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Gordon DM, Cowling A. The distribution and genetic structure of Escherichia coli in Australian vertebrates: host and geographic effects. Microbiology 2003; 149: 3575– 3586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Baldy-Chudzik K, Mackiewics P, Stosik Phylogenetic background, virulence gene profiles, and genomic diversity in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from ten mammal species living in one zoo. Vet Microbiol 2008; 131: 173– 184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Pradel N, Livrelli V, De Champs C, Palcoux JB, Reynaud A, Scheutz F, et al. Prevalence and characterization of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from cattle, food, and children during a one-year prospective study in France. Clin Microbiol 2000; 38: 1023– 1031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Kobayashi H, Shimada J, Nakazawa M, Morozumi T, Pohjanvirta T, Pelkonen S, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli from healthy cattle in Japan. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001; 67: 484 489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Apajalahti j. Comparative gut microflora, metabolic challenges, and potential opportunities. J ApplPoult Res 2005; 14: 444– 453. [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Salehi M, Ghanbarpour R. Phenotypic and genotypic properties of Escherichia coli isolated from colisepticemic cases of Japanese quail. Trop Anim Health Prod 2010; DOI 10.1007/s11250-010-9583-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. llingsona JLE, Koziczkowskia JJ, Andersona JL, Carl.sonb SA, Sharmab VK. Rapid PCR detection of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) in bovine food products and feces. Mol Cell Probes 2005; 19: 213– 217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Nataro JP, Kaper JB. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Rev 1998; 11: 142– 201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Ludwig K, Sarkim V, Bitzan M, Karmali MA, Bobrowski C, Ruder H, et al. Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli infection and anti-bodies against Stx2 and Stx1 in household contacts of children with enteropathogenic hemolytic-uremic syndrome. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40: 12– 17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Riley LW, Remis RS, Helgerson SD, McGee HB, Wells JG, Davis BR, et al. Hemorrhagic colitis associated with a rare Escherichia coli serotype. New Eng J Med 1983; 308: 681– 685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Keen EJ, Elder RO. Isolation of Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli O157 from hide surface and the oral cavity of finished beef feedlot cattle. JAMA 2002; 220: 756– 763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Ludwig K, Karmali MA, Sarkim V, Bobrowski C, Petric M, Karch H, et al. Antibody response to Shiga toxins Stx2 and Stx1 in children with enteropathic hemolytic-uremic syndrome. J Clin Microbiol 2001; 39: 2272– 2279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Tahamtan Y, Hayati M, Namavari MM. Prevalence and distribution of the stx1, stx2 genes in Shiga toxin producing E. coli (STEC) isolates from cattle. Iran J Microbiol 2010; 2: 8– 13. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Zahraei Salehi T, Mahzounieh M, Asadian F, Khosravi M. Virulence genes in Escherichia coli isolates from calves in shahrekord area, Iran. 16th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Disease, Nice, France 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Rahimi E, Momtaz H, Hemmatzadeh F. The prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes and Campylobacter spp. on bovine carcasses in Isfahan, Iran. Iran J Vet Res 2008; 9: 365– 370. [Google Scholar]
  • 26. De Sablet T, Bertin Y, Vareille M, Girardeau JP, Garrivier A, Gobert AP, et al. Differential expression of stx2 variants in Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli belonging to seropathotypes A and C. Microbiol 2008;154: 176– 186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Jomezadeh N, Farajzadeh Sheikh A, Khosravi AD, Amin M. Detection of Shiga toxin producing E. coli strains isolated from stool samples of patients with Diarrhea in Abadan Hospitals. Iran J Biolog Sci 2009; 9: 820– 824. [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Sepehriseresht S, Zahraei Salehi T, Sattari M, Tadjbakhsh H, Aslani MM. Detection of shigatoxigenic Escherichia coli from fecal samples of calves and cattle by molecular and serological methods. Comparat-Clin Pathol 2008; 3: 12– 17. [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Mazhaherinejadfard R, Behzadiannezhad G, ZahraeiSalehi T, Atashparvar N. Evaluation of ehxA, stx1, and stx2 virulence gene prevalence in cattle Escherichia Coli isolates by multiplex PCR. Arch RaziIns 2005; 60: 55 66. [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Dastmalchi Saei H, Ayremlou N. Characterization of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) in feces of healthy and diarrheic calves in Urmia region, Iran. Iran J Microbiol 2012; 4: 63– 69. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Shahrani M, Safarpoor Dehkordi F, Momtaz H. Characterization of Escherichia coli virulence genes, pathotypes and antibiotic resistance properties in diarrheic calves in Iran. Biological Research 2014; 47: 28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Yaghobzadeh N, Ownagh A, Mardani K, Khalili M. Prevalence, molecular characterization and serology of Shiga toxin producing Escherichia coli isolated from buffaloes in West Azerbaijan, Iran. Int J Vet Res 2011; 2: 113– 117. [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Krejcie RV, Morgan DW. Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1970; 30: 607– 610. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES