Skip to main content
AoB Plants logoLink to AoB Plants
. 2015 Nov 17;7:plv131. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plv131

Root aeration improves growth and nitrogen accumulation in rice seedlings under low nitrogen

Jingwen Zhu 1,2, Jing Liang 1,2, Zhihui Xu 2, Xiaorong Fan 1,2,*, Quansuo Zhou 2, Qirong Shen 2, Guohua Xu 1,2
PMCID: PMC4685170  PMID: 26578743

As rice adapts to waterlogged conditions it develops aerenchyma to transport O2 from shoots to roots and leaches O2 into the rhizosphere to balance the soil redox potential for rice root growth and the growth of bacteria such as ammonium oxidation bacteria, which can convert ammonium into nitrate and influence the total N uptake by rice roots. We showed that rice cultivars differ in aerenchyma development, nitrogen uptake and gene response to external aeration treatment. Interestingly, we found that the effect of nitrogen on rice plant growth depends on environmental O2 level.

Keywords: Aerenchyma formation, ethylene, gene expression, nitrogen, Oryza sativa, oxygen

Abstract

In wetland soils, changes in oxygen (O2) level in the rhizosphere are believed to influence the behaviour of nutrients and their usage by plants. However, the effect of aeration on nitrogen (N) acquisition under different N supply conditions remains largely unknown. In this study, the rice cultivars Yangdao 6 (YD6, with higher root aerenchyma abundance) and Nongken 57 (NK57, with lower root aerenchyma abundance) were used to evaluate the effects of aeration on rice growth and N accumulation. Our results showed that the number of adventitious roots and the root surface area increased significantly, and ethylene production and aerenchyma formation decreased in both cultivars after external aeration (EA). Five N treatments, including no N (−N), 0.125 mM NH4NO3 (LN), 1.25 mM Ca(NO3)2 (NO3-N), 1.25 mM (NH4)2SO4 (NH4-N) and 1.25 mM NH4NO3 (N/N), were applied to YD6 and NK57 for 2 days under internal aeration or EA conditions. External aeration increased the root biomass in both cultivars and the shoot biomass in NK57 by 18–50 %. The total N concentrations in roots of YD6 grown under −N and LN and of NK57 grown under NO3-N were increased by EA. Expression of OsPAD4, one of four putative genes regulating aerenchyma formation, showed a similar pattern alongside changes in the ethylene level in the EA-treated rice irrespective of the N treatments. Furthermore, expression of the high-affinity nitrate transporter gene OsNRT2.1 was increased by EA under −N, LN and NO3-N conditions. Our data provide evidence of an interaction between O2 and the supply of N in ethylene production, aerenchyma formation and N nutrition through modification of the expression of OsPAD4 and OsNRT2.1.

Introduction

Wetland plants commonly grow under alternating drought and flood conditions (Alberda 1953; Colmer 2003a; Qian et al. 2004; Nishiuchi et al. 2012). They can develop aerenchyma—gas-filled interconnected spaces or lacunae in the roots, stems and leaves—to adapt to low dissolved oxygen (O2) levels during waterlogging (Arenovski and Howes 1992; Colmer et al. 1998; Armstrong and Armstrong 2005; Steffens et al. 2011). Oxygen, ethylene and methane can be transported from the shoots to the roots via the aerenchyma and released into the rhizosphere (Armstrong 1979; Jackson and Armstrong 1999; Colmer 2003b; Teal and Kanwisher 1966; Yu et al. 1997). This leads to variable dissolved O2 levels at wetland plant root surfaces in paddy fields. Oxygen directly or indirectly affects nitrification dominated by nitrifying bacteria, or chemical oxidation for the conversion of NH4+ to NO3 at the root surface, as well as the form of nitrogen (N) taken up by wetland plants (Kludze et al. 1993; Li et al. 2008). Oxygen levels and rate of nitrification in the paddy rhizosphere can also affect total N usage by wetland plants (Li et al. 2008; Xu et al. 2012a).

Aerenchyma form in the parenchyma as a result of programmed cell death (PCD) and extend from below the ground up through the stems and leaves (Drew et al. 2000). Formation of aerenchyma is affected by external ethylene but to different extents among different cultivars (Justin and Armstrong 1991; Kong et al. 2009). In plant roots, external ethylene can inhibit root elongation (Visser and Pierik 2007) and aerenchyma formation (Takahashi et al. 2015). In Arabidopsis, the formation of lysigenous aerenchyma as a result of PCD is dependent on the plant defence regulators AtLSD1, AtEDS1 and AtPAD4 (Mühlenbock et al. 2007). These genes influence PCD by operating upstream of ethylene production and reactive oxygen species in the roots (Mühlenbock et al. 2007). Expression of PAD4 was shown to be strongly associated with ethylene concentrations in Arabidopsis (Durrant and Dong 2004; Lei et al. 2014) and rice (Qiu et al. 2007; Ding et al. 2008). In rice, a gene related to disease resistance, OsBphi008a, was located downstream of the ethylene signalling pathway and was a positive indicator of ethylene levels (Yuan et al. 2004; Hu et al. 2011), and overexpression of OsPDCD5 induced PCD in transgenic lines (Su et al. 2006). In addition, OsLSD1.1, OsLSD2, OsPAD4 and OsEDS in rice, which are homologous to the Arabidopsis AtLSD1, AtPAD4 and AtEDS1 genes, respectively, may also play similar roles during aerenchyma formation via PCD in the roots.

Although ammonium (NH4+) is the primary form of available N in flooded fields, and rice prefers NH4+ over NO3 (Wang et al. 1993), physiological studies have shown that lowland rice is exceptionally efficient at acquiring NO3 through nitrification in the rhizosphere (Li et al. 2006; Duan et al. 2007). A mixed supply of NH4+ and NO3 to both upland and lowland rice cultivars resulted in significant increases in the dry weight and grain yield compared with application of either NH4+ or NO3 as the sole N source (Qian et al. 2004; Duan et al. 2007). In rice, a number of ammonium transporter genes (Sonoda et al. 2003; Zhao et al. 2014) and nitrate transporter genes (Feng et al. 2011; Xu et al. 2012b) have been functionally characterized. The ammonium transporter genes OsAMT1.1, OsAMT1.2 and OsAMT1.3 exhibited ammonium transport activity in yeast (Sonoda et al. 2003) and OsAMT1.1 contributed more than did the other two genes to N accumulation (Zhao et al. 2014). Knockdown of OsNAR2.1, which encodes a partner protein of the NRT2 transporter, decreased the total N accumulation by ∼63–66 % (Yan et al. 2011). OsNRT2.3a plays a key role in long-distance NO3 transport from the roots to shoots in rice under low NO3 conditions (Tang et al. 2012). Physiological studies on the relationship between N and the aerenchyma in rice have shown that the aerenchyma can influence N absorption and utilization (Yoshida and Ancajas 1973; Gebauer et al. 1996; Li et al. 2008). In addition, the different forms of N could also affect aerenchyma formation. The NO3 treatment yielded a significantly greater increase in root porosity than did NH4+ treatment (Yang et al. 2012), and N deficiency induced aerenchyma formation in the roots of maize (Drew et al. 1989; He et al. 1994) and rice (He et al. 1992).

Although the physiological effects of N treatments on aerenchyma formation have been investigated in plants, limited information is available on the underlying molecular mechanisms. In previous research, we characterized two rice cultivars with high (Yangdao 6, YD6) and low (Nongken 57, NK57) N use efficiency (NUE), exhibiting different ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and nitrification activities in the root rhizosphere (Li et al. 2008). We reported the effects of root aeration on root aerenchyma formation, N accumulation and the expression of aerenchyma-formation-related and N transporter genes in both cultivars under diverse N conditions after internal aeration (IA) and external aeration (EA) treatments. These results provided evidence for the relationship between aerenchyma formation and N nutrition at the gene expression level in rice.

Methods

Aeration treatments

Seeds of the YD6 and NK57 rice cultivars were surface sterilized with 30 % (v : v) NaClO (5.2 % available chlorine) for 30 min and then rinsed thoroughly five or six times with water. The sterilized seeds were distributed uniformly on plastic mesh grates with 1-mm2 holes and placed in darkness for 2.5 days. The germinated seeds were divided equally into two groups for IA and EA treatments. Plastic grates containing germinated seeds for each group were placed on plastic buckets 30 cm in height and 25 cm in diameter. For the EA group, air was pumped continuously into the water in the bucket using an air pump. For seedlings in the IA group, air was not pumped into the water. The dissolved O2 level with IA and EA treatments was detected with a portable dissolved O2 detector (JPB-607, Leici Company, Shanghai, China) and recorded continuously during the 8 days of all experiments. Both groups of rice plants were placed in a growth chamber with a 16-h/8-h light/dark cycle and 30 °C/26 °C day/night temperature cycle. Relative humidity was maintained at 60 %. After 5 days of IA or EA treatment, the numbers of adventitious roots were counted and total root lengths and root surface areas were determined (scanned and analysed) using the WinRhizoV4.0b image analysis software (Regent Instruments, Canada). Root tips were collected for aerenchyma measurements and total root systems grown under the two aeration treatments were harvested 2 h into the light phase of the daily light cycle for analysis of OsPAD4 (AK243523), OsLSD1.1 (AK111759), OsBphi008a (NM_001048814), OsPDCD5 (AY749430), OsNRT2.1 (AB008519), OsNAR2.1 (AP004023), OsNRT2.3 (AK109776), OsAMT1.1 (AF289477), OsAMT1.2 (AF289479) and OsAMT1.3 (AF289478) expression using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The shoots and roots of rice seedlings were separately collected for measuring biomass and total N. The samples were desiccated in a forced-air oven at 70 °C for ∼72 h to a constant weight, after which their dry weight was measured. The measurement of total N contents was performed according to Cai et al. (2012).

Determination and quantification of aerenchyma formation

After IA and EA treatments, roots with lengths of 5–8 cm were selected for aerenchyma measurements. Root tissue was prepared as described previously (Ai et al. 2009) with minor modifications for the use of Spon812 embedding resin (SPI, USA) according to the manufacturer's specifications. Excised root segments were 1–1.5 cm (where aerenchyma development begins) or 2–2.5 cm (where aerenchyma development is completed) from the root tip. The sections were observed under a microscope (DM 5000 B, Leica, Germany), and aerenchyma formation was calculated from section images using ImageJ software.

Nitrogen treatments

Rice seedlings of identical height cultivated under IA and EA conditions for 5 days were selected for N treatments for a further 2 days. Seedlings were divided into five groups for treatment under different N conditions. The seedlings were grown in tanks containing 10 L of nutrient solution. The five N treatments were listed as no N (−N), 0.125 mM NH4NO3 (LN), 1.25 mM Ca(NO3)2 (NO3-N), 1.25 mM (NH4)2SO4 (NH4-N) and 1.25 mM NH4NO3 (N/N). To inhibit nitrification, 7 µM dicyandiamide (DCD-C2H4N4) was added to the nutrient solutions. Whole roots were collected after 0.5, 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h of growth in the nutrient solutions to analyse gene expression. Shoots and roots of rice seedlings were, respectively, collected 48 h later to measure biomass and total N concentration. Plant samples were desiccated in a forced-air oven at 70 °C for ∼72 h to a constant weight, after which their dry weight was measured. The measurement of total N contents was performed according to Cai et al. (2012).

Quantification of ethylene production from rice

The ethylene levels of five seedlings of the two rice varieties were determined after aeration and N treatments. Seedlings were transferred into 10 mL gas chromatography (GC) vials (B7990-6A, National Scientific Company, Rockwood, TN, USA). We then added 4 mL of the same N solution as used for the N treatments into IA group vials or waterman filter paper soaked with same N solutions into EA group vials and collected ethylene released from the seedlings for 12 h. The 6 mL total air in these vials was introduced into 50 mL syringes and subjected to GC analysis (GC7890, Agilent Company, Palo Alto, CA, USA) as described previously (Xu et al. 2008). Three replicates were used for the data pool.

Quantitative real-time PCR

Total RNA was prepared from the roots of YD6 and NK57 seedlings using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen; http://www.invitrogen.com). For quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis, total RNAs were treated with DNaseI and reverse transcribed using SuperScript II (Invitrogen) to produce cDNA. Triplicate quantitative assays were performed on each cDNA dilution using SYBR Green Master Mix and an ABI 7000 sequence detection system according to the manufacturer's protocol (Applied Biosystems, http://www.takara.com). Gene-specific primers were designed using the Primer Express software (Applied Biosystems). The relative quantification method was used to evaluate the quantitative variation between replicates. Amplification of OsRAc1 (Actin) was used as an internal standard to normalize all expression data. All primers used for qPCR are listed in Supporting Information—Table S1.

Statistical analysis

All statistical evaluations were conducted using IBM SPSS ver. 13 software. To determine whether dissolved O2 in response to EA was changed during 192 h, a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with aeration and time course as two main effects was used. One of the aims of the experiment was to investigate the nature of the aeration responses in rice plant. We measured adventitious root number, root surface area, aerenchyma formation, ethylene production and the expression of aerenchyma-formation- and N-related genes by aeration treatment of each cultivar individually. These data except gene expression were compared with the differences between cultivars under aeration treatment with two-way repeated-measures ANOVA. For the gene expression of each cultivar, one-way ANOVA was used to test significance of data difference. In order to study the interaction between aeration and N treatment on rice response, we used a full model factorial experiment ANOVA to test for main and interactive effects of cultivar, aeration and N treatments on rice dry weight, total N concentration and ethylene production. Furthermore, we investigated the influence of aeration during treatment time course on aerenchyma-formation- and N-usage-related gene expression in two rice varieties under LN and NO3-N conditions. The significant differences of gene expression over aeration time under different N conditions were determined by the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).

Results

External aeration treatment increased root growth, and altered root aerenchyma formation and ethylene production under different N conditions

To examine the effect of the dissolved O2 level on root growth, we quantified changes in the dissolved O2 level of the rice-growing solutions after EA. Under IA conditions, the dissolved O2 decreased from 4.3 to 3.8 mg L−1 by 48 h and stabilized at 3.6 mg L−1 after 120 h of growth (Fig. 1). Under EA conditions, the dissolved O2 increased from 4.8 to 6.8 mg L−1 by 48 h and reached 7.8 mg L−1 by 120 h (Fig. 1). Both IA and EA significantly affected the dissolved O2 in the solution (Table 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The dissolved O2 level in the solutions under IA and EA conditions. Measurements were continuous for 8 days in all experiments. IA, internal aeration (filled circles); EA, external aeration (open circles). The period between the two dashed lines indicates the time of N treatment. Significant differences relative to the dissolved O2 level at 0 h are indicated by asterisks (P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA).

Table 1.

Results from a two-way ANOVA evaluating the influence of aeration and duration on dissolved O2 content.

Source df Mean2 F P
Aeration 1 302.419 3121.742 <0.0001
Duration 11 0.920 9.500 <0.0001
Aeration × duration 11 5.314 54.856 <0.0001
Error 96

The N treatments were started after 120 h when the dissolved O2 levels were stable. EA improved rice growth under different N supply conditions (Fig. 2A and B). Under conditions lacking N, both cultivars showed significant increases in the number of adventitious roots and root surface area (Fig. 2C and D) in response to EA treatment. While the number of adventitious roots showed significant higher in NK57 than YD6 at the same aeration condition (Fig. 2C and Table 2A), and the surface area had no significant difference (Fig. 2D and Table 2B) between cultivars. The shoot dry weight increased significantly in NK57, but not in YD6, after EA treatment (Table 3). In the treatments using different N supplies, EA treatment increased the shoot biomass by 15–40 % in NK57 and the root biomass by 20–50 % in both cultivars (Table 3). The results from a full model factorial experiment ANOVA of dry weight (Table 2) showed significant differences between cultivars, between aeration treatments and among N treatments (Table 4A). Furthermore, significant interactions were noted between cultivars and aeration, between aeration and N treatments, and between all three factors according to plant dry weight (Table 4A).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Rice growth, aerenchyma formation in root and ethylene production under IA and EA conditions. (A and B) Shoot and root phenotypes in seedlings of the YD6 (A) and NK57 (B) rice cultivars germinated and grown hydroponically in water for 5 days with IA or EA treatments. (C and D) Quantification of phenotypes. Numbers of adventitious roots (C) and root surface areas (D) were determined. (E and F) Partial aerenchyma formation visualized in sections of YD6 and NK57 roots. Resin-embedded sections obtained 1.5 cm (E) and 2.5 cm (F) from the root tips of YD6 and NK57 seedlings subjected to IA and EA treatments. (G and H) Quantification of aerenchyma formation in sections obtained 1.5 cm (G) and 2.5 cm (H) from the root tips, using Image J software. (I) Ethylene production in YD6 and NK57. Values represent the means ± SE (error bars) of three replicates. Significant differences are indicated by different letters (P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA).

Table 2.

Results from a two-way ANOVA evaluating the influence of aeration on adventitious root number, root surface area, aerenchyma formation and ethylene production of different rice seedlings.

Source df Mean2 F P
(A) Adventitious root number
 Cultivar 1 14.450 34.000 <0.0001
 Aeration 1 26.450 62.235 <0.0001
 Cultivar × aeration 1 1.250 2.941 0.106
 Error 16
(B) Root surface area
 Cultivar 1 0.302 0.580 0.454
 Aeration 1 48.245 92.773 <0.0001
 Cultivar × aeration 1 0.333 0.641 0.432
 Error 16
(C) Aerenchyma formation (1.5 cm)
 Cultivar 1 12.592 8.885 0.018
 Aeration 1 816.049 575.829 <0.0001
 Cultivar × aeration 1 1.682 1.187 0.308
 Error 8
(D) Aerenchyma formation (2.5 cm)
 Cultivar 1 356.430 167.600 <0.0001
 Aeration 1 125.453 58.991 <0.0001
 Cultivar × aeration 1 11.213 5.273 0.051
 Error 8
(E) Ethylene production
 Cultivar 1 0.038 27.862 0.001
 Aeration 1 0.191 140.355 <0.0001
 Cultivar × aeration 1 0.001 0.674 0.435
 Error 8

Table 3.

Dry weights and total N of rice seedlings with different N supplies under IA and EA conditions. Seedlings were sampled under IA and EA conditions, with −N, LN, NO3-N, NH4-N and N/N added. Values represent the means ± SE (error bars). Letters associated with means correspond to the results of multiple comparison tests.

Treatment Dry weight (g)
Shoot
Root
YD6
NK57
YD6
NK57
IA EA IA EA IA EA IA EA
−N 3.4b 3.9b 3.8b 4.5a 1.8c 2.2b 1.9c 2.5a
LN 3.6b 4.1b 4.0b 4.9a 1.6b 2.3a 1.8b 2.6a
NO3-N 4.1b 4.4b 4.1b 5.1a 1.9b 2.7a 2.0b 2.7a
N/N 3.7c 4.2b 4.3b 5.0a 1.7b 2.3a 2.1b 2.6a
NH4-N 3.4c 4.2b 3.6c 5.4a 1.4b 2.3a 1.4b 2.7a
Treatment Total N (mg g−1)
Shoot
Root
YD6
NK57
YD6
NK57
IA EA IA EA IA EA IA EA
−N 38.0a 39.3a 37.2a 40.4a 14.2c 19.4b 22.2a 23.4a
LN 41.9a 43.1a 42.2a 43.7a 15.0c 23.2b 25.3a 25.0a
NO3-N 43.8a 43.4a 40.1a 42.4a 25.1a 25.0a 17.7b 25.3a
N/N 45.7ab 48.3a 42.9b 43.4b 26.1a 23.7a 25.1a 24.1a
NH4-N 48.3a 43.8ab 42.5b 46b 24.3a 23.3a 24.6a 25.0a

Table 4.

Results from a full model factorial experiment ANOVA of dry weight, total N and ethylene production in rice seedlings with cultivar, aeration and N supplied conditions as factors.

Source df Mean2 F P
(A) Dry weight
 Cultivar 1 8.817 93.208 <0.0001
 Aeration 1 34.051 359.975 <0.0001
 N 4 1.109 11.724 <0.0001
 Cultivar × aeration 1 1.350 14.272 0.001
 Cultivar × N 4 0.193 2.044 0.107
 Aeration × N 4 0.832 8.799 <0.0001
 Cultivar × aeration × N 4 0.172 1.815 0.145
 Error 80
(B) Total N
 Cultivar 1 29.506 18.568 <0.0001
 Aeration 1 19.184 12.072 0.001
 N 4 32.510 20.458 <0.0001
 Cultivar × aeration 1 1.576 0.991 0.325
 Cultivar × N 4 49.839 31.363 <0.0001
 Aeration × N 4 17.035 10.720 <0.0001
 Cultivar × aeration × N 3 37.267 23.451 <0.0001
 Error 80
(C) Ethylene production
 Cultivar 1 0.121 37.204 <0.0001
 Aeration 1 0.590 182.018 <0.0001
 N 4 0.041 12.761 <0.0001
 Cultivar × aeration 1 0.010 3.048 0.088
 Cultivar × N 4 0.002 0.713 0.588
 Aeration × N 4 0.039 11.974 <0.0001
 Cultivar × aeration × N 4 0.001 0.164 0.955
 Error 40

To detect the effects of aeration on aerenchyma formation, root segments were sectioned at 1–1.5 and 2–2.5 cm from the root tip. Transverse root sections showed that aerenchyma was more developed in YD6 than in NK57, and that it was less well developed under EA conditions in both cultivars (Fig. 2E and F; see Supporting Information—Fig. S1A and B). This effect was particularly noticeable in the sections obtained 1.5 cm from the root tip, in which aerenchyma formation was reduced from ∼16 to 0 % by EA in both cultivars (Fig. 2G; see Supporting Information—Fig. S1C). In the sections obtained 2.5 cm from the root tip, aerenchyma formation was decreased in NK57 roots by ∼9 % (Fig. 2H; see Supporting Information—Fig. S1D). Aerenchyma formation was significantly different between cultivars and between aeration treatments but not between cultivar and aeration treatment (Table 2C and D).

Ethylene production in NK57 was higher than that in YD6 after IA treatment, but no difference was observed after EA (Fig. 2I). Under EA conditions, ethylene production in both cultivars was significantly lower than that under IA treatments without N added (Fig. 2I and Table 2E). Under different N supplied conditions, ethylene production showed significant differences between cultivars, aeration conditions and N treatments. There was also a significant interaction between aeration and N treatments (Fig. 3 and Table 4C). Furthermore, under IA conditions, LN and NO3-N enhanced ethylene production in both rice cultivars compared with N/N and NH4+- N treatments (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Ethylene production of YD6 and NK57 with different N supply. Black indicates ethylene production under IA conditions and red indicates ethylene production under EA conditions of YD6 (open circles) and NK57 (filled circles) seedlings with −N, LN, NO3-N, NH4-N and N/N treatments. Values represent the means ± SE (error bars) of three replicates.

External aeration treatment increased total N concentration in the roots under N-limited or nitrate-only conditions

Since root morphology and aerenchyma formation were both affected by EA treatment, and EA could affect N transport and acquisition in plants (Hu et al. 2014; Saengwilai et al. 2014), we further explored the effects of aeration on total N accumulation under varying N supply conditions. No significant differences were observed in the shoot N concentration in either cultivar in response to EA treatment (Table 3). In the roots of YD6 grown without N or in a LN solution, and in those of NK57 grown in a NO3-N solution, total N concentration increased significantly after EA treatment (Table 3). However, the total N concentration in the roots of both rice cultivars did not change significantly when grown under ammonium only or a mixed supply of nitrate and ammonium (Table 3). And the total N concentration showed no significant difference between cultivars, but there was a significant difference for aeration or N treatment (Table 4B).

External aeration treatment affected the expression of aerenchyma-formation-related genes in roots, depending on the rice cultivar and N supply

Since root aerenchyma formation was strongly affected by aeration treatment (Fig. 2), we determined the effects of aeration on the expression of aerenchyma-formation-related genes in roots. External aeration decreased the expression of the OsBphi008a and OsPDCD5 genes by 12–43 % (Fig. 4A and B) and of OsPAD4 by ∼60 % in both cultivars compared with IA treatment (Fig. 4C). Expression levels of OsLSD1.1 (Fig. 4D), OsLSD2 (Fig. 4E) and OsEDS (Fig. 4F) changed significantly after EA treatment in YD6 (downregulated by 58, 48 and 32 %, respectively). The expression of these genes in NK57 was not significantly different between the IA and EA treatments, except for OsEDS, which was upregulated (Fig. 4F). Nitrogen deficiency and NO3-N enhanced the porosity of, and aerenchyma formation in, rice roots (Wang et al. 2005; Abiko and Obara 2014). Therefore, a detailed time-course analysis of the expression was performed for aerenchyma-formation-related genes under different supplies of LN and NO3-N. The expression of OsPAD4 and OsLSD1.1 in YD6 peaked at 2 h under LN conditions (Fig. 5A and C) and at 0.5 h under NO3-N (Fig. 5B and D) conditions after IA treatment compared with EA treatment. After 48 h of aeration, the expression of OsPAD4 was not affected in either rice variety compared with IA treatment under LN conditions (Fig. 5A and Table 5A). However, the expression of OsLSD1.1 during 48 h of aeration showed the opposite trend in both rice varieties (Fig. 5C). OsLSD1.1 expression was suppressed in YD6, but induced in NK57, by EA under LN conditions (Fig. 5C and Table 5B). Interestingly, the expression patterns of OsPAD4 and OsLSD1.1 under NO3-N supply differed from those under LN supply; expression levels of both OsPAD4 (Fig. 5B) and OsLSD1.1 (Fig. 5D) were significantly suppressed during aeration in both rice varieties (Table 5C and D). We also evaluated the expression of OsPAD4 and OsLSD1.1 under N/N and NH4-N conditions [see Supporting Information—Fig. S2]. The results showed that OsPAD4 expression was significantly downregulated in YD6 but significantly upregulated in NK57 by EA treatment with N/N [see Supporting Information—Fig. S2A] and NH4-N [see Supporting Information—Fig. S2B] supply.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Real-time quantitative reverse transcription (RT)-PCR analysis of aerenchyma-formation-related gene expression in YD6 and NK57 roots under IA and EA conditions without N supply. RNA was extracted from 5-day-old seedlings grown hydroponically in water with aeration or non-aeration. Expression of OsBphi008a (A), OsPDCD5 (B), OsPAD4 (C), OsLSD1.1 (D), OsLSD2 (E) and OsEDS (F), which indicated ethylene content and aerenchyma formation, was examined. OsActin expression was used for normalization. Values represent the means ± SE (error bars) of three replicates. Significant differences are indicated by different letters (P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Real-time quantitative RT-PCR analysis of aerenchyma-formation-related gene expression in the roots of rice seedlings grown in LN and NO3-N nutrient solutions under IA and EA conditions. (A and B) Time course of OsPAD4 expression under LN (A) and NO3-N (B) conditions. (C and D) Time course of OsLSD1.1 expression under LN (C) and NO3-N (D) conditions. Seedlings grown with or without aeration were transferred to LN or NO3-N nutrient solution and roots were collected for gene expression analysis at 0, 0.5, 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h. Values represent means ± SE (error bars) of three replicates.

Table 5.

Results from an ANCOVA evaluating the influence of aeration and duration on aerenchyma-formation-related gene expression in different rice varieties under LN and NO3-N conditions.

Cultivar Source df Mean2 F P
(A) OsPAD4 expression under LN conditions
 YD6 Duration 1 0.024 2.543 0.119
Aeration 1 0.051 5.285 0.027
Error 39
 NK57 Duration 1 0.153 3.223 0.080
Aeration 1 0.142 2.983 0.092
Error 39
(B) OsLSD1.1 expression under LN conditions
 YD6 Duration 1 0.010 2.094 0.156
Aeration 1 0.020 4.153 0.048
Error 39
 NK57 Duration 1 0.006 2.060 0.159
Aeration 1 0.004 1.158 0.288
Error 39
(C) OsPAD4 expression under NO3-N conditions
 YD6 Duration 1 <0.0001 0.385 0.538
Aeration 1 <0.0001 0.264 0.610
Error 39
 NK57 Duration 1 0.003 1.369 0.249
Aeration 1 0.001 0.233 0.632
Error 39
(D) OsLSD1.1 expression under NO3-N conditions
 YD6 Duration 1 0.001 0.594 0.446
Aeration 1 0.001 0.544 0.465
Error 39
 NK57 Duration 1 <0.0001 0.066 0.798
Aeration 1 0.001 0.161 0.690
Error 39

External aeration treatment regulated the expression of several N transporter genes in the roots under different N conditions

Since EA increased the total N concentration in rice roots under limited N or NO3-N supply conditions (Table 3), we explored the effects of the N treatments on the expression of N transporter genes in rice seedlings grown with IA and EA treatments. The expression levels of the N-usage-related genes (OsNRT2.1, OsNAR2.1, OsNRT2.3; OsAMT1.1, OsAMT1.2 and OsAMT1.3) were determined under −N supply. OsNRT2.1 expression was increased by ∼30 % after EA treatment in both cultivars (Fig. 6A). OsNAR2.1 (Fig. 6B) and OsNRT2.3 (Fig. 6C) expression levels changed significantly after EA treatment in YD6 only. In YD6, OsNAR2.1 (Fig. 6B) was downregulated by 31 %, but OsNRT2.3 was upregulated (Fig. 6C). Interestingly, the expression of OsNAR2.1 and OsNRT2.3 in NK57 did not differ significantly between IA and EA treatments (Fig. 6B and C). The expression of OsAMT1.1 (Fig. 6D) and OsAMT1.3 (Fig. 6F), ammonium transporter genes, was significantly reduced by ∼20 and 75 % in YD6, respectively, while OsAMT1.2 (Fig. 6E) expression was enhanced 2-fold in NK57 after EA treatment. It was also noted that expression of OsNRT2.1, OsNAR2.1 and OsAMT1.3 in YD6 and NK57 with or without EA changed over time in LN and NO3-N nutrient solutions (Fig. 7 and Table 6). Under LN conditions after 48 h of aeration, the expression levels of OsNRT2.1 (Fig. 7A and Table 6A) and OsAMT1.3 (Fig. 7E and Table 6B) increased in YD6; however, only OsAMT1.3 was significantly upregulated in NK57 (Fig. 7E). Under NO3-N treatment, the expression of OsNRT2.1 in YD6 was markedly downregulated by EA compared with IA (Fig. 7B and Table 6D). In NK57, the expression of OsNRT2.1 after 48 h of aeration was increased by 40 % (Fig. 7B), while OsNAR2.1 expression was not significantly different after 48 h of aeration under LN or NO3-N conditions (Fig. 7C and D and Table 6C and E).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Real-time quantitative RT-PCR analysis of N transporter gene expression in YD6 and NK57 roots without N supply. RNA was extracted from 5-day-old seedlings grown hydroponically in water with IA or EA. (A–C) Expression of nitrate-uptake and -transporter genes. (D–F) Expression of ammonium transporter genes. OsActin gene expression was used for normalization. Values represent means ± SE (error bars) of three replicates. Significant differences are indicated by different letters (P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA).

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Real-time quantitative RT-PCR analysis of N-usage-related gene expression in the roots of rice seedlings grown in LN and NO3-N nutrient solutions with IA and EA treatments. (A and B) Time course of OsNRT2.1 expression under LN (A) and NO3-N (B) conditions. (C and D) Time course of OsNAR2.1 expression under LN (C) and NO3-N (D) conditions. (E) Time course of OsAMT1.3 expression under LN conditions. Seedlings grown with or without aeration were transferred to a LN or NO3-N nutrient solution, and the roots were collected for gene expression analysis at 0, 0.5, 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h. Values represent the means ± SE (error bars) of three replicates.

Table 6.

Results from an ANCOVA evaluating the influence of aeration and duration on N-usage-related gene expression in different rice varieties under LN and NO3-N conditions.

Cultivar Source df Mean2 F P
(A) OsNRT2.1 expression under LN conditions
 YD6 Duration 1 13.176 27.213 <0.0001
Aeration 1 0.042 0.088 0.769
Error 39
 NK57 Duration 1 16.935 17.086 <0.0001
Aeration 1 3.363 3.392 0.073
Error 39
(B) OsAMT1.3 expression under LN conditions
 YD6 Duration 1 60.377 19.198 <0.0001
Aeration 1 1.495 0.475 0.495
Error 39
 NK57 Duration 1 68.054 5.189 0.028
Aeration 1 0.702 0.054 0.818
Error 39
(C) OsNAR2.1 expression under LN conditions
 YD6 Duration 1 26.407 27.197 <0.0001
Aeration 1 0.276 0.284 0.597
Error 39
 NK57 Duration 1 208.806 8.585 0.006
Aeration 1 88.635 3.644 0.064
Error 39
(D) OsNRT2.1 expression under NO3-N conditions
 YD6 Duration 1 37.915 13.750 0.001
Aeration 1 6.627 2.403 0.129
Error 39
 NK57 Duration 1 17.972 15.068 <0.0001
Aeration 1 0.260 0.218 0.643
Error 39
(E) OsNAR2.1 expression under NO3-N conditions
 YD6 Duration 1 21.900 28.819 <0.0001
Aeration 1 2.602 3.424 0.072
Error 39
 NK57 Duration 1 118.552 45.685 <0.0001
Aeration 1 0.048 0.018 0.893
Error 39

Discussion

External aeration treatment improved rice growth

Field oxygenation levels can affect rice growth and generally most rice cultivars show greater root biomass in deep-water or drained soils in comparison with conventional waterlogged growth conditions (Colmer et al. 2006; Parlanti et al. 2011). Oxygenation of hydroponic solutions used for rice growth increased adventitious root length, the absorption area and total biomass (Xu et al. 2012a). However, several reports have also shown that flooding treatments decrease adventitious root emergence and elongation (Visser and Pierik 2007; Dawood et al. 2014), and this was reviewed recently by Voesenek and Bailey-Serres (2015). In this study, we evaluated whether EA of the roots could improve rice plant growth and whether the response to O2 differed among rice cultivars (YD6 and NK57) with different aerenchyma formation. The number of adventitious roots, root surface area and root dry weight were increased by EA in YD6 and NK57 five days after germination (Fig. 2 and Table 3). The interaction between aeration and N on adventitious roots and biomass (Tables 2 and 4) indicated that O2 effects on rice plant growth depended on the N situation. Therefore, we deduced that the effect of O2 on adventitious root development of rice may depend on the different N conditions, since previous studies (Visser and Pierik 2007; Dawood et al. 2014) have focussed mainly on the effect of flooding on rice plants in potting soil conditions but not under specific N treatments. Although the effects of aeration on rice growth differed under different N conditions, EA treatment increased root dry mass more in the cultivar with less-developed aerenchyma (NK57) than in the cultivar with more-developed aerenchyma (YD6) (Table 3). However, the 48-h N treatments did not result in any significant differences in plant growth or N contents with different N treatments. This may be because the 48-h N treatment was too short to show any significant effects on rice growth.

External aeration treatment decreased ethylene production and affected aerenchyma formation by regulating related gene expression

Root aerenchyma formation was increased by water flooding and inhibited by aeration or in drained soils (Colmer et al. 2006; Parlanti et al. 2011). Our results showed that aerenchyma formation and ethylene production in rice roots were reduced by EA treatment (Figs 2 and 3), and this is consistent with the findings from above. External aeration significantly inhibited ethylene production in two rice cultivars and decreased the formation of the root aerenchyma (Figs 2 and 3). The effect of ethylene on root aerenchyma formation was documented previously in rice (Nishiuchi et al. 2012). However, we found a significant interaction between aeration and N supply on rice ethylene production (Fig. 3 and Table 4). Under nitrate and −N conditions, the effects of IA and EA on rice ethylene production were much larger than those under ammonium or mixed N supply conditions (Fig. 3). This indicated that the ethylene signal in response to the external N supply appeared before the signal related to the biomass or N content (Fig. 3 and Tables 2 and 4). We also confirmed previous data showing that aerenchyma formation in different cultivars responded to external ethylene treatments (Justin and Armstrong 1991; Kong et al. 2009) using Tukey's test, which showed a significant difference between cultivars (Fig. 3 and Table 4). This indicated that the external ethylene treatment would be similar to the internal ethylene production, even under different N supply conditions. Surprisingly, the effect of aeration on ethylene production did not depend on the rice cultivar since the interaction between aeration and cultivar was not significant (Table 4). However, there was a significant interaction between aeration and N treatment, indicating that the external N effect on ethylene synthesis depends on the aeration conditions (Table 4). There was no interaction between cultivar and N treatment or between aeration and cultivar on ethylene production (Table 4).

Nitrogen deficiency and NO3-N treatments, compared with sufficient ammonium supply, enhance the porosity and formation of the aerenchyma in roots (Drew et al. 1989; He et al. 1994; Wang et al. 2005; Abiko and Obara 2014). Recently, Yang et al. (2012) reported that different sources of N nutrition affect aerenchyma formation in rice roots. However, the regulation of gene expression during aerenchyma formation in rice is unknown. In Arabidopsis, the AtPAD4, AtLSD1 and AtEDS1 genes play a role in ethylene synthesis and aerenchyma formation (Mühlenbock et al. 2007). AtLSD1 is a negative regulator of PCD and plays a role in lysigenous aerenchyma formation. AtPAD4 and AtEDS positively regulated the induction and amount of lysigenous aerenchyma formation, thereby counteracting the inhibitory action of AtLSD1 (Mühlenbock et al. 2007). Based on these reports and our ethylene data, we explored the regulation of gene expression in rice roots by examining the expression of relevant genes, such as OsBphi008a, OsPDCD5, OsPAD4 and OsLSD1.1.

In the aeration treatment experiment, aerenchyma formation was decreased in YD6 and NK57 roots (Fig. 2), and the PCD-related genes, OsBphi008a and OsPDCD5, were downregulated in roots (Fig. 4A and B). The expression pattern of OsBphi008a, which plays a positive role in ethylene synthesis (Hu et al. 2011), and OsPDCD5, which is involved in PCD (Drew et al. 2000), also exhibited positive regulation during rice aerenchyma formation, similar to the regulation pattern of ethylene and PCD in aerenchyma formation of Arabidopsis (Mühlenbock et al. 2007). Our results showed that OsPAD4 expression was downregulated; the amount of root aerenchyma decreased in both rice cultivars, and OsLSD1.1 expression was downregulated only in YD6 by EA (Fig. 4C and D). Therefore, we hypothesized that OsPAD4 positively controlled aerenchyma formation in rice roots based on ethylene content, and that OsLSD1.1 may be located upstream of OsPAD4 in rice. In Arabidopsis, aeration and waterlogged treatments were performed under NO3-N conditions, and the expression of AtPAD4 increased under waterlogging conditions (Mühlenbock et al. 2007). However, we compared the effect of aeration on OsPAD4 under different N treatments, in which EA altered the expression of OsPAD4 in a NO3-N solution (Fig. 5B) but not under low N conditions (Fig. 5A), a mixture of N or in a NH4-N solution [see Supporting Information—Fig. S2]. The gene expression data showed that the ethylene-synthesis-related genes OsPAD4 and OsLSD1.1 peaked within 6 h of N treatment (Fig. 5). This indicates that the regulation of OsPAD4 by EA was dependent on the external N supply and occurred during the very early stages of N treatment. Furthermore, the regulatory mechanism of aerenchyma formation during aeration in rice may differ from that in Arabidopsis.

External aeration treatment increased rice N accumulation by increasing expression of the N transporter gene

Simultaneous supply of ammonium and nitrate improves plant growth, both in hydroponics and in soil (Xu et al. 1992; Qian et al. 2004; Ruan et al. 2007; Song et al. 2011). Most previous studies have reached this conclusion without considering the effect of O2 in the soil when applying different forms of N. In this study, it was shown that adding O2 through EA of the roots improved rice plant growth (Fig. 2) and N accumulation (Table 3), and that the N accumulation response to O2 differed among rice cultivars with different NUE. The results showed that total N concentration increased significantly by EA in YD6 roots without any supply of N (Table 3). Under low N conditions, the total N concentration increased in YD6 roots (Table 3), while in NK57 roots, NO3-N conditions with EA increased the total N concentration (Table 3). Tukey's test showed a significant interaction among the aeration conditions, cultivars and N treatment, which indicated that the external effect of N on different cultivar biomass and total N content depended on the aeration situation (Table 4).

The difference in N transporter gene expression between the two cultivars could explain the different N responses to EA treatments. The total N concentration in the roots of OsNAR2.1 RNAi mutant plants was 63–66 % of that in wild-type roots grown in 0.2 mM N under IA conditions (Yan et al. 2011). In the OsNAR2.1 RNAi mutant, the expression levels of OsNRT2.1 and OsNRT2.3a decreased markedly (Yan et al. 2011). In the aeration experiment, the expression of OsNRT2.1 and OsNRT2.3 increased significantly in YD6 roots after 5 days of EA treatment; however, only OsNRT2.1 expression was increased by EA treatment in NK57 roots (Fig. 6A–C). The gene expression data confirmed that the activities of enzymes involved in root N metabolism were enhanced by EA, and that the effect of EA on rice root N metabolism might be genotype specific (Xu et al. 2013). Under LN conditions, the expression levels of OsNRT2.1 and OsAMT1.3 were upregulated in YD6; however, expression of only OsAMT1.3 was increased by EA in NK57 (Fig. 7). This difference in expression levels of OsNRT2.1 (Fig. 7A) and OsAMT1.3 (Fig. 7E) between the two cultivars may have caused the changes in N concentration in rice to EA under LN conditions (Table 3). However, under NO3-N supply conditions, the expression of a primary high-affinity transporter gene in rice roots (Araki and Hasegawa 2006), OsNRT2.1, was increased by EA in NK57 (Fig. 7B) but decreased in YD6 (Fig. 7B). The increase in OsNRT2.1 expression may explain the increase in N concentration in NK57 in the presence of NO3-N condition with EA treatment. We conclude that the increased rice growth and total N acquisition by EA may be associated with the abundance of root endogenous aerenchyma and be dependent on the forms of N supplied.

Conclusions

Following the aeration experiment, rice roots showed the different abundance of aerenchyma and growth pattern in YD6 and NK57 cultivars. The ethylene production from whole rice plant was also altered by aeration treatment in both cultivars. Combining aeration and external N treatments, we found a strong interaction effect between aeration and N supplies on rice growth and total N concentration in plant. Furthermore, the increase of rice growth and total N acquisition can be explained by altering expression of the OsPAD4 and OsNRT2.1 genes in aeration under LN and NO3-N supplies.

As in waterlogged conditions, the dissolved O2 was low and main N form was ammonium (Kludze et al. 1993; Wang et al. 1993). In contrast, in upland soil, the dissolved O2 was high and main N form was nitrate N (Kludze et al. 1993; Li et al. 2008). Apparently, the gene variation in responding to EA under different N conditions suggested that aeration and external N interaction were complex for plant adaptation to environmental change from waterlogged conditions into upland soil conditions. The EA could affect the formation of aerenchyma which in turn affected the growth of roots and shoots, and thus total N acquisition by altering expression of the OsPAD4 and OsNRT2.1 genes.

Accession Numbers

Sequence data from this article can be found in the Rice Genome Initiative/GenBank data libraries under accession numbers listed in table [see Supporting Information—Table S1].

Sources of Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation (31172013) and PAPD (0306J0802).

Contributions by the Authors

J.Z. and J.L. conducted all the experiments. Z.X. was involved in ethylene measurement. X.F. designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. Q.Z. was involved in soluble O2 measurement. Q.S. and G.X. were involved in editing the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

None declared.

Supporting Information

The following additional information is available in the online version of this article –

Table S1. Primers and accession numbers used for quantitative real-time PCR.

Figure S1. Effects of aeration on aerenchyma formation of 7-day-old seedlings. Transverse section of root visualized in resin-embedded sections of YD6 (A) and NK57 (B) roots. Resin-embedded sections obtained 1.5 and 2.5 cm from the root tips of YD6 and NK57 seedlings subjected to IA and EA treatments. Quantification of aerenchyma formation in sections obtained 1.5 cm (C) and 2.5 cm (D) from the root tips, using Image J software. Values represent the means ± SE (error bars) of three replicates. Significant differences are indicated by different letters (P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA).

Figure S2. Real-time quantitative RT-PCR analysis of OsPAD4 and OsLSD1.1 expression in roots of rice seedlings grown in N/N and NH4-N nutrient solution. Time course of OsPAD4 expression in N/N (A) and NH4-N (B) nutrient solution. Time course of OsLSD1.1 expression in N/N (C) and NH4-N (D) nutrient solution. Seedlings grown with or without aeration were transferred to a LN nutrient solution and roots were collected for gene expression analysis at 0, 0.5, 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h. IA, internal aeration; EA, external aeration. Values represent the means ± SE (error bars) of three replicates.

Additional Information

Acknowledgements

The English in this document has been checked by a native speaker scientist (Textcheck Company) and Dr Ben Miller (UEA, UK).

Literature Cited

  1. Abiko T, Obara M. 2014. Enhancement of porosity and aerenchyma formation in nitrogen-deficient rice roots. Plant Science 215–216:76–83. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.10.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ai P, Sun S, Zhao J, Fan X, Xin W, Guo Q, Yu L, Shen Q, Wu P, Miller AJ, Xu G. 2009. Two rice phosphate transporters, OsPht1;2 and OsPht1;6, have different functions and kinetic properties in uptake and translocation. The Plant Journal 57:798–809. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03726.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alberda T. 1953. Growth and root development of lowland rice and its relation to oxygen supply. Plant and Soil 5:1–28. 10.1007/BF01406009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Araki R, Hasegawa H. 2006. Expression of rice (Oryza sativa L.) genes involved in high-affinity nitrate transport during the period of nitrate induction. Breeding Science 56:295–302. 10.1270/jsbbs.56.295 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Arenovski AL, Howes BL. 1992. Lacunal allocation and gas transport capacity in the salt marsh grass Spartina alterniflora. Oecologia 90:316–322. 10.1007/BF00317687 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Armstrong J, Armstrong W. 2005. Rice: sulfide-induced barriers to root radial oxygen loss, Fe2+ and water uptake, and lateral root emergence. Annals of Botany 96:625–638. 10.1093/aob/mci215 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Armstrong W. 1979. Aeration in higher plants. Advances in Botanical Research 7:236–332. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cai J, Chen L, Qu H, Lian J, Liu W, Hu Y, Xu G. 2012. Alteration of nutrient allocation and transporter genes expression in rice under N, P, K, and Mg deficiencies. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 34:939–946. 10.1007/s11738-011-0890-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Colmer TD. 2003a. Aerenchyma and an inducible barrier to radial oxygen loss facilitate root aeration in upland, paddy and deep-water rice (Oryza Sativa L.). Annals of Botany 91:301–309. 10.1093/aob/mcf114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Colmer TD. 2003b. Long-distance transport of gases in plants: a perspective on internal aeration and radial oxygen loss from roots. Plant, Cell and Environment 26:17–36. 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.00846.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Colmer TD, Gibberd MR, Wiengweera A, Tinh TK. 1998. The barrier to radial oxygen loss from roots of rice (Oryza sativa L.) is induced by growth in stagnant solution. Journal of Experimental Botany 49:1431–1436. 10.1093/jxb/49.325.1431 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Colmer TD, Cox MCH, Voesenek L. 2006. Root aeration in rice (Oryza sativa): evaluation of oxygen, carbon dioxide, and ethylene as possible regulators of root acclimatizations. New Phytologist 170:767–778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dawood T, Rieu I, Wolters-Arts M, Derksen EB, Mariani C, Visser EJW. 2014. Rapid flooding-induced adventitious root development from preformed primordia in Solanum dulcamara. AoB PLANTS 6: plt058; 10.1093/aobpla/plt058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ding X, Cao Y, Huang L, Zhao J, Xu C, Li X, Wang S. 2008. Activation of the indole-3-acetic acid-amido synthetase GH3-8 suppresses expansin expression and promotes salicylate- and jasmonate-independent basal immunity in rice. The Plant Cell 20:228–240. 10.1105/tpc.107.055657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Drew MC, He CJ, Morgan PW. 1989. Decreased ethylene biosynthesis, and induction of aerenchyma, by nitrogen- or phosphate-starvation in adventitious roots of Zea mays L. Plant Physiology 91:266–271. 10.1104/pp.91.1.266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Drew MC, He CJ, Morgan PW. 2000. Programmed cell death and aerenchyma formation in roots. Trends in Plant Science 5:123–127. 10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01570-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Duan YH, Zhang YL, Ye LT, Fan XR, Xu GH, Shen QR. 2007. Responses of rice cultivars with different nitrogen use efficiency to partial nitrate nutrition. Annals of Botany 99:1153–1160. 10.1093/aob/mcm051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Durrant WE, Dong X. 2004. Systemic acquired resistance. Annual Review of Phytopathology 42:185–209. 10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.040803.140421 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Feng H, Yan M, Fan X, Li B, Shen Q, Miller AJ, Xu G. 2011. Spatial expression and regulation of rice high-affinity nitrate transporters by nitrogen and carbon status. Journal of Experimental Botany 62:2319–2332. 10.1093/jxb/erq403 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gebauer RLE, Tenhunen JD, Reynolds JF. 1996. Soil aeration in relation to soil physical properties, nitrogen availability, and root characteristics within an arctic watershed. Plant and Soil 178:37–48. 10.1007/BF00011161 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. He CJ, Morgan PW, Drew MC. 1992. Enhanced sensitivity to ethylene in nitrogen-or phosphate-starved roots of Zea mays L. during aerenchyma formation. Plant Physiology 98:137–142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. He CJ, Drew MC, Morgan PW. 1994. Induction of enzymes associated with lysigenous aerenchyma formation in roots of Zea mays during hypoxia or nitrogen starvation. Plant Physiology 105:861–865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hu B, Henry A, Brown KM, Lynch JP. 2014. Root cortical aerenchyma inhibits radial nutrient transport in maize (Zea mays). Annals of Botany 113:181–189. 10.1093/aob/mct259 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hu J, Zhou J, Peng X, Xu H, Liu C, Du B, Yuan H, Zhu L, He G. 2011. The Bphi008a gene interacts with the ethylene pathway and transcriptionally regulates MAPK genes in the response of rice to brown planthopper feeding. Plant Physiology 156:856–872. 10.1104/pp.111.174334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jackson MB, Armstrong W. 1999. Formation of aerenchyma and the processes of plant ventilation in relation to soil flooding and submergence. Plant Biology 1:274–287. 10.1111/j.1438-8677.1999.tb00253.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Justin S, Armstrong W. 1991. Evidence for the involvement of ethene in aerenchyma formation in adventitious roots of rice (Oryza sativa L.). New Phytologist 118:49–62. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1991.tb00564.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kludze HK, Delaune RD, Patrick WH. 1993. Aerenchyma formation and methane and oxygen exchange in rice. Soil Science Society of America Journal 57:386–391. 10.2136/sssaj1993.03615995005700020017x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kong Y, Wang Z, Chen J, Pan XT, Liu DT, Zhang EJ. 2009. Effects of ethephon on aerenchyma formation in rice roots. Rice Science 16:210–216. 10.1016/S1672-6308(08)60081-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lei J, Finlayson SA, Salzman RA, Shan L, Zhu-Salzman K. 2014. BOTRYTIS-INDUCED KINASE1 modulates Arabidopsis resistance to green peach aphids via PHYTOALEXIN DEFICIENT4. Plant Physiology 165:1657–1670. 10.1104/pp.114.242206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Li B, Xin W, Sun S, Shen Q, Xu G. 2006. Physiological and molecular responses of nitrogen-starved rice plants to re-supply of different nitrogen sources. Plant and Soil 287:145–159. 10.1007/s11104-006-9051-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Li YL, Fan XR, Shen QR. 2008. The relationship between rhizosphere nitrification and nitrogen-use efficiency in rice plants. Plant, Cell and Environment 31:73–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mühlenbock P, Plaszczyca M, Plaszczyca M, Mellerowicz E, Karpinski S. 2007. Lysigenous aerenchyma formation in Arabidopsis is controlled by LESION SIMULATING DISEASE1. The Plant Cell 19:3819–3830. 10.1105/tpc.106.048843 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Nishiuchi S, Yamauchi T, Takahashi H, Kotula L, Nakazono M. 2012. Mechanisms for coping with submergence and waterlogging in rice. Rice 5:2 10.1186/1939-8433-5-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Parlanti S, Kudahettige NP, Lombardi L, Mensuali-Sodi A, Alpi A, Perata P, Pucciariello C. 2011. Distinct mechanisms for aerenchyma formation in leaf sheaths of rice genotypes displaying a quiescence or escape strategy for flooding tolerance. Annals of Botany 107:1335–1343. 10.1093/aob/mcr086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Qian X, Shen Q, Xu G, Wang J, Zhou M. 2004. Nitrogen form effects on yield and nitrogen uptake of rice crop grown in aerobic soil. Journal of Plant Nutrition 27:1061–1076. 10.1081/PLN-120037536 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Qiu D, Xiao J, Ding X, Xiong M, Cai M, Cao Y, Li X, Xu C, Wang S. 2007. OsWRKY13 mediates rice disease resistance by regulating defense-related genes in salicylate- and jasmonate-dependent signaling. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 20:492–499. 10.1094/MPMI-20-5-0492 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ruan J, Gerendás J, Härdter R, Sattelmacher B. 2007. Effect of nitrogen form and root-zone pH on growth and nitrogen uptake of tea (Camellia sinensis) plants. Annals of Botany 99:301–310. 10.1093/aob/mcl258 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Saengwilai P, Nord EA, Chimungu JG, Brown KM, Lynch JP. 2014. Root cortical aerenchyma enhances nitrogen acquisition from low-nitrogen soils in Maize. Plant Physiology 166:726–735. 10.1104/pp.114.241711 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Song W, Makeen K, Wang D, Zhang C, Xu Y, Zhao H, Tu E, Zhang Y, Shen Q, Xu G. 2011. Nitrate supply affects root growth differentially in two rice cultivars differing in nitrogen use efficiency. Plant and Soil 343:357–368. 10.1007/s11104-011-0723-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sonoda Y, Ikeda A, Saiki S, Von Wirén N, Yamaya T, Yamaguchi J. 2003. Distinct expression and function of three ammonium transporter genes (OsAMT1;1–1;3) in rice. Plant and Cell Physiology 44:726–734. 10.1093/pcp/pcg083 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Steffens B, Geske T, Sauter M. 2011. Aerenchyma formation in the rice stem and its promotion by H2O2. New Phytologist 190:369–378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Su W, Wu J, Wei C, Li K, He G, Attla K, Qian X, Yang J. 2006. Interaction between programmed cell death 5 and calcineurin B-like interacting protein kinase 23 in Oryza sativa. Plant Science 170:1150–1155. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2006.02.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Takahashi H, Yamauchi T, Rajhi I, Nishizawa NK, Nakazono M. 2015. Transcript profiles in cortical cells of maize primary root during ethylene-induced lysigenous aerenchyma formation under aerobic conditions. Annals of Botany 115:879–894. 10.1093/aob/mcv018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Tang Z, Fan X, Li Q, Feng H, Miller AJ, Shen Q, Xu G. 2012. Knockdown of a rice stelar nitrate transporter alters long-distance translocation but not root influx. Plant Physiology 160:2052–2063. 10.1104/pp.112.204461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Teal JM, Kanwisher JW. 1966. Gas transport in the marsh grass, Spartina alterniflora. Jounal of Experimental Botany 17:355–361. 10.1093/jxb/17.2.355 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Visser EJW, Pierik R. 2007. Inhibition of root elongation by ethylene in wetland and non-wetland plant species and the impact of longitudinal ventilation. Plant, Cell and Environment 30:31–38. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01601.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Voesenek LACJ, Bailey-Serres J. 2015. Flood adaptive traits and processes: an overview. New Phytologist 206:57–73. 10.1111/nph.13209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wang MY, Siddiqi MY, Ruth TJ, Glass AD. 1993. Ammonium uptake by rice roots (II. Kinetics of 13NH4+ influx across the plasmalemma). Plant Physiology 103:1259–1267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wang XL, Si JH, Chen D, Feng K. 2005. Effects of different nitrogen sources on rice root aerenchyma formation at low pH level. Journal of Yangzhou University (Agricultural and Life Science Edition) 26:65–70. [Google Scholar]
  50. Xu C, Wang D, Chen S, Chen L, Zhang X. 2012a. Effect of aeration on root growth and nitrogen metabolism in rice. Chinese Journal of Rice Science 26:320–324. [Google Scholar]
  51. Xu C, Wang D, Chen S, Chen L, Zhang X. 2013. Effects of aeration on root physiology and nitrogen metabolism in rice. Rice Science 20:148–153. 10.1016/S1672-6308(13)60118-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Xu G, Fan X, Miller AJ. 2012b. Plant nitrogen assimilation and use efficiency. Annual Review of Plant Biology 63:153–182. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105532 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Xu J, Li Y, Wang Y, Liu H, Lei L, Yang H, Liu G, Ren D. 2008. Activation of MAPK kinase 9 induces ethylene and camalexin biosynthesis and enhances sensitivity to salt stress in Arabidopsis. Journal of Biological Chemistry 283:26996–27006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Xu QF, Tsai CL, Tsai CY. 1992. Interaction of potassium with the form and amount of nitrogen nutrition on growth and nitrogen uptake of maize. Journal of Plant Nutrition 15:23–33. 10.1080/01904169209364299 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Yan M, Fan X, Feng H, Miller AJ, Shen Q, Xu G. 2011. Rice OsNAR2.1 interacts with OsNRT2.1, OsNRT2.2 and OsNRT2.3a nitrate transporters to provide uptake over high and low concentration ranges. Plant, Cell and Environment 34:1360–1372. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02335.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Yang X, Li Y, Ren B, Ding L, Gao C, Shen Q, Guo S. 2012. Drought-induced root aerenchyma formation restricts water uptake in rice seedlings supplied with nitrate. Plant and Cell Physiology 53:495–504. 10.1093/pcp/pcs003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Yoshida T, Ancajas RR. 1973. Nitrogen-fixing activity in upland and flooded rice fields. Soil Science Society of America Journal 37:42–46. 10.2136/sssaj1973.03615995003700010017x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Yu KW, Wang ZP, Chen GX. 1997. Nitrous oxide and methane transport through rice plants. Biology and Fertility of Soils 24:341–343. 10.1007/s003740050254 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Yuan H, Chen X, Zhu L, He G. 2004. Isolation and characterization of a novel rice gene encoding a putative insect-inducible protein homologous to wheat Wir1. Journal of Plant Physiology 161:79–85. 10.1078/0176-1617-01206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Zhao SP, Ye XZ, Shi WM. 2014. Expression of OsAMT1 (1.1-1.3) in rice varieties differing in nitrogen accumulation. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology 61:707–713. 10.1134/S1021443714040220 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Additional Information

Articles from AoB Plants are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES