Skip to main content
The Journal of Reproduction and Development logoLink to The Journal of Reproduction and Development
. 2015 Oct 9;61(6):589–593. doi: 10.1262/jrd.2015-087

Finding of a highly efficient ZFN pair for Aqpep gene functioning in murine zygotes

Wataru FUJII 1, Asuka ONUMA 1, Shin YOSHIOKA 1, Keisuke NAGASHIMA 1, Koji SUGIURA 1, Kunihiko NAITO 1
PMCID: PMC4685226  PMID: 26460691

Abstract

The generation efficiencies of mutation-induced mice when using engineered zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs) have been generally 10 to 20% of obtained pups in previous studies. The discovery of high-affinity DNA-binding modules can contribute to the generation of various kinds of novel artificial chromatin-targeting tools, such as zinc-finger acetyltransferases, zinc-finger histone kinases and so on, as well as improvement of reported zinc-finger recombinases and zinc-finger methyltransferases. Here, we report a novel ZFN pair that has a highly efficient mutation-induction ability in murine zygotes. The ZFN pair induced mutations in all obtained mice in the target locus, exon 17 of aminopeptidase Q gene, and almost all of the pups had biallelic mutations. This high efficiency was also shown in the plasmid DNA transfected in a cultured human cell line. The induced mutations were inherited normally in the next generation. The zinc-finger modules of this ZFN pair are expected to contribute to the development of novel ZF-attached chromatin-targeting tools.

Keywords: Artificial endonuclease, Genome-modified animals, Zinc-finger nuclease (ZFN)


Engineered zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs), which consist of a DNA-binding module of multiple C2H2 zinc-finger motifs and a FokI-derived DNA endonuclease unit, can induce a DNA double-strand break (DSB) in any target locus in diverse cell types and living organisms [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. In mice, the induction of ZFNs into zygotes can generate genome-modified mice inexpensively and rapidly, and so far, diverse gene-modified mice have been generated by ZFNs [1,2,3, 12]. Engineered DNA-binding modules can also be used for a variety of artificial chromatin-targeting proteins by attaching enzymes other than DNA endonucleases. Engineered zinc-finger DNA-binding modules (ZF-binding modules) have already been applied to, for example, zinc-finger recombinases and zinc-finger methyltransferases [13,14,15,16,17,18]. A recent report on a novel construction method for ZFNs, by which arbitrary ZFNs can be synthesized rapidly, repeatedly and inexpensively [12], suggests a wider application of ZF-binding modules to artificial chromatin-targeting proteins in various research fields.

To generate an artificial chromatin-targeting protein, an enzyme is attached to a DNA-binding module through an appropriate amino acid linker. Several improvements in various areas, such as the length and configuration of the linker and modifications of the enzyme, are considered necessary to obtain suitable molecules [17, 19]. In these trial-and-error processes, the presence of high-affinity DNA-binding modules should be advantageous in obtaining an efficient architecture. Therefore, the discovery of high-affinity ZF-binding modules can contribute to the generation of various kinds of novel artificial chromatin-targeting tools, such as ZF acetyltransferases, ZF deacethylases, ZF histone kinases, ZF phosphatases and so on, as well as the improvement of reported zinc-finger recombinases and zinc-finger methyltransferases. However, it is difficult to design a highly efficient ZFN pair in cellulo using the information from in vitro affinity assays. Previously, the binding of zinc-finger motifs to various triplet sets with high affinity by in vitro screening was reported [21,22,23,24,25,26,27], but not all ZF-binding modules, which consist of high-affinity zinc-finger motifs, have a high affinity for target DNA sequences in cellulo, because of the chromatin state [27,28,29] or the “context-dependent effect” of the flanking DNA sequences [20]. The mutation-generating efficiencies of regular ZFNs are usually less than 25% of obtained pups [12], and the highest efficiency for a reported ZFN has never exceeded 70%.

In the present study, we report a novel ZFN pair with a highly efficient mutation-induction ability in murine zygotes. We constructed a ZFN set for exon 17 of the mouse 4833403I15Rik gene, known as aminopeptidase Q (Aqpep), and found that all of the obtained pups, which were derived from zygotes injected with the ZFN mRNA, exhibited induced mutations on the target locus. These induced mutations were inherited in the next generation. In addition, the high affinity of the present ZF-binding module pair was compared with that of a previously reported ZF-binding module pair having a high affinity score by a single-strand annealing (SSA) assay using partial eGFP-coding plasmid DNA in order to clarify the “context-dependent effect” of the DNA sequence.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

All animal care and experiments conformed to the Guidelines for Animal Experiments of ahe University of Tokyo and were approved by the Animal Research Committee of the University of Tokyo.

Construction of plasmid DNAs

The left and right ZFN plasmids were constructed by the overlap extension PCR and TA cloning (OLTA) method according to a previous report [12]. Constructed DNA sequences and predicted amino acid sequences are shown in Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2 (online only). For construction of SSA reporter plasmid DNA, two overlapped fragments of eGFP ORF (1 to 601 and 120 to 710) were cloned by PCR using primers (EGxxFP Fw1 and Rv1 and EGxxFP Fw2 and Rv2) shown in Supplementary Table 1 (online only). Each PCR amplicon was joined at the BamHI site and inserted into the EcoRI site of a pCAGGS vector. The forward and reverse target oligonucleotides shown in Supplementary Table 1 (Aqpep insert and Rosa26 insert) were annealed and ligated at the BsmBI site of the plasmid vectors. These vectors were sequenced using a commercial sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and a DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

In vitro synthesis of RNA, microinjection and generation of genome-modified mice

ZFN mRNAs were synthesized in vitro according to a previous report [12]. Ten micrograms/milliliter of left and right ZFN mRNAs were mixed at a ratio of 1:1, and the mRNA solution (about 4 pl) was microinjected into the cytoplasm of C57BL/6NCr zygotes obtained by natural mating and oviduct flushing. After microinjection, the zygotes were cultured in M16 medium for 24 h, and 10 to 12 embryos that reached the 2-cell stage were transferred into each oviduct of 0.5 dpc pseudopregnant ICR female mice. Pups were obtained by natural childbirth, and their genomic DNAs were extracted from their tails. Mutation induction in the pups was evaluated by direct sequencing of genomic PCR products using each of the 4 forward and 4 reverse primers shown in Supplementary Table 1 as appropriate.

SSA assay using eGFP reporter plasmids

SSA assays using eGFP reporter plasmid DNAs were performed according to previous studies [22, 30] with some modifications. Briefly, 250 ng of reporter plasmid vector and 200 ng of left and right ZFN plasmid vectors were transfected into 1 × 105 of HEK293 cells with Lipofectamine LTX according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Forty-eight hours after transfection, confluently grown cells were fixed with 3.5% PFA in PBS, and then the fluorescent signals were observed using a confocal laser scanning microscope. Three rounds of experiments were performed, and obtained fluorescent signals were measured by ImageJ and analyzed statistically by Student’s t-test.

Results

First, left and right ZFN plasmids on exon 17 of mouse Aqpep were constructed by the OLTA method (Fig. 1, Table 1) [12]. The mRNAs of the ZFN pair were injected into C57BL/6NCr mouse zygotes, and after these embryos were transferred, 16 live pups were obtained. The mutation induction in the obtained pups was assessed by the direct sequencing of genomic PCR products, which revealed that all of the pups had diverse mutation patterns (+4 to –2350) in the target locus (Fig. 2A). Three of the obtained pups were monoallelic and showed a wild-type allele with a mutation allele by PCR direct sequencing, but the other 13 pups showed only mutation alleles that indicated biallelic mutations.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Schematics of constructed ZFNs and the target DNA sequence. L1–4 and R1–4 indicate each zinc-finger motif.

Table 1. Amino acid sequences of DNA recognition sites in each zinc-finger motif used in the ZFNs.

DNA recognition sequence Target triplet DNA
L1 DRSHLTR GGC
L2 DRSNLTR GAC
L3 QSGNLTE CAA
L4 QSGNLAR GAA
R1 QSSSLVR GTA
R2 QSGDLTR GCA
R3 QSSDLTR GCT
R4 QAGHLAS TGA

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Generation of mutant mice and their inheritance. (A) Mutation patterns of mutated alleles from 16 obtained pups. The target loci of the pups were amplified by genomic PCR, and the PCR products were sequenced directly. Three pups were monoallelic mutants, and the other 13 were biallelic mutants. Four mutated alleles were not defined by the present PCR analysis. The vertical row indicates the number of inserted (+) or deleted (–) bases in each allele, and the horizontal row indicates the number of alleles having the indicated mutations. (B) Inheritance analysis of the mutations. A female having 2 base deletions in both alleles and a male having 5 base deletions and 16 base deletions in each allele were used as F0 mice. F0 mutations were naturally inherited in all F1 pups, but one unexpected mutation was observed in one pup.

One male having 5 base deletions and 16 base deletions in each allele, respectively, and one female having the same 2 base deletions in both alleles were mated, and the inheritances of the mutation allele were assessed in the next generation. The F0 mutations were naturally inherited in the next generation, but one unexpected mutation pattern was observed in one F1 pup, indicating mosaicism in germ cells of the male (Fig. 2B). There was no apparent phenotype in F0 and F1 pups.

The binding of zinc-finger proteins to their target DNA is known to be affected by their chromatin states, such as DNA CpG methylation and histone modifications [27,28,29]. Therefore, in order to clarify whether the high activity level of the present ZFN pair depends on the high affinity of the ZF-binding modules for the target sequences or not, we compared the DSB-induction activity of the present and previous ZFNs for Rosa26 [12], which showed mutation induction in 10–20% of pups [12], by an SSA assay using reporter plasmids with no chromatin modifications for the targets. No signal was observed in the cells transfected with only reporter plasmids (Fig. 3). In contrast, the cells transfected with Aqpep reporter plasmids and the Aqpep-ZFN pair showed significantly higher levels of signaling than the cells transfected with the Rosa26 reporter plasmid and the Rosa26-ZFN pair (Fig. 3). These results suggest that the Aqpep-ZFN pair has a high affinity for the target DNA sequence.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

SSA assay of the Aqpep-ZFN and Rosa 26-ZFN pairs. (A) One of the eGFP reporter plasmids was transfected with or without the corresponding ZFN plasmid into HEK293 cells, and then the fluorescent signals were observed after 48 h. (B) Three rounds of experiments were performed, and the fluorescent signals were analyzed by ImageJ. The results are shown as the mean + SD. * Significant difference (P < 0.05). N.S., no significant difference.

Discussion

In the present study, we found incidentally a novel ZFN pair that could induce an indel mutation with extremely high efficiency in a target locus in mouse zygotes. Recently, the CRISPR/Cas system, another kind of engineered endonuclease system, consisting of guideRNA, a DNA-binding RNA module, and Cas9, a specific DNA endonuclease binding with guideRNA, was also found to be applicable for the generation of gene-modified animals [31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. The CRISPR/Cas system can induce indel mutations in target loci of almost all obtained pups by microinjection of guideRNA and Cas9 mRNA into zygotes in mice and rats [31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. The mutation generation efficiency of the ZFN pair found in the present study was comparable to that of the CRISPR/Cas system, showing the high possibility of ZFNs but in only some limited cases. We also showed the inheritance of the mutations induced by the present ZFN pair in the next generation and the presence of mosaicism in one of the pups. These characteristics are also the same as those reported for CRISPR/Cas systems.

Several methods to measure the binding affinity of a zing-finger motif to a DNA triplet in vitro have been reported [21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. These assays have reported zinc-finger motifs bound to specific DNA triplets with high affinity [21, 22]. However, even though these high-affinity zinc-finger motifs were joined, not all of the ZF-binding modules could bind to the target loci efficiently in cellulo [27]. This was attributed to the “context-dependent effect,” which is the effect of other nucleotide sequences flanking the target triplet on the binding affinity of the zinc-finger motif [20]. This indicates the difficulty of designing ZFN pairs having high efficiency in cellulo by using the information from in vitro affinity assays. In fact, a previous study showed the number of quality parameters for each zinc-finger motif for DNA triplet binding [21, 22]. According to the score table, the total numbers of quality parameters of the present ZFNs, 4 and 10 for the left and right ZF-binding modules, respectively, were not higher but were rather lower than those of our previous Rosa26-ZFNs (7 and 10 for the left and right ZF-binding modules, respectively), which induced mutations in 12.5 to 22.7% of generated pups. This shows clearly that it is necessary to predict the efficiency of ZF-binding modules in cellulo with consideration for elements other than the parameters obtained by an in vitro affinity assay of a DNA triplet.

The DNA-binding affinities of the modules are expected to be affected by epigenetic modifications such as DNA methylation and histone methylation, phosphorylation, acetylation and sumoylation as well as target DNA sequences. We addressed this issue in the present study with the SSA assay using vector DNAs of the target sequences and revealed that the present Aqpep-ZFN pair had much higher efficiency than the previous Rosa26-ZFN pair, suggesting that the high efficiency is due mainly to the affinity to the target DNA sequence. Although this result does not exclude the influence of epigenetic modifications on ZFN efficiency, the importance of the context-dependent effect of the DNA sequence for the high affinity of the ZF-binding modules was indicated.

The transcription activator-like effector nuclease (TALEN) is another kind of engineered endonuclease system having the same FokI endonuclease unit as ZFN, and it is also applied to the generation of gene-modified animals [38, 39]. The transcription activator-like effector, a DNA-binding module of TALEN, has been reported to have almost the same DNA-binding affinity as ZF-binding modules, but it is known to have no bothersome context effect [40]. However, each unit of the transcription activator-like effector consists of 33–35 amino acids that recognize only one base, whereas each zinc-finger motif consists of fewer than 30 amino acids and can recognize triplet bases; therefore a ZF-binding module can target a much longer DNA sequence than a transcription activator-like effector having the same molecular weight. In addition, it takes less labor to construct ZF-binding modules than transcription activator-like effector modules. Artificial chromatin-targeting enzymes other than endonucleases, such as methylase, recombinase and acetylase, have been reported using only zinc-finger motifs as DNA-binding modules [13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Recently a novel construction method for ZFNs, by which arbitrary ZFNs can be synthesized rapidly, repeatedly and inexpensively, has been reported [12]. This method should accelerate the use of ZF-binding modules in a variety of fields. These enzymes are attached to the DNA-binding module through appropriate linker amino acids, and the length of a linker sequence should be crucial to the enzyme activity. Since the ZF-binding module pair we reported here is certain to bind to the target sequence, ZF-containing enzymes could be modified or improved without the need to consider DNA-binding affinity if the present ZF-binding module is used. This module is expected to contribute significantly to further development of artificial chromatin-targeting proteins.

Supplementary

Supplement
jrd-61-589-s001.pdf (83.8KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (26712025 to WF, 25252056 to KN) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

References

  • 1.Perez-Pinera P, Ousterout DG, Gersbach CA. Advances in targeted genome editing. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2012; 16: 268–277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Meyer M, de Angelis MH, Wurst W, Kühn R. Gene targeting by homologous recombination in mouse zygotes mediated by zinc-finger nucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107: 15022–15026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hermann M, Maeder ML, Rector K, Ruiz J, Becher B, Bürki K, Khayter C, Aguzzi A, Joung JK, Buch T, Pelczar P. Evaluation of OPEN zinc finger nucleases for direct gene targeting of the ROSA26 locus in mouse embryos. PLoS ONE 2012; 7: e41796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Geurts AM, Cost GJ, Freyvert Y, Zeitler B, Miller JC, Choi VM, Jenkins SS, Wood A, Cui X, Meng X, Vincent A, Lam S, Michalkiewicz M, Schilling R, Foeckler J, Kalloway S, Weiler H, Ménoret S, Anegon I, Davis GD, Zhang L, Rebar EJ, Gregory PD, Urnov FD, Jacob HJ, Buelow R. Knockout rats via embryo microinjection of zinc-finger nucleases. Science 2009; 325: 433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hauschild J, Petersen B, Santiago Y, Queisser AL, Carnwath JW, Lucas-Hahn A, Zhang L, Meng X, Gregory PD, Schwinzer R, Cost GJ, Niemann H. Efficient generation of a biallelic knockout in pigs using zinc-finger nucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108: 12013–12017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Young JJ, Cherone JM, Doyon Y, Ankoudinova I, Faraji FM, Lee AH, Ngo C, Guschin DY, Paschon DE, Miller JC, Zhang L, Rebar EJ, Gregory PD, Urnov FD, Harland RM, Zeitler B. Efficient targeted gene disruption in the soma and germ line of the frog Xenopus tropicalis using engineered zinc-finger nucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108: 7052–7057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yu S, Luo J, Song Z, Ding F, Dai Y, Li N. Highly efficient modification of beta-lactoglobulin (BLG) gene via zinc-finger nucleases in cattle. Cell Res 2011; 21: 1638–1640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Meng X, Noyes MB, Zhu LJ, Lawson ND, Wolfe SA. Targeted gene inactivation in zebrafish using engineered zinc-finger nucleases. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26: 695–701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cai CQ, Doyon Y, Ainley WM, Miller JC, Dekelver RC, Moehle EA, Rock JM, Lee YL, Garrison R, Schulenberg L, Blue R, Worden A, Baker L, Faraji F, Zhang L, Holmes MC, Rebar EJ, Collingwood TN, Rubin-Wilson B, Gregory PD, Urnov FD, Petolino JF. Targeted transgene integration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases. Plant Mol Biol 2009; 69: 699–709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wood AJ, Lo TW, Zeitler B, Pickle CS, Ralston EJ, Lee AH, Amora R, Miller JC, Leung E, Meng X, Zhang L, Rebar EJ, Gregory PD, Urnov FD, Meyer BJ. Targeted genome editing across species using ZFNs and TALENs. Science 2011; 333: 307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bibikova M, Beumer K, Trautman JK, Carroll D. Enhancing gene targeting with designed zinc finger nucleases. Science 2003; 300: 764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fujii W, Kano K, Sugiura K, Naito K. Repeatable construction method for engineered zinc finger nuclease based on overlap extension PCR and TA-cloning. PLoS ONE 2013; 8: e59801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Xu GL, Bestor TH. Cytosine methylation targetted to pre-determined sequences. Nat Genet 1997; 17: 376–378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.McNamara AR, Hurd PJ, Smith AE, Ford KG. Characterisation of site-biased DNA methyltransferases: specificity, affinity and subsite relationships. Nucleic Acids Res 2002; 30: 3818–3830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Carvin CD, Parr RD, Kladde MP. Site-selective in vivo targeting of cytosine-5 DNA methylation by zinc-finger proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31: 6493–6501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Carvin CD, Dhasarathy A, Friesenhahn LB, Jessen WJ, Kladde MP. Targeted cytosine methylation for in vivo detection of protein-DNA interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100: 7743–7748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Akopian A, He J, Boocock MR, Stark WM. Chimeric recombinases with designed DNA sequence recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100: 8688–8691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gordley RM, Smith JD, Gräslund T, Barbas CF., 3rd Evolution of programmable zinc finger-recombinases with activity in human cells. J Mol Biol 2007; 367: 802–813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nomura W, Masuda A, Ohba K, Urabe A, Ito N, Ryo A, Yamamoto N, Tamamura H. Effects of DNA binding of the zinc finger and linkers for domain fusion on the catalytic activity of sequence-specific chimeric recombinases determined by a facile fluorescent system. Biochemistry 2012; 51: 1510–1517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Maeder ML, Thibodeau-Beganny S, Osiak A, Wright DA, Anthony RM, Eichtinger M, Jiang T, Foley JE, Winfrey RJ, Townsend JA, Unger-Wallace E, Sander JD, Müller-Lerch F, Fu F, Pearlberg J, Göbel C, Dassie JP, Pruett-Miller SM, Porteus MH, Sgroi DC, Iafrate AJ, Dobbs D, McCray PB, Jr, Cathomen T, Voytas DF, Joung JK. Rapid “open-source” engineering of customized zinc-finger nucleases for highly efficient gene modification. Mol Cell 2008; 31: 294–301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Carroll D, Morton JJ, Beumer KJ, Segal DJ. Design, construction and in vitro testing of zinc finger nucleases. Nat Protoc 2006; 1: 1329–1341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bhakta MS, Segal DJ. The generation of zinc finger proteins by modular assembly. Methods Mol Biol 2010; 649: 3–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sander JD, Dahlborg EJ, Goodwin MJ, Cade L, Zhang F, Cifuentes D, Curtin SJ, Blackburn JS, Thibodeau-Beganny S, Qi Y, Pierick CJ, Hoffman E, Maeder ML, Khayter C, Reyon D, Dobbs D, Langenau DM, Stupar RM, Giraldez AJ, Voytas DF, Peterson RT, Yeh JR, Joung JK. Selection-free zinc-finger-nuclease engineering by context-dependent assembly (CoDA). Nat Methods 2011; 8: 67–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gupta A, Christensen RG, Rayla AL, Lakshmanan A, Stormo GD, Wolfe SA. An optimized two-finger archive for ZFN-mediated gene targeting. Nat Methods 2012; 9: 588–590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Liu Q, Xia Z, Zhong X, Case CC. Validated zinc finger protein designs for all 16 GNN DNA triplet targets. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 3850–3856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Dreier B, Fuller RP, Segal DJ, Lund CV, Blancafort P, Huber A, Koksch B, Barbas CF., 3rd Development of zinc finger domains for recognition of the 5′-CNN-3′ family DNA sequences and their use in the construction of artificial transcription factors. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 35588–35597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Daniel JM, Spring CM, Crawford HC, Reynolds AB, Baig A. The p120(ctn)-binding partner Kaiso is a bi-modal DNA-binding protein that recognizes both a sequence-specific consensus and methylated CpG dinucleotides. Nucleic Acids Res 2002; 30: 2911–2919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Buck-Koehntop BA, Stanfield RL, Ekiert DC, Martinez-Yamout MA, Dyson HJ, Wilson IA, Wright PE. Molecular basis for recognition of methylated and specific DNA sequences by the zinc finger protein Kaiso. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109: 15229–15234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Carbery ID, Ji D, Harrington A, Brown V, Weinstein EJ, Liaw L, Cui X. Targeted genome modification in mice using zinc-finger nucleases. Genetics 2010; 186: 451–459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mashiko D, Fujihara Y, Satouh Y, Miyata H, Isotani A, Ikawa M. Generation of mutant mice by pronuclear injection of circular plasmid expressing Cas9 and single guided RNA. Sci Rep 2013; 3: 3355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fujii W, Kawasaki K, Sugiura K, Naito K. Efficient generation of large-scale genome-modified mice using gRNA and CAS9 endonuclease. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 41: e187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fujii W, Onuma A, Sugiura K, Naito K. Efficient generation of genome-modified mice via offset-nicking by CRISPR/Cas system. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2014; 445: 791–794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fujii W, Onuma A, Sugiura K, Naito K. One-step generation of phenotype-expressing triple-knockout mice with heritable mutated alleles by the CRISPR/Cas9 system. J Reprod Dev 2014; 60: 324–327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nakamura K, Fujii W, Tsuboi M, Tanihata J, Teramoto N, Takeuchi S, Naito K, Yamanouchi K, Nishihara M. Generation of muscular dystrophy model rats with a CRISPR/Cas system. Sci Rep 2014; 4: 5635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Shen B, Zhang J, Wu H, Wang J, Ma K, Li Z, Zhang X, Zhang P, Huang X. Generation of gene-modified mice via Cas9/RNA-mediated gene targeting. Cell Res 2013; 23: 720–723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wang H, Yang H, Shivalila CS, Dawlaty MM, Cheng AW, Zhang F, Jaenisch R. One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell 2013; 153: 910–918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Yang H, Wang H, Shivalila CS, Cheng AW, Shi L, Jaenisch R. One-step generation of mice carrying reporter and conditional alleles by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell 2013; 154: 1370–1379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tesson L, Usal C, Ménoret S, Leung E, Niles BJ, Remy S, Santiago Y, Vincent AI, Meng X, Zhang L, Gregory PD, Anegon I, Cost GJ. Knockout rats generated by embryo microinjection of TALENs. Nat Biotechnol 2011; 29: 695–696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sung YH, Baek IJ, Kim DH, Jeon J, Lee J, Lee K, Jeong D, Kim JS, Lee HW. Knockout mice created by TALEN-mediated gene targeting. Nat Biotechnol 2013; 31: 23–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bogdanove AJ, Voytas DF. TAL effectors: customizable proteins for DNA targeting. Science 2011; 333: 1843–1846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement
jrd-61-589-s001.pdf (83.8KB, pdf)

Articles from The Journal of Reproduction and Development are provided here courtesy of The Society for Reproduction and Development

RESOURCES