Skip to main content
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics logoLink to Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
. 2015 Jun 25;11(11):2606–2614. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1062189

Practical review of immunizations in adult patients with cancer

Ella J Ariza-Heredia 1,*, Roy F Chemaly 1
PMCID: PMC4685676  PMID: 26110220

Abstract

Compared with the general population, patients with cancer in general are more susceptible to vaccine-preventable infections, either by an increased risk due to the malignancy itself or immunosuppressive treatment. The goal of immunizations in these patients is therefore to provide protection against these infections, and to decrease the number of vulnerable patients who can disseminate these organisms. The proper timing of immunization with cancer treatment is key to achieving better vaccine protection. As the oncology field continues to advance, leading to better quality of life and longer survival, immunization and other aspects of preventive medicine ought to move to the frontline in the care of these patients. Herein, we review the vaccines most clinically relevant to patients with cancer, as well as special cases including vaccines after splenectomy, travel immunization and recommendations for family members.

Keywords: cancer, immunization, infection, prevention, vaccine

General Recommendations

Treatment regimens for oncological diseases have evolved dramatically over the past years and continue to change with the advent of new medications. Clinicians have become increasingly aware of the risk of infection associated with the malignancy itself and/or immunosuppressive therapies, including higher risk for pneumococcus, influenza infection and hepatitis B among others.1-4 In general, adults with oncological diseases should be advised to adhere to standard recommended immunization schedules, but they should avoid live vaccines while on immunosuppressive therapy. Types of immunizations are review in Table 1.

Table 1.

Mechanisms for acquiring immunity from vaccines

Type of Immunization Principle of Action Examples Comments
Non-replicating vaccines Based on toxoid, protein subunits, bacterial, antigens, or immunogenic proteins obtained with recombinant, technology. Tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis, poliomyelitis, hepatitis B, influenza, Haemophilus influenza, pneumococcus, meningococcus Usually requires 3–5 doses; antibody titers diminishes with time
Replicating live attenuated vaccines Produced by disabling the virulent properties of a disease-producing virus or bacterium Measles-mumps-rubella, varicella, intranasal influenza, yellow fever, oral polio, oral typhoid Severe reactions are possible; transmission of live pathogen may occur; most provide immunity with 1 dose
Passive immunization Antibodies are infused to provide short-term protection Varicella Immunoglobulin, hepatitis B immunoglobulin Protection diminishes after weeks or months

The aim of this manuscript is to review the current evidence and to elucidate the practical aspects of vaccination in patients with oncological condition (excluding stem cell transplant recipients) and family members, providing useful immunization recommendations for primary care providers, infectious diseases practitioners and oncologists.

Inactivated vaccines

In general, inactivated vaccines should be given at least 2 weeks before the initiation of chemotherapy or other immunosuppressive therapy to maximize the immune response. Vaccination during chemotherapy or radiation therapy should be avoided because antibody responses are suboptimal. However, vaccination with inactivated vaccines during this period is not harmful and appears to provide sero-protection against some pathogens in some patients.5

Live attenuated vaccines

Live attenuated vaccines should be administered at least 4 weeks prior to immunosuppressive therapy.5,6 The recommendations by the Centers for Disease Control and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), is that vaccination after chemotherapy should not occur until at least 3 months after the discontinuation of the immunosuppressive therapy, except for patients receiving regimens that include anti–B-cell antibodies, in which case, vaccination should be delayed for at least 6 months after treatment.7 However, the treating physician should carefully consider the use of live attenuated vaccines, as some other chemotherapy agents would cause immunosuppression for over 3 months.8,9

Vaccine efficacy

Vaccine efficacy, which is based on the reduction of infection rates in a community, can be very difficult to assess in oncological patients owing to a low incidence of infection (e.g., tetanus) or the seasonality of infection (e.g., influenza).10 Most data on vaccination in cancer patients are from underpowered studies that include patients with different cancers and chemotherapy treatments and that use diverse definitions of vaccine response.6 Classically, vaccine response is measured by assessing pre- and post-vaccination antibody titers (Immunoglobulin G), which should be performed by the same laboratory. The precise methods used to measure vaccine response vary depending on the vaccine as well as the antibody titer cut-off level used to indicate protection.11

Inactivated Vaccines

Influenza vaccine

Cancer patients are known to be at great risk for morbidity secondary to influenza infection, including bacterial pneumonia and respiratory insufficiency,12-14 and mortality, the rate of which ranges from 9% to 33% depending on the underlying malignancy.13 Therefore, influenza vaccination should be offered to all cancer patients except those receiving intensive chemotherapy (e.g., acute leukemia patients receiving induction or consolidation therapy) or anti-B-cell antibodies. Family members and other close contacts of patients with cancer should also be vaccinated against influenza.5 The recommended influenza vaccine in patients with cancer is the intramuscular inactivated vaccine. Intranasal administered live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) is currently not recommended for patients with cancer as there is scarce data on safety. To our knowledge, only one study by Carr et al.15 has evaluated the safety of LAIV in non-neutropenic children with cancer who were classify as mild to moderately immunocompromised, describing the live vaccine to be safe and immunogenic. However as there is a safe non-live vaccine alternative, the current recommendations including ours are to avoid LAIV.

The timing of influenza vaccination in relation to chemotherapy helps to determine the vaccine's serological response. Influenza is a seasonal disease, and waiting to give the vaccine until a few months after chemotherapy may not be an option in some clinical circumstances. For patients who are undergoing or who are about to undergo chemotherapy, the best option may be to administer the vaccine 2 weeks before or 2 weeks after chemotherapy or to administer the vaccine between chemotherapy cycles, and trying to avoid giving the vaccine when the patients' white blood cell counts are at their nadir.16 The concurrent administration of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor at the time of vaccination is not recommended, as it was not found to have a positive effect on the serological response to influenza vaccination.17

The efficacy of the influenza vaccine is typically assessed by measuring hemagglutinin antibody titers. A serum antibody titer of 40 or a 4-fold increase in the hemagglutinin titer is normally considered protective in healthy individuals.18 Using these parameters, several studies have shown that the vaccine response varies depending on the cancer type. For instance, patients with breast cancer19,20 or lung cancer21 have mean vaccine response rates of 66% and 78%, respectively, which are similar to that of the general population. On the other hand, patients with hematological malignancies such as multiple myeloma have much lower vaccine response rates, which range from 19% to 27%.22,23

To improve the immunogenicity of influenza vaccination, researchers have developed new methods of delivering the vaccine, although none has become the standard of care. The first such method is the use of a high-dose vaccine. In one study, Safdar et al. compared adult non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients who received a 45-mcg-influenza vaccine with those who received a 135-mcg vaccine and reported response rates of 40% and 60%, respectively; however, the study population was too small to determine whether this difference was statistically significant.24 The authors also reported no difference in adverse reactions between the regular-dose and high-dose groups,24 although others have reported that the high-dose vaccine is associated with increased local pain and myalgia.25 The second novel method of delivering the influenza vaccine is the 2-shot influenza vaccine. Lo et al. found that the vaccine response rate of patients who received 2 doses (71%) was significantly higher than that of patients who received one dose (42%; p = 0.006).26 In another study, Cheng et al. reported sero-protection rates of 58.3% after one dose and 100% after 2 doses among children who had completed chemotherapy or who were receiving maintenance chemotherapy.27 One of the caveats of the 2-dose vaccination strategy is the compliance rate, which for healthy children is 9.1%–60.1% depending on age; adolescents tend to have lower compliance rates.28,29

Several aspects, including the seasonality and variation of influenza strains as well as difficulty achieving adequate statistical power to identify significant differences between groups, limit researchers' ability to accurately assess the effectiveness of the influenza vaccine. However, a recent meta-analysis described that the rates of lower respiratory disease, hospitalization, and mortality among cancer patients who received the influenza vaccine were significantly lower than those among cancer patients who did not.30 Given this favorable risk-benefit profile, physicians should make every effort to further increase the rate of influenza vaccination.

Pneumococcal vaccine

Streptococcus pneumoniae infection may have serious implications in patients with cancer including a high risk for invasive pneumococcal disease especially for patients with multiple myeloma, lung cancer, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and lymphoma.31,32 However, owing to the low incidence of pneumococcal infection among cancer patients, documenting the effect of the pneumococcal vaccine in terms of reducing the risk for invasive pneumococcal disease is very difficult. Studies have suggested that the pneumococcal vaccine reduces the burden of invasive pneumococcal disease and non-bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia in both healthy adults and HIV-positive patients.33,34 Therefore, as the risk for invasive pneumococcal disease is higher in patients with oncological diseases, pneumococcal vaccine should be offered to all patients with cancer.5 As with the administration of other inactivated vaccines, the administration of the pneumococcal vaccine should be avoided during cycles of intense chemotherapy because of the anticipated poor immunogenic response; ideally, the vaccine should be given before the patient begins treatment.5

The two available pneumococcal vaccines are 1) the pneumococcal 13-valent conjugated vaccine (PCV13), which recently replaced the pneumococcal 7-valent conjugated vaccine (PCV7), and 2) the pneumococcal 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23). Low antibody response to PPSV23 has been described in the general adult population35 as well as in patients with hematologic malignancies, including multiple myeloma and lymphoma, reporting protective antibody levels in only 33%–43% of individuals.23,36,37 In a double-blind trial that compared a single dose of PCV13 with PPSV23 in 831 pneumococcal vaccine naive adults 60–64 years of age, PCV13 achieved a greater functional immune response than PPSV23 for the majority of serotypes covered by PCV13.35

In search for a better immunogenic response, studies of patients with Hodgkin disease38 and HIV showed that sequential vaccination with the conjugated vaccine (PCV7) followed by PPSV23 1 year later elicited functional anti-pneumococcal responses for many of the serotypes that were significantly greater than those achieved using the polysaccharide vaccine alone.39,40 The authors concluded that the conjugate vaccine primes the immune system to provide an antibody response to the polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine. In 2013, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention expanded their recommendations for the pneumococcal vaccination of unvaccinated, immunocompromised patients age 19 years or more to include the administration of PCV13 followed by the administration of PPSV23 8 weeks later (Table 2).33 In the case of patients after stem cell transplant, the recommendation is to use repeated doses of the pneumococcus-conjugated vaccine to maintain durable responses.6 Repeated doses of PPSV23 administered at intervals of less than 5 years result in lower antibody levels in the general population; this phenomenon is known as hypo-responsiveness and is caused by the depletion of polysaccharide-specific B cells.41

Table 2.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Recommendations for pneumococcal vaccination in immunocompromised patients age 19-64 years and asplenic patients33

Patient Vaccination Status Recommendations
Unvaccinated A single dose of PCV13 should be given, followed by a single dose of PPSV23 at least 8 weeks later.
At least 1 dose of PPSV23 received A single dose of PCV13 should be given if 1 or more years have passed after the last dose of PPSV23.
Additional doses of PPSV23 required The first additional dose of PPSV23 should be given at least 8 weeks after the most recent dose of PCV13 and at least 5 years after the most recent dose of PPSV23.

Abbreviations: PCV13 (pneumococcal conjugated vaccine), PPSV23 (pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine).

Earlier randomized studies of pneumococcal vaccination had been underpowered to evaluate the efficacy against community-acquired pneumonia secondary to the vaccine strains;34 however a recent multicenter study including almost 85,000 participants 65 years or older evaluating the effectiveness of PCV13 demonstrated how the vaccine offers moderate protection against the most common forms of pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia in healthy elderly people. Over 42,500 senior citizens were vaccinated with the PCV13 from September 2008 to the end of January 2010 and the same number received a placebo. In their analysis of infections due to vaccine-type strains, community-acquired pneumonia occurred in 49 and 90 adults in the PCV13 and the placebo groups, respectively (vaccine efficacy, 45.6%; 95.2% confidence interval [CI], 21.8 to 62.5) and invasive pneumococcal disease occurred in 7 and 28 adults in the PCV13 and the placebo groups, respectively (vaccine efficacy, 75.0%; 95% CI, 41.4 to 90.8).42 The results of this study are encouraging and maybe applied to mild to moderately immunocompromised patients.

Tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis vaccine

Bordetella pertussis causes a highly contagious upper respiratory infection known as whooping cough. Rare but serious complications can include pneumonia, encephalopathy, and seizures have been reported,43 and immunocompromised patients are vulnerable to serious, often fatal, complications.44 Moreover, in recent years, there has been a considerable increase in the cases of pertussis, with reports from California in 2010 of over 9,000 cases and 10 infant deaths.45 The evaluation of serological evidence of immunity in patients with cancer has demonstrated a waning of immunity for Tetanus, diphtheria and acellular pertussis (Tdap) after chemotherapy. In a report by Hammarstrom et al. in patients after autologous transplantation, less than 50% of subjects had antibodies against tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis.46 Therefore, given that Tdap immunity may diminish over time, and the recent increase in pertussis cases,45 a booster Tdap vaccination should be considered for patients who have completed chemotherapy.5,43

Hepatitis B vaccine

In patients who receive cytotoxic chemotherapy, inactivated Hepatitis B virus (HBV) may reactivate and result in varying degrees of liver damage. The rate of HBV reactivation in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy can be as high as 47%.47 Furthermore, immunosuppressed patients are more likely to remain chronically infected with HBV; among cancer patients, the rate of chronic HBV infection ranges from 18% to 26%, and HBV infection–related mortality up to 5%.48,49 In addition, the loss of pre-existing immunity to HBV has been described in up to 50% of patients who have undergone stem cell transplant. In patients who have received chemotherapy,50 especially anti–B-cell antibodies such as rituximab, the loss of such immunity can result in virus re-emergence with or without signs of hepatitis.51 Therefore, HBV status should be determined, and the immunization of susceptible patients strongly considered, at the time of cancer diagnosis.47 The HBV vaccine response rate of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy was reported in a study by Weitberg et al. to be more than 70% of individuals, which has been described as adequate.52

Meningococcal vaccine

Patients with cancer should follow the ACIP recommendations for meningococcal vaccine including adolescents, individuals with persistent complement component deficiency (e.g., C5–C9, properidin, factor H, or factor D) and functional or anatomic asplenia, and for adolescents with HIV infection. Similar to other non-live vaccines, meningococcal vaccine should be offered either prior to chemotherapy or once patients' immune system has recovered.53 Patients who underwent radiation to the spleen and are considered to have functional asplenia54 (i.e. if the patient has received doses greater than 30 Gy during radiation) should also be offered meningococcal vaccine following meningococcal vaccine recommendations for splenectomized patients (please see below recommendations for splenectomized patients). In terms of immune responses to the vaccine, a study by Yu et al. in pediatric patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia evaluated antibody response to meningococcal C-conjugate vaccine after chemotherapy and showed variable responses which are related to proximity to chemotherapy and total number of B cells.55

Human papillomavirus vaccine

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is associated with the development of genital warts, anogenital cancers (including cervical, vaginal, vulvar, and anal), and oropharyngeal cancer. The ACIP and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that HPV vaccination should be routinely given to females and males aged 11 years or 12 years old. For those not vaccinated at the target age, catch-up vaccination is recommended up to age 26 years.56 The presence of immunosuppression is not a contraindication to HPV vaccination, and current recommendations are to follow the general vaccination schedule by the ACIP.5 However, the immune response may be less robust in the immunocompromised patient.57

Hepatitis A vaccine

Immunization against Hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection should be offered to patients with cancer traveling to countries endemic for this virus, as well as for household or close contacts with an individual with an acute HAV infection, men who have sex with men, illicit drug users, populations or communities that have high endemic rates of HAV infections (also discussed in the Travel section), or are at risk of HAV outbreaks and household or close contact with children adopted from endemic countries for HAV. Primary immunization can be achieved with one dose of HAV vaccine with a booster dose given 6 to 36 months later.58,59

The immunological response to HAV vaccine in immunocompromised patients with cancer has not been systematically assessed. In a study including solid organ transplant recipients, Günther et al. evaluated sero-conversion following 2 doses of the HAV vaccine in kidney and liver transplant recipients and found significant sero-conversion rates in 72% and 97% of patients respectively, versus 100% in healthy controls. However, after 2 years, immunity persisted in 26%–59% of the transplant recipients vs. 100% of the healthy controls;60 thus reassessment of immunity may be indicated later on in specific situations.

Live Attenuated Vaccines

Unlike inactivated vaccines, live attenuated vaccines may pose a risk of replication of the virus after administration, and live vaccines can actually induce infection in immunocompromised patients.6 Therefore, physicians should carefully evaluate and discuss these vaccines' risk-benefit profile with their patients before making a recommendation regarding their use. Live attenuated vaccines could be administered at least 4 weeks before the initiation of highly immunosuppressive therapy and at least 3 months after the completion of chemotherapy; the timing of vaccination after chemotherapy may be much later depending on the immunosuppressive agents used.8

Varicella and zoster vaccines

Varicella zoster virus (VZV) commonly causes chickenpox in children, but it may also be seen in adults, in whom it generally can cause morbidity and mortality, especially in immunocompromised patients. The most common presentation is referred to as shingles, and other rare complications include meningoencephalitis, cerebellitis, herpes zoster ophthalmicus, and Ramsay Hunt syndrome.30

Although the risk for varicella zoster due to vaccination is low,61 varicella infection associated with the vaccine can occur in patients with cancer, and the infection ranges from mild to moderately severe.62 To our knowledge, death has been reported in 2 different instances, one of a child who received the vaccine while undergoing consolidation chemotherapy,63 and a recent report by Bhalla et al. of disseminated, fatal infection in an adult 4 years after transplantation and who had been diagnosed with a new low-grade lymphoma.64

Therefore, the need for varicella vaccination after chemotherapy should be evaluated with caution. Vaccine seroprotection has been evaluated in children with leukemia in remission by Leung et al. who reported seroconversion rates to Varicella vaccine (Varivax, Merck, USA) of 88% after the first dose and 98% after the second dose.62

In terms of Zoster vaccine (Zostavax, Merck, USA), this vaccine is recommended as a 1-time vaccination in individuals aged 60 years or older, and although it is clear that immunosuppression increases the risk of herpes zoster, there is a paucity of studies aimed at understanding the benefits and risks of administering this vaccine in this special population.59 Tseng et al. recently reported how older patients who receive the zoster vaccine were likely to continue to derive its benefits even if they become immunosuppressed; however, the study was not able to determine zoster vaccine safety or effectiveness in cancer patients who received zoster vaccine less than 60 days before beginning chemotherapy.65,66 This study emphasizes the need to vaccinate immunocompetent patients older than 60 years of age, as currently no recommendations can be done about Zostavax vaccination in immunocompromised individuals.

Measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine

Morbidity and mortality rates by measles can be high in patients with cancer.67,68 In a study in Britain over 11 years including 1043 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia; 51 children (4.9%) died while in first remission, and 15 (29.4%) of these deaths were due to measles or its complications: 10 cases of pneumonia, and 5 cases of encephalitis.69 Furthermore, Feldman et al. showed declining rates of antibody seropositivity of previously immunized children for measles, mumps, and rubella between 64%– 77%, after receiving treatment for acute leukemia or acute lymphoid leukemia,70 emphasizing the need to reevaluate measles immunity after chemotherapy.

Recent outbreaks of measles have been reported in the United States and overseas.71 Although the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine is live attenuated and should not be administered to severely immunocompromised patients, it might be considered in patients after chemotherapy that are at an increased risk for measles. With reference to vaccine response, Patel et al. reported antibody response to MMR vaccine in more than 94% of children who had completed standard chemotherapy for acute leukemia, without adverse reactions.72

Special Considerations in Splenectomized Patients

Anatomic or functional asplenia is frequently encountered in patients with cancer. Patients with asplenia have an increased risk for fulminant bacteremia and septicemia caused by encapsulated bacteria, which is associated with a high mortality.73 In a population-based study in Sweden that included 20,000 patients who underwent splenectomy between 1970 and 2009, the risk of hospitalization or death from sepsis among these patients who underwent splenectomy for a hematologic malignancy was higher than that among patients who underwent spleen removal due to trauma.74

Patients should undergo vaccination at least 2 weeks prior to an elective splenectomy.75 For patients who receive vaccines after splenectomy, the antibody response to the immunizations should be measured to determine the need for booster doses, as studies in children with Hodgkin disease showed poor antibody response to vaccines given after splenectomy.76 Compared with those of healthy individuals, the immune systems of patients with hyposplenia can mount only a small protective antibody response to polysaccharide antigens, which may result in vaccine failure. Therefore, conjugated vaccines are preferred in these patients.

The current recommended vaccines in patients immediately before or after splenectomy are vaccines against pneumococcus, Neisseria meningitidis (meningococcus), and Haemophilus influenzae type b.

Pneumococcal vaccine

Recommendations for pneumococcus vaccine for splenectomized patients are depicted in Table 2. Adults who have undergone splenectomy should be revaccinated with one dose of the pneumococcus polysaccharide vaccine 5 years after the initial immunization.77

Meningococcal vaccine

In splenectomy patients receiving meningococcal vaccination, the immunity provided by the conjugate vaccine (Menveo, Novartis, USA, or Menactra, Sanofi-Pasteur, France) is expected to be higher and longer lasting than that provided by the polysaccharide quadrivalent meningococcal vaccine (Menomune A/C/Y/W-135, Sanofi-Pasteur, France). Although the quadrivalent meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine is the only meningococcal vaccine approved by the US. Food and Drug Administration for asplenic patients age 56 years or more,78,79 patients who have undergone splenectomy—even those age 56 years or more—should receive the quadrivalent conjugate meningococcal vaccine.80 This recommendation is supported by data showing that in individuals who previously received a meningococcal conjugate vaccine, antibody responses to a subsequent dose of the same vaccine were higher than those to a subsequent dose of the polysaccharide quadrivalent vaccine.81 Two new serogroup B meningococcal vaccines (Bexsero, Novartis, USA, and Trumenba, Pfizer, USA) that have been approved recently by the US. Food and Drug Administration for patients 10 to 25 years old should also be considered in asplenic patients.

Revaccination with conjugated meningococcal vaccine every 5 years is recommended for previously vaccinated adults who remain at an increased risk for infection (e.g., adults with anatomic or functional asplenia or persistent complement component deficiencies).

Haemophilus influenza b vaccine

Asplenic patients and those planned to undergo elective splenectomy should receive one dose of Haemophilus influenza b vaccine (Hib) or any Hib-containing vaccine. The Hib conjugate vaccine has been shown to be immunogenic in both children and adults who have undergone splenectomy.82,83 Data on revaccination against Hib are not available.

Other Considerations

Travel

Immunocompromised cancer patients who wish to travel outside the United States should be referred to a travel medicine specialist who is familiar with their care and medications. Depending on the area the patient plans to visit, the pre-travel visit should include a discussion about the vaccines the patient should receive before departing (i.e., Hepatitis A, typhoid fever, polio), and steps the patient can take to reduce the risk of contracting non–vaccine-preventable illnesses such as malaria, and food- or water-borne illnesses.59

Hepatitis A, intramuscular/subcutaneous polio and Vi capsular polysaccharide (ViCPS) are inactive vaccines, therefore considered safe in immunocompromised patients (see Hepatitis A section). Oral polio and oral typhoid vaccines (Ty21a) are live-attenuated vaccines and should not be administered in immunocompromised patients. If time does not permit adequate vaccination (e.g., patient presents 2 weeks prior to travel), consider administering gamma globulin alone or in combination with hepatitis A vaccine.84

Patients actively receiving chemotherapy should be discouraged from traveling to high-infection-risk areas such as regions where yellow fever is endemic, locations with active disease outbreaks, and regions with limited health care facilities.85

Household contacts

Patients' family members should remain up-to-date with their vaccinations as per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices guidelines. However, some caveats regarding vaccination in households that include immunocompromised patients should be considered. In general, inactivated vaccines, the MMR vaccine, and vaccine against yellow fever are safe. Live attenuated zoster vaccine (Zostavax, Merck USA) and varicella vaccine (Varivax, Merck Inc., USA) are also safe; however, immunocompromised patients should avoid contact with persons who develop skin lesions after receipt of these vaccines until such lesions clear or crust. Other vaccines require caution on the part of the patient and household members. For example, patients with severe neutropenia and those who have received a stem cell transplant should avoid contact with household members who have recently received the nasal influenza vaccine. Also, as oral rotavirus vaccine is live attenuated and the virus may persists in feces, thus immunocompromised patients should avoid contact with the soiled diapers of infants who have received the rotavirus vaccine for 4–6 weeks. The oral polio vaccine should not be administered to household members. There is not enough data for oral typhoid or cholera vaccine to make any recommendations.

Compliance

Common barriers to vaccination include a lack of access to medical care and patients' concerns about vaccine safety. Immunization rates remain low in patients with cancer. In one survey study conducted at a university-based outpatient cancer treatment clinic, of the 204 cancer patients who completed the survey, 30% had never received an influenza vaccine, 56% had never received a pneumococcal vaccine, and only 7% remembered their oncologist asking or informing them about vaccination.86 Other studies have reported low vaccination rates among splenectomized patients; however, these rates varied depending on the vaccine: whereas the rate of pneumococcal vaccination was 85.4%, those of Hib vaccination and meningococcal vaccination were only 39.4% and 32.3%, respectively.87,88 As patients with cancer are in constant contact with the healthcare system and have great trust in their healthcare providers, continuous efforts to evaluate and improve vaccination compliance are highly encouraged. This should be a joint mission between oncologist and primary care provider, in consultation with infectious diseases physician and pharmacist for complicated cases.

Conclusions

Patients with oncological diagnosis and undergoing chemotherapy, have in general higher risks of infection. Many of these infections can be prevented by vaccinations (Table 3). As cancer treatments improve, eliciting better outcomes, practitioners are strongly encouraged to discuss vaccinations and other aspects of preventive medicine with their patients. New vaccines are in development including recombinant CMV vaccine, inactivated zoster vaccine that might give new possibilities to prevent these specific and common infections in immunocompromised hosts.

Table 3.

Practical vaccination recommendations in patients with cancer

  Dosing Schedule Considerations Contraindications
Influenza Seasonal Administration of indicated inactivated vaccines 2 or more weeks prior to chemotherapy is preferred. Severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) after previous dose of any influenza vaccine; or to a vaccine component, including egg protein
Pneumococcus Recommended Table 2 Severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) after a previous dose or to a vaccine component, including to any vaccine containing diphtheria toxin
Td/Tdap Booster Replace a Td booster for Tdap An immediate anaphylactic reaction. Encephalopathy occurring within 7 days following DTP vaccination
Hepatitis B 3 doses at 0,1 and 6 months All patients should be screened for immunity, and vaccinated as needed. Consider antibody measurement after last vaccine. History of hypersensitivity to yeast or any vaccine component
Hib Recommended for splenectomized patients. Others, usual recommendations If patient is unimmunized, a dose of Hib should be offered after chemotherapy Some of the combined Hib vaccines, such Hiberix, ActHib might contain natural rubber latex, which may cause allergy in latex sensitive persons.
Meningococcus Splenectomized patients. Others, usual recommendations For international travelers, vaccination is recommended for those visiting the parts of sub-Saharan Africa known as the “meningitis belt” during the dry season (December–June). Vaccination with MenACWY, MPSV4, or Hib-MenCY-TT is contraindicated among persons known to have a severe allergic reaction to any component of the vaccine, including diphtheria or tetanus toxoid
Hepatitis A Usual recommendations (see text). Consider antibody testing in case of future exposure after 2-3 years post-vaccination. Contraindicated if history of previous allergy to the vaccine or a component of the vaccine
MMR CAUTION May be considered in specific cases at least 3-6 months after chemotherapy (i.e. children not vaccinated or epidemiological situation). Recommend checking antibody level prior. Contraindicated while on chemotherapy or radiotherapy
Varicella/Zoster CAUTION May be considered in children not previously vaccinated, at least 3-6 months after chemotherapy is finished (see text). There is no data for Zoster vaccination after chemotherapy. Contraindicated if given <4 weeks of starting chemotherapy .No data is available after chemotherapy

Abbreviations: Td/Tdap (Tetanus diphtheria/ Tetanus/diphtheria/acellular pertussis), DTP (diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis), MMR (Measles, mumps and rubella), Hib (Heamophilus b conjugated vaccine), Hiberix (GlaxoSmithKline, England), ActHib (Sanofi-Pasteur, France).

Several questions remain unanswered including evaluation of immunogenicity on patients undergoing new target chemotherapy agents, and the need for long-term boosters. Prospective-multicenter clinical trials need to be performed to better assess the efficacy of vaccination, evaluation of immunogenicity in patients undergoing new-targeted chemotherapy, as well as the establishment of a registry to provide safety data.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

R.F.C. has received research funding from GlaxoSmithKline. E.J. A-H. declares no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Mr. Joseph Munch, Scientific publications, for his editorial revision of the article.

References

  • 1.Meisel R, Toschke AM, Heiligensetzer C, Dilloo D, Laws HJ, von Kries R. Increased risk for invasive pneumococcal diseases in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Haematol 2007; 137:457-60; PMID:17488489; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2007.06601.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wong A, Marrie TJ, Garg S, Kellner JD, Tyrrell GJ, Group S. Increased risk of invasive pneumococcal disease in haematological and solid-organ malignancies. Epidemiol Infect 2010; 138:1804-10; PMID:20429967; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1017/S0950268810000919 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chemaly RF, Vigil KJ, Saad M, Vilar-Compte D, Cornejo-Juarez P, Perez-Jimenez C, Mubarak S, Salhab M, Jiang Y, Granwehr B, et al.. A multicenter study of pandemic influenza A (H1N1) infection in patients with solid tumors in 3 countries: early therapy improves outcomes. Cancer 2012; 118:4627-33; PMID:22359314; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/cncr.27447 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kwon HJ, Lee JW, Chung NG, Cho B, Kim HK, Kang JH. Assessment of serologic immunity to diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis after treatment of Korean pediatric hematology and oncology patients. J Korean Med Sci 2012; 27:78-83; PMID:22219618; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3346/jkms.2012.27.1.78 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rubin LG, Levin MJ, Ljungman P, Davies EG, Avery R, Tomblyn M, Bousvaros A, Dhanireddy S, Sung L, Keyserling H, et al.. 2013 IDSA clinical practice guideline for vaccination of the immunocompromised host. Clin Infect Dis 2014; 58:309-18; PMID:24421306; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/cid/cit816 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ljungman P. Vaccination of immunocompromised patients. Clin Microbiol Infect 2012; 18(Suppl 5):93-9; PMID:23051059; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03971.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Berglund A, Willen L, Grodeberg L, Skattum L, Hagberg H, Pauksens K. The response to vaccination against influenza A(H1N1) 2009, seasonal influenza and Streptococcus pneumoniae in adult outpatients with ongoing treatment for cancer with and without rituximab. Acta Incol 2014; 53:1212-20; PMID:24865118; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3109/0284186X.2014.914243 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bracci L, Schiavoni G, Sistigu A, Belardelli F. Immune-based mechanisms of cytotoxic chemotherapy: implications for the design of novel and rationale-based combined treatments against cancer. Cell Death Different 2014; 21:15-25; PMID:23787994; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/cdd.2013.67 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Schwarzberg AB, Stover EH, Sengupta T, Michelini A, Vincitore M, Baden LR, Kulke MH. Selective lymphopenia and opportunistic infections in neuroendocrine tumor patients receiving temozolomide. Cancer Invest 2007; 25:249-55; PMID:17612935; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/07357900701206380 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kotton CN, Poznansky MC. Vaccination of oncology patients: an effective tool and an opportunity not to be missed. Oncologist 2012; 17:1-2; PMID:22240542; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Balmer P, Cant AJ, Borrow R. Anti-pneumococcal antibody titre measurement: what useful information does it yield? J Clin Pathol 2007; 60:345-50; PMID:16950855; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1136/jcp.2006.041210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Couch RB, Englund JA, Whimbey E. Respiratory viral infections in immunocompetent and immunocompromised persons. Am J Med 1997; 102:2-9; discussion 25–6; PMID:10868136; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/S0002-9343(97)00003-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Schepetiuk S, Papanaoum K, Qiao M. Spread of influenza A virus infection in hospitalised patients with cancer. Aust N Z J Med 1998; 28:475-6; PMID:9777122; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1998.tb02089.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Advisory Committee on Immunization P . Prevention and control of influenza with vaccines: interim recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices (ACIP), 2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2013; 62:356; PMID:23657110 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Carr S, Allison KJ, Van De Velde LA, Zhang K, English EY, Iverson A, Daw NC, Howard SC, Navid F, Rodriguez-Galindo C, et al.. Safety and immunogenicity of live attenuated and inactivated influenza vaccines in children with cancer. J Infect Dis 2011; 204:1475-82; PMID:21949042; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/infdis/jir561 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Matsuzaki A, Suminoe A, Koga Y, Kinukawa N, Kusuhara K, Hara T. Immune response after influenza vaccination in children with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2005; 45:831-7; PMID:16007602; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/pbc.20470 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pauksen K, Linde A, Hammarstrom V, Sjolin J, Carneskog J, Jonsson G, Oberga G, Engelmann H, Ljungman P. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor as immunomodulating factor together with influenza vaccination in stem cell transplant patients. Clin Infect Dis 2000; 30:342-8; PMID:10671339; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1086/313663 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Molinari NA, Ortega-Sanchez IR, Messonnier ML, Thompson WW, Wortley PM, Weintraub E, Bridges CB. The annual impact of seasonal influenza in the US: measuring disease burden and costs. Vaccine 2007; 25:5086-96; PMID:17544181; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.03.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Brydak LB, Guzy J, Starzyk J, Machala M, Gozdz SS. Humoral immune response after vaccination against influenza in patients with breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 2001; 9:65-8; PMID:11147146; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s005200000186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Meerveld-Eggink A, de Weerdt O, van der Velden AM, Los M, van der Velden AW, Stouthard JM, Nijziel MR, Westerman M, Beeker A, van Beek R, et al.. Response to influenza virus vaccination during chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2011; 22:2031-5; PMID:21303799; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/annonc/mdq728 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Anderson H, Petrie K, Berrisford C, Charlett A, Thatcher N, Zambon M. Seroconversion after influenza vaccination in patients with lung cancer. Br J Cancer 1999; 80:219-20; PMID:10389999; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690342 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Goossen GM, Kremer LC, van de Wetering MD. Influenza vaccination in children being treated with chemotherapy for cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009. Apr 15;(2):CD006484. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/14651858.CD006484.pub2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Robertson JD, Nagesh K, Jowitt SN, Dougal M, Anderson H, Mutton K, Zambon M, Scarffe JH. Immunogenicity of vaccination against influenza, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae type B in patients with multiple myeloma. Br J Cancer 2000; 82:1261-5; PMID:10755398; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1054/bjoc.1999.1088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Safdar A, Rodriguez MA, Fayad LE, Rodriguez GH, Pro B, Wang M, Romaguera JE, Goy AH, Hagemeister FB, McLaughlin P, et al.. Dose-related safety and immunogenicity of baculovirus-expressed trivalent influenza vaccine: a double-blind, controlled trial in adult patients with non-Hodgkin B cell lymphoma. J Infect Dis 2006; 194:1394-7; PMID:17054068; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1086/508493 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Couch RB, Winokur P, Brady R, Belshe R, Chen WH, Cate TR, Sigurdardottir B, Hoeper A, Graham IL, Edelman R, et al.. Safety and immunogenicity of a high dosage trivalent influenza vaccine among elderly subjects. Vaccine 2007; 25:7656-63; PMID:17913310; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.08.042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lo W, Whimbey E, Elting L, Couch R, Cabanillas F, Bodey G. Antibody response to a two-dose influenza vaccine regimen in adult lymphoma patients on chemotherapy. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1993; 12:778-82; PMID:8307050; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/BF02098469 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cheng FW, Chan PK, Leung WK, Lee V, Shing MK, Yeung AC, Li CK. Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 vaccine in paediatric oncology patients: one dose or two doses? Br J Haematol 2011; 154:408-9; PMID:21488856; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08501.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Centers for Disease C, Prevention . Influenza vaccination coverage among children aged 6 months–18 years - eight immunization information system sentinel sites, United States, 2008-09 influenza season. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2009; 58:1059-62; PMID:19798018 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pabst LJ, Chaves SS, Weinbaum C. Trends in compliance with two-dose influenza vaccine recommendations among children aged 6 months through 8 years. Vaccine 2013; 31:3116-20; PMID:23684827; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.04.080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cheuk DK, Chiang AK, Lee TL, Chan GC, Ha SY. Vaccines for prophylaxis of viral infections in patients with hematological malignancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011. Mar 16;(3):CD006505. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/14651858.CD006505.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lipsky BA, Boyko EJ, Inui TS, Koepsell TD. Risk factors for acquiring pneumococcal infections. Arch Intern Med 1986; 146:2179-85; PMID:3778047; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1001/archinte.1986.00360230105016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Itala M, Helenius H, Nikoskelainen J, Remes K. Infections and serum IgG levels in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Eur J Haematol 1992; 48:266-70; PMID:1644158; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1600-0609.1992.tb01805.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Centers for Disease C, Prevention . Use of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine for adults with immunocompromising conditions: recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices (ACIP). MMWR Morb Mort Wkly Rep 2012; 61:816-9; PMID:23051612 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.French N, Gordon SB, Mwalukomo T, White SA, Mwafulirwa G, Longwe H, Mwaiponya M, Zijlstra EE, Molyneux ME, Gilks CF. A trial of a 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in HIV-infected adults. N Engl J Med 2010; 362:812-22; PMID:20200385; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1056/NEJMoa0903029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Jackson LA, Gurtman A, van Cleeff M, Jansen KU, Jayawardene D, Devlin C, Scott DA, Emini EA, Gruber WC, Schmoele-Thoma B. Immunogenicity and safety of a 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine compared to a 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in pneumococcal vaccine-naive adults. Vaccine 2013; 31:3577-84; PMID:23688526; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.04.085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hinge M, Ingels HA, Slotved HC, Molle I. Serologic response to a 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine administered prior to autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma. APMIS 2012; 120:935-40; PMID:23009118; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2012.02922.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sinisalo M, Vilpo J, Itala M, Vakevainen M, Taurio J, Aittoniemi J. Antibody response to 7-valent conjugated pneumococcal vaccine in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Vaccine 2007; 26:82-7; PMID:18053620; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.10.053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chan CY, Molrine DC, George S, Tarbell NJ, Mauch P, Diller L, Shamberger RC, Phillips NR, Goorin A, Ambrosino DM. Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine primes for antibody responses to polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine after treatment of Hodgkin's disease. J Infect Dis 1996; 173:256-8; PMID:8537671; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/infdis/173.1.256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Greenberg RN, Gurtman A, Frenck RW, Strout C, Jansen KU, Trammel J, Scott DA, Emini EA, Gruber WC, Schmoele-Thoma B. Sequential administration of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in pneumococcal vaccine-naive adults 60-64 years of age. Vaccine 2014; 32:2364-74; PMID:24606865; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Glesby MJ, Watson W, Brinson C, Greenberg RN, Lalezari JP, Skiest D, et al.. Immunogenicity and safety of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in HIVinfected adults previously vaccinated with pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine. J Infect Dis 2015. Jul 1; 212(1):18-27 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pollard AJ, Perrett KP, Beverley PC. Maintaining protection against invasive bacteria with protein-polysaccharide conjugate vaccines. Nat Rev Immunol 2009; 9:213-20; PMID:19214194; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nri2494 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bonten MJ, Huijts SM, Bolkenbaas M, Webber C, Patterson S, Gault S, van Werkhoven CH, van Deursen AM, Sanders EA, Verheij TJ, et al.. Polysaccharide conjugate vaccine against pneumococcal pneumonia in adults. N Engl J Med 2015; 372:1114-25; PMID:25785969; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1056/NEJMoa1408544 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Florax A, Ehlert K, Becker K, Vormoor J, Groll AH. Bordetella pertussis respiratory infection following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: time for universal vaccination? Bone Marrow Transplant 2006; 38:639-40; PMID:16964268; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705495 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Senturk E, Sen S, Telli M. Empyema due to Bordetella pertussis in an adult patient with lung cancer. Arch De Bronconeumol 2012; 48:263-4; PMID:22503592; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.arbr.2012.04.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Winter K, Glaser C, Watt J, Harriman K, Centers for Disease C, Prevention . Pertussis epidemic–California, 2014. MMWR Morb Mort Wkly Rep 2014; 63:1129-32; PMID:25474033 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hammarstrom V, Pauksen K, Bjorkstrand B, Simonsson B, Oberg G, Ljungman P. Tetanus immunity in autologous bone marrow and blood stem cell transplant recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant 1998; 22:67-71; PMID:9678798; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/sj.bmt.1701289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Torres HA, Davila M. Reactivation of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus in patients with cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2012; 9:156-66; PMID:22271089; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lok AS, Liang RH, Chiu EK, Wong KL, Chan TK, Todd D. Reactivation of hepatitis B virus replication in patients receiving cytotoxic therapy. Report of a prospective study. Gastroenterology 1991; 100:182-8; PMID:1983820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Yeo W, Chan PK, Zhong S, Ho WM, Steinberg JL, Tam JS, Hui P, Leung NW, Zee B, Johnson PJ. Frequency of hepatitis B virus reactivation in cancer patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy: a prospective study of 626 patients with identification of risk factors. J Med Virol 2000; 62:299-307; PMID:11055239; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/1096-9071(200011)62:3%3c299::AID-JMV1%3e3.0.CO;2-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zignol M, Peracchi M, Tridello G, Pillon M, Fregonese F, D'Elia R, Zanesco L, Cesaro S. Assessment of humoral immunity to poliomyelitis, tetanus, hepatitis B, measles, rubella, and mumps in children after chemotherapy. Cancer 2004; 101:635-41; PMID:15274078; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/cncr.20384 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Idilman R, Arat M. Evaluation and management of hepatitis B virus infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: before and after transplantation. Exp Rev Anti-Infect Ther 2011; 9:641-52; PMID:21819330; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1586/eri.11.79 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Weitberg AB, Weitzman SA, Watkins E, Hinkle C, O'Rourke S, Dienstag JL. Immunogenicity of hepatitis B vaccine in oncology patients receiving chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 1985; 3:718-22; PMID:3158725 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Centers for Disease C, Prevention . Recommendation of the advisory committee on immunization practices (ACIP) for use of quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MenACWY-D) among children aged 9 through 23 months at increased risk for invasive meningococcal disease. MMWR Morb Mort Wkly Rep 2011; 60:1391-2; PMID:21993344 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Coleman CN, McDougall IR, Dailey MO, Ager P, Bush S, Kaplan HS. Functional hyposplenia after splenic irradiation for Hodgkin's disease. Ann Intern Med 1982; 96:44-7; PMID:7053701; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.7326/0003-4819-96-1-44 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Yu JW, Borkowski A, Danzig L, Reiter S, Kavan P, Mazer BD. Immune response to conjugated meningococcal C vaccine in pediatric oncology patients. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2007; 49:918-23; PMID:17366523; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/pbc.21174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Markowitz LE, Dunne EF, Saraiya M, Chesson HW, Curtis CR, Gee J, Bocchini JA Jr, Unger ER; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) . Human papillomavirus vaccination: recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep 2014; 63:1-30; PMID:25167164 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Levin MJ, Moscicki AB, Song LY, Fenton T, Meyer WA 3rd, Read JS, Handelsman EL, Nowak B, Sattler CA, Saah A, et al.. Safety and immunogenicity of a quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, and 18) vaccine in HIV-infected children 7 to 12 years old. J Acquir Immune Defici Syndr 2010; 55:197-204; PMID:20574412; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181de8d26 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gardner P, Eickhoff T, Poland GA, Gross P, Griffin M, LaForce FM, Schaffner W, Strikas R. Adult immunizations. Ann Intern Med 1996; 124:35-40; PMID:7503476; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.7326/0003-4819-124-1_Part_1-199601010-00007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Mutsch M, Spicher VM, Gut C, Steffen R. Hepatitis A virus infections in travelers, 1988-2004. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 42:490-7; PMID:16421793; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1086/499816 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Gunther M, Stark K, Neuhaus R, Reinke P, Schroder K, Bienzle U. Rapid decline of antibodies after hepatitis A immunization in liver and renal transplant recipients. Transplantation 2001; 71:477-9; PMID:11233913; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1097/00007890-200102150-00023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Morales-Castillo ME, Alvarez-Munoz MT, Solorzano-Santos F, Gonzalez-Robledo R, Jasso-Gutierrez L, Munoz-Hernandez O. Live varicella vaccine in both immunocompromised and healthy children. Arch Med Res 2000; 31:85-7; PMID:10767486; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/S0188-4409(99)00080-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Leung TF, Li CK, Hung EC, Chan PK, Mo CW, Wong RP, Chik KW. Immunogenicity of a two-dose regime of varicella vaccine in children with cancers. Eur J Haematol 2004; 72:353-7; PMID:15059071; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2004.00216.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Caniza MA, Hunger SP, Schrauder A, Valsecchi MG, Pui CH, Masera G, Members of International Study Group of Childhood ALL ( “Ponte di Legno Working Group”) . The controversy of varicella vaccination in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2012; 58:12-6; PMID:20848637; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/pbc.22759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Bhalla P, Forrest GN, Gershon M, Zhou Y, Chen J, LaRussa P, Steinberg S, Gershon AA. Disseminated, persistent, and fatal infection due to the vaccine strain of varicella-zoster virus in an adult following stem cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis 2015; 60:1068-74; PMID:25452596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Tseng HF, Tartof S, Harpaz R, Luo Y, Sy LS, Hetcher RC, Jacobsen SJ. Vaccination against zoster remains effective in older adults who later undergo chemotherapy. Clin Infect Dis 2014; 59:913-9; PMID:25097079; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/cid/ciu498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Harpaz R, Ortega-Sanchez IR, Seward JF, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices Centers for Disease C, Prevention . Prevention of herpes zoster: recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep 2008; 57:1-30; quiz CE2-4; PMID:18528318 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Kernahan J, McQuillin J, Craft AW. Measles in children who have malignant disease. Br Med J 1987; 295:15-8; PMID:3113596; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1136/bmj.295.6589.15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Mustafa MM, Weitman SD, Winick NJ, Bellini WJ, Timmons CF, Siegel JD. Subacute measles encephalitis in the young immunocompromised host: report of two cases diagnosed by polymerase chain reaction and treated with ribavirin and review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis 1993; 16:654-60; PMID:8323578; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/clind/16.5.654 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Gray MM, Hann IM, Glass S, Eden OB, Jones PM, Stevens RF. Mortality and morbidity caused by measles in children with malignant disease attending four major treatment centres: a retrospective review. Br Med J 1987; 295:19-22; PMID:3113597; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1136/bmj.295.6589.19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Feldman S, Andrew M, Norris M, McIntyre B, Iyer R. Decline in rates of seropositivity for measles, mumps, and rubella antibodies among previously immunized children treated for acute leukemia. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 27:388-90; PMID:9709893; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1086/514661 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.McCarthy M. Measles cases exceed 100 in US outbreak. Bmj 2015; 350:h622; PMID:25646696; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1136/bmj.h622 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Patel SR, Ortin M, Cohen BJ, Borrow R, Irving D, Sheldon J, Heath PT. Revaccination of children after completion of standard chemotherapy for acute leukemia. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44:635-42; PMID:17278052; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1086/511636 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Di Sabatino A, Carsetti R, Corazza GR. Post-splenectomy and hyposplenic states. Lancet 2011; 378:86-97; PMID:21474172; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61493-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Edgren G, Almqvist R, Hartman M, Utter GH. Splenectomy and the risk of sepsis: a population-based cohort study. Ann Surg 2014; 260:1081-7; PMID:24374533; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000439 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kuchar E, Nitsch-Osuch A, Stolarczyk C, Kurpas D, Zycinska K, Wardyn K, Szenborn L. Immunization coverage against capsular bacteria in splenectomized patients. Adv Exp Med Biol 2013; 788:139-45; PMID:23835971; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/978-94-007-6627-3_21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Rosado MM, Gesualdo F, Marcellini V, Di Sabatino A, Corazza GR, Smacchia MP, Nobili B, Baronci C, Russo L, Rossi F, et al.. Preserved antibody levels and loss of memory B cells against pneumococcus and tetanus after splenectomy: tailoring better vaccination strategies. Eur J Immunol 2013; 43:2659-70; PMID:23813052; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/eji.201343577 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Kim DK, Bridges CB, Harriman KH, Advisory Committee on Immunization P . Advisory committee on immunization practices recommended immunization schedule for adults aged 19 years or older: United States, 2015*. Ann Intern Med 2015; 162:214-23; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.7326/M14-2755 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Balmer P, Falconer M, McDonald P, Andrews N, Fuller E, Riley C, Kaczmarski E, Borrow R. Immune response to meningococcal serogroup C conjugate vaccine in asplenic individuals. Infect Immun 2004; 72:332-7; PMID:14688112; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/IAI.72.1.332-337.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Cohn AC, MacNeil JR, Clark TA, Ortega-Sanchez IR, Briere EZ, Meissner HC, Baker CJ, Messonnier NE; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) . Prevention and control of meningococcal disease: recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep 2013; 62:1-28; PMID:23515099 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Snape MD, Perrett KP, Ford KJ, John TM, Pace D, Yu LM, Langley JM, McNeil S, Dull PM, Ceddia F, et al.. Immunogenicity of a tetravalent meningococcal glycoconjugate vaccine in infants: a randomized controlled trial. Jama 2008; 299:173-84; PMID:18182599; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1001/jama.2007.29-c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Borrow R, Joseph H, Andrews N, Acuna M, Longworth E, Martin S, Peake N, Rahim R, Richmond P, Kaczmarski E, et al.. Reduced antibody response to revaccination with meningococcal serogroup A polysaccharide vaccine in adults. Vaccine 2000; 19:1129-32; PMID:11137248; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/S0264-410X(00)00317-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Kristensen K. Antibody response to a Haemophilus influenzae type b polysaccharide tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine in splenectomized children and adolescents. Scand J Infect Dis 1992; 24:629-32; PMID:1465581; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3109/00365549209054649 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Cimaz R, Mensi C, D'Angelo E, Fantola E, Milone V, Biasio LR, Carnelli V, Zanetti AR. Safety and immunogenicity of a conjugate vaccine against Haemophilus influenzae type b in splenectomized and nonsplenectomized patients with Cooley anemia. J Infect Dis 2001; 183:1819-21; PMID:11372038; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1086/320727 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Askling HH, Dalm VA. The medically immunocompromised adult traveler and pre-travel counseling: status quo 2014. Travel Med Infect Dis 2014; 12:219-28; PMID:24821082; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.tmaid.2014.04.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kotton CN. Travel and transplantation: travel-related diseases in transplant recipients. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2012; 17:594-600; PMID:23147910 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Yee SS, Dutta PR, Solin LJ, Vapiwala N, Kao GD. Lack of compliance with national vaccination guidelines in oncology patients receiving radiation therapy. J Support Oncol 2010; 8:28-34; PMID:20235421; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.suponc.2010.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Adriani KS, Brouwer MC, van der Ende A, van de Beek D. Bacterial meningitis in adults after splenectomy and hyposplenic states. Mayo Clin Proc 2013; 88:571-8; PMID:23628588; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.02.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Lammers AJ, Veninga D, Lombarts MJ, Hoekstra JB, Speelman P. Management of post-splenectomy patients in the Netherlands. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2010; 29:399-405; PMID:20094896; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s10096-009-0870-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES