Abstract
Retinal opsin photopigments initiate mammalian vision when stimulated by light. Most mammals possess a short wavelength-sensitive opsin 1 (SWS1) pigment that is primarily sensitive to either ultraviolet or violet light, leading to variation in colour perception across species. Despite knowledge of both ultraviolet- and violet-sensitive SWS1 classes in mammals for 25 years, the adaptive significance of this variation has not been subjected to hypothesis testing, resulting in minimal understanding of the basis for mammalian SWS1 spectral tuning evolution. Here, we gathered data on SWS1 for 403 mammal species, including novel SWS1 sequences for 97 species. Ancestral sequence reconstructions suggest that the most recent common ancestor of Theria possessed an ultraviolet SWS1 pigment, and that violet-sensitive pigments evolved at least 12 times in mammalian history. We also observed that ultraviolet pigments, previously considered to be a rarity, are common in mammals. We then used phylogenetic comparative methods to test the hypotheses that the evolution of violet-sensitive SWS1 is associated with increased light exposure, extended longevity and longer eye length. We discovered that diurnal mammals and species with longer eyes are more likely to have violet-sensitive pigments and less likely to possess UV-sensitive pigments. We hypothesize that (i) as mammals evolved larger body sizes, they evolved longer eyes, which limited transmittance of ultraviolet light to the retina due to an increase in Rayleigh scattering, and (ii) as mammals began to invade diurnal temporal niches, they evolved lenses with low UV transmittance to reduce chromatic aberration and/or photo-oxidative damage.
Keywords: short wavelength-sensitive opsin 1, opsin, ultraviolet vision, colour vision, Mammalia
1. Introduction
Mammalian vision is initiated by the absorption of light by retinal photopigments, which are composed in part by the G-protein-coupled receptors known as opsins. The three visual opsins found in therian mammals—short wavelength-sensitive 1 (SWS1), long wavelength-sensitive (LWS) and rod opsin (RH1)—differ in their peak absorption wavelength (λmax), with SWS1 ranging from ultraviolet-sensitive (350–370 nm; UVS) to violet-sensitive (400–457 nm; VS). UVS pigments are typically considered rare in mammals, having been directly measured in only 10 rodents [1–6] and four marsupials [7–9], although predictions based on SWS1 opsin sequences suggest that UVS pigments may be more widespread [8,10–20]. The utility of UVS versus VS pigments may be related to the detection of specific stimuli, particularly cues for foraging and communication [21–23]. Alternatively, broader selection pressures may govern the evolution of SWS1 spectral tuning. For example, UVS pigments would facilitate the detection of a wider spectrum of light than VS pigments, assuming a fixed λmax for LWS [24]. Additionally, UVS SWS1 pigments may allow for greater chromatic contrast than VS SWS1 pigments due to increased spectral separation from LWS [25–27]. The widespread presence of UVS pigments in various vertebrates and the likelihood that a UVS SWS1 is the ancestral condition [28] suggests UVS pigments may be optimal for most vertebrate species. If correct, this raises the question of why most mammals have VS SWS1 pigments.
Prior to the discovery of UVS pigments in mammals by Jacobs et al. [1], Goldsmith [29] suggested that mammals lack UV receptors because their eyes have lenses that filter out ultraviolet light. Indeed, some diurnal mammal lenses transmit little to no UV light [30,31], but the lenses of certain nocturnal [18,30,31] and subterranean [4,20] mammals transmit UV light effectively, suggesting that photic niche (i.e. overall amount of light encountered by a species) may be influencing lens transmittance and ultimately SWS1 spectral tuning. Diurnal species may evolve lenses that reduce UV lens transmittance to limit the retina's exposure to damaging UV light and minimize chromatic aberration to improve visual acuity, though at the cost of reducing the wavelengths of light available to the retina and diminishing colour discrimination. This hypothesis predicts that species that occupy dim-light niches have UVS pigments, diurnal species have VS pigments and cathemeral/crepuscular mammals, which experience an intermediate amount of light, may have UVS or VS pigments. If UV-induced damage is a selection pressure driving lens evolution, then longevity may also influence SWS1 spectral tuning. Long-lived mammals experience greater amounts of UV light, on average, and therefore should have a higher likelihood of ocular damage than short-lived species. This hypothesis predicts that the ocular media of longer-lived mammals evolved to reduce retinal exposure to UV light. In fact, several mammals show a reduction in lens short-wavelength transmittance as they age [30,32], suggesting that longer-lived mammals are more likely to have VS pigments. A third hypothesis is that eye length influences SWS1 spectral tuning [33]. The ocular media as a whole (i.e. cornea, aqueous humour, lens, vitreous humour) can attenuate UV transmittance, probably due in part to increased Rayleigh scattering of shorter wavelengths. Longer eyes are predicted to increase UV scattering due to the longer optical path length, reducing the amount of UV light that reaches the retina, a hypothesis supported by an analysis of avian eyes [34]. The retention of UVS pigments in longer eyes would reduce the overall photon catch of SWS1 cones, therefore leading to selection for VS pigments.
Here we test whether increases in photic niche brightness, longevity and eye length lead to increased SWS1 λmax. We predict that the evolution of SWS1 spectral sensitivity in mammals is directly driven by the evolution of the ocular media, which in turn is influenced by the evolution of photic niche, longevity and eye length. Our results suggest that the ancestral therian mammal possessed a UVS SWS1, and this shifted to VS on at least 12 occasions in association with increases in light exposure and eye length.
2. Material and methods
We collected data on the presence/absence of SWS1 cones and spectral tuning of SWS1 opsin from the literature, GenBank, in silico assemblies of SWS1 from publicly available genomes (Ensembl; PreEnsembl; NCBI's whole genome shotgun database, hereafter WGS), and de novo sequences of SWS1 exon 1 generated from PCR amplification (electronic supplementary material, table S1). We deemed SWS1 cones as present in a species under the following conditions: positive immunostaining of cones with SWS1 opsin antibodies, electrophysiological or microspectrophotometric recordings of the retina/individual cones with a λmax consistent with SWS1 (approx. 350–450 nm), SWS1 mRNA expression in retinal extracts, and/or the presence of intact SWS1 DNA sequences that lack inactivating mutations. Though none of the methods individually provides proof positive of functional SWS1 cones, there is a high level of consonance between the methods, suggesting that this is a reliable approach (see references in the electronic supplementary material, table S1). We concluded that SWS1 cones are absent when there were negative results from any of the above methods. When more than one λmax estimate was reported in the literature, we selected the largest value for phylogenetic generalized least-squares (PGLS) analyses. We assembled sequences from genomes after BLASTing query mRNA sequences from GenBank against the genome databases using the BLAT algorithm for Ensembl/PreEnsembl and discontiguous megablast for WGS. If we had negative results, we used a less restrictive BLAST algorithm and/or query sequences from more closely related species. For de novo sequences, we designed primers based on the 5′ UTR and intron 1 of SWS1 genome sequences of closely related taxa (electronic supplementary material, table S2). We performed nested PCR with Ramp-Taq DNA polymerase (Denville Scientific Inc.) in 50 ml reactions with the following thermal cycling parameters: template denaturation at 95°C for 7 min; 45 cycles of 1 min at 95°C (denaturation), 1 min at 50°C (annealing) and 2 min at 72°C (extension); a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. We used 500–750 ng of genomic DNA for the initial PCR reactions and 1–1.5 ml of PCR product in the nested PCR reactions. We assayed the final PCR products on 1% agarose gels, excised bands of interest with razor blades, and cleaned them with the Bioneer AccuPrep Gel Purification kit. Purified PCR products were sequenced in both directions at the UCR Core Instrumentation Facility with an automated DNA sequencer (ABI 3730xl). We performed contig assembly in Geneious [35] v. 5.6.5 using the Muscle alignment tool [36]. All sequences were aligned manually with Se-Al v. 2.0a11 [37].
We collected data for eye length (i.e. axial diameter) from various sources (electronic supplementary material, table S3), longevity from PanTHERIA [38] and AnAge [39], and photic niche from PanTHERIA and the literature (Hall et al. [40] and Roll et al. [41], and mammalian species accounts as listed in electronic supplementary material, table S3). In cases where eye length or longevity data conflicted, we selected the largest value reported among the sources. We coded photic niche as mesopic (sensu Jones et al. [38]) when data conflicted.
We performed ancestral DNA sequence reconstructions of SWS1 using 218 mammals and eight outgroup taxa (electronic supplementary material, dataset S1) to infer historical shifts in spectral tuning based on residues 86 and 93 + 114 (see below; bovine RH1 numbering here and throughout). We used both putatively functional and pseudogenic sequences to increase taxonomic coverage. We performed reconstructions with codeml in PAML v. 4.4 [42], and compared four codon frequency models using the Akaike information criterion, with equal codon frequencies providing the best fit (electronic supplementary material, table S4).
We predicted the spectral tuning for newly reported sequences (genome- and PCR-derived) on the basis of comparative sequence and mutagenesis data (electronic supplementary material, tables S1 and S5). We recorded 13 residues in exon 1 of SWS1 known to affect spectral tuning [43]. All examined mammalian SWS1 sequences with F86 and T93 have UVS pigments, whereas possessing a tyrosine, serine or valine at 86 yields a VS pigment. By contrast, primates have a unique sequence combination that produces a VS pigment, apparently being determined by possessing a P93 (electronic supplementary material, table S1). Mutagenesis studies have demonstrated the importance of these amino acids in shifting UVS to VS pigments and vice versa [44–52], whereas mutations at other sites only induce minor spectral shifts. Therefore, we predicted that an SWS1 pigment is UVS if it possesses F86 and T93, and a VS pigment if it has Y86, S86, V86 or P93.
We estimated a phylogeny for mammalian species with data for SWS1 cones (i.e. presence/absence and/or spectral tuning), and added mammalian species and tetrapod outgroups from Meredith et al. [53] to provide a robust backbone for the tree. We only included one representative from each cetacean family due to the parallel inactivation of SWS1 in odontocetes and mysticetes [54]. Some taxa with high percentages of missing gene sequences and/or non-overlapping sequences (e.g. with other congeners) resisted robust phylogenetic placement and were not included in phylogenetic analyses. Finally, we added species to minimize long-branch misplacement (e.g. Miniopterus spp.). We collected DNA sequences for 38 genes (27 nuclear and 11 mitochondrial) from GenBank and various genomic resources (electronic supplementary material, table S6, dataset S2). We used the discontiguous megablast algorithm to obtain GenBank and WGS sequences, and BLAT for Ensembl and PreEnsembl sequences. We aligned sequences with Muscle in Geneious and adjusted them manually in Se-Al. Alignment-ambiguous regions and contaminants were excluded prior to phylogenetic analysis. We concatenated the final gene alignments into a DNA supermatrix with SequenceMatrix [55] v. 1.7.8, and executed a RAxML [56] (v. 8.1.11) analysis on CIPRES [57], giving each gene partition its own model of DNA sequence evolution (GTRGAMMA). We ran 500 bootstrap iterations with GTRCAT but otherwise used the default settings on CIPRES.
We estimated divergence times with chronos in the APE package in R [58–60]. We estimated the smoothing parameter with the cross-validation method implemented in chronopl in APE, starting at 0 and using a logarithmic scale from 10−6 to 1014. We set the smoothing parameter to the optimal value (107), employed 77 calibrations (electronic supplementary material, calibrations) and used the correlated model of sequence evolution. We implemented the resulting timetree in all subsequent phylogenetic comparative analyses.
We tested the hypothesis that the average amount of light exposed to the eye (photic niche) is correlated with spectral tuning with SiMMaP v. 1.5 [61,62]. We coded photic niche as scotopic/dim light (0) for nocturnal and subterranean species, mesopic/moderate light (1) for cathemeral and crepuscular species, or photopic/bright light (2) for diurnal species. We coded spectral tuning as UVS (0) or VS (1) based on measured λmax and/or DNA sequence predictions. We estimated character evolution priors [63] using the MCMC method described in SiMMaP (cycles: 100 000; sampling freq: 200; burnin: 10 000; rate upper bound: 1000): (i) photic niche: rate prior parameter α = 26.128, β = 2006.996; (ii) spectral tuning: rate prior parameter α = 8.870, β = 3616.625, bias parameter α = 85.737. We set the bias parameter for photic niche to empirical, and used the default number of categories (k) for the priors (bias = 31; rate = 60). We pruned all species from the timetree that lacked sufficient data, and ran analyses with state ordering for photic niche as unordered and ordered. Sampling settings for the correlation analysis were 2000 samples, 10 prior draws and 1000 predictive samples.
We used phylogenetic logistic regression [64] to test the hypotheses that longevity and eye length predict spectral tuning, respectively. We coded spectral tuning as above, and log-transformed longevity and eye length prior to analysis. After pruning taxa with insufficient data, we converted the reduced timetrees into variance–covariance matrices (vcv function in APE). We performed phylogenetic logistic regression using the PLogReg function in Matlab [65] with 2000 bootstrap simulations to calculate confidence intervals. We standardized the independent variables to have a mean of zero and a variance of one, and set the initial estimate of a to −1.
We performed PGLS [66] in the caper package in R [67] to test the hypotheses that photic niche, longevity and eye length influence SWS1 λmax individually and in concert. We coded the independent variables as above, and pruned all species from the timetree that lacked data on λmax and at least one of the predictor variables. We used a phylogenetic correction based on a maximum-likelihood estimate of Pagel's λ, which in each case equalled 1.
3. Results and discussion
We assembled 40 complete or partial SWS1 sequences derived from published genomes, and generated 57 complete or partial SWS1 exon 1 sequences via PCR and Sanger sequencing for a total of 97 novel sequences (electronic supplementary material, dataset S3). Five novel sequences are pseudogenes (electronic supplementary material, table S7), suggesting that these species lack SWS1 cones. Three species—Odobenus rosmarus (walrus), Callorhinus ursinus (northern fur seal), Notoryctes typhlops (marsupial mole)—have intact coding sequences for complete or partial SWS1, but external evidence suggests that SWS1 cones are absent in each [68–70]. Our combined dataset describes 270 species with functional SWS1 cones, 214 of which have measured or predicted spectral tuning (electronic supplementary material, table S1), and 133 with non-functional SWS1 cones, a common trait in species occupying scotopic niches (see [2,12,17,49,54,69–71] for discussion). Our novel sequence data increase the taxonomic coverage of SWS1 spectral tuning to 39 additional mammalian families. In total, we report 89 species with UVS pigments and 125 with VS pigments. These proportions suggest that UVS pigments in mammals are far more prevalent (41.6%) than previously assumed, which becomes even more apparent considering that the most diverse mammalian clades (e.g. murid and cricetid rodents, bats) so far only appear to possess UVS pigments.
We performed ancestral sequence reconstructions to infer the history of SWS1 spectral tuning in mammals. The topology we used (RAxML best tree) can be found in the electronic supplementary material (dataset S4). Based on changes in key residues, our reconstructions indicate that therian mammals inherited a UVS SWS1 pigment from an amniote ancestor, which shifted to a VS pigment on at least 12 occasions (figure 1). Seven shifts to a VS pigment occurred via F86Y, two through F86V, one by F86S, and on the stem Primates branch, a T93P substitution was accompanied by A114G (electronic supplementary material, table S8). Though Carvalho et al. [52] showed that introducing a P93T mutation into the aye-aye (Daubentonia madagascariensis) VS SWS1 pigment shifts it to UVS, Shi et al. [51] demonstrated that T93P is not sufficient to induce a mouse (Mus musculus) UVS pigment to shift to VS. Upon closer inspection, we found that the aye-aye and ancestral primate pigments are identical to the mouse UVS pigment at every tuning site except P93 and G114. Shi et al. [51] created four mouse SWS1 mutants that had P93 + G114, all of which shifted mouse UVS to VS. Together these data suggest that the shift of primate pigments from UVS to VS is accomplished by T93P + A114G as opposed to T93P alone. Most examined primate SWS1 pigments retain P93 + G114, with cercopithecids and Cebus reverting to A114, and presbytins acquiring S114. However, these latter species possess additional substitutions that appear to have allowed them to retain VS pigments in the absence of G114 (electronic supplementary material, table S1). Three tuning site substitutions on the stem lagomorph branch (F86A, T93N, L116 T) resulted in a pigment identical to that of Oryctolagus cuniculus (European rabbit; λmax = 425 nm [72]), representing a novel mechanism for inducing a shift to a VS pigment. Whether one or a combination of these substitutions causes the shift will need to be verified with mutagenesis studies.
Figure 1.
Timetree with collapsed branches showing the diversity and major evolutionary transitions of SWS1 in mammals. Changes in colour along branches represent SWS1 transitions and have been arbitrarily dated to the midpoint of the branch on which they occurred. For species for which no sequence data are available, we indicated their most parsimonious ancestral states. For species that have complete SWS1 pseudogene sequences but show no evidence of shared inactivating mutations with other species, we assumed they lost SWS1 independently (e.g. pinnipeds). Paintings by Carl Buell, copyright John Gatesy.
The timetree we used for phylogenetic comparative analyses is in the electronic supplementary material (dataset S4). The SiMMaP results (n = 163; table 1) indicate that photic niche is significantly correlated with spectral tuning. For both the unordered and ordered results, scotopic niche is positively associated with a UVS pigment and negatively associated with a VS pigment, whereas photopic niche is negatively associated with a UVS pigment and positively associated with a VS pigment, with one exception (m(Ph,UVS) ordered, p = 0.08). Mesopic niche is negatively correlated with UVS pigments and positively with VS pigments, though only when photic niche was ordered. As predicted, the strength of these correlations was generally weaker than those for photopic niche.
Table 1.
Results from SiMMaP analyses. M and D represent the overall correlation between traits, and m and d indicate state-by-state correlations. For state-by-state correlations: before comma = photic niche (Sc = scotopic; Me = mesopic; Ph = photopic); after comma = spectral tuning. Positive value = positive association between states; negative value = negative association. Bold p-values are <0.05.
| unordered |
ordered |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| statistic | value | p-value | value | p-value |
| M | 0.095164 | 0.015 | 0.130264 | 0.013 |
| m(Sc,UVS) | 0.112146 | 0.006 | 0.132556 | 0.003 |
| m(Sc,VS) | −0.076043 | 0.002 | −0.079747 | 0.001 |
| m(Me,UVS) | −0.030418 | 0.062 | −0.039905 | 0.004 |
| m(Me,VS) | 0.043092 | 0.071 | 0.055572 | 0.01 |
| m(Ph,UVS) | −0.028834 | 0.04 | −0.019639 | 0.08 |
| m(Ph,VS) | 0.07522 | 0.009 | 0.081426 | 0.015 |
| D | 0.385206 | 0.009 | 0.440227 | 0.004 |
| d(Sc,UVS) | 0.096194 | 0.003 | 0.110043 | 0.001 |
| d(Sc,VS) | −0.096198 | 0.003 | −0.110047 | 0.001 |
| d(Me,UVS) | −0.037621 | 0.068 | −0.048824 | 0.008 |
| d(Me,VS) | 0.037619 | 0.068 | 0.048821 | 0.008 |
| d(Ph,UVS) | −0.058577 | 0.014 | −0.061223 | 0.022 |
| d(Ph,VS) | 0.058575 | 0.014 | 0.061222 | 0.022 |
The phylogenetic logistic regression analyses (table 2; electronic supplementary material, figures S1 and S2) indicate that increases in both log eye length and log longevity significantly predict UVS to VS pigment shifts. Log eye length has a larger effect on spectral tuning (β = 3.24) than log longevity (β = 0.908), suggesting that eye length's association with SWS1 evolution is more important than longevity.
Table 2.
Results from phylogenetic logistic regression analyses. Eye length and longevity are log-transformed.
| predictor | n | β | p-value | bootstrap p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| eye length | 98 | 3.2354 ± 0.6896 | 2.71×10−6 | 0 |
| longevity | 162 | 0.90765 ± 0.1972 | 4.17×10−6 | 0 |
Our PGLS results corroborate the SiMMaP and phylogenetic logistic regression results with one important caveat. Photic niche, log longevity and log eye length all individually have a positive relationship with SWS1 λmax (table 3; electronic supplementary material, figures S3–S5), with log eye length predicting λmax better (R2 = 0.3595) than log longevity (R2 = 0.1601) and photic niche (R2 = 0.08559). However, the results of our multiple regression analyses demonstrate that only log eye length and photic niche contribute to λmax (adjusted R2 = 0.4093). Both eye length and longevity are highly correlated with body size [73,74], which may explain why log longevity's effect on λmax drops out in multiple regression analyses.
Table 3.
Results from PGLS analyses. Eye length and longevity are log-transformed. The dependent variable in all cases is λmax. Bold p-values are <0.05.
| predictor | n | coefficient | R2 | adjusted R2 | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| eye length | 45 | 54.465 | 0.3595 | 1.35 × 10–5 | |
| longevity | 54 | 25.1702 | 0.1601 | 0.00272 | |
| photic niche | 50 | 6.4915 | 0.08559 | 0.0392 | |
| eye length + longevity | 42 | 0.3384 | 9.74 × 10–5 | ||
| eye length | 53.7523 | 0.00171 | |||
| longevity | 1.8035 | 0.87901 | |||
| eye length + photic niche | 37 | 0.4093 | 3.77 × 10–5 | ||
| eye length | 35.812 | 0.00907 | |||
| photic niche | 15.7822 | 0.00145 | |||
| longevity + photic niche | 46 | 0.1062 | 0.0318 | ||
| longevity | 14.9755 | 0.0827 | |||
| photic niche | 5.0101 | 0.1517 | |||
| eye length + longevity + photic niche | 34 | 0.4031 | 1.99 × 10–4 | ||
| eye length | 44.0483 | 0.0201 | |||
| longevity | −6.012 | 0.6 | |||
| photic niche | 15.9425 | 0.00232 | |||
| photic niche B | 35 | 15.7639 | 0.1571 | 0.0184 | |
| eye length + photic niche B | 23 | 0.5884 | 3.44 × 10–5 | ||
| eye length | 38.6457 | 0.0327 | |||
| photic niche B | 42.7075 | 1.83 × 10–4 | |||
| longevity + photic niche B | 32 | 0.08967 | 0.0928 | ||
| longevity | 8.4025 | 0.416 | |||
| photic niche B | 12.7197 | 0.104 | |||
| eye length + longevity + photic niche B | 21 | 0.5927 | 1.46 × 10–4 | ||
| eye length | 53.1516 | 0.0236 | |||
| longevity | −8.8661 | 0.377 | |||
| photic niche B | 42.6962 | 3.04 × 10−4 |
Since the term ‘mesopic’ (cathemeral/crepuscular) covers a broad range of light exposure conditions, it may mask a larger effect of photic niche on λmax. We performed additional PGLS analyses with photic niche recoded as a binary trait by eliminating mesopic species (photic niche B: scotopic = 0, photopic = 1). With this alternative coding, photic niche provides better predictions of λmax, both individually (R2 = 0.1571; table 3; electronic supplementary material, figure S6) and with eye length (adjusted multiple R2 = 0.5884). Photic niche's weaker effect on λmax in the individual PGLS analyses may be an artefact of recoding a continuous character as a discrete character and/or a higher rate of evolution for photic niche than SWS1 spectral tuning. The latter hypothesis is supported by our MCMC analyses in SiMMaP (mean photic niche rate: 0.013; mean spectral tuning rate: 0.00245). Nonetheless, photic niche appears to influence the evolution of ocular lens transmittance, which may in turn drive SWS1 evolution. We performed a PGLS analysis on Douglas & Jeffery's [32] dataset and confirmed that species that occupy brighter niches have lenses that transmit less UV light (n = 19; coefficient = −30.187; R2 = 0.6819; p = 1.336 × 10–5; Pagel's λ = 0; electronic supplementary material, figure S7).
Our results suggest that mammalian UVS SWS1 pigments were inherited from an amniote ancestor and maintained in small-eyed species that occupy dim-light niches. The evolution of VS pigments was probably driven in part by increases in light exposure and eye length. We hypothesize that occupying brighter niches and evolving longer eyes decreased transmittance of UV via the ocular media [34], facilitating selection for VS pigments to maximize photon capture. The evolution of lenses with decreased UV transmittance may have been driven by selection pressure(s) to reduce chromatic aberration and/or retinal exposure to harmful UV radiation in bright light. The evolution of longer eyes may be largely a secondary effect of increased body size, since body size positively correlates with eye length. Increases in both light exposure and eye length may ultimately be traced to mammalian niche diversification that occurred after the K–Pg mass extinction. Mammals in the Mesozoic were generally small-bodied and probably nocturnal [75], features typically attributed to predation by, and/or competition with, dinosaurs. Many mammals evolved larger body sizes after the extinction of non-avian dinosaurs [76] and others may have become more active during the day, resulting in decreased ocular transmittance of ultraviolet light and selection for violet-sensitive SWS1. If the UVS to VS shifts occurred at the midpoint of their respective branches (figure 1), then six of 10 occurred within approximately 10 Myr of the K–Pg boundary. Though a very crude estimate of the timing of these shifts, it implies that this major niche diversification event may have ultimately driven SWS1 evolution.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank three anonymous reviewers for comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.
Data accessibility
New DNA sequences were deposited in GenBank (KT221553–KT221609). Accession numbers for all sequences can be found in the electronic supplementary material, tables S1 and S6. DNA alignments and phylogenies are uploaded as electronic supplementary material (datasets S1–S4).
Authors' contributions
C.A.E. and M.S.S. conceived of and designed the study and wrote the manuscript; C.A.E., H.T.H., M.A.N., R.W.M. and M.S.S. collected the data; C.A.E. and R.W.M. generated de novo sequence data; C.A.E. analysed the data. All authors approved the final version of this manuscript.
Competing interests
We declare we have no competing interests.
Funding
This research was funded by NSF grant no. EF0629860 (M.S.S.) and an American Society of Mammalogists Grant-In-Aid of Research (C.A.E.).
References
- 1.Jacobs G, Neitz J, Deegan J. 1991. Retinal receptors in rodents maximally sensitive to ultraviolet light. Nature 353, 655–656. ( 10.1038/353655a0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Calderone JB, Jacobs GH. 1999. Cone receptor variations and their functional consequences in two species of hamster. Vis. Neurosci. 16, 53–63. ( 10.1017/S0952523899161029) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jacobs GH, Calderone JB, Fenwick JA, Krogh K, Williams GA. 2003. Visual adaptations in a diurnal rodent, Octodon degus. J. Comp. Physiol. A. Neuroethol. Sens. Neural. Behav. Physiol. 189, 347–361. ( 10.1007/s00359-003-0408-0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Williams GA, Calderone JB, Jacobs GH. 2005. Photoreceptors and photopigments in a subterranean rodent, the pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae). J. Comp. Physiol. A Neuroethol. Sensory, Neural, Behav. Physiol. 191, 125–134. ( 10.1007/s00359-004-0578-4) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Peichl L, Chavez AE, Ocampo A, Mena W, Bozinovic F, Palacios AG. 2005. Eye and vision in the subterranean rodent cururo (Spalacopus cyanus, Octodontidae). J. Comp. Neurol. 486, 197–208. ( 10.1002/cne.20491) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Schleich CE, Vielma A, Glösmann M, Palacios AG, Peichl L. 2010. Retinal photoreceptors of two subterranean tuco-tuco species (Rodentia, Ctenomys): morphology, topography, and spectral sensitivity. J. Comp. Neurol. 518, 4001–4015. ( 10.1002/cne.22440) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Arrese CA, Hart NS, Thomas N, Beazley LD, Shand J. 2002. Trichromacy in Australian marsupials. Curr. Biol. 12, 657–660. ( 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00772-8) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hunt DM, Chan J, Carvalho LS, Hokoc JN, Ferguson MC, Arrese CA, Beazley LD. 2009. Cone visual pigments in two species of South American marsupials. Gene 433, 50–55. ( 10.1016/j.gene.2008.12.006) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Palacios AG, Bozinovic F, Vielma A, Arrese CA, Hunt DM, Peichl L. 2010. Retinal photoreceptor arrangement, SWS1 and LWS opsin sequence, and electroretinography in the South American marsupial Thylamys elegans (Waterhouse, 1839). J. Comp. Neurol. 518, 1589–1602. ( 10.1002/cne.22292) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gaillard F, Kuny S, Sauvé Y. 2009. Topographic arrangement of S-cone photoreceptors in the retina of the diurnal Nile grass rat (Arvicanthis niloticus). Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 50, 5426–5434. ( 10.1167/iovs.09-3896) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Arbogast P, Glösmann M, Peichl L. 2013. Retinal cone photoreceptors of the deer mouse Peromyscus maniculatus: development, topography, opsin expression and spectral tuning. PLoS ONE 8, e80910 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0080910) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Emerling CA, Springer MS. 2014. Eyes underground: Regression of visual protein networks in subterranean mammals. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 78, 260–270. ( 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.05.016) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Strachan J, Chang L-YE, Wakefield MJ, Graves JAM, Deeb SS. 2004. Cone visual pigments of the Australian marsupials, the stripe-faced and fat-tailed dunnarts: sequence and inferred spectral properties. Vis. Neurosci. 21, 223–229. ( 10.1017/S0952523804213281) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Arrese CA, Oddy AY, Runham PB, Hart NS, Shand J, Hunt DM, Beazley LD. 2005. Cone topography and spectral sensitivity in two potentially trichromatic marsupials, the quokka (Setonix brachyurus) and quenda (Isoodon obesulus). Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 791–796. ( 10.1098/rspb.2004.3009) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Deeb SS. 2010. Visual pigments and colour vision in marsupials and monotremes. In Marsupial genetics and genomics (eds PD Waters, JE Deakin, JM Graves), pp. 403–414. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wang D, Oakley T, Mower J, Shimmin LC, Yim S, Honeycutt RL, Tsao H, Li W-H. 2004. Molecular evolution of bat color vision genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 295–302. ( 10.1093/molbev/msh015) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhao H, Rossiter SJ, Teeling EC, Li C, Cotton JA, Zhang S. 2009. The evolution of color vision in nocturnal mammals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 8980–8985. ( 10.1073/pnas.0813201106) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Müller B, Glösmann M, Peichl L, Knop GC, Hagemann C, Ammermüller J. 2009. Bat eyes have ultraviolet-sensitive cone photoreceptors. PLoS ONE 4, e6390 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0006390) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Feller KD, Lagerholm S, Clubwala R, Silver MT, Haughey D, Ryan JM, Loew ER, Deutschlander ME, Kenyon KL. 2009. Characterization of photoreceptor cell types in the little brown bat Myotis lucifugus (Vespertilionidae). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B 154, 412–418. ( 10.1016/j.cbpb.2009.08.006) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Glösmann M, Steiner M, Ahnelt PK. 2008. Cone photoreceptors and potential UV vision in a subterranean insectivore, the European mole. J. Vis. 8, 1–12. ( 10.1167/8.4.23.Introduction) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Honkavaara J, Koivula M, Korpimaki E, Siitari H, Viitala J. 2002. Ultraviolet vision and foraging in terrestrial vertebrates. Oikos 98, 505–511. ( 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.980315.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhao H, Xu D, Zhou Y, Flanders J, Zhang S. 2009. Evolution of opsin genes reveals a functional role of vision in the echolocating little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus). Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 37, 154–161. ( 10.1016/j.bse.2009.03.001) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Melin AD, Moritz GL, Fosbury RAE, Kawamura S, Dominy NJ. 2012. Why aye-ayes see blue. Am. J. Primatol. 74, 185–192. ( 10.1002/ajp.21996) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jacobs GH. 1992. Ultraviolet vision in vertebrates. Am. Zool. 32, 544–554. ( 10.1093/icb/32.4.544) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chiao CC, Vorobyev M, Cronin TW, Osorio D. 2000. Spectral tuning of dichromats to natural scenes. Vision Res. 40, 3257–3271. ( 10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00156-5) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Vorobyev M. 2003. Coloured oil droplets enhance colour discrimination. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270, 1255–1261. ( 10.1098/rspb.2003.2381) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gouras P, Ekesten B. 2004. Why do mice have ultra-violet vision? Exp. Eye Res. 79, 887–892. ( 10.1016/j.exer.2004.06.031) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hunt DM, Peichl L. 2013. S cones: evolution, retinal distribution, development, and spectral sensitivity. Vis. Neurosci. 31, 115–138. ( 10.1017/S0952523813000242) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Goldsmith TH. 1990. Optimization, constraint, and history in the evolution of eyes. Q. Rev. Biol. 65, 281–322. ( 10.1086/416840) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cooper GF, Robson JG. 1969. The yellow colour of the lens of man and other primates. J. Physiol. 203, 411–417. ( 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008871) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hut RA, Scheper A, Daan S. 2000. Can the circadian system of a diurnal and a nocturnal rodent entrain to ultraviolet light? J. Comp. Physiol. A Sensory, Neural, Behav. Physiol. 186, 707–715. ( 10.1007/s003590000124) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Douglas RH, Jeffery G. 2014. The spectral transmission of ocular media suggests ultraviolet sensitivity is widespread among mammals. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20132995 ( 10.1098/rspb.2013.2995) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hart NS. 2001. The visual ecology of avian photoreceptors. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 20, 675–703. ( 10.1016/S1350-9462(01)00009-X) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lind O, Mitkus M, Olsson P, Kelber A. 2014. Ultraviolet vision in birds: the importance of transparent eye media. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20132209 ( 10.1098/rspb.2013.2209) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Drummond AJ, Ashton B, Buxton S, Cheung M, Cooper A, Duran C, Heled J. 2012. Geneious v. 5.6.5. See http://www.geneious.com. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Edgar RC. 2004. Muscle: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792–1797. ( 10.1093/nar/gkh340) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rambaut A. 1996. Se-Al: Sequence alignment editor. See http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/seal/. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jones KE, et al. 2009. PanTHERIA: a species-level database of life history, ecology, and geography of extant and recently extinct mammals. Ecology 90, 2648 ( 10.1890/08-1494.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Tacutu R, Craig T, Budovsky A, Wuttke D, Lehmann G, Taranukha D, Costa J, Fraifeld VE, de Magalhães JP. 2013. Human Ageing Genomic Resources: integrated databases and tools for the biology and genetics of ageing. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D1027–D1033. ( 10.1093/nar/gks1155) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hall MI, Kamilar JM, Kirk EC. 2012. Eye shape and the nocturnal bottleneck of mammals. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 4962–4968. ( 10.1098/rspb.2012.2258) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Roll U, Dayan T, Kronfeld-Schor N. 2006. On the role of phylogeny in determining activity patterns of rodents. Evol. Ecol. 20, 479–490. ( 10.1007/s10682-006-0015-y) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Yang Z. 2007. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1586–1591. ( 10.1093/molbev/msm088) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yokoyama S. 2008. Evolution of dim-light and color vision pigments. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 9, 259–822. ( 10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164228) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Cowing JA, Poopalasundaram S, Wilkie SE, Robinson PR, Bowmaker JK, Hunt DM. 2002. The molecular mechanism for the spectral shifts between vertebrate ultraviolet- and violet-sensitive cone visual pigments. Biochem. J. 367, 129–135. ( 10.1042/BJ20020483) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Fasick JI, Applebury ML, Oprian DD. 2002. Spectral tuning in the mammalian short-wavelength sensitive cone pigments. Biochemistry 41, 6860–6865. ( 10.1021/bi0200413) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hunt DM, Cowing JA, Wilkie SE, Parry JWL, Poopalasundaram S, Bowmaker JK. 2004. Divergent mechanisms for the tuning of shortwave sensitive visual pigments in vertebrates. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 3, 713–720. ( 10.1039/b314693f) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Parry JWL, Poopalasundaram S, Bowmaker JK, Hunt DM. 2004. A novel amino acid substitution is responsible for spectral tuning in a rodent violet-sensitive visual pigment. Biochemistry 43, 8014–8020. ( 10.1021/bi049478w) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yokoyama S, Takenaka N, Agnew DW, Shoshani J. 2005. Elephants and human color-blind deuteranopes have identical sets of visual pigments. Genetics 170, 335–344. ( 10.1534/genetics.104.039511) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Carvalho LDS, Cowing JA, Wilkie SE, Bowmaker JK, Hunt DM. 2006. Shortwave visual sensitivity in tree and flying squirrels reflects changes in lifestyle. Curr. Biol. 16, R81–R83. ( 10.1016/j.cub.2006.01.045) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Yokoyama S, Shi Y. 2000. Genetics and evolution of ultraviolet vision in vertebrates. FEBS Lett. 486, 167–172. ( 10.1016/S0014-5793(00)02269-9) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Shi Y, Radlwimmer FB, Yokoyama S. 2001. Molecular genetics and the evolution of ultraviolet vision in vertebrates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 11 731–11 736. ( 10.1073/pnas.201257398) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Carvalho LS, Davies WL, Robinson PR, Hunt DM. 2012. Spectral tuning and evolution of primate short-wavelength-sensitive visual pigments. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 387–393. ( 10.1098/rspb.2011.0782) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Meredith RW, et al. 2011. Impacts of the Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution and KPg extinction on mammal diversification. Science 334, 521–524. ( 10.1126/science.1211028) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Meredith RW, Gatesy J, Emerling CA, York VM, Springer MS. 2013. Rod monochromacy and the coevolution of cetacean retinal opsins. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003432 ( 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003432) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Vaidya G, Lohman DJ, Meier R. 2011. SequenceMatrix: Concatenation software for the fast assembly of multi-gene datasets with character set and codon information. Cladistics 27, 171–180. ( 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2010.00329.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312–1313. ( 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. 2010. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In 2010 Gateway Computing Environments Workshop, New Orleans, LA, 14 November 2010, pp. 45–52. New York, NY: IEEE.
- 58.Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K. 2004. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20, 289–290. ( 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Paradis E. 2013. Molecular dating of phylogenies by likelihood methods: a comparison of models and a new information criterion. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 67, 436–444. ( 10.1016/j.ympev.2013.02.008) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.R Core Team. 2013. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; See http://www.r-project.org/. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Huelsenbeck JP, Nielsen R, Bollback JP. 2003. Stochastic mapping of morphological characters. Syst. Biol. 52, 131–158. ( 10.1080/10635150390192780) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Bollback JP. 2006. SIMMAP: stochastic character mapping of discrete traits on phylogenies. BMC Bioinform. 7, 88 ( 10.1186/1471-2105-7-88) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Schultz TR, Churchill GA. 1999. The role of subjectivity in reconstructing ancestral character states: a Bayesian approach to unknown rates, states, and transformation asymmetries. Syst. Biol. 48, 651–664. (doi:0.1080/106351599260229) [Google Scholar]
- 64.Ives AR, Garland T. 2010. Phylogenetic logistic regression for binary dependent variables. Syst. Biol. 59, 9–26. ( 10.1093/sysbio/syp074) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.MathWorks. 2015. Matlab version 8.5. See http://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab/. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Grafen A. 1989. The phylogenetic regression. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 326, 119–157. ( 10.1098/rstb.1989.0106) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Orme D, Freckleton R, Thomas G, Petzoldt T, Fritz S, Isaac N, Pearse W. 2013. caper: comparative analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R. See http://cranr-projectorg/web/packages/caper/indexhtml.
- 68.Sweet G. 1906. Memoirs: contributions to our knowledge of the anatomy of Notoryctes typhlops, Stirling. Q. J. Microsc. Sci. 2, 547–572. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Peichl L, Behrmann G, Kröger RH. 2001. For whales and seals the ocean is not blue: a visual pigment loss in marine mammals. Eur. J. Neurosci. 13, 1520–1528. ( 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01533.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Levenson DH, Ponganis PJ, Crognale MA, Deegan JF, Dizon A, Jacobs GH. 2006. Visual pigments of marine carnivores: pinnipeds, polar bear, and sea otter. J. Comp. Physiol. A. Neuroethol. Sens. Neural. Behav. Physiol. 192, 833–843. ( 10.1007/s00359-006-0121-x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Emerling CA, Springer MS. 2015. Genomic evidence for rod monochromacy in sloths and armadillos suggests early subterranean history for Xenarthra. Proc. R. Soc. B 282, 20142192 ( 10.1098/rspb.2014.2192) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Nuboer J, Van Nuys W, Wortel J. 1983. Cone systems in the rabbit retina revealed by ERG-null-detection. J. Comp. Physiol. A 151, 347–352. ( 10.1007/BF00623909) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Howland HC, Merola S, Basarab JR. 2004. The allometry and scaling of the size of vertebrate eyes. Vision Res. 44, 2043–2065. ( 10.1016/j.visres.2004.03.023) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Speakman JR. 2005. Body size, energy metabolism and lifespan. J. Exp. Biol. 208, 1717–1730. ( 10.1242/jeb.01556) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Kemp TS. 2005. The origin and evolution of mammals. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 76.Smith FA, et al. 2010. The evolution of maximum body size of terrestrial mammals. Science 330, 1216–1219. ( 10.1126/science.1194830) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
New DNA sequences were deposited in GenBank (KT221553–KT221609). Accession numbers for all sequences can be found in the electronic supplementary material, tables S1 and S6. DNA alignments and phylogenies are uploaded as electronic supplementary material (datasets S1–S4).

