Abstract
Background
Metallothionein (MT) proteins play critical roles in the physiological handling of both essential (Cu and Zn) and toxic (Cd) metals. MT expression is regulated by metal-regulatory transcription factor 1 (MTF1). Hence, genetic variation in the MT gene family and MTF1 might therefore influence excretion of these metals.
Methods
321 women were recruited in Seattle, WA and Las Cruces, NM and provided demographic information, urine samples for measurement of metal concentrations by mass spectrometry and creatinine, and blood or saliva for extraction of DNA. Forty-one single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the MTF1 gene region and the region of chromosome 16 encoding the MT gene family were selected for genotyping in addition to an ancestry informative marker panel. Linear regression was used to estimate the association of SNPs with urinary Cd, Cu, and Zn, adjusted for age, urinary creatinine, smoking history, study site, and ancestry.
Results
Minor alleles of rs28366003 and rs10636 near the MT2A gene were associated with lower urinary Cd, Cu, and Zn. Minor alleles of rs8044719 and rs1599823, near MT1A and MT1B, were associated with lower urinary Cd and Zn, respectively. Minor alleles of rs4653329 in MTF1 was associated with lower urinary Cd.
Conclusions
These results suggest that genetic variation in the MT gene region and MTF1 influences urinary Cd, Cu, and Zn excretion.
Keywords: metallothionein, metal-regulatory transcription factor 1, cadmium, copper, zinc
INTRODUCTION
Metallothioneins (MTs) are a family of evolutionarily conserved, small cysteine-rich proteins that bind transition metal ions, including with highest affinity zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), and cadmium (Cd) (Bremner and Beattie 1990; Hamer 1986; Isani and Carpene 2014; Vasak and Meloni 2011). MTs are critical to homeostasis of the essential micronutrients Zn and Cu, and for detoxification of the toxic metal Cd, and also likely serve as reactive oxygen species scavengers(Babula et al. 2012). However, uncertainty over the many putative cellular functions of MTs remains(Isani and Carpene 2014; Palmiter 1998). The handling of metal ions by MT has been suggestively implicated in a variety of diseases including Alzheimer’s disease(Carrasco et al. 2006; Luo et al. 2013), cancer risk and progression(Goulding et al. 1995; Kelley et al. 1988; Kim et al. 2011), and renal and liver toxicity due to heavy metals(Klaassen and Liu 1997).
In addition to critical roles in handling metals, MTs are transcriptionally regulated in response to metal ions. A key protein in this process is metal-regulatory factor 1 (MTF1), which binds metal responsive elements located upstream of MT genes in the presence of heavy metals (Palmiter 1994). This step may be the critical pathway to the induction of MT in response to metals(Jiang et al. 2003), and thus genetic variation in MTF-1 may modulate expression of MT and thereby influence biological management of metals (Sims et al. 2012).
Earlier studies of genetic variation in MT genes have generally taken a candidate-gene approach in which a few single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are analyzed. Nonetheless, these studies have identified suggestive associations with risk of several cancers (Forma et al. 2012; Krzeslak et al. 2012; Starska et al. 2014; Zavras et al. 2010), diabetes (Giacconi et al. 2005; Yang et al. 2008), and other diseases (Chen et al. 2010; Chen et al. 2012; Giacconi et al. 2007; Hayashi et al. 2006) as well as levels of metals in biological matrices such as blood, urine, and kidney tissue(Chen et al. 2012; Kayaalti et al. 2010; Kayaalti et al. 2011; Lei et al. 2012; Raudenska et al. 2014). However, candidate SNP studies such as these—in which a very small number of SNPs are analyzed—may miss other important genetic variation, cannot assess whether the identified associations may be due to additional SNPs in disequilibrium with the candidate SNPs, and require further validation in additional populations. Therefore, to shed further light on the relevance of genetic variation in MT and MTF1 to physiological control of metals, we were motivated to take a more systematic approach to exploring the associations of MT and MTF1 SNPs with urinary levels of Cd, Cu, and Zn.
METHODS
Study populations
For this study, data were pooled from participants recruited for two earlier studies: the Equol, Breast and Bone (EBB) study in Seattle, Washington (Atkinson et al. 2008a) and the New Mexico Metals (NMM) study in the Doña Ana County, New Mexico region (previously unpublished). Data were pooled for three reasons: (1) to increase sample size; (2) to increase the genetic variation included in the study; and (3) increase the ranges of urinary cadmium, copper, and zinc in the study population. All three of these factors would increase statistical power to observe associations.
EBB
The recruitment, exclusion criteria, and clinical protocols of the EBB study have been detailed elsewhere (Atkinson et al. 2008a; Atkinson et al. 2009). Briefly, premenopausal women aged 40–45 years were recruited from a mammographic screening program within Group Health (GH), an integrated healthcare system in Washington State. Based on self-report, peri- and postmenopausal women, women with a history of breast cancer, women with certain digestive conditions and women using antibiotics were also excluded. Study procedures were approved by the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (FHCRC) and GH Institutional Review Boards.
NMM
Women and men age 40–85 were recruited by promotoras (community health workers) employed by the La Clinica de Familia primary care clinic network in southern New Mexico. La Clinica de Familia is a non-profit organization serving approximately 6,500 low income and rural residents of the Doña Ana County, NM region. Participants were recruited in two time periods, 2011 and 2012. All participants provided written informed consent. Interviews were conducted in either English or Spanish.
Data Collection
Questionnaires
Participants in the EBB and NMM studies completed differing questionnaires that each included demographics and smoking history as well as other dietary, lifestyle, and health topics. Height and weight were measured in the clinic for EBB study participants and self-reported for NMM study participants. EBB study participants completed a self-administered questionnaire; NMM questionnaires were interviewer-assisted.
Urinary Metals
Participants in both studies provided spot urine samples collected in polyethylene collection cups. Samples were refrigerated, aliquoted, and stored at −70C until shipment for trace metals and creatinine analysis.
Urine samples were shipped frozen to the Trace Element Research Laboratory at the Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene (Madison, WI) for assay of a suite of 30 elements, including Cd, Cu, and Zn, quantified using magnetic-sector (high-resolution) inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry (SF-ICP-MS). A Finnigan, Element 2, magnetic sector ICP-MS, interfaced with an ESI FAST (SC-E2-DXS) high efficiency, low-flow nebulizer/autosampler, was employed. The complete analytical system was located within a trace metal clean room. This approach enabled accurate and precise quantification of low levels of elements in complex urine matrices. The signal-to-noise of SF-ICPMS is superior to that of quadrupole ICP-MS, and when operated in medium or high resolution modes, spectral interferences that compromise quantification of many elements in urine by traditional quadrupole ICP-MS, are eliminated. The formation of molybdenum oxide (MoO) is monitored throughout the analytical sequence, and where appropriate, a run position empirical correction is applied to the cadmium data. MoO formation was also evaluated with molybdenum stable isotope spikes in selected participant samples. Urine samples were diluted 1+5:6 and 1+9 with 2% (v/v) high purity 16M nitric acid (containing three internal standards) for analysis. A minimum of three replicate 180-second analyses were performed on each sample after a 60-second uptake and stabilization period. The ESI sample with a long rinse with 2% high purity nitric acid + 0.01% Triton between samples virtually eliminated carry-over. The typical SF-ICP-MS batch included 20 participant samples, 2 sample matrix spikes, 2 blank spikes, 3 certified reference materials (CSRMs, including NIST 2670a, UTAK, and Seronorm), 3 matrix blanks, 2 method blanks, 2 sample duplicates, and a set of check blanks and calibration verification checks run at frequent intervals during the batch sequence.
Urine creatinine was measured at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Public Health Sciences Biomarker Laboratory with a Roche Cobas Mira Plus Chemistry Analyzer using creatinine reagent set (cat no C7539, Pointe Scientific, Inc., Canton, MI), following manufacturer’s instructions. The Chemistry Analyzer was calibrated with the Pointe Scientific creatinine standard (cat no C7513-STD). Samples were run in duplicates; median duplicate coefficient of variation (CV) was 1.7%. Each batch of 20 participant samples were bracketed by both a low and a high quality control (QC) sample (Pointe Scientific Human urine control set, cat no P7582-CTL).
Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) selection
Several approaches were used to select SNPs. First, SNPs described in published reports related to cadmium were included (rs28366003, rs10636, and rs11076161)(Chen et al. 2012; Kayaalti et al. 2010; Kayaalti et al. 2011; Lei et al. 2012). Next we used the Genome Variation Server (GVS v. 7, dbSNP build 137; May 2012, current version: http://gvs.gs.washington.edu/GVS138/index.jsp)(Carlson et al. 2004) to identify tag SNPs, with bin correlation set to r2≥0.50, throughout the MT gene family and MTF1 regions and retaining SNPs with minor allele frequency (MAF) ≥ 15% within the HapMap CEU and MEX populations. We selected SNPs within ~2.5 kbp upstream of MT4A and ~4.2 kbp downstream of MT1X, i.e., ±3 kbp of the ~124 kbp region of chromosome 16 encoding the metallothionein (MT) gene family. MTF1 SNPs were selected from the beginning of the 5′ UTR to the end of the 3′ UTR (~50 kbp total length). A preliminary list of SNPs was optimized for Illumina Golden Gate sequencing technology, resulting in substitution of tag SNPs within the same “bin” to optimize the oligo pool assay (OPA) design score. In this process rs11076160 was substituted for rs11076161 (r2=1.0 and 0.96 in HapMap-CEU and MEX, respectively). A final list of 41 candidate SNPs comprising 35 tag bins (r2≥0.5) in MT genes and 5 SNPs comprising 5 bins in the MTF1 gene was generated for genotyping. In addition, participant genotypes of 24 SNPs designed as an ancestry informative marker (AIM) panel suitable for populations in the Americas(Kosoy et al. 2009) were assayed.
DNA preparation and genotyping
For EBB samples, DNA was extracted from the buffy coat fraction of a study blood sample using a Qiagen blood kit as described (Atkinson et al. 2008b; Yong et al. 2010). For NMM samples, saliva collected with OraGene OGR-500 kits (DNA Genotek Inc, Ontario, Canada) and DNA extracted in the FHCRC Specimen Processing Laboratory. Previous studies have demonstrated the concordance of genotypes obtained with DNA from blood and saliva (Abraham et al. 2012).
DNA was genotyped using Illumina’s GoldenGate Genotyping assay on the VeraCode Platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA) (Shen et al. 2005) following manufacturer recommendation (VeraCode Assay Guide 11312819 rev A1). In brief, 250 ng of genomic DNA was aliquoted into 96-well plates, processed accordingly and scanned on the BeadXpress reader, using GenomeStudio (v2011.1) software.
We conducted a series of quality control (QC) procedures as follows. Prior to running the study samples, 90 samples representing 30 parent-parent-child CEPH trios (Utah residents with ancestry from northern and western Europe)(Thorisson et al. 2005) were genotyped to assess performance of the Illumina OPA. Assay accuracy was verified by comparing genotypes to publicly available genotype data for these samples from HapMap (http://www.hapmap.org/), 1000Genomes (http://www.1000genomes.org), dbSNP (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP/), and by assessing inheritance errors. Two external control samples from the HapMap project were included on each plate to confirm reliability and reproducibility of the genotyping across the study plates. Intra- and inter-plate duplicates comprised >10% of all samples. Laboratory personnel were blinded to all research information about the samples. Other QC procedures included use of barcodes on samples and plates, dedicated materials and working space, and visual review of 96 SNP cluster plots by two laboratory staff members. Samples with weak signals, discordant duplicates, and outliers were repeated at least once.
Sample sequence call rates were >85%. Two SNPs (rs11076160 and rs2018703) failed to cluster and were excluded. Among successfully genotyped SNPs (69 of 71), SNP call rates were >95%. Linkage disequilibrium between SNPs was examined by uploading genotype data to GVS; one pair of SNPs with r2>0.8 and 9 pairs with r2>0.5 not in the same bin during selection were identified and retained for genotyping assays. Of 39 SNPs in the MT region, 38 were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE; P>0.01); rs1599823 was the exception. All 5 SNPs in MTF1 were in HWE (P>0.01). AIM panel SNPs were not tested for HWE.
Statistical analysis
Exclusions
Participants in either study who did not consent to future genetic samples were excluded from genotyping (N=19) as were men in the NMM study, and one woman with unknown smoking history.
Principal component analysis (PCA) of AIM panel
Genotypes were coded as 0, 1, or 2 for homozygote major allele, heterozygote, and homozygote minor allele respectively. We then conducted PCA on 18 of the 24 AIM panel genotypes to generate 18 orthogonal eigenvectors. Six AIM SNPs were excluded from PCA because the assay failed in some participants (1 AIM SNP failed in 1 participant, 5 failed in 2 participants, 1 failed in 9 participants), which would exclude these participants from further analyses. Comparison of PCA results with 18 or 24 AIM SNPs among participants with data on all 24 AIM SNPs were similar. Scree plots of PCA eigenvectors indicated that the first 3 components were sufficient to capture most variation within the AIM panel; we therefore included 3 components as adjustment covariates in statistical analyses of MT and MTF1 SNPs in association with urinary metals. We also repeated urinary metals analyses with the first 5 PCA components instead of 3.
Association of SNPs with urinary metals
In our primary analysis, data from both studies were pooled and multivariable linear regression with robust standard errors was used to estimate the association of each MT and MTF1 SNP with urinary cadmium (U-Cd), copper (U-Cu), and zinc (U-Zn), adjusted for age, smoking history (never or ever), the three largest components from PCA of the AIMs, urinary creatinine, and study. Genotypes were treated as categorical variables with three levels, and in separate analyses, per-allele trend was evaluated. In all analyses the referent category was the homozygote of the major allele. P-values for the regression coefficient of each urinary metal comparing the homozygote minor allele compared to homozygote major allele (P(mm)), and for the per-allele trend (P(trend)), were obtained from t-tests of the null hypothesis that the linear regression coefficient was zero. Our primary criteria for evaluating association was the value of P(mm).
In additional analyses, the associations of each MT or MTF1 SNP with U-Cd, U-Cu, and U-Zn, were estimated separately in the EBB study and NMM study. To evaluate whether associations differed significantly between the two study samples, for SNPs with significantly associated with any metal in the pooled sample, we repeated analysis in a separate model that included an interaction term between the independent variable describing the per-allele trend in genotype and the variable indicating the study (EBB or NMM). The P-value of this term is denoted Pint(study). Hence, this analysis was designed to identify SNPs for which the association between the number of minor alleles and urinary metal(s) differed between studies.
Inclusion of creatinine as a separate variable, as opposed to direct normalization of each participant’s urinary metal concentration, has been recommended for heterogeneous study samples such as ours (Barr et al. 2005).
In sensitivity analyses, directly creatinine-normalized urinary metal concentrations were used instead of including creatinine as a separate variable; and log-transformed urinary metals and creatinine were used in place of non-transformed variables.
Nominal statistical significance was initially set to P<0.05, and uncorrected P values and confidence intervals estimated. Of 39 MT SNPs evaluated, four were in LD (r2>0.8) with one or more other SNPs (Supplemental Figure 1), leaving 35 approximately independent tests of association within each metal. None of the 5 MTF1 SNPs evaluated were in LD.
Ethics
This study was reviewed and approved by Institutional Review Board at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. The EBB study and NMM study were also reviewed by the IRB of GH Research Institute and New Mexico State University, respectively.
RESULTS
A total of 321 women were included in this study from Seattle (EBB study) and New Mexico (Table 1). Mean urinary metals and creatinine were higher in NMM participants than in EBB study participants. NM women were older and had higher BMI than EBB women; the large majority of women in both samples were white, but NM were nearly all Hispanic while EBB women were predominantly non-Hispanic.
Table 1.
Selected participant characteristics according to study site, Equol, Breast, and Bone study (EBB) or New Mexico Metals study (NMM). All participants are women.
| EBB (Seattle, WA) (N=170) | NMM (Las Cruces, NM) (N=151) | |
|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) or N (%) | Mean (SD) or N (%) | |
| Age (y) | 42.4 (1.4) | 52.5 (9.1) |
| Ever-smoker | 54 (32%) | 38 (25%) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | ||
| <25 | 86 (51%) | 22 (15%) |
| 25–29.9 | 52 (31%) | 65 (43%) |
| 30- | 32 (19%) | 63 (42%) |
| Hispanica | ||
| No | 164 (96%) | <10 |
| Yes | <10 | 145 (96%) |
| Racea | ||
| White | 151 (89%) | 139 (92%) |
| Asian / Pacific Islander | 13 (8%) | 0 |
| Otherb | <10 | 11 (7%) |
| Urinary cadmium | 0.25 (0.30) | 0.46 (0.54) |
| Urinary copper | 5.7 (5.2) | 11.1 (13.3) |
| Urinary zinc | 183.5 (222.8) | 440.2 (388.5) |
| Urinary creatinine | 62.4 (53.0) | 112.9 (69.5) |
Numbers do not sum to total due to missing values.
African-American, American Indian / Alaska Native, or self-identified Other or “mixed”.
Pooling both study samples, the median MAF of SNPs included in the study was 27%. As a result, for each of 24 SNPs, N=20 or more participants were minor allele homozygotes. In addition, the prevalence of 14 MT SNPs and 3 MTF1 SNPs differed significantly between participants from Seattle and New Mexico, but for only 2 SNPs were all minor allele homozygotes from a single study (Table 2).
Table 2.
Genotype frequencies in study participants according to study. Major allele (M) and minor allele (m) were assigned based on frequency in the combined study samples.
| SNP | M | m | EBB (N=170)
|
NMM (N=151)
|
Pa | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MM | Mm | mm | MM | Mm | mm | ||||
| % | % | % | % | % | % | ||||
| MT gene region | |||||||||
| rs282231 | A | G | 85 | 15 | 0 | 83 | 17 | 0 | 0.64 |
| rs2113315 | A | G | 35 | 45 | 19 | 38 | 48 | 14 | 0.42 |
| rs1566441 | G | T | 24 | 52 | 24 | 32 | 46 | 21 | 0.20 |
| rs182221 b | G | C | 63 | 32 | 5 | 69 | 29 | 2 | 0.31 |
| rs396230 | A | G | 69 | 28 | 2 | 72 | 28 | 1 | 0.47 |
| rs604639 | A | G | 55 | 40 | 5 | 60 | 35 | 5 | 0.66 |
| rs1909749 | G | A | 44 | 44 | 12 | 64 | 28 | 7 | 0.00 |
| rs6499843 | G | A | 72 | 26 | 2 | 53 | 39 | 8 | 0.00 |
| rs11644094 | A | G | 33 | 49 | 18 | 45 | 46 | 9 | 0.02 |
| rs12444489 | C | T | 61 | 34 | 5 | 60 | 33 | 7 | 0.76 |
| rs4784693 | C | T | 78 | 19 | 3 | 72 | 27 | 1 | 0.10 |
| rs8052106 b | A | G | 49 | 41 | 10 | 45 | 40 | 15 | 0.37 |
| rs4784695 | G | T | 75 | 25 | 0 | 75 | 24 | 1 | 0.32 |
| rs1008766 | G | C | 23 | 47 | 30 | 41 | 40 | 19 | 0.00 |
| rs28366003 | A | G | 88 | 12 | 0 | 84 | 15 | 1 | 0.37 |
| rs10636 | G | C | 54 | 42 | 4 | 62 | 34 | 4 | 0.33 |
| rs11642055 b | G | A | 72 | 25 | 3 | 78 | 21 | 1 | 0.22 |
| rs904773 | A | C | 66 | 31 | 2 | 54 | 36 | 9 | 0.01 |
| rs2001985 | T | G | 66 | 31 | 2 | 54 | 36 | 9 | 0.01 |
| rs7403881 | G | C | 27 | 48 | 25 | 23 | 59 | 18 | 0.14 |
| rs708274 | G | T | 67 | 29 | 4 | 72 | 26 | 1 | 0.26 |
| rs2270836 | C | T | 39 | 47 | 14 | 26 | 52 | 21 | 0.04 |
| rs8049883 | G | A | 67 | 28 | 5 | 72 | 26 | 2 | 0.36 |
| rs904777 | C | G | 32 | 54 | 14 | 38 | 50 | 12 | 0.59 |
| rs1001362 | G | A | 74 | 22 | 4 | 72 | 26 | 2 | 0.57 |
| rs1599823 b | G | A | 34 | 60 | 6 | 37 | 54 | 10 | 0.44 |
| rs8044719 | G | T | 75 | 22 | 3 | 72 | 27 | 1 | 0.40 |
| rs2070839 | C | T | 44 | 46 | 10 | 31 | 51 | 18 | 0.03 |
| rs12232396 | C | T | 62 | 34 | 4 | 77 | 22 | 1 | 0.01 |
| rs2291957 | G | T | 54 | 39 | 7 | 48 | 46 | 5 | 0.37 |
| rs12708962 | G | A | 46 | 44 | 10 | 30 | 54 | 15 | 0.01 |
| rs4784706 | G | A | 74 | 21 | 5 | 74 | 23 | 3 | 0.59 |
| rs1587479 b | G | T | 43 | 47 | 10 | 38 | 54 | 7 | 0.38 |
| rs1875230 | C | A | 55 | 39 | 6 | 52 | 46 | 2 | 0.13 |
| rs4783950 | T | C | 38 | 46 | 16 | 19 | 54 | 28 | 0.00 |
| rs4531729 | T | C | 33 | 42 | 25 | 46 | 46 | 8 | 0.00 |
| rs1599933 | T | G | 34 | 49 | 17 | 25 | 50 | 25 | 0.10 |
| rs2301234 | G | T | 39 | 50 | 11 | 50 | 46 | 4 | 0.03 |
| rs11076164 | T | C | 28 | 42 | 29 | 35 | 52 | 13 | 0.00 |
| MTF-1 | |||||||||
| rs28411034 | G | A | 50 | 39 | 11 | 68 | 29 | 3 | 0.00 |
| rs4653329 | G | T | 54 | 40 | 6 | 47 | 46 | 7 | 0.44 |
| rs3790626 | T | C | 46 | 39 | 14 | 34 | 54 | 12 | 0.03 |
| rs17732614 | A | G | 81 | 18 | 1 | 74 | 25 | 1 | 0.32 |
| rs12743834 | C | T | 34 | 46 | 19 | 19 | 60 | 21 | 0.01 |
P for difference between EBB and NMM study samples (Pearson’s χ2 test)
SNP failed genotyping in <5% of study participants who were therefore excluded for this SNP.
Several SNPs in the MT gene region were significantly associated with one or more of U-Cd, U-Cu, and U-Zn concentrations adjusted for age, creatinine, study site, AIM principal components, and smoking history. Notably, minor alleles of rs28366003 and rs10636, located within 1 kbp of one another and in weak LD (r2<0.2), were associated with lower urinary concentrations of all three metals.
Minor alleles of rs4784706 were significantly associated with lower U-Cd and U-Cu and associated with lower U-Zn, although the association with U-Zn did not reach statistical significance. rs8044719 was associated solely with lower U-Cd, although homozygosity in the minor allele of nearby rs1599823 (3 kbp) was associated with lower U-Zn.
Minor alleles of rs12444489 were significantly associated with U-Cu and U-Zn but not U-Cd. Finally, homozygosity for minor alleles at rs2301234 and rs8052106 were associated only with lower U-Cu.
One SNP within the MTF1 gene, rs4653329, was associated with lower U-Cd, but no associations between this SNP and other metals were observed (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Mean difference in urinary Cd, Cu, and Zn concentrations (μg/L) associated with selected metallothionein (MT) gene region and metal-regulatory transcription factor 1 (MTF1) single nucleotide polymorphisms. Shading is for clarity.
a Approximate relative location of MT genes (chromosome 16) and MTF1 gene (chromosome 1). The MT region is ~125 kbp. The MTF1 region is ~50 kbp.
b Mean difference in urinary metal comparing homozygote minor to homozygote major alleles (referent), adjusted for age, study site, urinary creatinine, smoking (never/ever), and the largest three principal components of the ancestry informative marker panel. Difference >0 indicates homozygote minor alleles is associated with higher mean urinary metal.
c P(mm) is P-value for comparison of mean urinary metal between homozygote major to homozygote minor alleles.
d P-value for trend in urinary metals with number of minor alleles.
e Comparing heterozygotes to homozygotes because no homozygotes with minor alleles were included in the study sample.
For each SNP identified as associated with urinary metals in the pooled study sample, analysis was repeated separately in each study population, testing for a difference in association between study sites (Figure 2). Results showed that for all SNPs except rs28366003, associated with U-Cd, and rs1599823, associated with U-Zn, the associations in each study were consistent with the pooled results.
Figure 2.
Pooled results and results from each study (Equol, Breast and Bone (EBB) and New Mexico Metals (NMM)), showing the association of trend in minor alleles with urinary metals (β(trend)), for SNPs significantly associated with one or more urinary metal concentrations in the primary analysis (Figure 1). Pint(study) is the P-value of the interaction between study and the SNP, in association with urinary metals; Pint(study)>0.05 indicates no significant difference between studies. Shading is for clarity.
a Results for heterozygotes are plotted because of small number of homozygotes of the minor allele
Results were not sensitive to changes in analyses including adjustment for smoking status as never, former, or current rather than never or ever smoking; additional adjustment for body mass index; direct normalization to urinary creatinine by dividing urinary metals by creatinine prior to statistical models; use of log-transformed urinary metals and creatinine; and adjustment for 5 rather than 3 PCA components of the AIM panel. We elected to present non-log-transformed metal concentrations to ease interpretation.
DISCUSSION
In this study we observed several SNPs in the region encoding MT genes that were suggestively associated with urinary concentrations of Cd, Cu, and Zn. In particular the region encoding MT2A, the isoform expressed in a number of tissues in humans, appeared to be a “hot spot” for modulation of urinary Cd, Cu, and Zn. In addition, one SNP in MTF1 was associated with lower urinary Cd but not Cu or Zn.
Previous studies have examined MT gene variation primarily in association with blood or urine levels of Cd, Cu, or Zn using a candidate-SNP approach(Chen et al. 2012; Kayaalti et al. 2011; Lei et al. 2012; Raudenska et al. 2014; Wang et al. 2012). In particular, rs28366003, a A/G substitution in the promoter region of MT2A which may influence expression levels(Kita et al. 2006; Krzeslak et al. 2013), has been examined in several prior studies and associated with elevated metals in kidney (Kayaalti et al. 2010) and inconsistently in blood (Chen et al. 2012; Kayaalti et al. 2011; Lei et al. 2012) but not urine Cd (Chen et al. 2012). Nonetheless, elevated kidney Cd should result in elevated urinary Cd, and our results for MT2A SNPs thus stand in apparent contrast to the earlier study (Kayaalti et al. 2010). The relationship between blood, urine, and kidney tissue Cd is complex and likely depends on MT binding of Cd during filtration (Raudenska et al. 2014; Sabolic et al. 2010). Thus, genetic polymorphisms that may alter MT expression levels may not influence concentrations of metals in different biological matrices in the same manner. Furthermore, our study was conducted among populations in the USA with relatively low exposure in comparison to others (Chen et al. 2012; Lei et al. 2012; Wang et al. 2012), which may modify the influence of MT polymorphisms on blood and urine metal concentrations (Lei et al. 2012).
The minor allele (G) of rs28366003 is rare in the white population of North America (McElroy et al. 2010), and our study included only one homozygote for the minor allele; the association we observed with reduced urinary Cd, Cu, and Zn must be interpreted cautiously. Heterozygotes at rs28366003 also had lower U-Cd than AA homozygotes, although the difference was not statistically significant. However, nearby SNPs rs4784695 and rs10636 were in weak LD with rs28366003 (r2~0.4 and 0.1 respectively), and also showed suggestive associations with lower urinary metals for homozygotes of the minor allele. Thus, overall, we believe our results are consistent with earlier candidate SNP studies in showing that genetic variation in this region near MT2A influences urinary excretion of metals that bind MT.
Previous reports have also implicated the SNP rs11076161 in MT1A with blood Cd(Chen et al. 2012; Lei et al. 2012), albeit weakly. We attempted to include rs11076160, a SNP in LD with rs11076161 (r2~1); unfortunately it failed genotyping. Other SNPs within ±5 kbp of MT1A in our study include those between rs2270836 and rs8044719 (Figure 1), and include two suggestive associations with lower U-Cd and U-Zn.
To our knowledge, genetic variation in MTF1 has not been investigated in association with a measure of exposure to metals such as urinary concentrations. MTF1 is a transcription factor that controls expression of MT and many other genes in response to metal ions including Cd, Cu, and Zn.(Jiang et al. 2003; Sims et al. 2012; Troadec et al. 2010) The SNP we identified, rs4653329, is located in an intron and thus its functional significance is unclear. Nonetheless, our MTF1 results suggest that genetic variation in transcriptional factors that regulate MTs is relevant to understanding physiological response to metals. Notably, the MT2A SNP rs28366003 is in the promoter region of MT2A. Thus, genetic variation in regulation of expression of MTs may emerge as the most important way in which genetic variation influences response to metals, in contrast to variation that directly modulates MT function. Future studies might be aimed at the entire pathway or network that includes MTs as well as their regulatory factors.
Some limitations to our study should be considered in interpreting the results, including the modest sample size in this exploratory study. In addition, we measured Cd, Cu, and Zn in spot urine samples as opposed to 24-hour collection, which may have introduced more variation and attenuated observed associations(Gunier et al. 2013); however, metals assessment in spot urines compares well to 24-hour samples (Akerstrom et al. 2014). Urinary Cd is generally accepted as a measure of cumulative Cd exposure (Adams and Newcomb 2014; Akerstrom et al. 2013; Lauwerys et al. 1979), and some evidence supports urinary Zn as a measure of intake (Lowe et al. 2009), but the usefulness of urinary Cu as a biomarker of Cu intake or exposure is less clear (Harvey et al. 2009). This may in part explain why our results generally showed weaker associations with urinary Cu than with Cd or Zn.
Finally, for our study we pooled two study samples from different populations that differ in racial and ethnic characteristics, and possibly exposure to Cd, Cu, and Zn. This is a common approach in genetic studies (Rentschler et al. 2013; Rentschler et al. 2014), and although we adjusted for ancestry and source study, we cannot exclude the possibility of residual confounding by unknown factors that differ by the genotypes examined, and between study samples. However, the associations we observed, with two exceptions, were consistent between the very different populations in our study, and this consistency is additional evidence that the associations are not due to differences between the populations.
CONCLUSIONS
In summary, the results of our study suggest that genetic variation in the region encoding functional MT genes may influence urinary levels of metals including Cd, Zn, and Cu. Our study is the first to systematically survey this region of the genome in association with an important toxic metal, Cd, or with Cu and Zn, two metals with critical physiological roles as well as toxicity at high doses. We also observed that variation in MTF1, which regulates transcription of MT as well as other metal-related genes, may influence U-Cd, a measure of Cd accumulation in the kidneys. Thus our results should motivate future studies of the role of genetic variation in biomarkers of metal exposure, the association of metal exposure with health outcomes, and the interaction of genetic variation and environmental metals exposure in pathological processes (Raudenska et al. 2014).
Supplementary Material
Highlights.
Genetic variation in metallothionein (MT) genes was assessed in two diverse populations
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in MT genes were associated with mean urinary Cd, Cu and Zn
Genetic variation may influence biomarkers of exposure, and associations of exposure with health
Acknowledgments
Funding. This research was supported by NIH grants U54CA132381, U54CA132383 (New Mexico Metals study), R01CA097366 (Equol, Breast and Bone study), and U01CA63731 (Group Health Breast Cancer Screening Program). The funding sources played no role in the design, conduct, or reporting of the study.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest statement. The authors state that they have no real or potential conflicts of interest that could have influenced this research.
Human subjects. This research was reviewed and approved by institutional review boards at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and New Mexico State University. All participants provided written informed consent.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- Abraham JE, Maranian MJ, Spiteri I, Russell R, Ingle S, Luccarini C, et al. Saliva samples are a viable alternative to blood samples as a source of DNA for high throughput genotyping. BMC Med Genomics. 2012;5:19. doi: 10.1186/1755-8794-5-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Adams SV, Newcomb PA. Cadmium blood and urine concentrations as measures of exposure: NHANES 1999–2010. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2014;24(2):163–170. doi: 10.1038/jes.2013.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Akerstrom M, Barregard L, Lundh T, Sallsten G. The relationship between cadmium in kidney and cadmium in urine and blood in an environmentally exposed population. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2013;268(3):286–293. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2013.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Akerstrom M, Barregard L, Lundh T, Sallsten G. Variability of urinary cadmium excretion in spot urine samples, first morning voids, and 24 h urine in a healthy non-smoking population: implications for study design. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2014;24(2):171–179. doi: 10.1038/jes.2013.58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Atkinson C, Newton KM, Bowles EJ, Yong M, Lampe JW. Demographic, anthropometric, and lifestyle factors and dietary intakes in relation to daidzein-metabolizing phenotypes among premenopausal women in the United States. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008a;87(3):679–687. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/87.3.679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Atkinson C, Newton KM, Stanczyk FZ, Westerlind KC, Li L, Lampe JW. Daidzein-metabolizing phenotypes in relation to serum hormones and sex hormone binding globulin, and urinary estrogen metabolites in premenopausal women in the United States. Cancer Causes Control. 2008b;19(10):1085–1093. doi: 10.1007/s10552-008-9172-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Atkinson C, Newton KM, Aiello Bowles EJ, Lehman CD, Stanczyk FZ, Westerlind KC, et al. Daidzein-metabolizing phenotypes in relation to mammographic breast density among premenopausal women in the United States. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;116(3):587–594. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0199-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Babula P, Masarik M, Adam V, Eckschlager T, Stiborova M, Trnkova L, et al. Mammalian metallothioneins: properties and functions. Metallomics. 2012;4(8):739–750. doi: 10.1039/c2mt20081c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barr DB, Wilder LC, Caudill SP, Gonzalez AJ, Needham LL, Pirkle JL. Urinary creatinine concentrations in the U.S. population: implications for urinary biologic monitoring measurements. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113(2):192–200. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bremner I, Beattie JH. Metallothionein and the trace minerals. Annu Rev Nutr. 1990;10:63–83. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nu.10.070190.000431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carlson CS, Eberle MA, Rieder MJ, Yi Q, Kruglyak L, Nickerson DA. Selecting a maximally informative set of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for association analyses using linkage disequilibrium. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;74(1):106–120. doi: 10.1086/381000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carrasco J, Adlard P, Cotman C, Quintana A, Penkowa M, Xu F, et al. Metallothionein-I and -III expression in animal models of Alzheimer disease. Neuroscience. 2006;143(4):911–922. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.08.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen HI, Chiu YW, Hsu YK, Li WF, Chen YC, Chuang HY. The association of metallothionein-4 gene polymorphism and renal function in long-term lead-exposed workers. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2010;137(1):55–62. doi: 10.1007/s12011-009-8564-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen X, Lei L, Tian L, Zhu G, Jin T. Bone mineral density and polymorphisms in metallothionein 1A and 2A in a Chinese population exposed to cadmium. Sci Total Environ. 2012;423:12–17. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Forma E, Krzeslak A, Wilkosz J, Jozwiak P, Szymczyk A, Rozanski W, et al. Metallothionein 2A genetic polymorphisms and risk of prostate cancer in a Polish population. Cancer Genet. 2012;205(9):432–435. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2012.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Giacconi R, Cipriano C, Muti E, Costarelli L, Maurizio C, Saba V, et al. Novel -209A/G MT2A polymorphism in old patients with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerosis: relationship with inflammation (IL-6) and zinc. Biogerontology. 2005;6(6):407–413. doi: 10.1007/s10522-005-4907-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Giacconi R, Muti E, Malavolta M, Cipriano C, Costarelli L, Bernardini G, et al. The +838 C/G MT2A polymorphism, metals, and the inflammatory/immune response in carotid artery stenosis in elderly people. Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass) 2007;13(7–8):388–395. doi: 10.2119/2007-00045.Giacconi. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goulding H, Jasani B, Pereira H, Reid A, Galea M, Bell JA, et al. Metallothionein expression in human breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1995;72(4):968–972. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1995.443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gunier RB, Horn-Ross PL, Canchola AJ, Duffy CN, Reynolds P, Hertz A, et al. Determinants and Within-Person Variability of Urinary Cadmium Concentrations among Women in Northern California. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121(6):643–649. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1205524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hamer DH. Metallothionein. Annu Rev Biochem. 1986;55:913–951. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.55.070186.004405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harvey LJ, Ashton K, Hooper L, Casgrain A, Fairweather-Tait SJ. Methods of assessment of copper status in humans: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89(6):2009S–2024S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.27230E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hayashi Y, Hashizume T, Wakida K, Satoh M, Uchida Y, Watabe K, et al. Association between metallothionein genes polymorphisms and sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in a Japanese population. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2006;7(1):22–26. doi: 10.1080/14660820600618766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Isani G, Carpene E. Metallothioneins, unconventional proteins from unconventional animals: a long journey from nematodes to mammals. Biomolecules. 2014;4(2):435–457. doi: 10.3390/biom4020435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang H, Daniels PJ, Andrews GK. Putative zinc-sensing zinc fingers of metal-response element-binding transcription factor-1 stabilize a metal-dependent chromatin complex on the endogenous metallothionein-I promoter. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(32):30394–30402. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M303598200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kayaalti Z, Mergen G, Soylemezoglu T. Effect of metallothionein core promoter region polymorphism on cadmium, zinc and copper levels in autopsy kidney tissues from a Turkish population. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2010;245(2):252–255. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2010.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kayaalti Z, Aliyev V, Soylemezoglu T. The potential effect of metallothionein 2A -5A/G single nucleotide polymorphism on blood cadmium, lead, zinc and copper levels. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2011;256(1):1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2011.06.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kelley SL, Basu A, Teicher BA, Hacker MP, Hamer DH, Lazo JS. Overexpression of metallothionein confers resistance to anticancer drugs. Science. 1988;241(4874):1813–1815. doi: 10.1126/science.3175622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim HG, Kim JY, Han EH, Hwang YP, Choi JH, Park BH, et al. Metallothionein-2A overexpression increases the expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and invasion of breast cancer cells. FEBS Lett. 2011;585(2):421–428. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.12.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kita K, Miura N, Yoshida M, Yamazaki K, Ohkubo T, Imai Y, et al. Potential effect on cellular response to cadmium of a single-nucleotide A --> G polymorphism in the promoter of the human gene for metallothionein IIA. Hum Genet. 2006;120(4):553–560. doi: 10.1007/s00439-006-0238-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klaassen CD, Liu J. Role of metallothionein in cadmium-induced hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity. Drug Metab Rev. 1997;29(1–2):79–102. doi: 10.3109/03602539709037574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kosoy R, Nassir R, Tian C, White PA, Butler LM, Silva G, et al. Ancestry informative marker sets for determining continental origin and admixture proportions in common populations in America. Hum Mutat. 2009;30(1):69–78. doi: 10.1002/humu.20822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krzeslak A, Forma E, Jozwiak P, Szymczyk A, Smolarz B, Romanowicz-Makowska H, et al. Metallothionein 2A genetic polymorphisms and risk of ductal breast cancer. Clin Exp Med. 2012 doi: 10.1007/s10238-012-0215-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krzeslak A, Forma E, Chwatko G, Jozwiak P, Szymczyk A, Wilkosz J, et al. Effect of metallothionein 2A gene polymorphism on allele-specific gene expression and metal content in prostate cancer. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2013;268(3):278–285. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2013.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lauwerys R, Roels H, Regniers M, Buchet JP, Bernard A, Goret A. Significance of cadmium concentration in blood and in urine in workers exposed to cadmium. Environ Res. 1979;20(2):375–391. doi: 10.1016/0013-9351(79)90014-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lei L, Chang X, Rentschler G, Tian L, Zhu G, Chen X, et al. A polymorphism in metallothionein 1A (MT1A) is associated with cadmium-related excretion of urinary beta 2-microglobulin. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2012;265(3):373–379. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2012.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lowe NM, Fekete K, Decsi T. Methods of assessment of zinc status in humans: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89(6):2040S–2051S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.27230G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luo Y, Xu Y, Bao Q, Ding Z, Zhu C, Huang ZX, et al. The molecular mechanism for human metallothionein-3 to protect against the neuronal cytotoxicity of Abeta(1–42) with Cu ions. J Biol Inorg Chem. 2013;18(1):39–47. doi: 10.1007/s00775-012-0947-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McElroy JA, Bryda EC, McKay SD, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF. Genetic variation at a metallothionein 2A promoter single-nucleotide polymorphism in white and black females in Midwestern United States. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2010;73(19):1283–1287. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2010.485067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Palmiter RD. Regulation of metallothionein genes by heavy metals appears to be mediated by a zinc-sensitive inhibitor that interacts with a constitutively active transcription factor, MTF-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91(4):1219–1223. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.4.1219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Palmiter RD. The elusive function of metallothioneins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(15):8428–8430. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.15.8428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raudenska M, Gumulec J, Podlaha O, Sztalmachova M, Babula P, Eckschlager T, et al. Metallothionein polymorphisms in pathological processes. Metallomics. 2014;6(1):55–68. doi: 10.1039/c3mt00132f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rentschler G, Kippler M, Axmon A, Raqib R, Ekstrom EC, Skerfving S, et al. Polymorphisms in iron homeostasis genes and urinary cadmium concentrations among nonsmoking women in Argentina and Bangladesh. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121(4):467–472. 472e461–467. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1205672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rentschler G, Kippler M, Axmon A, Raqib R, Skerfving S, Vahter M, et al. Cadmium concentrations in human blood and urine are associated with polymorphisms in zinc transporter genes. Metallomics. 2014 doi: 10.1039/c3mt00365e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sabolic I, Breljak D, Skarica M, Herak-Kramberger CM. Role of metallothionein in cadmium traffic and toxicity in kidneys and other mammalian organs. Biometals. 2010;23(5):897–926. doi: 10.1007/s10534-010-9351-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shen R, Fan JB, Campbell D, Chang W, Chen J, Doucet D, et al. High-throughput SNP genotyping on universal bead arrays. Mutat Res. 2005;573(1–2):70–82. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sims HI, Chirn GW, Marr MT., 2nd Single nucleotide in the MTF-1 binding site can determine metal-specific transcription activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(41):16516–16521. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1207737109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Starska K, Krzeslak A, Forma E, Olszewski J, Lewy-Trenda I, Osuch-Wojcikiewicz E, et al. Genetic polymorphism of metallothionein 2A and risk of laryngeal cancer in a Polish population. Med Oncol. 2014;31(7):75. doi: 10.1007/s12032-014-0075-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thorisson GA, Smith AV, Krishnan L, Stein LD. The International HapMap Project Web site. Genome Res. 2005;15(11):1592–1593. doi: 10.1101/gr.4413105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Troadec MB, Ward DM, Lo E, Kaplan J, De Domenico I. Induction of FPN1 transcription by MTF-1 reveals a role for ferroportin in transition metal efflux. Blood. 2010;116(22):4657–4664. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-04-278614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vasak M, Meloni G. Chemistry and biology of mammalian metallothioneins. J Biol Inorg Chem. 2011;16(7):1067–1078. doi: 10.1007/s00775-011-0799-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y, Goodrich JM, Gillespie B, Werner R, Basu N, Franzblau A. An investigation of modifying effects of metallothionein single-nucleotide polymorphisms on the association between mercury exposure and biomarker levels. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120(4):530–534. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1104079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang L, Li H, Yu T, Zhao H, Cherian MG, Cai L, et al. Polymorphisms in metallothionein-1 and -2 genes associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2008;294(5):E987–992. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.90234.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yong M, Schwartz SM, Atkinson C, Makar KW, Thomas SS, Newton KM, et al. Associations between polymorphisms in glucuronidation and sulfation enzymes and mammographic breast density in premenopausal women in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19(2):537–546. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zavras AI, Yoon AJ, Chen MK, Lin CW, Yang SF. Metallothionein-1 Genotypes in the Risk of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1431-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


