Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2015 Dec 23;3(6):e01485-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01485-15

Draft Genome Sequence of “Candidatus Bacteroides periocalifornicus,” a New Member of the Bacteriodetes Phylum Found within the Oral Microbiome of Periodontitis Patients

Jeffrey S McLean a,, Quanhui Liu a, John Thompson b, Anna Edlund c,d, Scott Kelley b,
PMCID: PMC4691655  PMID: 26701081

Abstract

Here we present the draft genome of a distantly related member within the phylum Bacteriodetes, “Candidatus Bacteroides periocalifornicus.” The draft genome sequence was assembled with metagenomic data from a patient with periodontitis. The closest relative has less than 68% average nucleic identity, supporting a novel family within Bacteriodetes.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Periodontal disease is a chronic progressive disease that affects an estimated 5% to 20% of the world's population (1) and has been identified as risk factor for heart disease (2, 3). Periodontal biofilms include numerous pathogens and become increasingly complex at the disease worsens (4). Although periodontal biofilms occur in one of the most heavily investigated microbial ecosystems, the precise relationship between the periodontal biofilm microbes and the severity of the disease is still a hot topic of research. Furthermore, a large percentage of the microbes associated with the oral cavity and periodontal disease remain uncharacterized (57). Here, we report the identification and phylogenetic placement of a draft microbial genome assembled from shotgun sequencing data derived from a patient with severe periodontitis.

Sample collection and DNA isolation were performed as described previously (7). Briefly, following the clinical examination, microbial samples were collected from the two deepest periodontal pockets of the dentition using a periodontal scaler. DNA was extracted with the NucleoSpin tissue nucleic acid and protein purification kit (Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co, Germany). A total of 24 paired-end Illumina libraries from 12 subjects before and after treatment were sequenced on a HiSeq 2000 sequencer (Illumina Inc.) (2 × 100 bp).

All quality-trimmed reads were de novo assembled using SPAdes v 2.40 (8, 9). Contigs from each library were taxonomically classified based on a machine learning algorithm using MG Taxa (http://mgtaxa.jcvi.org/) as described previously (10). Several large scaffolds in a number of libraries were originally classified at a low score to uncultivated phylum OD1, indicating they were distantly related to any previously sequenced genome. Scaffolds representing the novel genome were then extracted from a single library and inspected for kmer frequency consistency and used for further analyses.

The draft genome is 2.53 Mb with an overall GC content of 59.4%. Gene annotation using the Prokaryotic Genome Automatic Annotation Pipeline (PGAAP) provided by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) identified a total of 1,875 genes, consisting of 1,678 coding sequences, 39 tRNAs, and 1 rRNA operon (5S). A set of 31 single-copy genes were extracted and aligned to 78 sequenced genomes using AMPHORA2 (11). The resulting likelihood-based tree was built from 31 concatenated genes and indicated relatedness to the Bacteriodetes phylum; however, the closest genome was Alistipes putredinis, with an average nucleotide identity of 68% (12). These results support that the genome represents a novel family member within the Bacteriodetes phylum, and the name “Candidatus Bacteroides periocalifornicus” is proposed.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession number LIIK00000000. The version described in this paper is version LIIK01000000.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work received financial support from the following sources: NIH (PHS HHS) grant U26IHS300292 (to S.K.); a K99 Pathway to Independence Ward grant (K99DE024543) (to A.E.); and NIH (NIDCR) grants R01DE023810 (to J.S.M.) and NIGMS R01GM095373 (to J.S.M.).

Footnotes

Citation McLean JS, Liu Q, Thompson J, Edlund A, Kelley S. 2015. Draft genome sequence of “Candidatus Bacteroides periocalifornicus,” a new member of the Bacteriodetes phylum found within the oral microbiome of periodontitis patients. Genome Announc 3(6):e01485-15. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01485-15.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Petersen PE, Bourgeois D, Ogawa H, Estupinan-Day S, Ndiaye C. 2005. The global burden of oral diseases and risks to oral health. Bull World Health Organ 83:661–669. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Genco RJ, Borgnakke WS. 2013. Risk factors for periodontal disease. Periodontology 2000 62:59–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2012.00457.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cullinan MP, Seymour GJ. 2013. Periodontal disease and systemic illness: will the evidence ever be enough? Periodontology 2000 62:271–286. doi: 10.1111/prd.12007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Teles R, Teles F, Frias-Lopez J, Paster B, Haffajee A. 2013. Lessons learned and unlearned in periodontal microbiology. Periodontology 2000 62:95–162. doi: 10.1111/prd.12010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Griffen AL, Beall CJ, Campbell JH, Firestone ND, Kumar PS, Yang ZK, Podar M, Leys EJ. 2012. Distinct and complex bacterial profiles in human periodontitis and health revealed by 16S pyrosequencing. ISME J 6:1176–1185. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.McLean JS. 2014. Advancements toward a systems level understanding of the human oral microbiome. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 4:98. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schwarzberg K, Le R, Bharti B, Lindsay S, Casaburi G, Salvatore F, Saber MH, Alonaizan F, Slots J, Gottlieb RA, Caporaso JG, Kelley ST. 2014. The personal human oral microbiome obscures the effects of treatment on periodontal disease. PLoS One 9:e86708. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nurk S, Bankevich A, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Korobeynikov A, Lapidus A, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin A, Sirotkin A, Sirotkin Y, Stepanauskas R, Clingenpeel SR, Woyke T, McLean JS, Lasken R, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2013. Assembling single-cell genomes and mini-metagenomes from chimeric MDA products. J Comput Biol 20:714–737. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2013.0084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.McLean JS, Lombardo M-, Badger JH, Edlund A, Novotny M, Yee-Greenbaum J, Vyahhi N, Hall AP, Yang Y, Dupont CL, Ziegler MG, Chitsaz H, Allen AE, Yooseph S, Tesler G, Pevzner PA, Friedman RM, Nealson KH, Venter JC, Lasken RS. 2013. Candidate phylum TM6 genome recovered from a hospital sink biofilm provides genomic insights into this uncultivated phylum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:E2390–E2399. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219809110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wu M, Scott AJ. 2012. Phylogenomic analysis of bacterial and archaeal sequences with AMPHORA2. Bioinformatics 28:1033–1034. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Varghese NJ, Mukherjee S, Ivanova N, Konstantinidis KT, Mavrommatis K, Kyrpides NC, Pati A. 2015. Microbial species delineation using whole genome sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 43:6761–6771. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES