Skip to main content
The Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology = Journal Canadien des Maladies Infectieuses et de la Microbiologie Médicale logoLink to The Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology = Journal Canadien des Maladies Infectieuses et de la Microbiologie Médicale
. 2015 Nov-Dec;26(6):299–304. doi: 10.1155/2015/393659

Characterization of invasive Neisseria meningitidis from Atlantic Canada, 2009 to 2013: With special reference to the nonpolysaccharide vaccine targets (PorA, factor H binding protein, Neisseria heparin-binding antigen and Neisseria adhesin A)

Raymond SW Tsang 1,, Dennis KS Law 1, Rita R Gad 2, Tim Mailman 3, Gregory German 4, Robert Needle 5
PMCID: PMC4692298  PMID: 26744586

Neisseria meningitidis can cause several invasive diseases. Serogroup distribution has been known to be related to geographical differences and, in Canada, most invasive meningococcal disease cases have been caused by serogroups B (MenB) and C. Following the introduction of a meningitis C vaccine, most cases are now caused by MenB. Characterization of invasive meningococcal disease case isolates from Atlantic Canada provides a snap shot of the molecular epidemiology, shedding light on the future of a MenB vaccine.

Keywords: Atlantic Canada, Invasive Neisseria meningitidis, MenB vaccine

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Serogroup B Neisseria meningitidis (MenB) has always been a major cause of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in Canada. With the successful implementation of a meningitis C conjugate vaccine, the majority of IMD in Canada is now caused by MenB.

OBJECTIVE:

To investigate IMD case isolates in Atlantic Canada from 2009 to 2013. Data were analyzed to determine the potential coverage of the newly licensed MenB vaccine.

METHODS:

Serogroup, serotype and serosubtype antigens were determined from IMD case isolates. Clonal analysis was performed using multilocus sequence typing. The protein-based vaccine antigen genes were sequenced and the predicted peptides were investigated.

RESULTS:

The majority of the IMD isolates were MenB (82.5%, 33 of 40) and, in particular, sequence type (ST)-154 B:4:P1.4 was responsible for 47.5% (19 of 40) of all IMD case isolates in Atlantic Canada. Isolates of this clone expressed the PorA antigen P1.4 and possessed the nhba genes encoding for Neisseria heparin-binding antigen peptide 2, which together matched exactly with two of the four components of the new four-component meningococcal B vaccine. Nineteen MenB isolates had two antigenic matches, another five MenB and one meningitis Y isolate had one antigenic match. This provided 75.8% (25 of 33) potential coverage for MenB, or a 62.5% (25 of 40) overall potential coverage for IMD.

CONCLUSION:

From 2009 to 2013, IMD in Atlantic Canada was mainly caused by MenB and, in particular, the B:4:P1.4 ST-154 clone, which accounted for 47.5% of all IMD case isolates. The new four-component meningococcal B vaccine appeared to offer adequate coverage against MenB in Atlantic Canada.


Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is a serious, nationally notifiable disease caused by the Gram-negative diplococcal bacterium Neisseria meningitidis. Invasive diseases caused by N meningitidis include meningitis, septicemia, pneumonia, septic arthritis and, occasionally, endocarditis, myocarditis and pericarditis, with an average case fatality rate of 10% (1). Six (A, B, C, W, X and Y) of the 12 recognized serogroups are responsible for most of the invasive diseases, which occur globally (2,3). However, geographical differences in serogroup distribution is well known (4); and in Canada, most IMD in the past 20 years have been caused mainly by serogroups B (MenB) and C (MenC) and, to a lesser degree, by serogroups W (MenW) and Y (MenY) (510). Aside from the serogroup antigen, the N meningitidis major outer membrane proteins, PorB (serotype antigen) and PorA (serosubtype antigen) are also important surface markers for typing and characterization of strains. Traditionally, clonal analysis of N meningitidis strains were performed using multilocus enzyme electrophoresis, which grouped isolates into electrophoretic types. However, it is not a user-friendly method, and the results generated are not portable for comparison between different laboratories. Therefore, it has been replaced by the more objective method of multilocus sequence typing (MLST), with isolates grouped together into sequence types (STs). Related STs are grouped together into clonal complexes (CCs). Most IMDs, especially those found in teenagers, adolescents and young adults, as well as those occurring in clusters or in epidemic form, are caused by a few major CCs known as hypervirulent clones (11).

After the introduction of meningococcal A, C, W and Y conjugate vaccine programs in Canada (12), the incidence of MenC disease has decreased substantially, with only six culture-confirmed MenC cases identified in Canada in 2013 (13). MenB is now the only major serogroup of meningococci left to be controlled by the newer MenB vaccines, which have either been licensed recently in Canada (14), or are in advanced clinical trials and awaiting regulatory approval for licensure in Canada (15).

Unlike the capsule vaccine used for serogroups A, C, W and Y meningococci, a MenB capsule would be nonimmunogenic due to the presence of a self-antigen (16) and, therefore, not feasible. Noncapsule meningococcal vaccines developed in the past were based on the porA outer membrane protein (OMP) vesicles; however, such vaccines are strain specific, effective against strains displaying homologous PorA antigens to the OMP vesicle (OMV) vaccine. Nevertheless, they have been used successfully in the past to control epidemics of MenB IMD (1720). Genome sequencing of microbial pathogens have renewed interest in the development of universal MenB vaccines. One such newer MenB vaccine (Bexsero, Novartis, Canada) recently licensed in Canada, has been developed using reverse vaccinology based on whole genome sequence information of meningococci (21). This four-component meningococcal B (4CMenB) recombinant vaccine comprises: factor H binding protein (fHbp) subfamily B or variant 1, peptide 1; Neisseria heparin binding antigen (NHBA) peptide 2; Neisseria adhesion A (NadA)-3.8; and the OMV vaccine used in New Zealand to control the MenB epidemic caused by the strain B:4:P1.4 (20). Another investigational MenB vaccine is based on a bivalent recombinant fHbp or lipoprotein 2086 (22).

fHbp is classified into three variants (1, 2 and 3) or two subfamilies, with subfamily A equivalent to variants 2 and 3, and subfamily B equivalent to variant 1. Because of amino acid sequence similarities between proteins in each subfamily of fHbp, cross-protection between proteins within a subfamily is possible, but not between subfamilies (23). Similarly, cross-protection among multiple NHBA peptide types have been reported (24). With regard to NadA, cross-protection between peptides that belong to NadA-1 and NadA-2/3 have been reported (25).

In preparation for the introduction of the newer MenB vaccine in Canada, the National Microbiology Laboratory (NML; Winnipeg, Manitoba) in collaboration with provinces, has been expanding laboratory surveillance activities to include a more in-depth study of MenB strains (26,27), as well as characterization of the noncarbohydrate protein-based vaccine antigen genes in Canadian IMD isolates (28). The present study characterizes IMD case isolates submitted to the NML from Atlantic Canada over the period from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2013. Characterization includes analysis of serogroup, serotype and serosubtype antigens, porA genotypes and nucleotide sequences of genes that encode for the protein-based vaccine targets, fHbp, NHBA and NadA.

METHODS

Individual IMD case isolates received at the NML between 2009 and 2013, from the Atlantic provinces of New Brunswick (NB), Nova Scotia (NS), Prince Edward Island (PEI), and Newfoundland and Labrador (NFLD) were included in the present study. All IMD case isolates were obtained from normally sterile body sites (such as blood, cerebrospinal fluid, synovial fluid, pleural fluid or pericardial fluid), as per the national case definition (http://dsol-smed.phac-aspc.gc.ca/dsol-smed/ndis/list-eng.php). In addition, the present study did not capture the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-diagnosed culture-negative cases, including at least one such case identified in NB.

All isolates were tested for serogroup using bacterial agglutination and/or PCR methods using procedures previously described (26,27). Serotyping and serosubtyping were performed using a monoclonal antibody typing kit (Rijksinstitut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu, Bilthoven, Netherlands) and indirect whole cell ELISA method (29). Monoclonal antibodies to serotypes 2c, 17, 19 and serosubtype P1.19 were provided by Dr Wendell Zollinger, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, United States. Isolates were analyzed using multilocus sequence typing (MLST) according to Maiden et al (30) and ST/CC was assigned using tools available in the Neisseria MLST website (http://pubmlst.org/neisseria/). Variable regions of porA genes were determined using protocols described by Sacchi et al (31) and Clark et al (32), following the nomenclature given in the N meningitidis porA variable region database (http://pubmlst.org/neisseria/PorA/) and by de Filippis et al (33). The fHbp, nhba and nadA gene sequences were determined using PCR amplification and standard sequencing reactions, following the protocols described by Lucidarme et al (34); and their peptide types were determined using online tools available from the Neisseria.org website (http://pubmlst.org/neisseria/fHbp/ and http://pubmlst.org/neis-seria/NHBA/ and http://pubmlst.org/neisseria/NadA/).

Patient age and sex, as well as specimen sources of the IMD isolates were obtained from specimen requisition forms. Population estimates were obtained from Statistic Canada’s website (www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/demo02a-eng.htm).

RESULTS

Temporal and geographical distribution of serogroups

Table 1 describes the serogroup distribution of invasive N meningitidis collected in Atlantic Canada from 2009 to 2013. Of the 40 invasive isolates collected, 33 (82.5%) belonged to MenB and 19 were submitted from NB.

TABLE 1.

Distribution of serogroups* of invasive Neisseria meningitidis in Atlantic Canada from 2009 to 2013

Year Province Atlantic Canada

New Brunswick Nova Scotia Prince Edward Island Newfoundland and Labrador
2009 6 (4B, 1Y, 1W) 2 (1B, 1C) 1 (B) 4 (4B) 13 (10B, 1C, 1Y, 1W)
2010 6 (4B, 1Y, 1E) 2 (1B, 1Y) 0 2 (2B) 10 (7B, 2Y, 1E)
2011 3 (3B) 3 (2B, 1Y) 0 1 (1B) 7 (6B, 1Y)
2012 6 (6B) 1 (1B) 1 (1B) 0 8 (8B)
2013 2 (2B) 0 0 0 2 (2B)
2009 to 2013 23 (19B, 2Y, 1W, 1E) 8 (5B, 1C, 2Y) 2 (2B) 7 (7B) 40 (33B, 1C, 4Y, 1W, 1E)

Data presented as n (serogroup[s]).

*

At least 12 different serogroups are recognized by specific antisera: A, B, C, E, H, I, K, L, W, X, Y and Z

Population biology of invasive N meningitidis in Atlantic Canada

Clonal analysis of the 33 MenB isolates revealed that 73% belonged to ST-41/44 CC, 9% to ST-269 CC and 6% to ST-32 CC, and the remaining 12% comprised one isolate each of ST-35 CC and ST-461 CC; two strains were not assigned to any known CC by the Neisseria.org MLST website (http://pubmlst.org/neisseria/).

Of the 24 isolates that belonged to ST-41/44 CC, 19 were ST-154 and the other five STs (ST-207, ST-340, ST-409, ST-7612, ST-9411) were each made up of only one isolate. The three MenB isolates that belonged to ST-269 CC were from NB (two isolates both typed as ST-8924) and NFLD (ST-1161). The two MenB isolates that belonged to ST-32 CC were from NFLD and were typed as ST-290 and ST-7814. The remaining four MenB isolates included one each of ST-8770 (ST-35 CC) from NB, ST-461 (ST-461 CC) from PEI, and two isolates of ST-5571 from NS (identified to belong to a new CC of MenB common in central and eastern Canada) (35).

The single MenC strain from NS belonged to ST-11 (ST-11/ ET-37 CC). Two of the four MenY isolates were from NB, and typed as ST-1466 (ST-174 CC) or ST-3923 (ST-167 CC). The other two MenY strains were from NS, and typed as ST-184 (ST-22 CC) or ST-8522 (not assigned to any known CC). The single MenW isolate from NB was typed as ST-1221 (ST-22 CC), and the MenE isolate also from NB was typed as ST-9856 (not assigned to any known CC).

ST-154 MenB

There were 19 individual MenB case isolates typed as ST-154 (ST-41/44 CC), which included 47.5% of all the invasive N meningitidis found in Atlantic Canada during the study period. Fifteen of the case isolates were from NB, two from NS and two from NFLD. These 19 ST-154 MenB cases involved 12 male and seven female patients, with ages ranging from one month to 92 years (median 11 years of age). Ten of the isolates were recovered from blood cultures and the remaining nine were recovered from cerebrospinal fluid. Eighteen isolates were typed as B:4:P1.4 (serogroup B, serotype 4 and serosubtype P1.4), and one isolate was typed B:NT:P1.4 (nontypeable [NT]). The porA genotype for 17 isolates was P1.7-2,4,37 and two were typed as P1.7-2,4,36.

Characterization of noncarbohydrate protein-based meningococcal vaccine targets in MenB in Atlantic Canada

The antigenic formula (serotype and serosubtype antigens) expressed and the porA genotypes of the 40 invasive N meningitidis isolates are summarized in Table 2. Thirty-five isolates expressed seven different serotype antigens, and serotype 4 was the most commonly detected antigen in 24 isolates; five isolates did not express any detectable serotype antigens. Thirty-three isolates expressed eight different serosubtype antigens, including P1.4 detected in 21 isolates. Seven isolates did not express any detectable serosubtype antigens. There were 16 different porA genotypes found among the 40 isolates, and P1.7-2,4,37 was found in 19 of these (Table 2).

TABLE 2.

Antigenic formula and porA genotypes of invasive Neisseria meningitidis in Atlantic Canada from 2009 to 2013

Antigenic formula PorA genotype Isolates, n
B:4:P1.4 P1.7-2,4,37 17
B:4:P1.4 P1.7-2,4,36 2
B:NT:P1.4 P1.7-2,4,37 1
B:4:P1.14 P1.22,14,36 2
B:4:P1.14 P1.22-1,14,38 1
B:4:P1.- P1.12-6,13-4,35-1 1
B:4:P1.- P1.22,14-6,36-2 1
B:15:P1.4 P1.7-2,4,37 1
B:15:P1.7,16 P1.7,16,35 1
B:17:P1.9 P1.22,9,35-1 1
B:17:P1.19 P1.19-1,15-11,36 2
B:1,19:P1.6 P1.18,25,38-1 1
B:1,19:P1.19 P1.19,13-1,36 1
B:1,19:P1.- P1.18-1,34,38 1
C:2a:P1.- P1.5,2,36-2 1
Y:2c:P1.5 P1.5-1,10-4,36-2 1
Y:15,19:P1.16 P1.21,16,37-1 1
Y:NT:P1.5 P1.5-1,10-4,36-2 1
Y:NT :P1.- P1.18-1,3,38 1
W:NT:P1.- P1.18-1,3,38 1
E:NT:P1.- P1.22,14-6,36-2 1

Aside from possessing the identical porA genotype of P1.7-2,4, all 19 ST-154 MenB isolates were found to have a fHbp gene allele predicted to encode for peptide 4 (variant 1 or subfamily B). Eighteen of the 19 isolates were found to have nhba genes predicted to encode for NHBA peptide 2 and the remaining isolate was predicted to encode NHBA peptide 7. None of the isolates possessed the nadA gene.

The remaining MenB isolates were more diverse in terms of their porA, fHbp and nhba gene sequences. From the 14 non-ST-154 MenB isolates, 11 different fHbp gene alleles were identified that encoded for peptides 1, 4, 13, 14, 16, 19, 47, 106, 110, 414 and 626. Eight NHBA peptide types (2, 3, 6, 17, 21, 29, 43 and 197) were also predicted to be encoded by the non-ST-154 MenB isolates based on their nhba gene sequences. Only two MenB isolates that belonged to the ST-32 CC were found to have the nadA genes: in one isolate, the nadA gene allele 1 was found, which encoded for NadA peptide 1; and the other isolate was found to have the nadA gene allele 85, not predicted to produce a NadA protein, due to a frame-shift mutation.

Overall, 21 of 33 MenB isolates were found to express the PorA antigen P1.4 and display the porA genotype of P1.7-2,4, which represented 87.5% of the MenB isolates that belonged to the ST-41/44 CC (n=24). Eleven fHbp peptide types were predicted from the 33 MenB isolates, with seven of them (peptides 1, 4, 13, 14, 110, 414 and 626) belonging to variant 1 or subfamily B; three peptide types (peptides 16, 19 and 106) belonged to variant 2 (subfamily A); and one peptide type (peptide 47) belonged to the variant 3 (also subfamily A). Twenty-seven (81.8%) of the 33 MenB isolates were predicted to encode variant 1 fHbp peptides; five isolates (15.2%) were predicted to encode variant 2 peptides; and one isolate (3.0%) predicted to encode variant 3 peptide.

Noncarbohydrate protein-based meningococcal vaccine targets in MenC, -Y, -W and -E isolates in Atlantic Canada

Five fHbp peptide types (peptides 16, 21, 22, 23 and 24) were found among the seven non-B meningococcal isolates; and only peptide 16 was found among the Atlantic Canada MenB isolates. In addition, five NHBA peptide types were found: peptides 6, 9, 20, 29 and 336; peptides 6 and 29 were also found among the MenB isolates in Atlantic Canada. Only two isolates were found to possess the nadA gene: in the MenC isolate, the nadA gene allele 3 encodes a nadA-2/3 peptide 3, while a MenY isolate was found to have nadA allele 80, which encoded for a NadA-2/3 peptide 8.

Predicted 4CMenB (Bexsero) vaccine antigens present in invasive Neisseria meningitidis strains from Atlantic Canada

The variety of fHbp, NHBA and NadA peptide types found among invasive N meningitidis strains in Atlantic Canada is summarized in Table 3. No isolate was found to have all four antigens (PorA, fHbp, NHBA and NadA) displaying an exact match to the 4CMenB vaccine components. In addition, no isolate was found with three matching antigens to the 4CMenB vaccine. However, 19 isolates (all MenB) were found to have two antigens (PorA P1.4 and NHBA peptide 2) that displayed an exact match to the 4CMenB vaccine. An additional six isolates were found to have at least one antigen that matched with the 4CMenB vaccine (two MenB for PorA P1.4; two other MenB isolates with NHBA peptide 2; another MenB with fHbp peptide 1; and 1 MenY with a NadA peptide 8). Collectively, 25 isolates were found to have one or more antigens that matched the 4CMenB and, therefore, at least 62.5% of all invasive N meningitidis from Atlantic Canada in the period from 2009 to 2013, were predicted to be covered by the vaccine. However, the number of non-MenB strains studied was very small and, therefore, the prediction for these other serogroups would not be meaningful. The predicted coverage for MenB alone in Atlantic Canada was significantly higher (24 of 33 isolates [73%]) due to the predominant presence of the ST-154 clone, which shared two exact match antigens (PorA P1.4 and NHBA peptide 2) with the vaccine.

TABLE 3.

Predicted four-component meningococcal B vaccine antigens present in invasive Neisseria meningitidis strains in Atlantic Canada from 2009 to 2013

Vaccine antigen type Isolates, n (serogroup[s])
PorA antigen P1.4 21 (B)
Factor H-binding protein peptide
  1 1 (B)
  4 20 (B)
  13 2 (B)
  14 1 (B)
  16 3 (B; E; Y)
  19 3 (B)
  21 1 (Y)
  22 2 (C, W)
  23 1 (Y)
  24 1 (Y)
  47 1 (B)
  106 1 (B)
  110 1 (B)
  414 1 (B)
  626 1 (B)
Neisseria heparin-binding antigen peptide
  2 21 (B)
  3 2 (B)
  6 3 (2B, 1Y)
  7 1 (B)
  9 2 (Y)
  17 1 (B)
  20 2 (W, Y)
  21 3 (B)
  29 2 (B, C)
  43 1 (B)
  197 1 (B)
  336 1 (E)
Nesseria adhesion A peptide
  1 1 (B)
  3 1 (C)
  8 1 (Y)

DISCUSSION

The present study provides a snap shot of the molecular epidemiology of IMD in Atlantic Canada from 2009 to 2013. A striking feature was the predominance of MenB (82.5%), as a cause of IMD in this region of Canada. For the same period in western Canada, the overall abundance of MenB among all invasive N meningitidis case isolates was 42.9%, including 48.5% in British Columbia, 36.5% in Alberta, 39.1% in Saskatchewan and 45.0% in Manitoba (28). In Ontario, between 2001 and 2010, 39.1% of all invasive meningococcal case isolates were MenB (27). In Quebec, the percentage of MenB for the period of 2003 to 2010 was higher (71.1%) due to an increase in the B:17:P1.19 ST-269 clone, which emerged in 2003 (36) and persisted until at least 2010 (26).

Here, and in our previous studies, we have shown that the epidemiology of IMD in different parts of Canada may reveal both geographical and temporal differences. Clonal analysis of MenB in western Canada and Ontario reflected an endemic disease picture where no single clone or ST predominated (27,28). This was in contrast to the data from Quebec, where almost one-half (49%) of all MenB was typed as a single clone, ST-269, which accounted for 35% of all culture-confirmed IMD case isolates from 2003 to 2010 (26). In Atlantic Canada, most (57.6%) of the MenB isolates belonged to a strain characterized as ST-154 with the antigenic formula of B:4:P1.4. This strain was responsible for 47.5% of all culture-confirmed IMD cases in the region; however, the majority (15 of 19 [79%]) of the case isolates were identified in NB, including three to four culture-confirmed cases per year between 2009 and 2012. In 2013, only one culture-confirmed case was due to this strain. In contrast, for the same period, only five ST-154 MenB isolates were found among the culture-confirmed IMD cases in western Canada (28). The combined population in western Canada in 2012 was estimated to be 10.77 million, while in Atlantic Canada the combined population in 2012 was estimated to be 2.37 million. This MenB strain was also rare in Quebec (population estimated to be 7.9 million in 2010), with only two isolates found among 334 invasive MenB strains between 2003 and 2010 (26). In Ontario (population estimated to be 13.1 million in 2010), 10 such MenB strains were detected among 193 invasive MenB isolates between 2001 and 2010 (27). Sequence type 154 belongs to the ST-41/44 CC or lineage 3, a well-known hypervirulent clone. A strain characterized as B:4:P1.4 ST-154 or ST-42 was the cause of the MenB epidemic in New Zealand in the 1990s (37,38), which prompted the New Zealand government to commission production of a strain-specific OMV vaccine based on the PorA P1.4 OMP (20).

The percentage of MenB involving fHbp genes that encoded for variant 1 or subfamily B peptides was significantly higher in Atlantic Canada (82%) (the present study) than in western Canada (38%) (28), or in the Immunization Monitoring Program Active (IMPACT) study examining MenB isolates from 12 pediatric tertiary care centres across the country (64%) (39). The strain differences in these three studies were probably the reason for the observed difference in fHbp types reported. In western Canada, ST-213 CC was the second most common CC found, and most (92%) of the isolates from this CC were predicted to have fHbp peptide 45 (variant 3). In addition, the strains involved in MenB disease in western Canada were very diverse in terms of their antigens and ST, which presented a picture of endemic disease (28). In contrast, the IMPACT study was in some way skewed by the elevated incidence of MenB disease in Quebec over the past several years due to the ST-269 clone (26,40). Most ST-269 MenB were found to have the fHbp gene allele 15, predicted to synthesize variant 1 or subfamily B fHbp protein. In Atlantic Canada, the predominance of the ST-154 MenB strain, which uniformly have the fHbp gene allele 4, was predicted to synthesize variant 1 or subfamily B peptide. This contributed to the highest percentage of MenB found in Canada, predicted to be covered by the fHbp component present in the 4CMenB or the bivalent recombinant fHbp vaccine. A similar study from the United States revealed that 59% of MenB isolates were found to encode variant 1 or subfamily B fHbp peptides (41), while in Europe the percentage of MenB encoding for variant 1 or subfamily B fHbp differed according to country, and ranged from 65.2% to 76.7% (42).

Similar to the observation in western Canada, the fHbp genes in all seven non-MenB strains in Atlantic Canada encoded variant 2 or subfamily A fHbp proteins. None of the strains had the nhba gene, which predicts the synthesis of NHBA peptide 2. Only two non-MenB strains were found to have nadA genes that enable synthesis of NadA peptides, likely covered by the NadA component of the 4CMenB vaccine.

Overall, 25 (62.5%) of the 40 invasive strains found in Atlantic Canada had at least one antigen that matched exactly to the 4CMenB vaccine components. Additional coverage may be possible by the NHBA component of 4CMenB as cross-protection against different NHBA peptides that have been reported (24). Furthermore, components other than the porA P1.4 that are present in the OMV may also provide further protective immunity.

One limitation of the present study was the relatively small number of non-MenB strains examined and, therefore, the prediction for these other serogroups would not be meaningful. The predicted coverage for MenB alone in Atlantic Canada was significantly higher (24 of 33 [73%] isolates) due to the predominant presence of the ST-154 clone, which shared two exact match antigens (PorA P1.4 and NHBA peptide 2) with the vaccine. Second, we did not perform the meningococcal antigen typing system assay (43) to study the degree of expression and cross-reactivity of antigens on clinical isolates with those in the 4CMenB vaccine. Regardless, true coverage may not be known unless the vaccine is used in a population because strains within a region may change over time. Furthermore, true vaccine coverage rates may change because the epidemiology of clones may shift over time and among regions (4446).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the staff of the National Microbiology Laboratory’s DNA Core Facility for providing primers and assistance with DNA sequencing. They also thank Jianwei Zhou and Saul Deng for technical assistance, as well as the staff at the local and regional hospitals in the provinces of NB, NS, PEI and NFLD for providing the isolates for the study. This study made use of the Neisseria MLST website (http://pubmlst.org/neisseria/) developed by Keith Jolley and Man-Suen Chan, and located at the University of Oxford, United Kingdom. The development of the site has been funded by the Wellcome Trust and European Union.

Footnotes

DISCLOSURE: The authors have no financial relationships or conflicts of interest to declare.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Rosenstein NE, Perkins BA, Stephens DS, Popovic T, Huges JM. Meningococcal disease. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1378–88. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200105033441807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Al-Tawfiq JA, Clark TA, Memish ZA. Meningococcal disease: The organism, clinical presentation, and worldwide epidemiology. J Trop Med. 2010;17(Suppl):3–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8305.2010.00448.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Xie Q, Pollard AJ, Mueller JE, Norheim G. Emergence of serogroup X meningococcal disease in Africa: Need for a vaccine. Vaccine. 2013;31:2852–61. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.04.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Harrison LH, Trotter CL, Ramsay ME. Global epidemiology of meningococcal disease. Vaccine. 2009;27S:B51–63. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.04.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Deeks SL, Kertesz D, Ryan A, Johnson W, Ashton F. Surveillance of invasive meningococcal disease in Canada, 1995–1996. Can Commun Dis Rep. 1997;23:121–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Squires SG, Pelletier L, Mungai M, Tsang R, Collins F, Stoltz J. Invasive meningococcal disease in Canada, 1 January 1997 to 31 December 1998. Can Commun Dis Rep. 2000;26:177–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Squires SG, Deeks S, Tsang RSW. Enhanced surveillance of invasive meningococcal disease in Canada: 1 January 1998 through 31 December 2001. Can Commu Dis Rep. 2004;30:17–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Watkins KM, Deeks SL, Medgaglia A, Tsang RSW. Enhanced surveillance of invasive meningococcal disease in Canada: 1 January 2002, through 31 December 2003. Can Commun Dis Rep. 2006;32:97–107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Navarro C, Deeks SL, Medagha A, Tsang RSW. Enhanced surveillance of invasive meningococcal disease in Canada: 1 January 2004, through 31 December, 2005. Can Commun Dis Rep. 2007;33:1–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Li YA, Tsang R, Desai S, Deehan H. Enhanced surveillance of invasive meningococcal disease in Canada, 2006–2011. Can Communicable Dis Rep. 2014;40:160–9. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v40i09a01. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Caugant DA. Population genetics and molecular epidemiology of Neisseria meningitidis. APMIS. 1998;106:505–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) An Advisory Committee Statement (ACS) update on the use of quadrivalent conjugate meningococcal vaccines. Can Commun Dis Rep. 2013;39:1–40. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v39i00a01. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tsang RSW, Hoang L, Tyrrell G, et al. Genetic and antigenic characterization of Canadian Neisseria meningitidis serogroup C (MenC) case isolates in the post-MenC conjugate vaccine era, 2009–2013. J Med Microbiol. 2015;64:174–9. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000006-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Santolaya ME, O’Ryan ML, Valenzuela MT, et al. Immunogenicity and tolerability of a multicomponent meningococcal serogroup B (4CMenB) vaccine in healthy adolescents in Chile: A phase 2b/3 randomised, observer-blind, placebo-controlled study. Lancet. 2012;379:617–24. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61713-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Richmond PC, Marshall HS, Nissan MD, et al. Safety, immunogenicity, and tolerability of meningococcal serogroup B bivalent recombinant lipoprotein 2086 vaccine in healthy adolescents: A randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12:597–607. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70087-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Finne J, Leinonen M, Makela PH. Antigenic similarities between brain components and bacteria causing meningitis. Implications for vaccine development and pathogenesis. Lancet. 1983;322:355–7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)90340-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bjune G, Hoiby EA, Gronnesby JK, et al. Effect of outer membrane vesicle vaccine against group B meningococcal disease in Norway. Lancet. 1991;338:1093–6. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91961-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sierra GVG, Campa HC, Varcacel NM, et al. Vaccine against group B Neisseria meningitidis: Protection trial and mass vaccination results in Cuba. NIPH Ann. 1991;14:195–207. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.de Moraes JC, Perkins BA, Camargo MC, et al. Protective efficacy of a serogroup B meningococcal vaccine in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Lancet. 1992;340:1074–8. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)93086-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Oster P, Lennon D, O’Hallahan, Mulholland K, Reid S, Martin D. MeNZB: A safe and highly immunogenic tailor-made vaccine against the New Zealand Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B disease epidemic strain. Vaccine. 2005;23:2191–6. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.01.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sette A, Rappuoli R. Reverse vaccinology: Developing vaccines in the era of genomics. Immunity. 2010;33:530–41. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.09.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pillai S, Howell A, Alexander K, et al. Outer membrane protein (OMP) based vaccine for Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B. Vaccine. 2005;23:2206–9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.01.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Masignani V, Comanducci M, Giuliani MM, et al. Vaccination against Neisseria meningitidis using three variants of the lipoprotein GNA1870. J Exp Med. 2003;197:789–99. doi: 10.1084/jem.20021911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Giuliani MM, Adu-Boble J, Comanducci M, et al. A universal vaccine for serogroup B meningococcus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:10834–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603940103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Comanducci M, Bambini S, Brunelli B, et al. NadA, a novel vaccine candidate of Neisseria meningitidis. J Exp Med. 2002;195:1445–54. doi: 10.1084/jem.20020407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhou J, Lefebvre B, Deng S, et al. Invasive serogroup B Neisseria meningitidis in Quebec, Canada, 2003 to 2010: Persistence of the ST-269 clone since it first emerged in 2003. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:1545–51. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06835-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jamieson FB, Rawte P, Deeks, et al. Genetic and antigenic characterization of invasive endemic serogroup B Neisseria meningitidis from Ontario, Canada, in 2001–2010. J Med Microbiol. 2013;62:46–55. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.050369-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Law DKS, Zhou J, Deng S, et al. Determination of serotyping antigens, clonal analysis and genetic characterization of the 4CMenB vaccine antigen genes in invasive Neisseria meningitidis from Western Canada, 2009–2013. J Med Microbiol. 2014;63:1490–9. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.079921-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Abdillahi H, Poolman JT. Whole-cell ELISA for typing Neisseria meningitidis with monoclonal antibodies. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1987;48:367–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Maiden MCJ, Bygraves JA, Feil E, et al. Multilocus sequence typing: A portable approach to the identification of clones within populations of pathogenic microorganisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:3140–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.6.3140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sacchi CT, Lemos AP, Brandt ME, et al. Proposed standardization of Neisseria meningitidis PorA variable-region typing nomemclature. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1998;5:845–55. doi: 10.1128/cdli.5.6.845-855.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Clark SC, Diggle MA, Molling P, Unemo M, Olcen P. Analysis of PorA variable region 3 in menincococci: Implications for vaccine policy. Vaccine. 2003;21:2468–73. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(03)00033-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.de Filippis I, Gopalan V, Huyen Y. PorA VR3 typing database: A web-based resource for the determination of PorA VR3 alleles of Neisseria meningitidis. Infect Gene Evol. 2011;11:248–9. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2010.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lucidarme J, Comanducci M, Findlow J, et al. Characterization of fHbp, nhba (gna2132), nadA, porA, and sequence type in group B meningococcal case isolates collected in England and Wales during January 2008 and potential coverage of an investigational group B meningococcal vaccine. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2010;17:919–29. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00027-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tsang RSW, Lefebvre B, Jamieson FB, Gilca R, Deeks SL, Zhou J. Identification and proposal of a potentially new clonal complex that is a common cause of MenB disease in central and eastern Canada. Can J Microbiol. 2012;58:1236–40. doi: 10.1139/w2012-103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Law DKS, Lorange M, Ringuette L, et al. Invasive meningococcal disease in Québec, Canada, due to an emerging clone of ST-269 serogroup B meningococci with serotype antigen 17 and serosubtype antigen P1.19 (B:17:P1.19) J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:2743–9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00601-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Martin DR, Walker SJ, Baker MG, Lennon DR. New Zealand epidemic of meningococcal disease identified by a strain with phenotype B:4:P1.4. J Infect Dis. 1998;177:497–500. doi: 10.1086/517385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Dyet KH, Martin DR. Clonal analysis of the serogroup B meningococci causing New Zealand’s epidemic. Epidemiol Infect. 2006;134:377–83. doi: 10.1017/S0950268805004954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bettinger JA, Scheifele DW, Halperin SA, et al. Diversity of Canadian meningococcal serogroup B isolates and estimated coverage by an investigational meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB) Vaccine. 2014;32:124–30. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.03.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gilca R, Deceuninck G, Lefebvre B, et al. The changing epidemiology of meningococcal disease in Québec, Canada, 1991–2011: Potential implications of emergence of new strains. PloS One. 2012;7:1–9. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wang X, Cohn A, Comanducci M, et al. Prevalence and genetic diversity of candidate vaccine antigens among invasive Neisseria meningitidis isolates in the United States. Vaccine. 2011;29:4739–44. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.04.092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Murphy E, Andrew L, Lee KL, et al. Sequence diversity of the factor H binding protein vaccine candidate in epidemiologically relevant strains of serogtoup B Neisseria meningitidis. J Infect Dis. 2009;200:379–89. doi: 10.1086/600141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Plikaytis BD, Stella M, Boccadifuoco G, et al. Interlaboratory standardization of the sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay designed for MATS, a rapid, reproducible method for estimating the strain coverage of investigational vaccines. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012;19:1609–17. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00202-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Perez-Trallero E, Esnal O, Marimon JM. Progressive decrease in the potential usefulness of meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB, Bexsero®) in Gipuzkoa, Northern Spain. PLoS One. 2014;9:e116024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Tzanakaki G, Hong E, Kesanopoulos K, et al. Diversity of Greek meningococcal serogroup B isolates and estimated coverage of the 4CMenB meningococcal vaccine. BMC Microbiol. 2014;14:111. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-14-111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Vogel U, Taha MK, Vazquez JA, et al. Predicated strain coverage of a meningococcal multicomponent vaccine (4CMenB) in Europe: A qualitative and quantitative assessment. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13:416–25. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70006-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES