Skip to main content
EMBO Molecular Medicine logoLink to EMBO Molecular Medicine
. 2015 Oct 29;7(12):1529–1546. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201505439

Aberrant epigenome in iPSC‐derived dopaminergic neurons from Parkinson's disease patients

Rubén Fernández‐Santiago 1,2,3,, Iria Carballo‐Carbajal 2,4,, Giancarlo Castellano 5,, Roger Torrent 6, Yvonne Richaud 7,8, Adriana Sánchez‐Danés 6, Roser Vilarrasa‐Blasi 5, Alex Sánchez‐Pla 9,10, José Luis Mosquera 9, Jordi Soriano 11, José López‐Barneo 2,12, Josep M Canals 2,3,13, Jordi Alberch 2,3,13, Ángel Raya 7,8,14, Miquel Vila 2,4,14, Antonella Consiglio 6,15,, José I Martín‐Subero 5,, Mario Ezquerra 1,2,3,‡,, Eduardo Tolosa 1,2,3,16,
PMCID: PMC4693505  PMID: 26516212

Abstract

The epigenomic landscape of Parkinson's disease (PD) remains unknown. We performed a genomewide DNA methylation and a transcriptome studies in induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)‐derived dopaminergic neurons (DAn) generated by cell reprogramming of somatic skin cells from patients with monogenic LRRK2‐associated PD (L2PD) or sporadic PD (sPD), and healthy subjects. We observed extensive DNA methylation changes in PD DAn, and of RNA expression, which were common in L2PD and sPD. No significant methylation differences were present in parental skin cells, undifferentiated iPSCs nor iPSC‐derived neural cultures not‐enriched‐in‐DAn. These findings suggest the presence of molecular defects in PD somatic cells which manifest only upon differentiation into the DAn cells targeted in PD. The methylation profile from PD DAn, but not from controls, resembled that of neural cultures not‐enriched‐in‐DAn indicating a failure to fully acquire the epigenetic identity own to healthy DAn in PD. The PD‐associated hypermethylation was prominent in gene regulatory regions such as enhancers and was related to the RNA and/or protein downregulation of a network of transcription factors relevant to PD (FOXA1, NR3C1, HNF4A, and FOSL2). Using a patient‐specific iPSC‐based DAn model, our study provides the first evidence that epigenetic deregulation is associated with monogenic and sporadic PD.

Keywords: DNA methylation, dopaminergic neuron, induced pluripotent stem cell, Parkinson's disease, transcription factor

Subject Categories: Chromatin, Epigenetics, Genomics & Functional Genomics; Neuroscience; Stem Cells

Introduction

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder associated with the progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons (DAn) in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) (Lang & Lozano, 1998a,b). Yet PD is recognized as a systemic disease affecting other tissues apart from the nervous system (Hoepken et al, 2008; Beach et al, 2010; Shannon et al, 2012). Although most cases are sporadic, around 5–10% encompass monogenic forms caused by pathogenic mutations in PD‐associated genes (Farrer, 2006). Among these, missense mutations in the leucine‐rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) gene are the most frequent cause of familial PD (Paisan‐Ruiz et al, 2004; Zimprich et al, 2004) and also of the common sporadic form. The LRRK2 G2019S mutation alone explains up to 6% familial and 3% sporadic PD cases in Europeans (Di Fonzo et al, 2005; Gilks et al, 2005) and up to 20% of total cases among Ashkenazy Jews (Ozelius et al, 2006) or 40% in North African Berbers (Lesage et al, 2006). In addition, LRRK2‐associated PD (L2PD) is clinical and neuropathologically similar to sporadic PD (sPD) lacking LRRK2 mutations (Healy et al, 2008), thus representing a valuable system to investigate the most common form of disease. Moreover, the reduced penetrance of G2019S in L2PD suggests the involvement, akin to sPD, of yet unknown disease‐modifying factors (Healy et al, 2008).

Genetic and epigenetic alterations contribute to the physiopathology of diseases (Bergman & Cedar, 2013). In PD, beyond largely studied genetic defects, the epigenomic landscape of disease remains unknown (Urdinguio et al, 2009; van Heesbeen et al, 2013). Epigenetic modifications are inheritable changes of gene expression without alterations in the DNA sequence which can virtually capture the influence of environmental factors (Feil & Fraga, 2011). Thus, epigenetic alterations can reflect the relationship among factors which have been postulated to play a role in complex neurodegenerative disorders such as the individual genetic background, the environment, and the aging process. To date, epigenetic studies in central nervous system disorders have been hampered by the inaccessibility to disease targeted cells from patients, and especially of DAn from the SNpc in PD. The few published reports in PD were performed in blood cells using single gene candidate approaches (Kontopoulos et al, 2006; Pieper et al, 2008; de Boni et al, 2011; Jin et al, 2014) or human postmortem cortex and cerebellum representing end‐points of disease (Desplats et al, 2011; IPDGC, 2011; Masliah et al, 2013). Results from these studies have been sometimes conflicting and did not yield robust associations. In addition, previous studies on iPSC‐derived DAn did not explore in the role of the epigenome in PD (Byers et al, 2011; Nguyen et al, 2011; Seibler et al, 2011; Cooper et al, 2012; Jiang et al, 2012; Sanchez‐Danes et al, 2012b; Rakovic et al, 2013; Reinhardt et al, 2013; Ryan et al, 2013; Schondorf et al, 2014).

In the present study, we investigated the epigenome of PD by performing a genomewide DNA methylation study of CpG dinucleotides and a transcriptome study using an in vitro PD model of patient‐specific disease‐relevant cells (DAn). This cell system consisted in induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)‐derived DAn generated upon cell reprogramming of parental skin cells from L2PD patients carrying the G2019S mutation (n = 4), sPD patients without LRRK2 mutations (n = 6), and gender‐ and age‐matched healthy subjects (n = 4) (Sanchez‐Danes et al, 2012a,b). Studied cell lines were similar in PD and controls as regards their properties and their maturation state and included 30‐day morphologically and functionally mature ventromedial (vm)‐DAn which were mostly of the A9 subtype (Sanchez‐Danes et al, 2012b). The goal of our study was to explore for the first time the epigenomic landscape of PD using iPSC‐derived DAn, and to compare the methylome of the common sPD form with the uniquely resembling L2PD monogenic form.

Results

Studied cell lines from PD patients and healthy controls were generated and characterized in parallel blind to researcher in a previous study (Sanchez‐Danes et al, 2012b) using a 30‐days differentiation protocol (Sanchez‐Danes et al, 2012a) (Table 1, Fig 1 and Materials and Methods). Resulting iPSC‐derived DAn had similar morphological and functional properties as well as similar full DAn maturation state in PD and controls (Fig 1) (Sanchez‐Danes et al, 2012b). Yet consistently with the late onset of disease, the DAn cells from PD patients developed specific neurodegenerative phenotypes upon long‐term culture (75‐days) including impaired axonal outgrowth, deficient autophagic vacuole clearance, and accumulation of α‐synuclein (SNCA) (Sanchez‐Danes et al, 2012b; Orenstein et al, 2013).

Table 1.

Summary of clinical features and iPSC‐derived DAn cell line details from PD patients and gender‐ and age‐matched healthy controls

Cell line code Code previous studyRef. Subject type LRRK2 mutation Family history of PD Gender Age at donation Age at onset Initial symptomsa L‐DOPA response Code of selected IPSCs clones Cell ratio TUJ1+/DAPI+ (neurons)b Cell ratio TH+/TUJ1+ (DA neurons)c
C‐01 SP‐15 Control No No Female 47 15‐2 34.7 45.0
C‐02 SP‐11 Control No No Female 48 11‐1 40.0 59.9
C‐03 SP‐09 Control No No Male 66 9‐4 52.2 55.5
C‐04 SP‐17 Control No No Male 52 17‐2 54.0 65.8
PD‐01 SP‐13 L2PD G2019S Yes Female 68 57 T Good 13‐4 47.0 65.2
PD‐02 SP‐02 sPD No No Male 55 48 T N/A 2‐1 20.6 42.2
PD‐03 SP‐05 L2PD G2019S Yes Male 66 52 B Good 5‐1 39.9 49.6
PD‐04 SP‐16 sPD No No Female 51 48 B N/A 16‐2 32.1 55.2
PD‐05 SP‐06 L2PD G2019S Yes Male 44 33 T Good 6‐2 40.9 61.9
PD‐06 SP‐10 sPD No No Male 58 50 D Good 10‐2 35.0 41.1
PD‐07 SP‐12 L2PD G2019S Yes Female 63 49 T Good 12‐3 42.7 60.0
PD‐08 SP‐04 sPD No No Male 46 40 B Good 4‐2 52.1 47.3
PD‐09 SP‐01 sPD No No Female 63 58 T and B N/A 1‐1 32.2 44.9
PD‐10 SP‐08 sPD No No Female 66 60 T Good 8‐1 41.6 67.1

N/A, not assessed; C, control.

aInitial symptoms; T, tremor; B, bradykinesia; D, foot dystonia.

bRatio of neurons/total cells, estimated by immunofluorescence as the ratio of TUJ1 (neuron‐specific class III b‐tubulin)‐positive cells/DAPI‐positive cells.

cRatio of iPSC‐derived DAn/total neurons, estimated by immunofluorescence as the ratio of TH (tyrosine hydroxylase)‐positive cells/TUJ1‐positive cells.

b and c were calculated blind to researcher upon three independent differentiations as previously described (Sanchez‐Danes et al, 2012b).

Figure 1. Generation and characterization of iPSC‐derived DAn.

Figure 1

  • A–G
    After iPSC‐based reprogramming of fibroblasts, we generated DAn from PD patients (n = 10) and gender‐ and age‐matched healthy controls (n = 4) using a 30‐day differentiation protocol. Blind to researcher, resulting iPSC‐derived DAn showed similar properties and maturation state in PD and controls. Specifically, studied iPSC‐derived DAn encompassed 30‐day ventromedial (vm)‐DAn‐enriched cultures of morphologically mature DAn showing typical bipolar morphology, lacking PD neural phenotypes, mostly of the A9 subtype, and showing properties of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH)+ mature neurons. Representative immunocytochemical analyses of vmDAn from PD patients and controls showed that (A) TUJ1‐positive cells expressing neural tubulin III (TUJ1) co‐expressed TH (Scale bar, 25 μm); (B) co‐expressed the A9 subtype marker of inward rectifier K+ channel GIRK2 (Scale bar, 25 μm); (C) co‐expressed the A9 subtype marker of transcription factor Forkhead Box A2 (FOXA2) (Scale bar, 12.5 μm); and (F) co‐expressed the synaptic vesicle protein synaptophysin (SYP) which was located along neurites (Scale bar, 5 μm). (D) The 1‐week neural progenitor cells (NPCs) from which iPSC‐derived DAn were generated strongly expressed DAn progenitor markers such as the nuclear‐related receptor 1 NURR1 (Scale bar, 12.5 μm). (E) We observed similar and comparable cell counts of total neurons in PD and controls as quantified by TUJ‐1/DAPI and of DAn as quantified by TH/TUJ1. Selected DAn cells were generated upon 2‐6 iPSC lines per subject (See methods). Error bars indicate SEM. C, control; TUJ1, neuron‐specific class III b‐tubulin. (G) Calcium imaging assay revealed strong spontaneous neuronal activity. %ΔF/F indicates the relative change in fluorescence of the monitored neurons. Collectively, these results indicate that the iPSC‐derived DAn used our study were sufficiently mature for the studied parameters to be functional and to spontaneously form active neural networks in a similar and comparable manner for PD and controls.

Epigenetic changes are associated with monogenic and sporadic PD

We performed a comprehensive genomewide DNA methylation analysis of 30‐days iPSC‐derived DAn using the Illumina 450k methylation platform (Bibikova et al, 2011). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of CpGs methylation values showed different DNA methylation profiles between both forms of PD (L2PD and sPD) and controls indicating robust differences between PD and controls (Figs 2A and EV1A). We further detected 1,261 differentially methylated CpG sites (DMCpGs) in L2PD and 2,512 in sPD with respect to controls under an absolute mean methylation difference above 0.25 (Bibikova et al, 2011) and an adjusted P below 0.05 (Figs 2B and EV1B, and Table EV1). Most DMCpGs in L2PD were common to sPD (78%) and no significant methylation differences were found when comparing L2PD and sPD using the same criteria mentioned above, indicating that L2PD and sPD share similar methylation profiles. Accordingly, both groups were merged for further analysis. In all PD subjects, we identified 2,087 DMCpGs as compared to controls including hypermethylation in 1,046 regions and hypomethylation in 1,041. DMCpGs mostly affected gene bodies and promoters but were also enriched at intergenic regions. Hypermethylated DMCpGs were more often located outside CpG islands, shores, or shelves (73% vs. 31% in background, < 0.4 × 10−14) (Fig 2C). Notably, genes associated with DMCpGs were largely involved in neural functions and transcription factor (TF) activity (Table EV2). These data indicate that DAn from PD patients show epigenetic abnormalities. They also indicate that monogenic L2PD and the sporadic form of PD share similar DNA methylation changes.

Figure 2. DNA methylation analysis of iPSC‐derived DAn from monogenic LRRK2‐associated PD (L2PD) and sporadic PD (sPD) patients across the cell types involved in the cell reprogramming and differentiation processes.

Figure 2

  1. Principal component analysis (PCA) of methylation data from 28,363 CpG sites with variable methylation values (SD > 0.1) in iPSC‐derived DAn cell lines (n = 14). This analysis shows different DNA methylation profiles between PD patients and controls, and no differences between L2PD and sPD. PC, principal component.
  2. Bar diagram showing the number of differentially methylated CpGs (DMCpGs) among iPSC‐derived DAn lines (n = 14) as detected in multiple comparisons. This analysis indicates that L2PD and sPD share similar DNA methylation changes with respect to controls. Hypermeth, hypermethylation; hypometh, hypomethylation.
  3. Relative distribution of DMCpGs in PD iPSC‐derived DAn lines (n = 10) across inter‐ and intragenic regions (left), across different gene‐related regions (middle), and within CpG islands (CGI), CGI shores, CGI shelves, or outside CGI (right). Bkg, background (methylation platform).
  4. DNA methylation analysis across the cell types involved in the cell reprogramming and differentiation processes and also iPSC‐derived neural cultures not‐enriched‐in‐DAn. Scheme of the cell reprogramming and differentiation protocols (upper part of the panel). Heatmaps and density color code of the 2,087 DMCpGs identified in iPSC‐derived DAn from PD patients with respect to controls (n = 14), as well as their methylation status in parental fibroblasts (n = 9), undifferentiated iPSCs (n = 9), and iPSC‐derived neurons (not‐DAn) (n = 9) (lower part of the panel) (Wilcoxon rank test for independent samples with delta‐beta above ¦0.25¦ and FDR‐adjusted P < 0.05).

Figure EV1. Identification of epigenetic changes associated with monogenic and sporadic PD in iPSC‐derived DAn but not in other cell types.

Figure EV1

  1. Unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis of methylation data from 28,363 CpG sites with variable methylation values (SD > 0.1). This analysis shows different DNA methylation profiles in PD patients as compared to controls.
  2. Venn diagram representing the number of differentially methylated CpGs (DMCpGs) in iPSC‐derived DAn from monogenic (L2PD) or sporadic PD (sPD) patients with respect to controls (n = 14). Most DMCpGs in L2PD were common to sPD (78%) (upper part of the panel). Heatmaps of DMCpGs detected between L2PD and controls (n = 1,261) and between sPD and controls (n = 2,512) (lower part of the panel). This analysis shows that the methylation patterns of L2PD and sPD, either pooled as shown in Fig 2D, or as independent groups, are different from controls (Wilcoxon rank test for independent samples (n = 14) with delta‐beta above ¦0.25¦ and FDR‐adjusted P < 0.05). C, control.
  3. Principal component analysis (PCA) of methylation data from the 28,363 CpG sites with variable methylation values (SD > 0.1) in fibroblasts, undifferentiated iPSC, iPSC‐derived DAn, and iPSC‐derived neurons (not‐DAn). The PCA demonstrates that sample variability is attributable, in a decreasing manner, to (i) the cell type as expectable, (ii) the condition PD or control only in iPSC‐derived DAn, and (iii) the inter‐individual variability in a much lesser extent. These results indicate that methylation differences identified in PD were specific for DAn.
  4. DNA methylation analysis across all studied cell types as illustrated in one representative control (C‐02). Density scatter plots of CpG‐wise DNA methylation level differences, and density color code, for mean DNA methylation data of all autosomes comparing between fibroblasts and undifferentiated iPSCs, between undifferentiated iPSCs and iPSC‐derived DAn, between iPSC‐derived DAn and fibroblasts, and between iPSC‐derived DAn and iPSC‐derived neurons (not‐DAn). This analysis shows that the methylome is modulated during the in vitro cell reprogramming and differentiation processes.

Epigenetic changes manifest only in DAn from PD patients

We further investigated whether those DNA methylation changes observed in DAn were already present in fibroblasts or in undifferentiated iPSCs from the same subjects by analyzing a subset of representative individuals (two L2PD, two sPD, and three controls). Isogenic fibroblasts and iPSCs from these subjects showed no methylation differences between PD and controls neither for the 2,087 DMCpGs detected in iPSC‐derived DAn (Fig 2D) nor for any other given CpG (Fig EV1C) under an absolute mean methylation difference above 0.25 (Bibikova et al, 2011) and an adjusted P below 0.05. Yet fibroblasts, undifferentiated iPSCs and iPSC‐derived DAn showed distinct DNA methylomes as expected for each specific cell type (Doi et al, 2009; Hochedlinger & Plath, 2009) (Fig EV1D). Interestingly, a total of 75% of all the 2,087 DMCpGs did not change in the differentiation from iPSCs to DAn in PD patients, whereas only 40% DMCpGs remained unchanged in controls, suggesting an incomplete epigenomic remodeling in PD in spite of the successful reprogramming and differentiation into mature DAn (Sanchez‐Danes et al, 2012b) (Table EV3 and Fig EV2). These findings suggest that latent molecular defects in skin cells from PD patients become uncovered upon differentiation into DAn. This is compliant with the idea of PD as a systemic disease affecting other tissues apart from the nervous system (Hoepken et al, 2008; Beach et al, 2010; Shannon et al, 2012) including molecular defects which were previously reported in fibroblasts from L2PD or sPD patients (Papkovskaia et al, 2012; Ambrosi et al, 2014; Yakhine‐Diop et al, 2014). In addition, to address the extent of the methylation changes attributed to DAn alone in the context of cell heterogeneity inherent to iPSC‐derived DAn systems, we differentiated iPSCs from the same subjects into neural cultures not‐enriched‐in‐DAn by omitting the lentiviral‐mediated forced expression of the ventral midbrain determinant LMX1A and the supplementation with DAn patterning factors. This protocol results in a > 4‐fold depletion in the number of DAn (See Materials and Methods and (Sanchez‐Danes et al, 2012a)). In neural cultures not‐enriched‐in‐DAn, we did not find methylation differences between PD and controls under an absolute mean methylation difference above 0.25 (Bibikova et al, 2011) and an adjusted P below 0.05 (Fig EV1C). Moreover, the methylation profile from PD DAn was closer to that from neural cultures not‐enriched‐in‐DAn as compared to control DAn (Fig 2D). For any given comparison and using the same restrictive cutoffs mentioned above, we found that the overall methylation variability referred to all samples was attributable, in decreasing order, to (i) the different cell types as expected, (ii) the condition health/disease only in iPSC‐derived DAn, and (iii) inter‐individual differences in a relative lesser extent. Altogether, these results indicate that the identified PD epigenetic changes are specific for DAn cells and consist in the failure of PD DAn to fully acquire the mature epigenetic identity own to healthy DAn.

Figure EV2. Differentially methylated CpGs (DMCpGs) detected in PD iPSC‐derived DAn (n = 2,087) and comparison of their methylation status with respect to undifferentiated iPSCs.

Figure EV2

DNA methylation data derived from Fig 2D reorganized to show that a total of 75% of the 2,087 DMCpGs did not change in the differentiation from iPSCs to DAn in PD (right), whereas only 40% DMCpGs remained unchanged in controls (left), suggesting an incomplete epigenomic remodeling in PD in spite of the successful reprogramming and differentiation into mature DAn (Wilcoxon rank test for independent samples (n = 14) with delta‐beta above ¦0.25¦ and FDR‐adjusted < 0.05).

Gene and protein expression changes occur along with methylation changes

We next studied the transcriptome of iPSC‐derived DAn by using gene expression microarrays. Compliant to the methylome analysis, no differentially expressed gene (DEG) was found between L2PD and sPD, being most of DEGS in L2PD (93%) shared in sPD. As compared to controls, we identified 437 DEGs in the PD group as a whole under an adjusted P below 0.05 (Fig 3A and B, and Table EV4). These findings are in line with two previous studies reporting expression changes associated with PD in DAn, at least with L2PD (sPD not studied) (Nguyen et al, 2011; Reinhardt et al, 2013). Upregulated DEGs (n = 254) were largely involved in neural functions and transcription factor regulatory activity, whereas downregulated DEGs (n = 183) affected basic homeostasis (Table EV5). One upregulated DEG was SNCA (> 2.5‐fold), a gene involved in familial PD and sPD whose encoded protein, α‐synuclein, aggregates in Lewy body inclusions which represent a hallmark of PD (Lang & Lozano, 1998a,b). Another upregulated DEG was SYT11 (> 5‐fold) which has been top‐linked associated to PD across genomewide association studies (Nalls et al, 2014). We subsequently selected seven genes involved in neural functions from the top‐30 list of upregulated DEGs (OTX2, PAX6, ZIC1, SYT11, DCT, DCC, and NEFL) and SNCA to validate the array data by real‐time qPCR (Fig 3C) and to study their protein expression levels by immunoblot. We detected a > 2‐fold protein upregulation of all genes except NEFL (Fig EV3A). Moreover, protein expression of some DEGs co‐localized at the single‐cell level with the DAn marker tyrosine hydroxylase (Fig EV3C). These findings point toward the presence of gene and also protein expression changes in DAn from PD patients which occur simultaneously along with DNA methylation changes.

Figure 3. Genomewide gene expression analysis of iPSC‐derived DAn from PD patients and controls.

Figure 3

  1. Heatmap showing the 437 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) detected in PD patients with either L2PD (L2) or sPD (s) as compared to controls (C) (n = 14), and density color code for gene expression levels. This analysis indicates that L2PD and sPD share similar gene expression changes with respect to controls. A total of 254 DEGs were upregulated in PD whereas 183 showed significant downregulation (Linear model with empirical bayes moderation of the variance similar to ANOVA with FDR‐adjusted P < 0.05).
  2. Venn diagram representing the number of DEGs in iPSC‐derived DAn from PD patients with respect to healthy subjects (n = 14) showing that most DMCpGs in L2PD were common to sPD.
  3. Technical validation of 10 top DEGs in PD iPSC‐derived DAn as compared to controls (n = 14) identified by genomewide gene expression study (upper heat‐map) and validated by real‐time qPCR (lower heat‐map). Relative gene expression and statistical significances were calculated using the ΔΔCt method and GAPDH,ACTB, and PPIA as endogenous controls. Pearson correlation analysis between microarray and real‐time qPCR data showed a high degree of correlation (r 2 = 0.99, = 7.7 × 10−7) (bottom graph). L2, LRRK2‐associated PD; s, sporadic PD.

Figure EV3. Identification of protein expression deregulation in PD iPSC‐derived DAn.

Figure EV3

  1. Protein levels of top upregulated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in PD iPSC‐derived DAn as compared to controls (n = 14). Band densitometric quantification analysis of protein levels as determined by immunoblot and normalized to the expression of b‐actin or a‐tubulin. Two‐tailed Student's t‐test (**P < 0.01, *P < 0.05). All samples were studied in at least three independent experiments. Data are represented as group mean ± SEM. This analysis shows protein expression upregulation for all DEGs except NEFL (right). Representative immunoblots from PD patients (PD) and controls (C). Discontinuous white line indicates samples from the same blot re‐grouped for representation (left). See also source for Fig 7.
  2. Protein levels from key transcription factors (TFs) showing reduced gene expression and association with enhancer hypermethylation in PD iPSC‐derived DAn as compared to controls (n = 9). Band densitometric quantification analysis of protein levels from key TFs normalized to the expression of b‐actin. Two‐tailed Student's t‐test (**P < 0.01, *P < 0.05). All samples were studied in at least three independent experiments. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. This analysis shows protein expression downregulation for the key TFs NR3C1, HNF4A, and FOSL2 (right). Representative immunoblots in PD patients (PD) and controls (C) (left). See also source data for Fig 7.
  3. Immunofluorescence analysis of three DEGs showing co‐localization with the DAn‐specific marker tyrosine hydroxilase (TH) as illustrated in one representative sPD patient (PD‐10). The transcription factors OTX2 or PAX6 showed nuclear localization, whereas the transmembrane protein DCC showed a cellular distribution. Red, OTX2, PAX6, or DCC; green, TH. Nuclei are counterstained with DAPI, shown in blue (Scale bar, 10 μm).

PD DNA mehtylation changes are associated with gene expression

We then analyzed the relationship between gene expression and DNA methylation levels in iPSC‐derived DAn from PD patients. We found a significant correlation in 17% of the 2,087 DMCpGs (n = 353) involving 239 different genes (Fig 4A and B). The percentage of correlation between methylation and expression was similar to that reported in other studies (Kulis et al, 2012). Of the 353 unique correlating DMCpGs, a total of 73% showed an inverse association of DNA methylation and expression, whereas the remaining 27% DMCpGs were positively associated (Table EV6). DMCpGs showing inverse association were situated in introns and 5′ untranslated regions, whereas those with positive association were enriched in introns (Fig 4C). Globally, DMCpGs showing association with gene expression were more frequently located in introns (49%) than in 5′ regions (24%). These findings suggest that, as reported in cell differentiation and cancer (Jones, 2012; Kulis et al, 2012, 2013), PD gene‐body DNA methylation changes play a role in regulating gene expression, both inversely and positively.

Figure 4. Correlation between DNA methylation values of differentially methylated CpGs (DMCpGs) and expression levels of the associated genes in PD iPSC‐derived DAn.

Figure 4

  1. Graphical representation of the percentage of DMCpGs associated with gene expression.
  2. Examples of genes showing significant correlation including a brief functional description: OTX2, transcription factor for midbrain DAn development which blocks LMX1A;DCT, dopachrome tautomerase, induced by OTX2, is a detoxifying enzyme of DA metabolites involved in the synthesis of neuromelanin; DRD4, DA receptor type 4; CASP8, apoptosis extrinsic pathway member inducing CASP3;ERC2, cytoskeleton organizer at nerve terminals for neurotransmission; NELL2, neural epidermal growth factor‐like 2 involved in neural differentiation.
  3. Counts of DMCpGs associated with gene expression across gene‐related regions.
  4. Relative distribution of DMCpGs across chromatin states. Poised P, poised promoter; Txn, transcription; Heterochr, heterochromatin.
  5. Counts of DMCpGs associated with gene expression across chromatin states.
Data information: In (A) and (B), n = 14 cell lines, Spearman correlation analysis with FDR‐adjusted < 0.05.

Differential DNA methylation in PD is enriched in enhancer elements

We further studied the potential molecular mechanisms underlying the association between DNA methylation and gene expression. We analyzed our data in the context of recently available functional chromatin states (Ernst et al, 2011). Hypermethylated DMCpGs were highly enriched in enhancer elements (35% vs. 12% in the background, = 0.3 × 10−14), while hypomethylated DMCpGs were enriched in Polycomb‐repressed regions (31% vs. 12% in the background, = 0.2 × 10−14) (Fig 4D). When considering only the DMCpGs correlating with gene expression, DMCpGs with inverse correlation were located in promoters and enhancers, whereas DMCpGs with positive correlation were associated with repressed regions (Fig 4E). These results suggest that PD‐associated DNA methylation changes target functionally active sequences.

PD enhancer hypermethylation is associated with the downregulation of a TFs network

We next inquired whether the DMCpGs identified in PD patients were enriched for transcription factor (TF)‐binding sites (TFBSs). To this end, we overlapped our data with TFBS clusters generated by ChIP‐seq in the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements project (Dunham et al, 2012; Gerstein et al, 2012; Lee et al, 2012). We found enrichment for binding sites of 23 TFs in PD‐hypermethylated DMCpGs and of only two TFs in PD‐hypomethylated DMCpGs (Fig 5A and Table EV7). Since the PD‐associated hypermethylation affected most prominently to enhancer elements (35%) (Fig 4D), we focused on this chromatin state and observed that 65% of all PD hypermethylated enhancers became demethylated from iPSCs to DAn in controls, whereas only 8% significantly lost methylation in PD patients which overall retained higher methylation levels (Table EV3 and Fig 2D). Furthermore, among the 23 TFs showing TFBS enrichment, we found reduced gene expression of four TFs, namely FOXA1, NR3C1, HNF4A, and FOSL2, whose downregulation was also significantly associated with increased methylation levels at enhancer DMCpGs in PD (Fig 5B–D). Moreover, variable expression of these TFs together with the expression of other TFs was coordinated in PD DAn (Fig 6), suggesting that the expression level of a TF network, rather than that of individual TFs, was associated with the hypermethylation of enhancers in PD. In addition, HNF4A and FOSL2 showed a significant downregulation of protein levels as detected by immunoblot, whereas NR3C1 showed a downregulation trend which did not reach significance (Figs 7A and EV3B, and Source data for Fig 7). These data complement recent work linking TF binding to enhancers and tissue‐specific hypomethylation (Stadler et al, 2011; Hon et al, 2013; Xie et al, 2013; Ziller et al, 2013), and also downregulation of TF networks to enhancer hypermethylation (Agirre et al, 2015). Our findings suggest that the incomplete epigenetic remodeling observed for the 2,087 DMCpGs identified in iPSC‐derived DAn from PD patients might be mediated by the aberrant downregulation of a network of key TFs whose deficiency could prevent their target sites to become demethylated during the differentiation from iPSCs to DAn.

Figure 5. Association between gene expression levels of transcription factors (TFs) and DNA methylation levels at PD‐hypermethylated enhancers from PD iPSC‐derived DAn.

Figure 5

  1. Relative enrichment of TF‐binding sites (TFBSs) overlapping with the 2,087 DMCpGs detected in PD iPSC‐derived DAn (n = 10). This analysis shows an enrichment of binding sites for 23 TFs in regions hypermethylated in PD.
  2. Bar plot showing the results of the Spearman correlation analysis between levels of TF gene expression and of average DNA methylation at the 376 enhancer sites hypermethylated in PD iPSC‐derived DAn (n = 10). Coef, coefficient.
  3. Graphical representation of average methylation at PD‐associated enhancers and gene expression of the key TFs FOXA1,NR3C1,HNF4A, and FOSL2 in iPSC‐derived DAn (n = 14).
  4. Scatter plots of key TF gene expression and DNA methylation levels at enhancers in iPSC‐derived DAn (n = 14).
Data information: Fisher's exact test with a FDR adjusted < 0.05 in (A), and Spearman correlation analysis with FDR < 0.05 in (B) and (D).

Figure 6. Correlation matrix of gene expression levels among TFs showing TF‐binding sites (TFBS) enrichment at PD‐hypermethylated enhancers.

Figure 6

Pearson correlation coefficients and correlation P‐values were calculated evaluating TF gene expression levels in iPSC‐derived DAn from PD patients and controls (n = 14) under a 2‐tailed Student's t‐test. Among TFs showing coordinated expression, maximal correlation was observed for FOXA1,FOXA2,NR3C1,HNF4A, and FOSL2.

Figure 7. Gene and protein expression of PD downregulated key TFs and proposed theoretic model.

Figure 7

  • A, B
    Graphical representation of gene and protein expression of the key TFs FOXA1,NR3C1,HNF4A, and FOSL2 (A) (see also Fig EV3B and Source data for Fig 7), or of the PD upregulated genes (B) (see also Fig EV3A and Source data for Fig 7) identified in iPSC‐derived DAn from PD patients, normalized to the expression of controls, and expressed, respectively, as log2 or lineal fold change (FC) values. (For gene expression, linear model with empirical bayes moderation of the variance similar to ANOVA with FDR‐adjusted P < 0.05; for protein expression, two‐tailed Student's t‐test (**P < 0.01, *P < 0.05). Samples were studied at least in three independent experiments. Data are represented as group mean ± SEM).
  • C
    Proposed model in which deficits of the key TFs FOXA1,NR3C1,HNF4A, and FOSL2 relevant to PD lead to DNA methylation changes. Key 1 denotes differentially methylated gene, key 2 denotes DEG, key 3 denotes significant correlation of DNA methylation with proximal gene expression, key 4 denotes significant correlation of key TF gene expression with distal DNA methylation at enhancers, and key 5 denotes differentially expressed protein. Blue‐shaded boxes indicate gene expression downregulation, whereas red‐shaded boxes indicate upregulation. Illustration of our model was built by selecting most prominent alterations detected by unbiased genomewide approaches in our study.

Source data are available online for this figure.

Discussion

We report the first genomewide DNA methylation study of iPSC‐derived DAn in PD. We found that DAn from PD patients are epigenetically altered with respect to healthy controls and that DAn from monogenic L2PD and sPD share similar DNA methylation abnormalities. These methylation changes cannot be explained by technical biases since all iPSC‐derived DAn lines were equally generated and characterized in parallel, blind to the researcher, and differentiated DAn had similar morphological and functional properties (Sanchez‐Danes et al, 2012b). We also found that the PD‐associated methylation changes were not present in parental skin cells or undifferentiated iPSCs and become uncovered only upon differentiation into the DAn cells targeted in PD. In addition, the methylation profile of DAn from PD patients, with either monogenic or sporadic PD, resembled that of neural cultures not‐enriched‐in‐DAn indicating a failure to fully acquire the epigenetic identity own to healthy DAn in PD. We also detected that gene and protein expression changes occur simultaneously along with methylation alterations in PD and that these alterations are similar in monogenic L2PD and sPD. Finally, we found that the DNA methylation changes present in PD DAn are partially associated with gene expression, target gene regulatory sequences such as enhancers, and correlate with the RNA and protein downregulation of a network of TFs.

The lack of DNA methylation differences between DAn from patients with L2PD and sPD provides the proof‐of‐concept of common or at least converging epigenomic changes in these disease forms (Zhu et al, 2011). However, one limitation of our work is that we studied only one monogenic form of PD (L2PD) and therefore the epigenetic involvement in other PD familial forms remains to be explored. Our findings are compliant with the observation that L2PD is clinical and neuropathologically similar to sPD lacking LRRK2 mutations (Healy et al, 2008). Yet the interpretation of our results requires further considerations. First, the epigenome is expected to reflect the influence from the environment and thus one possibility is that unknown environmental factors could trigger epigenomic changes in PD patients. This environmental contribution would be expectable for sPD (Feil & Fraga, 2011), but the age‐dependent reduced penetrance of the LRRK2 G2019S mutation together with its identification not only in monogenic but also in sPD cases (Healy et al, 2008) could also support an environmental involvement in L2PD (Farrer, 2006; Urdinguio et al, 2009). Second, an alternative possibility is that the genetic background from PD patients could drive DNA methylation changes not only in monogenic L2PD as expectable but also in sPD. In this regard, it has been described that sPD could be caused by an accumulation of common polygenic alleles with relatively low effect sizes (Escott‐Price et al, 2015). Thus, a possible integrative interpretation of our findings is that cumulative genetic risk factors such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) or copy number variants (CNVs) in sPD, or LRRK2 mutations in L2PD, alone or in combination with still unknown environmental factors could be underlying the common epigenetic changes detected in both disease forms. These environmental and/or genetic factors arising from different but converging pathways could ultimately cause common end‐point alterations in L2PD and sPD.

The PD epigenetic changes were present only in iPSC‐derived DAn but not in undifferentiated iPSC, in fibroblasts, nor in iPSC‐derived neural cultures not‐enriched‐in‐DAn. These results indicate that the PD‐associated DNA methylation changes are specific of DAn but not of other types since neural cultures not‐enriched‐in‐DAn did not reveal methylation differences. They also suggest that molecular defects, of an environmental and/or genetic origin as discussed above, should be carried from the PD patient, latent in fibroblasts, and manifested only upon differentiation into DAn. Here it should be mentioned that although in PD when and where the degenerative process starts is unclear, and the related underlying biological changes remain unknown, several works have reported molecular defects in fibroblasts from L2PD and also from other PD monogenic forms (Hoepken et al, 2008; Rakovic et al, 2013; Ambrosi et al, 2014; Yakhine‐Diop et al, 2014). In this context, our findings are compatible with the emerging notion of PD as a systemic disease affecting other tissues apart from the nervous system (Beach et al, 2010; Shannon et al, 2012).

The methylation profile from PD DAn resembled that of neural cultures not‐enriched‐in‐DAn indicating a failure in PD to fully acquire the epigenetic identity own to healthy DAn. The methylation changes identified in PD occurred in spite of the apparently normal dopaminergic phenotypes observed in our early 30‐days DAn cultures which consisted in functionally and morphologically mature DAn which were similar in PD and controls (Sanchez‐Danes et al, 2012b). This is in agreement with previous studies describing normal dopaminergic phenotypes in PD iPSC‐derived DAn (Byers et al, 2011; Nguyen et al, 2011; Cooper et al, 2012; Rakovic et al, 2013; Reinhardt et al, 2013) with the exception of one Parkin study reporting altered dopamine release and uptake (Jiang et al, 2012). However, we found that the epigenetic changes detected in our early 30‐days DAn cultures antedated late (75‐days), spontaneous (not‐drug induced), PD‐associated phenotypes which were previously described in our model and included impaired axonal outgrowth, deficient autophagic vacuole clearance, and accumulation of α‐synuclein (Sanchez‐Danes et al, 2012b; Orenstein et al, 2013). Consistent with our methylation findings, these PD phenotypes were also common in DAn from L2PD and sPD patients (Sanchez‐Danes et al, 2012b). Yet although the early DNA methylation changes reported here antedated these long‐term PD phenotypes potential causality needs to be explored in future works.

As reported in cell differentiation and cancer (Jones, 2012; Kulis et al, 2012, 2013), we found that the identified epigenetic changes correlate partially with expression, indicating that PD gene‐body DNA methylation changes play a role in the regulation of gene expression. We also found that the PD DNA hypermethylation changes are prominent at enhancer regulatory regions. In line with other studies (Agirre et al, 2015), we also found that in PD, the hypermethylation of enhancers appears to be related to the downregulation of a network of key TFs, rather than of individual TFs. These data complement recent work linking TF binding to enhancers and tissue‐specific hypomethylation (Stadler et al, 2011; Hon et al, 2013; Xie et al, 2013; Ziller et al, 2013) and suggest a theoretic model in which the incomplete epigenetic remodeling in PD DAn might be related to the downregulation of a network of key TFs whose deficiency could prevent their binding sites to become demethylated during the differentiation from iPSCs to DAn. Key TFs from this network have been previously associated with the specification of the substantia nigra (FOXA1, NR3C1, and HNF4) and of fetal brain (FOSL2) (Ziller et al, 2013). Of these, FOXA1 is involved in maintaining the dopaminergic phenotype in adult mesodienchepalic DAn (Stott et al, 2013; Domanskyi et al, 2014), whereas the glucocorticoid receptor NR3C1 regulates DAn neurodegeneration in PD (Ros‐Bernal et al, 2011). Downregulation of HNF4A has been reported in blood from PD patients as a PD biomarker correlating with motor symptoms severity (Potashkin et al, 2012; Santiago & Potashkin, 2015), whereas FOSL2 has been linked to dyskinesia, a major side effect in the DA substitutive treatment with L‐DOPA (Cao et al, 2010). Since these TFs seem to be relevant to the development and maintenance of midbrain DAn in PD (Lahti et al, 2011, 2012), their deficiency might be related to impairments in the maintenance of a differentiated DAn epigenetic cellular identity in PD (Holmberg & Perlmann, 2012). In this theoretic model, the upregulation of gene and protein expression of other TFs (OTX2, PAX6, or ZIC1) and genes (SNCA, DCC, or DCT) (Figs 7B and EV3A, and Source data for Fig 7) might transiently circumvent deficits of the network of key TFs, at least in early culture stages.

One hypothesis proposes the neurodevelopmental origin of neurodegenerative diseases in the sense that molecular mechanisms occurring during development are abnormally recapitulated in neurodegenerative disease processes (Goedert et al, 1993; Schafer & Stevens, 2010). For example, a recent study showed that neural degeneration in Alzheimer's disease involves the abnormal re‐activation of cellular self‐destruction mechanisms which take place during neural development (Nikolaev et al, 2009). Since we found that the epigenetic pattern from PD iPSC‐derived DAn showed certain similarities to neural cultures not‐enriched‐in‐DAn, our data could be interpreted in light of this theory pointing towards the presence of possible developmental epigenetic defects associated with PD. In addition, developmental deficits of TFs which are key in the differentiation of DAn have been recently linked to PD (Laguna et al, 2015).

We showed that iPSC‐derived DAn from PD patients exhibit epigenomic and transcriptomic alterations, and therefore, our findings may have implications for future cell replacement therapies. The use of pluripotent stem cells has proved as a valuable in vitro system to investigate disease, as well as a promising tool for brain transplantation and dopaminergic restoration in PD. Yet the generation of DAn for cell replacement is still matter of research (Lindvall & Bjorklund, 2011). Recently, the autologous transplantation of iPSC‐derived neurons into the striatum of healthy monkeys has been suggested to be advantageous as compared to allogenic grafts, at least in terms of reduced immunogenicity (Morizane et al, 2013). Our study suggests that future cell therapeutic strategies should pay attention to the correct epigenomic status of the reprogrammed dopaminergic cells, especially when using patient own cells. In summary, using a patient‐specific iPSC‐based DAn system, our study provides the first evidence that epigenetic deregulation is associated with both monogenic and sporadic PD.

Materials and Methods

PD patients and generation of iPSC‐derived DAn

We used mature iPSC‐derived DAn lines of 30‐days of differentiation generated and characterized in parallel blind to researcher previously (Sanchez‐Danes et al, 2012b) using a published protocol (Sanchez‐Danes et al, 2012a). Expanded subject information, cell characterization, and technical details are extensively described in these precedent studies where they should be consulted. Of these, a summary presented in Table 1, Fig 1, and here as it follows. Arm surface skin biopsies of 3 mm of diameter were obtained from LRRK2 PD patients carrying the G2019S mutation (L2PD, n = 4); sporadic PD patients lacking family history of PD and mutations in known PD genes (sPD, n = 6); and gender‐ and age‐matched healthy individuals without neurological disease history (controls, n = 4). Primary cultures of keratinocytes or fibroblasts were reprogrammed using retroviral delivery of OCT4, KLF4, and SOX2 to generate 2–6 iPSC lines per individual (n = 50 lines). Of these, we selected the two more homogenous lines per subject which were thoroughly characterized and shown to be fully reprogrammed to pluripotency. For the directed differentiation of iPSC to ventral midbrain dopaminergic neurons (vmDAn), we used a 30‐days protocol based on the lentiviral‐mediated forced expression of the vmDAn determinant LMX1A together with DAn patterning factors and co‐culture with mouse PA6 feeding cells to provide trophic factor support. DAn pellets were obtained by mechanic separation of the PA6 layer with a finely drawn Pasteur pipette. Differentiated cells were 30‐days vmDAn‐enriched cultures of morphologically fully mature DAn lacking PD neural phenotypes (Sanchez‐Danes et al, 2012b), mostly of the A9 subtype which showed properties of TH+ mature neurons: (i) electrophysiological analysis showed action potentials, (ii) the majority of DAn presented the typical bipolar morphology, (iii) co‐expressed the A9 subtype marker GIRK2, and (iv) co‐expressed the DA transporter (DAT). Collectively, studied iPSC‐derived DAn were sufficiently mature, in a similar and comparable manner for both PD and control cultures, to be functional and to spontaneously form active neural networks.

Calcium fluorescence imaging of iPSC‐derived DAn

We used the cell‐permeant fluorescence dye Fluo‐4‐AM (Life Technologies) in combination with an imaging device to monitor spontaneous activity in PD and control cells. This fluorescence probe becomes active upon binding with calcium, therefore signaling the occurrence of action potentials in the neurons. Cultures of either PD or control cells were cultured in 30‐mm‐diameter petri dishes for 30‐days and their activity monitored as follows. Prior to imaging, the culture dish was first washed with 4 ml PBS at room temperature to remove the original culture medium. The culture was next incubated for 30 min in a solution that contained 1 ml of recording medium (RM, consisting of 128 mM NaCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 45 mM sucrose, 10 mM glucose, and 0.01 M Hepes; treated to pH 7.4) and 4 μg/ml of Fluo‐4. The culture was then washed with fresh RM to remove residual free Fluo‐4, and finally, a volume of 4 ml of RM was left in the dish for actual recordings. The culture dish was mounted on a Zeiss inverted microscope equipped with a CMOS camera (Hamamatsu Orca Flash 2.8) and an arc lamp for fluorescence. Gray‐scale images of neuronal activity were acquired at intervals of 50 ms, and in a field of view that contained on the order of 100 cells. Cultures were visualized for 30 min at room temperature. The acquired data was next analyzed to extract the fluorescence traces for each neuron. In order to compare the fluorescence traces among neurons and cultures, the raw fluorescence signal F(t) of a given neuron was normalized as F*(t) = %ΔF/F = 100 * (F(t) − F0)/F0, where F0 is the fluorescence signal of the neuron at rest. Spontaneous neuronal activations were revealed in the fluorescence signal as a sharp increase of typically a 10% respect to the resting state.

Generation of iPSC‐derived neural cultures not‐enriched‐in‐DAn

iPSC‐derived neural cultures not‐enriched‐in‐DAn were generated as technical controls from a subset of PD patients (n = 6) and healthy subjects (n = 3) using the previously described protocol (Sanchez‐Danes et al, 2012a) but omitting the lentiviral expression of the vmDAn determinant LMX1A and DAn patterning factors. The lentiviral delivery of LMX1A results in a > 4‐fold enrichment of the total final number of DAn to ~30% as compared to only ~7% without LMX1A (Sanchez‐Danes et al, 2012a). Embryoid body (EB) formation was induced for forced aggregation and maintained in suspension in the presence of MEF condition medium for 3 days. EBs were then maintained for 10 days in ultralow attachment plates in N2B27 medium in the presence of FGF2. After that, EBs were transferred to matrigel‐coated plastic chamber slides and cultured in the differentiation medium in the absence of FGF2 for 30‐days. The medium for each condition was changed every other day.

DNA, RNA, and protein isolation

DNA, RNA, and proteins were isolated from one million cells using the Allprep DNA‐RNA‐Protein kit (QIAGEN). Concentration and quality of DNA and RNA were, respectively, determined in a Nanodrop 1000 Spectrophotometer and in an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. Total protein concentration was assessed with the BCA assay (Thermo Scientific).

DNA methylation analysis

The EZ DNA Methylation Kit (Zymo Research) was used for bisulfite conversion of 1,000 ng genomic DNA. Bisulfite‐converted DNA was hybridized onto the Infinium Human Methylation 450K BeadChip Kit (Illumina) which covers 99% of the RefSeq genes and 96% of CpG islands at a single‐base resolution (refer to Product Datasheet: http://www.illumina.com/products/methylation_450_beadchip_kits.ilmn). We have previously demonstrated a correlation coefficient of findings above 95% between the Illumina 450k platform and whole‐genome bisulfite sequencing (Kulis et al, 2012). The Infinium methylation assay was carried out following criteria requested for this platform (Bibikova et al, 2011). All the array experiments were performed simultaneously at the same day, and PD and control samples were randomized at each BeadChip, ruling out any potential batch effect. Array data were analyzed by minfi package available through Bioconductor (Kasper Daniel Hansen and Martin Aryee. Minfi: Analyze Illumina's 450k methylation arrays. R package version 3.0.1). To exclude technical biases, we used an optimized pipeline with several filters developed at the Unidad de Hematopatología at IDIBAPS (Kulis et al, 2012). From the initial dataset of 485,512 sites (excluding probes detecting SNPs), we removed those with poor detection P‐values (> 0.01, n = 670) and those with sex‐specific DNA methylation (n = 6,614). The remaining 478,228 sites were used for downstream analyses. Single CpG quantitative methylation values (beta values) in each sample were calculated as the ratio of the methylated signal intensity to the sum of methylated and unmethylated signals. Resulting quantitative methylation values ranged from 0, fully unmethylated, to 1, fully methylated CpGs. DNA from pure mouse PA6 cell cultures was included as a control sample that did not hybridize at readable levels in the human Illumina 450k methylation array, therefore not influencing methylation findings.

Genomic annotation of CpGs

The 450k Human Methylation Array data was annotated using the current hg19 version of the UCSC Genome Browser as reference sequence. We assigned the CpGs into discrete categories according to their location with respect to gene‐related regions: 10‐kb 5′ region (10,000 to 1,501 bp upstream of the transcriptional start site (TSS)), 1.5‐kb 5′ region (1,500 to 201 bp upstream of the TSS), TSS 200 (200 to 1 bp upstream of the TSS), 5′ UTR, gene first exon, gene body (from the first intron to the last exon), 3′ UTR, 1.5‐kb 3′ region (1 to 1,500 bp downstream of the 3′UTR), 10‐kb 3′ region (1,501 to 10,000 bp downstream of the 3′UTR), and intergenic regions. Owing to the presence of alternative transcription start sites and regions containing more than one gene, some CpGs were assigned multiple gene annotations. For the DMCpGs location relative to a CpG island (CGI), we used the categories: within CGI, in CGI shore (up to 2 kb from the CGI edge), in CGI shelf (from 2 to 4 kb from the CGI edge), and outside CGI.

Statistics: identification of differentially methylated CpGs

For each CpG, we computed the difference between the DNA methylation level in the two groups under comparison. Subsequently, CpGs were considered differentially methylated (DMCpGs) when showing a delta‐beta methylation difference above ¦0.25¦ and a false discovery rate (FDR)‐adjusted P Wilcoxon rank test for independent samples below 0.05. A delta‐beta above ¦0.20¦ is detectable with a 99% confidence in our methylation platform (Bibikova et al, 2011). Consistently, the same cutoff of delta‐beta above ¦0.25¦ and FDR‐adjusted < 0.05 was used in our study to identify statistically significant methylation differences (DMCpGs) between cases and controls in iPSC‐derived DAn, fibroblasts, undifferentiated iPSC, and iPSC‐derived neural cultures not‐enriched‐in‐DAn for any given comparison.

Statistics: Gene expression analysis and identification of differentially expressed genes

We hybridized 100 ng of RNA onto the Genechip Human Exon 1.0 ST Array (Affymetrix) which covers > 96% of the human transcriptome. Using a robust multi‐array analysis (RMA) algorithm (Irizarry et al, 2003), pre‐processing of microarray data resulted in single gene log2‐transformed values from 36,079 transcripts (22,014 Entrez RefSeq. genes). We filtered out (i) genes with group mean signals < 50 percentile of all signals, and (ii) genes with standard deviation (SD) < 50 percentile of all SDs. The remaining 4,686 Entrez RefSeq genes were used for downstream analysis. RNA from pure mouse PA6 cell cultures was included as a control sample that did not hybridize at readable levels in the Affymetrix human array, therefore not influencing expression findings. We used the Bioconductor Limma package to detect differentially expressed genes (DEGs) under a linear model with empirical bayes moderation of the variance similar to ANOVA developed to adjust for small sample size in microarray studies (Smyth, 2004). A FDR‐adjusted < 0.05 was used to identify DEGs.

Real‐time quantitative RT–PCR

We analyzed by real‐time qPCR the expression levels of ten DEGs identified by the genomewide gene expression microarray: OTX2, PAX6, ZIC1, DCT, NEFL, DCC, SYT11, SNCA, CAV1, and TFPI2 (Fig 3). cDNA was synthesized using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems). We used 1 ng of cDNA for each real‐time qPCR. Gene amplification was done using pre‐designed Taqman Gene Expression assays in a StepOnePlus Real‐time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). The log2 fold change (FC) values and statistical significances of DEGs were calculated using the ΔΔCt method in the DataAssist v3.0 software (Applied Biosystems). We normalized the expression of DEGs to the housekeeping genes glyceraldehydes‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), beta‐actin (ACTB), and cyclophylin A (PPIA). Pearson correlation between microarray and real‐time qPCR data was computed using the SPSS 16.0 software. Commercially available assay numbers are as it follows: OTX2 (hs00222238_m1), PAX6 (hs00240871_m1), ZIC1 (hs00602749_m1), DCT (hs01098278_m1), NEFL (hs00196245_m1), DCC (hs00180437_m1), SYT11 (hs00383056_m1), SNCA (hs01103383_m1), CAV1 (hs00971716_m1), TFPI2 (hs00197918_m1), GAPDH (hs02758991_g1), ACTB (hs01060665_g1), and PPIA (hs04194521_s1).

Biological enrichment analysis

To determine whether genes associated with DMCpGs (1,178 genes/2,087 CpGs) or DEGs (n = 437) in PD were enriched in particular gene ontology (GO) terms, we used the Functional Annotation Tool (FAT) of the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) (Huang da et al, 2009). Multiple hypothesis test correction was performed using the Benjamini & Hochberg algorithm (Benjamini, 1995).

Correlation of DNA methylation and expression data

Based on common gene annotations, DNA methylation data from 2,087 PD‐associated DMCpGs and gene expression data from all 36,079 transcripts were overlapped. We detected 2,430 annotating pairs. Subsequently, Spearman correlation analysis was done under a FDR‐adjusted < 0.05.

Transcriptional and epigenomic characterization of differentially methylated sites

We analyzed our data in the context of functional chromatin states using the NHEK keratinocyte as background cell line (Ernst et al, 2011) which is similar to the cells used to generate iPSCs in our study. We considered regions with states 1 and 2 (designated as “active promoter” and “weak promoter”) as “promoter regions”; state 3 as “poised promoters”; states 4, 5, 6, and 7 (designated as “strong enhancer” and “weak/poised enhancer”) as “enhancer regions”; state 8 as “insulator”; states 9 and 10 (designated as “transcriptional transition” and “transcriptional elongation”) as “strong transcription regions”; state 11 as “weak transcription”; state 12 as “Polycomb repressed”; and states 13, 14, and 15 (designated as “heterochromatin (nuclear lamina)” and “repetitive heterochromatin”) as “heterochromatin regions”.

Transcription factor analysis

We overlapped the methylation data from 2,087 PD DMCpGs with transcription factor (TF)‐binding site (TFBS) clusters generated by ChIP‐seq in the ENCODE project (Dunham et al, 2012; Gerstein et al, 2012; Lee et al, 2012) and available at the UCSC Genome Browser (http://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgTrackUi?db=hg19&g=wgEncodeHaibTfbs). For each TF, we calculated the log2 ratio of the proportion of TFBSs in the lists of hyper‐ and hypomethylated DMCpGs as compared to that in the whole methylation array (Table EV7). A Fisher exact test with a FDRadjusted < 0.05 resulted in 25 significant TFs. Of these, 23 TFs showed enrichment of binding sites at PD‐hypermethylated DMCpGs. Spearman correlation analysis was done under a FDR < 0.05 to study the association between average methylation levels at hypermethylated DMCpGs from enhancer sites, annotated in the NHEK background, and the gene expression of related TFs.

Immunoblotting

We used the following primary antibodies: rabbit anti‐FOXA1 (Abcam, 1:500, #ab23738), rabbit anti‐NR3C1 (Santa Cruz, 1:2,000, #sc1002), goat anti‐HNF4A (Santa Cruz, 1:1,000, #sc6556), rabbit anti‐FOSL2 (Santa Cruz, 1:500, #sc604), rabbit anti‐OTX2 (Millipore, 1:1,000, #ab9566), rabbit anti‐PAX6 (Covance, 1:500, #prb278p), rabbit anti‐ZIC1 (Abcam, 1:1,000, #ab72694), mouse anti‐SYT11 (Santa Cruz, 1:500, #sc365991), rabbit anti‐DCT (Santa Cruz, 1:250, #sc25544), mouse anti‐DCC (BD Pharmigen, 1:2,000, #554223), mouse anti‐SNCA (BD Transduction Laboratories, 1:500, #610787), mouse anti‐NEFL (Sigma, 1:500, #5139), mouse anti‐β‐actin (Sigma, 1:5,000, #A5441), and mouse anti‐α‐tubulin (Sigma, 1:10,000, #T5168). Nitrocellulose membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies diluted in 2% BSA/PBS. Appropriate secondary antibody (anti‐mouse and anti‐rabbit from Amersham Biosciences, or anti‐goat from Santa Cruz), coupled to horseradish peroxidase and diluted in 1% milk powder/PBS (1:5,000 dilution), were incubated 1 h at room temperature, followed by repeated washing with PBS. Immunoreactive bands were visualized using the SuperSignal Femto Chemiluminescent Substrate (Pierce) in the ImageQuant RT ECL imaging system (GE Healthcare). Protein band intensity was quantified by densitometry using the ImageJ Software. A total of 10 PD samples and four controls were studied for OTX2, PAX6, ZIC1, SYT11, DCT, DCC, SNCA, and NEFL. In the case of FOXA1, NR3C1, HNF4A, and FOSL2, six PD cases and three controls were analyzed as to illustrate extremes of a gene expression continuum that gradually increases from PD to controls. In both cases, a two‐tailed Student's t‐test was used to compare the PD and control groups. All samples were assayed in at least three independent experiments. Data in Figs 7A and B, and EV3A and B are represented as group mean ± SEM.

Immunofluorescence

iPSC‐derived DAn were grown on plastic cover slide chambers, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and then permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X‐100 in TBS. Cells were then blocked in 0.5% Triton X‐100 with 3% donkey serum for 2 h before 4°C overnight incubation with the appropriate primary antibodies. We used the following antibodies: mouse anti‐TH (Chemicon, 1:1,000, #mab5280), rabbit anti‐TH (Sigma, 1:1,000, #t8700), mouse anti‐TUJ1 (Covance, 1:500, #mms435p), rabbit anti‐GIRK2 (Sigma, 1:40, #P8122), goat anti‐FOXA2 (R&D Systems, 1:100, #AF2400), rabbit anti‐NURR1 (Santa Cruz, 1:200, #sc‐991), mouse anti‐SYP (Millipore, 1:500, #MAB332), rabbit anti‐OTX2 (Millipore, 1:1,000, #ab9566), rabbit anti‐PAX6 (Covance, 1:100, #prb278p), and mouse anti‐DCC (BD Pharmigen, 1:250, #554223). Secondary antibodies used were all from the Alexa Fluor Series (Invitrogen, all 1:500). Images were taken using a Leica SP5 confocal microscope. For quantification of stained cells, randomly 300 cells per differentiated aggregate were counted (average 5–6 differentiated aggregates per experiment). Data points represent the average of at least three independent experiments. To visualize nuclei, slides were stained with 0.5 μg/ml DAPI (4′,6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole) and then mounted with PVA/DABCO.

Study approval

This study has been conducted conforming the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Belmont Report. The Commission on Guarantees for Donation and Use of Human Tissues and Cells of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) and the local ethics committee at the Hospital Clínic de Barcelona approved the study. All subjects gave written informed consent prior to their participation in the study.

Accession number

Genomewide DNA methylation and gene expression datasets generated in this study have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession GSE16453. Summaries of analyses on these crude data may be found at Tables EV1, EV3, EV4, and EV6.

The paper explained.

Problem

As a complex multifactorial neurodegenerative disorder, pathogenic mechanisms of Parkinson's disease (PD) remain poorly understood. This is in part due to the inaccessibility to the dopaminergic neurons (DAn) targeted by disease which are only available postmortem.

Results

Upon cell reprogramming of somatic skin cells (fibroblasts) into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC), we generated DAn from patients with sporadic PD (sPD) (90‐95% of cases) and patients with a less frequent familial form caused by mutations in the gene LRRK2 (L2PD). Using genomewide approaches, we found large epigenomic (DNA methylation) and gene expression changes in DAn from PD patients as compared to healthy subjects. Interestingly, these changes were largely similar in sPD and familial L2PD. In addition, the PD epigenetic changes were specific for DAn since fibroblasts, iPSCs, or other neural types (not‐DAn) derived from the same PD patients did not show epigenetic abnormalities. Moreover, the PD epigenetic changes affected prominently to regulatory regions (hypermethylation of enhancers) and were related to the gene or protein downregulation of a network of transcription factors which is relevant to PD.

Impact

Using a patient‐specific iPSC‐derived DAn model, our findings indicate that: (i) epigenetic deregulation occurs in PD, (ii) PD‐associated changes are similar in the sporadic and the L2PD familial form suggesting common etiologic processes and potential applicability of common therapeutic treatments, and (iii) future iPSC‐based cell therapy strategies should pay attention to the correct epigenomic status of the reprogrammed DAn if using patient own cells.

Author contributions

RF‐S and ME conceived the study. IC‐C and GC contributed equally to this work. RF‐S, AC, JIM‐S, ME, and ET jointly supervised research. RF‐S, IC‐C, AR, MV, AC, JIM‐S, and ME conceived and designed the experiments. RF‐S, IC‐C, RT, YR, AS‐D, RV‐B, JS, and ME performed the experiments. RF‐S, IC‐C, GC, AS‐P, JLM, JIM‐S, and ME performed statistical analyses. RF‐S, IC‐C, GC, JS, JL‐B, JMC, JA, AR, MV, AC, JIM‐S, ME, and ET analyzed the data. GC, AR, MV, AC, JIM‐S, and ET contributed reagents, materials, or analysis tools. RF‐S, IC‐C, GC, AS‐D, JL‐B, JMC, JA, AR, MV, AC, JIM‐S, ME, and ET wrote the paper.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supporting information

Expanded View Figures PDF

Table EV1

Table EV2

Table EV3

Table EV4

Table EV5

Table EV6

Table EV7

Review Process File

Source Data for Figure 7

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to the patients with PD who have participated in this study and to their relatives. We are grateful to Prof. Carlos López‐Otín and to Dr. Ariadna Laguna Tuset for critical reading of this manuscript. We thank Manel Fernández and Cristina Muñoz for excellent technical assistance. We also acknowledge Carla Sureda and Ana Molgosa for helpful assistance with the neuronal differentiation of iPSCs. We are grateful to the Spanish National Genotyping Centre (CeGen, http://www.cegen.org) and to the Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Unit of the Institut de Biologia Molecular de Barcelona (IBMB). Part of this work was developed at the Centre de Recerca Biomèdica Cellex and the Centre Esther Koplowitz, Barcelona, Spain. The study was funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) through the Cooperative Projects program of the Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED) (to E.T., M.V., A.R., J.A. y J.L.‐B.). Additional support was provided by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) grant FIS2010‐21924‐C02‐02 and the Generalitat de Catalunya grant 2009SGR14 (to J.S.), the Fundación Botín (to J.L.‐B.), the SAF program of the Spanish Ministry of Innovation and Science (to J.L.‐B., J.M.C. and J.A.), the Spanish Cell Therapy Network (Red de Terapia Celular) of the ISICIII (to J.M.C.), the SAF2012‐33526 grant and the Cell Therapy Network (TerCel nodes RD12/0019/0019,/0003, and/0033) of the ISCIII (to A.R.), the PIE14/00061 grant of the ISICIII/FEDER (to A.R., R.F.‐S. and M.E.), the FIS project PI10/849 of the ISCIII (to M.V.), the BFU2013‐49157‐P grant, as well as the ERC‐2012‐StG grant of the European Research Council (ERC) (to A.C.), and the Mendelian Forms of Parkinson's Disease grant (MEFOPA) of the EC (to E.T.). R.F.‐S. was supported by a Marie Skłodowska‐Curie contract of the EC and IDIBAPS, and by a Juan de la Cierva contract of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO), I.C.‐C. by a CIBERNED contract, J.I.M.‐S. by a Ramón y Cajal contract of the MINECO, and M.E. by a Miguel Servet contract of the ISCIII.

EMBO Mol Med (2015) 7: 1529–1546

References

  1. Agirre X, Castellano G, Pascual M, Heath S, Kulis M, Segura V, Bergmann A, Esteve A, Merkel A, Raineri E et al (2015) Whole‐epigenome analysis in multiple myeloma reveals DNA hypermethylation of B cell‐specific enhancers. Genome Res 25: 478–487 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ambrosi G, Ghezzi C, Sepe S, Milanese C, Payan‐Gomez C, Bombardieri CR, Armentero MT, Zangaglia R, Pacchetti C, Mastroberardino PG et al (2014) Bioenergetic and proteolytic defects in fibroblasts from patients with sporadic Parkinson's disease. Biochim Biophys Acta 1842: 1385–1394 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Beach TG, Adler CH, Sue LI, Vedders L, Lue L, White Iii CL, Akiyama H, Caviness JN, Shill HA, Sabbagh MN et al (2010) Multi‐organ distribution of phosphorylated alpha‐synuclein histopathology in subjects with Lewy body disorders. Acta Neuropathol 119: 689–702 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Benjamini Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Series B 57: 289–300 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bergman Y, Cedar H (2013) DNA methylation dynamics in health and disease. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20: 274–281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bibikova M, Barnes B, Tsan C, Ho V, Klotzle B, Le JM, Delano D, Zhang L, Schroth GP, Gunderson KL et al (2011) High density DNA methylation array with single CpG site resolution. Genomics 98: 288–295 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. de Boni L, Tierling S, Roeber S, Walter J, Giese A, Kretzschmar HA (2011) Next‐generation sequencing reveals regional differences of the alpha‐synuclein methylation state independent of Lewy body disease. Neuromolecular Med 13: 310–320 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Byers B, Cord B, Nguyen HN, Schule B, Fenno L, Lee PC, Deisseroth K, Langston JW, Pera RR, Palmer TD (2011) SNCA triplication Parkinson's patient's iPSC‐derived DA neurons accumulate alpha‐synuclein and are susceptible to oxidative stress. PLoS ONE 6: e26159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cao X, Yasuda T, Uthayathas S, Watts RL, Mouradian MM, Mochizuki H, Papa SM (2010) Striatal overexpression of DeltaFosB reproduces chronic levodopa‐induced involuntary movements. J Neurosci 30: 7335–7343 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cooper O, Seo H, Andrabi S, Guardia‐Laguarta C, Graziotto J, Sundberg M, McLean JR, Carrillo‐Reid L, Xie Z, Osborn T et al (2012) Pharmacological rescue of mitochondrial deficits in iPSC‐derived neural cells from patients with familial Parkinson's disease. Sci Transl Med 4: 141ra190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Desplats P, Spencer B, Coffee E, Patel P, Michael S, Patrick C, Adame A, Rockenstein E, Masliah E (2011) Alpha‐synuclein sequesters Dnmt1 from the nucleus: a novel mechanism for epigenetic alterations in Lewy body diseases. J Biol Chem 286: 9031–9037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Di Fonzo A, Rohe CF, Ferreira J, Chien HF, Vacca L, Stocchi F, Guedes L, Fabrizio E, Manfredi M, Vanacore N et al (2005) A frequent LRRK2 gene mutation associated with autosomal dominant Parkinson's disease. Lancet 365: 412–415 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Doi A, Park IH, Wen B, Murakami P, Aryee MJ, Irizarry R, Herb B, Ladd‐Acosta C, Rho J, Loewer S et al (2009) Differential methylation of tissue‐ and cancer‐specific CpG island shores distinguishes human induced pluripotent stem cells, embryonic stem cells and fibroblasts. Nat Genet 41: 1350–1353 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Domanskyi A, Alter H, Vogt MA, Gass P, Vinnikov IA (2014) Transcription factors Foxa1 and Foxa2 are required for adult dopamine neurons maintenance. Front Cell Neurosci 8: 275 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dunham I, Kundaje A, Aldred SF, Collins PJ, Davis CA, Doyle F, Epstein CB, Frietze S, Harrow J, Kaul R et al (2012) An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489: 57–74 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ernst J, Kheradpour P, Mikkelsen TS, Shoresh N, Ward LD, Epstein CB, Zhang X, Wang L, Issner R, Coyne M et al (2011) Mapping and analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types. Nature 473: 43–49 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Escott‐Price V, Nalls MA, Morris HR, Lubbe S, Brice A, Gasser T, Heutink P, Wood NW, Hardy J, Singleton AB et al (2015) Polygenic risk of Parkinson disease is correlated with disease age at onset. Ann Neurol 77: 582–591 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Farrer MJ (2006) Genetics of Parkinson disease: paradigm shifts and future prospects. Nat Rev Genet 7: 306–318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Feil R, Fraga MF (2011) Epigenetics and the environment: emerging patterns and implications. Nat Rev Genet 13: 97–109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gerstein MB, Kundaje A, Hariharan M, Landt SG, Yan KK, Cheng C, Mu XJ, Khurana E, Rozowsky J, Alexander R et al (2012) Architecture of the human regulatory network derived from ENCODE data. Nature 489: 91–100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gilks WP, Abou‐Sleiman PM, Gandhi S, Jain S, Singleton A, Lees AJ, Shaw K, Bhatia KP, Bonifati V, Quinn NP et al (2005) A common LRRK2 mutation in idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Lancet 365: 415–416 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Goedert M, Jakes R, Crowther RA, Six J, Lubke U, Vandermeeren M, Cras P, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM (1993) The abnormal phosphorylation of tau protein at Ser‐202 in Alzheimer disease recapitulates phosphorylation during development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 5066–5070 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Healy DG, Falchi M, O'Sullivan SS, Bonifati V, Durr A, Bressman S, Brice A, Aasly J, Zabetian CP, Goldwurm S et al (2008) Phenotype, genotype, and worldwide genetic penetrance of LRRK2‐associated Parkinson's disease: a case‐control study. Lancet Neurol 7: 583–590 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. van Heesbeen HJ, Mesman S, Veenvliet JV, Smidt MP (2013) Epigenetic mechanisms in the development and maintenance of dopaminergic neurons. Development 140: 1159–1169 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hochedlinger K, Plath K (2009) Epigenetic reprogramming and induced pluripotency. Development 136: 509–523 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hoepken HH, Gispert S, Azizov M, Klinkenberg M, Ricciardi F, Kurz A, Morales‐Gordo B, Bonin M, Riess O, Gasser T et al (2008) Parkinson patient fibroblasts show increased alpha‐synuclein expression. Exp Neurol 212: 307–313 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Holmberg J, Perlmann T (2012) Maintaining differentiated cellular identity. Nat Rev Genet 13: 429–439 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hon GC, Rajagopal N, Shen Y, McCleary DF, Yue F, Dang MD, Ren B (2013) Epigenetic memory at embryonic enhancers identified in DNA methylation maps from adult mouse tissues. Nat Genet 45: 1198–1206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. da Huang, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA (2009) Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 4: 44–57 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. IPDGC (2011) A two‐stage meta‐analysis identifies several new loci for Parkinson's disease. PLoS Genet 7: e1002142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Irizarry RA, Hobbs B, Collin F, Beazer‐Barclay YD, Antonellis KJ, Scherf U, Speed TP (2003) Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics 4: 249–264 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jiang H, Ren Y, Yuen EY, Zhong P, Ghaedi M, Hu Z, Azabdaftari G, Nakaso K, Yan Z, Feng J (2012) Parkin controls dopamine utilization in human midbrain dopaminergic neurons derived from induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat Commun 3: 668 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jin H, Kanthasamy A, Harischandra DS, Kondru N, Ghosh A, Panicker N, Anantharam V, Rana A, Kanthasamy AG (2014) Histone hyperacetylation upregulates pkcdelta in dopaminergic neurons to induce cell death: relevance to epigenetic mechanisms of neurodegeneration in Parkinson's disease. J Biol Chem 289: 34743–34767 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Jones PA (2012) Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nat Rev Genet 13: 484–492 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kontopoulos E, Parvin JD, Feany MB (2006) Alpha‐synuclein acts in the nucleus to inhibit histone acetylation and promote neurotoxicity. Hum Mol Genet 15: 3012–3023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kulis M, Heath S, Bibikova M, Queiros AC, Navarro A, Clot G, Martinez‐Trillos A, Castellano G, Brun‐Heath I, Pinyol M et al (2012) Epigenomic analysis detects widespread gene‐body DNA hypomethylation in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Nat Genet 44: 1236–1242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kulis M, Queiros AC, Beekman R, Martin‐Subero JI (2013) Intragenic DNA methylation in transcriptional regulation, normal differentiation and cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta 1829: 1161–1174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Laguna A, Schintu N, Nobre A, Alvarsson A, Volakakis N, Jacobsen JK, Gomez‐Galan M, Sopova E, Joodmardi E, Yoshitake T et al (2015) Dopaminergic control of autophagic‐lysosomal function implicates Lmx1b in Parkinson's disease. Nat Neurosci 18: 826–835 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lahti L, Saarimaki‐Vire J, Rita H, Partanen J (2011) FGF signaling gradient maintains symmetrical proliferative divisions of midbrain neuronal progenitors. Dev Biol 349: 270–282 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lahti L, Peltopuro P, Piepponen TP, Partanen J (2012) Cell‐autonomous FGF signaling regulates anteroposterior patterning and neuronal differentiation in the mesodiencephalic dopaminergic progenitor domain. Development 139: 894–905 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Lang AE, Lozano AM (1998a) Parkinson's disease. First of two parts. N Engl J Med 339: 1044–1053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lang AE, Lozano AM (1998b) Parkinson's disease. Second of two parts. N Engl J Med 339: 1130–1143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Lee ST, Xiao Y, Muench MO, Xiao J, Fomin ME, Wiencke JK, Zheng S, Dou X, de Smith A, Chokkalingam A et al (2012) A global DNA methylation and gene expression analysis of early human B‐cell development reveals a demethylation signature and transcription factor network. Nucleic Acids Res 40: 11339–11351 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lesage S, Durr A, Tazir M, Lohmann E, Leutenegger AL, Janin S, Pollak P, Brice A (2006) LRRK2 G2019S as a cause of Parkinson's disease in North African Arabs. N Engl J Med 354: 422–423 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lindvall O, Bjorklund A (2011) Cell therapeutics in Parkinson's disease. Neurotherapeutics 8: 539–548 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Masliah E, Dumaop W, Galasko D, Desplats P (2013) Distinctive patterns of DNA methylation associated with Parkinson disease: identification of concordant epigenetic changes in brain and peripheral blood leukocytes. Epigenetics 8: 1030–1038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Morizane A, Doi D, Kikuchi T, Okita K, Hotta A, Kawasaki T, Hayashi T, Onoe H, Shiina T, Yamanaka S et al (2013) Direct comparison of autologous and allogenic transplantation of iPSC derived neural cells in the brain of a nonhuman primate. Stem Cell Rep 1: 283–292 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Nalls MA, Pankratz N, Lill CM, Do CB, Hernandez DG, Saad M, DeStefano AL, Kara E, Bras J, Sharma M et al (2014) Large‐scale meta‐analysis of genome‐wide association data identifies six new risk loci for Parkinson's disease. Nat Genet 46: 989–993 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Nguyen HN, Byers B, Cord B, Shcheglovitov A, Byrne J, Gujar P, Kee K, Schule B, Dolmetsch RE, Langston W et al (2011) LRRK2 mutant iPSC‐derived DA neurons demonstrate increased susceptibility to oxidative stress. Cell Stem Cell 8: 267–280 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Nikolaev A, McLaughlin T, O'Leary DD, Tessier‐Lavigne M (2009) APP binds DR6 to trigger axon pruning and neuron death via distinct caspases. Nature 457: 981–989 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  51. Orenstein SJ, Kuo SH, Tasset I, Arias E, Koga H, Fernandez‐Carasa I, Cortes E, Honig LS, Dauer W, Consiglio A et al (2013) Interplay of LRRK2 with chaperone‐mediated autophagy. Nat Neurosci 16: 394–406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Ozelius LJ, Senthil G, Saunders‐Pullman R, Ohmann E, Deligtisch A, Tagliati M, Hunt AL, Klein C, Henick B, Hailpern SM et al (2006) LRRK2 G2019S as a cause of Parkinson's disease in Ashkenazi Jews. N Engl J Med 354: 424–425 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Paisan‐Ruiz C, Jain S, Evans EW, Gilks WP, Simon J, van der Brug M, Lopez de Munain A, Aparicio S, Gil AM, Khan N et al (2004) Cloning of the gene containing mutations that cause PARK8‐linked Parkinson's disease. Neuron 44: 595–600 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Papkovskaia TD, Chau KY, Inesta‐Vaquera F, Papkovsky DB, Healy DG, Nishio K, Staddon J, Duchen MR, Hardy J, Schapira AH et al (2012) G2019S leucine‐rich repeat kinase 2 causes uncoupling protein‐mediated mitochondrial depolarization. Hum Mol Genet 21: 4201–4213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Pieper HC, Evert BO, Kaut O, Riederer PF, Waha A, Wullner U (2008) Different methylation of the TNF‐alpha promoter in cortex and substantia nigra: implications for selective neuronal vulnerability. Neurobiol Dis 32: 521–527 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Potashkin JA, Santiago JA, Ravina BM, Watts A, Leontovich AA (2012) Biosignatures for Parkinson's disease and atypical parkinsonian disorders patients. PLoS ONE 7: e43595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Rakovic A, Shurkewitsch K, Seibler P, Grunewald A, Zanon A, Hagenah J, Krainc D, Klein C (2013) Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)‐induced putative kinase 1 (PINK1)‐dependent ubiquitination of endogenous Parkin attenuates mitophagy: study in human primary fibroblasts and induced pluripotent stem cell‐derived neurons. J Biol Chem 288: 2223–2237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Reinhardt P, Schmid B, Burbulla LF, Schondorf DC, Wagner L, Glatza M, Hoing S, Hargus G, Heck SA, Dhingra A et al (2013) Genetic correction of a LRRK2 mutation in human iPSCs links parkinsonian neurodegeneration to ERK‐dependent changes in gene expression. Cell Stem Cell 12: 354–367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Ros‐Bernal F, Hunot S, Herrero MT, Parnadeau S, Corvol JC, Lu L, Alvarez‐Fischer D, Carrillo‐de Sauvage MA, Saurini F, Coussieu C et al (2011) Microglial glucocorticoid receptors play a pivotal role in regulating dopaminergic neurodegeneration in parkinsonism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 6632–6637 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Ryan SD, Dolatabadi N, Chan SF, Zhang X, Akhtar MW, Parker J, Soldner F, Sunico CR, Nagar S, Talantova M et al (2013) Isogenic human iPSC Parkinson's model shows nitrosative stress‐induced dysfunction in MEF2‐PGC1alpha transcription. Cell 155: 1351–1364 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Sanchez‐Danes A, Consiglio A, Richaud Y, Rodriguez‐Piza I, Dehay B, Edel M, Bove J, Memo M, Vila M, Raya A et al (2012a) Efficient generation of A9 midbrain dopaminergic neurons by lentiviral delivery of LMX1A in human embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells. Hum Gene Ther 23: 56–69 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Sanchez‐Danes A, Richaud‐Patin Y, Carballo‐Carbajal I, Jimenez‐Delgado S, Caig C, Mora S, Di Guglielmo C, Ezquerra M, Patel B, Giralt A et al (2012b) Disease‐specific phenotypes in dopamine neurons from human iPS‐based models of genetic and sporadic Parkinson's disease. EMBO Mol Med 4: 380–395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Santiago JA, Potashkin JA (2015) Network‐based metaanalysis identifies HNF4A and PTBP1 as longitudinally dynamic biomarkers for Parkinson's disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112: 2257–2262 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Schafer DP, Stevens B (2010) Synapse elimination during development and disease: immune molecules take centre stage. Biochem Soc Trans 38: 476–481 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Schondorf DC, Aureli M, McAllister FE, Hindley CJ, Mayer F, Schmid B, Sardi SP, Valsecchi M, Hoffmann S, Schwarz LK et al (2014) iPSC‐derived neurons from GBA1‐associated Parkinson's disease patients show autophagic defects and impaired calcium homeostasis. Nat Commun 5: 4028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Seibler P, Graziotto J, Jeong H, Simunovic F, Klein C, Krainc D (2011) Mitochondrial Parkin recruitment is impaired in neurons derived from mutant PINK1 induced pluripotent stem cells. J Neurosci 31: 5970–5976 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Shannon KM, Keshavarzian A, Mutlu E, Dodiya HB, Daian D, Jaglin JA, Kordower JH (2012) Alpha‐synuclein in colonic submucosa in early untreated Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 27: 709–715 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Smyth GK (2004) Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 3: Article3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Stadler MB, Murr R, Burger L, Ivanek R, Lienert F, Scholer A, van Nimwegen E, Wirbelauer C, Oakeley EJ, Gaidatzis D et al (2011) DNA‐binding factors shape the mouse methylome at distal regulatory regions. Nature 480: 490–495 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Stott SR, Metzakopian E, Lin W, Kaestner KH, Hen R, Ang SL (2013) Foxa1 and foxa2 are required for the maintenance of dopaminergic properties in ventral midbrain neurons at late embryonic stages. J Neurosci 33: 8022–8034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Urdinguio RG, Sanchez‐Mut JV, Esteller M (2009) Epigenetic mechanisms in neurological diseases: genes, syndromes, and therapies. Lancet Neurol 8: 1056–1072 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Xie M, Hong C, Zhang B, Lowdon RF, Xing X, Li D, Zhou X, Lee HJ, Maire CL, Ligon KL et al (2013) DNA hypomethylation within specific transposable element families associates with tissue‐specific enhancer landscape. Nat Genet 45: 836–841 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Yakhine‐Diop SM, Bravo‐San Pedro JM, Gomez‐Sanchez R, Pizarro‐Estrella E, Rodriguez‐Arribas M, Climent V, Aiastui A, Lopez de Munain A, Fuentes JM, Gonzalez‐Polo RA (2014) G2019S LRRK2 mutant fibroblasts from Parkinson's disease patients show increased sensitivity to neurotoxin 1‐methyl‐4‐phenylpyridinium dependent of autophagy. Toxicology 324: 1–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Zhu H, Lensch MW, Cahan P, Daley GQ (2011) Investigating monogenic and complex diseases with pluripotent stem cells. Nat Rev Genet 12: 266–275 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Ziller MJ, Gu H, Muller F, Donaghey J, Tsai LT, Kohlbacher O, De Jager PL, Rosen ED, Bennett DA, Bernstein BE et al (2013) Charting a dynamic DNA methylation landscape of the human genome. Nature 500: 477–481 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Zimprich A, Biskup S, Leitner P, Lichtner P, Farrer M, Lincoln S, Kachergus J, Hulihan M, Uitti RJ, Calne DB et al (2004) Mutations in LRRK2 cause autosomal‐dominant Parkinsonism with pleomorphic pathology. Neuron 44: 601–607 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Expanded View Figures PDF

Table EV1

Table EV2

Table EV3

Table EV4

Table EV5

Table EV6

Table EV7

Review Process File

Source Data for Figure 7


Articles from EMBO Molecular Medicine are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES