Abstract
Bcl-2 inhibits apoptosis by two distinct mechanisms but only one is targeted to treat Bcl-2-positive malignancies. In this mechanism, the BH1-3 domains of Bcl-2 form a hydrophobic pocket, binding and inhibiting pro-apoptotic proteins, including Bim. In the other mechanism, the BH4 domain mediates interaction of Bcl-2 with inositol 1,4, 5-trisphosphate receptors (IP3Rs), inhibiting pro-apoptotic Ca2+ signals. The current anti-Bcl-2 agents, ABT-263 (Navitoclax) and ABT-199 (Venetoclax), induce apoptosis by displacing pro-apoptotic proteins from the hydrophobic pocket, but do not inhibit Bcl-2-IP3R interaction. Therefore, to target this interaction we developed BIRD-2 (Bcl-2 IP3 Receptor Disruptor-2), a decoy peptide that binds to the BH4 domain, blocking Bcl-2-IP3R interaction and thus inducing Ca2+-mediated apoptosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, multiple myeloma, and follicular lymphoma cells, including cells resistant to ABT-263, ABT-199, or the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor Ibrutinib. Moreover, combining BIRD-2 with ABT-263 or ABT-199 enhances apoptosis induction compared to single agent treatment. Overall, these findings provide strong rationale for developing novel therapeutic agents that mimic the action of BIRD-2 in targeting the BH4 domain of Bcl-2 and disrupting Bcl-2-IP3R interaction.
Keywords: Bcl-2; inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor; ABT-199; Bruton’s tyrosine kinase; lymphoid malignancy
INTRODUCTION
The Bcl-2 protein is elevated in a variety of types of cancer, including those derived by malignant transformation of B-lymphocytes: chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and multiple myeloma (MM) [1]. Bcl-2 elevation contributes to apoptosis resistance in malignant cells, a hallmark of cancer that represents a major hurdle in cancer treatment [2]. Bcl-2 is the founding member of a large family of apoptosis regulating proteins composed of one or more Bcl-2 homology (BH) domains [3, 4]. Bcl-2 has four BH domains (BH1-4), typical of most anti-apoptotic family members, while pro-apoptotic family members lack the BH4 domain and have only BH1-3 domains (e.g., Bax, Bak). Another subset of pro-apoptotic family members has only a BH3 domain (e.g., Bim). These BH3-only proteins act as sentinels of cell stress that activate Bax or Bak, which in turn trigger apoptosis by permeabilizing the outer mitochondrial membrane and releasing cytochrome c. Bcl-2 binds these pro-apoptotic BH3-only family members, thereby inhibiting apoptosis.
A major advance in cancer treatment is the development of the BH3 mimetic agents ABT-737, its orally bioavailable analog ABT-263 (Navitoclax), and ABT-199 (Venetoclax) [5, 6]. These small molecules competitively inhibit BH3-only protein binding by Bcl-2, inducing apoptosis in cells addicted to Bcl-2 elevation for survival [7]. The most recent, ABT-199, selectively targets Bcl-2 and shows considerable promise for treatment of a wide range of Bcl-2-positive malignancies [6–9].
But interaction of Bcl-2 with BH3-only proteins is not the only way Bcl-2 represses apoptosis. Bcl-2 also binds to the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors (IP3Rs), Ca2+ channels located on the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), preventing high amplitude intracellular Ca2+ elevations that trigger cell death [10, 11]. Bcl-2 accomplishes this by docking the Ca2+-activated protein phosphatase calcineurin and the calcineurin-regulated inhibitor of protein phosphatase 1, DARPP-32, to IP3Rs. This complex forms a negative feedback loop that senses excessive Ca2+ release and rapidly decreases IP3R phosphorylation, thereby decreasing IP3R-mediated Ca2+ release and thus preventing apoptosis [12].
Distinct regions of the Bcl-2 protein govern these disparate mechanisms of apoptosis regulation. BH domains 1-3 participate in forming a hydrophobic pocket in which pro-apoptotic proteins are bound [3]. The BH3 mimetic agents induce apoptosis by binding in this pocket and displacing pro-apoptotic proteins [4]. On the other hand, the BH4 domain of Bcl-2 mediates the binding of Bcl-2 to IP3Rs [13, 14].
Currently there is no therapeutic agent designed to target the BH4 domain of Bcl-2. Therefore, to selectively target Bcl-2-IP3R interaction, we developed a synthetic peptide corresponding to the IP3R binding site for Bcl-2 [15]. This peptide disrupts Bcl-2-IP3R interaction, reversing Bcl-2′s inhibition of IP3-induced Ca2+ elevation and decreasing cell survival, without disturbing the binding of pro-apoptotic proteins by Bcl-2 [13, 15]. Elimination of a potential protease cleavage site produced a more potent version of this peptide capable of inducing Ca2+-mediated apoptosis in primary human CLL cells (but not in normal human lymphocytes) [16] and in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cell lines [17]. Here we call this peptide BIRD-2 (Bcl-2-IP3R Disruptor-2). BIRD-2 binds directly to the BH4 domain of Bcl-2, functioning as a decoy peptide to competitively inhibit Bcl-2 interaction with IP3Rs, reversing Bcl-2′s control over IP3R-mediated Ca2+ release and thereby inducing high amplitude intracellular Ca2+ elevations that trigger apoptosis [14, 16].
Knowledge that Bcl-2 inhibits apoptosis by two distinct validated pathways involving separate regions of the Bcl-2 protein suggests that targeting the BH4 domain of Bcl-2 should be undertaken as a novel therapeutic strategy. But whether or not this approach might represent a potential therapeutic gain in view of the already established approach to targeting Bcl-2 with BH3 mimetic agents has not been tested. Therefore, the present work was undertaken in which we employ a series of human myeloma cell lines (HMCLs) to compare responses to BIRD-2 and ABT-263/ABT-199. The findings indicate for the first time that BIRD-2 induces apoptosis both in vitro and in vivo. Also, we find that treatment of HMCLs with BIRD-2 together with ABT-263/ABT-199 enhances cell killing. This combined activity extends to FL cells as well. Moreover, we demonstrate that BIRD-2 induces apoptosis in HMCLs resistant to both ABT-263/ABT-199 and to the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (Btk) inhibitor Ibrutinib. Overall, the findings of the present report provide strong rationale for developing novel therapeutic agents that mimic the action of BIRD-2 in targeting the BH4 domain of Bcl-2.
RESULTS
BIRD-2 activity in vitro and in vivo in HMCLs
An MTS assay was used to compare the BIRD-2 sensitivity of primary human CLL cells with cell lines representing various other lymphoid malignancies and transformed lines of non-malignant derivation in relation to sensitivity to BIRD-2ctrl, a control peptide derived from BIRD-2 sequence. The MTS assay determines NAD(P)H-dependent cellular oxidoreductase activity as a measure of cell viability. Cell lines corresponding to B-cell lymphoid malignancies, including MM and B-cell lymphoma, were generally more sensitive to BIRD-2 than lines corresponding to T-cell malignancies and non-malignant cell lines (Figure 1A). The six HMCLs demonstrate a range of sensitivities to BIRD-2, as observed with primary human CLL cells (Figure 1A). Dose responses for the two most sensitive HMCLs, NCI-H929 and JJN-3, and the two least sensitive HMCLs, KMS-12-BM and RPMI-8226, are shown in Figure 1B and Figure 1C, respectively.
The differential sensitivity of NCI-H929 and KMS-12-BM cells to 10 μM BIRD-2 treatment for 24 hours, as measured by MTS assay (Figure 2A, 2B), is substantiated by quantifying the percentage of apoptotic nuclei developing after BIRD-2 treatment (Figure 2C, 2D). The BIRD-2-mediated decline in survival is accompanied by a larger dose-dependent increase in the percentage of NCI-H929 cells exhibiting apoptotic nuclear chromatin condensation than observed in KMS-12-BM cells. The findings indicate that KMS-12-BM cells are not completely resistant to BIRD-2, but require a much higher concentration of BIRD-2 than NCI-H929 cells to achieve a similar degree of apoptosis. In addition, we find that BIRD-2 treatment also induces PARP cleavage and caspase-3 activation in NCI-H929 cells, providing further evidence of apoptosis induction by BIRD-2 (Figure 2E). Consistent with these findings, treatment of NCI-H929 cells with BIRD-2 causes activation and oligomerization of the mitochondrial membrane-localized pro-apoptotic protein Bax, which permeabilizes the mitochondrial outer membrane during apoptosis initiation. This finding is evident in cells treated with BIRD-2 or the positive control staurosporine by the formation of perinuclear puncta detected with the Bax 6A7 antibody, which specifically recognizes the conformationally active form of Bax (Figure 3A). Moreover, pretreatment with the caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK protects NCI-H929 cells from BIRD-2-induced formation of apoptotic nuclei (Figure 3B) and cell death measured by the CellTiter-Glo (CTG) assay, which quantifies ATP levels as a measure of cell viability (Figure 3C). These findings indicate that the cell death induced by BIRD-2 is primarily caspase-dependent.
To examine the anti-tumor effect of BIRD-2 on HMCLs in vivo, NCI-H929 cells were inoculated subcutaneously into the flank regions of nude mice. Once tumors had become visible, tumor-bearing mice were injected with either BIRD-2 or saline at the site of tumors. Administration of 10 mg/kg BIRD-2 every 2-3 days for a total of four injections caused a significant reduction in tumor growth rate compared to the control group (Figure 4A, 4B). Furthermore, injection of BIRD-2 inhibited end-point tumor weight to less than 50% compared to the control group (Figure 4C). Notably, there was not a significant difference in body weight between the two treatment groups, suggesting that BIRD-2 injection does not cause apparent toxicity in mice (Figure 4D). Together, these findings indicate that percutaneous injection of BIRD-2 penetrates tissue through diffusion and inhibits tumor growth without inducing immediate recognizable toxicity in mice and provide evidence of in vivo single-agent activity of targeting Bcl-2′s BH4 domain.
Reciprocal sensitivity of HMCLs to BIRD-2 and BH3 mimetic agents
The sensitivities of HMCLs to BIRD-2 and ABT-263 or ABT-199 were compared using the CTG assay (Figure 5). The marked difference in BIRD-2 sensitivity of NCI-H929 and JJN-3 versus KMS-12-BM and RPMI-8226 cells using the MTS assay in Figure 1 and the apoptotic nuclear chromatin condensation assay in Figure 2 was confirmed using the CTG assay (Figure 5A). ABT-263 induced an appreciable degree of cell death in only two of the HMCLs, KMS-12-BM and RPMI-8226, while ABT-199 induced a comparable degree of cell death only in KMS-12-BM cells (Figure 5B, 5C). By comparison, all HMCLs exhibited considerable resistance to the Btk inhibitor Ibrutinib (Figure 5D). These findings indicate that BIRD-2 is capable of inducing death in HMCLs that are resistant to both the BH3 mimetic agents ABT-263 and ABT-199 and to the Btk inhibitor Ibrutinib. Moreover, the findings suggest a reciprocal sensitivity of HMCLs to BIRD-2 versus ABT-263/199, consistent with the different mechanisms of action of these agents.
The Bcl-2 family protein Bim is a key mediator of apoptosis in lymphoid malignancies [18, 19]. As a BH3-only protein, Bim levels contribute to differential sensitivity of cells to BH3 mimetic agents by priming Bcl-2-positive cells for death [20]. Therefore, in order to explore differences in sensitivity of the HMCLs to BH3 mimetic agents, we compared expression levels of Bim in these cells. We find that Bim protein is expressed highly in the BH3 mimetic-sensitive HMCLs, whereas Bim expression is low in the BH3 mimetic agent-resistant NCI-H929 and JJN-3 lines (Figure 6A). By comparison, Bcl-2 and Mcl-1 are expressed at varying levels (Figure 6A).
Moreover, we observe that in highly BIRD-2-sensitive NCI-H929 cells, BIRD-2 induces elevation of Bim protein and mRNA, while Bcl-2 mRNA and protein levels are essentially unchanged (Figure 6B, 6C). On the other hand, in KMS-12-BM cells, basal Bim levels are already high and change little following BIRD-2 treatment (Figure 6D). As shown in earlier work, disruption of Bcl-2-IP3R interaction by BIRD-2 induces IP3R-mediated Ca2+ elevation [12, 15–17] (Figure 6E, left). Adding the Ca2+ chelators EGTA and BAPTA-AM to cells prior to BIRD-2 treatment inhibits BIRD-2-mediated Ca2+ elevation (Figure 6E, right) and Bim elevation (Figure 6F), and prevents BIRD-2-induced formation of apoptotic nuclei and loss of cell viability (Figure 6G, 6H). Therefore, BIRD-2-induced Bim elevation in NCI-H929 cells is Ca2+-mediated, consistent with earlier evidence of a role for Ca2+-induced transcriptional elevation of Bim in lymphocyte cell death [21]. Moreover, these findings demonstrate that the cell death induced by BIRD-2 is largely Ca2+-dependent.
Combining BIRD-2 with BH3 mimetic agents
The observation that BIRD-2 treatment elevates Bim mRNA and protein without elevating Bcl-2 raises the possibility that BIRD-2 may sensitize HMCLs to BH3 mimetic agents by increasing the ratio of Bim to Bcl-2. Therefore, we treated HMCLs with BIRD-2 in conjunction with BH3 mimetic agents. In ABT-263-sensitive RPMI-8226 cells, dual treatment with BIRD-2 and ABT-263 enhanced cell death induction compared to either agent alone (Figure 7A). Moreover, co-treatment with BIRD-2 and ABT-263 also enhanced cell death induction in ABT-263/ABT-199-resistant cells as shown for NCI-H929 cells in Figure 7B. This effect was observed most notably at concentrations of BIRD-2 and ABT-263 that caused little single agent cell death (Figure 7B). To test the potential of combining BIRD-2 with ABT-199, highly ABT-199-sensitive KMS-12-PE cells (ABT-199 EC50 60 nM) and highly ABT-199-resistant U266 cells (ABT-199 EC50 > 40 μM) were treated with both agents. Combined treatment with BIRD-2 and ABT-199 augmented cell death induction in both KMS-12-PE and U266 HMCLs compared to single agent treatment (Figure 7C, 7D). These findings indicate that dual treatment with BIRD-2 and ABT-263 or ABT-199 enhances cell death induction in a range of HMCLs exhibiting both sensitivity and resistance to BH3 mimetic agents.
A similar approach was taken in the WSU-FSCCL human FL cell line, which exhibits the characteristic t(14;18) chromosomal translocation responsible for elevated Bcl-2 expression in FL [22] (Figure 8). As in HMCLs, cytotoxicity (Figure 8A) and apoptosis (Figure 8B, 8C) are increased when BIRD-2 and ABT-199 are combined, providing evidence that BIRD-2 functions together with BH3 mimetic agents in other Bcl-2-positive malignancies in addition to MM.
DISCUSSION
Bcl-2 inhibits apoptosis by two disparate mechanisms [10, 11] (Figure 9). On the one hand, Bcl-2 binds BH3-only pro-apoptotic proteins and prevents them from inducing apoptosis; BH3 mimetic agents, such as ABT-263 and ABT-199, inhibit this mechanism. On the other hand, Bcl-2 binds IP3Rs and prevents Ca2+ elevation capable of inducing apoptosis (Figure 9). This mechanism and its inhibition by BIRD-2 are summarized elsewhere [10]. Here we extend our earlier work indicating that BIRD-2 induces apoptosis in primary human CLL cells [16] by showing for the first time that BIRD-2 also induces apoptosis in MM and FL cells. Moreover, we demonstrate that BIRD-2 treatment induces Bax activation and cell death that is in large part Ca2+- and caspase-dependent. Perhaps even more importantly, the present work indicates that BIRD-2 induces apoptosis in MM cells insensitive to ABT-263, ABT-199, and/or Ibrutinib.
The resistance of certain HMCLs to ABT-263 and ABT-199 in the present study is not surprising, as work by other investigators indicates that only a subset of HMCLs are sensitive to BH3 mimetic agents [23, 24]. The observation that BIRD-2 kills BH3 mimetic agent-resistant HMCLs is fully consistent with the dual mechanisms of Bcl-2 action illustrated in Figure 9 and provides strong rationale for developing therapeutic agents that mimic the action of BIRD-2. Moreover, these findings indicate that two separate types of addiction to Bcl-2 exist among malignant cells: one dependent on Bcl-2′s BH1-3 domain for binding and sequestering of pro-apoptotic BH3-only proteins (vulnerable to BH3 mimetic agents) [7, 8], and the other dependent on Bcl-2′s BH4 domain for binding IP3Rs and inhibiting pro-apoptotic Ca2+ elevations (vulnerable to BIRD-2). Therefore, fully understanding and targeting the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2-IP3R interaction in addition to Bcl-2-BH3-only protein interaction should enable more complete interference with Bcl-2, a critical defense mechanism of malignant cells against apoptosis.
Because Bcl-2′s dual anti-apoptotic mechanisms are so different from each other, it theoretically should be possible to achieve a better therapeutic action by combining agents targeting each of the mechanisms. Indeed, the findings of the present work suggest that combinations of BIRD-2 and either ABT-263 or ABT-199 induce more cell death than either agent alone, in both HMCLs and in t(14;18)-positive FL cells. Moreover, the observation that BIRD-2 treatment elevates Bim without elevating Bcl-2 suggests that BIRD-2 may sensitize cells to BH3 mimetic agents. The BH3-only protein Bim is already known to play an important role in mediating apoptosis of malignant lymphocytes [20, 25–28]. Furthermore, when basal Bim levels are elevated, malignant cells can become addicted to Bcl-2 for its ability to bind Bim and prevent it from inducing apoptosis [7, 8]. BH3 mimetic agents induce apoptosis by displacing Bim from Bcl-2 [7, 8]. Cells with high levels of both Bcl-2 and Bim are primed for cell death induction by BH3 mimetic agents. Consistent with this, HMCLs found in the present work to be killed by ABT-263 or ABT-199 have high levels of Bim, whereas the HMCLs resistant to BH3 mimetic agents have low levels of Bim. Combining BIRD-2 with ABT-263 or ABT-199 may be particularly advantageous, we propose, since BIRD-2 treatment elevates cytoplasmic Ca2+, which in turn elevates Bim levels. In short, certain HMCLs are primed to respond to BH3 mimetic agents because they contain a high concentration of BH3-only proteins like Bim that are sequestered by highly expressed Bcl-2. In HMCLs with relatively low basal levels of Bim, there are too few BH3-only proteins to be released from Bcl-2 and mediate cell death in response to BH3 mimetic agents unless they are also treated with BIRD-2, which elevates Bim levels, thus priming the cells for sensitivity to BH3 mimetic agents.
By interacting with IP3Rs, we posit that Bcl-2 regulates a key pro-survival signaling pathway in many B-cell malignancies, driven by elevated expression and/or activity of Btk. Btk phosphorylates and thereby activates phospholipase C gamma (PLCγ), leading to protein kinase C (PKC) activation through the generation of diacylglycerol (DAG) [29]. Novel therapeutic agents that inhibit Btk, such as Ibrutinib, inhibit survival pathways including PI3K/AKT and the PKC-mediated MAPK and NFκB pathways, decreasing the proliferation and survival of B-cell malignancies [30–32]. Ibrutinib has recently been approved for use in B-cell malignancies CLL and mantle cell lymphoma, is currently in phase II clinical trials for use in MM [33, 34], and is rapidly becoming one of the most effective targeted agents for B-cell malignancies [35]. However, Ibrutinib resistance is emerging [36, 37], which results most often from Ibrutinib binding site mutations in Btk or gain-of-function mutations in PLCγ [38–40], both of which lead to increased signaling flux through PLCγ. Importantly, since PLCγ produces IP3 concurrently with DAG, a consequence of Ibrutinib resistance is likely to be increased IP3 generation, with the expected result being increased IP3R-dependent Ca2+ elevation, were it not for the inhibitory presence of Bcl-2 on IP3Rs. Therefore, we anticipate that BIRD-2 might overcome Ibrutinib resistance by displacing Bcl-2 from IP3Rs and inducing Ca2+ elevation and apoptosis downstream of hyperactive PLCγ. Although this hypothesis has not been formally tested, our observation that BIRD-2 robustly induces apoptosis in NCI-H929 and JJN-3 cells, two HMCLs resistant to Ibrutinib, is consistent with the concept that BIRD-2 may be effective in some situations where Ibrutinib is not. These findings are intriguing since both Btk and Bcl-2 are highly expressed in B-cell malignancies, including MM [1, 33, 35–41].
Similar to our findings using BIRD-2 in combination with ABT-263/ABT-199, we observed that co-treatment of HMCLs with BIRD-2 and Ibrutinib enhanced cell killing, most notably when treated continuously with Ibrutinib at concentrations greater than 1 μM (data not shown). We additionally tested a more stringent Ibrutinib dosing schedule comprised of short-term treatment (2 hours) with low dose Ibrutinib (1 μM) followed by Ibrutinib washout and addition of BIRD-2. Under these conditions, there was no enhancement of cell killing by dual treatment with Ibrutinib and BIRD-2 compared to BIRD-2 treatment alone (data not shown). Given that Ibrutinib potently and irreversibly inhibits Btk at concentrations well below 1 μM [42] and that clinical Ibrutinib dosing schedules in patients result in full occupancy of the Btk binding site by Ibrutinib for at least 24 hours post-treatment [43], the more stringent Ibrutinib dosing schedule would be expected to completely inhibit Btk throughout the experiment period at a dose of 1 μM. Taken together, these results suggest that the enhancement of cell killing observed following co-treatment of HMCLs with BIRD-2 and Ibrutinib at Ibrutinib concentrations above 1 μM may be due to effects of Ibrutinib on targets other than Btk. Intriguingly, Ibrutinib is known to inhibit a variety of kinases in addition to Btk [42, 44, 45], indicating that BIRD-2 may be effective in combination with inhibitors of kinases other than Btk.
We initially employed HMCLs in the present work as a tool for investigating Bcl-2′s dual anti-apoptotic mechanisms and the effects of targeting these mechanisms with either BIRD-2 or BH3 mimetic agents alone, or in combination. At the same time, our findings provide rationale for treating MM and also FL with agents that target Bcl-2-IP3R interaction, alone or in combination with BH3 mimetic agents. Success in this regard should have a major impact, since both MM and FL remain challenging, incurable malignancies despite a number of recent therapeutic advances [46–48]. Bcl-2 is expressed in MM cells at levels comparable to FL, even though MM cells lack the t(14;18) translocation responsible for elevating Bcl-2 in FL cells [41]. In some but not all HMCLs and primary patient samples the BH3 mimetic ABT-737 induces apoptosis as a single agent and also demonstrates synergistic activity with various chemotherapeutic agents [49–51]. Recent studies also indicate responsiveness of a small subset of HMCLs and primary patient samples to the Bcl-2 selective BH3 mimetic agent ABT-199 [23]. However, ABT resistance is present in more than half of primary MM samples treated with ABT-737 and ABT-199 [23, 52]. Here we find that BIRD-2 induces apoptosis in HMCLs resistant to BH3 mimetic agents ABT-263 and ABT-199 and to the Btk inhibitor Ibrutinib; moreover, one of the BIRD-2-sensitive lines, NCI-H929, corresponds to a MM subgroup that is not only resistant to BH3 mimetic agents but also belongs to a poor prognosis MM category associated with a t(4;14) chromosomal translocation [24]. Therefore, the findings of the present study offer hope that developing therapeutic agents that mimic the action of BIRD-2 will have a major effect in treating MM, either as single agents or in combination with BH3 mimetic agents.
Since discovering that Bcl-2 interacts with IP3Rs to regulate IP3-mediated Ca2+ elevation in lymphoma cells [53], our intention has been to target this interaction for cancer treatment. Broad interest in the role of IP3Rs and Ca2+ signaling in cancer has emerged, including added evidence that cancer cells remodel Ca2+ signaling through IP3Rs to promote migration, tissue invasion, proliferation and survival [54, 55]. Moreover, certain cancers are associated with the up- or down-regulation of specific Ca2+ channels or pumps, leading to the proposal that because Ca2+ channels, pumps and exchangers are modulated by pharmacological agents, they may be targeted for cancer treatment [56]. Also, recent reports indicate that levels of particular IP3R isoforms may serve as potential biomarkers of prognosis or therapeutic response in hematologic malignancies [17, 57].
In conclusion, the findings reported here provide an impetus for targeting Bcl-2-IP3R interaction with drugs that mimic the action of BIRD-2. We anticipate that this novel therapeutic strategy will be most effective when combined with ABT-263 or ABT-199, thus inhibiting both of Bcl-2′s anti-apoptotic mechanisms.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell culture
Human leukemia, lymphoma, and MM cell lines were cultured in RPMI-1640 media with 10% FBS. Murine fibroblast 3T3 cells and human embryonic kidney HEK293T cells were cultured in DMEM media with 10% FBS. Each medium was supplemented with 100 μM nonessential amino acids, 2 mM L-glutamine, and in MM lines 1 mM sodium pyruvate. Primary human chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells were isolated from peripheral blood of adult patients with CLL as previously described [16]. The use of de-identified human subject samples was approved by the institutional review board of Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine.
Reagents
Hoechst 33342 and Fura-2-AM were purchased from Life Technologies. Z-VAD-FMK was purchased from BIOMOL. ABT-263, ABT-199, and Ibrutinib (all from Selleck) were prepared in DMSO. Peptides were synthesized by GenScript and were prepared in water. BIRD-2 was initially described and referred to as TAT-IDPDD/AA [16] and has the following sequence: RKKRRQRRRGGNVYTEIKCNSLLPLAAIVRV. Two control peptides, neither of which had any detectable activity, nor any differences in effects, were used interchangeably in this study. One is a scrambled form of BIRD-2 that has been referred to previously [16] with sequence: RKKRRQRRRGGDLNEVTCSLIVDRINPVKLY. The other has sequence identical to BIRD-2 except for point mutations designed to inhibit function: RKKRRQRRRGGNVYTEGKCNSGGPLAAIGRV. Peptides were purified by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry to more than 95% purity, and were quantified by amino acid analysis.
MTS assay
Cell viability was measured using the MTS assay using the Cell Proliferation Kit (Promega). Adherent cells were plated at 5,000/well in 96-well cell culture plates and incubated overnight before use. Non-adherent cells (leukemia, lymphoma, and myeloma cell lines and primary CLL cells) were suspended at 2 × 105/ml in culture media. All cells were treated with synthetic peptides for time periods indicated in the text, followed by addition of 20 μL MTS reagent to 100 μL cell culture media and incubation for four hours before cell lysis by 1% SDS. Absorbance at 490 nm was measured using a VICTOR3 microplate reader (Perkin Elmer). The percentage of viable cells was determined by comparing the absorbance in drug-treated cells to the absorbance in vehicle-treated cells.
CellTiter-Glo assay
Cells were added to 96-well plates and treated as above with the concentrations of drugs indicated in the text. After 24 hours, CTG assay reagent (Promega) was diluted 5-fold in PBS, and 80 μL of the diluted reagent was added to each well. Plates were agitated for 2 min and then incubated at rest for 10 min. Total luminescence of each well, corresponding to ATP content, was recorded using a VICTOR3 microplate reader (Perkin Elmer).
Hoechst staining to detect apoptotic nuclei
MM: Cells were plated at 2 × 106/mL and treated with vehicle (water), BIRD-2ctrl, or BIRD-2 at the indicated concentrations for the time periods indicated in the figure legends. FL: Cells were treated with ABT-199, BIRD-2 or ABT-199+BIRD-2 or no treatment at the indicated concentrations for 20 hours. Cells were incubated with 10 μg/mL of Hoechst 33342 for 10 minutes and images were taken with a Axiovert S100 (Zeiss) Fluorescence Microscope equipped with a 40 × oil objective (Zeiss) with excitation/emission at 350/535 nm. For each treatment, 200–600 cells were analyzed for presence of chromatin condensation characteristic of apoptosis.
Immunocytochemistry to detect active Bax
The procedure was described previously [58] with modifications noted here. Briefly, cells were plated at 1×106/mL and treated with 10 μM BIRD-2, 10 μM BIRD-2ctrl, or 2.5 μM staurosporine. After 4 hours of incubation, cells were collected, washed twice with ice-cold PBS, and fixed for 10 minutes at room temperature in 2% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Cells were then washed twice with ice-cold PBS and permeabilized for 30 minutes at room temperature in a solution containing 0.1% Triton X-100 and 2% BSA in PBS. Following two additional washes with ice-cold PBS, samples were incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature in blocking buffer containing 2% BSA in PBS and incubated overnight at 4°C with 0.65 μg Bax 6A7 antibody (BD Pharmingen) or 0.65 μg Normal Mouse IgG antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) in PBS containing 2% BSA. After two washes with PBS, samples were incubated for 1 hour at room temperature in the dark with AlexaFluor 488 Goat Anti-Mouse secondary antibody (Invitrogen) at a concentration of 1:175 in PBS containing 2% BSA. Samples were washed twice in the dark and images were acquired through a QImaging camera on a Nikon Eclipse TE2000-S microscope equipped with a 20× objective using MetaMorph software.
Calcium imaging
Techniques for single-cell digital imaging of Fura-2-AM-loaded cells were described previously [16, 53].
Immunoblotting
The procedures were described previously [53]. The following antibodies were used: anti-Bcl-2 (Santa Cruz, sc-7382); anti-Mcl-1 (Biovision, 3035-100); anti-Bim (Cell Signaling, 2933); anti-PARP (Cell Signaling, 9542); anti-cleaved Caspase-3 (Cell Signaling, 9661); and, anti-beta-actin (Sigma, A2228).
RT-PCR
RNA was isolated from cells treated with either BIRD-2 or BIRD-2ctrl and RT-PCR used to assess the expression levels for Bcl-2 and Bim using previously described methods [59].
Xenograft model
Animal protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, Case Western Reserve University. Tumor xenografts were established by subcutaneous injection of 9 × 106 NCI-H929 cells into the flank of 5–7 week old NCR nu/nu mice. Tumor size was measured by caliper and tumor volume was estimated by the formula as: Volume (mm3) = 0.5 × (length) × (width)2, where length and width represents the long and short diameter of a tumor, respectively. When tumors reached an average size of 60–80 mm3, peritumoral injection of saline or BIRD-2 (at the dose of 10 mg/kg) was performed every 2-3 days for a total of four injections. Mice were sacrificed 18 days after tumor inoculation and tumors were excised and weighed.
Statistical analysis
A Mann-Whitney u test (xenograft experiments) or Student t test (apoptosis and viability assays) was used to determine significant differences between two treatment groups. A two-tailed p-value of 0.05 or 0.01 (as indicated in text) was the threshold for significance.
Acknowledgments
We thank Jan Parys and Geert Bultynck for helpful discussions, providing valuable reagents and novel insights gained in their laboratory.
Footnotes
GRANT SUPPORT
This work was supported by the Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Foundation, and National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants RO1 CA085804 (C.W.D.), R25 CA148052 (M-J.C.), T32 CA059366 (E.G.), 5T32HL007147 (A.R.L.) and 5T32GM007250 (A.R.L.). EG is a trainee in the Case Physician Scientist Pathway at MetroHealth Medical Center.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
CWD is issued Patent US 8,034,779 B2 “Inhibitors of BCL-2” covering the use of the peptide referred to herein as BIRD-2 and targeting Bcl-2-IP3R interaction for cancer treatment.
Authorship contributions
ARL performed experiments and prepared the manuscript and figures; FZ and M-JC performed experiments and assisted in data interpretation; EG designed experiments; YC designed and performed experiments; EG, ARL, MRS, KSM, JP, FJR, and SM provided technical guidance and helpful suggestions regarding experimental design and interpretation of findings; CWD organized and led the project. ARL and CWD made figures and wrote the manuscript.
REFERENCES
- 1.Yip KW, Reed JC. Bcl-2 family proteins and cancer. Oncogene. 2008;27:6398–6406. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Youle RJ, Strasser A. The Bcl-2 protein family: opposing activities that mediate cell death. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:47–59. doi: 10.1038/nrm2308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chipuk JE, Moldoveanu T, Llambi F, Parsons MJ, Green DR. The BCL-2 family reunion. Mol Cell. 2010;37:299–310. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.01.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tse C, Shoemaker AR, Adickes J, Anderson MG, Chen J, Jin S, Johnson EF, Marsh KC, Mitten MJ, Nimmer P, Roberts L, Tahir SK, Xiao Y, Yang X, Zhang H, Fesik S, et al. ABT-263: A potent and orally bioavailable Bcl-2 family inhibitor. Cancer Res. 2008;68:3421–3328. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Souers AJ, Leverson JD, Boghaert ER, Ackler SL, Catron ND, Chen J, Dayton BD, Ding H, Enschede SH, Fairbrother WJ, Huang DC, Hymowitz SG, Jin S, Khaw SL, Kovar PJ, Lam LT, et al. ABT-9, a potent and selective BCL-2 inhibitor, achieves antitumor activity while sparing platelets. Nat Med. 2013;19:202–208. doi: 10.1038/nm.3048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Letai AG. Diagnosing and exploiting cancer’s addiction to blocks in apoptosis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:121–132. doi: 10.1038/nrc2297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Davids MS, Letai A. ABT-199: taking dead aim at BCL-2. Cancer Cell. 2013;23:139–141. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.01.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Vandenberg CJ, Cory S. ABT-199, a new Bcl-2-specific BH3 mimetic, has in vivo efficacy against aggressive Myc-driven mouse lymphomas without provoking thrombocytopenia. Blood. 2013;121:2285–2288. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-01-475855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Greenberg EF, Lavik AR, Distelhorst CW. Bcl-2 regulation of the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor and calcium signaling in normal and malignant lymphocytes: Potential new target for cancer treatment. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1843:2205–2210. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Akl H, Vervloessem T, Kiviluoto S, Bittremieux M, Parys JB, De Smedt H, Bultynck G. A dual role for the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 protein in cancer: mitochondria versus endoplasmic reticulum. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1843:2240–2252. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chang MJ, Zhong F, Lavik AR, Parys JB, Berridge MJ, Distelhorst CW. Feedback regulation mediated by Bcl-2 and DARPP-32 regulates inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor phosphorylation and promotes cell survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:1186–1191. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1323098111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rong Y, Bultynck G, Aromolaran AS, Zhong F, Parys JB, De Smedt H, Mignery GA, Roderick HL, Bootman MD, Distelhorst CW. The BH4 domain of Bcl-2 inhibits ER calcium release and apoptosis by binding the regulatory and coupling domain of the IP3 receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106:14397–14402. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907555106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Monaco G, Decrock E, Akl H, Ponsaerts R, Vervliet T, Luyten T, De Maeyer M, Missiaen L, Distelhorst CW, De Smedt H, Parys JB, Leybaert L, Bultynck G. Selective regulation of IP(3)-receptor-mediated Ca(2+) signaling and apoptosis by the BH4 domain of Bcl-2 versus Bcl-Xl. Cell Death Differ. 2012;19:295–309. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2011.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rong Y, Aromolaran AS, Bultynck G, Zhong F, Li X, McColl KS, Herlitze S, Matsuyama S, Roderick HL, Bootman MD, Mignery GA, Parys JB, DeSmedt H, Distelhorst CW. Targeting Bcl-2-IP3 receptor interaction to reverse Bcl-2′s inhibition of apoptotic calcium signals. Mol Cell. 2008;31:255–265. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.06.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhong F, Harr MW, Bultynck G, Monaco G, Parys JB, DeSmedt H, Rong Y-P, Molitoris JK, Lam M, Ryder C, Matsuyama S, Distelhorst CW. Induction of Ca2+-driven apoptosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells by peptide-mediated disruption of Bcl-2-IP3 receptor interaction. Blood. 2011;117:2924–2934. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-09-307405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Akl H, Monaco G, La Rovere R, Welkenhuyzen K, Kiviluoto S, Vervliet T, Molgo J, Distelhorst CW, Missiaen L, Mikoshiba K, Parys JB, De Smedt H, Bultynck G. IP3R2 levels dictate the apoptotic sensitivity of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cells to an IP3R-derived peptide targeting the BH4 domain of Bcl-2. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4:e632. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2013.140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gomez-Bougie P, Oliver L, Le Gouill S, Bataille R, Amiot M. Melphalan-induced apoptosis in multiple myeloma cells is associated with a cleavage of Mcl-1 and Bim and a decrease in the Mcl-1//Bim complex. Oncogene. 2005;24:8076–8079. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhang LN, Li JY, Xu W. A review of the role of Puma, Noxa and Bim in the tumorigenesis, therapy and drug resistance of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer Gene Ther. 2013;20:1–7. doi: 10.1038/cgt.2012.84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Del Gaizo Moore V, Brown JR, Certo M, Love TM, Novina CD, Letai A. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia requires BCL2 to sequester prodeath BIM, explaining sensitivity to BCL2 antagonist ABT-737. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:112–121. doi: 10.1172/JCI28281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cante-Barrett K, Gallo EM, Winslow MM, Crabtree GR. Thymocyte negative selection is mediated by protein kinase C- and Ca2+-dependent transcriptional induction of Bim of cell death. J Immunol. 2006;176:2299–2306. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.4.2299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mohammad RM, Mohamed AN, Smith MR, Jawadi NS, Al-Katib A. A unique EBV-negative low-grade lymphoma line (WSU-FSCCL) exhibiting both t(14, 18) and t(8;11) Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics. 1993;70:62–67. doi: 10.1016/0165-4608(93)90132-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Touzeau C, Dousset C, Le Gouill S, Sampath D, Leverson JD, Souers AJ, Maiga S, Bene MC, Moreau P, Pellat-Deceunynck C, Amiot M. The Bcl-2 specific BH3 mimetic ABT-199: a promising targeted therapy for t(11, 14) multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2014;28:210–212. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Moreaux J, Klein B, Bataille R, Descamps G, Maiga S, Hose D, Goldschmidt H, Jauch A, Reme T, Jourdan M, Amiot M, Pellat-Deceunynck C. A high-risk signature for patients with multiple myeloma established from the molecular classification of human myeloma cell lines. Haematologica. 2011;96:574–582. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2010.033456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bouillet P, Metcalf D, Huang DC, Tarlinton DM, Kay TW, Kontgen F, Adams JM, Strasser A. Proapoptotic Bcl-2 relative Bim required for certain apoptotic responses, leukocyte homeostasis, and to preclude autoimmunity. Science. 1999;286:1735–1738. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5445.1735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wang Z, Malone MH, He H, McColl KS, Distelhorst CW. Microarray analysis uncovers the induction of the proapoptotic BH3-only protein Bim in multiple models of glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:23861–23867. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M301843200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhang L, Insel PA. The pro-apoptotic protein Bim is a convergence point for cAMP/protein kinase A- and glucocorticoid-promoted apoptosis in lymphoid cells. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:20858–20865. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M310643200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Erlacher M, Michalak EM, Kelly PN, Labi V, Niederegger H, Coultas L, Adams JM, Strasser A, Villunger A. BH3-only proteins Puma and Bim are rate-limiting for gamma-radiation- and glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis of lymphoid cells in vivo. Blood. 2005;106:4131–4138. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-04-1595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Spaargaren M, de Rooij MFM, Kater AP, Eldering E. BTK inhibitors in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a glimpse to the future. Oncogene. 2015;34:2426–2436. doi: 10.1038/onc.2014.181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Herman SEM, Gordon AL, Hertlein E, Ramanunni A, Zhang X, Jaglowski S, Flynn J, Jones J, Blum KA, Buggy JJ, Hamdy A, Johnson AJ, Byrd JC. Bruton tyrosine kinase represents a promising therapeutic target for treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and is effectively targeted by PCI-32765. Blood. 2011;117:6287–6296. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-01-328484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.de Rooij MFM, Kuil A, Geest CR, Eldering E, Chang BY, Buggy JJ, Pals ST, Spaargaren M. The clinically active BTK inhibitor PCI-32765 targets B-cell receptor- and chemokine-controlled adhesion and migration in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2012;119:2590–2594. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-11-390989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cheng S, Ma J, Guo A, Lu P, Leonard JP, Coleman M, Liu M, Buggy JJ, Furman RR, Wang YL. BTK inhibition targets in vivo CLL proliferation through its effects on B-cell receptor signaling activity. Leukemia. 2014;28:649–657. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cameron F, Sanford M. Ibrutinib: First Global Approval. Drugs. 2014;74:263–271. doi: 10.1007/s40265-014-0178-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yang Y, Shi J, Gu Z, Salama ME, Das S, Wendlandt E, Xu H, Huang J, Tao Y, Hao M, Franqui R, Levasseur D, Janz S, Tricot G, Zhan F. Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Is a Therapeutic Target in Stem-like Cells from Multiple Myeloma. Cancer Research. 2015;75:594–604. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-2362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tai Y-T, Anderson KC. Bruton’s tyrosine kinase: oncotarget in myeloma. Oncotarget. 2012;3:2012. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ma J, Lu P, Guo A, Cheng S, Zong H, Martin P, Coleman M, Wang YL. Characterization of ibrutinib-sensitive and -resistant mantle lymphoma cells. British Journal of Haematology. 2014;166:849–861. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zheng X, Ding N, Song Y, Feng L, Zhu J. Different sensitivity of germinal center B cell-like diffuse large B cell lymphoma cells towards ibrutinib treatment. Cancer Cell International. 2014;14:32. doi: 10.1186/1475-2867-14-32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Woyach JA, Furman RR, Liu T-M, Ozer HG, Zapatka M, Ruppert AS, Xue L, Li DH-H, Steggerda SM, Versele M, Dave SS, Zhang J, Yilmaz AS, Jaglowski SM, Blum KA, Lozanski A, et al. Resistance Mechanisms for the Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Ibrutinib. New England Journal of Medicine. 2014;370:2286–2294. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1400029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Furman RR, Cheng S, Lu P, Setty M, Perez AR, Guo A, Racchumi J, Xu G, Wu H, Ma J, Steggerda SM, Coleman M, Leslie C, Wang YL. Ibrutinib Resistance in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. New England Journal of Medicine. 2014;370:2352–2354. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1402716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Liu T-M, Woyach JA, Zhong Y, Lozanski A, Lozanski G, Dong S, Strattan E, Lehman A, Zhang X, Jones JA, Flynn J, Andritsos LA, Maddocks K, Jaglowski SM, Blum KA, Byrd JC, et al. Hypermorphic mutation of phospholipase C, gamma 2 acquired in ibrutinib resistant CLL confers BTK independency upon BCR activation. Blood. 2015;126:61–68. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-02-626846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Pettersson M, Jernberg-Wiklund H, Larsson LG, Sundstrom C, Givol I, Tsujimoto Y, Nilsson K. Expression of the bcl-2 gene in human multiple myeloma cell lines and normal plasma cells. Blood. 1992;79:495–502. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Honigberg LA, Smith AM, Sirisawad M, Verner E, Loury D, Chang B, Li S, Pan Z, Thamm DH, Miller RA, Buggy JJ. The Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor PCI-32765 blocks B-cell activation and is efficacious in models of autoimmune disease and B-cell malignancy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:13075–13080. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1004594107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Advani R, Buggy J, Sharman J, Smith S, Boyd T, Grant B, Kolibaba K, Furman R, Rodriguez S, Chang B, Sukbuntherng J, Izumi R, Hamdy A, Hedrick E, Fowler N. Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib (PCI-32765) has significant activity in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:88–94. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.7906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Dubovsky JA, Beckwith KA, Natarajan G, Woyach JA, Jaglowski S, Zhong Y, Hessler JD, Liu T-M, Chang BY, Larkin KM, Stefanovski MR, Chappell DL, Frissora FW, Smith LL, Smucker KA, Flynn JM, et al. Ibrutinib is an irreversible molecular inhibitor of ITK driving a Th1-selective pressure in T lymphocytes. Blood. 2013;122:2539–2549. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-06-507947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sagiv-Barfi I, Kohrt HEK, Czerwinski DK, Ng PP, Chang BY, Levy R. Therapeutic antitumor immunity by checkpoint blockade is enhanced by ibrutinib, an inhibitor of both BTK and ITK. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:E966–E972. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1500712112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Abdi J, Chen G, Chang H. Drug resistance in multiple myeloma: latest findings and new concepts on molecular mechanisms. Oncotarget. 2013;4:2013. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.1497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Röllig C, Knop S, Bornhäuser M. Multiple myeloma. The Lancet. 2015;385:2197–2208. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60493-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hiddemann W, Cheson BD. How we manage follicular lymphoma. Leukemia. 2014;28:1388–1395. doi: 10.1038/leu.2014.91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Chauhan D, Velankar M, Brahmandam M, Hideshima T, Podar K, Richardson P, Schlossman R, Ghobrial I, Raje N, Munshi N, Anderson KC. A novel Bcl-2/Bcl-X(L)/Bcl-w inhibitor ABT-737 as therapy in multiple myeloma. Oncogene. 2007;26:2374–2380. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kline MP, Rajkumar SV, Timm MM, Kimlinger TK, Haug JL, Lust JA, Greipp PR, Kumar S. ABT-737, an inhibitor of Bcl-2 family proteins, is a potent inducer of apoptosis in multiple myeloma cells. Leukemia. 2007;21:1549–1560. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Trudel S, Stewart AK, Li Z, Shu Y, Liang SB, Trieu Y, Reece D, Paterson J, Wang D, Wen XY. The Bcl-2 family protein inhibitor, ABT-737, has substantial antimyeloma activity and shows synergistic effect with dexamethasone and melphalan. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:621–629. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bodet L, Gomez-Bougie P, Touzeau C, Dousset C, Descamps G, Maiga S, Avet-Loiseau H, Bataille R, Moreau P, Le Gouill S, Pellat-Deceunynck C, Amiot M. ABT-737 is highly effective against molecular subgroups of multiple myeloma. Blood. 2011;118:3901–3910. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-11-317438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Chen R, Valencia I, Zhong F, McColl KS, Roderick HL, Bootman MD, Berridge MJ, Conway SJ, Holmes AB, Mignery GA, Velez P, Distelhorst CW. Bcl-2 functionally interacts with inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors to regulate calcium release from the ER. J Cell Biol. 2004;166:193–203. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200309146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Roderick HL, Cook SJ. Ca2+ signalling checkpoints in cancer: remodelling Ca2+ for cancer cell proliferation and survival. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:361–365. doi: 10.1038/nrc2374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Prevarskaya N, Skryma R, Shuba Y. Calcium in tumour metastasis: new roles for known actors. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:609–618. doi: 10.1038/nrc3105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Monteith GR, McAndrew D, Faddy HM, Roberts-Thomson SJ. Calcium and cancer: targeting Ca2+ transport. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:519–530. doi: 10.1038/nrc2171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Shi JL, Fu L, Wang WD. High expression of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor, type 2 (ITPR2) as a novel biomarker for worse prognosis in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia. Oncotarget. 2015;6:5299–5309. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Kudo W, Lee HP, Smith MA, Zhu X, Matsuyama S, Lee HG. Inhibition of Bax protects neuronal cells from oligomeric A β neurotoxicity. Cell Death Dis. 2012;3:e309. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2012.43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ryder C, McColl K, Zhong F, Distelhorst CW. Acidosis Promotes Bcl-2 Family Mediated Evasion of Apoptosis: Involvement of Acid-Sensing G Protein-Coupled Receptor GPR65 Signaling to MEK/ERK. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:27863–27875. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.384685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]