Abstract
The tumor microenvironment has been suggested to participate in tumorigenesis, but the nature of the communication between cancer cells and the microenvironment, especially in response to anticancer drugs, remains obscure. We determined that activation of the CCAAT/enhancer binding protein delta (CEBPD) response to Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil in cancer-associated macrophages and fibroblasts contributed to the metastasis, invasion, acquired chemoresistance and stemness of cancer cells by in vitro and in vivo assays. Specifically, reporter and in vivo DNA binding assays were used to determine that Pentraxin 3 (PTX3) is a CEBPD responsive gene and serves a protumor role upon anticancer drug treatment. Finally, a PTX3 peptide inhibitor RI37 was developed and assessed the antitumor effects by in vivo assays. RI37 could function as a promising inhibitor for preventing cancer progression and the metastasis, invasion and progression of drug-resistant cancers. The identification of PTX3 provided a new insight in the interaction between host and tumor and the RI37 peptide showed a great opportunity to largely reduce the risk of invasion and metastasis of cancer and drug-resistant cancers.
Keywords: CEBPD, PTX3, TAMs, CAFs, tumor microenvironment
INTRODUCTION
Anticancer drug resistance is one of the major challenges in cancer therapy. The majority of cancer patients receive chemotherapy after surgical intervention. However, even when chemotherapy appears successful, cancer patients still face the risk of recurrence of the same or a drug-resistant cancer. Therefore, understanding the relationship between host and tumor may inform the identification and design of more effective therapies to overcome the spread or recurrence of cancer and improve the outcome of cancer therapies.
Previous studies have indicated that the tumor microenvironment provides a protective niche for cancer progression [1-4]. Clinical evidence also showed a strong association between the number of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and poor prognosis in several types of cancer [5-8]. TAMs are primarily a macrophage subpopulation with an M2 phenotype [9] and the CAFs detected are predominantly myofibroblasts [10], both of which respond differently to various microenvironmental signals and serve as a source of cytokines released in the cancer-initiating cell microenvironment [11]. However, the responses of M2 macrophages/TAMs and myofibroblasts/CAFs to anticancer drugs and the consequent effects, including the metastasis, invasion, acquired chemoresistance and stemness of cancer cells, remain largely uninvestigated.
CEBPD belongs to the CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP) family of transcription factors. Under normal physiological conditions, CEBPD is not highly expressed, but it can be upregulated by a variety of extracellular stimuli, including IL-1β, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and TNFα [12-14]. CEBPD regulates or co-regulates a wide range of inflammatory factors, such as TNFα, IL-1β, IL-6, CXCL1 [15], chemokines, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP1) and IL-10 [16, 17]. CEBPD is thought to function as a tumor suppressor in cancer cells because the loss of CEBPD promotes tumor progression [18]. Clinically, the silencing of CEBPD has been observed in many cancers, including cervical cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, prostate cancer, leukemia and breast cancer [15]. We previously demonstrated that the polycomb group complex and DNA methyltransferase mediated the hypermethylation of the CEBPD promoter in cervical cancer cells [18]. Interestingly, a recent study showed an increase in mammary tumor multiplicity and a decrease in lung metastasis in Cebpd−/−/HER2/neu mice [19]. This result is consistent with the possibility that CEBPD acts as a tumor suppressor in cancer cells but may contribute to invasion and metastasis in stromal cells in the tumor microenvironment. Importantly, our study showed that an increase in the CEBPD level in M2 macrophages in response to PGE2 resulted in enhanced production of IL-10 and PTX3 and had a protumor effect [17]. However, the details of CEBPD biology in the tumor microenvironment, as well as its biological impacts and potential application in cancer therapy, remain largely unknown.
Pentraxins are a family of evolutionarily conserved proteins that function at the crossroads between innate immunity, inflammation, matrix deposition and female fertility [20]. PTX3 consists of a C-terminal domain similar to those of classical pentraxins, such as C-reactive protein and serum amyloid P component, and an unrelated N-terminal domain [21]. PTX3 synthesis is stimulated by a variety of molecules that participate in the inflammatory process, including LPS, IL-1β and TNFα [22, 23]. PTX3 is mainly composed of octamers that are covalently linked by intra- and inter-chain disulfide bonds [24] and glycosylation has been suggested to modulate PTX3 function during inflammation [23]. Previously, we found that PTX3 is a downstream target of CEBPD in macrophages and functions to reduce the macrophage-mediated phagocytosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Moreover, although a high PTX3 abundance has been observed in the serum of several cancers, including liposarcoma, prostate cancer, lung cancer and breast cancer [25-27], the precise role of PTX3 in tumorigenesis remains largely uninvestigated.
In this study, we elucidated the biology of the CEBPD response to anticancer drugs in cancer-associated macrophages and fibroblasts. We found that activation of CEBPD in the tumor microenvironment contributed to the metastasis, invasion, acquired chemoresistance and stemness of cancer cells. We next demonstrated that PTX3, a gene that is directly regulated by CEBPD, can fully support the protumor role of CEBPD in the tumor microenvironment. We further developed a PTX3 inhibitor RI37 peptide to prevent CEBPD/PTX3 axis-induced cancer malignancies and reduce the metastasis and invasion of drug-resistant cancers.
RESULTS
Activation of CEBPD in M2 macrophages and myofibroblasts/CAFs contributes to the acquired chemoresistance, stemness, migration and invasion of cancer cells
The critical role of the microenvironment in cancer progression and response to therapies, such as radiation and anticancer drugs, is being increasingly recognized [1, 2, 28-31]. However, the molecular components of the interaction between cancer and host cells remain largely uninvestigated. Importantly, as well as breast cancer cells (Fig. S1), the transcription factor CEBPD was induced in THP-1 M2-like macrophages (THP-1/M2), mouse M2 macrophages, HFL1 myofibroblasts (HFL1-MF) cells and cancer associated fibroblast/F28 (CAF/F28) cells upon treatment with Cisplatin (CDDP) or 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) (Figure. 1A). This observation prompted us to examine whether anticancer drug-induced upregulation of CEBPD in the tumor microenvironment contributed to the stemness of cancer cells and to the metastasis and invasion of anticancer drug-resistant cancer cells.
First, we found that conditioned media from CEBPD-expressing THP-1/M2 or CAF/F28 cells attenuated E-cadherin and increased N-cadherin, Twist1 and Snail2 transcripts in MDA-MB231 (MB231) cells (Figure. 1B) and enhanced sphere formation of MB231 cells (Figure. 1C). Moreover, conditioned media from CDDP- or 5-FU-treated THP-1/M2 or CAF/F28 cells lacking CEBPD reverse the expression of EMT/stemness markers and significantly inhibited this sphere-forming ability in vitro (Figure. 1B and 1C) and tumorigenicity in NOD/SCID mice (Figure. 1D). These results indicate that increased expression of CEBPD in M2 macrophages and myofibroblasts/CAFs contributes to the stemness of cancer cells. We also assessed whether CEBPD in THP-1/M2 cells and CAF/F28 cells contributed to the anticancer drug resistance exhibited by cancer cells. We found that MB231 cells were sensitized to CDDP and 5-FU when they were cultured in conditioned media from THP-1/M2 or CAF/F28 cells lacking CEBPD (Figure. S2).
Next, following the generation of CDDP-resistant mCherry fluorescent MB231 (mcCDRMB231), 5-FU-resistant mCherry fluorescent MB231 (mcFURMB231), CDDP-resistant mCherry fluorescent 4T1 (mcCDR4T1) and 5-FU-resistant mCherry fluorescent 4T1 (mcFUR4T1) cell lines (Figure. S3), we assessed the effect of anticancer drug-induced CEBPD in M2 macrophages and CAFs on the metastasis and invasion of drug-resistant cancer cells. Conditioned medium from CEBPD-expressing THP-1/M2 or CAF/F28 cells promoted the migration and invasion of mcCDRMB231 cells (Figure. 2A). Moreover, conditioned media from CDDP- or 5-FU-stimulated THP-1/M2 cells, mouse M2 macrophages, HFL1-MF cells and CAF/F28 cells also promoted the migration and invasion of mcCDRMB231, mcFURMB231, mcCDR4T1 and mcFUR4T1 cells (Figure. 2B and Figure. S4A). In contrast, these effects were attenuated when conditioned medium from M2 macrophages or myofibroblasts/CAFs lacking CEBPD was used (Figure. 2B and Figure. S4A).
We further assessed the in vivo effects of activated CEBPD in stroma on the CDDP treatment of CDDP-resistant cancer cells. First, mcCDRMB231 cells were co-transplanted with THP-1/M2 cells carried control knockdown vector (shC-M2MΦ) or CEBPD knockdown vector (shD-M2MΦ) or CAF/F28 cells with control knockdown vector (shC-CAF) or CEBPD knockdown vector (shD-CAF) into NOD-SCID mice. After CDDP treatment, the mcCDRMB231 cells co-transplanted with shC-M2MΦ cells showed greater growth than those co-transplanted with shD-M2MΦ (Figure. 2C and 2D). Moreover, cancer growth was enhanced in mcCDRMB231/shC-CAF co-transplants upon CDDP treatment compared with mcCDRMB231/shD-CAF co-transplants (Figure. 2C and 2D). In agreement with the results showing increased growth compared with THP-1/M2 or CAF/F28 cells without CEBPD, the number of metastatic and invasive mcCDRMB231 cells in the lungs was increased in co-transplants with shC-M2MΦ or shC-CAF cells upon CDDP treatment (Figure. 2E). Next, mcCDR4T1 cells were co-transplanted with mouse Cebpd+/+ or Cebpd−/− M2 macrophages or myofibroblasts into NOD-SCID mice. After CDDP treatment, mcCDR4T1 tumors were larger in size and showed greater metastatic activity when co-transplanted with Cebpd+/+ M2 macrophages or myofibroblasts than co-transplants with Cebpd−/− M2 macrophages or myofibroblasts (Figure. S4B). These results suggest that drug-induced CEBPD activation in the tumor microenvironment promotes the migration and invasion of chemoresistant cancers.
CEBPD upregulates PTX3 in M2 macrophages and myofibroblasts/CAFs
We previously demonstrated that CEBPD-induced PTX3 in macrophages promotes cancer progression by preventing the macrophage-mediated phagocytosis of tumor cells [17]. To further dissect the participation and regulation of the PTX3 gene in response to CDDP and 5-FU in the tumor microenvironment, the expression of PTX3 gene and the effects of the PTX3 were investigated, respectively, by following in vitro and in vivo assays. The PTX3 transcript and protein levels were significantly increased in response to both CDDP and 5-FU in THP-1/M2 and CAF/F28 cells (Figure. 3A and 3B). The CDDP- and 5-FU-induced PTX3 reporter activities were attenuated by the knockdown of CEBPD (Figure. 3C). An in vivo DNA binding assay further showed that the binding of CEBPD to the PTX3 promoter was induced upon CDDP or 5-FU treatment (Figure. 3D). These results indicate that CEBPD activates PTX3 transcription in response to treatment with CDDP or 5-FU by directly binding to its promoter region in M2 macrophages and CAFs.
PTX3 is involved in the CEBPD-induced acquired chemoresistance, stemness and metastasis/invasion of cancer cells
We found that the activation of CEBPD in M2-like macrophages and CAFs contributed to stemness and the migration and invasion of cancer cells that were both susceptible and resistant to drugs. We further tested whether PTX3 contributed to CEBPD-enhanced protumor activity. Conditioned media from THP-1/M2 or CAF/F28 cells lacking PTX3 could reverse the E-cadherin transcripts but attenuated N-cadherin, Twist1 and Snail2 transcripts in MB231 cells (Figure. S5A). Moreover, the conditioned media from THP-1/M2 or CAF/F28 cells lacking PTX3 could decrease in vitro sphere-forming ability and in vivo tumorigenicity in MB231 xenografted NOD/SCID mice (Figure. 4A and 4B). It also increased sensitivity of MB231 cells in response to CDDP and 5-FU (Figure. S5B) and decreased the in vitro migration and invasion of CDDP-treated mcCDRMB231 or 5-FU-treated mcFURMB231 cells (Figure. 4C). We further assessed the effects of PTX3 by examining in vivo tumor growth and metastasis/invasion of mcCDRMB231 cells upon CDDP treatment in a PTX3-enriched or depleted environment. mcCDRMB231 cells were co-transplanted with THP-1/M2 or CAF/F28 cells into NOD-SCID mice. Upon CDDP treatment, the co-transplants that were stably expressing the PTX3 knockdown vector (shP) were smaller and exhibited less metastatic activity compared with co-transplants of mcCDRMB231 cells with shC-M2MΦ or shC-CAF cells (Figure. 4D-4F). These results indicate that activated PTX3 in M2 macrophages or CAFs promotes the growth, metastasis and invasion of drug-resistant cancers. The data also suggest that PTX3 could be a therapeutic target for the development of a potent anticancer drug.
PTX3 may be a therapeutic target for preventing the stemness, migration and invasion of cancer cells
The loss-of-function assay indicated that PTX3 contributed to CDDP- and 5FU-induced protumor effects in drug-susceptible and resistant breast cancer cells, respectively. In addition, a recent study showed that glycosylation of Asn220 is important for PTX3 regulation of inflammation and immunity [23, 32]. Recombinant PTX3 proteins purified from insect cells (bvPTX3) has no effect on the proliferation of MB231 cells (Figure. 5A and 5B), promotion of sphere-forming ability in vitro (Figure. 5C), enhancement of anticancer-drug resistance (Figure. 5D) and migration and invasion of mcCDRMB231 cells in vitro (Figure. 5E). Importantly, the recombinant bvPTX3 mutant of Asn220 (mbvPTX3) dramatically inhibited all the above bvPTX3-induced phenomena (Figure. 5C-5E). These results implied that glycosylation of PTX3 at Asn220 is critical for its protumor function. We next synthesized the PTX3 peptides RI37 (amino acids 200-236) and KT44 (amino acids 255-298) and tested their antitumor effects (Figure. 6A). We found that RI37 suppressed the growth, metastasis and invasion of drug-resistant cancers in vivo (Figure. 6B-6E). This study implied that RI37 may be an antagonist of PTX3-enhanced sphere-forming ability, anticancer-drug resistance, migration and invasion of cancer cells.
DISCUSSION
Tumor shrinkage is usually accomplished with cancer therapy, but this benefit is transient and most patients eventually develop chemotherapy-resistant and widely disseminated cancer. As described above, CEBPD is induced by many inflammatory factors and in turn contributes to the activation of many inflammatory factors in macrophages [15, 33]. An increase in mammary tumor multiplicity and a decrease in lung metastasis were observed in HER2/neuTg mice lacking CEBPD [19]. In the current study, we demonstrated a novel function of CEBPD: the molecule plays a protumor role in noncancerous cell types, such as fibroblasts and macrophages, in the context of the cancer microenvironment. Previously, CEBPD was suggested to be involved in M1 macrophage polarization [34]. Our preliminary data showed that the loss of CEBPD attenuated the differentiation of both M1 and M2 macrophages by verifying their macrophage markers following differentiation by GM-CSF or M-CSF-treated primary mouse monocytes (Ju-Ming Wang's unpublished results). The result indicated that CEBPD contributes to both M1 and M2 macrophage differentiation but the detailed regulation of CEBPD-mediated M1 and M2 macrophages needs to be further investigated. We showed that the activation of CEBPD in M2 macrophages and myofibroblasts/CAFs promoted sphere-forming ability and the metastasis and invasion of both responsive and drug-resistant cancers. Our data suggest that CEBPD plays an important role in microenvironment-mediated cancer progression. Our study also indicates that the dissection of CEBPD biology in the tumor microenvironment could suggest targets for developing anticancer reagents, such as the RI37 peptides demonstrated here, that may be used for cancer therapy in the future (Figure. 6F).
CAFs and TAMs increase tumor cell growth and motility, ultimately facilitating cancer cell escape from the primary tumor and thereby inducing metastatic spread. Recently, chemotherapies directed against some of these targets, which are overexpressed by breast tumor cells as well as by TAMs and CAFs in a tumor microenvironment, resulted in the elimination of tumor growth, progression, metastasis and recurrence in mouse tumor models. Previously, we suggested that PGE2-activated CEBPD may play a protumor role in the tumor microenvironment [17]. In this study, we found that CEBPD was also activated by CDDP and 5-FU in TAM and CAF cells (Figure. 1A). In addition to its functions in immunosuppression and inhibition of cancer cell phagocytosis by activated macrophages [17], we revealed a novel CEBPD function in the tumor microenvironment, namely, the promotion of sphere-forming ability, metastasis and invasion of drug-resistant cancers in CDDP- or 5-FU-treated TAMs and CAFs.
In response to extracellular stresses and inflammatory cytokines, several processes, including induction of cell migration, angiogenesis, immunosuppression and inhibition of phagocytosis, have been observed and are associated with inflammation. These inflammatory responses have also been linked to the initiation of cancer and cancer progression and even the occurrence of chemoresistance. However, the details of this link largely remain unclear, especially the responses associated with anticancer drug-induced inflammation-like environments. Pentraxin family members are characterized by a cyclic multimeric structure and contain a conserved carboxy-terminal domain called a pentraxin domain. In addition to its wide use as a marker of inflammation and infection, PTX3 has been observed at increased levels in several cancers, as mentioned previously. However, unlike the well-studied involvement of other pentraxin members in cancer [35, 36], the biology of PTX3 in cancer is less well understood.
Interestingly, as well as bvPTX3, our preliminary results showed that the recombinant PTX3 protein purified from mammal cells (euPTX3) has no effect on the proliferation of various cancer cells, but in agreement with the above observations, euPTX3 promoted sphere-forming ability in vitro, attenuated E-cadherin and increased N-cadherin, Twist1 and Snail2 transcripts, increased drug-resistance and migration and invasion of mcCDRMB231 cells in vitro. In addition, CD44 is also expressed in various types of cancer cells and cancer stem cells. Early observations have demonstrated a significant correlation between CD44 and tumor recurrence and mortality. CD44 may be an indicator of tumors and metastasis in malignant cancers [37, 38]. It has been speculated that PTX3 could form a complex with TSG6 and CD44 [39]. However, the involvement of CD44 in PTX3-induced tumorigenesis remains further investigation. As shown in Fig. S6, as well as mbvPTX3, RI37 has no direct effect on the growth of cancer cells. However, RI37 could attenuate the growth of xenografted cancers (Figure 6B and 6C). The in vivo result implies that PTX3 can play an autocrine/paracrine role to stimulate pro-growth factor(s) from stromal cells surrounding cancer cells.
In the current study, we further revealed involvement of PTX3 in the tumor microenvironment in promoting cancer metastasis, invasion and stemness. Our findings not only describe the biological significance of PTX3 in tumorigenesis but also suggest that PTX3 may be a key pro-tumorigenic player in the tumor microenvironment. In addition, the mutant bvPTX3 and RI37 further supported this speculation. Recently, a group showed that PTX3 inhibited FGF/FGFR-driven EMT in human A375 and A2058 melanoma cells [40]. They further demonstrated that PTX3 was a potent FGF antagonist and was endowed with anti-angiogensis and anti-neoplastic activity in mouse prostate TRAMP-C2 cancer cells [41]. As well as MB231, A549 and HONE1 cells, our results also showed that euPTX3 promoted the migration and invasion of prostate cancer PC3 and LNCaP cells (Figure. S7A and S7B). Several recent studies mentioned above [25-27] and the current study supported the protumor role of PTX3, we still cannot rule out the possibility that the protumor role of PTX3 may act in a cell line-, tumor- or species-specific manner.
Patients with recurrent cancers, especially those with anticancer drug-resistant cancers, are always at a higher risk because these cancers always spread faster than the original tumor. Nevertheless, the mechanisms related to this issue are less understood and largely uninvestigated. The activation of CEBPD induces apoptosis of cancer cells [18, 42]. Comparing to the activation of CEBPD in tumor-associated stromal cells, the activation of CEBPD is insensitive in breast cancer cells because an epigenetic-mediated hypermethylation on the promoter region of CEBPD gene [43, 44]. The hypermethylated CEBPD promoter can attenuate the responses of CBEPD and its downstream targets in cancer cells [18]. Insufficient activation of CEBPD in cancer cells has been suggested to induce genomic instability [14]. The current study further supports our previous study [17] showing CEBPD serves a protumor role in tumor microenvironment. Therefore, the dual role of CEBPD in both killing and promoting cancer has led us to think more about how to apply and optimize “CEBPD reactivation” to provide a useful and safe solution when administering these chemotherapeutic drugs. The CEBPD downstream target PTX3 that we focused on here can provide a great opportunity for developing a feasible translational application for cancer therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell culture and treatment
THP-1 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Hyclone). Human lung fibroblasts (HFL1) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). HFL1 cells were cultured in Ham's F-12 Kaighn's Modification medium (Gibco). The CAF/F28 was established from a patient [45]. Mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) used in this study were isolated from individual E13.5-E14.5 embryos generated by mating Cebpd null heterozygous mice and immortalized with E1A [46]. The CAF/F28 cells, human breast cancer MB231 cells, mouse breast cancer 4T1 cells and immortalized Cebpd+/+ (7V7) and Cebpd−/− (KO5) MEFs were maintained in DMEM. All culture media were supplemented with 10% FBS, streptomycin and penicillin. To generate THP-1/M2 macrophages, THP-1 cells were treated with 320 nM PMA for 6 h and then cultured with PMA plus 20 ng/ml IL-4 and 20 ng/ml IL-13 for another 18 h [47]. To generate primary mouse M2 macrophages, mononuclear cells obtained from bone marrow were treated with 25 ng/ml M-CSF in RPMI 1640 medium with 10% FBS [48]. To generate myofibroblasts, HFL1 cells or MEFs were treated with 5 μg/ml TGF-β for 3 days. The following concentrations of peptide were used in this study: 10 μg/ml PTX3 peptide (RI37 or KT44). The anticancer drugs were then added individually for each experiment: 40 μM CDDP or 100 μM 5-FU.
Conditioned medium collection
For the loss-of function assay, conditioned medium was collected from THP-1/M2 or CAF/F28 cells infected with lentiviruses bearing shLacZ, shCEBPD or shPTX3 after 48 h. The experimental cells were further treated with or without CDDP or 5-FU for 24 h, which was replaced with serum-free RPMI medium (conditioned medium from THP-1 cells and mouse primary macrophages), 0.5% serum in F12K medium (conditioned medium from HFL1 cells) or 0.5% serum in DMEM medium (conditioned medium from CAF/F28 cells) for another 24 h. Following centrifugation, the supernatants were collected and stocked for further assays in this study. For the gain-of-function assay, conditioned medium was collected from THP-1/M2 (M2MΦ) or CAF/F28 cells 24 h after infection with lentiviruses bearing an empty vector or CEBPD expression vector. Then, the cells were prepared as described above.
Reporter plasmids and luciferase assay
The PTX3 reporter was constructed by cutting the DNA fragment of the PTX3 promoter from pGL2-basic/PTX3 [49] with KpnI and HindIII and subcloning the fragment into the pGL3-basic vector. For the reporter assay, cells were transiently transfected using the PTX3 reporter and indicated expression vectors with the TransIT-2020 transfection reagent (Mirus) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Eighteen hours following transfection, the transfectants were treated with CDDP or 5-FU for another 6 h. The lysates of experimental cells were harvested to conduct the luciferase assay.
ChIP assay
The ChIP assay was performed essentially as described by Wang et al. [50]. Briefly, following various treatments, the experimental THP-1/M2 or CAF/F28 cells were fixed with 1% formaldehyde. The cross-linked chromatin was then prepared and sonicated to an average size of 500 bp. The DNA fragments were immunoprecipitated with antibodies specific for CEBPD or control rabbit immunoglobulin G at 4 °C overnight. After reversal of the cross-links, the immunoprecipitated chromatin was amplified by primers targeting specific regions of the gene's genomic locus. The primers used detected sequences in the PTX3 genomic locus (5′-GCTCGGATTGGACTTGACTT-3′ and 5′-GAGGGAAATGTGGAAGTTGC-3′). The amplified DNA products were resolved by agarose gel electrophoresis and confirmed by sequencing.
Purification of recombinant PTX3 mutant proteins
The same primers were used for cloning and for expression in E. coli. We cloned partial full-length (19-381) coding regions of the PTX3 gene into the pFastBac vector. To generate mutant constructs by site-directed mutagenesis, we used the following primers: forward primer 5′-GCTAAAACCATCCTGTTTTCCTATG-3′ and reverse primer 5′-TAATACATCTGTGGCTTTGACCCAA-3′. Various baculoviruses containing recombinants of PTX3, including the mutant form (N220A), were produced in DH10BAC cells and then were amplified and used to infect Sf9 insect cells in serum-free media (Invitrogen). The cells were cultured in suspension and harvested 40 h after infection. The recombinant proteins were purified by nickel affinity chromatography and gel filtration chromatography.
Cell viability assay
To assess the viability of cancer stem cells in response to anticancer drugs using the MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] assay (Sigma), cancer cells were pretreated with various conditioned media as described above with PTX3 peptide as indicated in each experiment for 7 days. Then, 1×104 experimental cells were treated with CDDP or 5-FU for another 48 h. To assess the proliferation of cancer cells using the MTT assay, cancer cells were treated with PTX3 peptides as indicated in each experiment for 24 and 48 h.
Migration assays and matrigel invasion assay
For the migration assay, cells were seeded (3 × 104 for mcMB231, mcCDRMB231 and mcFURMB231 cells or 5 × 104 for mCherry fluorescent 4T1, mcCDR4T1 and mcFUR4T1 cells) in 24-well plates containing 8-μm pore inserts (BD Biosciences). For the matrigel invasion assay, the 8-μm pore inserts of the 24-well plates were pre-coated with appropriate matrigel and the same cell number as mentioned in the migration assay were seeded onto the matrigel. Serum-free conditioned medium was placed in the upper wells after cells adhered to the inserts. DMEM with 10% FBS was added to the lower wells of the 24-well plates. The cells inside the insert were wiped with cotton swabs and removed after 16 hours of incubation. The cells that had migrated to the bottom of the insert membrane were detected by DAPI. The total number of cells attached to the lower surface of the polycarbonate filter insert was counted at 200X magnification under a fluorescence microscope.
Reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
Total RNA of experimental cells was isolated using TRIzol RNA extraction reagent. For RT-PCR analysis, total RNA was subjected to reverse transcription with SuperScript III (Invitrogen). The specific oligonucleotide primers used for the RT-PCR analysis are as follows: CEBPD, 5′-GCCATGTACGACGACGAGAG-3′ and 5′-TGTGATTGCTGTTGAAGAGGTC-3′; GAPDH, 5′-CCATCACCATCTTCCAGGAG-3′ and 5′-CCTGCTTCACCACCTTCTTG-3′; and PTX3, 5′-TGTTGAGATGGCCACAGG-3′ and 5′-TCAGACCTTCCCAACTGG-3′.
Western blotting analysis
Cells were lysed in modified radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (modified RIPA) [50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, aprotinin (1 mg/ml) and leupeptin (1 mg/ml)]. Specific antibodies including α-tubulin (T6199, Sigma) and CEBPD (sc-636, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) were used for Western blotting.
Short hairpin RNA (shRNA) assay
Lentiviruses were produced from Phoenix cells that had been cotransfected with various shRNA expression vectors in combination with pMD2.G and psPAX2. After determining the viral infection efficiency, THP-1/M2 and CAF/F28 cells were infected for 48 h with shC, shD or shP lentiviruses, each at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10. The shRNA oligo sequences used in the lentiviral expression vectors were as follows: shC, 5′-CCGGTGTTCGCATTATCCGAACCATCTC GAGATGGTTCGGATAATGCGAACATTTTTG-3′; shD, 5′-CCGGGCTGTCGGCTGAGAACGAGAACT CGAGTTCTCGTTCTCAGCCGACAGCTTTTT-3′; and shP, 5′- CCGGGAGGAGCTCAGTATGTTTCATCTCGA GATGAAACATACTGAGCTCCTCTTTTTTG-3′. The lentiviral knockdown expression vectors were purchased from the National RNAi Core Facility located at the Genomic Research Center of the Institute of Molecular Biology, Academia Sinica, Taiwan.
Sphere formation assay
Cancer cells were cultured with conditioned medium as described above. Then, cells were plated in ultralow attachment plates (Corning) at a density of 5×103 cells per well. Cells were grown in serum-free DMEM/F12 (Gibco) supplemented with B27 (Invitrogen), 20 ng/mL EGF (Abcam) and 10 ng/mL bFGF (Peprotech). After two weeks, the total number of spheres was counted at 100X magnification under a microscope.
Xenograft tumor formation from spheres in NOD-SCID mice
Six-week-old female NOD-SCID mice were subcutaneously injected with spheres of breast cancer cells at low doses of 104 or 103 viable cells. Animals were sacrificed 1 month following inoculation. All experiments on mice were performed according to the guidelines of our institute (Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, National Cheng Kung University). The animal use protocol described has been reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).
Xenograft animal study
In mcCDRMB231 xenografts, 2 × 106 mcCDRMB231 cells mixed with 5 × 105 shC-M2 macrophages, 5 × 105 shD-M2 macrophages, 5 × 105 shC-CAFs or 5 × 105 shD-CAFs were inoculated subcutaneously into the dorsal rear flanks of NOD-SCID mice. In mcCDR4T1 xenografts, 1 × 106 mcCDR4T1 cells were mixed with 5 × 105 7V7 MEF-derived myofibroblasts, 5 × 105 KO5 MEF–derived myofibroblasts, 5 × 105 Cebpd+/+ bone marrow–derived M2 macrophages or 5 × 105 Cebpd−/− bone marrow–derived M2 macrophages and inoculated subcutaneously into the dorsal rear flanks of NOD-SCID mice. In in vivo experiments of mice treated with or without CDDP, beginning 1 weeks after inoculation with tumor cells, mice were treated weekly with intraperitoneal injection of CDDP (5 mg/kg) dissolved in 1% (w/v) DMSO or DMSO only. Tumor size was measured with external calipers and tumor volume was calculated using the standard formula: V = (w × l2) × 0.52, where l is the length and w is the width of the tumor. The animals were sacrificed after tumors cells had been inoculated for 5-12 weeks. The number of the metastasized tumor nodules on lung surface was quantified. All experiments on mice were performed according to the guidelines of our institute (the Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, National Cheng Kung University). The animal use protocol listed below has been reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).
Allograft animal study
6- to 8-week-old female BALB/c mice were used in this assay. One million mcCDR4T1 cells were inoculated subcutaneously into the dorsal rear flanks of BALB/c mice. In in vivo experiments of mice treated with or without CDDP, beginning 1 weeks after inoculation with tumor cells, mice were injected intraperitoneally every week with CDDP (5 mg/kg) dissolved in 1% (w/v) DMSO or DMSO only. The tumors were then subcutaneously injected with PTX3 peptides RI37 (50 μg) or KT44 (50 μg) 3 times per week. Tumor size was measured with external calipers and tumor volume was calculated using the standard formula: V = (w × l2) × 0.52, where l is the length and w is the width of the tumor. Animals were sacrificed after tumor cells had been inoculated for 6 weeks. The number of the metastasized tumor nodules on lung surface was quantified. All experiments on mice were performed according to the guidelines of our institute (the Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, National Cheng Kung University). The animal use protocol listed below has been reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL FIGURES
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grant NHRI-EX104-10422BI from the National Health Research Institutes and grant MOST103-2320-B-006-034-MY3 from the Ministry of Science and Technology.
Footnotes
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by all authors.
Editorial note
This paper has been accepted based in part on peerreview conducted by another journal and the authors' response and revisions as well as expedited peer-review in Oncotarget.
REFERENCES
- 1.Sun Y, Campisi J, Higano C, Beer TM, Porter P, Coleman I, True L, Nelson PS. Treatment-induced damage to the tumor microenvironment promotes prostate cancer therapy resistance through WNT16B. Nat Med. 2012;18:1359–1368. doi: 10.1038/nm.2890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Acharyya S, Oskarsson T, Vanharanta S, Malladi S, Kim J, Morris PG, Manova-Todorova K, Leversha M, Hogg N, Seshan VE, Norton L, Brogi E, Massague J. A CXCL1 paracrine network links cancer chemoresistance and metastasis. Cell. 2012;150:165–178. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhu Y, Knolhoff BL, Meyer MA, Nywening TM, West BL, Luo J, Wang-Gillam A, Goedegebuure SP, Linehan DC, DeNardo DG. CSF1/CSF1R blockade reprograms tumor-infiltrating macrophages and improves response to T-cell checkpoint immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer models. Cancer Res. 2014;74:5057–5069. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-3723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chen WJ, Ho CC, Chang YL, Chen HY, Lin CA, Ling TY, Yu SL, Yuan SS, Chen YJ, Lin CY, Pan SH, Chou HY, Chang GC, Chu WC, Lee YM, Lee JY, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts regulate the plasticity of lung cancer stemness via paracrine signalling. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3472. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Condeelis J, Pollard JW. Macrophages: obligate partners for tumor cell migration, invasion, and metastasis. Cell. 2006;124:263–266. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Augsten M, Sjoberg E, Frings O, Vorrink SU, Frijhoff J, Olsson E, Borg A, Ostman A. Cancer-associated fibroblasts expressing CXCL14 rely upon NOS1-derived nitric oxide signaling for their tumor-supporting properties. Cancer Res. 2014;74:2999–3010. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pollard JW. Tumour-educated macrophages promote tumour progression and metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:71–78. doi: 10.1038/nrc1256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kalluri R, Zeisberg M. Fibroblasts in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:392–401. doi: 10.1038/nrc1877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.DeNardo DG, Barreto JB, Andreu P, Vasquez L, Tawfik D, Kolhatkar N, Coussens LM. CD4(+) T cells regulate pulmonary metastasis of mammary carcinomas by enhancing protumor properties of macrophages. Cancer Cell. 2009;16:91–102. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.06.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shimoda M, Mellody KT, Orimo A. Carcinoma-associated fibroblasts are a rate-limiting determinant for tumour progression. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2010;21:19–25. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Vermeulen L, De Sousa EMF, van der Heijden M, Cameron K, de Jong JH, Borovski T, Tuynman JB, Todaro M, Merz C, Rodermond H, Sprick MR, Kemper K, Richel DJ, Stassi G, Medema JP. Wnt activity defines colon cancer stem cells and is regulated by the microenvironment. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12:468–476. doi: 10.1038/ncb2048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ji C, Chang W, Centrella M, McCarthy TL. Activation domains of CCAAT enhancer binding protein delta: regions required for native activity and prostaglandin E2-dependent transactivation of insulin-like growth factor I gene expression in rat osteoblasts. Mol Endocrinol. 2003;17:1834–1843. doi: 10.1210/me.2002-0235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Okazaki K, Li J, Yu H, Fukui N, Sandell LJ. CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteins beta and delta mediate the repression of gene transcription of cartilage-derived retinoic acid-sensitive protein induced by interleukin-1 beta. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:31526–31533. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M202815200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wu SR, Li CF, Hung LY, Huang AM, Tseng JT, Tsou JH, Wang JM. CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein delta mediates tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced Aurora kinase C transcription and promotes genomic instability. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:28662–28670. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.270710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Balamurugan K, Sterneck E. The many faces of C/EBPdelta and their relevance for inflammation and cancer. Int J Biol Sci. 2013;9:917–933. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.7224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sato Y, Nishio Y, Sekine O, Kodama K, Nagai Y, Nakamura T, Maegawa H, Kashiwagi A. Increased expression of CCAAT/enhancer binding protein-beta and -delta and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 genes in aortas from hyperinsulinaemic rats. Diabetologia. 2007;50:481–489. doi: 10.1007/s00125-006-0480-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hsiao YW, Li CF, Chi JY, Tseng JT, Chang Y, Hsu LJ, Lee CH, Chang TH, Wang SM, Wang DD, Cheng HC, Wang JM. CCAAT/enhancer binding protein delta in macrophages contributes to immunosuppression and inhibits phagocytosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Sci Signal. 2013;6:ra59. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2003648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ko CY, Hsu HC, Shen MR, Chang WC, Wang JM. Epigenetic silencing of CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein delta activity by YY1/polycomb group/DNA methyltransferase complex. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:30919–30932. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M804029200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Balamurugan K, Wang JM, Tsai HH, Sharan S, Anver M, Leighty R, Sterneck E. The tumour suppressor C/EBPdelta inhibits FBXW7 expression and promotes mammary tumour metastasis. EMBO J. 2010;29:4106–4117. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2010.280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Garlanda C, Bottazzi B, Bastone A, Mantovani A. Pentraxins at the crossroads between innate immunity, inflammation, matrix deposition, and female fertility. Annu Rev Immunol. 2005;23:337–366. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Presta M, Camozzi M, Salvatori G, Rusnati M. Role of the soluble pattern recognition receptor PTX3 in vascular biology. J Cell Mol Med. 2007;11:723–738. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00061.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Altmeyer A, Klampfer L, Goodman AR, Vilcek J. Promoter structure and transcriptional activation of the murine TSG-14 gene encoding a tumor necrosis factor/interleukin-1-inducible pentraxin protein. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:25584–25590. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.43.25584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Inforzato A, Reading PC, Barbati E, Bottazzi B, Garlanda C, Mantovani A. The “sweet” side of a long pentraxin: how glycosylation affects PTX3 functions in innate immunity and inflammation. Front Immunol. 2012;3:407. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Inforzato A, Rivieccio V, Morreale AP, Bastone A, Salustri A, Scarchilli L, Verdoliva A, Vincenti S, Gallo G, Chiapparino C, Pacello L, Nucera E, Serlupi-Crescenzi O, Day AJ, Bottazzi B, Mantovani A, et al. Structural characterization of PTX3 disulfide bond network and its multimeric status in cumulus matrix organization. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:10147–10161. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M708535200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Falasca M BF, Catapano AL, Norata GD. The Long Pentraxin PTX3: A Biomarker Spanning From Cardiovascular Disorders to Cancer. J Mol Biomark Diagn. 2013;4:1–3. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Stallone G, Cormio L, Netti GS, Infante B, Selvaggio O, Fino GD, Ranieri E, Bruno F, Prattichizzo C, Sanguedolce F, Tortorella S, Bufo P, Grandaliano G, Carrieri G. Pentraxin 3: a novel biomarker for predicting progression from prostatic inflammation to prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2014;74:4230–4238. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Germano G, Frapolli R, Simone M, Tavecchio M, Erba E, Pesce S, Pasqualini F, Grosso F, Sanfilippo R, Casali PG, Gronchi A, Virdis E, Tarantino E, Pilotti S, Greco A, Nebuloni M, et al. Antitumor and anti-inflammatory effects of trabectedin on human myxoid liposarcoma cells. Cancer Res. 2010;70:2235–2244. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.DeNardo DG, Brennan DJ, Rexhepaj E, Ruffell B, Shiao SL, Madden SF, Gallagher WM, Wadhwani N, Keil SD, Junaid SA, Rugo HS, Hwang ES, Jirstrom K, West BL, Coussens LM. Leukocyte complexity predicts breast cancer survival and functionally regulates response to chemotherapy. Cancer Discov. 2011;1:54–67. doi: 10.1158/2159-8274.CD-10-0028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Shree T, Olson OC, Elie BT, Kester JC, Garfall AL, Simpson K, Bell-McGuinn KM, Zabor EC, Brogi E, Joyce JA. Macrophages and cathepsin proteases blunt chemotherapeutic response in breast cancer. Genes Dev. 2011;25:2465–2479. doi: 10.1101/gad.180331.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gilbert LA, Hemann MT. DNA damage-mediated induction of a chemoresistant niche. Cell. 2010;143:355–366. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lotti F, Jarrar AM, Pai RK, Hitomi M, Lathia J, Mace A, Gantt GA, Jr, Sukhdeo K, DeVecchio J, Vasanji A, Leahy P, Hjelmeland AB, Kalady MF, Rich JN. Chemotherapy activates cancer-associated fibroblasts to maintain colorectal cancer-initiating cells by IL-17A. J Exp Med. 2013;210:2851–2872. doi: 10.1084/jem.20131195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Deban L, Russo RC, Sironi M, Moalli F, Scanziani M, Zambelli V, Cuccovillo I, Bastone A, Gobbi M, Valentino S, Doni A, Garlanda C, Danese S, Salvatori G, Sassano M, Evangelista V, et al. Regulation of leukocyte recruitment by the long pentraxin PTX3. Nat Immunol. 2010;11:328–334. doi: 10.1038/ni.1854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chang LH, Huang HS, Wu PT, Jou IM, Pan MH, Chang WC, Wang DD, Wang JM. Role of macrophage CCAAT/enhancer binding protein delta in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis in collagen-induced arthritic mice. PLoS One. 2012;7:e45378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Banerjee S, Xie N, Cui H, Tan Z, Yang S, Icyuz M, Abraham E, Liu G. MicroRNA let-7c regulates macrophage polarization. J Immunol. 2013;190:6542–6549. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Weinstein PS, Skinner M, Sipe JD, Lokich JJ, Zamcheck N, Cohen AS. Acute-phase proteins or tumour markers: the role of SAA, SAP, CRP and CEA as indicators of metastasis in a broad spectrum of neoplastic diseases. Scand J Immunol. 1984;19:193–198. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1984.tb00919.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yang J, Wezeman M, Zhang X, Lin P, Wang M, Qian J, Wan B, Kwak LW, Yu L, Yi Q. Human C-reactive protein binds activating Fcgamma receptors and protects myeloma tumor cells from apoptosis. Cancer Cell. 2007;12:252–265. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.de la Torre M, Heldin P, Bergh J. Expression of the CD44 glycoprotein (lymphocyte-homing receptor) in untreated human breast cancer and its relationship to prognostic markers. Anticancer Res. 1995;15:2791–2795. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sheridan C, Kishimoto H, Fuchs RK, Mehrotra S, Bhat-Nakshatri P, Turner CH, Goulet R, Jr, Badve S, Nakshatri H. CD44+/CD24- breast cancer cells exhibit enhanced invasive properties: an early step necessary for metastasis. Breast Cancer Res. 2006;8:R59. doi: 10.1186/bcr1610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Russell DL, Robker RL. Molecular mechanisms of ovulation: co-ordination through the cumulus complex. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13:289–312. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dml062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ronca R, Di Salle E, Giacomini A, Leali D, Alessi P, Coltrini D, Ravelli C, Matarazzo S, Ribatti D, Vermi W, Presta M. Long pentraxin-3 inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition in melanoma cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013;12:2760–2771. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ronca R, Alessi P, Coltrini D, Di Salle E, Giacomini A, Leali D, Corsini M, Belleri M, Tobia C, Garlanda C, Bonomi E, Tardanico R, Vermi W, Presta M. Long pentraxin-3 as an epithelial-stromal fibroblast growth factor-targeting inhibitor in prostate cancer. J Pathol. 2013;230:228–238. doi: 10.1002/path.4181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pan YC, Li CF, Ko CY, Pan MH, Chen PJ, Tseng JT, Wu WC, Chang WC, Huang AM, Sterneck E, Wang JM. CEBPD reverses RB/E2F1-mediated gene repression and participates in HMDB-induced apoptosis of cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:5770–5780. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sivko GS, DeWille JW. CCAAT/Enhancer binding protein delta (c/EBPdelta) regulation and expression in human mammary epithelial cells: I. “Loss of function” alterations in the c/EBPdelta growth inhibitory pathway in breast cancer cell lines. J Cell Biochem. 2004;93:830–843. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Tang D, Sivko GS, DeWille JW. Promoter methylation reduces C/EBPdelta (CEBPD) gene expression in the SUM-52PE human breast cancer cell line and in primary breast tumors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;95:161–170. doi: 10.1007/s10549-005-9061-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lin ZY, Chuang YH, Chuang WL. Cancer-associated fibroblasts up-regulate CCL2, CCL26, IL6 and LOXL2 genes related to promotion of cancer progression in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Biomed Pharmacother. 2012;66:525–529. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2012.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tessarollo L. Manipulating mouse embryonic stem cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2001;158:47–63. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-220-1:47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Tjiu JW, Chen JS, Shun CT, Lin SJ, Liao YH, Chu CY, Tsai TF, Chiu HC, Dai YS, Inoue H, Yang PC, Kuo ML, Jee SH. Tumor-associated macrophage-induced invasion and angiogenesis of human basal cell carcinoma cells by cyclooxygenase-2 induction. J Invest Dermatol. 2009;129:1016–1025. doi: 10.1038/jid.2008.310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lu YC, Kim I, Lye E, Shen F, Suzuki N, Suzuki S, Gerondakis S, Akira S, Gaffen SL, Yeh WC, Ohashi PS. Differential role for c-Rel and C/EBPbeta/delta in TLR-mediated induction of proinflammatory cytokines. J Immunol. 2009;182:7212–7221. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0802971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ko CY, Chang LH, Lee YC, Sterneck E, Cheng CP, Chen SH, Huang AM, Tseng JT, Wang JM. CCAAT/enhancer binding protein delta (CEBPD) elevating PTX3 expression inhibits macrophage-mediated phagocytosis of dying neuron cells. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33:422. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.09.017. e411-425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wang JM, Ko CY, Chen LC, Wang WL, Chang WC. Functional role of NF-IL6beta and its sumoylation and acetylation modifications in promoter activation of cyclooxygenase 2 gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:217–231. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.