Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 4.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):480–482. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.5641

In vivo biomechanical mapping of normal and keratoconic corneas

Giuliano Scarcelli 1,2,*, Sebastien Besner 1,2, Roberto Pineda 3, Patricia Kalout 3, Seok Hyun Yun 1,2,
PMCID: PMC4698984  NIHMSID: NIHMS746741  PMID: 25611213

INTRODUCTION

Corneal mechanical strength is critical to withstanding intraocular pressure and maintaining normal shape1,2. In keratoconus, the mechanical stability is compromised3, and this may lead to progressive morphological changes. Therefore, a noninvasive technique capable of accurately measuring the mechanical properties of the cornea may help understand the mechanism of keratoconus development and improve detection and intervention in keratoconus. We have previously developed Brillouin microscopy based on light scattering from inherent acoustic waves in tissues4 and shown that this technique can provide quantitative estimates of local longitudinal modulus5, which correlate to the Young's/shear moduli of the cornea2,6. Using a clinically viable instrument, for the first time to our knowledge, here we mapped the elastic modulus of normal and keratoconus patients in vivo. We found distinctive biomechanical features that differentiate normal and keratoconic corneas and, therefore, have potential to serve as diagnostic metrics for keratoconus.

METHODS

The study recruited six healthy volunteers (Age=37±15) and five patients with advanced keratoconus (Age=43±7). All participants signed an informed consent form approved by the Partners Human Research Committee (IRB), in accordance with the principles embodied in the Declaration of Helsinki. We constructed a laser-scanning confocal Brillouin microscope (wavelength: 780 nm, power: 1.5 mW, lateral/axial resolution: 5 μm/30 μm, sensitivity ~10 MHz). The instrument was equipped with wide field-of-view imaging to allow real-time pupil detection and beam positioning (lateral accuracy <0.5 mm). For healthy subjects, about 5 mm by 5 mm areas in the central region of the cornea were scanned. For keratoconus patients, similar regions, but including the center of the cone, were scanned as confirmed by their tomography images (Pentacam, Oculus). To construct Brillouin maps, axial scans were taken at various transverse locations; the anterior mean Brillouin shift was computed from each axial scan by averaging the measured Brillouin shift values over the anterior portion of the corneal stroma; a color-coded elasticity map was obtained by two-dimensional interpolation of mean Brillouin shift in the anterior portion.

RESULTS

Normal corneas were found to have relatively uniform anterior Brillouin shifts in the central region (Fig. 1a). By contrast, keratoconic corneas presented strong spatial variations of Brillouin shifts (Fig. 1b). Figure 2 shows the average anterior Brillouin shifts of normal corneas (N=7) and of keratoconus corneas (N=6) in the cone region (<1 mm from thinnest point) and outside the cone region (> 3 mm away from thinnest point). A highly statistically significant decrease (unpaired t-test, p<0.005) was found in the keratoconic cone region with respect to normal corneas. Also, a highly statistically significant difference (unpaired t-test, p<0.005) was observed between the cone and outside-cone regions. The regions outside the cone showed no statistically significant difference compared to the normal corneas.

Fig. 1. Brillouin elasticity maps.

Fig. 1

Representative maps of the mean anterior Brillouin shift for (a) a 53-year-old healthy subject and (b) a 40-year-old patient with advanced keratoconus. Insets are the respective curvature and pachymetry maps with outlined Brillouin scanned areas.

Fig. 2. Focal weakening in keratoconus.

Fig. 2

The mean Brillouin shifts of the keratoconic corneas (N=6) in the cone region versus outside-the-cone region, in comparison to average normal cornea values (N=7). ***, P <0.005; n.s., not statistically significant difference.

DISCUSSION

We have reported the distribution of elastic modulus within keratoconic and normal corneas in vivo. The elasticity maps show remarkable spatial variations around the cone. The reduction of 100 MHz in the keratoconic cone region (Fig. 2) corresponds to a ~3% decrease in longitudinal modulus and about ~70% reduction in shear modulus5. The regions away from the cone in the keratoconus corneas have similar Brillouin shifts as normal corneas, which is consistent with our ex vivo data5. This finding supports the long-standing hypothesis that keratoconus involves a spatially-localized mechanical alteration in the cornea1. Importantly, it emphasizes the need for spatially resolved measurements for accurate analysis of the biomechanical anomalies in keratoconus. Future research is warranted to understand the relationship between the focal or heterogeneous mechanical weakening and morphological changes (i.e. thinning and steepening) and to develop biomechanics-based metrics for improved diagnosis and prognosis of keratoconus, screening of at-risk subjects for post-LASIK ectasia, and monitoring the effects of corneal collagen crosslinking.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported in part by the Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (NIH UL1-RR025758), American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, National Institutes of Health (P41-EB015903, R21EY023043, K25EB015885), and Human Frontier Science Program.

Footnotes

Authors’ contributions: GS, RP, SY designed the research. SB constructed the instrument and obtained data. GS, SB, PK analyzed the data. GS, SB, SY wrote the manuscript with input from all the authors.

Conflict of interest disclosures: None.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Roberts CJ, Dupps WJ., Jr. Biomechanics of Corneal Ectasia and Biomechanical Treatments. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2014;40:991–998. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.04.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Muller LJ, Pels E, Vrensen G. The specific architecture of the anterior stroma accounts for maintenance of corneal curvature. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2001;85:437–443. doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.4.437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Meek K, et al. Changes in collagen orientation and distribution in keratoconus corneas. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2005;46:1948–2004. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-1253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Scarcelli G, Yun SH. In vivo Brillouin optical microscopy of the human eye. Optics Express. 2012;20:9197. doi: 10.1364/OE.20.009197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Scarcelli G, Besner S, Pineda R, Yun SH. Biomechanical characterization of keratoconus corneas ex vivo with Brillouin microscopy. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2014;55:4490–4495. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Randleman JB, Dawson DG, Grossniklaus HE, McCarey BE, Edelhauser HE. Depth-dependent cohesive tensile strength in human donor corneas: Implications for refractive surgery. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2008;24:85–89. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20080101-15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES