Abstract
Experimental in vitro and in vivo studies support the hypothesis that heat-treated, lyophilized Lactobacillus acidophilus LB cells and concentrated, neutralized spent culture medium conserve the variety of pharmacological, antimicrobial activities of the live probiotic strain against several infectious agents involved in well-established acute and persistent watery diarrhoea and gastritis. Heat-treated cells and heat-stable secreted molecules trigger multiple strain-specific activities explaining the therapeutic efficacy of L. acidophilus LB. This review discusses the current body of knowledge on the antimicrobial mechanisms of action exerted by L. acidophilus LB demonstrated in in vitro and in vivo experimental studies, and the evidence for the therapeutic efficacy of this anti-infectious biotherapeutic agent proved in randomized clinical trials for the treatment of acute and persistent watery diarrhoea associated with several intestinal infectious diseases in humans.
Keywords: antibacterial, biotherapeutic, diarrhoea, enterovirulent Escherichia coli, gastroenteritis, Lactobacillus, Lactobacillus acidophilus LB, pharmabiotic, probiotic, Salmonella
Introduction
The patented Lactobacillus acidophilus strain LB (L. acidophilus LB) [Servin et al. 1999; Chauviere et al. 2005; Servin et al. 2006] is the major component of a gastrointestinal anti-infectious biotherapeutic pharmaceutical product consisting of a combination of lyophilized, heat-treated Lactobacillus LB cells and concentrated, neutralized spent culture medium. The heat-treated L. acidophilus LB cannot be considered to be probiotic [Sanders et al. 2007], but is of interest since the pharmacological activities of the parental probiotic live strain are conserved.
Anti-infectious activities of human intestinal microbiota Lactobacillus
At the beginning of the 20th century, Elie Metchnikoff, the Russian-born Nobel Prize winner who worked at the Pasteur Institute in Paris, reported the first observation of the positive role played by some selected bacteria from the human intestinal flora and suggested that: ‘The dependence of the intestinal microbes on food makes it possible to adopt measures to modify the flora in our bodies and to replace the harmful microbes by useful microbes’ [Metchnikoff, 1907].
In 2001, an expert consultation of international scientists working on behalf of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO) defined probiotics as follows: ‘live microorganisms which, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host’ [FAO/WHO, 2001, 2002]. This definition has become the most widely adopted and accepted version worldwide, and a consensus meeting of the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) recently refined the appropriate use and scope of the term ‘probiotic’ [Hill et al. 2014].
A given effect of a probiotic strain is strain-specific and cannot be extrapolated to other strains of the same genus or even to other strains belonging to the same species and sub-species [FAO/WHO, 2001; WGO, 2012; Hill et al. 2014; Liévin-Le Moal and Servin, 2014]. The main well-described Lactobacillus strains of human intestinal microbiota origin used to treat human gastrointestinal infectious disorders are L. rhamnosus strain [Segers and Lebeer, 2014], L. casei strain Shirota YIT9029, L. acidophilus strain LB, L. johnsonii NCC 533, L. casei DN-114 001 and L. reuteri DSM 17938. Antimicrobial activities of these strains have been demonstrated in a comprehensive set of in vitro and in vivo experiments revealing the involvement of their cell-associated components and secreted molecules [Lebeer et al. 2008, 2010; Gareau et al. 2010; Kleerebezem et al. 2010; van Baarlen et al. 2013; Liévin-Le Moal and Servin, 2014]. In addition, well-designed and well-conducted randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated their therapeutic efficacies against infectious acute watery diarrhoea and antibiotic-associated diarrhoea [Verna and Lucak, 2010; Yan and Polk, 2012; Liévin-Le Moal and Servin, 2014; Vandenplas et al. 2015].
Several lactic acid producing and non-lactic acid producing probiotic strains have been classified as ‘live biotherapeutics’ with a therapeutic effect and these are intended for clinical use according to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [Hoffman, 2008; Sutton, 2008] and the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Haepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) [Szajewska et al. 2014a]. Recommendations graded from A to B for the clinical use of probiotics in necrotizing enterocolitis, childhood diarrhoea, inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, antibiotic-associated diarrhoea and C. difficile-induced diarrhoea were published following a Yale University Workshop in 2005 [Floch et al. 2006]; an ‘A’ recommendation was made for strong positive, well-conducted RCTs; a ‘B’ recommendation for RCTs that did not reach ‘A’ level because of some negative studies or a limited number of studies; and a ‘C’ recommendation for RCTs that were significant but failed to receive stronger ratings because of the size of the reported patient studies, and also the factors that limited categories to ‘B’. The probiotic L. rhamnosus GG [<1010 colony-forming units (CFU)/day, typically 5–7 days] and L. reuteri (108 to 4 × 108 CFU/day, typically 5–7 days) strains have received an ‘A’ recommendation on the basis of strong positive, well-conducted RCTs [Floch et al. 2006; Szajewska et al. 2014a].
Historical perspectives
L. acidophilus strain LB (Lactobacillus Boucard) was isolated from the stool of a healthy human by Dr Pierre Boucard in 1907. A pharmaceutical company (Laboratoire du Lactéol, France) was founded to manufacture L. acidophilus strain LB for the development of the antidiarrheal drug called Lactéol®, first used in France and then worldwide. Originally, two pharmaceutical forms existed: a tablet form containing heat-treated (110°C, 1 hour) L. acidophilus LB cells alone (1907) and a glass ampoule form containing the complete heat-treated L. acidophilus LB culture (110°C, 1 hour) (1928). The L. acidophilus LB culture has now been molecularly identified as a culture containing L. fermentum (L. fermentum LB-f) (CNCM I-2998) [Chauviere et al. 2005; Servin et al. 2006] and L. delbrueki (L. delbrueki LB-d) (CNCM I-4831) strains with a ratio of 95:5, respectively, when cultured in both laboratory conditions and industrial batches. The adult capsule (1978) and sachet (1988) pharmaceutical forms consist of a combination of 10 billion lyophilised, heat-treated Lactobacillus LB cells (L. fermentum LB-f and L. delbrueki LB-d) and 160 mg of concentrated, neutralized spent culture medium. Three AMMs (Autorisations de mise sur le marché) (1978, 1988, 2000) for the antidiarrheal heat-treated and lyophilized L. acidophilus LB cells and concentrated neutralized spent culture medium have been given by the French National Agency for the Safety of Medicine and Health Products (Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé) with the therapeutic indication for the symptomatic treatment of diarrhoea in addition to rehydration by oral rehydration solution (ORS) or intravenously in infants and children under 6 years of age, and in addition to rehydration and/or dietary measures in adults and children over 6 years.
Live L. acidophilus LB (L. fermentum LB-f and L. delbrueckii LB-d) meet several criteria defined for probiotic strains including the history, phenotypic and genotypic characterization of the strains, and the depositing of the two constitutive L. fermentum LB-f and L. delbrueki LB-d strains into a qualified cell-bank system [FAO/WHO, 2001, 2002; Hill et al. 2014]. The heat-treated and lyophilized L. acidophilus LB cells and culture medium meet the criteria defined for the therapeutic use of a biotherapeutic agent, i.e. the step-by-step description of the manufacturing process which is carried out under aseptic conditions, and the quality control process including the process input parameters and the expected output results which ensure that the product remains stable and that the biotherapeutic agent remains pharmacologically active over the indicated conservation time.
In vitro and animal studies have provided useful background information on the pharmacological antibacterial effects of the live or heat-treated L. acidophilus LB culture. Several mechanisms of action have been identified as directly directed against human gastroenterovirulent bacteria or directed against the mechanisms of pathogenesis of these bacterial pathogens that promote dramatic structural injuries at the gastrointestinal epithelial barrier accompanied by dysfunctions that caused the acute and persistent diarrhoeal diseases in children and adults.
The goal of this review is to analyse the reported experimental in vitro and in vivo data that show the antagonistic activities against gastroenterovirulent bacterial pathogens exerted by the live or heat-treated L. acidophilus LB culture, the L. fermentum strain LB-f (the major strain of the L. acidophilus LB culture) and the rehydrated powder of the pharmaceutical capsule form. Moreover, the review describes and analyses the results obtained in non-RCTs and RCTs that demonstrate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of heat-treated and lyophilized L. acidophilus LB cells and culture medium in the treatment of some gastrointestinal infectious diseases.
Antibiotic-like activity
Secreted molecules present in Lactobacillus LB culture exert a time-dependent killing activity against major enterovirulent bacteria such as Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium (S. typhimurium), Listeria monocytogenes, Shigella flexneri, Yersinia enterocolitica, enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, enteropathogenic E. coli and diarrhoea-associated diffusely adhering E. coli (DAEC) expressing Afa/Dr adhesins [Coconnier et al. 1997, 2000; Liévin-Le Moal et al. 2002; Coconnier-Polter et al. 2005] and gastritis-associated Helicobacter pylori [Coconnier et al. 1998] (Table 1). A bactericidal level of activity has been reached against S. flexneri, L. monocytogenes, S. typhimurium and H. pylori after 2–3 hours of direct contact. Enterovirulent E. coli is less sensitive to the killing activity of secreted molecules of Lactobacillus LB. As shown in Figure 1a, a bactericidal level of activity is exerted against the S. typhimurium strain SL1344 by untreated and heat-treated secreted molecules of Lactobacillus LB [Coconnier et al. 1997] and L. fermentum strain LB-f, and by heat-stable secreted molecules present in the supernatant of the rehydrated powder of the pharmaceutical capsule form. After treatment observation of S. typhimurium by transmission electron microscopy shows an altered cell surface without affecting the expression of flagella [Coconnier et al. 1997; Liévin-Le Moal et al. 2011]. This induced S. typhimurium SL1344 cell death was preceded by a loss of intracellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP), a release of lipopolysaccharide, and an increase in membrane permeability [Coconnier-Polter et al. 2005].
Table 1.
Overview of experimental in vitro and in vivo antibacterial effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus LB (L. fermentum LB-f + L. delbrueki LB-d) against specific gastroenterovirulent bacterial pathogens.
| Pathogen | Experimental conditions | Observed effects | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bactericidal activity | |||
| Shigella, Listeria, and enterovirulent Escherichia coli (ETEC, EPEC, Afa/Dr DAEC) | Direct contact between pathogens and L. acidophilus LB-CFCS | Bactericidal effect | Coconnier et al. [1997], Liévin-Le Moal et al. [2002] |
| Salmonella typhimurium | Direct contact between pathogen and L. acidophilus LB-CFCS | Identical bactericidal effect triggered by heat-stable and trypsin-sensitive secreted low molecular weight molecule(s). Permeabilization of bacterial membrane leads to the release of intracellular ATP and physical membrane damages are accompanied by loss of LPS | Coconnier et al. [1997] Coconnier-Polter et al. [2005] |
| Helicobacter pylori | Direct contact between pathogen and L. acidophilus LB-CFCS | Bactericidal effect and formation of coccoid forms of dead H. pylori | Coconnier et al. [1998] |
| Antagonistic activities against identified bacterial virulence factors | |||
| Enterovirulent E. coli (ETEC) | Orally administered rehydrated powder of pharmaceutical form (heat-treated and lyophilized L. acidophilus LB cells and culture medium) in suckling mice | Inhibition of E. coli enterotoxin(s)-induced death | Fourniat et al. [1986] |
| Enterovirulent E. coli (Afa/Dr DAEC) | Infection of cultured human enterocyte-like Caco-2/TC7 cells in the presence of sub-bactericidal concentration of L. acidophilus LB-CFCS | Inhibition of the adhesin F1845-dependent binding onto the brush border membrane-associated receptors of this adhesin, i.e. the decay-accelerating factor and members of the human carcinoembryonic-antigen-related cell-adhesion molecule family | Liévin-Le Moal et al. [2002] |
| Enterovirulent E. coli (Afa/Dr DAEC) | Infection of cultured human enterocyte-like Caco-2/TC7 cells in the presence of sub-bactericidal concentration of L. acidophilus LB-CFCS | Inhibition of the adhesin F1845-triggered, signalling-dependent disassembly of the brush border F-actin cytoskeleton accompanied by a conserved expression at the brush border of functional sucrase–isomaltase, lactase, amino-peptidase N, dipeptidylpeptidase IV, alkaline phosphatase and hexose transporter GLUT5 | Liévin-Le Moal et al. [2002] |
| Enterovirulent E. coli (Afa/Dr DAEC) | Infection of cultured human enterocyte-like Caco-2/TC7 cells with a recombinant E. coli secreting Sat in the presence of L. acidophilus LB culture, L. acidophilus LB-CFCS or CFCS of rehydrated powder of pharmaceutical form (heat-treated and lyophilized L. acidophilus LB cells and culture medium) | Identical inhibition of Sat toxin activity | Liévin-Le Moal et al. [2007] |
| S. typhimurium | Infection of cultured human enterocyte-like Caco-2/TC7 cells with L. acidophilus LB-CFCS-treated pathogen | Inhibition of flagella-induced pro-inflammatory response | Coconnier et al. [2000] |
| S. typhimurium | Direct contact between pathogen and untreated or heat-treated L. acidophilus LB-CFCS before infection of enterocyte-like Caco-2/TC7 cells | Identical inhibition of flagella-induced swimming motility | Liévin-Le Moal et al. [2011] |
| H. pylori | Direct contact between pathogen and L. acidophilus LB-CFCS. L. acidophilus LB-CFCS treatment of H. pylori-infected cultured human mucus-secreting intestinal HT29-MTX cells, and H. felis infecting the stomachs of mice | Inhibition of urease activity | Coconnier et al. [1998] |
| Antagonistic activities at the mucosal level | |||
| Campylobacter jejuni | Orally administered rehydrated powder of pharmaceutical form (heat-treated and lyophilized L. acidophilus LB cells and culture medium) in infected axenic mice | Decrease of mucosa-associated pathogen and pathogen intestinal translocation | Moyen et al. [1986] |
| Listeria, Shigella, Yersinia | Infection of cultured human nonintestinal HeLa or enterocyte-like Caco-2 cells in the presence or not in the presence of untreated or heat-treated L. acidophilus LB culture | Identical competitive inhibition of cell-association of pathogens accompanied by a decreased cell-internalization of pathogens | Coconnier et al. [1993a, 1993b], Liévin-Le Moal et al. [2002] |
| Enterovirulent E. coli (ETEC, EPEC, Afa/Dr DAEC) | Infection of cultured human nonintestinal HeLa or enterocyte-like Caco-2 cells in the presence or not in the presence of untreated or heat-treated L. acidophilus LB culture, or untreated or heat-treated L. acidophilus LB-CFCS | Identical competitive inhibition of pathogens cell-association | Chauviere et al. [1992a], Fourniat et al. [1992], Coconnier et al. [1993a] Coconnier et al. [1993b], Liévin-Le Moal et al. [2002] |
| Enterovirulent E. coli (Afa/Dr DAEC) | Infection of cultured human enterocyte-like Caco-2/TC7 cells in the presence of L. acidophilus LB-CFCS at a sub-bactericidal concentration | Maintenance of F-actin cytoskeleton playing a pivotal role in the structural organization of microvilli at the brush border and protection of expression and activities of brush border-associated functional sucrase–isomaltase, dipeptidylpeptidase IV, alkaline phosphatase, and fructose transporter GLUT5 | Liévin-Le Moal et al. [2002] |
| Enterovirulent E. coli (Afa/Dr DAEC) | Infection of cultured human enterocyte-like Caco-2/TC7 cells with a recombinant E. coli secreting Sat in the presence of L. acidophilus LB culture, L. acidophilus LB-CFCS or CFCS of rehydrated powder of pharmaceutical form (heat-treated and lyophilized L. acidophilus LB cells and culture medium) | Identical concentration-dependent inhibitory effect against the Sat toxin-induced increase in transepithelial passage of fluid | Liévin-Le Moal et al. [2007] |
| S. typhimurium | Infection of cultured human enterocyte-like Caco-2 cells in the presence of L. acidophilus LB culture or L. acidophilus LB-CFCS | Identical inhibition of pathogen cell association and cell entry. | Coconnier et al. [1993a, 1993b, 1998] |
| S. typhimurium | Infection of cultured human enterocyte-like Caco-2 or Caco-2/TC7 cells with L. acidophilus LB-CFCS- or antibiotic-treated pathogen | Inhibition of pathogen cell-association and cell-entry by LB-CFCS. Lack of inhibition after gentamicin, cephalothin, tetracycline or amoxicillin–clavulanic acid treatment | Coconnier et al. [1997, 1998, 2000], Coconnier-Polter et al. [2005] |
| S. typhimurium | Treatment of infected cultured human enterocyte-like Caco-2 or Caco-2/TC7 cells with L. acidophilus LB-CFCS | Bactericidal effect of LB-CFCS against the internalized pathogen localizing within intracellular vacuoles. Lack of bactericidal effect after gentamicin, cephalothin, tetracycline or amoxicillin–clavulanic acid treatments | Coconnier et al. [2000] |
| S. typhimurium | Infection of cultured human enterocyte-like Caco-2/TC7 cells with L. acidophilus LB-CFCS-treated pathogen | Inhibition of pro-inflammatory interleukin 8 cytokine production | Coconnier et al. [2000] |
| S. typhimurium | Direct contact between pathogen and untreated or heat-treated L. acidophilus -CFCS before infection of enterocyte-like Caco-2/TC7 cells | Identical delayed pathogen cell-association and cell-entry resulting from a reversible inhibition of flagella-triggered swimming motility | Liévin-Le Moal et al. [2011] |
| S. typhimurium | Orally administered L. acidophilus LB culture in infected conventional mice | Decrease of faecal excretion of live pathogen | Coconnier et al. [1997] |
| H. pylori | Treatment of H. pylori-infected cultured human mucus-secreting intestinal HT29-MTX cells with L. acidophilus LB-CFCS | Bactericidal effect against cell-associated pathogen. | Coconnier et al. [1998] |
| H. pylori | Infection of cultured human mucus-secreting intestinal HT29-MTX cells with L. acidophilus LB-CFCS-treated H. pylori | Inhibition of cell-association of pathogen | Coconnier et al. [1998] |
| H. felis | Orally administered L. acidophilus LB-CFCS in infected conventional mice | Decrease of pathogen stomach colonization and urease activity of mucosa-associated pathogen. Disappearance of the pathogen-induced gastritis | Coconnier et al. [1998] |
ATP, adenosine triphosphate; CFCS, cell-free culture supernatant; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; Sat, secreted auto transporter.
Figure 1.
Bactericidal effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus LB (L. fermentum LB-f + L. delbrueki LB-d) on enterovirulent pathogens. (A) Time course of the bactericidal effect by direct contact against S. typhimurium strain SL1344. (B), Time course of the bactericidal effect against a diarrhoea-associated diffusely adhering E. coli strain C1845 adhering onto the brush border of cultured human enterocyte-like Caco-2/TC7 cells.
The drawings to the left indicate the intestinal localization of the bactericidal effect reported in (A) and (B).
CFCS; cell-free culture supernatant; CFU, colony-forming unit.
The bactericidal activity of Lactobacillus LB was sensitive for a small part to trypsin treatment and disappears after dialysis (molecular mass cutoff, 1000 Da), indicating the involvement of heat-stable and small nonproteinaceous secreted molecules [Coconnier et al. 1997]. In addition, bactericidal activity against H. pylori, the numerically dominant gastric microorganism associated with gastritis, and an increased risk of noncardia gastric adenocarcinoma, gastric lymphoma, and peptic ulcer [Cover and Blaser, 2009] has been observed exerted by secreted molecules of Lactobacillus LB, resulting in a dramatic alteration of the normal helical morphology of the pathogen and the appearance of a U-shaped form considered as a pre-coccoid death form [Coconnier et al. 1998]. This bactericidal activity resembles the morphological changes observed after the treatment of H. pylori with antibiotics used in the classical anti H. pylori triple therapy.
Antagonistic effects against activities of bacterial virulence factors
Enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) are a main cause of diarrhoea in young children under 5 years of age in developing countries and also in adult travellers visiting endemic areas. By way of their heat-stable and heat-sensitive toxins, ETEC produce a cholera-like, watery diarrhoeal disease [Isidean et al. 2011]. In suckling mice infected with the enterotoxigenic E coli strain B41 which induces a toxin-triggered mouse death, administration of the rehydrated powder of the pharmaceutical form results in a significant increase in mouse survival [Fourniat et al. 1986] (Table 1).
Secreted molecules of Lactobacillus LB at a sub-bactericidal concentration promote a decrease in the attachment of diarrhoea-associated Afa/Dr DAEC strain C1845 at the brush border of enterocyte-like Caco-2 cells [Liévin-Le Moal et al. 2002], indicating an activity at the level of the interaction between the F1848 bacterial adhesin and the brush border membrane-associated receptors of this adhesin, i.e. the decay-accelerating factor and members of the human carcinoembryonic-antigen-related cell-adhesion molecule family [Servin, 2014] (Table 1).
The S. typhimurium cells swim onto the intestinal content to cross the mucus layer and the swimming motility facilitates the interaction of the pathogen with the brush border of enterocytes lining the intestinal epithelial barrier [Fabrega and Vila, 2013]. Secreted molecules of Lactobacillus LB at a sub-bactericidal concentration transiently impair the functionality of S. typhimurium SL1344 flagella without affecting the flagella expression [Liévin-Le Moal et al. 2011] (Table 1). This effect is the result of heat-stable secreted molecules with a molecular mass of less than 700 Da, which triggers a destabilization of the S. typhimurium membrane accompanied by a membrane depolarization affecting the functionality of the flagellar motor [Liévin-Le Moal et al. 2011]. Importantly, the supernatant of the rehydrated powder of the pharmaceutical capsule form exerted this blockade of S. typhimurium swimming motility [Liévin-Le Moal et al. 2011].
Salmonella attaches onto the brush border of host intestinal cells for cell entry and triggers a dramatic membrane remodelling [Fabrega and Vila, 2013]. This phenomenon follows the localized reorganization of the cell actin cytoskeleton that is promoted by the bacterial delivery onto the host cell via the type 3 secretion system (T3SS) dependent molecular syringe apparatus of a complex set of Salmonella pathogenicity island-1 (SPI-1) and island-2 effectors that hijack host cell signalling pathways. When S. typhimurium SL1344 is subjected to a sub-bactericidal concentration of secreted molecules of Lactobacillus LB prior to infection, there was an absence of F-actin dense region surrounding attached bacteria at the brush border of enterocyte-like Caco-2/TC7 cells [Coconnier et al. 2000; Liévin-Le Moal et al. 2011] (Table 1). This effect develops without affecting the presence of the T3SS needle, and modifies the expression levels of the invH gene coding for a component of the T3SS complex, and SPI-1 genes coding for SipA, SipB, SipD and SopD effectors [Liévin-Le Moal et al. 2011]. In consequence, it is tempting to hypothesize that the secreted molecules altered the functionality of the Salmonella T3SS syringe.
The secreted auto transporter toxin (Sat) of enterovirulent Afa/Dr DAEC promoted functional lesions at the brush border by increasing the transcellular passage of fluid across the intestinal barrier and inducing an accumulation of fluid within the intestinal lumen [Servin, 2014]. Both the untreated and heat-treated secreted molecule(s) of Lactobacillus LB at sub-bactericidal concentrations, and the supernatant of the rehydrated powder of the pharmaceutical capsule form concentration-dependent, antagonized Sat toxin activation of transcellular passage of fluid [Liévin-Le Moal et al. 2007] (Table 1).
Antagonist effects at mucosa
Secreted molecules of Lactobacillus LB exert a bactericidal activity against the diarrhoea-associated Afa/Dr DAEC C1845 bacteria attached at the brush border of enterocyte-like Caco-2/TC7 cells [Liévin-Le Moal et al. 2002]. As shown in Figure 1b, this bactericidal activity is also exerted by the secreted molecules of L. fermentum strain LB-f and the supernatant of the rehydrated powder of the pharmaceutical capsule form. Similarly, when the cultured human HT29-MTX cells secreting mucins of gastric immunoreactivity were infected with H. pylori, there was a dose-dependent decrease in the viability of the adhering pathogen after treatment with the secreted molecules of Lactobacillus LB [Coconnier et al. 1998] (Table 1). Moreover, the remaining adhering H. pylori showed a decreased urease activity and displayed an altered morphology.
Both live and heat-treated Lactobacillus LB cells displayed a high adhesiveness capacity to adhere onto enterocyte-like Caco-2 cells and mucus-secreting HT29-MTX cells [Chauviere et al. 1992b; Coconnier et al. 1993a]. As a result of this high capacity of adhesion, Lactobacillus LB cells and L. fermentum LB-f cells, and the cells present in the rehydrated powder of the pharmaceutical capsule form, exert a competitive inhibition activity to prevent the attachment at the brush border of different classes of enterovirulent E. coli and S. typhimurium (Table 1). Adhesion of E. coli strain B41 onto cultured epithelial cervix HeLa cells was inhibited competitively by heat-treated Lactobacillus LB cells and inhibitory activity was lost after lysis of the Lactobacillus cells, suggesting a steric hindrance of E coli adhesion sites at the epithelial cell membrane rather than competition for a common binding site [Fourniat et al. 1992]. Examined in competition-binding conditions in which bacterial pathogens and Lactobacillus cultures co-incubate with the cultured enterocyte-like Caco-2 cells, the attachment at the brush border of human ETEC H10407 and Pb176 strains expressing colonization factors CFA/I and CFA-II, respectively, was concentration-dependently inhibited by both live and heat-treated Lactobacillus LB cultures [Chauviere et al. 1992a] (Table 1).
As shown in Figure 2a, untreated and heat-treated Lactobacillus LB and L. fermentum LB-f cells, and cells isolated from the rehydrated powder of the pharmaceutical capsule form, exert a similar competitive inhibition activity against the attachment of ETEC H10407 at the brush border of enterocyte-like Caco-2/TC7 cells. Identically, when enterocyte-like Caco-2 cells were infected with enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) strain JPN15, L. monocytogenes strain EGD, Y. pseudotuberculosis [Coconnier et al. 1993a, 1993b] or a diarrhoea-associated Afa/Dr DAEC strain C1845 [Liévin-Le Moal et al. 2002], the attachment of pathogens at the brush border was concentration-dependently inhibited by untreated and heat-treated Lactobacillus LB cultures (Table 1). Similarly, live and heat-treated Lactobacillus LB cultures [Coconnier et al. 1993a, 1993b], and the rehydrated powder of the pharmaceutical capsule form [Liévin-Le Moal et al. 2011], promote the inhibition of cell association of S. typhimurium SL1344 in enterocyte-like Caco-2/TC7 cells (Table 1).
Figure 2.
Antagonistic effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus LB (L. fermentum LB-f + L. delbrueki LB-d) against adhesion and/or invasion of enterovirulent pathogens in cultured human enterocyte-like cells. (A) Concentration-dependent competitive inhibition of adhesion of diarrhoea-associated enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli strain H10407 expressing CFA-I adhesive fimbriae onto the brush border of Caco-2/TC7 cells. (B) Inhibition of the internalization of Salmonella typhimurium SL1344 into Caco-2/TC7 cells. (C) Time course of the bactericidal effect against S. typhimurium SL1344 residing in intracellular vacuoles after cell entry of the pathogen within Caco-2/TC7 cells.
The drawing on the left indicates the intestinal localization of the effects reported in (A) to (C).
CFCS, cell-free culture supernatant; CFU, culture-forming unit.
S. typhimurium after attachment onto the brush border of host enterocytes penetrates the cells [Fabrega and Vila, 2013]. Untreated and heat-treated Lactobacillus LB cultures, and untreated and heat-treated cell-free culture supernatants of Lactobacillus LB, inhibit the cell-entry of S. typhimurium in enterocyte-like Caco-2/TC7 cells [Coconnier et al. 1997, 2000; Coconnier-Polter et al. 2005; Liévin-Le Moal et al. 2011] (Table 1). As shown in Figure 2b, S. typhimurium SL1344 shows a similar decreased cell entry in Caco-2/TC7 cells when subjected to untreated and heat-treated secreted molecules of Lactobacillus LB or L. fermentum strain LB-f at subinhibitory bactericidal concentrations, or the supernatant of the rehydrated powder of the pharmaceutical capsule form during cell infection.
After cell entry S. typhimurium resides in the intracellular vacuoles of enterocytes and adapts to this situation by exploiting multiple endogenous host nutrients [Fabrega and Vila, 2013]. When S. typhimurium SL1344 resides intracellularly in vacuoles in pre-infected enterocyte-like Caco-2/TC7 cells, the secreted molecules of Lactobacillus LB exert a bactericidal activity against the intracellular bacteria [Coconnier et al. 2000] (Table 1). As shown in Figure 2c, untreated and heat-treated secreted molecules of Lactobacillus LB and L. fermentum strain LB-f, and the supernatant of the rehydrated powder of the pharmaceutical capsule form, exert an identical bactericidal activity against the intracellular S. typhimurium cells. In contrast, none of the antibiotics tested, including cephalothin, tetracycline, amoxicillin, clavulanic acid, gentamycin and pefloxacin, displayed any bactericidal activity against S. typhimurium located in the intracellular vacuoles [Coconnier et al. 2000]. Observation by transmission electron microscopy of the remaining present S. typhimurium cells located within the intracellular vacuoles shows that the cells displayed a death morphology [Coconnier et al. 2000] (Table 1). This effect at the intracellular level is of interest since it is well-established that several intracellular enterovirulent bacteria constitute a population of persistent and dormant pathogenic bacteria that play an important role in recurrent infections [Lewis, 2007].
The brush border of enterocytes is constituted by a regular array of microvilli, the membrane of which is endowed with a number of hydrolytic enzymes that are involved in the digestion of dietary carbohydrates and peptides, and transporters such as sucrase–isomaltase (SI), lactase, amino-peptidase N, dipeptidylpeptidase IV (DPP IV), alkaline phosphatase (APL) and hexose transporters (SGLT1, GLUT1, GLUT2, GLUT3 and GLUT5) [Turner, 2009]. Following diarrhoea-associated Afa/Dr DAEC cell infection, the disappearance of the brush border is accompanied by a dramatic loss of intestinal functions [Servin, 2014]. In Afa/Dr DAEC C1845-infected enterocyte-like Caco-2/TC7 cells, the treatment with secreted molecule(s) of Lactobacillus LB at sub-bactericidal concentrations results in the maintenance of a normal F-actin brush border cytoskeleton and by normal expression of microvillus-associated functional proteins SI, DPP IV, AP and GLUT5 [Liévin-Le Moal et al. 2002] (Table 1).
In enterocyte-like Caco-2/TC7 cells, untreated and heat-treated secreted molecules of Lactobacillus LB, and the supernatant of the rehydrated powder of the pharmaceutical capsule form, exerted an antagonistic activity against the Sat toxin-secretory activity since there was a concentration-dependent inhibition of the toxin-induced increase of fluid domes formed by an increased apical to basal transcellular passage of water [Liévin-Le Moal et al. 2007] (Table 1).
Closure of the intestinal barrier is maintained by intercellular junctional complexes composed of tight junctions (TJs), adherent junctions and desmosomes. In particular, the TJs are highly developed structures that function as a ‘gate’ between the mucosal and serous environments controlling the paracellular vectorial transports occurring across the intestinal barrier [Turner, 2009]. The rehydrated powder of the pharmaceutical capsule form protects the TJs of cultured human intestinal HT-29 cells by counteracting the aspirin-induced delocalization and loss of expression of structural TJs-associated structural ZO-1 protein [Montalto et al. 2004].
Anti-infectious effects in infected animal models
Antibacterial activity of L. acidophilus LB against diarrhoea-associated bacterial pathogens has also been investigated in different infectious mice models (Table 1). In newborn mice infected with the bovine enterotoxigenic ETEC strain B41, all the infected mice were dead 72 hours after infection; however, there was a high significant increase of the survival rate when the infected animals received the rehydrated powder of the pharmaceutical form orally every day [Fourniat et al. 1986]. In comparison with erythromycin treatment, oral administration of the rehydrated powder of the pharmaceutical capsule form in germ-free mice infected with the invasive Campylobacter jejuni strain 79K results in an accelerated decrease of pathogen colonization of ileum and colon mucosa without modifying the level of the pathogen within the intestinal content and a high significant decrease of translocation of the pathogen into mesenteric lymph nodes [Moyen et al. 1986]. Oral administration of secreted molecules of Lactobacillus LB in S. typhimurium strain C5 infected conventional C3H/He/oujco mice promotes a high significant decrease of the level of live pathogen in the faeces compared with untreated mice [Coconnier et al. 1997]. Oral treatment of H. felis infected conventional BALB/c mice with secreted molecules of Lactobacillus LB decreases the level of gastric mucosa-associated H. felis, reduces the urease activity of the remaining mucosa-attached H. felis, and lowers the level of H. felis induced gastric inflammation characterized by a diminished number of infiltrated inflammatory lymphocytes, plasma cells, and polymorphonuclear cells in the antrum and corpus mucosa [Coconnier et al. 1998] (Table 1).
As analysed above, the untreated or heat-treated Lactobacillus LB (L. fermentum LB-f and L. delbrueckii LB-d) and L. fermentum strain LB-f cells, and their heat-stable secreted molecules are experimentally active in vitro and in vivo against a large set of gastroenterovirulent bacteria triggering deleterious structural and functional lesions in the stomach or intestinal barrier leading to acute watery diarrhoea or gastritis. The identified mechanisms underlying the anti-infectious effects of heat-treated, lyophilized Lactobacillus LB cells and concentrated, neutralized spent culture medium composing the pharmaceutical forms appear to be multifaceted (summarized in Figure 3). The heat-treated whole cells inhibited the cell attachment and internalization of gastrointestinal bacterial pathogens with cultured human intestinal epithelial cells. Heat-stable secreted molecules have a direct bactericidal effect after direct contact with gastrointestinal bacterial pathogens at the luminal level and against the brush border associated or internalized gastrointestinal bacterial pathogens. In addition, heat-stable secreted molecules inhibited the functionality of bacterial virulence factors.
Figure 3.
Summary of mechanisms of action of Lactobacillus acidophilus LB (L. fermentum LB-f + L. delbrueki LB-d) against human diarrhoea-associated bacterial pathogens.
The drawing on the left summarizes the activities of Lactobacillus LB cells and secreted molecules against luminally localized bacterial pathogens (A) and bacterial pathogens attached at the brush border or internalized in polarized intestinal epithelial cells (B). The drawing on the right summarizes the antagonistic activities of L. acidophilus LB secreted molecules against the pathogen-induced, signalling-dependent structural and functional lesions in the intestinal epithelial cells. In homeostasis situations, the intestinal epithelium is constituted of a single layer of specialized, highly-polarized epithelial cells expressing membrane-bound proteins and transporters with specific intestinal functions at the brush border. At the lateral cell-to-cell junctional domain, structural and functional proteins sealed the intestinal barrier. In infectious situations, diarrhoea-associated bacterial pathogens promoted host cell structural and functional disorders by the way of their bacterial virulence factors including bacterial effectors molecules and cytotonic or cytotoxic bacterial toxins, all able to hijack host cell signalling-dependent pathways. Treatments with untreated or heat-treated L. acidophilus LB secreted molecules or cell-free culture supernatant of rehydrated powder of the pharmaceutical form counteract the pathogen-induced deleterious effects at the brush border and at the cell-to-cell junctional domain.
These anti-bacterial effects indicate that, in the infectious situation, there is an absence of bacterial pathogens-induced, signalling-dependent structural and functional lesions at the intestinal mucosa and junctional levels, and gastritis-associated inflammatory lesions at the gastric mucosa. Moreover, the observation that heat-stable secreted molecules are active at a sub-bactericidal concentration suggests the presence of molecules exerting antagonistic or regulatory activities against the pathogen-activated cell signalling pathways at the intestinal epithelial barrier. In addition, effects observed in non-infectious situations, i.e. in the presence of aspirin-induced TJs lesions [Montalto et al. 2004] and Sat toxin-induced activation of transcellular passage of fluids [Liévin-Le Moal et al. 2007], and in patients with diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome [Halpern et al. 1996; Tarrerias et al. 2011; Andresen et al. 2012] suggest the production by L. acidophilus LB of compounds having regulatory activities onto intestinal cellular functions.
Safety
In a recent analysis conducted to analyse the safety of organisms from six different genera used as probiotic agents including Lactobacillus alone or in combination, and including clinical trials conducted with the heat-treated and lyophilized L. acidophilus LB cells and concentrated, neutralized spent culture medium, Hempel and colleagues concluded that there was an absence of reported adverse events in intervention studies conducted to reduce the risk, prevent or treat gastrointestinal infectious diseases [Hempel et al. 2011]. The safety of heat-treated and lyophilized L. acidophilus LB cells and culture medium has been indicated in two RCTs [Liévin-Le Moal et al. 2007; Salazar-Lindo et al. 2007] and there was an absence of reported adverse effects in others RCTs [Boulloche et al. 1994; Simakachorn et al. 2000].
Clinical efficacy against enterovirulent bacteria and rotavirus induced acute watery diarrhoea
The World Health Organization (WHO) has defined diarrhoea as the passage of 3 or more loose or watery stools within a 24-hour period. Diarrhoea is described as being acute if the illness started less than 14 days previously, and persistent if the episode lasts 14 days or more. Worldwide, rotavirus is a major common cause of severe diarrhoea and diarrhoea-related mortality in children [Hagbom et al. 2012]. The major bacterial pathogens involved in diarrhoea are ETEC, Salmonella, Shigella, Yersinia, Campylobacter and Vibrio cholera [Croxen et al. 2013]. Moreover, ETEC-induced acute diarrhoea is common among travellers and tourists. To prevent dehydration and nutritional damage in children and infants with infectious acute watery diarrhoea, the therapeutic regimen recommended by the WHO, the European Society for Paediatric Infectious Diseases, and ESPGHAN is to provide an ORS and to continue feeding [Guarino et al. 2008; Piescik-Lech et al. 2013]. Although oral rehydration effectively mitigates dehydration, it has no effect on the infection causes and the duration, severity or frequency of diarrhoeal episodes. A variety of luminally acting agents are used to treat diarrhoea by altering intestinal and/or colonic motility, or fluid secretion, but some of which have adverse effects [Menees et al. 2012]. Innovative therapeutics in the pipeline target intestinal ion channels and transporters, cell surface receptors, and cell signaling regulatory proteins [Thiagarajah et al. 2015]. Recommendations have been given for the use of a limited number of probiotic strains as an adjunct to rehydration therapy for the treatment of acute gastroenteritis in previously healthy infants and children [Szajewska et al. 2014a].
Non-RCTs and RCTs have shown the therapeutic efficacy of heat-treated and lyophilized L. acidophilus LB cells and culture medium (Drug) in conjunction with ORS for the treatment of rotavirus-induced, well-established acute watery diarrhoea in children (Table 2). In infants and young children with well-established acute watery diarrhoea of undetermined infectious origin, Boulloche and colleagues [Boulloche et al. 1994] reported that treatment with the heat-treated and lyophilized L. acidophilus LB cells and culture medium had resulted in a shortening of the duration of diarrhoea and an acceleration of the reappearance of the first normal consistent stool from 64.7 hours in placebo + ORS group versus 49.7 hours in Drug + ORS group [mean difference (MD) −15.0 hours, 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) −28.99 to −1.01]. Simakachorn and colleagues [Simakachorn et al. 2000] have shown in children aged 3–24 months with rotavirus-induced, well-established acute watery diarrhoea that Drug + ORS treatment reduced the duration of diarrhoea from 57.0 hours to 43.4 hours (MD −13.6 hours, 95% CI −28.10 to 0.90), accompanied by an accelerated reappearance of formed stools compared with placebo + ORS treatment. Interestingly, in children with identified rotavirus-associated watery diarrhoea, only 16% of the children had watery stools after the first day of Drug + ORS treatment whereas 56% had watery stools in the group treated with placebo + ORS. Additionally, a non-RCT conducted in infants and young children mainly with rotavirus-associated diarrhoea has shown that the treatment with heat-treated and lyophilized L. acidophilus LB cells and culture medium leads to a high significant reduction of the number of stools per day [Li Xie, 1995].
Table 2.
Overviews of clinical therapeutic anti-infectious effects of lyophilized, heat-treated Lactobacillus LB cells and concentrated, neutralized spent culture medium.
| Disease | Patients (treated/control) | Treatments1 | Clinical effects (control/treated)1 | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteria- and rotavirus-induced acute diarrhoea | 71 (children) (38/33) | 3 sachets during the first 24 hours followed by 2 sachets daily with ORS | Shortening of the duration of diarrhoea (67.8 hours in placebo group versus 41.1 hours in Drug* + ORS group) and acceleration of the reappearance of the first stool with normal consistency | Boulloche et al. [1994] |
| Rotavirus-induced acute diarrhoea | 50 (children) | 3 sachets daily | Reduction of the number of stools per day in Drug group versus placebo group | Li Xie [1995] |
| Rotavirus-induced acute diarrhoea | 73 (children) 37/36) | 6 sachets with ORS | Shortening of the duration of diarrhoea (74.0 hours in placebo group versus 42.9 hours in Drug + ORS group) | Simakachorn et al. [2000] |
| Bacteria-induced acute diarrhoea | 80 (children) 40/40) | 6 sachets during 35 hours with ORS | Shortening of the duration of diarrhoea (all patients: 16.6 hours in placebo group versus 10.0 hours in Drug + ORS group); patients with established diarrhoea up to 24 hours: 30.4 hours in placebo group versus 8.2 hours in Drug + ORS group) | Salazar-Lindo et al. [2007] |
| Bacteria-induced acute diarrhoea | 80 (children) 42/38) | 8 sachets during 96 hours with ORS | Shortening of the duration of diarrhoea (63.4 hours in placebo group versus 39.5 hours in Drug + ORS group) | Liévin-Le Moal et al. [2011] |
| Bacteria- and parasitic-induced chronic diarrhoea | 69 (adult) | 2 capsules twice a day for 4 weeks | Improvement of stool consistency in 81% of Drug-treated patients | Xiao et al. [2003] |
| Antibiotic-associated diarrhoea | 184 (adult) | 2 capsules daily during one week of antibiotic treatment (penicillins or macrolides) | Shortening of the duration of diarrhoea (2.39 days in placebo group versus 1.53 day in Drug group) | Yap Soo Kor et al. [2010] |
Drug: sachet or capsule pharmaceutical forms (Lactéol®) containing lyophilized and heat-treated combination of 10 billion L. acidophilus LB cells (L. fermentum LB-f + L. delbrueki LB-d; Ratio 95/5) and 160 mg of concentrated neutralized spent culture medium.
ORS, oral rehydration solution.
The therapeutic efficacy of probiotic Lactobacillus strains against established enterovirulent bacteria-induced acute watery diarrhoea in children has rarely evidenced in RCTs [Liévin-Le Moal and Servin, 2014]. Consistent with the in vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of L. acidophilus LB against the major diarrhoea-associated bacterial pathogens described above, two RCTs have shown that heat-treated and lyophilized L. acidophilus LB cells and culture medium treatment was therapeutically effective in children with established enterovirulent bacteria-induced diarrhoea. Salazar-Lindo and colleagues [Salazar-Lindo et al. 2007] have shown in an RCT an age-dependent shortening of the duration of diarrhoea in children aged 2–4 after treatment with the heat-treated and lyophilized L. acidophilus LB cells and culture medium. While there is an absence of therapeutic effect with Drug + ORS versus placebo + ORS in overall enrolled children, a subclassification of children in two groups as a function of the duration of diarrhoea at the inclusion showed that Drug + ORS versus placebo + ORS is ineffective in the reduction of the duration of diarrhoea in children with mild acute watery diarrhoea (<24 hours) and is well effective in children with well-established acute watery diarrhoea (>24 hours), with a highly significant decrease in the duration of diarrhoea (8.2 hours versus 30.4 hours) (Table 2). Moreover, a comparison of children by age showed a better reduction of the duration of diarrhoea in children between the ages of 2 and 4 years (29.0 hours in placebo + ORS group versus 8.55 hours in Drug + ORS group) versus children aged 1 month to 2 years (12.3 hours in placebo + ORS group versus 10.3 hours in Drug + ORS group). Liévin-Le Moal and colleagues [Liévin-Le Moal et al. 2011] reported that in children between the ages of 1 and 34 months with infectious well-established acute watery diarrhoea of non-rotavirus origin, treatment with heat-treated and lyophilized L. acidophilus LB cells and culture medium in association with ORS reduced the duration of diarrhoea (63.4 hours in placebo + ORS group versus 39.5 hours in Drug + ORS group (MD −23.9 hours, 95% CI −29.6 to −18.2). Moreover, the diarrhoea was resolved in a significantly higher proportion of children in the Drug + ORS group (90%: 36 of 42 children) than in the placebo + ORS group (53%: 20 of 38 children), and solid stools were formed in children of the Drug + ORS group, whereas those of the children of the placebo + ORS group tended to remain fluid or semi-fluid. Xiao and colleagues [Xiao et al. 2003] showed in a multicentre RCT conducted in adults of ages 16 years and over with bacteria- and parasitic-associated chronic diarrhoea that heat-treated and lyophilized L. acidophilus LB cells and culture medium promotes a rapid recovery of consistent stools in 81% of treated patients.
Szajewska and colleagues [Szajewska et al. 2014a, 2014b] conducted a meta-analysis pooling the results of the 224 children in three RCTs conducted with heat-treated and lyophilized L. acidophilus LB cells and culture medium + ORS in comparison with placebo + ORS [Boulloche et al. 1994; Simakachorn et al. 2000; Liévin-Le Moal et al. 2007]. Results showed a significant reduction in the duration of diarrhoea for Drug + ORS compared with placebo + ORS (MD −21.6 hours, 95% CI −26.5 to −16.6). Moreover, the pooled results of 2 RCTs [Simakachorn et al. 2000; Liévin-Le Moal et al. 2007] involving 153 children showed that the Drug + ORS treatment increased the chance of cure to cure on day 4 compared with placebo + ORS [risk ratio (RR) 95% CI: 1.44].
The therapeutic efficacy of probiotic Lactobacillus strains in the treatment of the antibiotic-associated diarrhoea has been clinically proven [Hickson, 2011; Johnston et al. 2011, 2012; Hempel et al. 2012]. In a RCT conducted in 200 adult patients who received an antibiotic treatment, the heat-treated and lyophilized L. acidophilus LB cells and culture medium lead to a reduction of the duration of diarrhoea compared with patients who were receiving the antibiotics treatment alone, but did not reduce the risk of developing bloating, flatus and abdominal pain [Yap Soo Kor et al. 2010] (Table 2).
Enterovirulent bacteria-induced acute diarrhoea is common amongst travellers and tourists. Briand and colleagues [Briand et al. 2006] evaluated the efficacy of heat-treated and lyophilized L. acidophilus LB cells and culture medium in the prevention of travellers’ diarrhoea in a RCT conducted in adults travellers visiting West, East, Central and North Africa, Oceania, South America, Asia, Central America/the Caribbean and Middle East between 2001 and 2004. They reported that treatment before departure twice daily with heat-treated and lyophilized L. acidophilus LB cells and culture medium had no effect on the incidence of diarrhoea in the treated group compared with the placebo group during the interval of 27 days of travel (Table 2). This observation is consistent with previous RCTs showing the lack of therapeutic efficacy for the prevention of intestinal infectious episodes in travellers by the administration of probiotic Lactobacillus strains (Ritchie and Romanuk, 2012; Liévin-Le Moal and Servin, 2014].
Comparison with different marketed probiotic Lactobacillus strains
The level of therapeutic efficacy of heat-treated and lyophilized L. acidophilus LB cells and culture medium against established infectious acute watery diarrhoea (MD −21.6 hours, 95% CI −26.5 to −16.6) [Szajewska et al. 2014a] is close to the level found by Allen and colleagues [Allen et al. 2010] in their Cochrane analysis of 63 RCTs and quasi-randomized controlled trials monitored with different Lactobacillus probiotic strains for the treatment of infectious acute watery diarrhoea (various aetiology origins; MD −24.76 hours, 95% CI −15.9 to −33.6).
L. rhamnosus GG, L. casei Shirota YIT9029, L. johnsonii NCC 533, L. casei DN-114 001 and L. reuteri DSM 17938 are the main experimentally and clinically well-described Lactobacillus strains of human intestinal microbiota origin [Liévin-Le Moal and Servin, 2014].
L. rhamnosus GG displays a similar therapeutic efficacy against infectious acute watery diarrhoea (11 RCTs; aetiology: mainly rotavirus-induced and unknown causes; MD −25.2 hours, 95% CI −40.8 to −9.6) [Szajewska et al. 2007b, 2013b, 2014a; Guarino et al. 2008; Liévin-Le Moal and Servin, 2014] compared with heat-treated and lyophilized L. acidophilus LB cells and culture medium (3 RCTs; aetiology: 80–100% rotavirus- and enterovirulent bacteria-induced diarrhoea; MD −21.6 hours, 95% CI −26.5 to −16.6). In contrast to heat-treated and lyophilized L. acidophilus LB cells and culture medium, L. rhamnosus GG displays no therapeutic efficacy against enterovirulent bacteria-induced acute watery diarrhoea [Liévin-Le Moal and Servin, 2014]. The probiotic L. reuteri strain 17938 shows a similar therapeutic efficacy against infectious acute watery diarrhoea (5 RCTs; aetiology: 60% rotavirus-induced diarrhoea and unknown causes; MD −32 hours, 95% CI −41.0 to −24.0) [Guarino et al. 2008; Szajewska et al. 2013a, 2014a; Liévin-Le Moal and Servin, 2014] compared with heat-treated and lyophilized L. acidophilus LB cells and culture medium (MD −21.6 hours, 95% CI −26.5 to −16.6).
There is an absence of RCTs conducted with probiotic L. casei Shirota YIT9029 and L. johnsonii NCC 533 strains against infectious acute watery diarrhoea [Liévin-Le Moal and Servin, 2014]. Other probiotic Lactobacillus strains isolated from the human intestinal microbiota are present in products [WGO, 2012] such as L. acidophilus strain NCFM (also designated RL8K/NCK45/NCK56/N2) (ATCC 700396) [Sanders and Klaenhammer, 2001], L. plantarum 299v (DSM 6595) and L. fermentum ME-3 (DSM 14241) [Mikelsaar and Zilmer, 2009]. These probiotic strains have been tested in vitro against gastrointestinal bacterial pathogens or in animal infection models, but there was an absence of RCTs conducted in human infection gastrointestinal situations. For the L. rhamnosus R0011 (CNCM I-1720) and L. helveticus R0052 (CNCM I-1722) strains isolated from dairy [Foster et al. 2011], there was only one RCT (unknown aetiology; MD −23.8 hours, 95% CI −60.0 to −9.6) [Szajewska et al. 2014a].
It is noteworthy that the probiotic, non-lactic acid producing yeast strain Saccharomyces boulardii displays a therapeutic efficacy against acute watery diarrhoea of diverse infectious origins (11 RCTs; MD −23.8 hours, 95% CI −33.6 to −14.4) [Szajewska and Skorka, 2009; Szajewska et al. 2014a]. Moreover, S. boulardii exerts a strong therapeutic efficacy against antibiotic or Clostidium difficile associated diarrhoea [Szajewska et al. 2007a; Guarino et al. 2008; McFarland, 2010; Johnston et al. 2011, 2012].
While stating that the heat-treated and lyophilized L. acidophilus LB cells and culture medium cannot be considered as a probiotic, the ESPGHAN Working Group for Probiotics and Prebiotics included the results of RCTs conducted with heat-treated and lyophilized L. acidophilus LB cells and culture medium in a recent comparison of RCTs conducted with probiotic products for the treatment of acute gastroenteritis [Szajewska et al. 2014a]. Two groups of products have been proposed, the first containing products with a positive recommendation and the second including products with insufficient evidence to make a recommendation. The heat-treated and lyophilized L. acidophilus LB cells and culture medium has been classified in the first group together with the L. rhamnosus GG and L. reuteri DSM 17938 strains, and the yeast strain S. boulardii. However, an additional mention indicates limited or weak evidences for L. reuteri DSM 17938 and heat-treated and lyophilized L. acidophilus LB cells and culture medium on the basis that the quality of the clinical efficacy was downgraded by the methodological limitations of the trials and by the low number of published RCTs.
The most common forms containing probiotics Lactobacillus strains are dairy products, although tablets, capsules and sachets containing freeze-dried probiotic bacteria are also available [WGO, 2012]. Stability dependence on various factors is critical to guarantee the efficacy of the pharmacological effects ascribed to a probiotic strain present in the final product formulation [Sanders et al. 2014]. As decay of the viable cells count is a phenomenon typical of every formulation containing viable probiotic bacteria [Del Piano et al. 2006], the strict observance of the storage conditions is needed to guarantee that the product remains stable and pharmacologically effective over the indicated conservation time. For lyophilized probiotic bacteria, the conduct of the recommended resuscitation process is necessary considering that this step is critical for to obtain viable, active probiotic bacteria [Muller et al. 2010]. The pharmaceutical forms containing heat-treated and lyophilized L. acidophilus LB cells and concentrated, neutralized spent culture medium have the advantage of providing a controlled and stable quantity of heat-treated whole-cells and secreted, heat-stable anti-bacterial molecules displaying the experimentally observed pharmacological antibacterial activities exerted by the live L. acidophilus LB.
Conclusion
Experimental studies and non-RCTs and RCTs demonstrated the role of L. acidophilus LB cells and concentrated, neutralized spent culture medium as a good biotherapeutic agent to treat several gastrointestinal infectious diseases. These pharmacological anti-infectious properties fit well with the term ‘pharmabiotics’ proposed by Shanahan and colleagues [Shanahan et al. 2009]. However, some of the RCTs performed several years ago not meet the new criteria/requirements for the demonstration of the therapeutic efficacy of drugs in clinical infectious conditions. Considering the above mentioned opinion by the ESPGHAN Working Group for Probiotics and Prebiotics [Szajewska et al. 2014a] underlining the necessity to improve the evidence of the therapeutic efficacy of heat-treated L. acidophilus LB cells and concentrated, neutralized spent culture medium to treat gastrointestinal infectious disorders, additional RCTs are needed particularly in outpatients and inpatients for the treatment of established acute watery diarrhoea.
Acknowledgments
I wish to acknowledge all researchers who have helped to unravel aspects of antimicrobial Lactobacillus LB effects. I am grateful to M.H. Coconnier-Polter for our fruitful collaboration in identifying the mechanisms of the antimicrobial properties of Lactobacillus LB. I would like to express my earnest appreciation to A.L. Servin who has outstandingly headed the research on the antimicrobial properties of lactic acid producing probiotic strains at the Inserm and University Paris-Sud Research Units at the Faculty of Pharmacy Châtenay-Malabry. Finally I would like to thank R. Boisseau for his constant support for academic and therapeutic research.
Footnotes
Funding: This academic review received no specific grant from any research agency, commercial, or non-profit associations.
Conflict of interest statement: The author holds US and European patents for Lactobacillus LB and LB-f strains without holding shares or equity. The author declares no conflicts of interest in preparing this article.
References
- Allen S., Martinez E., Gregorio G., Dans L. (2010) Probiotics for treating acute infectious diarrhoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD003048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Andresen V., Layer P., Menge D., Keller J. (2012) Efficacy of freeze-dried Lactobacilli in functional diarrhoea: a pilot study. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 137: 1792–1796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boulloche J., Mouterde O., Mallet E. (1994) Management of acute diarrhoea in infants and young children: controlled study of the anti-diarrhoeal efficacy of killed L. acidophilus (LB Strain) versus a placebo and a reference drug (loperamide). Ann Pediatr 41: 457–463. [Google Scholar]
- Briand V., Buffet P., Genty S., Lacombe K., Godineau N., Salomon J., et al. (2006) Absence of efficacy of nonviable Lactobacillus acidophilus for the prevention of traveler’s diarrhea: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Clin Infect Dis 43: 1170–1175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chauviere G., Coconnier M., Kerneis S., Darfeuille-Michaud A., Joly B., Servin A. (1992a) Competitive exclusion of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) from human enterocyte-like Caco-2 cells by heat-killed Lactobacillus. FEMS Microbiol Lett 70: 213–217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chauviere G., Coconnier M., Kerneis S., Fourniat J., Servin A. (1992b) Adhesion of human Lactobacillus acidophilus strain LB to human enterocyte-like Caco-2 cells. J Gen Microbiol 138: 1689–1696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chauviere G., Gastebois B., Liévin-Le Moal V., Polter M., Servin A. (2005) Lactobacillus fermentum strain and uses thereof. European Patent EP 1608737 A1. [Google Scholar]
- Coconnier M., Bernet M., Chauviere G., Servin A. (1993a) Adhering heat-killed human Lactobacillus acidophilus, strain LB, inhibits the process of pathogenicity of diarrhoeagenic bacteria in cultured human intestinal cells. J Diarrhoeal Dis Res 11: 235–242. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coconnier M., Bernet M., Kerneis S., Chauviere G., Fourniat J., Servin A. (1993b) Inhibition of adhesion of enteroinvasive pathogens to human intestinal Caco-2 cells by Lactobacillus acidophilus strain LB decreases bacterial invasion. FEMS Microbiol Lett 110: 299–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coconnier M., Liévin V., Bernet-Camard M., Hudault S., Servin A. (1997) Antibacterial effect of the adhering human Lactobacillus acidophilus strain LB. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 41: 1046–1052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coconnier M., Liévin V., Hemery E., Servin A. (1998) Antagonistic activity against Helicobacter infection in vitro and in vivo by the human Lactobacillus acidophilus strain LB. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 4573–4580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coconnier M., Liévin V., Lorrot M., Servin A. (2000) Antagonistic activity of Lactobacillus acidophilus LB against intracellular Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium infecting human enterocyte-like Caco-2/TC-7 cells. Appl Environ Microbiol 66: 1152–1157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coconnier-Polter M., Liévin-Le Moal V., Servin A. (2005) A Lactobacillus acidophilus strain of human gastrointestinal microbiota origin elicits killing of enterovirulent Salmonella enterica Serovar typhimurium by triggering lethal bacterial membrane damage. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 6115–6120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cover T., Blaser M. (2009) Helicobacter pylori in health and disease. Gastroenterology 136: 1863–1873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Croxen M., Law R., Scholz R., Keeney K., Wlodarska M., Finlay B. (2013) Recent advances in understanding enteric pathogenic Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Rev 26: 822–880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Del Piano M., Morelli L., Strozzi G., Allesina S., Barba M., Deidda F., et al. (2006) Probiotics: from research to consumer. Dig Liver Dis 38: S248–S255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fabrega A., Vila J. (2013) Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium skills to succeed in the host: virulence and regulation. Clin Microbiol Rev 26: 308–341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FAO/WHO (2001) Report of a joint FAO/WHO expert consultation on evaluation of health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria. Cordoba, Argentina, 1–4 October 2001. Rome: World Health Organization and Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. [Google Scholar]
- FAO/WHO (2002) Report of a joint FAO/WHO working group on drafting guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food. Rome: World Health Organization and Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. [Google Scholar]
- Floch M., Madsen K., Jenkins D., Guandalini S., Katz J., Onderdonk A., et al. (2006) Recommendations for probiotic use. J Clin Gastroenterol 40: 275–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Foster L., Tompkins T., Dahl W. (2011) A comprehensive post-market review of studies on a probiotic product containing Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus R0011. Benef Microbes 2: 319–334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fourniat J., Colomban C., Linxe C., Karam D. (1992) Heat-killed Lactobacillus acidophilus inhibits adhesion of Escherichia coli B41 to HeLa cells. Ann Rech Vet 23: 361–370. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fourniat J., Djaballi Z., Maccario J., Bourlioux P., German A. (1986) Effect of the administration of killed Lactobacillus acidophilus on the survival of suckling mice infected with a strain of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Ann Rech Vet 17: 401–407. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gareau M., Sherman P., Walker W. (2010) Probiotics and the gut microbiota in intestinal health and disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 7: 503–514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guarino A., Albano F., Ashkenazi S., Gendrel D., Hoekstra J., Shamir R., et al. (2008) European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition/European Society for Paediatric Infectious Diseases evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute gastroenteritis in children in Europe. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 46(Suppl. 2): S81–S122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Halpern G., Prindiville T., Blankenburg M., Hsia T., Gershwin M. (1996) Treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with Lactéol Fort: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial. Am J Gastroenterol 91: 1579–1585. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hagbom M., Sharma S., Lundgren O., Svensson L. (2012) Towards a human rotavirus disease model. Curr Opin Virol 2: 408–418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hempel S., Newberry S., Maher A., Wang Z., Miles J., Shanman R., et al. (2012) Probiotics for the prevention and treatment of antibiotic-associated diarrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 307: 1959–1969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hempel S., Newberry S., Ruelaz A., Wang Z., Miles J., Suttorp M., et al. (2011) Safety of probiotics used to reduce risk and prevent or treat disease. Report/Technology Assessment No. 200. AHRQ Publication No. 11-E007. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hickson M. (2011) Probiotics in the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea and Clostridium difficile infection. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 4: 185–197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hill C., Guarner F., Reid G., Gibson G., Merenstein D., Pot B., et al. (2014) Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 11: 506–514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoffman F. (2008) Development of probiotics as biologic drugs. Clin Infect Dis 46(Suppl. 2): S125–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Isidean S., Riddle M., Savarino S., Porter C. (2011) A systematic review of ETEC epidemiology focusing on colonization factor and toxin expression. Vaccine 29: 6167–6178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnston B., Goldenberg J., Vandvik P., Sun X., Guyatt G. (2011) Probiotics for the prevention of pediatric antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD004827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnston B., Ma S., Goldenberg J., Thorlund K., Vandvik P., Loeb M., Guyatt G. (2012) Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 157: 878–888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kleerebezem M., Hols P., Bernard E., Rolain T., Zhou M., Siezen R., Bron P. (2010) The extracellular biology of the lactobacilli. FEMS Microbiol Rev 34: 199–230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lebeer S., Vanderleyden J., De Keersmaecker S. (2008) Genes and molecules of lactobacilli supporting probiotic action. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 72: 728–764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lebeer S., Vanderleyden J., De Keersmaecker S. (2010) Host interactions of probiotic bacterial surface molecules: comparison with commensals and pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol 8: 171–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lewis K. (2007) Persister cells, dormancy and infectious disease. Nat Rev Microbiol 5: 48–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li Xie B. (1995) Controlled clinical trial in infants and children comparing Lactéol Fort sachets with two antidiarrhoeal reference drugs Ann Pediatr 42: 396–401. [Google Scholar]
- Liévin-Le Moal V., Amsellem R., Servin A. (2011) Impairment of swimming motility by antidiarrheic Lactobacillus acidophilus strain LB retards internalization of Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium within human enterocyte-like cells. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55: 4810–4820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liévin-Le Moal V., Amsellem R., Servin A., Coconnier M. (2002) Lactobacillus acidophilus (strain LB) from the resident adult human gastrointestinal microflora exerts activity against brush border damage promoted by a diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli in human enterocyte-like cells. Gut 50: 803–811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liévin-Le Moal V., Sarrazin-Davila L., Servin A. (2007) An experimental study and a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the antisecretory activity of Lactobacillus acidophilus strain LB against nonrotavirus diarrhea. Pediatrics 120: e795–e803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liévin-Le Moal V., Servin A. (2014) Anti-infective activities of Lactobacillus strains in the human intestinal microbiota: from probiotics to gastrointestinal anti-infectious biotherapeutic agents. Clin Microbiol Rev 27: 167–199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McFarland L. (2010) Systematic review and meta-analysis of Saccharomyces boulardii in adult patients. World J Gastroenterol 16: 2202–2222 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Menees S., Saad R., Chey W. (2012) Agents that act luminally to treat diarrhoea and constipation. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 9: 661–674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Metchnikoff E. (1907) Lactic acid as inhibiting intestinal putrefaction. In: The Prolongation of Life: Optimistic Studies. London: Heinemann, pp. 161–183. [Google Scholar]
- Mikelsaar M., Zilmer M. (2009) Lactobacillus fermentum ME-3 – an antimicrobial and antioxidative probiotic. Microb Ecol Health Dis 21: 1–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Montalto M., Maggiano N., Ricci R., Curigliano V., Santoro L., Di Nicuolo F., et al. (2004) Lactobacillus acidophilus protects tight junctions from aspirin damage in HT-29 cells. Digestion 69: 225–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moyen E., Bonneville F., Fauchere J. (1986) Modification of intestinal colonization and translocation of Campylobacter jejuni by erythromycin and an extract of Lactobacillus acidophilus in axenic mice. Ann Inst Pasteur Microbiol 137A: 199–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muller J., Stanton C., Sybesma W., Fitzgerald G., Ross R. (2010) Reconstitution conditions for dried probiotic powders represent a critical step in determining cell viability. J Appl Microbiol 108: 1369–1379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Piescik-Lech M., Shamir R., Guarino A., Szajewska H. (2013) Review article: the management of acute gastroenteritis in children. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 37: 289–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ritchie M., Romanuk T. (2012) A meta-analysis of probiotic efficacy for gastrointestinal diseases. PLoS One 7: e34938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salazar-Lindo E., Figueroa-Quintanilla D., Caciano M., Reto-Valiente V., Chauviere G., Colin P. (2007) Effectiveness and safety of Lactobacillus LB in the treatment of mild acute diarrhea in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 44: 571–576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sanders M., Hamilton J., Reid G., Gibson G. (2007) A nonviable preparation of Lactobacillus acidophilus is not a probiotic. Clin Infect Dis 44: 886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sanders M., Klaenhammer T. (2001) Invited review: the scientific basis of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM functionality as a probiotic. J Dairy Sci 84: 319–331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sanders M., Klaenhammer T., Ouwehand A., Pot B., Johansen E., Heimbach J., et al. (2014) Effects of genetic, processing, or product formulation changes on efficacy and safety of probiotics. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1309: 1–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Segers M., Lebeer S. (2014) Towards a better understanding of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG - host interactions. Microb. Cell Factories 13: 1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Servin A. (2014) Pathogenesis of human diffusely adhering Escherichia coli expressing Afa/Dr adhesins (Afa/Dr DAEC): current insights and future challenges. Clin Microbiol Rev 27: 823–869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Servin A., Coconnier M.H., Liévin V., Boisseau R., Houlier P., Chauvière G. (1999) Composition anti-bactérienne. European Patent EP 1000625 A1. [Google Scholar]
- Servin A, Chauviere G., Polter M., Liévin-Le Moal V., Gastebois B. (2006) Lactobacillus fermentum strain and uses thereof. US Patent 0,134,220. [Google Scholar]
- Shanahan F., Stanton C., Ross R., Hill C. (2009) Pharmabiotics: bioactives from mining host-microbe-dietary interactions. Functionnal Food Rev. 1: 20–25. [Google Scholar]
- Simakachorn N., Pichaipat V., Rithipornpaisarn P., Kongkaew C., Tongpradit P., Varavithya W. (2000) Clinical evaluation of the addition of lyophilized, heat-killed Lactobacillus acidophilus LB to oral rehydration therapy in the treatment of acute diarrhea in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 30: 68–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sutton A. (2008) Product development of probiotics as biological drugs. Clin Infect Dis 46(Suppl. 2): S128–S132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Szajewska H., Guarino A., Hojsak I., Indrio F., Kolacek S., Shamir R., et al. (2014a) Use of probiotics for management of acute gastroenteritis: a position paper by the ESPGHAN Working Group for Probiotics and Prebiotics. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 58: 531–539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Szajewska H., Gyrczuk E., Horvath A. (2013a) Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 for the management of infantile colic in breastfed infants: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Pediatr 162: 257–262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Szajewska H., Ruszczynski M., Kolacek S. (2014b) Meta-analysis shows limited evidence for using Lactobacillus acidophilus LB to treat acute gastroenteritis in children. Acta Paediatr 103: 249–255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Szajewska H., Skorka A. (2009) Saccharomyces boulardii for treating acute gastroenteritis in children: updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 30: 960–961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Szajewska H., Skorka A., Dylag M. (2007a) Meta-analysis: Saccharomyces boulardii for treating acute diarrhoea in children. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 25: 257–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Szajewska H., Skorka A., Ruszczynski M., Gieruszczak-Bialek D. (2007b) Meta-analysis: Lactobacillus GG for treating acute diarrhoea in children. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 25: 871–881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Szajewska H., Skorka A., Ruszczynski M., Gieruszczak-Bialek D. (2013b) Meta-analysis: Lactobacillus GG for treating acute gastroenteritis in children – updated analysis of randomised controlled trials. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 38: 467–476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tarrerias A., Costil V., Vicari F., Letard J., Adenis-Lamarre P., Aisene A., et al. (2011) The effect of inactivated Lactobacillus LB fermented culture medium on symptom severity: observational investigation in 297 patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Dig Dis 29: 588–591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thiagarajah J.R., Mark Donowitz M., Verkman A.L. (2015) Secretory diarrhoea: mechanisms and emerging therapies. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 12: 446–457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turner J. (2009) Intestinal mucosal barrier function in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol 9: 799–809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van Baarlen P., Wells J., Kleerebezem M. (2013) Regulation of intestinal homeostasis and immunity with probiotic lactobacilli. Trends Immunol 34: 208–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vandenplas Y., Huys G., Daube G. (2015) Probiotics: an update. J Pediatr 91: 6–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Verna E., Lucak S. (2010) Use of probiotics in gastrointestinal disorders: what to recommend? Therap Adv Gastroenterol 3: 307–319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WGO (2012) World Gastroenterology Organisation global guideline: probiotics and prebiotics. J Clin Gastroenterol 46: 468–481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xiao S., Zhang D., Lu H., Jiang S., Liu H., Wang G., et al. (2003) Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of heat-killed Lactobacillus acidophilus LB in patients with chronic diarrhea. Adv Ther 20: 253–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yan F., Polk D. (2012) GG: An updated strategy to use microbial products to promote health. Funct Food Rev 4: 77–84. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yap Soo Kor J., Gwee Kok A., Chen Z., Choo T., Wong Mee L. (2010) Lactéol Fort reduces antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Singapore Families Physician 36: 46–49. [Google Scholar]



