Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 21.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Res Toxicol. 2015 Dec 3;28(12):2390–2399. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5b00401

Measurement of the Heterocyclic Amines 2-Amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole and 2-Amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine in Urine: Effects of Cigarette Smoking

Dmitri Konorev , Joseph S Koopmeiners §, Yijin Tang ||, Elizabeth A Franck Thompson , Joni A Jensen , Dorothy K Hatsukami , Robert J Turesky
PMCID: PMC4699441  NIHMSID: NIHMS747661  PMID: 26574651

Abstract

2-Amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (AαC) and 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP) are carcinogenic heterocyclic aromatic amines (HAAs) formed during the combustion of tobacco and during the high-temperature cooking of meats. Human enzymes biotransform AαC and PhIP into reactive metabolites, which can bind to DNA and lead to mutations. We sought to understand the relative contribution of smoking and diet to the exposure of AαC and PhIP, by determining levels of AαC, its ring-oxidized conjugate 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole-3-yl sulfate (AαC-3-OSO3H), and PhIP in urine of smokers on a free-choice diet before and after a six week tobacco smoking cessation study. AαC and AαC-3-OSO3H were detected in more than 90% of the urine samples of all subjects during the smoking phase. The geometric mean levels of urinary AαC during the smoking and cessation phases were 24.3 pg/mg creatinine and 3.2 pg/mg creatinine, and the geometric mean levels of AαC-3-OSO3H were 47.3 pg/mg creatinine and 3.7 pg/mg creatinine. These decreases in the mean levels of AαC and AαC-3-OSO3H were, respectively, 87% and 92%, after the cessation of tobacco (P < 0.0007). However, PhIP was detected in < 10% of the urine samples, and the exposure to PhIP was not correlated to smoking. Epidemiological studies have reported that smoking is a risk factor for cancer of the liver and gastrointestinal tract. It is noteworthy that AαC is a hepatocellular carcinogen and induces aberrant crypt foci, early biomarkers of colon cancer, in rodents. Our urinary biomarker data demonstrate that tobacco smoking is a significant source of AαC exposure. Further studies are warranted to examine the potential role of AαC as a risk factor for hepatocellular and gastrointestinal cancer in smokers.

Introduction

Heterocyclic aromatic amines (HAAs) are formed during the grilling of meats, poultry, and fish.1 Many HAAs are carcinogens in experimental animals and thus, may contribute to human cancers.1,2 While the principal source of exposure to HAAs is generally thought to occur through the diet,2,3 several HAAs are formed during the combustion of tobacco or occur in diesel exhaust.49 2-Amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (AαC) is by far the most abundant of the HAAs and structurally related aromatic amines formed in tobacco smoke.10 The levels of AαC reported in tobacco smoke range from 25 to 260 ng per cigarette.4,9,11,12 These amounts are 25–100 -fold higher than the levels of 4-aminobiphenyl (4-ABP) and the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon, benzo[a]pyrene, and comparable to the levels of 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) that occur in tobacco smoke.1315 4-ABP, benzo[a]pyrene, and NNK are recognized as human carcinogens.16,17 There is one report on the identification of PhIP in tobacco smoke with levels ranging from 11 to 23 ng/cigarette.7 Furthermore, PhIP has been implicated as a major DNA-damaging agent in the urine of smokers, based on 32P-postlabeling analysis of urinary mutagens.18

Epidemiological studies have consistently reported that smoking is a risk factor for cancer of gastrointestinal tract19 and hepatocellular carcinoma;20,21 however, the chemicals in tobacco smoke responsible for these cancers are unknown. AαC induces aberrant crypt foci, an early biomarker of neoplasia, in colon of mice,22 and AαC is a potent lacI transgene colon mutagen in mice.23 Mice exposed to AαC also develop hepatocellular carcinoma.24 PhIP is a pancreatic and colon carcinogen in rats.1,25 Human hepatocytes efficiently transform AαC and PhIP to their genotoxic N-hydroxylated metabolites, 2-hydroxamino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (HONH-AαC) and 2-hydroxamino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (HONH-PhIP), which bind to DNA and induce mutations.26,27 Thus, AαC and PhIP present in tobacco smoke could contribute to DNA damage and the risk of developing cancer of the liver and digestive tract in smokers.

Urine is a useful biological matrix for the screening of hazardous chemicals and their metabolites, since large quantities can be obtained noninvasively. Many biomarkers of tobacco-associated carcinogens have been measured in urine.16 We previously identified AαC in urine of adult men of the Shanghai Cohort study.28 The findings showed that AαC represented a major HAA exposure and that tobacco smoke was an important point source of their AαC exposure. The number of cigarettes smoked per day was positively and significantly related to urinary levels of AαC in study subjects. The relative contribution of tobacco smoke and the diet as sources of exposure to AαC and PhIP in the United States is not known. In this study, we measured urinary levels of AαC, its ring-oxidized conjugate, 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole-3-yl sulfate (AαC-3-OSO3H), and PhIP in a group of smokers in the United States who underwent a tobacco cessation program.

Materials and Methods

Caution

HAAs and derivatives are hazardous and should be handled with caution and with appropriate clothing.

Study subjects

Thirty compliant volunteers were selected from a completed smoking cessation conducted at the University of Minnesota Transdisciplinary Tobacco Use Research Center, Minneapolis, MN. The full details of the treatment and cessation program were reported.29 The selected group was comprised of 13 females and 17 males. Three of the subjects were African American and the remaining volunteers were Caucasians. The volunteers smoked their own preferred brand of cigarettes ad libitum during the baseline 2 week smoking phase. The mean number of cigarettes smoked per day (CPD) was 23.8 ± 6.4. First morning void urine samples were collected at the end of the two week baseline smoking phase. Thereafter, the subjects participated in a six week program, where either low yield nicotine cigarettes (0.3 mg or 0.05 mg nicotine per cig, Quest cigarettes, manufactured by Vector; Vector Tobacco Inc., Durham, NC) or nicotine lozenges (4 mg) were provided to relieve the acute effects of cigarette withdrawal. Thereafter, the usage of all treatment products ceased for a period of 6 weeks, and spot urine samples were obtained for chemical analysis the end of this cessation period. Urinary cotinine was measured to confirm that subjects had successfully refrained from smoking.29 The goal of this study was to assess the level of exposure to AαC and PhIP during smoking and cessation phases. Since the combustion of low nicotine cigarettes are still expected produce AαC and PhIP, the measurement of these HAAs in urine of the volunteers was restricted to the baseline smoking phase and following the 6 week period where all treatment products had ceased.

Chemicals and reagents

ACS grade ethyl acetate and formic acid and reagent grade sodium hydroxide were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St Louis, MO). LC/MS grade water, methanol, acetonitrile and formic acid and OPTIMA LCMS grade ammonium hydroxide were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA). AαC, PhIP, and 2-amino-1-trideuteromethyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine ([2H3C]-PhIP) were purchased from Toronto Research Chemicals (Toronto, Canada). [4b,5,6,7,8,8a-13C6]-AαC was a kind gift of Dr. Daniel Doerge, National Center for Toxicological Research (Jefferson, AR). Liver microsomes from rats pretreated with polychlorinated biphenyls were purchased from Molecular Toxicology, Inc. (Boone, NC). SOLA SCX SPE cartridges (10 mg/mL) were purchased from Thermo Scientific (Bellefonte, PA). Oasis WAX SPE cartridge (30 mg/mL) were purchased from Waters (Milford, MA).

NMR Characterization of AαC Metabolites

1H-NMR resonance assignments for the metabolites of AαC were conducted at 25 °C with a Bruker Avance III 600 MHz spectrometer equipped with a triple resonance cryoprobe (Bruker BioSpin Corp., Billerica, MA). The 1H chemical shifts were referenced directly from the DMSO-d6 multiplet at 2.50 ppm.

Biosynthesis of 2-Amino-3-Hydroxy-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (AαC-3-OH)

AαC-3-OH was prepared enzymatically by incubation of liver microsomes (1 mg protein/mL) of rats pretreated with polychlorinated biphenyls with cofactors and AαC (200 μM) for 1 h at 37 °C as previously described.30 The microsomal protein was precipitated with 1 vol of CH3OH, and the supernatant was diluted with 10 vol H2O. 3-HO-AαC was enriched by solid phase extraction with a C18 resin, followed by purification with an HPLC Agilent 1260 Infinity HPLC (Santa Clara, CA) equipped with a UV photodiode array detector. A Thermo Aquasil C18 reversed-phase column (4.6 x 250 mm, 5 μm particle size, Bellefonte, PA) was employed for isolation of the desired product. A linear gradient starting from 99% A (10 mM NH4CH3CO2 in H2O) and 1%B: (100% CH3CN) and arriving at 100% B over 20 min at a flow rate of 1 mL/min.31 The desired metabolite was dried in vacuo. The proton assignments were: δ 10.92 (s, 1H, H-N9) 7.79 (d, 7.67 Hz, 1H, H-5); 7.53 (s, 1H, H-4); 7.34 (d, 7.97 Hz, 1H, H-8), 7.19 (dd, 7.55, 7.97 Hz, 1H, H-7), 7.06 (dd, 7.55, 7.67 Hz, 1H, H-6), 5.75 (s, 2H, NH2). Full scan spectra under ESI/MS conditions with the TSQ showed the protonated molecule [M+H]+ at m/z 200.1.

Synthesis of 2-Amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole-3-yl sulfate (AαC-3-OSO3H)

AαC or [13C6]-AαC (0.35 μmol) in C2H5OH (100 μL) was reacted with a 1.2-fold molar excess of potassium persulfate in 0.4N NaOH, (0.4 mL).32 The mixture was placed in a thermomixer at 37 °C and agitated at 650 rpm for two h before neutralization with 1N HCl. The products were purified via the Agilent 1260 Infinity HPLC system and chromatographic conditions as described above for 3-HO-AαC. The desired product was collected and vacuumed centrifuged to dryness. The AαC-3-OSO3H was dissolved in CH3OH, and the concentration was determined by UV spectroscopy with an Agilent 8453 UV spectrophotometer employing a molar extinction coefficient ε (M−1 cm−1) = 21,563 at λ335 nm. The yield in product ranged between 10 – 20%. The 1H NMR spectrum of AαC-3-OSO3H is in agreement to that of the previously biosynthesized product:33 (1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 11.64 (s, 1H, H-N9) 8.28 (s, 1H, H-4); 8.00 (d, 7.67 Hz, 1H, H-5); 7.50 (d, 8.00 Hz, 1H, H-8); 7.35 (dd, 7.55, 8.00 Hz, 1H, H-7), 7.22 (dd, 7.55, 7.67 Hz, 1H, H-6). Due to rapid exchange with the sulfate group, the NH2 signal was not detected. Full scan spectra with the TSQ showed the protonated molecule [M+H]+ at m/z 280.1 and in negative ion mode the deprotonated molecule [M-H] was observed at m/z 278.1.

Isolation of AαC and PhIP from Urine

The isolation procedure followed that of our previous method except that a fritless SOLA SCX SPE cartridge was employed for isolation of HAAs. Urine (0.5 mL) was spiked with [13C6]-AαC and [2H3C]-PhIP (25 pg) and made alkaline with 10N NaOH (0.055 mL). The samples were heated at 37 °C in a thermo-mixer at 450 rpm for 2 h to deconjugate metabolites.28 After cooling, samples were extracted twice with two volumes of ethyl acetate. The organic fractions were acidified with HCO2H (2% v/v), and applied to SOLA SCX SPE cartridges, which were pre-washed with CH3OH/5% NH4OH followed by H2O/2% HCO2H before loading samples. Cartridges were washed in series with 1 mL volumes of H2O/2% HCO2H twice, followed by CH3OH/2% HCO2H, then H2O, and finally with 40% CH3OH/5% NH4OH. Thereafter, the analytes were eluted with CH3OH/5% NH4OH and collected into Eppendorf tubes and dried by vacuum centrifugation at 43 °C. The samples were reconstituted in H2O/0.01% HCOOH (50 μL) and centrifuged at 21,000 x g for three min before transferring to silylated glass conical capLC sample vials (Wheaton, Microliter vials, Millville, NJ).

Isolation of AαC-3-OSO3H from Urine

[13C6]-AαC-3-OSO3H (500 pg) was added to urine (0.5 mL). The samples were acidified with CH3CO2H (2% v/v), followed by two volumes of CH3OH to precipitate salt and protein. Samples were placed on ice for 30 min before centrifugation at 17,000 x g for 10 min. The supernatant was applied to an Oasis WAX SPE cartridge, which was pre-washed with CH3OH/5% NH4OH, followed by H2O/2% HCO2H before loading samples. Cartridges were washed in series with 1 mL of H2O/2% HCO2H (twice), followed by CH3OH/2% HCO2H, H2O, and finally 40% CH3OH/5% NH4OH. AαC-3-OSO3H and its internal standard were eluted with CH3OH/5% NH4OH and collected into Eppendorf tubes, followed by vacuum centrifugation to dryness as described above. The samples were reconstituted in 5 mM NH4HCO3 (pH 9.0) (50 μL), followed by addition of chloroform (5 μL). Samples were vortexed and then sonicated with a Branson CPX 3800 ultrasonic cleaner for 10 min, and then centrifuged at 21,000 x g for three min. The supernatant was transferred into a 300 μL polypropylene capLC vial (ChromTech, Apple Valley, MN).

Method Validation and Calibration Curves

The performance of the method was determined by inter-day and intra-day estimates of the levels of urinary biomarkers. The samples were assayed in quadruplicate on four different days. The limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), the within-day and between-day reproducibility were performed by spiking pooled urine samples from four non-smokers who had refrained from eating well-done cooked meat.34 AαC or PhIP was spiked into urine at levels of 10 or 30 pg/mL, and AαC-3-OSO3H was spiked at a level of 100 or 500 pg/mL. Based upon recommended guidelines for data acquisition and quality evaluation in environmental chemistry, the values of the LOD and LOQ for analytes were set at 3σ and 10σ SD units above the background level signal of an uncontaminated matrix.35

A combined calibration curve was constructed for AαC and PhIP, and an independent curve was constructed for AαC-3-OSO3H. The same urine samples pooled from four non-smoking volunteers who had refrained from eating well-done cooked meat were used for method validation and constructing the calibration curves.34 The matrix was verified to be free of HAA analytes by LC/MS (data not shown). Data were fitted to a straight line (area of response of analyte/internal standard versus the amount of analyte/internal standard) using ordinary least-squares with equal weightings. A seven-point calibration curve was established containing HAA biomarkers at concentrations ranging from 0, 2.5 to 50 pg/mL urine for AαC and PhIP, and a 9-point calibration curve ranging from 0, 20 to 1000 pg/mL urine was created for AαC-3-OSO3H. Analytes were added to urine extracts following SPE. All calibration points were done in triplicate.

Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry (UPLC/MS2)

The chromatographic separation of AαC and PhIP was performed with a Waters NanoAcquity UPLC system with a Magic C18AQ reversed-phase column (0.3 x 150 mm, 3 μm particle size, 100 Å pore size) (Michrom Corp., Auburn, CA) and heated to 50 °C. The flow rate was set to 6 μL/min. A linear gradient 10 min was employed, starting at 90% A (H2O/0.01% HCO2H) and 10% B solvent (CH3CN/0.01% HCO2H) and ended at 100% B. The same UPLC system was employed for AαC-3-OSO3H, but used a BEH130 C18 reversed-phase column (0.3 x 100 mm, 1.7 μm particle size, 130 Å pore size) (Waters Corp) heated to 50 °C. The flow rate was set at 5 μL/min. A 10 min linear gradient was employed and started at 90% A (5 mM NH4HCO3, pH 9.0) and 10% B (CH3CN) and ended at 100% B.

The mass spectral data were acquired with TSQ Quantiva triple stage quadrupole (TSQ) mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA) employing the HESI II source in the positive ionization mode. The instrument tune parameters for AαC and PhIP were as follows: 3.3 kV source spray voltage, 70 °C vaporizer temperature, sheath gas setting of 3 (arbitrary units), auxiliary gas 1 (arbitrary units), and no sweep gas. The ion transfer tube temperature was 400 °C. The tune method for AαC-3-OSO3H used a 3.2 kV source spray voltage; the other parameters were identical to those employed for AαC and PhIP.

The selected reaction monitoring (SRM) mode was used to measure HAA biomarkers. Each SRM transition was independently optimized, with collision energies ranging from 29 – 48 V. The dwell time was 100 ms for each transition of AαC and PhIP. The resolution of Q1 and Q3 was set at 0.7 resolution (FWHM). The RF lens offset was 95 V for AαC and 120 V for PhIP. There was no in-source CID offset voltage. The quantification of AαC ([M + H]+ at m/z 184) was done using the transition 184.1 → 140.1 ([M + H]+ → [M + H – NH3 - HCN]+. Two additional qualifier transitions were used to corroborate the purity of AαC at m/z 167.1 ([M + H]+ → [M + H – NH3]+ and m/z 113.1 ([M + H]+ → [M + H – NH3 -2HCN]+). PhIP ([M + H]+ at m/z 225.1) was measured by the transition 225.1 → 210.1 [M + H]+ → [M + H – CH3]+, and the transition 225.1 → 140.1 [M + H]+ → [M + H – C3H7N3]+ was used as a qualifier ion. For AαC-3-OSO3H ([M + H]+ at m/z 280.1), the RF lens offset was set at 107 V and an elevated in-source CID voltage offset of 60 V was employed to cause the loss of SO3 moiety (−80 Da) in the source. The transition of the resultant AαC-3-OH ([M + H – SO3]+ at m/z 200.1) was subjected to CID, and the transition 200.1 → 155.1 ([M + H – SO3]+ → [M + H – SO3 - CO - NH3]+ was used for quantitation. The qualifier transitions 200.1 → 128.1 ([M + H – SO3]+ → [M + H – SO3 - CO - NH3 - HCN]+) and 200.1 → 101.1 ([M + H – SO3]+ → [M + H – SO3 - CO - NH3 - 2HCN]+) were used to confirm the analyte purity. Full scan product ion spectra were acquired on AαC employing a collision energy ramp of 20 – 55 V and for AαC-3-OH spectra were acquired at 40 V collision energy. The scanning for both molecules was from m/z 100 – 300.

Statistical Analyses

The paired t-test or linear regression was performed on tobacco-associated urinary biomarkers using GraphPad Prism (v. 6) for Windows, GraphPad Prism Software (San Diego, CA). A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

We employed our previously established a tandem solvent/SPE method to isolate AαC and PhIP from human urine; the LOQ values are 2.5 pg/mL for both HAAs.36 In this study, we also developed a method to monitor AαC-3-SO3H, a sulfate conjugate of 3-HO-AαC, which is one of the major metabolites of AαC formed by human liver microsomes.37 A mixed-mode weak anion exchange resin was successfully employed to isolate AαC-3-SO3H from urine. The LOD and LOQ values for AαC-3-SO3H, following in-source fragmentation of the sulfate bond to form AαC-3-OH, were 9.0 and 23.3 pg/mL urine. These values were set at 3σ and 10σ SD units above the signals of unspiked urine samples obtained from volunteers who did not smoke and had refrained from eating well-done cooked beef.34,35 The data on the precision and reproducibility of the urinary measurements of AαC and AαC-3-SO3H are summarized in Table 1. The validation of the method was previously reported for PhIP.36 The calibration curves are provided in Supporting Information, Figure S-1.

Table 1.

Within-day and between-day estimates of AαC and AαC-3-OSO3H (pg/mL urine) spiked in urine.a

AαC (pg/mL urine) Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 CV (%)within- day CV (%)between- day
Mean 10.0 13.4 11.7 13.3 12.2 10.7 11.6
SD 2.9 1.9 1.4 0.64
RSD (%) 21.3 16.7 10.9 5.5
Mean 30.0 34.9 32.2 36.23 31.3 7.0 9.9
SD 0.8 1.1 1.8 4.1
RSD (%) 2.3 3.4 4.8 12.1
AαC-3- OSO3H (pg/mL urine) Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 CV (%)within- day CV (%)between- day
Mean 100.0 97.9 84.7 104.7 101.4 8.7 12.7
SD 12.0 12.0 2.1 3.0
RSD (%) 12.2 14.1 2.0 3.0
Mean 500.0 512 609 514 493 6.4 12.5
SD 26.4 21.0 15.1 51.7
RSD (%) 5.2 3.4 2.9 10.5
a

The HAA biomarkers were isolated from urine on 4 different days (n=4 samples per day) and assayed by UPLC/MS2.

Identification of Urinary Biomarkers of HAAs During Baseline Smoking Phase and Six Weeks Following Tobacco Cessation

Representative UPLC/MS2 chromatograms of AαC present in urine during the smoking phase and 6 weeks after cessation of tobacco usage are shown in shown in Figure 2. The purity of the peak attributed to AαC was shown by the qualifier ions at m/z 167.1 and 113.1, attributed to [M + H – NH3]+ and [M + H – NH3 – 2HCN]+, which were within 20% of the relative abundance of ions observed for the pure standard.38 The full scan product ion spectrum, which was in excellent agreement to the spectrum obtained for synthetic AαC, confirmed the identity of the analyte (Figure 2 right panel).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

UPLC/MS2 analysis of AαC during the baseline smoking phase and 6 weeks after cessation of tobacco and product ion spectra of analyte and synthetic AαC standard.

The analysis of AαC-3-OSO3H in urine, by tandem MS with the TSQ, was analytically challenging because of isobaric interferences. Initially, AαC-3-OSO3- (m/z 278.1) was assayed in the negative ionization mode, by monitoring the transition 278.1 → 198.1, attributed to the loss of SO3.39 However, isobaric interferences were extensive and precluded measurement with this transition (Figure 3A). Surprisingly, the signal for protonated AαC-3-OSO3H (m/z 280.1) in positive ionization mode was relatively strong; however, the transition 280.0 → 200.1, also due to loss of SO3, lacked specificity and could not be employed for measurement (Figure 3B). Subsequently, a “pseudo MS3” scan in the positive ionization mode was conducted, by applying an elevated voltage to the skimmer that resulted in the in-source fragmentation of the sulfate bond of AαC-3-OSO3H, to produce protonated AαC-3-OH ([M + H]+ at m/z 200.1) (Figure 3C). The “pseudo MS3” scan method was selected to measure AαC-3-OSO3H, by the monitoring the transition of AαC-3-OH (200.1 → 155.1, the loss of CO + NH3). Representative UPLC-ESI/MS2 chromatograms depicting AαC-3-OSO3H in a urine of a smoker during the smoking phase and 6 weeks after cessation of tobacco are shown in Figure 4. The product ion spectrum confirmed the structure of AαC-3-OH: prominent ions observed at m/z 155.1 ([M + H – NH3 – CO]+), m/z 128.1 ([M + H – NH3 – CO - HCN]+), and m/z 101.1 ([M + H – NH3 – CO - 2HCN]+). The spectrum was identical to that of the biosynthesized AαC-3-OH (data not shown).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

UPLC/MS2 analysis of AαC-3-SO3H in urine of a subject who ate well-done cooked meat. (A) negative ion mode (278.1 → 198.1), (B) positive ion mode (280.1 → 200.1), and (C) positive ion mode, following in-source CID to fragment AαC-3-SO3H to AαC-3-OH, and monitoring the transition 200.1 → 155.1, attributed to the loss of CO and NH3 from protonated AαC-3-OH.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

UPLC/MS2 analysis of AαC-3-SO3H during the baseline smoking phase and 6 weeks after cessation of tobacco, and the product ion spectra of the analyte and synthetic AαC-3-OSO3H standard, following in-source CID to fragment AαC-3-OSO3H to AαC-3-OH

Urinary Levels of AαC, AαC-3-OSO3H, and PhIP in Volunteers of the Tobacco Cessation Study

AαC and AαC-3-OSO3H were successfully measured in urine of twenty-eight out of the 30 subjects. Isobaric interferences in urine precluded measurements in two subjects during both smoking and cessation phases. Creatinine was not measured in urine of a third subject, hence the data on urinary levels of AαC, when normalized to pg/mg creatinine, are reported on 27 subjects. The linear regression curve showing the correlation between the levels of AαC and AαC-3-OSO3H in urine during the smoking phase is shown in Figure 5. The urinary levels of AαC and AαC-3-OSO3H were highly correlated during the smoking phase (p < 0.0007, correlation coefficient r = 0.64, 95% CI of slope: 0.4247, 1.371). The slope of the curve reveals that the amount of AαC, which is a mixture of unmetabolized AαC and its hydrolyzed conjugates, is comparable to the amount of AαC-3-OSO3H in urine of smokers.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Linear regression curve (dashed lines 95% CI) of the levels of AαC and AαC-3-OSO3H during the baseline smoking phase.

The histograms depicting the concentrations of AαC and AαC-3-OSO3H in urine of all 28 subjects during the smoking and cessation phases are shown in Figure 6, and the scatter dot plots of the urinary levels of cotinine and AαC during the smoking and cessation phases are summarized in Figure 7. The geometric mean level of cotinine was 4684 ng/mg creatinine (95% CI: 3644, 5723) during the baseline smoking phase and decreased by >98% to a mean of 74 ng/mg creatinine (95% CI: 15, 134) six weeks following cessation of smoking (Figure 7). These differences in urinary mean levels of cotinine are highly significant (paired t-test, p <0.0001), and confirm that the subjects had abstained from smoking during the cessation period. AαC was above the LOQ in twenty-eight of the subjects during the smoking phase (Figures 6 and 7): the geometric mean concentration of AαC in urine was 24.3 pg/mg creatinine (95% CI: 19, 35), and it decreased to a level of 3.2 pg/mg creatinine (95% CI: 1.8, 5.5), following the six week cessation period. The difference in geometric mean levels of urinary AαC between the smoking and cessation phases was highly significant (paired t-test, p < 0.0001). The levels of AαC in urine were still above the LOQ in fifteen out of the 28 subjects 6 weeks following abstinence from smoking, and two of the subjects had relatively high levels of AαC (32 and 118 pg/mg creatinine) in urine. These data demonstrate that smoking is a major source of exposure to AαC for the majority of volunteers.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Urinary levels of AαC and AαC-3-SO3H during the baseline smoking phase and 6 weeks after cessation of tobacco.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Scatter dot plots of the levels of cotinine and AαC (showing the geometric mean and 95% CI) during the baseline smoking phase and 6 weeks after cessation of tobacco.

The geometric mean urinary level of AαC-3-OSO3H during the smoking phase was 47.3 pg/mg creatinine (95% CI: 36 – 63) and decreased to a level of 3.7 pg/mg creatinine (95% CI: 2.1, 6.5) 6 weeks after cessation of tobacco usage. The difference in the geometric mean levels of AαC-3-OSO3H between the smoking and cessation phases was highly significant (paired t-test, p < 0.0007). AαC-3-OSO3H was above the LOD in four subjects and above the LOQ only in two subjects 6 weeks after cessation of tobacco. The two subjects (Subjects 3 and 8) harboring very high levels of AαC-3-OSO3H (~200 pg/mg creatinine) were the same subjects who had high amounts of AαC in their urine postcessation of tobacco. The infrequent detection of AαC-3-OSO3H in many of these urine samples postcessation of tobacco usage may be attributed to the 9-fold higher LOQ value of AαC-3-OSO3H than the value of AαC.

PhIP, in contrast to AαC, was detected in urine of only four subjects during the smoking phase (3.4, 8.1, 13.3, and 18.0 pg/mg creatinine); these subjects were not positive for PhIP after cessation (Supporting Information, Figure S-2). Two other subjects harbored PhIP at levels above the LOQ (3.0 and 7.1 pg/mg creatinine) after cessation of tobacco, but neither subject contained detectable levels of PhIP during the smoking phase.

Discussion

There are several reports on the assessment of exposures to aromatic amines, including o-toluidine, 4-ABP, and 2-naphthylamine, by measurement of these carcinogens in urine of nonsmokers, smokers, or occupationally exposed workers.4044 The estimates of the arylamines in urine vary widely among the different laboratories. The levels of o-toluidine in urine of smokers and nonsmokers are reported to be as high as 6300 ng/24 h urine collection.40 The mean levels of 4-ABP in urine of nonsmokers and smokers ranged, respectively, between 5.6 ng/24 h and 17.3 ng/24 h urine collection,43 a second study reported means levels of 4-ABP at 9.6 and 15.3 ng/24 h urine collection for nonsmokers and smokers;42 a third study reported 4-ABP at levels ranging from 68 ng/24 h and 79 ng/24 h, respectively, in nonsmokers and smokers.41 2-Naphthylamine was reported at mean levels as high as 2100 ng/L and 3900 ng/L of urine of nonsmokers and smokers.44 Some of these studies employed HPLC with electrochemical detection or gas chromatography with electron capture detector for detection, and employed surrogate external standards for quantification. These methods are less precise than MS-based methods which employ stable, isotopically labeled internal standards for identification and quantification. Moreover, the peak purity and identity of the analytes are equivocal in the earlier studies that did not employ MS, and the estimates of aromatic amine concentrations in urine may be inaccurate. Many of these analyses were performed following acid or base treatment, or by enzyme treatment of urine with β-glucuronidase/arylsulfatase to hydrolyze metabolic conjugates to the parent amines. These different types of treatments may have selectively hydrolyzed different types of conjugates and recovered different amounts of the parent amines.

The data reported in the literature on urinary biomarkers of tobacco-associated HAAs are limited to two reports.28,45 We previously identified AαC in urine of adult men of the Shanghai Cohort study.28 The number of cigarettes smoked per day was positively and significantly related to urinary levels of AαC in the study subjects: the mean level of AαC in non-hydrolyzed urine of subjects who smoked greater than 20 cig/day was 11.9 pg/mg creatinine (9.2 pg/mL urine), and the mean level in nonsmokers urine was 2.54 pg/mg creatinine (2.2 pg/mL urine).28 AαC was detected in 51% of the smokers and 19% of the non-smokers. Smoking and not cooked meat was the major source of AαC exposure.

In our current tobacco cessation study conducted in the United States, the subjects smoked an average 24 ± 6 CPD. During the baseline smoking phase, the mean urinary level of AαC was 35 ± 29 pg/mg creatinine (46 ± 41 pg/mL urine), and the mean level dropped to 8 ± 23 pg/mg creatinine (9 ± 18 pg/mL) six weeks following the cessation of tobacco usage. We treated urine specimens with base, which increased the amounts of AαC recovered from urine by about 3-fold.28 The increase in AαC content may be attributed to the hydrolysis of the N-acetyl metabolite of AαC33 which would explain the higher mean levels of AαC observed in the study subjects of the United States compared to the subjects of the Shanghai cohort.28 However, the levels of AαC present in different brands of cigarettes can vary by 10-fold and impact the levels of AαC in urine.4,9,11,12 Acid treatment of urine (2N HCl at 70 °C for 6 h) recovers up to 10-fold higher amounts of AαC compared to non-hydrolyzed urine;28 these acidic conditions hydrolyze the N2-glucuronide conjugate of AαC,31 but interfering isobaric components are formed during the hydrolysis and impede reliable measurement of AαC in many acid-treated urine samples by TSQ/MS (unpublished observations, R. Turesky). Thus, the total amount of AαC and its conjugates in urine is probably several fold higher than the actual levels measured in our study.

The mean level of urinary cotinine decreased by more than 98% following 6 weeks of abstinence from smoking, yet AαC was still detected above the LOQ value in 50% of the subjects. We cannot exclude the possibility that the subjects were exposed to low levels of second-hand smoke. However, AαC occurs an atmospheric pollutant,6 and it also forms in well-done cooked meats and charred vegetables,5,46 which may have contributed to the non-tobacco associated exposure to AαC.

A recently published study confirmed our previous findings that AαC is present urine of smokers and nonsmokers in China,28 with approximately a 2.5 fold higher level of AαC present in urine of smokers than nonsmokers (20 vs 8 pg/mg creatinine).45 The authors also reported that 2-amino-1,6-dimethylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (DMIP), an HAA with a similar heterocyclic structure to PhIP, was detected at ~2-fold higher levels in urine of smokers than nonsmokers. In contrast, the amounts and frequency of PhIP detected in urine of smokers were comparable to nonsmokers, and urinary concentrations of PhIP hovered just above the LOQ value (4.3 pg/mL). Creatinine, which is an abundant amino acid present in animal proteins and fish muscle,47 is thought to be a critical precursor in the formation of DMIP and PhIP during the high-temperature cooking of meats and poultry.48 However, these nitrogenous chemicals occur at low levels in soils and plants.49 To our knowledge, the amounts of creatine/creatinine have not been reported in tobacco plants. Thus, it is surprising to find PhIP and possibly DMIP are present in cigarette smoke condensate.11 PhIP was infrequently detected in urine specimens of smokers from the greater Minneapolis metropolis even though the LOQ value for PhIP is very low (2.5 pg/mL urine). PhIP is extensively metabolized in humans, and on average, less than 1% of the ingested dose of PhIP is eliminated in urine of omnivores, and PhIP is often undetectable in urine.34,50 Thus, urinary PhIP is not a sensitive biomarker, and several of its urinary metabolites34 may be superior biomarkers to assess exposure to this procarcinogen from tobacco smoke.

The ring-oxidized sulfate conjugate, AαC-3-OSO3H, was also frequently detected in urine of subjects during the smoking phase. Human P450s catalyze the oxidation of AαC to form AαC-3-OH and the HONH-AαC.37 P450-mediated ring-oxidation is viewed as a pathway of detoxication of HAAs, whereas P450-mediated N-oxidation of the exocyclic amine group to form HONH-AαC is considered the pathway of bioactivation.37 The AαC-3-OSO3H in urine may represent a pathway of detoxication, but the metabolite also may form as a rearrangement product of the reactive N-sulfooxy-2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (N-sulfooxy-AαC) intermediate, a penultimate metabolite of AαC that reacts with DNA (Scheme 1).51,52 AαC-3-OSO3H is prepared synthetically by the Boyland-Sims persulfate oxidation of AαC under alkaline pH conditions.32 Based on studies with arylamines, the Boyland-Sims reaction occurs by a nucleophilic displacement by the arylamine nitrogen on the peroxide oxygen to form an intermediate arylhydroxylamine-O-sulfonate, which rearranges to form the o-arylaminesulfate.32,53 The synthesis of AαC-3-OSO3H likely occurs through the N-sulfooxy-AαC intermediate, with subsequent rearrangement to AαC-3-OSO3H (Scheme 1). Future studies are required to determine if AαC-3-OSO3H formed in vivo represents a biomarker of bioactivation or detoxication of AαC.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Mechanism of AαC-3-OSO3H formation through sulfation of 3-HO-AαC or by rearrangement of N-sulfooxy-AαC.

Epidemiological studies have reported that smoking is a risk factor for cancer of the liver and gastrointestinal tract, but the causative agents are uncertain.19,21 Apart from the endocyclic nitrogen atoms, AαC has the same chemical structure as 2-aminofluorene, one of the most well-studied carcinogenic aromatic amines over the past 60 years.54 AαC induces aberrant crypt foci, early biomarkers of colon cancer,22 induces lacI transgene mutations in colon of mice,23 and induces hepatocellular carcinomas in rats.1 Moreover, AαC undergoes extensive bioactivation of by human hepatocytes to form persistent DNA adducts,26,55 suggesting that AαC can contribute to DNA damage liver and gastrointestinal tract of smokers. Given the relatively high amounts of AαC present in tobacco smoke, further studies on the potential role of AαC in tobacco-associated cancers are warranted.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Chemical structures of AαC, AαC-3-OSO3H, and PhIP.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Grants P50 DA013333 (D.H.), R01CA134700 (R.J.T.) and Cancer Center Support Grant CA-77598 (R.J.T.) from the National Cancer Institute.

The comments of Dr. Stephen Hecht, Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, are greatly appreciated. We acknowledge the assistance of Dr. David LeMaster of the NMR Structural Biology Facility at the Wadsworth Center.

Abbreviations

B[a]P

benzo[a]pyrene

NNK

4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone

NNAL

4AαC, 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole

AαC-3-OH

2-amino-3-hydroxy-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole

AαC-3-OSO3H

2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole-3-yl sulfate

HONH-AαC

2-hydroxyamino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole

N-sulfooxy-AαC

N-sulfooxy-2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole

PhIP

2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine

HONH-PhIP

2-hydroxyamino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine

CID

collision-induced dissociation

CPD

cigarettes smoked per day

ESI

electrospray ionization

HAA

heterocyclic aromatic amine

HPLC

high pressure liquid chromatography

LOD

limit of detection

LOQ

limit of quantification

SPE

solid phase extraction

SRM

selected reaction monitoring

SCX

strong cation exchange

TSQ

triple stage quadrupole

UPLC/MS2

ultraperformance liquid chromatograph/tandem mass spectrometry

WAX

weak anion exchange

Footnotes

*

Supporting Information

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: Figure S-1. Calibration curves of AαC, AαC-3-OSO3H, and PhIP and Figure S-2 UPLC/MS2 analysis of urinary PhIP during smoking and cessation of tobacco.

References

  • 1.Sugimura T, Wakabayashi K, Nakagama H, Nagao M. Heterocyclic amines: Mutagens/carcinogens produced during cooking of meat and fish. Cancer Sci. 2004;95:290–299. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2004.tb03205.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Knize MG, Felton JS. Formation and human risk of carcinogenic heterocyclic amines formed from natural precursors in meat. Nutr Rev. 2005;63:158–165. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2005.tb00133.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zheng W, Lee SA. Well-done meat intake, heterocyclic amine exposure, and cancer risk. Nutr Cancer. 2009;61:437–446. doi: 10.1080/01635580802710741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yoshida D, Matsumoto T. Amino-alpha-carbolines as mutagenic agents in cigarette smoke condensate. Cancer Lett. 1980;10:141–149. doi: 10.1016/0304-3835(80)90037-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Matsumoto T, Yoshida D, Tomita H. Determination of mutagens, amino-alpha-carbolines in grilled foods and cigarette smoke condensate. Cancer Lett. 1981;12:105–110. doi: 10.1016/0304-3835(81)90045-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Manabe S, Izumikawa S, Asakuno K, Wada O, Kanai Y. Detection of carcinogenic amino-alpha-carbolines and amino-gamma-carbolines in diesel-exhaust particles. Environ Pollut. 1991;70:255–265. doi: 10.1016/0269-7491(91)90013-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Manabe S, Kurihara N, Wada O, Izumikawa S, Asakuno K, Morita M. Detection of a carcinogen, 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo [4,5-b]pyridine, in airborne particles and diesel-exhaust particles. Environ Pollut. 1993;80:281–286. doi: 10.1016/0269-7491(93)90049-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhang Liqin, Ashley David L, Watson Clifford H. Quantitative Analysis of Six Heterocyclic Aromatic Amines in Mainstream Cigarette Smoke Condensate Using Isotope Dilution Liquid Chromatography–Electrospray Ionization Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2011;13:120–126. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Smith CJ, Qian X, Zha Q, Moldoveanu SC. Analysis of alpha- and beta-carbolines in mainstream smoke of reference cigarettes by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 2004;1046:211–216. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.06.082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hoffmann D. Letters to the editor: Tobacco smoke components. Beitr„ge zur Tabakforschung Int. 1998;18:49–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Manabe S, Tohyama K, Wada O, Aramaki T. Detection of a carcinogen, 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine, in cigarette smoke condensate. Carcinogenesis. 1991;12:1945–1947. doi: 10.1093/carcin/12.10.1945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhang L, Ashley DL, Watson CH. Quantitative analysis of six heterocyclic aromatic amines in mainstream cigarette smoke condensate using isotope dilution liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Nicotine Tob Res. 2011;13:120–126. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Patrianakos C, Hoffmann D. Chemical studies on tobacco smoke LXIV. On the analysis of aromatic amines in cigarette smoke. J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1979;3:150–154. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zha Q, Qian NX, Moldoveanu SC. Analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the particulate phase of cigarette smoke using a gas chromatographic-high-resolution mass spectrometric technique. J Chromatogr Sci. 2002;40:403–408. doi: 10.1093/chromsci/40.7.403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hecht SS. Research opportunities related to establishing standards for tobacco products under the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012;14:18–28. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hecht SS. Human urinary carcinogen metabolites: biomarkers for investigating tobacco and cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2002;23:907–922. doi: 10.1093/carcin/23.6.907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans (2012). Personal habits and indoor combustions. 100E. Lyon, France: 2012. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Peluso M, Castegnaro M, Malaveille C, Friesen M, Garren L, Hautefeuille A, Vineis P, Kadlubar F, Bartsch H. 32 P-Postlabelling analysis of urinary mutagens from smokers of black tobacco implicates 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP) as a major DNA-damaging agent. Carcinogenesis. 1991;12:713–717. doi: 10.1093/carcin/12.4.713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Giovannucci E. An updated review of the epidemiological evidence that cigarette smoking increases risk of colorectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001;10:725–731. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lee YC, Cohet C, Yang YC, Stayner L, Hashibe M, Straif K. Meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies on cigarette smoking and liver cancer. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38:1497–1511. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Vineis P, Alavanja M, Buffler P, Fontham E, Franceschi S, Gao YT, Gupta PC, Hackshaw A, Matos E, Samet J, Sitas F, Smith J, Stayner L, Straif K, Thun MJ, Wichmann HE, Wu AH, Zaridze D, Peto R, Doll R. Tobacco and cancer: recent epidemiological evidence. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:99–106. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Okonogi H, Ushijima T, Shimizu H, Sugimura T, Nagao M. Induction of aberrant crypt foci in C57BL/6N mice by 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (AalphaC) and 2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline (MeIQx) Cancer Lett. 1997;111:105–109. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3835(96)04505-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhang Xue Bin, Felton James S, Tucker JamesD, Urlando Cesare, Heddle John A. Intestinal mutagenicity of two carcinogenic food mutagens in transgenic mice: 2-amino-l-methyl-6-phenylimidazo [4,5-b] pyridine and amino(α)carboline. Carcinogenesis. 1996;17:2259–2265. doi: 10.1093/carcin/17.10.2259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ohgaki H, Matsukura N, Morino K, Kawachi T, Sugimura T, Takayama S. Carcinogenicity in mice of mutagenic compounds from glutamic acid and soybean globulin pyrolysates. Carcinogenesis. 1984;5:815–819. doi: 10.1093/carcin/5.6.815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shirai T, Sano M, Tamano S, Takahashi S, Hirose M, Futakuchi M, Hasegawa R, Imaida K, Matsumoto Ki, Wakabayashi K, Sugimura T, Ito N. The prostate: A target for carcinogenicity of 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5- b ]pyridine (PhIP) derived from cooked foods. Cancer Res. 1997;57:195–198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nauwelaers G, Bessette EE, Gu D, Tang Y, Rageul J, Fessard V, Yuan JM, Yu MC, Langouët S, Turesky RJ. DNA adduct formation of 4-aminobiphenyl and heterocyclic aromatic amines in human hepatocytes. Chem Res Toxicol. 2011;24:913–925. doi: 10.1021/tx200091y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nagao M, Ochiai M, Okochi E, Ushijima T, Sugimura T. LacI transgenic animal study: relationships among DNA-adduct levels, mutant frequencies and cancer incidences. Mutat Res. 2001;477:119–124. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(01)00113-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Turesky Robert J, Yuan Jian-Min, Wang Renwei, Peterson Sabrina, Yu Mimi C. Tobacco smoking and urinary levels of 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole in men of Shanghai, China. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. 2007;16:1554–1560. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hatsukami DK, Kotlyar M, Hertsgaard LA, Zhang Y, Carmella SG, Jensen JA, Allen SS, Shields PG, Murphy SE, Stepanov I, Hecht SS. Reduced nicotine content cigarettes: effects on toxicant exposure, dependence and cessation. Addiction. 2010;105:343–355. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02780.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Turesky RJ, Constable A, Richoz J, Varga N, Markovic J, Martin MV, Guengerich FP. Activation of heterocyclic aromatic amines by rat and human liver microsomes and by purified rat and human cytochrome P450 1A2. Chem Res Toxicol. 1998;11:925–936. doi: 10.1021/tx980022n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tang Y, LeMaster DM, Nauwelaers G, Gu D, Langouet S, Turesky RJ. UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase-mediated metabolic activation of the tobacco carcinogen 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:14960–14972. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.320093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Boyland E, Manson D, Sims P. The preparation of o-aminophenylsulphates. J Chem Soc. 1953:3623–3628. doi:3610.1039/jr9530003623. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yuan ZX, Jha G, McGregor MA, King RS. Metabolites of the carcinogen 2-amino-alpha-carboline formed in male Sprague-Dawley rats in vivo and in rat hepatocyte and human HepG2 cell incubates. Chem Res Toxicol. 2007;20:497–503. doi: 10.1021/tx600303d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Turesky RJ, White KK, Wilkens LR, Le Marchand L. Caffeine cytochrome P450 1A2 metabolic phenotype does not predict the metabolism of heterocyclic aromatic amines in humans. Chem Res Toxicol. 2015;28:1603–1615. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5b00177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.MacDougall D, Amore FJ, Cox GV, Crosby DG, Estes FL, Freeman DH, Gibbs WE, Gordon GE, Keith LH, Lal J, Langner RR, McClelland NI, Phillips WF, Pojasek RB, Sievers RE. Guidelines for data acquistion and data quality evaluation in environmental chemistry. Anal Chem. 1980;52:2242–2249. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Turesky RJ, Taylor J, Schnackenberg L, Freeman JP, Holland RD. Quantitation of carcinogenic heterocyclic aromatic amines and detection of novel heterocyclic aromatic amines in cooked meats and grill scrapings by HPLC/ESI-MS. J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53:3248–3258. doi: 10.1021/jf048290g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Raza H, King RS, Squires RB, Guengerich FP, Miller DW, Freeman JP, Lang NP, Kadlubar FF. Metabolism of 2-amino-alpha-carboline. A food-borne heterocyclic amine mutagen and carcinogen by human and rodent liver microsomes and by human cytochrome P4501A2. Drug Metab Dispos. 1996;24:395–400. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Baldwin R, Bethem RA, Boyd RK, Budde WL, Cairns T, Gibbons RD, Henion JD, Kaiser MA, Lewis DL, Matuski JE, Sphon JA, Stephany RW, Trubey RK. 1996 ASMS Fall Workshop: Limits to Confirmation, Quantitation, and Detection. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 1997;8:1180–1190. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yi Lin, Dratter Joe, Wang Chao, Tunge Jon A, Desaire Heather. Identification of sulfation sites of metabolites and prediction of the compounds’ biological effects. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2006;386:666–674. doi: 10.1007/s00216-006-0495-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.el-Bayoumy K, Donahue JM, Hecht SS, Hoffmann D. Identification and quantitative determination of aniline and toluidines in human urine. Cancer Res. 1986;46:6064–6067. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Grimmer G, Dettbarn G, Seidel A, Jacob J. Detection of carcinogenic aromatic amines in the urine of non-smokers. Sci Total Environ. 2000;247:81–90. doi: 10.1016/s0048-9697(99)00471-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Riedel K, Scherer G, Engl J, Hagedorn HW, Tricker AR. Determination of three carcinogenic aromatic amines in urine of smokers and nonsmokers. J Anal Toxicol. 2006;30:187–195. doi: 10.1093/jat/30.3.187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Yu J, Wang S, Zhao G, Wang B, Ding L, Zhang X, Xie J, Xie F. Determination of urinary aromatic amines in smokers and nonsmokers using a MIPs-SPE coupled with LC-MS/MS method. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2014;958:130–135. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2014.03.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Riffelmann M, Muller G, Schmieding W, Popp W, Norpoth K. Biomonitoring of urinary aromatic amines and arylamine hemoglobin adducts in exposed workers and nonexposed control persons. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1995;68:36–43. doi: 10.1007/BF01831631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Fu Y, Zhao G, Wang S, Yu J, Xie F, Wang H, Xie J. Simultaneous determination of fifteen heterocyclic aromatic amines in the urine of smokers and nonsmokers using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 2014;1333:45–53. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.01.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Skog K, Solyakov A, Jagerstad MI. Effects of heating conditions and additives on the formation of heteroyclic amines with reference to amino-carbolines in a meat-juice model system. Food Chem Toxicol. 2000;68:299–308. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wyss M, Kaddurah-Daouk R. Creatine and creatinine metabolism. Physiol Rev. 2000;80:1107–1213. doi: 10.1152/physrev.2000.80.3.1107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Felton JS, Jagerstad M, Knize MG, Skog K, Wakabayashi K. Contents in foods, beverages and tobacco. In: Nagao M, Sugimura T, editors. Food Borne Carcinogens Heterocyclic Amines. John Wiley & Sons Ltd; Chichester, England: 2000. pp. 31–71. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Shorey Edmund C. The Isolation of Creatinine from Soils. 2. J Am Chem Soc. 1912;34:99–107. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lynch AM, Knize MG, Boobis AR, Gooderham N, Davies DS, Murray S. Intra- and interindividual variability in systemic exposure in humans to 2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo[4,5- f ]quinoxaline and 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5- b ]pyridine, carcinogens present in food. Cancer Res. 1992;52:6216–6223. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.King RS, Teitel CH, Kadlubar FF. In vitro bioactivation of N-hydroxy-2-amino-alpha-carboline. Carcinogenesis. 2000;21:1347–1354. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Turesky RJ, Bendaly J, Yasa I, Doll MA, Hein DW. The impact of NAT2 acetylator genotype on mutagenesis and DNA adducts from 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole. Chem Res Toxicol. 2009;22:726–733. doi: 10.1021/tx800473w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Behrman EJ. Comment on “Revised mechanism of Boyland-Sims oxidation”. J Phys Chem A. 2011;115:7863–7864. doi: 10.1021/jp2035407. author reply 7865–7868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kriek E. Fifty years of research on N-acetyl-2-aminofluorene, one of the most versatile compounds in experimental cancer research. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1992;118:481–489. doi: 10.1007/BF01225261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Nauwelaers G, Bellamri M, Fessard V, Turesky RJ, Langouët S. DNA adducts of the tobacco carcinogens 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole and 4-aminobiphenyl are formed at environmental exposure levels and persist in human hepatocytes. Chem Res Toxicol. 2013;26:1367–1377. doi: 10.1021/tx4002226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental

RESOURCES