Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology logoLink to Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
. 2015 Nov-Dec;29(8):435–439. doi: 10.1155/2015/473726

Mild clinical behaviour of Crohn disease in elderly patients in a Latin American country: A case-control study

Jesús K Yamamoto-Furusho 1,2,, Andrea Sarmiento-Aguilar 1
PMCID: PMC4699598  PMID: 25996614

The clinical characteristics of Crohn disease vary according to several factors including age and age-related changes in dietary habits, gastrointestinal motility and pH, and changes in the gut microbiota, among others. Therefore, the disease process in younger versus older individuals may not be the same, which, in turn, would suggest different or at least modified treatment strategies. Accordingly, this retrospective case-control study explored these differences in an elderly Mexican population.

Keywords: Clinical behaviour, Crohn disease, Elderly, Geriatric

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Crohn disease is characterized by fluctuating clinical behaviour, which is influenced by various factors. There are no data from Latin America that evaluate the clinical behaviour of Crohn disease in elderly patients.

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the clinical course of elderly onset Crohn disease compared with younger onset in the Mexican population.

METHODS:

The present analysis was a case-control study that included 132 patients with a histopathological diagnosis of Crohn disease between 1983 and 2013 in an inflammatory bowel disease clinic of a tertiary care centre. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 17 (IBM Corporation, USA) and descriptive statistics, χ2 and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and Student’s t test for numerical variables. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify associated risk factors and OR was calculated.

RESULTS:

A total of 132 patients (73 men and 59 women) were divided into two groups according to age at diagnosis: 27 cases (>60 years of age) and 105 controls (≤60 years of age). Factors influencing the clinical course of Crohn disease in the elderly were: female sex (OR 2.55 [95% CI 1.06 to 6.10]; P=0.02); colonic location (OR 0.22 [95% CI 0.03 to 0.89]; P=0.02); mild clinical behaviour of disease (OR 10.08 [95% CI 3.74 to 27.17]; P=0.0001); response to medical treatment (OR 2.85 [95% CI 1.08 to 7.48]; P=0.02); frequent use of sulfasalazine (OR 4.46 [95% CI 1.22 to 16.28]; P=0.03); less use of azathioprine (OR 0.38 [95% CI 0.13 to 1.03]; P=0.04); and long-term remission (OR 4.96 [95% CI 1.70 to 14.48]; P=0.002).

CONCLUSION:

Elderly patients with Crohn disease had a mild clinical course characterized by the lack of escalation to immunosuppressive and anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy, as well as long-term remission.


Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) includes Crohn disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Little is known regarding its multifactorial and etiopathogenic mechanisms, of which three main factors – genetics, immunity and the environment – are involved (1). The course of CD is characterized by fluctuating clinical behaviour, which is influenced by various factors including hospitalization rates, treatment response, postsurgical recurrence, relapses, exacerbations and older age at diagnosis.

In 2014, the world’s population was estimated to be 7.2 billion and, from this number, 8% appeared to be older adults (2); however, by 2050, the number of older persons worldwide is projected to more than double to two billion (3). Population aging is occurring in every country, although each country is at a different stage of this transition (4). For example, by 2050, Mexico’s aged are projected to represent 27.7% of the population (5), while the same demographic in the United States is expected to represent 20.3% (6). This fast-growing elderly population represents part of an age group in which important physiological changes occur, including immune deficiency (peculiar to old age), increased frequency of comorbidities and polypharmacy. These characteristics place this age group at higher risk, which undoubtedly affects the clinical course of CD. Despite the fact that fewer than one-third of epidemiological studies have documented a bimodal distribution of IBD incidence with a second peak between 60 and 70 years of age (7), elderly patients with CD should not be treated with aggressive therapy because it has been proposed that the disease process may not represent the same disease process present in younger patients (8). Furthermore, 10% to 15% of patients with IBD will be diagnosed at >60 years of age (913) (65% during the sixth decade of life, 25% during the seventh decade and 10% during the eighth decade [12,13]). Women are more likely than men to be diagnosed with IBD after 60 years of age (1418), and there is a higher incidence of UC than CD (14). These phenotypic differences among age groups reflect variations in mucosal immune response, composition of the microbiome, genetics and/or environmental risk factors that are not fully understood (18). Interestingly, very-early onset (zero to six years of age) and elderly onset CD are characterized by the predominance of pure colonic disease (L2, according to the Montreal classification) (1826).

Several studies have proposed that elderly patients diagnosed with CD have a less aggressive clinical course compared with those diagnosed at a younger age. This suggests that gastrointestinal tract changes occur with aging and produce dietary shifts among older individuals, alterations in gastrointestinal motility and gastric pH due to mucosal atrophy, increased intestinal permeability and changes in the gut microbiota associated with aging that may influence host-inflammatory responses (2730). For example, the risk for surgery decreases with older age at diagnosis, disease distribution and history of cigarette smoking (31). In CD, the prevalence of diarrhea, abdominal pain, extraintestinal manifestations, weight loss and fever decreases in older or elderly patients (18,32). A large population-based cohort study involving a French population that included 841 IBD patients concluded that the clinical course is mild in elderly onset IBD patients due to disease behaviour, and was reported to remain stable in 91% of patients with elderly onset CD after a median follow-up period of six years (33). Other studies have concluded that the clinical manifestations of the first flare of CD are similar in the >60 years of age and younger age groups (18), characterized by the predominance of inflammatory behaviour (18,21,34,35). To date, no data from genetic studies have been published regarding elderly onset IBD variants to further define the contribution of specific gene associations with elderly onset IBD; however, the role of genetic factors is believed to be greater in pediatric-onset than in late-onset IBD (18). It has also been found that older patients with IBD may have an increased susceptibility to gastrointestinal infection because the response to stress in the setting of acute inflammation may be altered or blunted (28,30,36).

There are some key features considered for elderly onset CD: inflammatory disease behaviour, colonic or ileocolonic disease location, uncommon family history of IBD, and reduced progression to penetrating or stricturing disease phenotypes (37). Prompted by the lack of data from Latin America evaluating the clinical behaviour of CD in the elderly, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical course of elderly compared with younger-onset CD in the Mexican population.

METHODS

The present analysis was a retrospective case-control study that included 132 patients with histopathological diagnosis of CD between 1983 and 2013 in the IBD clinic of a tertiary care centre (National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition “Salvador Zubirán”, Mexico). Clinical records were reviewed and a database including the following variables was constructed: sex, age, place of birth, place of residence, weight, height and body mass index; family history of IBD and family or personal history of other immune-mediated diseases; pack-years of smoking (number of cigarettes smoked daily multiplied by the years of smoking divided by 20); history of appendectomy or tonsillectomy; intake of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; thrombosis and its location (upper limbs, lower limbs, pulmonary thromboembolism, acute coronary syndrome or vascular brain disease); age at diagnosis; disease phenotype (inflammatory, stricturing or fistulizing); location (terminal ileum, ileocolonic, colonic, upper digestive tract); clinical course (initially active followed by long-term remission, intermittent activity (less or one relapse a year) or continuous activity (≥2 relapses per year); extraintestinal manifestations such as arthritis, arthralgia, ankylosing spondylitis, sacroiliitis, sclerosing cholangitis, pyoderma gangrenosum, erythema nodosum or uveitis; number of hospitalizations; treatment response and reasons for lack of response response and surgical treatment. Other variables included were: post-surgical recurrence; current CD treatment; and clinical activity or remission of the disease at the time of evaluation. The present research was approved by the local ethics committee.

Statistical analysis

Demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics are presented as mean ±SD, median and range. The Fisher’s exact probability test was used to compare categorical variables when the number of expected subjects was <5 and by the χ2 test otherwise. The unpaired t test was used to compare differences in the means of continuous variables. Nonparametric variables in independent samples were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. ORs and 95% CIs were calculated using univariate and multivariate analyses adjusted for age, sex, extent of disease, Mayo Score, C-reactive protein level and current medical treatment. P≤0.05 was considered to be statistically significant and Bonferroni correction for P value was applied for multiple comparison calculated as α/n. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 17.0 (IBM Corporation, USA).

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients were evaluated 73 (55.3%) men and 59 (44.7%) women divided in two groups: 27 (20.5%) who were diagnosed at >60 years of age (cases) and 105 (79.5%) who were diagnosed at ≤60 years of age (controls). Detailed demographic and clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1 and 2, respectively.

TABLE 1.

Demographic variables of patients with Crohn disease

Variable Cases (n=27) Controls (n=105)
Sex
  Male 10 (37) 63 (59.05)
  Female 17 (63) 42 (40)
Family history of inflammatory bowel disease 0 (0) 1 (0.95)
Smoker 10 (37.03) 47 (44.76)
Autoimmune concomitant disease 3 (11.11) 13 (12.38)
Appendectomy 7 (25.92) 24 (22.85)
Tonsillectomy 3 (11.11) 18 (17.14)

Data presented as n (%)

TABLE 2.

Clinical characteristics of Crohn disease (CD) patients

Variable Cases (n=27) Controls (n=105)
CD pattern
  Inflammatory 7 (25.92) 44 (41.9)
  Fistulizing 10 (37.03) 30 (28.57)
  Stricturing 10 (37.03) 37 (35.23)
CD location
  Terminal ileum 11 (40.74) 26 (24.76)
  Ileocolonic 12 (44.44) 47 (44.76)
  Colonic 2 (7.4) 27 (25.71)
  Upper digestive tract 2 (7.4) 7 (6.6)
Clinical course
  Initially active followed by long-term remission 19 (70.37) 21 (20)
  Intermittent activity 5 (18.51) 51 (48.57)
  Continuous activity 2 (7.4) 27 (25.71)
Extraintestinal manifestations
  Arthritis 1 (3.7) 6 (5.71)
  Arthralgias 3 (11.11) 23 (21.9)
  Ankylosing spondylitis 4 (14.81) 8 (7.61)
  Sclerosing cholangitis 0 (0) 1 (0.95)
  Pyoderma gangrenosum 0 (0) 3 (2.85)
  Erythema nodosum 0 (0) 2 (1.9)
  Uveitis 1 (3.7) 0 (0)
Lack of response to medical treatment 10 (37.03) 70 (66.6)
Surgical treatment 18 (66.6) 78 (74.28)
Postsurgical recurrence 1 (3.7) 10 (9.52)
Current treatment
  Sulfasalazine 4 (14.81) 6 (5.71)
  Mesalazine 4 (14.81) 23 (21.9)
  Azathioprine 6 (22.22) 31 (29.52)
  Prednisone 4 (14.81) 25 (23.8)
  Methotrexate 0 (0) 1 (0.95)
  Biologic therapy 0 (0) 2 (1.9)

Data presented as n (%)

CD patients >60 years of age

From the elderly patients, the case group consisted of 27 individuals (10 men and 17 women). The presence of steroid dependency was 3.8% and steroid resistance 0.8%; thiopurine-resistance 0.8% and intolerance to thiopurines 2.3%; and 72.7% undewent intestinal surgical resection. The reasons for surgery were bowel fibrostenotic stricturing (33.7%), bowel perforation (12.7%), intra-abdominal abscess (10.3%), penetrating disease (9%), dysplasia (5%), cancer (1.5%) and toxic megacolon (0.5%).

CD patients ≤60 years of age

The control group included 105 patients (63 men and 42 women). The presence of steroid dependency was 18.5% and steroid-resistance 7%; thiopurine resistance 15% and intolerance to thiopurines 2.5%. All patients underwent intestinal surgical resection for the following reasons: bowel fibrostenotic stricturing (35.2%), penetrating disease (28.57%), intra-abdominal abscess (20.5%), bowel perforation (10.5%), dysplasia (2.3%), cancer (1.5%) and toxic megacolon (1.43%).

Factors influencing the clinical course of CD in elderly patients

The univariate analysis found that the following factors influenced the clinical course of CD in elderly patients: female sex (OR 2.55 [CI 95% 1.06 to 6.10]; P=0.02); a less frequent colonic location (OR=0.22 CI 95% CI 0.03 to 0.89]; P=0.02); mild clinical behaviour of disease (OR 10.08 [95% CI 3.74 to 27.17]; P=0.0001) and a better response to the medical treatment (OR 2.85 [95% CI 95% 1.08 to 7.48]; P=0.02), frequent use of sulfasalazine (OR 4.46 95% CI 1.22 to 16.28]; P=0.03); low use of azathioprine (OR 0.38 [95% CI 95% 0.13 to 1.03]; P=0.04) and higher clinical remission rate (OR 4.96 [95% CI 1.70 to 14.48]; P=0.002) (Table 3).

TABLE 3.

Factors influencing the course of Crohn disease in the elderly population Variable

Variable Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
Female sex P=0.02 P=0.54
OR=2.55
Colonic location P=0.02 P=0.03
OR=0.22 OR=0.13
Mild clinical course of disease P=0.0001 P=0.0001
OR=10.08 OR=0.15
Response to medical treatment P=0.02 P=0.31
OR=2.85
Use of sulfasalazine P=0.03 P=0.54
OR=4.46
Use of azathioprine P=0.04 P=0.02
OR=0.38 OR=0.25
Clinical remission P=0.002 P=0.22
OR=4.96

Significant statistical trends were found in the following factors: elderly patients present pulmonary thromboembolism more frequently (OR 6.53 [95% CI 1.01 to 40.67]; P=0.05), as well as a predominant terminal-ileum location (OR 2.03 [95% CI 0.83 to 4.94]; P=0.09) and a more common inflammatory pattern (OR 0.48 [95% CI 0.18 to 1.24]; P=0.09).

In the multivariate analysis, the following factors influenced the clincal course of CD in elderly patients: a less frequent colonic location (P=0.021, OR=0.130), a mild clinical course of disease (P=0.0001, OR=0.151), less use of azathioprine (P=0.027, OR=0.255) and inflammatory pattern (P=0.01, OR=0.193).

DISCUSSION

The present study clearly showed a milder clinical course of CD in elderly patients, and was the first performed in the Latin American population. We found that women were predominantly affected, similar to a previous study (the EPIMAD registry [19]) and one study from the United States Military Health Care Population (38). Smoking was associated with increased risk for CD and worse outcomes over the disease course (18,39,40) and, interestingly, our study found a higher proportion of smoking patients in the young group than in the elderly group, which could have also influenced the different outcomes. In the present study, CD patients had a less frequent colonic location and had a more common inflammatory pattern, compared with the French registry, which found that pure colonic disease and inflammatory behaviour were the most frequent phenotypes (14). A study from Hungary (41) found pure colonic disease and a more common stenosing pattern. A retrospective study concluded that older and younger patients underwent surgery in similar percentages (83% versus 77%) (42), a finding similar to that reported in our population (66.6% versus 74.28%).

The elderly patients in the present study exhibited mild clinical disease behaviour, characterized by initially active disease followed by long-term clinical remission, better response to medical treatment and more use of sulfasalazine and less use of azathioprine. These findings were also reported in other studies. For example, the Hungarian study (41) found that their elderly population required less systemic steroids compared with their younger groups. A French study (43) concluded that immunosuppressants were more frequently required in the childhood-onset group than in the elderly onset patients. In this study, it was also found that older adults were less likely to require immunosuppressants or readmission for CD flares compared with younger patients (44). It has even been concluded that corticosteroid response is similar in older and younger patients hospitalized for IBD, but older corticosteroid-responsive patients are less likely to be treated with an anti-tumour necrosis factor agent than younger patients (45). Furthermore, care providers should be aware of polypharmacy and its potential for drug interactions because it has been shown that the prevalence of medication use is higher among patients with IBD than matched members of the general population, particularly the use of analgesic and psychiatric drugs (46). Regarding the extraintestinal manifestations of IBD, thromboembolic events represent a major cause of morbidity and mortality (47,48), and it is known that IBD is an independent risk factor for thromboembolic phenomena (49). One study also found a more frequent prevalence of venous thromboembolism (TE) in elderly patients with IBD (6.15%) compared with the control group (1.62%) (50). This correlates with the fact that our elderly patients tended to present with pulmonary TE more frequently. Other studies have concluded that the most frequent thromboembolic complications are deep vein thromboses and pulmonary emboli, and that this event can occur as a postsurgical complication or spontaneous event (48).

This less agressive clinical behaviour is gradually occupying an important place among the diverse factors that influence the decision-making process regarding the therapeutic approach to an elderly patient diagnosed with CD. Nevertheless, it should not be considered without taking into account all other aspects that play a role in each specific case. For example, one current approach to drug therapy in the elderly is to ‘start low; go slow’ and then reassess their candidacy for more aggressive therapy (biologics, apheresis, surgery), and not treat or exclude patients on the basis of age alone (51). In conclusion, elderly patients with CD had a mild disease course characterized by long-term remission, less use of aggressive therapy, such as thiopurines and anti-tumour necrosis factor agents, and better response to medical treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients had a less aggressive clinical course compared with younger patients, and commonly achieved remission without the need of escalating the treatment beyond aminosalycilates.

There are no data from Latin America that evaluate the clinical behaviour of CD in elderly patients. The present study showed that elderly patients with CD had a mild clinical course characterized by the lack of escalation to immunosuppressive and anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy, as well as long-term remission.

Footnotes

DISCLOSURES: The authors have no financial disclosures or conflicts of interest to declare.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Shanahan F. The microbiota and inflammatory bowel disease: Friend, bystander and sometime villain. Nutr Rev. 2012;70:S31–S37. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2012.00502.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.2014 World Population Data Sheet. Population Reference Bureau. < www.prb.org/pdf14/2014-world-population-data-sheet_eng.pdf> (Accesed October 11, 2014)
  • 3.United Nations Population ageing and sustainable development. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. < www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/popfacts/PopFacts_2014-4.pdf> (Accesed October 11, 2014)
  • 4.World Health Organization Good Health adds life to years. Global Brief for World Health Day. 2012 < http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2012/WHO_DCO_WHD_2012.2_eng.pdf?ua=1> (Accesed October 11, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Proyecciones de la población de México 2005–2050. Consejo Nacional de Población. < www.conapo.gob.mx/es/CONAPO/Documento_Metodologico_Proyecciones_2010_2050> (Accesed October 13, 2014)
  • 6.Wiener JM, Tilly J. Population ageing in the United States of America, International Epidemiological Association 2002. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31:776–781. doi: 10.1093/ije/31.4.776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Molodecky NA, Soon IS, Rabi DM, et al. Increasing incidence and prevalence of the inflammatory bowel disease with time, based on systematic review. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:46–54. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Katz S, Pardi DS. Inflammatory bowel disease of the elderly: Frequently asked questions (FAQs) Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;11:1889–97. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kelsen J, Baldassano RN. Inflammatory bowel disease: The difference between children and adults. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008;14:S9–S11. doi: 10.1002/ibd.20560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Travis S. Is IBD different in the elderly? Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008;14:S12–S13. doi: 10.1002/ibd.20605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bernstein CN, Wajda A, Svenson LW, et al. The epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease in Canada: A population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1559–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00603.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Loftus EV, Jr, Silverstein MD, Sandborn WJ, et al. Crohn’s disease in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1940–1993: Incidence, prevalence, and survival. Gastroenterology. 1998;114:1161–8. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(98)70421-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Loftus EV, Jr, Silverstein MD, Sandborn WJ, et al. Ulcerative colitis in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1940–1993: Incidence, prevalence, and survival. Gut. 2000;46:336–43. doi: 10.1136/gut.46.3.336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Charpentier C, Salleron J, Savoye G, et al. Natural history of elderly-onset inflammatory bowel disease: A population-based cohort study. Gut. 2013;63:423–4. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mamula P, Telega GW, Markowitz JE, et al. Inflammatory bowel disease in children 5 years of age and younger. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:2005–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05915.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shivananda S, Lennard-Jones J, Logan R, et al. Incidence of inflammatory bowel disease across Europe: Is there a difference between north and south? Results of the European Collaborative Study on Inflammatory Bowel Disease (EC-IBD) Gut. 1996;39:690–7. doi: 10.1136/gut.39.5.690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gupta N, Bostrom AG, Krischner BS, et al. Gender differences in presentation and course of disease in pediatric patients with Crohn disease. Pediatrics. 2007;120:1418–25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ruel J, Ruane D, Mehandru S, Gower-Rosseau C, Colombel JF. IBD across the age spectrum – is it the same disease? Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;11:88–98. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gower-Rousseau C, Vasseur F, Fumery M, et al. Epidemiology of inflammatory bowel diseases: New insights from a French population-based registry (EPIMAD) Dig Liver Dis. 2013;45:89–94. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2012.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Guariso G, Gasparetto M, Visonà Dalla Pozza L, et al. Inflammatory bowel disease developing in paediatric and adult age. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010;51:698–707. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181da1db8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Vernier-Massouille G, Balde M, Salleron J, et al. Natural history of pediatric Crohn’s disease: A population-based cohort study. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:1106–13. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.06.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Heyman MB, Kirschner BS, Gold BD, et al. Children with early-onset inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): Analysis of a pediatric IBD consortium registry. J Pediatr. 2005;146:35–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.08.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Paul T, Birnbaum A, Pal DK, et al. Distinct phenotype of early childhood inflammatory bowel disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;40:583–6. doi: 10.1097/00004836-200608000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Langholz E, Munkholm P, Krasilnikoff PA, Binder V. Inflammatory bowel diseases with onset in childhood. Clinical features, morbidity, and mortality in a regional cohort. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997;32:139–47. doi: 10.3109/00365529709000184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Freeman HJ. Comparison of longstanding pediatric-onset and adult-onset Crohn’s disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2004;39:183–6. doi: 10.1097/00005176-200408000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Müller KE, Lakatos PL, Arató A, et al. Incidence, Paris classification and follow-up in a nationwide, incident cohort of pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013;57:576–82. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31829f7d8c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Britton E, McLaughlin JT. Ageing and the gut. Proc Nutr Soc. 2013;72:173–7. doi: 10.1017/S0029665112002807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Schiffrin EJ, Morley JE, Donnet-Hughes A, Guigoz Y. The inflammatory status of the elderly: The intestinal contribution. Mutat Res. 2010;690:50–6. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2009.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Biagi E, Candela M, Fairweather-Tait S, Franceschi C, Brigidi P. Aging of the human metaorganism: The microbial counterpart. Age. 2012;34:247–67. doi: 10.1007/s11357-011-9217-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ha CY, Katz S. Clinical implications of ageing for the management of IBD. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11:128–38. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tremaine WJ, Timmons LJ, Loftus EV, Jr, et al. Age at onset of inflammatory bowel disease and the risk of surgery for non-neoplastic bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;25:1435–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03341.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Malaty HM, Fan X, Opekun AR, Thibodeaux C, Ferry GD. Rising incidence of inflammatory bowel disease among children: A 12-year study. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010;50:27–31. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181b99baa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Charpentier C, Salleron J, Savoye G, et al. Natural history of elderly-onset inflammatory bowel disease: A population-based cohort study. Gut. 2013;63:423–32. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kugathasan S, Judd RH, Hoffmann RG, et al. Epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of children with newly diagnosed inflammatory bowel disease in Wisconsin: A statewide population-based study. J Pediatr. 2003;143:525–31. doi: 10.1067/s0022-3476(03)00444-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sauer CG, Kugathasan S. Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: Highlighting pediatric differences in IBD. Med Clin North Am. 2010;94:35–52. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2009.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cambier J. Immunosenescence: A problem of lymphopoiesis, homeostasis, microenvironment, and signaling. Immunol Rev. 2005;205:5–6. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2005.00276.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ha C, Katz S. Elderly-onset IBD: A milder disease? Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;10:264–65. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Betteridge JD, Armbruster SP, Maydonovitch C, Verappan GR. Inflammatory bowel disease prevalence by age, gender, race, and geographic location in the U.S. military health care population. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013;19:1421–7. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0b013e318281334d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Clegg A, Young J, lliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 2013;381:752–62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62167-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Karczewski J, Poniedzialek B, Rzymski P, Rychlewska-Hanczewska A, Adamski Z, Wiktorowicz K. The effect of cigarette smoking on the clinical course of inflammatory bowel disease. Prz Gastroenterol. 2014;9:153–9. doi: 10.5114/pg.2014.43577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lakatos PL, David G, Pandur T, et al. IBD in the elderly population: Results from a population-based study in Western Hungary, 1977–2008. J Crohns Colitis. 2011;5:5–13. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2010.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wagtmans MJ, Verspaget HW, Lamers CB, Van Hogezand RA. Crohn’s disease in the elderly: A comparison with young adults. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1998;27:129–33. doi: 10.1097/00004836-199809000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Pigneur B, Seksik P, Viola S, et al. Natural history of Crohn’s disease: Comparison between childhood- and adult-onset disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010;16:953–61. doi: 10.1002/ibd.21152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Heresbach D, Alexandre JL, Bretagne JF, et al. Crohn’s disease in the over-60 age group: A population based study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;16:657–64. doi: 10.1097/01.meg.0000108337.41221.08. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Weber NK, Bruining DH, Loftus EV, Jr, et al. Comparative outcomes of younger and older hospitalized patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with corticosteroids. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013;19:2644–51. doi: 10.1097/01.MIB.0000436961.08029.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Buckley JP, Kappelman MD, Allen JK, Van Meter SA, Cook SF. The burden of comedication among patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013;19:2725–36. doi: 10.1097/01.MIB.0000435442.07237.a4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Dolapcioglu C, Soylu A, Kendir T, et al. Coagulation parameters in inflammatory bowel disease. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014;7:1442–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Talbot RW, Heppell J, Dozois RR, Beart RW., Jr Vascular complications of inflammatory bowel disease. Mayo Clin Proc. 1986;61:140–5. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)65200-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Cosnes J, Beaugerie L, Carbonnel F, Gendre JP. Smoking cessation and the course of Crohn’s disease: An intervention study. Gastroenterology. 2001;120:1093–9. doi: 10.1053/gast.2001.23231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Miehsler W, Reinisch W, Valic E, et al. Is inflammatory bowel disease an independent and disease specific risk factor for thromboembolism? Gut. 2004;53:542–8. doi: 10.1136/gut.2003.025411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Suárez FC, Vera Mendoza MI, Amo San Román L, et al. Risk of thromboembolic phenomena in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;35:634–9. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2012.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES