Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Pharmacology logoLink to Frontiers in Pharmacology
. 2016 Jan 6;6:297. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2015.00297

Dopamine D3 Receptors Inhibit Hippocampal Gamma Oscillations by Disturbing CA3 Pyramidal Cell Firing Synchrony

Clément E Lemercier 1, Steffen B Schulz 1,†, Karin E Heidmann 1, Richard Kovács 1, Zoltan Gerevich 1,*
PMCID: PMC4702013  PMID: 26779018

Abstract

Cortical gamma oscillations are associated with cognitive processes and are altered in several neuropsychiatric conditions such as schizophrenia and Alzheimer’s disease. Since dopamine D3 receptors are possible targets in treatment of these conditions, it is of great importance to understand their role in modulation of gamma oscillations. The effect of D3 receptors on gamma oscillations and the underlying cellular mechanisms were investigated by extracellular local field potential and simultaneous intracellular sharp micro-electrode recordings in the CA3 region of the hippocampus in vitro. D3 receptors decreased the power and broadened the bandwidth of gamma oscillations induced by acetylcholine or kainate. Blockade of the D3 receptors resulted in faster synchronization of the oscillations, suggesting that endogenous dopamine in the hippocampus slows down the dynamics of gamma oscillations by activation of D3 receptors. Investigating the underlying cellular mechanisms for these effects showed that D3 receptor activation decreased the rate of action potentials (APs) during gamma oscillations and reduced the precision of the AP phase coupling to the gamma cycle in CA3 pyramidal cells. The results may offer an explanation how selective activation of D3 receptors may impair cognition and how, in converse, D3 antagonists may exert pro-cognitive and antipsychotic effects.

Keywords: gamma rhythm, dopamine D3 receptors, hippocampus CA3 region, cognition, schizophrenia, antipsychotics

Introduction

Cognitive impairment is common in individuals with neuropsychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia, mood disorders, Alzheimer’s disease, autism spectrum disorder, and Parkinson’s disease (Millan et al., 2012). Many efforts have been made to develop drugs to maintain or enhance cognitive processes but the available treatments still have limited pro-cognitive effects. Despite some progress in treating cognitive deficits in schizophrenia with second-generation antipsychotics, management of negative and cognitive symptoms remains one of the most pressing and unresolved problems of neuropsychopharmacology (Miyamoto et al., 2012).

In recent years, there has been increasing recognition of the role of D3 receptors in cognition (Nakajima et al., 2013). Behavioral studies in a variety of animals have shown that activation of D3 receptors impairs attention, working memory, object recognition, associative learning, episodic memory, and spatial learning (Ukai et al., 1997; Smith et al., 1999; Watson et al., 2012), whereas blockade or knockout of this receptor seems to exert pro-cognitive effects (Glickstein et al., 2005; Laszy et al., 2005; Loiseau and Millan, 2009; Xing et al., 2010). Accordingly, in humans, activation of these receptors has been shown to impair cognitive performance, whereas their blockade seems to have pro-cognitive effects (Cools et al., 2006; Hamidovic et al., 2008; Gross et al., 2013). Despite the increasing evidence for D3 receptor involvement on cognitive processes, the underlying mechanism is still not understood (Nakajima et al., 2013).

Gamma band (30–90 Hz) oscillations have been implicated in a range of aforementioned cognitive processes (Axmacher et al., 2010; Powell et al., 2014) and are known to be generated by the synchronous firing of perisomatic parvalbumin containing fast-spiking basket cells (Gulyás et al., 2010). An increasing number of studies have demonstrated that gamma oscillations are altered and instable in schizophrenic patients and have led to the hypothesis that disturbances in gamma band network activity may be involved in the pathophysiology of the disease (Uhlhaas and Singer, 2010). Associations between gamma disturbances and positive, negative and cognitive symptoms have been observed (Light et al., 2006; Lee et al., 2010; Mulert et al., 2011) making gamma rhythm abnormalities an emerging biomarker in schizophrenia with a potential for use in drug development. In our previous study on the effects of first and second generation antipsychotics on hippocampal gamma oscillations (Schulz et al., 2012a) we found that among 19 investigated receptors, the 5-HT3 and D3 receptors seemed to be most strongly implicated in the effect of antipsychotics on hippocampal gamma oscillations. Indeed, elevated D3 receptor expression have been found in the central nervous system of schizophrenic patients (Gurevich et al., 1997). Moreover, D3 receptor polymorphisms have been reported to be associated with schizophrenia (Jönsson et al., 2003; Talkowski et al., 2006) and poorer working memory and executive functioning tasks (Szekeres et al., 2004).

In present study, we investigated the effect of D3 receptors on hippocampal gamma oscillations and its underlying cellular mechanisms. Our findings show that D3 receptor activation decreases the power, coherence and dynamics of gamma oscillations and that this effect is accompanied by a reduction of the firing rate in CA3 pyramidal cells and the synchrony of their spiking within the gamma cycle. In light of the relationship between hippocampal gamma rhythms and higher cognitive functions, our data offer an explanation how D3 receptor activation may exert anti-cognitive action and how its blockade may have pro-cognitive and antipsychotic effects.

Materials and Methods

Slice Preparation

Hippocampal slices were prepared from Wistar rats of both sexes at an age of 6–9 weeks (180–230 g). Animal procedures were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the European Communities Council and the institutional guidelines approved by the Berlin Animal Ethics Committee (Landesamt für Gesundheit und Soziales Berlin, T0330/12). All efforts were made to minimize animal suffering and to reduce the number of animals used. Animals were anesthetized with isoflurane and then decapitated. Their brains were removed and immerged in ice-cold artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF; in mM: NaCl, 129; KCl, 3; NaHCO3, 21; NaH2PO4, 1.25; MgSO4, 1.8; CaCl2, 1.6; glucose, 10) aerated with carbogen gas (95% O2/5% CO2). The brain was cut into 400 μm thick horizontal slices containing the hippocampal formation with a vibratome (DSK microslicer DTK-1000, Dosaka, Japan). Slices were immediately transferred to an interface-type recording chamber perfused with warm and carbogenated ACSF (36°C, flow rate 1.7 ml/min). Slices were left for recovery for at least 1 h before starting the experiments.

Extracellular Recordings

Local field potentials were recorded from stratum pyramidale of area CA3b with glass pipettes filled with ACSF (resistance < 3 MΩ) as earlier described (Klaft et al., 2012; Çalişkan et al., 2015). Recordings were amplified by a custom-made amplifier, low-pass filtered at 1 kHz and sampled at 5 kHz by a CED 1401 interface (Cambridge Electronic Design, Cambridge, UK). Gamma oscillations were induced by bath application of either 10 mM acetylcholine (ACh) and 2 mM physostigmine (Physo) or 100 nM kainic acid (KA) and stabilized after 90 and 50 min, respectively. Drugs were applied 100 and 60 min after the application of ACh/Physo and KA, respectively, for a period of 60 min. Antagonists, if appropriate, were applied 40 min prior to the agonist or the wash out of ACh/Physo. Note that for the better oxygen supply in the tissue, gamma oscillations were evoked in an interface-type chamber showing slower equilibration of slices with drugs than in submerged chambers (Hájos et al., 2009).

Intracellular Recordings

Intracellular recordings were made after the induction of ACh-induced gamma oscillations from CA3b pyramidal cells in the slice with sharp microelectrodes filled with 2 M K+-acetate (resistance 70.3 ± 5.4 MΩ) as described earlier (Schulz et al., 2012b). Intracellular signals were amplified by a SEC-05 LX amplifier (npi electronics, Tamm, Germany), low-pass filtered at 2 kHz and sampled at 10 kHz using the CED 1401 interface. Recordings were done in bridge mode. Cells were impaled during the induction of gamma oscillations. The measurements were started after the stabilization of gamma oscillations but at least 20 min after penetration. Only cells were accepted which showed stable overshooting APs over the full period of the experiment.

Materials

KA, Physo, PD-128907, PG-01037, and L-741,626 were purchased from Tocris Bioscience (Bristol, UK). ACh was purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (Taufkirchen, Germany).

Data Analysis and Statistics

For the analysis of oscillations, power spectra were calculated every 2 min with a 2-min window throughout the recording and peak power, peak frequency and half bandwidth (at 50% of peak power) were determined off-line by using a custom-made script for the Spike2 software (Cambridge Electronic Design, Cambridge, UK). Since absolute power values vary substantially among slices, they were normalized in every slice to a 10-min period before the drug application, the ACh/Physo washout or the corresponding time in control experiments. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical comparisons between the drug-induced effects and the time-matched control experiments were made using Student’s t-test. Significance level was set at p < 0.05.

Phase histograms of APs from intracellular recordings in relationship to the extracellular gamma cycle and the corresponding LFP waveform averages were calculated by the Spike2 software over time windows covering 1000 APs each. 0° represents the trough of the LFP gamma cycles. Occurrence of fast components at the negative peak of gamma oscillations (most probably spikes in pyramidal cells adjacent to the electrode tip) made a low-pass filtering (100 Hz) of the data necessary (Fisahn et al., 1998). Although the FIR filter preserves the shape and phase of the signal better than the infinite impulse response (IIR) filter, we observed a minimal ∼10° shift in phase which, however, did not bias the calculated changes in phase accuracy or preferred phase induced by drugs. Analysis of the phasic AP timing resulted in a mean vector for each cell. Its mean phase Φ and vector lengths r were used to calculate the mean vectors and the circular standard deviations for the cell populations of different drug conditions (Schulz et al., 2012b). Time-frequency-analysis of LFPs was carried out offline using the Spike2 software.

Results

Dopamine Inhibits Cholinergically Induced Gamma Oscillations in the Hippocampus

Perfusion of the hippocampal slices with acetylcholine (ACh, 10 μM) and Physo (2 μM) induced gamma oscillations in the CA3 pyramidal layer with a peak power of 429.22 ± 253.26 μV2, a peak frequency of 37.6 ± 0.71 Hz and a half bandwidth of 3.92 ± 0.82 Hz. A narrow half bandwidth in the power spectrum of the oscillation indicates a high temporal coherence and regular oscillations, whereas a wide gamma band means low coherence and less regular oscillations.

Application of dopamine (DA; 100 μM) decreased the power to 46.2 ± 10.8% (n = 6; p < 0.001, compared to control power change to 106.1 ± 8.9%, n = 12; Figure 1), whereas the peak frequency did not change significantly (108.0 ± 3.5%, p = 0.057 compared to control frequency change to 102.2 ± 1.0%; Figure 1). We also investigated the effect of DA on the width of the gamma band (half bandwidth) and found that DA did not affect significantly the bandwidth of the oscillation (138.7 ± 14.1%, p = 0.123 compared to control half bandwidth change to 117.4 ± 6.1%; Figure 1).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Open in a new tab

Dopamine (DA) inhibits cholinergically induced hippocampal gamma oscillations. (Aa) Local field potentials (LFPs) recorded in the CA3 pyramidal layer from rat hippocampal slices. Gamma oscillations were induced by bath application of acetylcholine (ACh, 10 μM) and physostigmine (Physo, 2 μM). Addition of DA (100 μM) to the bath inhibited the power of gamma oscillations. (Ab) Power spectra of ACh-induced gamma oscillations before and after DA application. (B) Spectrogram of the gamma oscillations before, during and after the application of DA. (C) Bars summarize the effect of DA on the peak power (Ca), half bandwidth (Cb) and peak frequency (Cc). Data were normalized to the mean of the 10-min period before DA application or the corresponding time in control experiments. ∗p < 0.05 compared to the time-matched control.

Dopamine D3 Receptors Inhibit Cholinergically Induced Gamma Oscillations in the Hippocampus

Our previous study on the effects of antipsychotics on gamma oscillations suggested that among DA receptors, only the activation of D3 receptor altered gamma oscillations significantly (Schulz et al., 2012a). To further investigate the effect of these receptors on gamma oscillations, we next applied PD-128907 (10 μM), a selective DA D3 agonist and found that it decreased the power to 43.4 ± 8.1% (n = 8, p < 0.001 compared to control; Figure 2) and broadened the half bandwidth of the gamma oscillations to 216.6 ± 37.0% (p = 0.003, compared to control; Figure 2). The peak frequency of the oscillation did not change (100.2 ± 4.9%, p = 0.642 compared to control; Figure 2). To confirm whether indeed the D3 receptors are responsible for the effect of PD-128907, we repeated the experiments in the presence of PG-01037 (10 μM), a selective antagonist at D3 receptors. PG-01037 itself did not significantly alter gamma oscillations (power: 133.0 ± 22.9%, p = 0.212; bandwidth: 113.9 ± 12.8%, p = 0.780; frequency: 101.1 ± 1.0%; n = 7; p = 0.475 compared to control; Figure 2D) but antagonized the effect of PD-128907 on power (96.0 ± 20.1%, n = 7, p = 0.024 compared to PD-128907 alone, Figure 2) and half bandwidth (123.0 ± 14.3%, p = 0.047 compared to PD-128907 alone, Figure 2), whereas the frequency of the oscillation was not changed (103.1 ± 14.7%, p = 0.607 compared to PD-128907 alone, Figure 2). On the contrary, L-741,626 (10 μM), a selective D2 receptor antagonist, did not reverse the effect of PD-128907 (power: 33.0 ± 9.8%, n = 7, p = 0.422; half bandwidth: 162.0 ± 31.3%, p = 0.199; frequency: 96.8 ± 6.5%, p = 0.543 compared to PD-128907 alone). These data indicate that PD-128907 reduced the magnitude and precision of gamma oscillations via selective activation of D3 receptors.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Open in a new tab

Activation of D3 dopamine receptors inhibits cholinergically induced hippocampal gamma oscillations. (A) LFP recordings from the CA3 pyramidal cell layer after induction of gamma oscillations by ACh (10 μM) and Physo (2 μM) before (black) and after (orange) the application of the selective D3 receptor agonist PD-128907 (PD, 10 μM) alone (Aa), in the presence of the D3 receptor antagonist PG-01037 (10 μM, Ab) or in the presence of the selective D2 receptor antagonist L-741,626 (10 μM, Ac). Only the D3 antagonist antagonized the effect of PD-128907 indicating that only the D3 receptors are involved in the effect. (B) Spectrograms showing the effect of PD-128907 on hippocampal gamma oscillations in the absence (Ba) and presence (Bb) of the D3 antagonist PG-01037. PG-01037 could antagonize the effect of PD-128907. (C) Power spectra showing the effect of PD-128907 (PD) on hippocampal gamma oscillations alone (Ca), in the presence of PG-01037 (PG; Cb) and in the presence of L-741,626 (Cc). (D) Bars summarize the effect of PD-128907 alone and in the presence of selective DA receptor antagonists on the peak power (Da), half bandwidth (Db) and peak frequency (Dc). The last bar shows the effect of PG-01037 alone. Data were normalized to the mean of the 10-min period before PD-128907 application or the corresponding time in control experiments. ∗p < 0.05 compared to the time-matched control.

D3 Receptors Inhibit Kainate-Induced Hippocampal Gamma Oscillations

Gamma oscillations can also be induced by activation of KA receptors on pyramidal and basket cells (Fisahn et al., 2004), showing a different pharmacological profile compared to ACh-induced gamma oscillations (Schulz et al., 2012b). To test whether D3 receptors can also modulate KA-induced gamma oscillations, we applied KA (100 nM) on hippocampal slices and reliably induced gamma oscillations in the CA3 pyramidal layer with a peak power of 943.31 ± 388.64 μV2, a peak frequency of 42.72 ± 0.96 Hz and a half bandwidth of 3.72 ± 0.85 Hz. Application of PD-128907 decreased the power to 67.7 ± 11.9% (n = 5; compared to KA control: 142.9 ± 12.2%, n = 5; p = 0.002) and broadened the bandwidth to 119.4 ± 5.7% (compared to KA control: 79.2 ± 8.2; p = 0.004; Figure 3). The frequency increased to 105.0 ± 1.8% (compared to KA control: 95.2 ± 0.6%; p = 0.001). We compared the effects of PD-128907 on ACh- and KA-induced gamma oscillations in Table 1. As seen, we did not find any statistical different effects on any parameters between the two induction protocols.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Open in a new tab

Activation of dopamine D3 receptors (D3 receptors) inhibits kainate (KA)-induced hippocampal gamma oscillations. (A) LFPs recorded in the CA3 pyramidal layer from rat hippocampal slices. (Aa) Gamma oscillations were induced by bath application of KA (100 nM). The selective D3 receptor agonist PD-128907 (10 μM) inhibited the power of gamma oscillations. (Ab) Power spectra of KA-induced gamma oscillations in the absence (black) and presence (orange) of PD-128907. (B) Bars summarize the effect of PD-128907 on the peak power (Ba), half bandwidth (Bb) and peak frequency (Bc) of gamma oscillations. Data were normalized to the mean of the 10-min period before PD-128907 application or the corresponding time in control experiments. ∗p < 0.05 compared to the time-matched control.

Table 1.

Effects of PD-128907 on ACh- and KA-induced gamma oscillations.

Oscillation parameter ACh (10 μM) + Physo (2 μM) KA (100 nM)
Peak power (mV2) 43.4 ± 8.1%* 67.7 ± 11.9%*
Peak frequency (Hz) 100.2 ± 4.9% 105.0 ± 1.8%*
Half bandwidth (Hz) 216.6 ± 37.0%* 119.4 ± 5.7%*
Open in a new tab

Data were normalized to the baseline period before PD-128907 application. ∗p < 0.05 compared to control experiment.

D3 Receptors Slow Down the Development of Gamma Oscillations

Since in vivo cortical network activity is dynamic and characterized by appearing and disappearing synchronization, we next investigated whether D3 receptors could have an effect on these dynamics. To do so, gamma oscillations were first induced by ACh and Physo (baseline state) and then washed out after stabilization of the oscillations either in the presence or the absence (control) of the D3 antagonist PG-01037. As a consequence of the removal of the ACh and Physo, the gamma oscillations became progressively less powerful, faster and less synchronized (Figure 4A). After 40 min of washout of ACh and Physo (wash-out state), the gamma power showed massive reduction (5.8 ± 1.6% of the baseline state, n = 9; p < 0.001 compared to baseline state), and both the frequency (43.4 ± 1.4 Hz; p = 0.013 compared to baseline state 38.9 ± 1.1 Hz) and the half bandwidth (13.2 ± 1.4 Hz; p = 0.010 compared to baseline state 4.1 ± 0.8 Hz; Figure 4A) increased. Blockade of the D3 receptors by PG-01037 (10 μM) did not affect the desynchronisation of the gamma oscillations (power: 4.3 ± 1.4% of the baseline state, n = 7, p = 0.497 compared to the control washout state; frequency: 41.5 ± 1.4 Hz, p = 0.368; bandwidth: 11.3 ± 1.1 Hz, p = 0.340; Figure 4). Next, ACh and Physo were re-perfused to the ACSF to investigate the dynamics of neuronal network resynchronization. In the control experiment, 30 min after the renewed presence of ACh and Physo (re-wash-in state), the power increased significantly to 39.6 ± 10.56% of baseline (p = 0.009 compared to wash-out state) and the half bandwidth started to decrease to 10.9 ± 1.6 Hz (p = 0.232 compared to wash-out state; Figures 4Aa,b). In contrast, the frequency in the re-wash-in state was unchanged when compared to wash-out state (44.5 ± 1.1 Hz; p = 0.497 compared to wash-out state; Figure 4Ac).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Open in a new tab

Inhibition of D3 receptors speeds re-synchronization of hippocampal gamma oscillations. (A) The selective D3 receptor antagonist PG-01037 (10 μM, black circles) did not affect the decay of gamma oscillations after the washout of ACh and Physo but significantly fastened their re-synchronization as seen in the faster increase of the power (Aa), faster narrowing of the half bandwidth (Ab) and reversing of the original peak frequency (Ac). In control experiments no PG-01037 was applied (open circles) (B; Left) LFP recordings before washing out of ACh and Physo (black) and after the re-perfusion of the same drugs (orange). (Right) Power spectra for the same recordings marked with the same colors. ∗p < 0.05 compared to the time-matched control.

Interestingly, PG-01037 strongly facilitated the re-synchronization of the oscillations (Figure 4). 30 min after wash-in of ACh and Physo (re-wash-in state), the gamma power and the half bandwidth returned back to values comparable to those initially present during the baseline state (power: 93.7 ± 24.4% of baseline, p = 0.044 compared to control experiments; half bandwidth: 4.9 ± 0.7 Hz compared to the baseline state 4.0 ± 0.8 Hz, p = 0.012 compared to the control experiments; Figures 4Aa,b). Also the frequency decreased, but failed to recover to values of the baseline state. However, compared to the control group at the same time, it is significantly reduced (41.1 ± 1.0 Hz compared to control group 44.3 ± 0.9 Hz, p = 0.031; Figure 4Ac).

D3 Receptors Alter Firing Properties of CA3 Pyramidal Cells

To investigate the mechanisms underlying the gamma oscillation inhibition by activation of D3 receptors, we recorded membrane potential from CA3 pyramidal cells by means of intracellular sharp electrodes after stabilization of cholinergic gamma oscillations. During gamma oscillations, a robust membrane potential oscillation was observed with a mean frequency of 30.2 ± 2.5 Hz and a peak-to-peak amplitude of 1.78 ± 0.57 mV. The frequency of these membrane potential oscillations was comparable to the frequency of the LFP oscillations measured in parallel by the extracellular electrode (LFP: 33.5 ± 1.57 Hz; p = 0.292). Application of the D3 receptor agonist PD-128907 reduced the peak-to-peak amplitude of the membrane potential oscillations to 0.86 ± 0.26 mV (p = 0.047), whereas their frequency was not changed (29.1 ± 2.8 Hz, p = 0.424).

The cells fired APs at a rate of 9.8 ± 2.4 Hz (n = 7) phase-locked to the gamma oscillations (Rayleigh test, p < 0.001 for each cell; Moore’s test, p < 0.05 for the cell population, n = 7). Circular analysis of APs related to the gamma cycle revealed a mean phase Φ of 15.3 ± 15.3° (mean ± circular standard error; 0° = trough of the gamma cycle) and a mean vector length r of 0.71 ± 0.07 after low-pass filtering, indicating a rather high accuracy of neuronal firing within the gamma cycle (r = 1 would mean that all cells fired all APs at the very same phase with maximal synchrony, r = 0 that all APs were equally distributed over the gamma cycle).

PD-128907 reduced the firing rate of pyramidal cells to 5.7 ± 1.9 Hz (p = 0.045, n = 7). Whereas Φ did not change (17.3 ± 18.4°, p > 0.05) indicating that the cells still fired at the same phase within the gamma cycle on average, r decreased to 0.58 ± 0.07 (p = 0.027, Hotelling test for paired samples; Figure 5) suggesting that the synchrony of spike timing was reduced after D3 receptor activation.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Open in a new tab

Dopamine D3 receptors decrease the firing rate, firing synchrony and membrane potential oscillations in CA3 pyramidal cells during gamma oscillations. (Aa) LFP recordings from the CA3 pyramidal cell layer (top), the low-pass (100 Hz) filtered LFP signal (middle) and the corresponding intracellular recording from a CA3 pyramidal cell (bottom) after the induction of gamma oscillations by ACh and Physo. (Ab) Effects of the selective D3 receptor agonist PD-128907 (10 μM) on the LFP recordings (top) and the corresponding intracellular recordings from a CA3 pyramidal cell (bottom). (B) Bars summarize the firing rates before and after PD-128907 application. (Ca) Phase histograms of action potentials (APs) before and after PD-128907 application. The average curve for all measured cells is shown (n = 7). In every cell, 1000 APs were analyzed. 0° represents the troughs of the gamma cycles after low-pass filtering. PD-128907 broadened the distribution of APs during the gamma cycle. (Cb) Bars summarize the mean vector lengths (r) before and after PD-128907 application. r = 1 would mean that all cells fired all APs at the very same phase with maximal synchrony; r = 0 that all APs were equally distributed over the gamma cycle. (D) Bars summarize the peak-to-peak amplitude of membrane potential oscillations from CA3 pyramidal cells before and after PD-128907 application. ∗p < 0.05 compared to the 10-min baseline period before PD-128907.

Analyzing spontaneous APs during gamma oscillations before and after PD-128907 application revealed that neither the AP half-width (control: 1.02 ± 0.04 ms; PD-128907: 1.04 ± 0.05; p = 0.680, not shown) nor the AP amplitude (control: 54.0 ± 3.2 mV; PD-128907: 54.1 ± 4.4 mV; p = 0.978, not shown) were affected.

Discussion

D3 Receptors and Cognition

While preclinical and clinical data suggest that activation of D3 receptors impairs cognitive processes and blockade or knock out of the receptors have pro-cognitive effects (Nakajima et al., 2013), much less is known about the underlying mechanisms. Our data on hippocampal gamma oscillations may offer an explanation. The hippocampus, expressing D3 receptors (Bouthenet et al., 1991; Richtand et al., 1995; Khan et al., 1998), is involved in a line of cognitive cues also affected by D3 receptors (Rubin et al., 2014). Moreover, gamma oscillations in the hippocampus play a key role in signal processing necessary for working memory, attention, learning and retrieval of memory by transiently enabling the communication between neurons and neuronal groups in different brain areas (Lisman and Jensen, 2013). In particular, the CA3 area of the hippocampus with its strong recurrent collateral associative connectivity is thought to keep information in the working memory by means of synchronous oscillation of pyramidal cells belonging to the assembly coding the pattern until it is stored in the synapses between CA3 pyramidal cells (Rolls, 2013). ACh release in the cortex closely follows the time-course of attention-demanding events (Parikh et al., 2007). Stronger gamma band modulations in V4 correlated with faster reaction times (Womelsdorf et al., 2006; Buehlmann and Deco, 2008) suggesting that the dynamic changes of gamma oscillations have behavioral consequences. Our results suggest that D3 receptor antagonists might exhibit their pro-cognitive effects by modulation of the dynamics of hippocampal gamma oscillations.

Dopaminergic neurons release DA within the forebrain in two different modes: the low tonic and the high phasic transmission mode. The tonic release underlies the background, steady state level of extracellular DA and is mediated by dopaminergic neuron population activity whereas the phasic release is produced by the activation of dopaminergic neuron firing by behaviorally relevant stimuli (Grace, 1991). High affinity D3 receptors may be activated during the tonic mode by the lower level of DA within the target sites, whereas low affinity receptors may only be activated by higher DA levels reached only during the phasic release. Our results suggest that the two release modes might trigger opposing effects and DA, by activating different receptors, may increase the signal-to-noise ratio: during the background release, gamma oscillations are inhibited by the high affinity D3 receptors. Salient stimuli may transiently increase DA levels in the forebrain activating low affinity DA receptors, such as the D4 receptor, which may increase gamma oscillations and thus cognitive processes such as attention, perceptual grouping, spatial navigation, and memory (Andersson et al., 2012).

D3 Receptors and Schizophrenia

Besides genetic studies (Jönsson et al., 2003; Talkowski et al., 2006) there are also pharmacological evidences for the involvement of D3 receptors in schizophrenia. The atypical antipsychotic amisulpride is a pure D2 and D3 receptor antagonist with Ki values of 1.7 and 2.5 nM, respectively (Tadori et al., 2011). Aripiprazole, another atypical antipsychotic, has a partial agonistic profile at both D2 and D3 receptors with Ki values of 2.5 and 4.2 nM, respectively (Tadori et al., 2011). Because of the 7–40-fold higher affinity of endogenous DA for the D3 versus D2 receptors (Tadori et al., 2011), the D3 occupancy by these drugs might be lower (Girgis et al., 2011). Indeed, aripiprazole was only effective against cognitive impairment and negative symptoms at doses similar to or higher than its antipsychotic-like effective dose, suggesting that a higher D3 occupancy is needed for these effects (Adham et al., 2014). Cariprazine is a newly developed antipsychotic with profound pro-cognitive effects and very high affinity for the D3 receptor of 0.08 nM compared to the D2 receptors: 0.6 nM (Kiss et al., 2010). At a dose equivalent to the ED50 for antipsychotic like efficacy, cariprazine showed high levels (above 80%) of both D2 and D3 occupancy which may contribute to its better therapeutic outcome against cognitive and negative symptoms (Adham et al., 2014).

In individuals with schizophrenia, altered and instable gamma oscillations have been observed (Kwon et al., 1999). Our data suggest that antipsychotics with high affinity for the D3 receptor exert their antipsychotic effects by normalizing altered gamma oscillations. Since schizophrenia is characterized by disturbed (i.e., alternately enhanced and reduced) gamma oscillations, we suggest that partial agonism/antagonism at the D3 receptor may be a better therapeutic approach to treat schizophrenia than a pure antagonism. Partial agonists may stabilize gamma network activity at different circumstances such as different DA levels (Kiss et al., 2010; MacDonald and Bartolomé, 2010).

Cellular Mechanisms Underlying the Inhibition of Gamma Oscillations in the CA3

We did not find significant differences between the effects of D3 receptors on ACh and KA-induced gamma oscillations (Table 1) as seen, e.g., for purinergic receptors (Schulz et al., 2012b). This may indicate that D3 receptors exert their non-specific inhibition of the gamma circuitries in the hippocampus by acting at a downstream target involved in both types of gamma oscillations. D3 receptors are Gi protein-coupled and decrease the intracellular level of cAMP (Missale et al., 1998). In the hippocampus they have been described on pyramidal cells (Khan et al., 1998; Swant et al., 2008). Hippocampal gamma oscillations are generated by synchronous rhythmic inhibition of pyramidal cell firing by fast spiking perisomatic parvalbumin+ interneurons (Gulyás et al., 2010). Their activation is due to excitatory drive supplied through feed forward or feedback excitatory inputs from granule and pyramidal cells, respectively. CA3 pyramidal cells fired APs at a rate of ∼10 Hz during gamma oscillations which was reduced by activation of D3 receptors to ∼6 Hz. Thus, within one gamma cycle in the presence of D3 agonists, less pyramidal cells fired. Moreover, the synchrony of the firing at a given phase of gamma oscillations was also reduced, suggesting that the coupling of APs to the gamma cycle became less accurate.

D3 receptors have been found to selectively downregulate T-type Ca2+ channels in the axon initial segment of auditory brainstem interneurons, which in turn reduced the AP output of these cells (Bender et al., 2010). Given the fact that axon initial segment Ca2+ transients have been observed also in pyramidal cells (Schiller et al., 1995), D3 receptors might also effectively inhibit the firing frequency and synchrony in the hippocampus by this mechanism. We also observed that D3 receptors inhibited membrane potential oscillations during gamma activity. These oscillations might reflect rhythmic synaptic inputs onto pyramidal cells, and their inhibition suggests that D3 receptors affect these inputs. Indeed, D3 receptor activation decreased the amplitude of inhibitory postsynaptic currents in CA1 pyramidal cells evoked in stratum radiatum possibly by causing endocytosis of GABAA receptors in the apical dendrites (Swant et al., 2008).

Conclusion

Fast network oscillations are the groundwork for cognitive processes such as attention, perceptual grouping, spatial navigation and memory. Moreover, disturbed gamma oscillations have been observed in diverse diseases such as schizophrenia, Alzheimer’s disease and autism. Our results show that activation of D3 receptors decreases power, coherence and dynamics of hippocampal gamma oscillations and provide a possible explanation how agonists may impair cognition and how antagonists exhibit pro-cognitive and antipsychotic effects. The complex network dynamics engendered by D3 receptor activation help shed further light on the generation and maintenance of gamma oscillations in the brain, and may one day be useful in developing targeted treatment options for a variety of neuropsychiatric conditions.

Author Contributions

CL conducted and analyzed field potential recordings, SS and KH performed and analyzed intracellular recordings, RK had important role in interpreting the data, ZG designed and analyzed the experiments and drafted the manuscript, all authors revised the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (KO 3814/1-1). The authors thank J. R. Geiger for fruitful discussions and C. Holman for thoroughly reading the manuscript.

Abbreviations

5-HT3 receptor

5-hydroxytryptamine 3 receptor

ACSF

artificial cerebrospinal fluid

AP

action potential

D1 receptor

dopamine D1 receptor

D2 receptor

dopamine D2 receptor

D3 receptor

dopamine D3 receptor

D4 receptor

dopamine D4 receptor

DA

dopamine

KA

kainate

Ki

dissociation constant

LFP

local field potential

Physo

physostigmine

References

  1. Adham N., Gyertyán I., Kiss B. (2014). Cariprazine demonstrates greater potency than aripiprazole in animal models of psychosis, cognitive impairment, and negative symptoms. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 24:S233 10.1016/S0924-977X(14)70363-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersson R. H., Johnston A., Herman P. A., Winzer-Serhan U. H., Karavanova I., Vullhorst D., et al. (2012). Neuregulin and dopamine modulation of hippocampal gamma oscillations is dependent on dopamine D4 receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109 13118–13123. 10.1073/pnas.1201011109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Axmacher N., Cohen M. X., Fell J., Haupt S., Dümpelmann M., Elger C. E., et al. (2010). Intracranial EEG correlates of expectancy and memory formation in the human hippocampus and nucleus accumbens. Neuron 65 541–549. 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.02.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bender K. J., Ford C. P., Trussell L. O. (2010). Dopaminergic modulation of axon initial segment calcium channels regulates action potential initiation. Neuron 68 500–511. 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.09.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bouthenet M. L., Souil E., Martres M. P., Sokoloff P., Giros B., Schwartz J. C. (1991). Localization of dopamine D3 receptor mRNA in the rat brain using in situ hybridization histochemistry: comparison with dopamine D2 receptor mRNA. Brain Res. 564 203–219. 10.1016/0006-8993(91)91456-B [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Buehlmann A., Deco G. (2008). The neuronal basis of attention: rate versus synchronization modulation. J. Neurosci. 28 7679–7686. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5640-07.2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Çalişkan G., Schulz S. B., Gruber D., Behr J., Heinemann U., Gerevich Z. (2015). Corticosterone and corticotropin-releasing factor acutely facilitate gamma oscillations in the hippocampus in vitro. Eur. J. Neurosci. 41 31–44. 10.1111/ejn.12750 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cools R., Altamirano L., D’Esposito M. (2006). Reversal learning in Parkinson’s disease depends on medication status and outcome valence. Neuropsychologia 44 1663–1673. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.03.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fisahn A., Contractor A., Traub R. D., Buhl E. H., Heinemann S. F., McBain C. J. (2004). Distinct roles for the kainate receptor subunits GluR5 and GluR6 in kainate-induced hippocampal gamma oscillations. J. Neurosci. 24 9658–9668. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2973-04.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fisahn A., Pike F. G., Buhl E. H., Paulsen O. (1998). Cholinergic induction of network oscillations at 40 Hz in the hippocampus in vitro. Nature 394 186–189. 10.1038/28179 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Girgis R. R., Xu X., Miyake N., Easwaramoorthy B., Gunn R. N., Rabiner E. A., et al. (2011). In vivo binding of antipsychotics to D3 and D2 receptors: a PET study in baboons with [11C]-(+)-PHNO. Neuropsychopharmacology 36 887–895. 10.1038/npp.2010.228 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Glickstein S. B., Desteno D. A., Hof P. R., Schmauss C. (2005). Mice lacking dopamine D2 and D3 receptors exhibit differential activation of prefrontal cortical neurons during tasks requiring attention. Cereb. Cortex 15 1016–1024. 10.1093/cercor/bhh202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Grace A. A. (1991). Phasic versus tonic dopamine release and the modulation of dopamine system responsivity: a hypothesis for the etiology of schizophrenia. Neuroscience 41 1–24. 10.1016/0306-4522(91)90196-U [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gross G., Wicke K., Drescher K. U. (2013). Dopamine D3 receptor antagonism–still a therapeutic option for the treatment of schizophrenia. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 386 155–166. 10.1007/s00210-012-0806-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gulyás A. I., Szabó G. G., Ulbert I., Holderith N., Monyer H., Erdélyi F., et al. (2010). Parvalbumin-containing fast-spiking basket cells generate the field potential oscillations induced by cholinergic receptor activation in the hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 30 15134–15145. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4104-10.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gurevich E. V., Bordelon Y., Shapiro R. M., Arnold S. E., Gur R. E., Joyce J. N. (1997). Mesolimbic dopamine D3 receptors and use of antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia. A postmortem study. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 54 225–232. 10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830150047009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hájos N., Ellender T. J., Zemankovics R., Mann E. O., Exley R., Cragg S. J., et al. (2009). Maintaining network activity in submerged hippocampal slices: importance of oxygen supply. Eur. J. Neurosci. 29 319–327. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06577.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hamidovic A., Kang U. J., de Wit H. J. (2008). Effects of low to moderate acute doses of pramipexole on impulsivity and cognition in healthy volunteers. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 28 45–51. 10.1097/jcp.0b013e3181602fab [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jönsson E. G., Flyckt L., Burgert E., Crocq M. A., Forslund K., Mattila-Evenden M., et al. (2003). Dopamine D3 receptor gene Ser9Gly variant and schizophrenia: association study and meta-analysis. Psychiatr. Genet. 13 1–12. 10.1097/00041444-200303000-00001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Khan Z. U., Gutiérrez A., Martín R., Peñafiel A., Rivera A., De La Calle A. (1998). Differential regional and cellular distribution of dopamine D2-like receptors: an immunocytochemical study of subtype-specific antibodies in rat and human brain. J. Comp. Neurol. 402 353–371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kiss B., Horváth A., Némethy Z., Schmidt E., Laszlovszky I., Bugovics G., et al. (2010). Cariprazine (RGH-188), a dopamine D(3) receptor-preferring, D(3)/D(2) dopamine receptor antagonist-partial agonist antipsychotic candidate: in vitro and neurochemical profile. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 333 328–340. 10.1124/jpet.109.160432 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Klaft Z. J., Schulz S. B., Maslarova A., Gabriel S., Heinemann U., Gerevich Z. (2012). Extracellular ATP differentially affects epileptiform activity via purinergic P2X7 and adenosine A1 receptors in naive and chronic epileptic rats. Epilepsia 53 1978–1986. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03724.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kwon J. S., O’Donnell B. F., Wallenstein G. V., Greene R. W., Hirayasu Y., Nestor P. G., et al. (1999). Gamma frequency-range abnormalities to auditory stimulation in schizophrenia. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 56 1001–1005. 10.1001/archpsyc.56.11.1001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Laszy J., Laszlovszky I., Gyertyán I. (2005). Dopamine D3 receptor antagonists improve the learning performance in memory-impaired rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 179 567–575. 10.1007/s00213-004-2096-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lee S. H., Kim D. W., Kim E. Y., Kim S., Im C. H. (2010). Dysfunctional gamma-band activity during face structural processing in schizophrenia patients. Schizophr. Res. 119 191–197. 10.1016/j.schres.2010.02.1058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Light G. A., Hsu J. L., Hsieh M. H., Meyer-Gomes K., Sprock J., Swerdlow N. R., et al. (2006). Gamma band oscillations reveal neural network cortical coherence dysfunction in schizophrenia patients. Biol. Psychiatry 60 1231–1240. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.03.055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lisman J. E., Jensen O. (2013). The 𝜃-γ neural code. Neuron 77 1002–1016. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.03.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Loiseau F., Millan M. J. (2009). Blockade of dopamine D(3) receptors in frontal cortex, but not in sub-cortical structures, enhances social recognition in rats: similar actions of D(1) receptor agonists, but not of D(2) antagonists. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 19 23–33. 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2008.07.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. MacDonald G. J., Bartolomé J. M. (2010). A decade of progress in the discovery and development of ’atypical’ antipsychotics. Prog. Med. Chem. 49 37–80. 10.1016/S0079-6468(10)49002-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Millan M. J., Agid Y., Brüne M., Bullmore E. T., Carter C. S., Clayton N. S., et al. (2012). Cognitive dysfunction in psychiatric disorders: characteristics, causes and the quest for improved therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 11 141–168. 10.1038/nrd3628 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Missale C., Nash S. R., Robinson S. W., Jaber M., Caron M. G. (1998). Dopamine receptors: from structure to function. Physiol. Rev. 78 189–225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Miyamoto S., Miyake N., Jarskog L. F., Fleischhacker W. W., Lieberman J. A. (2012). Pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia: a critical review of the pharmacology and clinical effects of current and future therapeutic agents. Mol. Psychiatry 17 1206–1227. 10.1038/mp.2012.47 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mulert C., Kirsch V., Pascual-Marqui R., McCarley R. W., Spencer K. M. (2011). Long-range synchrony of gamma oscillations and auditory hallucination symptoms in schizophrenia. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 79 55–63. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.08.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nakajima S., Gerretsen P., Takeuchi H., Caravaggio F., Chow T., Le Foll B., et al. (2013). The potential role of dopamine D3 receptor neurotransmission in cognition. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 23 799–813. 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2013.05.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Parikh V., Kozak R., Martinez V., Sarter M. (2007). Prefrontal acetylcholine release controls cue detection on multiple timescales. Neuron 56 141–154. 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.08.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Powell A. D., Saintot P. P., Gill K. K., Bharathan A., Buck S. C., Morris G., et al. (2014). Reduced gamma oscillations in a mouse model of intellectual disability: a role for impaired repetitive neurotransmission? PLoS ONE 9:e95871 10.1371/journal.pone.0095871 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Richtand N. M., Kelsoe J. R., Segal D. S., Kuczenski R. (1995). Regional quantification of D1, D2, and D3 dopamine receptor mRNA in rat brain using a ribonuclease protection assay. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 33 97–103. 10.1016/0169-328X(95)00112-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Rolls E. T. (2013). The mechanisms for pattern completion and pattern separation in the hippocampus. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7:74 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Rubin R. D., Watson P. D., Duff M. C., Cohen N. J. (2014). The role of the hippocampus in flexible cognition and social behavior. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:742 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00742 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Schiller J., Helmchen F., Sakmann B. (1995). Spatial profile of dendritic calcium transients evoked by action potentials in rat neocortical pyramidal neurones. J. Physiol. 487 583–600. 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020902 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Schulz S. B., Heidmann K. E., Mike A., Klaft Z. J., Heinemann U., Gerevich Z. (2012a). First and second generation antipsychotics influence hippocampal gamma oscillations by interactions with 5-HT3 and D3 receptors. Br. J. Pharmacol. 167 1480–1491. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02107.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Schulz S. B., Klaft Z. J., Rösler A. R., Heinemann U., Gerevich Z. (2012b). Purinergic P2X, P2Y and adenosine receptors differentially modulate hippocampal gamma oscillations. Neuropharmacology 62 914–924. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.09.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Smith A. G., Neill J. C., Costall B. (1999). The dopamine D3/D2 receptor agonist 7-OH-DPAT induces cognitive impairment in the marmoset. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 63 201–211. 10.1016/S0091-3057(98)00230-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Swant J., Stramiello M., Wagner J. J. (2008). Postsynaptic dopamine D3 receptor modulation of evoked IPSCs via GABAA receptor endocytosis in rat hippocampus. Hippocampus 18 492–502. 10.1002/hipo.20408 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Szekeres G., Kéri S., Juhász A., Rimanóczy A., Szendi I., Czimmer C., et al. (2004). Role of dopamine D3 receptor (DRD3) and dopamine transporter (DAT) polymorphism in cognitive dysfunctions and therapeutic response to atypical antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 124B 1–5. 10.1002/ajmg.b.20045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Tadori Y., Forbes R. A., McQuade R. D., Kikuchi T. (2011). Functional potencies of dopamine agonists and antagonists at human dopamine D2 and D3 receptors. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 666 43–52. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2011.05.050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Talkowski M. E., Mansour H., Chowdari K. V., Wood J., Butler A., Varma P. G., et al. (2006). Novel, replicated associations between dopamine D3 receptor gene polymorphisms and schizophrenia in two independent samples. Biol. Psychiatry 60 570–577. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.04.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Uhlhaas P. J., Singer W. (2010). Abnormal neural oscillations and synchrony in schizophrenia. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11 100–113. 10.1038/nrn2774 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Ukai M., Tanaka T., Kameyama T. (1997). Effects of the dopamine D3 receptor agonist, R(+)-7-hydroxy-N,N-di-n-propyl-2-aminotetralin, on memory processes in mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 324 147–151. 10.1016/S0014-2999(97)00075-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Watson D. J., Loiseau F., Ingallinesi M., Millan M. J., Marsden C. A., Fone K. C. (2012). Selective blockade of dopamine D3 receptors enhances while D2 receptor antagonism impairs social novelty discrimination and novel object recognition in rats: a key role for the prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology 37 770–786. 10.1038/npp.2011.254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Womelsdorf T., Fries P., Mitra P. P., Desimone R. (2006). Gamma-band synchronization in visual cortex predicts speed of change detection. Nature 439 733–736. 10.1038/nature04258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Xing B., Meng X., Wei S., Li S. (2010). Influence of dopamine D3 receptor knockout on age-related decline of spatial memory. Neurosci. Lett. 481 149–153. 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.06.071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES